~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Putting An End To The Black Pill.Wouldn't that be nice; if looks didn't matter | /r/TheRedPill | 28/09/17 02:31 PM |
| 1 | Putting An End To The Black Pill.Don't avoid the question; what would the effect on your friend's success be if he were much less attractive? | /r/TheRedPill | 28/09/17 09:54 AM |
| 1 | Putting An End To The Black Pill.Would he be able to do the same if his looks were a 1 instead, all else being equal? | /r/TheRedPill | 27/09/17 09:28 PM |
| 1 | Putting An End To The Black Pill.Seriously, do you hear yourself? A guy who is a 5, maybe even a 6 is your proof that EVERY man can perform like that What do you think it MEANS to be a 5 or 6, man? That guy's average or higher; what is his story supposed to prove about the potential of the 1 out of every 10 men who is a 1? Or the 1 out of 100 men who's a 0.1? 1 out of 100 doctors might have an IQ of 100, but that doesn't in the slightest prove that someone with an IQ of 80 can make it; the numbers work out very much the same fo… | /r/TheRedPill | 27/09/17 08:18 PM |
| 2 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.You can be a genuinely good person, but you still have to be willing to do things that will get you called an asshole, like deny favors, speak honestly, etc. Simply not giving women everything they ask for will often get you called an asshole | /r/TheRedPill | 26/09/17 11:39 AM |
| 1 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.What are you even reading? You can't inflict the avoidance of validation seeking behavior onto others; you can inflict suffering. Don't. Thou tulip-ported wallenparker | /r/TheRedPill | 25/09/17 01:48 AM |
| 1 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.If someone doesn't like inflicting actual suffering on others, what could possibly be the problem with that? There's a genetically selected tendency towards altruism that you can overcome and repress if you want, but to what end? Why do things that you find repugnant? | /r/TheRedPill | 24/09/17 10:09 PM |
| 0 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.What part of "you have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole" sounds like "being worried about being perceived as an asshole?" | /r/TheRedPill | 24/09/17 04:02 PM |
| 1 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.Well, what kind of person would feel attacked by this message? ;) | /r/TheRedPill | 24/09/17 01:54 AM |
| 2 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.Voldemort being cool: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1A6bkXY75do | /r/TheRedPill | 22/09/17 11:30 PM |
| 1 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.The solution is left as an exercise for the reader | /r/TheRedPill | 22/09/17 09:03 PM |
| 1 | You don't have to be an asshole, you just have to act in a way that gets you called an asshole.Real men root for Voldemort, duh | /r/TheRedPill | 22/09/17 08:48 PM |
| 1 | Continuation on the THREE kinds of men (Pirates of the Caribbean)Too kind It's fiction, my friend. Han's cool in real life; but Jack is cooler. It doesn't matter what the story says | /r/TheRedPill | 02/09/17 01:42 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodYes, well, you won't know if you prefer living in North Korea until you get there, either. Most people learn to work around that particular little quirk of life, though, without having to move there to figure it out | /r/TheRedPill | 28/08/17 08:26 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodIf the end journey of improving your SMV is to become a 2, your efforts are probably better spent improving something else. | /r/TheRedPill | 28/08/17 10:45 AM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodThere's nothing deep about it; it's just a straightforward obvious fact. You can increase your standing to some degree. Let's say you can triple it (on some made-up scale). Well, you'd better start at at least a third of the way to attractiveness, then, because if you have even less than that, you'll triple your SMV, hit your limits, and still not be attractive. If you have high IQ but low everything else, then, yes, maybe you can try the money route. But it's certainly my impression that more m… | /r/TheRedPill | 27/08/17 12:46 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodHow much IQ is necessary to understand game theory, what personality necessary to pull it off, and what basic SMV necessary to even be in the running? | /r/TheRedPill | 25/08/17 12:52 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodYou're silly. Just google conscientiousness | /r/TheRedPill | 25/08/17 12:16 PM |
| 2 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodWhy isn't there? Is it inevitable that someone will have some redeeming quality; it's impossible to just be below average in everything? | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 08:54 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodIt takes all that plus lucky genes | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 08:50 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodPredictor may not mean what you think it does. If you had to rank people from highest to lowest in things like longevity, income, and a few other things, and had to pick one piece of information to do it with, their IQ would do better than any other one thing you could pick | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 07:57 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodI could buy moving from a the-worst-out-of-10 guys (10th percentile) up to the 2nd best out of 10 guys. I get a little doubtful if you start out as the worst out of 1000 guys and think you can make it up into the best 25 of them. As your starting point becomes lower and lower, and your aim higher and higher, I doubt more and more you can really do it. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 07:51 PM |
| 2 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodA few quotes from around Wikipedia. I'm not really great at research or anything, but this issue seems sufficiently clear that it doesn't take much to find out what is necessary: "Although the term first appeared in a 1964 paper by Michael Beldoch, it gained popularity in the 1995 book by that title, written by the author, psychologist, and science journalist Daniel Goleman. Since this time, Goleman's 1995 analysis of EI has been criticized within the scientific community,[2] despite prolific re… | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodThe best fighters have consistently low IQ's. You don't have to get lucky in IQ to fight, you have to get lucky in other things | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 02:22 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodIs it written like a correct autist or an incorrect autist? | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 02:19 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodHave you checked for both sides of the issue? I've heard both sides, and it's my understanding that IQ is much more predictive, and that EQ is basically useless. You'll find the same if you look it up, I'm sure | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 02:18 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodStudy and work will let you reach your limits, not invent new ones. So, you can improve some, but it'll cap out eventually. | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 01:21 PM |
| 2 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodWhat you're describing is called "grit" in the literature, and is about 37% heritable: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26867111 It also cannot remotely overcome your other shortcomings. You can't grit your way into a physics PhD or the Olympics or even into reading if you don't have the IQ | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 12:26 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodDo you have any sources? The Wikipedia page on IQ suggests, as does every abstract I've seen on the subject, that IQ is the single strongest predictor of life success (SES coming in second). And it's also my understanding that EQ is swallowed up in IQ, making it pretty much useless as a measure | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 11:12 AM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodIs that what you did to become a rich Nobel Prize-winning Olympian ladies' man? | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 09:45 AM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodYou need some for that, less for other things, more for other things. An average IQ is fine and can be buffed up by compensating with work or other talents, sure. If you have a below average IQ, say, maybe you're in the bottom 5% of the population, you'll struggle to do much of anything at all, though... :/ | /r/TheRedPill | 24/08/17 12:16 AM |
| 3 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodMost people who learn non-mainstream truths do so only in one area. They're not unusually right about things outside of that area. Like how scientists are no better at getting right answers than anybody else once they're outside the lab, or how atheists are almost as irrational as theists. To systematically find hidden truths in whatever area of life you choose requires that you take a step back and study truth-seeking. It's not enough to have discovered truth one time in one area. Some RP peopl… | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 09:43 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodIt's really like the "women only see the men at the top of the hierarchy" thing, but for men, too. Maybe men aren't quite so narrow in their scope, but they still leave out the people at the bottom. "If you're retarded, you can always compete in the special olympics." If you think being retarded is as low as you can go, maybe that shows how low you look before you start ignoring people's existence. What about the average retarded person, who is not a special olympic-level athlete? | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 07:47 PM |
| 4 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodIt takes work + steroids + genes. Without the genes, if all you've got is work + steroids, then you can get somewhere, but you can't get up to Arnold's level. The same applies to anything, physical performance, mental performance, social performance, etc. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 07:41 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodYou judging the unlucky for not reaching your level is like Nobel Prize winners judging you for not reaching theirs | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 06:21 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodIf you're mentally retarded and in the top 1% for the physicality of retarded people...Can every retarded person compete in the special olympics? Some things don't have just get a longer learning curve. Without a certain minimum IQ, you simply can't learn calculus at all, ever. Or learn to read (different minimum IQ). Hard work is necessary, but it's not sufficient. All the Nobel Prize winners work hard. But that's not enough by itself. You have to have the work and the intelligence. One without… | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 06:15 PM |
| 4 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodYou're talking about how all the above average people fight it out for the absolute top spot. Even the "losers" of that contest do well above average in life, even if they don't make the history books. The real people who lose out are the ones who were never in that top tier contest, or even in the mid tier contest. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 06:11 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodCapacity for discipline and hard work are also heritable. And he had his quirks, like intensely enjoying the feeling of working out, and a good structural body shape, IQ, etc. The people at the very top work very hard, are genetically lucky, AND have to get lucky in life. There are plenty of people like them who don't make it just because of luck in life Of course, those people will still do pretty well for themselves, since they got genetically lucky and word hard, too. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 06:09 PM |
| 7 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodHooo boy, yes... Some people get the bad hand in genetics and then the bad hand in life, too. They've got it even worse off... For the majority who don't have it quite so bad, they really can achieve above average results with some hard work; I think that probably applies no matter what we're measuring. If it's not about riches or looks, maybe it's about happiness or something...which is about 50% heritable. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodFor most people. There's a vast spectrum from disability to ability. And there are those just barely on this side of disability, some of whom can't even make it to average level ability in things. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 04:20 PM |
| 2 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodYes, you can. Lucky you can. Not everyone is as lucky as you. Not everyone is even lucky enough to be in the 10th percentile. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 03:30 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodYes, the natural genetic handicap usually balances out. But not always. It works out great for the moderately below average and higher. For people at the bottom...it's great for them to learn to do what they can. But we shouldn't sit up here and yell at them when it turns out they never really get anywhere. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 03:27 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodI'd like people to do as well as they and be happy. It's their choice, and I hope they make the right one. | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 03:23 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodAnd if it seems like they can't do it... They should just keep trying, and it's their fault if they never succeed? | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 02:58 PM |
| 1 | Do the best you can with the genetic hand life deals you? Sometimes that's still not very goodThis idea makes people uncomfortable, but they really already know it's true Like you said, you already know not everybody can reach the performance level of Arnold. I'm sure you'd also agree most people can never make original discoveries in physics. It sounds like you think we disagree, but if you believe these things, what's the disagreement? | /r/TheRedPill | 23/08/17 02:36 PM |
| 2 | No reason to pursue inclusive genetic fitness/maximize genetic impact/ have lots of kids/ "fulfill your species' purpose"What objective rational reason would there be for a global minority to reproduce? | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/17 01:05 PM |
| 1 | If we're going to talk about how important parents/fathers are, we need to have a basic understanding of what's going onIt's theoretically possible that Red Pill parents DO have long-term outcome effects on their children. No such effect appears in the research, but maybe there are so few RP parents that the effect they're having is being lost amid the statistical noise. Of course, most Blue Pill parents think they're making this big difference in their children's outcomes, at least, they do in the cultures where they're taught to think that way. Apparently, it just SEEMING like you're having this great impact do… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/17 11:45 AM |
| 1 | If we're going to talk about how important parents/fathers are, we need to have a basic understanding of what's going onThe studies I've been talking about (see documentary and book) suggest that parents don't really instill values. People mold their behavior to their environment. If being a jerk at home gets them what they want, then they'll be a jerk. If being a jerk at school makes the other kids dislike them, then they'll stop being a jerk. As an adult, this person will continue to change their behavior according to the norms of their environment. And whatever deviations they have from the immediate environme… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/17 11:41 AM |
| 1 | No reason to pursue inclusive genetic fitness/maximize genetic impact/ have lots of kids/ "fulfill your species' purpose"Dead on. We like being strong, we like sex and orgasms (even if we use condoms and it doesn't help our inclusive genetic fitness), we like being respected, etc. All things worth pursuing, then But our enjoyment is not why evolution made us like those things. And that's just fine. Who cares what evolution "wants?" We can just enjoy ourselves anyway, and ignore what evolution wants | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/17 11:35 AM |
| 0 | If we're going to talk about how important parents/fathers are, we need to have a basic understanding of what's going onIt's possible that the studies show no difference because most fathers don't do much for their children just by being around, sometimes playing with them, taking an interest, etc. Whatever the average father does. I also think it's possible that an exceptional father can have an actual impact, especially if they actually provide knowledge or skills to their children. Those things last even outside the home environment, and the studies seem to suggest that most parental effects only last as far a… | /r/TheRedPill | 22/07/17 03:21 AM |
| -1 | If we're going to talk about how important parents/fathers are, we need to have a basic understanding of what's going onThe research finds no long-term outcome changes for children whose father or parents are missing. This includes things like grades, college, degrees, income, happiness, drug use, criminal tendencies, etc. Are you thinking there are other outcomes that are affected? What is parental presence important for if not for any of these things? | /r/TheRedPill | 21/07/17 11:51 PM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?That doesn't mean they aren't attracted to those qualities | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/07/17 11:29 AM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?I feel like it's not quite the same. I can't say for sure, but women don't seem to talk about men the way men talk about women (See "When A Man Loves A Woman." Their love songs about each other are very distinct, such that you could probably identify them even if you removed gender-specific nouns When a loves a , can do no wrong. Turn back on best friend, if put __ down Could that go either way? Well...yeah...If we showed it to people and asked them to guess, would they go for man singing about … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/07/17 11:08 AM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?Interesting, like most of what makes a man attractive is in the face? I know that's not most of what makes a woman attractive, what makes you think it works this way? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/07/17 10:47 AM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?It sounds like we're saying that 80% of men are indeed below average attractiveness to women. I get the breakdown of why that is, which is useful and insightful. At the end of the day, perhaps for good reason, I suppose, women don't find the average man attractive, or even an above average man way up around the 80th percentile. It's my understanding that men do not do the same thing. Women are also getting fatter in America, but men rate the average woman as average, if I understand the study. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/07/17 10:38 AM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?Like the dread and so on stuff would work equally well on men as women, and probably even most mammal species And the rest is all wrong, all the ideas about gender differences and status dynamics, etc? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 05/07/17 01:59 AM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?Marvelous stuff, thank you Is that ideal "Cosmopolitan" level of musculature...do you know what it is? I imagine it's still well above average, but I don't know. I'll look at the magazine if I have to, I guess. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 09:50 PM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?I don't know. I'd love to find out more about it, cross-culturally or across different times. Do you know anything about that? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 09:49 PM |
| 2 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?I actually asked for evidence for that idea twice; didn't get a single response to that question, either I just found a PPD post which found that men and women both cheat or divorce more on the basis of having had past sexual partners What I am curious about is what the female love experience is like, and how they feel towards friends. I realized that there's no reason that they should completely match the male experience of those two things | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 09:48 PM |
| 3 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?Like controlling one's own emotions? I do know that women come out about half a point higher on neuroticism relative to men on the Big 5 personality test. I could imagine that a man being too neurotic would seem girly since it's sort of a womanly trait | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 09:46 PM |
| 2 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?http://www.hpmor.com/chapter/39 | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 09:14 PM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?E stands for Every? That sounds very different indeed. Enough that I'm curious; is it something you would mind talking about? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 09:05 PM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?Mmm, that's a good point. I suspect we agree that a man can move up a few points, but there's a limit somewhere. TRP doesn't help much if you're really low down there... | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 07:57 PM |
| 1 | I've asked this twice on TRP and not received a single response: Which parts of TRP are you less sure are true, or do you think are flat out wrong?I don't understand... If it's just a joke, no worries ;) | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 07:52 PM |
| 1 | Q4RP: What is asshole behavior and how does one treat women badly?It's my impression that a "good man" is one who treats women special. A man who refuses to do anything extra for a woman will be seen as less good, ie, an asshole To me, the point is more that you have to act in the way that's going to get you called an asshole, ie, you have to be fair rather than biased towards women. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 04/07/17 07:48 PM |
| 2 | Is there any evidence that having lots of sex partners interferes with a woman's ability to pair-bond? And what is a pair-bond, exactly? Isn't she only supposed to feel things for you if you're being high-status?I know that, I was wondering if we knew that that was because of the effect on pair-bonding, or if that was just speculation | /r/askTRP | 24/06/17 03:07 AM |
| 2 | Is there any evidence that having lots of sex partners interferes with a woman's ability to pair-bond? And what is a pair-bond, exactly? Isn't she only supposed to feel things for you if you're being high-status?So...here, pair bonding refers to her ability to recognize that she's in a fairly equitable arrangement. Having lots of sexual partners makes a woman think her commitment-level value is higher than it is, hence it makes it hard for her to be happy in a committed relationship with someone at her level. | /r/askTRP | 23/06/17 11:25 PM |
| 1 | Is there any evidence that having lots of sex partners interferes with a woman's ability to pair-bond? And what is a pair-bond, exactly? Isn't she only supposed to feel things for you if you're being high-status?Yeah, I could imagine it being hard to transition...it doesn't seem like it would have all that strong of an effect, though I mean, hey, men have to transition, too | /r/askTRP | 23/06/17 06:06 PM |
| 1 | Is there any evidence that having lots of sex partners interferes with a woman's ability to pair-bond? And what is a pair-bond, exactly? Isn't she only supposed to feel things for you if you're being high-status?I'm familiar with that from a few places. Is there anything else, or anything that helps narrow down the possible causes of the correlation? | /r/askTRP | 23/06/17 05:44 PM |
| 1 | Is there any evidence that having lots of sex partners interferes with a woman's ability to pair-bond? And what is a pair-bond, exactly? Isn't she only supposed to feel things for you if you're being high-status?I can see how it would affect how easily you can be satisfied. Is that all this "pairbonding" idea is? How easily you'er satisfied? Or, in what way does it damage the process of finding a long term partner? | /r/askTRP | 23/06/17 05:43 PM |
| 1 | Is there any evidence that having lots of sex partners interferes with a woman's ability to pair-bond? And what is a pair-bond, exactly? Isn't she only supposed to feel things for you if you're being high-status?Wouldn't she know she could do better if she dated or attracted men without ever actually having sex with them? I mean, and that's assuming she can't just tell even without dating. Wouldn't she have a pretty good idea of whom she could have sex with just walking around ordinary life? | /r/askTRP | 23/06/17 05:42 PM |
| 1 | My girlfriend continues to present TRP stuff. This is intense...She described women's break-up, get-over-a-man strategy and basically said all women are manipulative, and men are stupid for thinking they'll find a non-manipulative, perfect woman who "loves them for who they are."That's what's doing it for me...my girlfriend and I have an unusual dynamic going on between us, and she's been both presenting ideas all on her own that match TRP, and confirming almost everything I ask about. That a woman's saying it has had a powerful effect on me | /r/TheRedPill | 21/06/17 04:24 PM |
| 2 | How To Pick Up Women Using Psychology (Part 2 Liking and Social Proof)I'm of two minds in this area. I want to point out that "liking" is not the same thing as "arousing" and that pick up is more about arousing At the same time, I know that the WAY you say things communicates the most about your frame. Maybe you really could say something nice about a girl's personality and have it come across not as trying to make her like you, if you said it in the right way. If so, then maybe this really could help. I don't know. I guess that's what it depends on. Does saying n… | /r/TheRedPill | 11/06/17 03:30 PM |
| 1 | "Ursula...senses what’s lacking in his emotional life, and...become[s] whatever that man most needs. She probably convinces herself each time that she’s truly in love, but I doubt she’s capable of what most of us would call real loving...lacks a solid identity...It's all unconscious, by the way"Big fan of SSC and LW and that whole section of thought. A lot of it is what let me give the uncomfortable and offensive ideas of TRP a real chance and see that (still working on this) some significant section of it is true and insightful. Can I PM you about these ideas you think are probably wrong? | /r/TheRedPill | 09/06/17 12:23 PM |
| 2 | "Ursula...senses what’s lacking in his emotional life, and...become[s] whatever that man most needs. She probably convinces herself each time that she’s truly in love, but I doubt she’s capable of what most of us would call real loving...lacks a solid identity...It's all unconscious, by the way"Thanks, man. The book seems great so far, describes very well the kind of woman I had in mind I've been over Rollo's stuff. I'm just still getting everything sorted. I'm not sure what all is supposed to be true of all women, what's not, which TRP ideas are most solid, which are controversial, or wrong even if most TRP people believe them, etc. Still working on it all. | /r/TheRedPill | 09/06/17 12:21 PM |
| 1 | "Ursula...senses what’s lacking in his emotional life, and...become[s] whatever that man most needs. She probably convinces herself each time that she’s truly in love, but I doubt she’s capable of what most of us would call real loving...lacks a solid identity...It's all unconscious, by the way"The girl in my own life talked about just that, too. Always taking care of other people, never herself. It was something she said she was working on, learning what she wanted and to pursue it | /r/TheRedPill | 09/06/17 11:17 AM |
| 1 | My Girlfriend Is Explaining and Confirming TRP Concepts...I think the arousing vs like dichotomy might be helpful here. How you were raised will have minimal effect on what arouses you, as it would have little effect on anyone, man or woman. Emotions are largely instinctual and difficult to change, if possible at all. You might like all sorts of people, of course, but that's not the point | /r/TheRedPill | 06/06/17 10:26 PM |
| 1 | My Girlfriend Is Explaining and Confirming TRP Concepts...Our relationship is a tad unusual. As I said, I think she might be trying to plead her own exceptionalism, but it seems likely that the actual ideas she's explaining are true. If they were lies, it would be amazing that they happened to match TRP concepts. There is one truth, and many ways to lie. You can have independent verification of ideas if there is communication between the two sources, like if she read TRP stuff and decided to pretend it was true, but I don't think that's what happened, … | /r/TheRedPill | 05/06/17 07:18 PM |
| 28 | My Girlfriend Is Explaining and Confirming TRP Concepts..."Want" for relationship or resources, not for sex. At least, it's not sexy. A man could be sexy for other reasons, of course | /r/TheRedPill | 04/06/17 03:16 AM |
| 1 | Are there any non-redpill places that discuss redpill principles? I'm thinking evolutionary psychology should know most of it...other places?Wouldn't the evolutionary psychology bits be the ones to take most seriously, then, since they have independent verification? | /r/askTRP | 01/06/17 02:04 PM |
| 1 | Want to know women's true values? Look at which women they admire and aspire to be like; whom do they imitate? Princess Diana, Audrey Hepburn (any ugly women?)Excellent point. Seems to follow the trend of considered attractive, rich, non-productive outside of entertainment... The main difference between the new and old ones is that these women are publicly promiscuous. Is that because women have changed to value that, or because women didn't used to be able to get away with it...? | /r/askTRP | 31/05/17 11:31 PM |
| 1 | Is sex with a condom really that safe? How likely is pregnancy or disease?The rates I've seen suggest you could easily impregnate a girl every 100 times you have sex. Does that match your assessment? That might be a bit much for me... | /r/askTRP | 31/05/17 08:02 PM |
| 1 | Is sex with a condom really that safe? How likely is pregnancy or disease?Is that your way of saying that these things DO happen, but it's the best strategy we've got (unless we're going to forego frequent sex)? | /r/askTRP | 31/05/17 07:49 PM |
| 1 | How does theRedPill apply to high school?I don't know much there. Just be careful not to have it ruin you. Maybe think about how a girl would freak out over some little thing that didn't look good up there, understand why they feel that way(they understand how the status game works), and don't have anything up that a cool higher-status person wouldn't | /r/askTRP | 29/05/17 11:01 AM |
| 1 | Who are great, charismatic personalities to watch socially dominate and charm? I'm thinking Russell Brand, Robert Downey Jr...Good one, thank you | /r/askTRP | 29/05/17 10:59 AM |
| 1 | How does theRedPill apply to high school?So, status comes from your personality, your social circle, your appearance and manner, and your pre-selection (which mates have signaled your value by being with you). To go up, go piece by piece. Go for a girl just a little out of your league, a girl with higher status than you. Before you try to date her, up your status in the other areas so that she might consider you. Once you're with a girl, that sets a minimum for your own status, and you can push the window a little more with a higher st… | /r/askTRP | 29/05/17 12:13 AM |
| 1 | How does theRedPill apply to high school?It's just fighting to look good, with a million details. Trying to look good by going out with a high-status mate, or hanging with a high-status member, by getting the crowd's attention, by overcoming "heckling" or shit tests, by expressing dominance over people and not losing when they try to re-assert themselves, etc. If I understand it, women are constantly aware of their status, terrified to lose it, and always looking to up it. Some men are socially apt enough to get into it, too, and they … | /r/askTRP | 29/05/17 12:02 AM |
| 3 | How does theRedPill apply to high school?It's easier to start with people who haven't already put you in a box. But not impossible. You do have 5 days a week for years, after all. Up your status, and work your way up. There's a whole political game going on that you can get into if you like. Do you know everything that goes into determining your status in that environment? | /r/askTRP | 28/05/17 09:39 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter