TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

huggiesdsc Archive

View 0 posts and 28 comments by huggiesdsc on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Leave her alone? She just rejected 3 guys, I doubt she was holding out for my best pickup line.
/r/seduction06/09/25 06:43 PM
1

Alright but if I glance back and you're looking at my butt I'm coming back
/r/seduction22/04/25 01:10 AM
2

Nah yeah that's fair, I'll hit it from the back then
/r/seduction22/04/25 01:07 AM
5

Same in all regards. We have a two party system where both parties serve the capital owning class, so we really have a one party system with two hats.
/r/BlackPillScience29/09/22 04:56 PM
3

Saying hi is a huge help. People really appreciate being acknowledged, even briefly. It's fake and it costs mental energy to muster the enthusiasm, but we exert energy on lots of shit and this yields a disproportionately good return on investment. There's this grumpy senior manager at work who doesn't like anyone, but he's courteous with me because I ask him how he's doing every so often. Our entire friendship is simple hellos, but he seems to regard me fondly.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/22 03:53 PM
4

This is a dumb observation, but I've found people really like big hellos. In college there was this guy who would make a big announcement whenever I walked into the room. "WHOA, it's Huggiesdsc! How the hell are you, man!?" I loved it. We never even had any real conversations, but I still consider him a good friend. I started doing it for other people and it's dumb but it makes people inexplicably happy.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/22 03:30 PM
0

Dude, be aggressive. Your anger is valid. As long as you're aiming it at the people who deserve it, you deserve to express your anger.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/22 03:26 PM
2

I often get lost on minutiae and lose sight of what's relevant. I also often get accused of overthinking details that are actually CRUCIAL and people are too quick to dismiss. I'll predict a negative outcome, plan around it, it'll come into play, and everyone else will fail while shrugging it off as bad luck. Wasn't luck in my case! Their loss...
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/22 03:16 PM
1

I've always found the self-interest philosophy to be a baffling reason to reject ethics. Behaving ethically is insanely self-beneficial. Practicing empathy is such a worthy endeavor that you really can't critique it from a self-interest angle. There are obvious tangible social benefits, and if those doesn't appeal to always there's always the undeniable internal satisfaction of self-actualization. For me there's satisfaction in hypothesized about a theoretical universal system that works more ef…
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/22 03:11 PM
0

What are you, politically? Aside from apathetic.
/r/BlackPillScience27/09/22 03:06 PM
2

This is a valid concern and warrants a conversation. It sounds like something may have upset him and he is struggling to communicate about it.
/r/RedPillWomen30/11/21 02:25 PM
4

Two women I matched with told me they didn't want to meet up due to the pandemic. They nonetheless went out with their friends and took all the same risks they'd be taking anyway. The next girl I spoke with wanted to meet up anyways, and we're dating now. Idk man it's a valid excuse, but if a girl cites the pandemic as the reason it might not be the only reason
/r/seduction21/08/20 12:07 AM
1

You have nothing to be ashamed of. A lot of guys don't make women cum. I'm just pointing out your potential, what with your natural stamina.
/r/seduction21/08/20 12:05 AM
2

I can only cum from masturbating so it just ends up with me fucking till I get tired. Man you're equipped to be a God tier lover, but you also said: hell no, I'm not eating her out. There is nothing in it for me So it's clear that practicing your craft is not something you consider beneficial. You will never master the art until that changes.
/r/seduction20/08/20 09:18 PM
12

Yeah, gotta text to meet. Think of it like the girl wants to meet, but she's screening for red flags. You basically gotta keep the conversation flowing to give her time to come to the conclusion that it's a good idea to see you in person. You don't want to demand a meeting too soon, but you're not there to talk about the weather either.
/r/seduction20/08/20 08:24 PM
1

You're saying that the hypothetical situation is a woman deciding to have sex with her ex without any guarantee of commitment. If she chose to do that, it wouldn't be a loophole to the "no sex before commitment" rule, it would just be a rule violation. Doing so with an ex is exactly equivalent to doing so with a random stranger, but hey whatever these rules are only meant to improve your life. If you decide to break them, it's entirely your choice and you're no less of a woman for pursuing sexua…
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/20 09:27 PM
3

If you want sex, take it. Just don't delude yourself into thinking it's anything more than sex. You are breaking the no sex before commitment rule, so you have to ask yourself why you chose to impose that rule on yourself and your relationships in the first place.
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/20 09:06 PM
21

If you bring it up, it will feel like you're rushing him into commitment just to check the box because you want to initiate sex. With this kind of conversation, rushing into it too early will scare him, especially if your motivation is just sex. He'll need time to confirm that you're commitment worthy. I think you should feel free to initiate this conversation when you feel the time is right, but if you tell a guy you're waiting for a specific promise, some guys will just promise whatever you wa…
/r/RedPillWomen10/07/20 03:00 PM
1

Oh this is that kind of conversation. You're just riled up, looking to insult me. I literally just succeeded at explaining my logic. You're having trouble following along, but that's not a failure on my part.
/r/BlackPillScience13/09/19 05:09 AM
1

>I get that you personally want proof of the latter correlation Subtle jabs like that are also frowned upon in science, at least insofar as they hinder polite discourse. I have no such hangup. Allow me to explain my point, and then we can revisit the implication that I'm fishing for a result. Body language is a method of expression. Rather than physical traits like the presence of balls, the hypothetical assumption is that female mice respond to the way male mice express themselves through body …
/r/BlackPillScience13/09/19 04:05 AM
1

Drsherbert posed a hypothetical where there is a correlation between those two factors, that's how.
/r/BlackPillScience12/09/19 06:54 PM
2

Possibly. I imagine there are social aspects at play as well.
/r/BlackPillScience10/09/19 03:25 PM
10

This is one of the few subs that does not promote an echo chamber. That's what draws me here.
/r/BlackPillScience10/09/19 03:19 PM
10

Perhaps. That would imply female mice are affected by personality traits more than looks.
/r/BlackPillScience10/09/19 04:12 AM
22

Neat. It mentions that males can measure their social standing by the stress levels of nearby females. Oddly, the article implies that looks were not the deciding factor. Females did not determine the value of males by looking at their balls, but rather by accurately assessing their testosterone levels some other way. Maybe those mice had beta personalities. Curious if the females might have been going off size differences, vocal cues, or pheromone scent.
/r/BlackPillScience10/09/19 03:15 AM
1

Long ring finger good
/r/BlackPillScience17/08/19 02:26 PM
5

Ayooo
/r/BlackPillScience17/08/19 01:49 PM
3

Call me a dipshit but it kinda looks like you posted anecdotal support of his argument along with several supporting scholarly sources. The fact that you disagree with him does not seem to follow.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/17 12:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter