~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | "Men should be offended" (x-post from r/feminisms) I whole-heartedly agree.It is probably, like most of these things, a combination of both biological and cultural. There are most likely biological factors that make you much more likely to rape someone, being a legitimate sociopath for example. But there are likely cultural factors that also make you more likely to rape, being exposed to rape and violence as a child for example. In my mind, specifying which factor is 'more important' is counter productive. | /r/MensRights | 05/09/12 04:30 AM |
| 2 | 22 years old girl on financial abortion. Improved version. What you think?Not actually a problem. The contract can be written such that the woman is given the choice and the man has to abide by the choice, providing child support if the child is kept. If you, as a man, do not want to sign that contract you simply do not have sex with that person. | /r/MensRights | 31/08/12 11:00 PM |
| 2 | Why MRAs Should Be Pro-Choice: If only rape victims are allowed abortions, false accusations will skyrocket.When does 'science' say a fetus becomes a child: when its heart first beats? When the first signal is sent by a neuron? When a child is first able to survive outside of the womb (or maybe the theoretical limit of a child survival) with some probability? When the child is first born (is that head or feet or does it depend on the orientation)? When the child first focuses?, crawls?, walks?, talks?, speaks coherently? What does 'science' say and by what assumptions is 'science' saying this? As for … | /r/MensRights | 28/08/12 10:50 PM |
| 9 | According to my University's mandatory rape training, women do not require consentYou make interesting points. But I still find difficulty in reconcile Hugh's need for explicit verbal consent and Elizabeth's, and your, assumption that sex includes blowjobs. Hugh never explicitly consented to a blowjob, all you have is implied consent, which is based off of your own personal beliefs about sex. Elizabeth, and you, have absolutely no proof that sex includes oral sex to Hugh. Let's change some things around. Does Hugh's statement about desiring sex mean that he has consented to g… | /r/MensRights | 27/08/12 08:11 PM |
| 1 | A new one regarding the wage gap that I have no answer to.Please do link the sudy, I am rather interested in how they showed causation and not just correlation. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/12 04:30 PM |
| 1 | Thread about RapeX "anti-rape" device - user comment "If you don't like it, don't rape people".It depends on how society react to the device but there is a possibility it will create a standard: if a man has this thing on his dick it automatically means rape. This defensive device is therefore turned into a weapon. From a different perspective, while it may stop you from being raped, it does not stop rapists. There are other methods of rape then penis in vagina and this does not stop any of those. | /r/MensRights | 05/08/12 04:05 PM |
| 1 | Suggesting women drink responsibly causes outrage from feminist groups.By the legal definition of consent, as I understand it, consensual sex with a drunk person is impossible; you can not give consent when drunk. So the term consensual drunk sex does not make sense as you can not give consent while drunk. So your four lines get condensed into one: If a drunk woman has sex, it is rape. The last line is where things get even murkier. People, and I do mean everyone, are rather good at jumps of logic. In this case a woman who regrets sex the morning after can believe … | /r/MensRights | 05/08/12 03:36 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter