TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

humankin Archive

View 0 posts and 330 comments by humankin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

My question is rhetorical :P
/r/MensRights30/10/14 07:43 AM
6

Why is it one-sided? Gamergate is about journalist corruption. The voice of the media is the voice of journalists, its owners, and bits and pieces from other people.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:56 AM
1

respondents self reported that they met the conditions for being victims of sexual assault This sentence is ambiguous. It reads like they were asked "have you experienced sexual assault?" even though it also could mean that conditions were listed and they agreed with them and the conditions equate to sexual assault. Proxies are often superior to directly asking the question you want to ask but the proxies have to actually answer that question. Their proxies did not. the data seems to speak to a …
/r/MensRights30/10/14 04:43 AM
1

You aren't exactly wrong but there's more than just love and lust. The Disney fantasy of love exists for some people but it wears off*. You can't get lovestruck with someone you just want to fuck and you don't necessary love them in the same way you love your wife of ten years. * Apparently after a year though for me it's shorter.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:12 AM
1

I expect 7 is common but 4 years is enough to get one child conceived, born and independent enough for the mother to have another child. 7 years is long enough for 2 children and maybe that's typical. I don't know how we could study this but ancestral patterns would be very nice to know.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:05 AM
1

Also, I recall reading a journal on the "excited" and "true love" state of a relationship as being high-stress, both physically and mentally I can personally confirm this. It's one of the best feelings in the world but I wouldn't describe it as happiness or contentment. It leaves you torn up. Further, it makes you insane so that's bad for anything long-term.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:03 AM
1

Seriously. I've been in exciting new relationships and I've been in love. They feel very different. Love means experiencing some or all of these symptoms: Abnormally elevated mood, inflated self-esteem, extravagant gift giving Tearfulness Loss of concentration and difficulty sleeping Lack of appetite Stress - high blood pressure, pain in chest and heart, acute insomnia; sometimes brought on by a "crush" Obsessive-compulsive disorder - Preoccupation and hoarding valueless but superstitiously reso…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 03:56 AM
2

Interesting! This follows research on racism though I haven't heard anything on gender differences in racism.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 11:50 PM
5

I imagine it has more to do with a lack of an anxiety sink.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 10:52 PM
1

Thanks
/r/MensRights28/10/14 03:43 PM
5

Do you have a blog? You have a lot of great ideas and portray them well and I'd love to see them more well-developed.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:55 AM
9

The way they calculate gender equality, if women are better off than men in some metric and worse off in another then only the worse off detracts. If men are worse off in every way then the result is perfect equality. There's a really fucking obvious ideological basis to gender equality metrics.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:53 AM
2

Right now MRAs are part of the solution. When the MRM succeeds at its core goals, continuing to exist in its previously successful form will do the same as feminism: cause problems.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:49 AM
5

Very, very few MRAs call America a matriarchy. Only feminists say that MRAs say that.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:48 AM
3

There's a reason feminists talk endlessly about the wage gap but not that women control half of all wealth and will control the majority soon as wealthy husbands die. The latter actually matters for large-scale social policy but the former personally affects voters and the members of e.g. NOW.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 05:46 AM
1

Honestly this sounds like a theory more plausible than true. Evidence with sway me but I doubt it exists. Men do, after all, care who their woman looks at. Maybe less but I'd need evidence.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 05:41 AM
3

Journalists write those articles and journalist corruption is what started gamergate. This is one case where it's legitimate to expect articles to underreport a movement's effects. They're going to lie because they are protecting their personal power.
/r/MensRights28/10/14 02:21 AM
8

Huh. That's true - reddit has aged from early 20's to late 20's. Basically straight from where their female peers are pre-wall to post-wall.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:39 AM
3

Seems to be about scarcity of positive attributes. BB is so common that it doesn't do shit to attract pre-wall women. How effective is AF in poor countries? I hear stories of American and European men marrying foreign women way above their native SMV. Those women could be with much more alpha men. This has no effect on how men need to act but it could be that the specific sexual strategies used in TRP are really only applicable in the Western world even if the core insights are universally appli…
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:34 AM
3

Done right, it's counter-signalling his relationship value.
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 01:28 AM
2

You're projecting. Blame and "owed" weren't brought up.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 07:53 PM
7

He was framing CBC's actions as bigotry in that vein. I think it's a good tactic precisely because BDSM and homosexuality are both gross to most people but it's no longer acceptable to discriminate from homosexual behavior.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 02:01 AM
36

To a feminist, alliances are one-way.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 01:57 AM
3

High school-style education barely beats out low-involvement homeschooling. Seriously, getting virtually no "formal" education gets a 17-18 year old to an 11th grade education. Spending those 12 years in class each day only gains a single year. Teenagers that feel like class is pointless are the rational ones... and I say this not having been one of those teenagers. We could probably match our current education effectiveness by not mandating any school after like 14 but providing the means to le…
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 01:52 AM
4

College sex skews toward the top men - the median partner count for women in college is higher than men in college.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/14 12:03 AM
2

The key is to promote groupthink of the means to be right instead of "The Truth". True beliefs can be distorted more easily than effective algorithms for discerning truth from falsehood.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:14 PM
24

Feminists say that men are upset with feminism because they see losing their male privilege as being oppressed. Yet more evidence that feminist "oppression" is always projection.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:10 PM
8

Isn't that like a cosmetic surgery ad?
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:07 PM
4

It's a little sad to see a pretty face wasted in obesity, leaving her sadder and the men she's with less content.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:06 PM
2

It's crazy though. Rapists brought to trial get convicted more often than not. Feminists keep saying that rapists rarely get brought to justice so more and more women are going to be raped and figure "why go to the police? They won't do anything about it." Of course the real crazy is that this helps feminism the movement as it hurts women because the worse women are off except in regards to power, the more powerful feminism is.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 08:02 PM
18

The next stage is being confused when people say these things with apparent sincerity.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 07:59 PM
2

You appear earnest so I'll be honest: this is rhetoric. AWALT is necessary for most men to stop idealizing women and treat them like people. It means going through anger and bitterness but those phases end. This kind of talk is going to rub you the wrong way when you interpret it in the context of your perspective instead of the perspective of the intended audience.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/14 07:57 PM
2

he'd have other qualities (tall) I suspect this is why every feminist guy I know it comfortably above average and the greater majority are over 6'.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 03:04 AM
3

Shitty skin? Eat better ffs, and put some makeup on This also improves shitty hair.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 02:59 AM
1

80% or w/e of women. Bad luck makes some women's lives worse than most men's even if it's it's uncommon.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 02:55 AM
5

Most girls are emotional vampires. Many grow out of it after high school. Some make posts on r/2x.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 02:53 AM
1

I don't. Not even for shaming or anything - she just isn't worth getting riled up about. If I were her friend I'd care but I'm not and I kind of doubt we would get along well enough to be friends. Millions of girls have the same essential trouble and helping them is insignificant next to my other priorities. It's sad (suboptimal - whatever word) but it really only matters to her and the solution is for her to woman the fuck up and make herself a wise enough person that her validation barely regi…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 02:51 AM
2

I think he's talking about relationship "market" value and SMV without defining them as separate. Also something about betabux value being a woman's SMV divide by about ten grand/year.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 02:31 AM
3

Danny DeVito or Steve Buscemi are men. It's much easier in a lot of ways for men who are ugly than women who are ugly. Haha an example of being technically correct but missing the point. It is easier for ugly men than for ugly women. Ugly men can improve their SMV much more than can women. The kicker is that this requires work. Lazy women have is much easier than lazy men.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/14 02:23 AM
3

Are you powertalking, joking or are you really that much of a tool? correctly Value judgment aka you're either attempting to manipulate others or you're one of the manipulated.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 06:13 AM
7

I know this place is pretty anti-PC but why the hell would you or your friends say "nigger"? Saying the word when its a lyric of a song or "nigga" I can understand, "nigger", not so much. COD players Using her because you don't want to be seen as racist is as stupid as how white girls actively go for black guys because they want to be seen as progressive. Both are racist. Stupid or effective?! Keep in mind that he's suggesting using the anti-race card to shut up the kind of people that try to us…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/14 06:05 AM
7

She'd need fluffers to keep the train running smoothly.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/14 12:27 AM
2

IIRC the claim was that proportionally more women watch certain types of porn than men. Fewer women watch porn so even if (to make up a number) 5% of gay porn watchers are women, that's still (again, made up) 90% of women porn watchers. Men still make up 95% of gay porn watchers but that's only (fake) 1% of male porn watchers.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 06:39 PM
2

Has ANY woman ever showed you with pride, her library? I suspect that the sort of woman intelligent enough to make use of a personal library is also the sort of woman whose neurotically talked themselves into hiding their intellectual interests out of fear that men will find them intimidating or just hate smart girls. This isn't helped by feminists saying men feel this way in their campaign to make women hate men.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 06:29 AM
3

One of the reasons why it's advantageous to separate the sexes during schooling.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 06:26 AM
-3

How do you think she's worth a damn, RP wise? She's parroting the same solipsistic drivel as every other mainstream feminist. Everything else is her projecting her frustration-inspired misandry onto male Nice Guys. Very fucking few Nice Guys hate women because they don't have feminism telling them how terrible women are. Their trouble is thinking too highly of women - it's a completely different way of being retarded.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 04:29 AM
11

Because they're really zombies just trying to trap you alone to eat your brains! Come on man, give some reason for your vague dire warnings.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 10:39 PM
9

No, he did hold frame. You may never have been sufficiently thirsty to know this but if you're beta enough, you fuck up this kind of interaction by trying to anticipate what the woman wants and acting that way. This is the bare minimum of frame holding but it's still him sticking to what he wants instead of what he thinks she wants. It's sad but it's true.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 10:38 PM
12

Yup. Most of my romantic issues in high school amounted to fucking up when all I had to do was go along with it.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 10:36 PM
3

without narrating I'd love to see more of this here. The BP mindset is a narrative. The RP mindset is beyond narrative by not conforming on instinct. Passing shit tests is almost entirely about treating narrative as the nonsense it is instead of truth itself. Newbies need a new narrative to break from their old but the goal should be to get beyond.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 08:48 PM
3

Social conditioning is built on instinct. Feminists only work to empower women, not craft a sustainable social order. So women are less and less constrained so they prefer alphas more. No instinct is being subverted or directed to prefer any particular man. Only to fear men and disregard their value to women. Instead feminists seek to convince incels and betas that their suffering is fair and even feeling bad for it is wrong.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 06:40 PM
1

Hmm. The yaoi girls I've known were more into the sex part so I generalized since it seemed about the same. TIL!
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 07:55 AM
1

The same is also true of dogs. I bet it's true to some degree of other social animals as well.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 02:27 AM
11

A hypothesis as to why: The people who love you the most will be the ones you rely on should you fail. You're also the person that will hold them up should they fail, especially in old age. This expands even to career choice. Parents in certain cultures prefer their kids to take the well-beaten paths to financial success because their kids are a retirement plan.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 01:49 AM
2

That sounds like a case of contrast bias only the comparison was between what is seen and what is extrapolated. Of course people would cognitively fail in this way outside of the lab so it's still useful research.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 01:10 AM
10

Women are EXTREMELY present-minded In this context yes but "living in the present" is definitely not something women are commonly good at as seen by women being more neurotic than men*. Men don't do well here either but better than women, especially in the outliers. * This was empirically determined. Look up OCEAN personality typing.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 01:08 AM
5

My experience affirms this. The most sex-negative feminist I know was pretty heavily into bondage. This is a girl that tried to shame me out of watching porn.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 12:58 AM
2

Surprised by the gay porn being at the top of the list Fucking yaoi dude: Yaoi Yaoi (properly [ja.o.i], informally /jaʊi/), also known as Boys' Love (BL), is a Japanese genre of fictional media focusing on homoerotic romantic or sexual relationships between male characters, aimed at a female audience and usually created by female authors. Most girls who geek out on anime seem to be into seeing guys fuck.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 12:56 AM
3

Reminds me of Ron Swanson's second wife.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 12:55 AM
9

Style qualm: don't use redundant adjectives. It reads as an amateur attempt at rhetorically strong writing.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 01:29 AM
1

You are a fountain of knowledge, generic_name. Thank you! Here's a quick theory. People learn through feedback loops. [...] That makes sense. Men and women are cognitively extremely similar so one root cause of our hierarchy-creating behavior is more likely than two. It's also pretty obvious that men get more immediate feedback to their shitty behavior because other men are more direct both in our shitty behavior and in reacting to it in others. In this case women's hierarchy-forming is a byprod…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 10:32 PM
1

what do you mean? Men tend to form hierarchies as well, I'd say more so then men. Right but I'm talking about women, not men. Male hierarchies make sense to me because we form them for material gain and protection. Everyone benefits when the best hunter is in charge of the hunting party even though he gains the most status from his position. I don't see what women gain from their pecking orders. Especially how brutal they are when they first hit puberty. I get that they're fighting for the best …
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 09:29 PM
4

Tru dat.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 08:51 PM
4

Rationalization is boundless. It's why we have to rely on empiricism to differentiate truth from fiction.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:22 PM
3

Their programming doesn't permit it.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 07:21 PM
1

Women definitely form hierarchies of some sort. Why do they do it?
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 06:19 PM
2

Try the asktrp or seduction subreddits
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 02:37 AM
5

Can't tell of serious. Dude already has one.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 02:30 AM
10

he considers a snickers bar a ideal post workout. It's the same as a snickers bar any other time: source. Emphasizing post-workout is broscience aka plausible-sounding-but-wrong. The technical term is "belief bias" (yes it's named that poorly). edit: This goes into more depth.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/14 12:35 AM
22

It's a fatherhood program that's positive. It doesn't take much to be abnormally good to men in general these days.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 05:55 PM
2

Eternal September. But such is success... I still find a lot of great posts and comments here. Compared to most communities this place is a gold mine. That being said, it often helps to focus on the endorsed contributors' contributions.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 06:54 PM
2

I know and understand that, but don't you think it's a little bit ridiculous to say that 99% of women simply aren't worth committing to because they've had sex at least once? Fairness is a bit silly. This is really a risk-reward calculation. Men gain very little in marriage and take on great risk. Women that have had sex before are much bigger risks than virgins/women who've only slept with the man they marry. Actually nevermind. I've read more of your responses now and I can see that you are ar…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 02:47 AM
1

It's unenlightened to dismiss someone as worthless or however else in a general sense because there's no general sense of worthiness in any way... but I'm not sure if you are arguing against calling promiscuous women sluts on moral grounds or if you're denouncing the extreme dismissal of women from those in the bitter phase/the rhetoric used to knock women off the pedestal in the eyes of the BP and recently awakened. I don't care for moral discussion of that sort but I do agree that a greater pr…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 02:41 AM
15

You are inconsistent. Why do you believe you are allowed to tell us what we are allowed to demand from our voluntary interactions? Women are not owed commitment and intimacy from men any more than omegas are owed sex from women.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 05:30 PM
3

This is how I image eccentric sultans were (are?). They do weird shit and their women put up with it because social and material factors make it difficult for them to do otherwise. Which is to a less extreme exactly how married men are in much of the West,: not rolling over is misogyny and divorce is one way to lose the majority of your wealth. If you have kids then this still carries over since under patriachies men "owned" their (legitimate) children.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 12:11 AM
5

The result of him being overly critical is that this girl for sure won't try to "introduce" any of her ugly friends to him again. The other result is that she might not introduce any attractive friends either. If OP has enough plate sources then he gains from turning one source from inefficient to efficient or gone.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/14 06:30 PM
1

Totally. Thanks for prompting me to think about this stuff. I realize I didn't say anything positive but that's only because I forget to do so. I did really like your post.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 11:26 PM
5

How much do men get on average and what's the distribution?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 05:13 AM
1

Whenever someone asserts that love is x or love is y I just get fucking bored. Defining words is rhetoric and rhetoric is dull. I'm not looking to be convinced here I'm looking to learn what's useful or what's true. I skimmed the rest and it's more of the same sort of rhetoric.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 05:12 AM
13

Real Men ignore highly predictive evidence. You want to be a Real Man, right?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 03:57 AM
1

Or use dates. Women are definitely reporting less happiness now.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 03:49 AM
1

It's actual art. Human emotion made into human action. The near-mania of joy from relief expressed in human intimacy. Emotion strong enough to overcome the lack of trust we have for each other to actually kiss a complete stranger. It's sexual assault but the context makes it difficult to hurt from it. You have to want to suffer to turn becoming an icon of a momentous occasion for millions of people and a large portion of humanity into personal suffering. SJWs are up to that task, of course, but …
/r/MensRights08/10/14 09:11 AM
1

"Ad" is short for "advertisement". There doesn't seem to be any etymological reason for "ad" instead of "add" except that the "d" was an addition.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 08:59 AM
2

It's weird, right? You get in a fight with a guy and you know him well enough to deal with him. He's a puzzle you solved and now you just build your plans with his character in mind.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 08:07 AM
8

Whenever I see these posts I want to tell OP that his focus is still plugged in even if it isn't BP in the precise sense we use here. I don't know how I could get that across but I like how you say "True or not", address why his frame is inferior in terms he understands and likely values, then point to the path he needs to walk. To OP it looks like that path is how to fulfill his desires in his current worldview but it's also a way to shed his BP worldview. Thanks for giving me some insight in h…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 05:01 AM
4

How'd you misspell "you're" and "their" in quick succession?
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 10:01 PM
3

As men flock from university, university education will lose its import. Men who want to create will find a way to do so, as they always have.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:56 PM
4

More that disenfranchisement leads to frustration. If the social order doesn't fulfill a person's needs then their self-interest is to go outside or undermine the social order. I reckon what we're seeing now with MGTOW is men opting for the peaceful path but it's still a reaction to a failing social contract.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:14 PM
1

Wishful thinking. That makes sense.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 04:32 PM
8

No. They're trying to be inclusive to transgender people but the only way they know how to be incisive is to exclude others. Usually common white men.
/r/TheRedPill07/10/14 03:06 PM
4

Young men unable to be with women, I expect, leads to crime, unrest, and violence. Marriage is different.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 06:53 AM
1

I'm strongly leftist but don't associate much with other leftists because of that sort of bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 02:25 AM
2

I don't know. Paying a hitman to kill is definitely a crime so paying a kidnapper to kidnap should be too. But yeah realistically she's only guilty of perjury. The State doesn't see its interference as proxy violence despite being literally that.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 02:20 AM
1

It differs by woman. Some only befriend men while seeking a new beau and drop the rest after. Some can be real friends.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 04:24 PM
4

You're with them or you're against them. They're willing to piss off the reasonable "moderates" because they think they gain more from radicalization. Assuming they think about the ramifications of their choices at all.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:26 AM
4

Don't forget that women and children were lumped together even though I've never heard anyone bring up children lying about rape as any kind of serious problem or even mentioned. The only related concern I've seen anyone bring up is mothers lying about the father molesting their children so she can get a more favorable divorce outcome or hurt her former spouse even more. Here, she was described as a mother of small children. They wanted her to be sympathized with and they wanted people to associ…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:23 AM
3

Seems pretty fucking violent to me. She arranged for the man to be kidnapped and incarcerated. Possibly subjected to rape or gang rape while incarcerated. Non-violent? it was probably the most violent experience of the guy's life if he hadn't been sent to prison before. Non-violent. Because her crime wasn't false accusation, it was something like wasting police time. Like she'd just crank called them a few times or something. Victimless crime right? didn't hurt anyone. Exactly!
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:20 AM
3

If it has been proven that a woman falsely accused a man of rape, then the sentence should be way harsher than three and a half years in jail. This woman tried to utterly annihilate this man's life as well as sending him to jail with the high risks associatiated with being a rapist in there. It's proxy kidnapping, defamation, and possibly assault, battery and rape, depending on what happens in prison. That carries a potential life sentence in some states.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:19 AM
5

Attempting to frame someone should get you the same sentence they would have had to serve. This seems like a no brainer (emphasis mine) I disagree. Framing someone for a crime is using the legal system as a proxy for your violence. It's kidnapping with a firearm and, depending on what happens in prison, acting as the mastermind behind assault, battery, rape, etc. I believe that makes one an accomplice but I'm not well-versed in the particulars of the law in the case of proxies and when the maste…
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:16 AM
6

This isn't saudi arabia where acknowledging that you were raped is admitting to adultery if the accused isn't found guilty.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:05 AM
56

Little boys get browbeat by women and on television they see grown men browbeat by women. Many have fathers browbeaten by their wives. It can make men never realize that the rope tying their foot to a post was only strong in their youth.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 01:22 AM
4

I have my own thoughts on that. I'd like to read yours when you compile them.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/14 01:18 AM
2

s/spacial/spatial Makes little sense but that's how it's spelled.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 10:52 PM
3

Did they not really believe they would be able to affect men this much?
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 10:45 PM
1

Again reaffirming the projecting nature of feminism.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 04:54 PM
2

Is it alpha/beta, etc.? Do whatever you want. Just weigh the pros and cons rationally and don't equivocate with your irrational impulses. Others have addressed the specifics of prostitutes in particular more than I can.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 05:11 AM
6

Yeah. He's not short but that's it: 5'10" is dead average for the US and average/close to average for the UK.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 05:05 AM
1

Look at it as advice for intermediates.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 05:03 AM
46

I take it there're few enough women in the military that the top guy has time to fuck them all so that's precisely what happens.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/14 12:54 AM
2

They wouldn't have anything to say if they weren't thinking about it.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 06:51 AM
1

Other women don't care and few men fall outside the two camps of putting up with just about anything from a woman and not putting up with cheating.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 06:49 AM
2

I comment elsewhere without TRP jargon but I use this account. Few people actually go through post histories, especially without prompting.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 06:46 AM
2

I agree that feminism isn't leftist but it looks like leftism. Feminists think they are tearing down the masculine system of oppression, the Patriarchy. Its non-existence and feminist statism means they're actually totalitarian aka non-leftist. Unfortunately most leftists think feminism is leftist. What's really annoying is that most people think leftism is liberalism.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:31 AM
0

More than that, she hit puberty as an attractive international star. The men in her life are the relatively few men with enough privilege to be above most of the problems most men face.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:19 AM
1

It's worked for most of a century. Why stop?
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:14 AM
2

As much as you may wish otherwise, 17 year olds fuck each other.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:08 AM
2

guess what, nearly everyone has sex. maybe it's time to stop pretending a nude pic getting online is the worst fate in the world. You can't as easily lie about how many men you've slept with if there's hard evidence.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 03:06 AM
2

All they want is to empower women! Forever. Without bounds or discretion.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:57 AM
2

repeating no over and over Bitch, ignore them. If they keep at it, blocker apps are cheaper than coffee. If they hound with you in person, cry a little to a cop or campus security or whoever.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 02:13 AM
9

Likely they're heavily impacted by spin. If the post was from the woman then she'd emphasize how she feels and downplay her actions. Commentators would be in a huff at how terrible her boyfriend is and how she owes it to herself to just end the relationship already. Assuming she's unsavvy enough to mention the nudes at all - much more likely she'd paint a picture of her boyfriend becoming controlling or emotionally abusive without any mention of her part.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/14 02:12 AM
5

She doesn't want her victimhood to define her.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:42 AM
6

That isn't a great analogy. Much better would be if you said he couldn't take the television but he insisted so you said sure, go ahead. I'd also include that you never asked the stranger to leave.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:39 AM
2

Sadly that would actually be better than where feminism is pushing. Documentation reduces women's power because then they can't spin ambiguity in their favor.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/14 03:37 AM
4

It's the same with sexual harassment at work: accuse first and they can't do the same because it's "retaliation".
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:17 PM
20

What immediately jumped to my mind: the lack of strong men to absolve women's anxiety and women not seeking out a life with a strong man - just a night.
/r/TheRedPill29/09/14 05:09 PM
0

It's the kind of powertalk tools use or more precisely this is the internalizing of memes whose effect is to radicalize women against men and strengthen feminism (but not necessary women's rights activism). Trying to parse the words themselves, even as idioms, is mistaking her speech for straight talk. Women are socialized to engage in gametalk anyway since gametalk is how women build friendships*. Feminism is almost pure powertalk. Here, this woman engaged in gametalk with her yoga friends whic…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 11:09 PM
5

Pure status seeking and empowered to be terrible because they're desired. I imagine there's also a lot of (actual) privilege involved but I've only heard beauty standards whining w.r.t light-skinned women south of the US.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 10:55 PM
7

That is a great point. Her escalating would have left her "responsible, good job and kind hearted" beta with a niggling doubt but he'd still trust her. It's lose-lose but the disutility difference is huge.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 07:05 PM
6

People do lie to their doctor about their health habits. A lot. It's funny in the sad way that cynics are optimistic when they say all people are inherently self-serving. In reality people rarely meet so high a standard.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 07:02 PM
0

I get the same but it snuck up on me. A few years ago I mentioned my introversion to some fairly new friends (about a year) and they were confused. Apparently it only took a passive effort over a few years for me to appear "extroverted" the American sensibilities.
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 04:46 AM
0

Everything you say is true in cultures that heavily favor extroversion. What about introvert-favored cultures?
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 04:42 AM
6

I'm going to guess you are extroverted. It's a very comfortable opinion for you that one. Yeah, you're a dumbass. Introversion and extroversion aren't causally connected to how much a person trusts airing their beliefs to others. Whether or not a person is introverted is largely genetically determined. Introverts get more excited in social settings so they'll get anxious around others after a while. Extroverts can't excite themselves much so they can't stand to be alone for too long. American so…
/r/TheRedPill28/09/14 04:39 AM
1

If the law is literally that any amount of alcohol in a woman's system while she has sex means she was raped and we know that everyone has alcohol in their system at all times even if it's just a single molecule, then women are always raped when they have sex. I don't think the law actually uses prior probability in its guilt calculations though.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:57 AM
1

You don't need to directly measure something to know it's true with more certainty than a reasonable doubt :)
/r/MensRights25/09/14 11:43 PM
1

Weird! I wasn't even considering economic impact or a change on national identity.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 05:19 PM
1

I've seen women respond to the suffering of their male children by feminism by rejecting it and sometimes even opposing it. Once a few percent do so, it's a mainstream sentiment so common people will adopt it in parts.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 05:18 PM
6

Almost all feminists will stop being feminist as soon as it harms them personally or even just the men in their lives they actually love, such as their children. Feminism has an end date when boys' lives are systematically ruined where their mothers can see them hurting. The current set of rules being forced on universities makes me think feminism has about 20 years before the backlash has serious political clout. It could happen sooner if something causes feminist women to lose status more than…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 07:28 AM
1

How easy is it, exactly? It might be possible to get positive spin through their zeal even if they want to continue their bigotry.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:19 AM
1

There was an altercation so the party with the least utility to the master of the house was removed. Women (especially pretty ones) get entitled because they are in fact privileged above most men.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:15 AM
2

He looked around himself. People haven't really changed so he continues to seem prescient.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:14 AM
1

I wonder if there're any bacteria at all in the body that produce even a little bit of ethanol.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:12 AM
1

That sounds like a poorly run frat. The ones I've been to that host drunken parties have always had a gender ratio with more women than men. You cant even get in without a vagina - either your own or by proxy - unless you're a brother. Or sneaky since their security is laughable if you don't go in the front door.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:06 AM
3

When stated that way, yes, it is almost universally rejected. Most radical feminists wouldn't say or believe outright that men are moral failures in all cases and under all choices. They have no concrete idea at all how men can avoid being Wrong but that's just because: That's they're underlying rule. They don't even admit it to themselves because people don't commonly admit hypocrisy or utter uncharitability to themselves. But we aren't constrained by having a feminist's ego: we can judge femin…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 07:04 AM
1

The actual answer is that people believe men are more destructive so people actually interpret male actions (or potential actions) as more destructive and women's as less. Humans really are that bad at thinking; this has been studied pretty well and is even named though I can't remember the name right now. The cause of this instance of human cognitive failure is harder to identify. I hesitate to chock it up to male physical superiority because in the past women have been known as destructive, es…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 06:59 AM
4

People rant about "cultural marxism" but the core idea is right - feminist theory puts men and women at odds by using the metaphor of capital vs labor classes and class conflict. In their view, men owe women so it's fair for women to take from men. That individually innocent men are harmed is, at worst, sad. It's a war though and a few enemy casualties means little when the enemy - men - have been careless with women's lives through institutionalized terror in violence including endemic rape. Bu…
/r/MensRights25/09/14 06:51 AM
3

Women give themselves to God when the Devil wants nothing more to do with them. Knoweth everyone that knows a 25 year-old woman pretty enough to fuck the hottest guys.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 06:34 AM
3

"Remember, men, we're fighting for this woman's honour; which is probably more than she ever did." Hahahahaha this is amazing.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 06:32 AM
1

Anger that persists beyond the moment is always an emotional attachment. I'm not just saying this rhetorically. Persistent emotion with an object (e.g. you) is an emotional attachment 100% of the time. Anger is often a mechanism to create separation between people but that means they aren't already separate.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 06:28 AM
13

Honest feminists believe that all male-female sex is rape by default because their beliefs necessitate it. Most feminists pick-and-choose how consistent they are because they actually really like fucking men and only someone heavily educated or carefully indoctrinated can rationalize themselves into believing that all men are actually rapists.
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 03:50 AM
1

Alcohol prohibition was literally society telling men they shouldn't drink because drunken men were causing women problems. This isn't ancient history and Jon Stewart is smart enough to make this connection if he bothered to think about it.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:10 AM
7

The fact that he doesn't give a single fuck about anything around him makes him the natural alpha of the group. Yup. His frame is nigh unbreakable. He knows what he wants because he's put care into crafting his environment. Attempts to alter his domain are met with resistance because he knows better than anyone else how he ought to live his life.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 06:07 AM
2

This suggests that there is an untapped market of men. You don't need to appeal to the masses if your niche is sustainably large.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 05:59 AM
1

Spoilers bro! But seriously, it's a sitcom. All alpha behavior is mischaracterized so the beta bullshit is what men pick up on as their best bet at love in this life.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/14 05:58 AM
1

Regardless, I thoroughly enjoyed the conversation, and am glad we wound up reaching an understanding. Me too.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:01 AM
1

I agree with you on all points but would add that I find his hostility refreshing solely for its direct honesty. I don't like that this has been framed as solely due to him retweeting a hashtag or whatever it's called.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:30 AM
5

Equivocating with feminists buys egalitarians nothing. Decades of failure of proto-MRAs are a testament to this facet of feminism.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:13 AM
1

Likely he is reacting to the juxtaposition in your first sentence. It sounds like you are putting forth the socially acceptable belief (in this space) so as to insinuate your true belief that he should have been punished if not so much as actually fired. That is what it looks like. I tell you this because I do not believe that was your intent.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:09 AM
2

I doubt it's outright universal but as a life strategy, many women are well-equipped to trade sex and beauty (as a status symbol) for access to the various resources of men including physical and social power. Even an ugly woman can bear excellent sons.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/14 08:41 PM
8

First I want to address how self-motivated she is. The unequal ability of one person to capitalize on another is a classic case of exploitation. This applies perfectly well to how women fare in marriage. Divorce is so grossly unbalanced against men that marriage becomes unequal by nature. A man has to be solidly superior to a woman for their marriage to operate effectively because she can always have him pay lawyers for her to divorce him then walk away with alimony and any children (+ support) …
/r/TheRedPill21/09/14 06:16 AM
-1

man I hope you're right since then I'll be fucking above my pay grade (metaphorically. she's 100% into alpha fucks 0% bb) Anyway, I think we can agree that he should serve his interests. You've got a concrete plan of how he should do that so I defer to you. Not that it matters since I have no authority and only the power of my words here. Also I barely care but shitposting is a side benefit to getting drunk.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 04:06 AM
2

I don't understand what you want. Do you want an explanation for why women do that? Why people (optionally, men or women) put up with it or consider it normal? Why the dude let her get away with it? I'm drunk so I'll answer all of them Why do women mock loser men? I don't really understand why people mock those they can get away with mocking. I understand that it makes them feel good. My best guess is petty political thought. I do know that it is effective under some circumstances but I don't ex…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 03:40 AM
9

Ooh I do! She's 50-something and learned the building of capital from her mother. Also super old-school feminist but I don't hold that against her since she's not a misandrist, just misguided about how the sexes fare. As for young women, only if I consider those still on their parents' dime. It's stable even if it isn't really in the spirit.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 03:28 AM
1

It'd be more in his interest to say something that causes her to fuck him now. The justification is that she intends to use him as a wallet later.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 03:27 AM
1

Do you have a source for that? I've never seen anything that gave that breakdown and I just took an online quiz that affirms marriage-is-retarded for me and I scored about average.
/r/TheRedPill19/09/14 03:00 AM
1

Yes, gait meaning how one walks. I don't do anything specifically for my gait but good posture and confidence are probably sufficient.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 06:50 AM
1

Huh. I know that there are many restrictions on what one can ask (say?) in a job interview but those are just the usual protected class stuff. It sounds like so long as no one sues on this then it's fine and if they do then you need to show that yours was a reasonable measure of job performance. That might be easy to difficult... I have no idea and I think a lawyer is needed to know. Thanks! I really don't want to fuck this shit up.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 03:35 AM
1

Appearance and gait are the first two traits noticed so they're what form first impressions, triggered the anchor effect. Turning out to be amazing changes opinion but getting an accurate rating is difficult after the first one since "second" impressions only happen when the context of the social interaction is very different. This is obviously exploitable to a person's benefit so it shouldn't be depressing. Just find new people if your first impression is poor. The world is damn near overflowin…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 03:19 AM
5

illegal for companies to use apptitude tests during hiring Wait, what? Literally every software company I've ever heard of uses tests in the hiring process. A brief googling shows that aptitude tests are common. I have to call bullshit. Lower n-count I recall reading that women are more likely to experiment with lesbianism if they did not go to college so I assume n-count is higher for non-collegiate women. I'm guessing n-count inversely correlates with wealth as well but I'm not confident. Ever…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:43 AM
12

That shit surprised me when I was in high school too. A 20 year-old guy dating my 15 year-old friend and it was just like whatever. I knew he was a weak person but I didn't fully grasp that that was why he was hooking up with teenager girls: they're thirsty for "men" even a year out of their peer group, including the women his age wanting older men, so my friend was probably the only girl he could get with.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:38 AM
11

She's straight projecting the qualities she finds attractive in men onto men's preferences for women. So we know that she wants a drug dealer and/or thuggish alpha. I wonder how generally this applies?
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:33 AM
10

Emotions are cognitive heuristics telling us how we should react by default. Getting stressed because your boss belittles you is an excellent response to get you to drop the civilization narrative you use to rationalize your cowardly behavior and get a new job or otherwise GTFO. On the other hand, emotions tell us that there aren't literally a thousand women we could get with within a day's walking distance so we should throw our attention at one mediocre woman. It's suboptimal to always obey my…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:31 AM
20

I wouldn't even mind opinionated if they consistently had good opinions but it seems to always mean that they won't give up an argument if they feel they're right and if they're wrong, bring up irrelevant shit. A man can hold frame but these women are advertising that they give frequent shit tests! If 20's as a not-ugly woman weren't dating on easy mode then "opinionated" women would be stereotyped as basement-dwelling virgins.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:21 AM
9

This shit is incredibly important in business. People will try to fuck you in the unpleasant way. Don't ever exchange money (even a cent) or significant labor without knowing the legalities. Judges can only act on what they know and rely heavily on laws that aren't always well-written and sure as hell aren't common sense.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 02:17 AM
23

This definitely happens. I have a friend that always had a place to stay. The women were 4s though.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 07:45 PM
2

Do you have a specific refutation or just condemnation?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 04:09 AM
1

No shit but he presented his stupid-ass decision in a negative light. Why are you explaining why what he did was wrong? Do people here really need the basics spelled out in excruciating detail? It's fucking weird.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 04:49 PM
4

How are multiple people thinking what you've described here was meant to be seen in a positive light?
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 08:24 AM
-1

Now, blue pill time. A good part of the reason this works the way it does is that men are (generally) physically stronger than women, and could easily rape them. Whatever anyone says, when a woman gets in bed with you she is trusting at some level that you will respect her wishes and, ya know, not rape her. Men can have sex with a random stranger who approaches them and be reasonably confident that if things go south they'll be able to get themselves out of the situation (there are exceptions, o…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 04:48 AM
1

Or because women benefit from having children from many men of dubious SMV if they can't get a single man with excellent SMV. A single high-performing son is worth much more than a woman can ever get on her own so why wouldn't they roll the dice with many fathers? So long as women actually fuck the middling SMV men, society keeps marching on. It's when they are secure enough to only fuck the best men that we get herbivore men and suicide bombers.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 07:55 PM
9

Which is normal for humans. 4ish years will get you a single child old enough to not need constant supervision. Maybe you have more children but mostly the woman gets bored betting so much on a single man's genes unless he is top tier. The modern world is different but only in incentives, not natural inclinations.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 07:52 PM
7

This is true. I avoid using /s because it completely ruins humor. It's harder to use dry humor correctly in text but it's also rewarding when you pull it off. A hidden tag would be a good compromise.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 07:47 PM
1

My mom never did this but she had to put her single mother friend in her place for doing this to me. I handled it with uncharacteristic stoicism but still it was childish of her
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 04:58 AM
1

edit - But now I think about it Buffy breaking loose from the shackles of an old white man society probably is supposed to be empowering to women. The ending wasn't even subtle about this.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 04:27 AM
2

Are you sure it isn't white women making their lives miserable? We now know that it's definitely women doing most of the slut shaming and they do it for mate guarding. Actually that makes it likely that you're right but the apparent evidence isn't sufficient to strongly differentiate between these hypotheses. It's possible that white women slut shame simply because people mate guard and it's possible women specifically engage in that behavior. Do you have sources?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 08:03 AM
7

Half asians can be really attractive. And if you're not, well, you can still get a 7 if you're awesome. Plus you'll be awesome. Real talk: your baseline happiness level has little to do with your overall well-being. Practice happiness improvement and you'll be happier. Brood over what you lack and you'll be sadder. I wonder why we don't teach this shit to kids. Too much competition with religion maybe?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 07:59 AM
6

White men are a status symbol for Asian women.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 07:53 AM
3

Since we're conjecturing here, I'll add this: selective pressures applied to black slaves both during the voyage over and once here were selected for constitution and strength. Physical power was more useful to the people controlling who lives and who dies and, I assume, who breeds. So you'd expect blacks in America to be more masculine on average. I don't know how intense this selective pressure was and I don't remember exactly how long it lasted. I do know that non-American blacks don't seem t…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 07:51 AM
1

I disagree with how wikipedia is handling this but I'm glad you've put forth the effort to tell us the situation.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:08 AM
1

Is it even possible to enforce? The NSA could do it but somehow I doubt they do what wikipedia admins say.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:07 AM
1

a tit for tat approach will not help Have you read the wikipedia article on this? Tit-for-tat is the optimal strategy in the iterated prisoner's dilemma. The power imbalance between entrenched editors and the readers means it isn't a prisoner's dilemma but that isn't actually an argument in favor of wikipedia's status quo.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:02 AM
2

You should support rationality. [lesswrong](lesswrong.com) and related communities are pushing themselves to combat their biases and learn how to make good real-world decisions. One eventual result is that the kinds of authority-before-truth wikipedia promotes will lose dominance as people learn how to evaluate a person's trustworthiness without relying on the authority of the mob or institutions.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 03:00 AM
2

Me too. I don't mind that wikipedia's treatment of men's rights isn't truly neutral since I don't expect human editors to rise above their biases to that level. I do mind that the bias is so strong that the men's rights page has outright lies and we are actively prevented from doing anything about it.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:54 AM
1

Now I want to read both to compare. Sadly I anticipate you being right or nearly right.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:50 AM
2

Well no, wikipedia has a pro-feminist bias. It's also got a pro-academia bias but I'll bet that those are at least a little bit causally independent. I'd like to point out that the academic foundation of feminism is an example of how publishing papers isn't necessarily correlated with understanding reality.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:48 AM
2

It's probably safer that wikipedia has no spine. Fucking rationalwiki has a spine and it's only used to bias people against anything an American democrat would consider wrong.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:36 AM
4

Your formatting is whack, daddy-o.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:34 AM
1

Thank you for the thoughtful response... I'm glad people liked it. When debating climate deniers there's a quick and easy "all in one" source we can access to counter opposing views - http://www.skepticalscience.com/argument.php[1] Does anybody know of a site like this on the interwebs for us non-academics? No idea. I'd love such a site though.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:27 AM
1

Oddly I was not. My mother is RP and actually encouraged me to play the field when I was just starting to date. Probably she didn't like how trashy my girlfriend was but still. I don't know man. I have some kind of moral autism where I take other people's projected intentions at face value. It's completely terrible for a child to grow up in our culture and actually believe (not belief in belief) that other people hold the values they claim to hold.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 02:25 AM
1

Being a bad person isn't a mental disorder.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:15 AM
22

I was beta as shit before puberty too. Based on the other comments here I take it that I'm in the (extreme?) minority.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 02:30 AM
1

That's a good point.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:13 AM
1

Haha well, I get my ideas where I get my ideas. Narrative control, frame, "staying on message", whatever.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 02:12 AM
27

Don't. Or more precisely, respond by changing the direction of discourse. Remember not to be reactive or you're a sucker! Anyway: They're poisoning the well: Poisoning the well (or attempting to poison the well) is a rhetorical device where adverse information about a target is pre-emptively presented to an audience, with the intention of discrediting or ridiculing everything that the target person is about to say. Poisoning the well is exploiting anchoring: Anchoring or focalism is a cognitive …
/r/MensRights09/09/14 08:14 AM
2

no it isn't, it will be just a more perverse game. Western men are masochistic little bitches, to manouver them into place you don't act nice, you act like a bitch, like the abusive mother that never loved him. In eastern europe you play the loving girlfriend part until you manouver him into the provider position. There is no cooperation, just a less masochistic game. I wasn't thinking eastern europe so much as parts of asia and the middle east but that does match how my friend's relationship wo…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 07:24 AM
3

Many young women WANT to be traditional women, they just got cheated by their mothers and learned NOTHING. So much this. Mommy never learned because she was a rebel. Grandma was a hippy, is in a home, dead, or just not around. We don't teach our daughters how to be women and we don't teach our sons how to be men. Feminism fights for a certain level of satisfaction for women as it replaces the past satisfaction but does nothing for men. Seriously, ask a feminist how men ought to be. You will neve…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 07:15 AM
-6

I'm not sure how to visualize such a society since reproduction isn't obvious. Maybe this variant: if women weren't attractive to men. Women's power is almost entirely from men being programmed to want them. If that weren't so then women would be treated like physically and emotionally weak men. Today women would call that misogyny but feminism would have no power because no one respects weak men. If it wasn't obvious: this also wouldn't be misogyny. It would be gender egalitarianism.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 07:09 AM
1

Related: A common mistake I see (and read) that expat men do, is to marry and take their near-perfect SE Asian girl to their Western world (home country) and expect them to retain their culture (being naturally submissive to a man). Over time, these girls are influenced by Western society and begin to act more and more entitled. In a matter of years, the guy now has a beautiful Asian doll who has transformed into a money-grubbing, back-stabbing cunt who's life now seems to be occupied with shit …
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 07:05 AM
2

There's likely a biological component but I suspect culture to be the primary cause. Western culture and especially the anglosphere privileges women over men. It is very much in the same sense as the nobility are privileged: women expect a certain level of treatment without regard for how men are treated. Even ugly and fat women expect this treatment, hence most of 2nd and 3rd wave feminism and the "fat is beautiful" nonsense. Remember: people cannot differentiate between misogyny and egalitaria…
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:58 AM
1

That's the privileged behavior feminists keep telling men about. Feminists just universally fail to recognize that they're projecting women's special treatment onto men.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:51 AM
1

Girls do in fact mature faster than boys. The lack of certain pressures until the Wall slows the sort of maturity we demand of men but that isn't a biological cause in itself.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:47 AM
3

This also may be why women sometimes loathe their men once they get off the pill.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:37 AM
1

The "give gold" words right next to the "reply" words. You'll need internetable monies though.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:36 AM
7

My list is a little different: 1) emotionaly available 2) honesty/loyalty 3) hard working 4) generous 5) caring 6) romantic 7) selfless listens to my bullshit won't cheat money money & signals high status to my girlfriends easy to control signals my high status to my girlfriends easy to control
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:35 AM
1

Did you post on the wrong account?
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 06:26 AM
1

Works fucking fantastic for me.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 08:39 PM
7

Body posture is non-verbal frame. This bears mention: frame is not communication. Calling body posture "non-verbal frame" is so wrong that it's not-even-wrong. Frame is framework is perspective. It's how you react to phenomena both external and internal to yourself. Weak or non-present frame means a person's way of choosing is easily edited by the people around them, making them a vessel for others' will. Those with strong frame do not easily have their will tainted and especially not outright r…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 07:59 AM
1

OP might believe that but it's unlikely. The attractiveness of youth in women is incredibly likely to be biological. Evopsych is difficult to use as evidence but I would be extremely surprised if the evidence were to show that preference for youth in women isn't heavily (>40%) influenced by evolution. I can only speculate as to why you are conflating fetishes with zero or no obvious benefit to evolutionary fitness with preference for youth since young women are definitely better mates. Fertility…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 07:48 AM
0

http://www.webmd.com/baby/features/fertility-101 Fertility peaks in your 20s. Most women hit their fertile peak between the ages of 23 and 31, though the rate at which women conceive begins to dip slightly in their late 20s. Around age 31, fertility starts to drop more quickly [...] Age 23 is about the ideal woman's age for men of all ages above, IIRC, 24. I don't know how fertility progresses before age 23 but it sounds like fertility steadily rises into age 23. If you for some reason want (two…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 07:30 AM
2

Are those the same women saying both? It's conceivable that non-slutty women attempt to distinguish themselves from the sluts that say things like "women's sex drives are as high as men's". Or perceived sluts since I'm not sure of any of these demographics.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 07:08 AM
3

I recall something like that a few weeks ago. Naturally she was directed to RPW since that's basically why they're a community.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 07:03 AM
6

My wife gave her a forearm to the neck against a wall and let her know her place. Seriously? That's pretty awesome.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 06:58 AM
3

Can you send me a link or a name when you think of it?
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 06:54 AM
1

Most resources are available through social means rather than physical means. It's not just the upper class that's able to exploit these resources better than creating physical wealth.
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 06:43 AM
2

Police say the suspect has been described as Chilean or South American, five-foot-eight to five-foot-ten, with a thin to medium build. The man reportedly spoke French and was wearing a navy varsity-style jacket with white leather sleeves and the words “MMXIII The Billionaire Boys Club” written on the back. Police say the man may be from Montreal. Did they just make up a description of maximal douchebaggery? Because I've met that guy and he's a douche.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 02:59 AM
1

Yeah but usually at worst I get ignored for providing data unless I say something outright offensive to the sub. Ah well.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/14 08:52 PM
1

The CDC. They use self-reported data of course but don't give the mean, just the median, so it's not obvious how much people are lying. edit: I just noticed that I was downvoted. Kind of shocking. Maybe I should have put some nonsense just-so hypothesis in there too? Or the source maybe even though it's been posted here several times. Did no one read the interesting bits???
/r/TheRedPill06/09/14 08:14 PM
1

That sounds amazing. Most of the best points of a club without the massive downsides. I'd pay for it too.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:13 AM
2

1/4 of women are feminists so I'm guessing 1/4 is a closer number.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 07:10 AM
2

Having said this, have any of you TRPers been ridiculed or laughed at for holding your frame? I want to say no but I wouldn't remember if I was. People don't think about the people whose attention/opinion/etc they don't care about. As they say, the opposite of both love and hate is apathy, not each other. If someone is ridiculing me without prompting then I know I'm on their mind. What that means for me depends on what I want from that person.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:39 AM
3

Depends, if it were a guy, would you have moved it? I can't imagine a guy asking unless that was the last seat or that seat was good in some way. I can totally imagine a girl asking just for the kick of getting a man's attention. Same with reversed genders or if I (in this scenario) were a celebrity or otherwise standing out as high-status.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:34 AM
2

Well... privilege Sin. intersectionality Argument from authority is more valid the further the "authority" is from a rich white cishet Christian neurotypical male. kyriarchy Patriarchy but with intersectionality integrated. Exists to encourage white female feminists to pretend to have physical and mental disorders so their tumblrite peers won't bully them so much. heteronormativity Even though heterosexuality is literally normal by both definition and common usage, it's wrong to treat it that wa…
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:29 AM
1

I haven't seen feminists use this word in over a year. All the feminist speech I see is geared toward attacking men and the manosphere. Any raising-up of women is phrased as putting-down men.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:21 AM
8

This is literally true, without exaggeration. This has been studied. Women (and men) cannot differentiate between egalitarianism and hostile sexism in men.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:19 AM
2

Except feminists still pretend it has full impact.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:17 AM
3

They say they exclude subpopulations with <2% infection rate.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:15 AM
1

This is true. Not sure why you expected flack unless you think it'll be seen as racist. There's probably no genetic cause. There might be a cultural cause. Economics almost definitely plays a large part but the difference in infection rate sounds larger than the economic disparity.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:12 AM
-1

there were a few women who slept with almost everybody (e.g., sex workers), and most women slept with only a few, This bears out in statistics: less than 10% of women have had 14 or more partners vs about 20% of men.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:11 AM
5

His argument is that fewer men are infected so the higher male->female infection rate due to physiology would end up being no greater than otherwise. It's not a bad argument if we had numbers to judge the respective probabilities but we do not.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 06:09 AM
2

I have a more cynical view. Feminists aren't any less rational than the vast bulk of humanity. Knowing how to actually be right isn't trivial for humans. It requires a lot of effort and knowledge. Feminists fail for the same reasons theists fail. It's ironic that so many atheists are feminists but predictable since the level of rationality needed to reject theism is low.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 06:31 AM
7

People intuitively understand this effect. It's why feminists attack the MRM even when they agree on every particular point: as the MRM gains traction, feminism loses its control over gender discourse and unrelated anti-feminist memes spread more easily. And to think: if feminism weren't corrupt then MRAs would never have bothered forming up apart from feminism and TRP would have a much harder time thriving from being incompatible with feminism.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 06:16 AM
1

One in four said they would marry for money Hahaha this is the precise ratio I witnessed in high school. Funny to see it play out over a large population.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 06:58 AM
3

Ah. Sounds like she's attractive enough to some people but also crazy and open relationshipful and.. well. She carves out the best world for herself but that's probably not the best world for Scott.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 04:59 AM
1

Receiving internet threats isn't indicative of anything. We all get threatened by anonymous dipshits. It's credibly threats that matter. I've never heard of any feminist receiving that sort of threat from MRAs or indeed any male.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:56 AM
1

It's the male sort of shit test: we want our worth as men to be judged by other men. It's part of attaining manhood that we understand ourselves as others see us.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 04:52 AM
1

Do you have specific reasons to think he shouldn't stay with Ozy? I don't know much about her but this: Good: Way more rational than most people. Probably the hottest woman that's shown an interest in Scott. Bad: Some kind of SJW even if she's at least one standard deviation more open-minded than SJWs in general. Genderqueer, or at least claims to be. I don't know enough about her personality to judge her character. She could just be one of those girls that found feminism too young.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 04:21 AM
3

One thing I like about Scott is that he really does try to steelman things that he disagrees with. I had some minor quibbles with his anti-Reaction FAQ, but I could tell he was smart and had done his homework. Note that he didn't write that: his girlfriend did. I too had some quibbles and was surprised it wasn't as rock solid as his usual stuff. She's clearly well above average but ultimately she fell to the shaming-language-means-I'm-right trap of seemingly all SJWs and their ilk. It was... dis…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 04:15 AM
3

This was definitely the biggest factor in my own failures.
/r/TheRedPill03/09/14 04:06 AM
4

At least some of the leaked photos were taken by a boyfriend, meeting the criteria for "sent out willingly".
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:35 PM
0

Singapore. Ancient Rome. America actually integrates a lot of cultures really well. China's history is tumultuous but has integrated its many cultures. Multiculturalism failures are more like much of Europe where the immigrant cultures seek to dominate and the native cultures just let them; and the Middle East where cultures fight to dominate instead of co-exist.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 04:12 AM
1

I don't know. I googled a bit. Probably surveys since we see them occasionally.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 10:34 PM
6

http://imgur.com/a/ICk20 70% male
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:55 PM
5

With a bitcoin address and more promised in the future.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 09:54 PM
2

Ah but that's selfishness on your part. You avoid feeling bad by causing other people to feel less-good. Better women cry and love life than be sad and dry-eyed. Better for women.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 08:17 AM
3

That seems true. For my part, the few spaces I've been where political correctness is absent are the least stressful for me. Ironically, intentionally non-safe spaces are actual safe spaces for me because my worry is being attacked for holding beliefs pattern-matched to "bad", like anything we talk about in this subreddit. I can deal with being offended. That being said, you hear some bigoted shit in anti-PC zones. You can usually tell that the person is stupid or uneducated from their sloppy re…
/r/MensRights01/09/14 08:15 AM
1

Are you defending political correctness or just attacking qemist's smokescreen? I have issue with the former but none with the latter.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:19 AM
0

and websites like this one are what gives the MRM a bad name This seems reasonable but is completely untrue. The MRM has a bad name because feminists lie about what MRAs believe. At no point has the MRM been given a fair chance by feminism therefore feminists pointing at The Spearhead as proof of MRA misogyny etc is rationalization. It could also be true and still be a rationalization. It's not but it could be.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:18 AM
3

I dont give a shit about the Muslims. Its the social workers and police that should hang. I'm sure the Muslim community are even more pissed off that this was allowed to go on and now tars their community. This is actually a terrible answer. It's like killing dogs that bite children while ignoring the animal abuse that ultimately caused it. Those social workers and police were incentivized to let girls be raped because they'd be fired and possible libeled if they did otherwise. From what I read …
/r/MensRights01/09/14 07:02 AM
3

The problem is naive multiculturalism. Here, Pakistani immigrants largely decided to forgo integration or cooperation in favor of simply taking what they want from their host civilization. The initial cause(s) could be anything but it grew into a child sex slavery epidemic because Britons refused to oppose this hostile culture. Multiculturalism can be done extremely well so long as the host civilization welcomes respectful cooperation or integration and fights otherwise. Here, Pakistani rapists …
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:50 AM
3

It's pretty weird how feminists use Marxist notions of class to apply to gender when the material component behind economic class - that wealth is inherited - doesn't apply to gender: men father daughters but rich people don't have poor children.
/r/MensRights01/09/14 06:39 AM
-1

That doesn't distinguish between the usual BB and this particular sort of BB. It's possible that there's no difference but you aren't providing any such evidence.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 04:12 AM
0

I've noticed that nobody notices that women are socially inept. It really didn't strike me until I encountered a young woman that was socially adept. Girl game is at least an order of magnitude rarer than male game. It isn't worth as much as youth or not-being-ugly but a girl with game is at least a point hotter. Heh. Orson Scott Card actually points this out in the Alvin Maker series when the protagonist's wife, years prior, specifically seeks out a tutor in girl game. Fucking Mormons, eh?
/r/MensRights01/09/14 03:44 AM
7

Secondly, this guy claims to be nerdy which is everything the opposite of what she has been fucking in her past. I wonder: if a woman fucks many of a certain sort of man then marries that sort of man, what is the effect on marriage stability? This couldn't be the more desirable sort of man since those such men tend not to marry sluts.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 03:33 AM
2

Thanks for killing my hypothesis! Not really sure what this means but at least now I know it isn't merely status.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 03:25 AM
5

Feminists do, anyway. Women don't seem to care either way.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:11 PM
5

They sure as shit don't shame socially inept women though.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 11:05 PM
7

How much status does a miner gain by being a miner? It's possible that feminists seek to open up high-status jobs and positions to women and high pay appears to cause feminist action only because it correlates with high status. In other words pay -> status -> feminist action and pay -> feminist action look the same if you don't also adjust for status.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 07:10 PM
1

I genuinely would rather be nice to everyone, but it's not what people like, it seems. How much do you know about consequentialism? Because it sounds like you know now that the most good choice sometimes appears bad. Here, acting as an asshole is actually nice and acting nicely is actually suboptimal.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 07:06 PM
1

Sorry, maybe context doesn't come over well in text. That's what I thought you meant, yes. Ah ok. I may use that phrasing for that meaning in the future since I now can see how you must've read it and that makes sense. I mean, the apology sounded sincere, she was in my flat for a good hour before I had to go back to work. But the fact is, if I'd accepted it would have just said whatever she fucks up on, all she needs to do is do a good convincing apology and I'm golden. Yup. She'd need lose some…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 06:54 PM
1

Are you calling her a whore? I thought madam meant ma'am which, used like this, is about as cringey as m'lady. Googling the definition shows that whore is the more common meaning. If so then sorry for my words.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 06:53 PM
2

So, for you a good apology is something sexy? I don't see how that follows from anything I've said. Are you inferring that "private show of apology" means sex? I just mean that the only social capital she might lose is with you and she's already poised to lose all that as you move on to other women. If she had made a public apology then it would actually be costly to her but that's usually a terrible idea for other reasons. A good apology shouldn't be related to sex because then sex is more expl…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 08:09 AM
1

Date meaning LTR eh? None of those points sound relevant to plates.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 07:12 AM
2

In what way is a simple apology good behaviour? The second I relent and say, "Aww it's OK, c'mere..." it's like the slate is clean. All she needs do is apologize and I'll be all good again. I hold that apologies are worth no redemption alone. If she really wanted to keep you then it would have to actually cost her something. A private show of apology is extremely cheap, especially for a woman.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 07:09 AM
1

madam What earthly motive moves you to call a young woman "madam"?
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 07:04 AM
13

Men's rights groups and other slimy guys will use this sort of terminology in order to "elevate" themselves above women and other men, but it's really just a front for acting douchey and "getting back" at all those "evil feminists" and the "betas" that get the girls the "alphas" want. I'd like to point out that MRAs generally don't use the terms alpha and beta. This is yet another example of feminist rhetoric's complete divorce from reality.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 06:53 AM
6

I've already spent too much time writing up the reasons why they hate or dislike us. I was going to go into the reasons why each of those points is wrong or contradictory, but I don't have the energy for it right now. Maybe later! Not explaining actually seems stronger to me.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 02:30 AM
3

That would require them to admit to themselves that they can't snag a high-value husband all for themselves. By the time they muster the courage, they're too old to even share a high-value husband.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 02:26 AM
4

I'm guessing she uses a lot of makeup or used to since her skin looks poorly too.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 02:24 AM
6

Yep. You just need to also be cool.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 02:22 AM
1

If traditional academia becomes a male desert then men will form other institutions.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 02:17 AM
1

What evidence do you have that severity of punishment reduces criminal activity? What I've read is that there's no or little correlation.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 02:16 AM
7

the bill Reading the bill, a few points stand out to me as wrong or worrisome: (2) A policy that, in the evaluation of complaints in any disciplinary process, it shall not be a valid excuse to alleged lack of affirmative consent that the accused believed that the complainant consented to the sexual activity under either of the following circumstances: (A) The accused’s belief in affirmative consent arose from the intoxication or recklessness of the accused. (emphasis mine) Imagine a man, drunk t…
/r/MensRights29/08/14 08:42 AM
2

Men's Rights is NOT a right-wing sub I'm a leftist... It's supposed to be apolitical. There's no way you know what that means. Men's rights is by nature political. It's just not championed by leftists or right-wing parties. Or in leftist speak, the MRM is silent on the issue of capital and worker's rights.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 07:54 AM
1

Note that Robert California is a fictional character from The Office, an American television series.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:42 AM
-11

The leftist subs are like that too even though women make up a small minority of members. The influence of feminism really does seem to be the cause.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 03:38 AM
2

They will never thank you. Empirically shown (to me) to be false. While anecdote isn't usually acceptable as evidence, you are claiming that 100% of women will never thank any man for helping them. Yes, you are claiming that. I know you mean it as rhetoric but you then rebuffed my rhetoric with a demand for a non-rhetorical answer. They will never appreciate it. I'm sure you have a study to show this to be true since there's no way to know this without some manner of deep observation. Again, you…
/r/MensRights27/08/14 07:20 AM
7

Girls like casual sex just as much as guys No, they don't. This has been studied. Women only like casual sex when they believe it will be enjoyable, which is uncommonly. Men almost always like casual sex - possibly because we expect with high probability that it will be enjoyable. Also, partner count is a status indicator for men but not women. If you don't see this as me arguing with you then I apologize - I see an unqualified statement out of context and don't assume you implied the correct qu…
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 06:50 AM
1

That isn't untrue but the real reason is most likely simply that other women refer to their past sluttery as "harmless". I can't think of a case where men refer to their past choices as harmless so as not to be considered indicative of their character so this is also a case of solipsism: these women project their feelings of their choices onto their men, to their own pain.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 06:21 AM
2

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say you're a recovering white knight. The true opposite of bad behavior is usually bad behavior.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 03:55 AM
3

Playing DivorceQuest IRL is its hardcore mode. Most hardcore game in world.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 03:01 AM
19

83% of doctors are too afraid of being sued and 25% of women are at least one manner of evil.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 02:59 AM
9

Without intending any kind of patronizing speech here: original thought is uncommon because it's hard and rarely necessary. People get their beliefs from others and they serve pretty well because memes undergo selective pressures that include their hosts surviving well enough to pass on their memes - or at least enough hosts. The people of SRD can support women's rights with reasons X and oppose men's rights with reasons ~X without a hint of irony because they at no point attempted to reconcile …
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:39 AM
0

You appealed to authority a lot. That's good - it means you have no argument. Well, good for my self-image. If you had a counter-argument of merit then I might improve my understanding. The name-calling at least is called for since I started that.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 07:10 AM
3

But really, it has nothing to do with men's rights Rape culture hysteria is harming men and boys and here we have a clear case of feminists promoting this hysteria. Fighting feminism is promoting men's rights wherever feminism harms men.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:09 AM
2

Brave New World. I know it's a basically unheard-of work but maybe someone should send her a copy anyway.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 05:01 AM
2

It's the same concept for democratic and socialist society's. It sounds good until you DO IT. For example: Obama Care. It's just fucking stupid. Sure, we can have that fight here and now. That ringing is the sound you having been knocked the fuck out. Obama Care is only stupid because the immensely greedy and retarded (mostly disparate sets) opposed a single-payer system. Which, if you know your economics, is much cheaper than the current system and the past system. As evidenced by them being st…
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:58 AM
1

She's trolling for plausible deniability but she'll settle for "I'm not usually like that! I'm so sorry it won't happen again." If she's smart she'll also gaslight since even betas are rarely that naive.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:33 AM
1

Have you done it like that before? This is basically how I imagine I'd do it but I lack experience to judge.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:31 AM
2

This feels like a weak play. If it's all you have then sure, do it, but when you're defending, operating on the same level as the aggressor is usually a losing play. They wouldn't attack unless they think they can take you (read: she believes her SMV is higher aka has OP pegged as a beta) and if it doesn't look that way and your opponent isn't retarded, you're probably missing crucial information. Since this is a war over her beliefs, even actually being hotter than her won't help OP until she's…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:28 AM
3

You know what did work, though? Selling drugs in college. NO, I'm not joking, people are fucking textbook, and it's kind of sad. I exist because my dad was a drug dealer.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:05 AM
1

Ah I'll check that out then. Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:01 AM
3

Kind of like when someone yells at you, the most pussy thing to do is ignore them. Gotta yell back! Because countersignalling isn't a thing. Hell it's not even a word.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 04:01 AM
3

I wonder: is there research into optimal human relationships that isn't done because it would face feminist opposition? We already know there's a strong feminist bias in how studies are presented (for a fact).
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 02:20 AM
2

even among Souix Indians This sounds extremely interesting. Where did you read it?
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 02:19 AM
1

I doubt additional pressure has a measurable impact. Admittedly this is from how I respond to it since I don't know of any studies measuring how public proclamations of intent affect adherence beyond simply proclaimed/not proclaimed.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 02:14 AM
0

Completely true but not necessarily incompatible with leftajar's statement. This study validates women slut-shaming to keep their friends (and therefore themselves) from sleeping around. If they want to marry anyway.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 02:10 AM
11

This time with empirical evidence.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 02:08 AM
3

A lot of people, even in heavily feminist areas, are tolerant of the MRM when they know about it. Those people are just not very loud. I know this from experience. Areas with less feminist influence must be much more open-minded but again, no one says anything because they're ambivalent.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:39 AM
2

You shouldn't have apologized. I know it feels like the right thing to do but that's flawed programming.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:37 AM
1

Oh baby you know I'm creepin'. Jeepers and such.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/14 06:25 AM
1

A model hitting the wall. You know, we're making an unfounded assumption here. She says the guy is "perfect" but she's also suing a company on the basis that her life, including romance, was harmed by its actions. The guy could easily just be one of her bi-weekly ego boosts.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 09:46 PM
1

No, they have a different average. Average meaning median in these studies because mean is, as you say, identical. However it would tell us the width of the dishonesty gap.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 06:05 AM
1

Install f.lux on your computer. At nightfall it filters out blue light. Blue light being what keeps people attentive well past when they'd fall asleep naturally. You can install similar apps on your phone and tablet. Also make sure to give yourself some weeks to get used to the tiny change. Take melatonin before you want to go to sleep. Should you awaken in the dead of night, take some more. Work out late in the day so you are tired. Meditation quiets thought. If your mind is racing as you lay a…
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:54 AM
1

Does that account for multigenerational effects? Those are definitely much greater than a single inch, though they might just be a single inch per generation.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:23 AM
3

If they want to be in the celebrity crowd then yes. If they want money enough then yes. This is true of many men but experience shows it's overwhelmingly true of women.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:16 AM
3

From the wording it sounds like she didn't get this restriction of hers in writing. If it was worth 10 million dollars to her, was in viacom's interests to violate, and likely to happen even by accident, then she really should have gotten it in writing.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:11 AM
1

I assumed she was Jewish but I can't find anything. She probably is paternally Polish though: sauce.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:08 AM
9

LESS THAN TWO PERCENT even though the statistics put 2% as the bare bottom incidence and 8% as a sensible floor.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 05:01 AM
8

Do you have a source to back that up? I'd expect latinos to be more common perpetrators simply due to being mostly lower class and a larger percentage of the population.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 04:59 AM
1

That's true, it is unlikely. I'd hazard that OP's skill in finding a high-quality LTR woman factors in too. It's possible he has rejected all women that didn't have this imbalance by filtering on some proxy much as is proselytized here.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 04:50 AM
1

Its possible that a husband's partner count correlates with the wife being unhappy but the husband being unaffected. That being said, it wouldn't make sense to hold out for that evidence before switching stance unless ones prior is pretty far skewed.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 03:09 AM
2

Seriously? That's immensely important. Did they completely ignore the methodology section or something?
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 03:06 AM
2

Or she was dating below hers. The best deals are those that correct the market.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 11:58 PM
7

less partners haha Anyway: You can't use numbers from disparate sources like that. RP theory predicts that the distribution of sex partners is flattish for women and incredibly skewed toward the top 20% for men. Without information as to how many partners the "14+" men actually had, the study you cite isn't evidence either way. I wonder why you used that specific age range. This could be benign but it seems odd to use a specific age range without explanation when the total average is available.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 05:28 PM
0

It really wasn't that long.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 06:35 AM
1

Improving the world only lessens their power. It's the same reason why there's a war on drugs, terror, puppy sadness, etc.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 06:34 AM
2

So Bulgarian men are as American women?
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 11:38 PM
2

I don't like some of these posters but I strongly disagree with your opinion. MRAs can not discuss gender problems feminists don't care to discuss. MRAs did so for decades with no effect until they started doing so in their own spaces. When men speak candidly about feeling like they have nowhere to vent their problems, what feminists actually did is belittle them. The entire "male tears" meme is what feminism is to men that dare to be honest about how they feel. Usually people come in here sayin…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:58 AM
3

I strongly disagree. The MRM's image is not serviced by pandering to feminists in any way what-so-ever. Public perception of feminism is vaguely positive but mostly people just fear feminist and other SJW backlash. When the cultural backlash against feminism hits, the MRM will be poised to lead the next wave of approach toward egalitarianism. More, any inch given to SJWs of any breed or calibre only serves to encourage that they take a mile. If we signal them that they have the power to guide ou…
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:47 AM
2

The third image is terrible and should be removed. There's no explicit link to feminism provided and I doubt the implicit link is significant. The demonization of male sexuality isn't proven to be due to feminism with sufficient strength to justify a probabilistic AND with such strong language.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:33 AM
1

That's uncharitable to Zoe's ex. He's told others that she is not to be trusted as a partner because she betrays that trust. Repeatedly and without remorse. Had he smashed up her car then he'd only be venting his rage, not doing anyone a service. Net-positive vs net-negative utility.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 06:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter