TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iBelieveButton Archive

View 3 posts and 375 comments by iBelieveButton on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Modafinil Doesn't this require a prescription?
/r/TheRedPill06/12/16 11:34 PM
24

Oh you mean the site that links DIRECTLY to the DOJ paper itself. I guess I'm still laughing, only this time it's at you.
/r/MensRights05/12/16 10:10 PM
19

It's WAY less than 1/20, it's closer to .6% http://thefederalist.com/2014/12/11/new-doj-data-on-sexual-assaults-college-students-are-actually-less-likely-to-be-victimized/
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:32 PM
21

http://thefederalist.com/2014/12/11/new-doj-data-on-sexual-assaults-college-students-are-actually-less-likely-to-be-victimized/
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:32 PM
39

An American woman has a 25 to 26 percent chance of being raped in her lifetime. Yeah no, this is so LAUGHABLY wrong. http://thefederalist.com/2014/12/11/new-doj-data-on-sexual-assaults-college-students-are-actually-less-likely-to-be-victimized/
/r/MensRights05/12/16 08:31 PM
38

"They want to be painted as these poor victims of censorship Oh the motherfucking irony hurts.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 06:17 PM
3

He says that, but then continues to blame men. One sentence to the contrary doesn't change the tone of the entire article.
/r/MensRights17/11/16 12:06 AM
25

Except the author is still blaming men. Adding a disclaimer to the contrary doesn't suddenly make it so.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 12:48 PM
43

A statistic I'm not really surprised to read about. What also didn't surprise me is how the author pretty much blames all the failed marriages on men. You got that right. Nothing is ever a woman's fault. Ever.
/r/MensRights16/11/16 10:21 AM
2

Top universities develop programs meant "to purge toxic gayness". "Many college students...believe that gayness is the root cause of sexual violence, body shaming, and terrorism". "The programs...set up safe spaces for gay students to contemplate the toxicity of their gayness". This is a fun game.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:53 AM
52

"toxic masculinity" is anything about a man that a women deems "unacceptable" It's the feminization of men, pure and simple.
/r/MensRights15/11/16 05:49 AM
2

The 23-year-old's attorney said she was a good citizen and the last person likely to become violent I guess I missed all other 6 billion people becoming violent...hmm.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/11/16 11:41 AM
4

Didn't read the article Of course you didn't. Because that would take effort, instead of the bullshit you vomited onto the keyboard. That child was 11. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights13/11/16 03:51 AM
6

That's the go to response of nearly all women when insulting men. Either dick size or "you're just like your father" if they know you well enough.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 08:09 AM
36

The inverse of this article is the Harvard mens soccer team's season being cancelled over "locker room talk"
/r/MensRights12/11/16 06:06 AM
2

I miss the times when higher education was a place to learn and expand, instead of shelter and protect.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:50 PM
3

"organizational Difficulties"....yeah okay.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:48 PM
9

I still have no idea what made her tell such huge and potentially very harmful lies ... because she was literally the person I paid the least attention to there This is probably why.
/r/MensRights11/11/16 10:35 PM
1

Obviously, no one cares about the men. They have their own suit in progress, but there won't be any media coverage about it. Gotta protect the narrative.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 10:40 PM
4

What a cunt.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 02:32 AM
9

It's just a shaming tactic designed to silence those who have opinions that are different. Check your priveledge means "shut up I'm right your wrong LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU"
/r/MensRights07/11/16 08:40 AM
6

1/320 is not acceptable. If one day every year you randomly woke up and got punched in the face, would you settle for it or would you demand change? I would demand change.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:07 AM
10

Source - the paragraph about the depo shot says this: "Research has shown that the median time for return to fertility is 10 months after the last shot" Interesting, no? Not permanent. Source - an excerpt from this one says "Everybody acts differently, some may take a couple of weeks to ovulate, other may take some months" Not permanent. Source Another source saying that depo use can result in temporary infertility. It also says that after pill use, your cycle can be fucky for months. Not perman…
/r/MensRights06/11/16 05:00 AM
14

It's not cherrypicking. I provided SEVERAL sources, of which you provided none.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:34 AM
21

If you have to exaggerate to make your point, maybe your point isn't worth making. At least he isn't telling a lie, like you are. Contrary to a popular myth, the pill has no negative impact on fertility. Says the entire first two pages of google.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:19 AM
17

Not only that, but there are also women who find themselves infertile for a long time after they use the pill for years; You're going to need to source this. Because of what I have read, this is a misstatement at best, and straight up lie at worst. Fernando Gomez, M.D. of the Reproductive Medicine Institute in Orlando, Florida, says there is no scientific evidence that birth control pills cause infertility. “This idea is a common misconception of patients using birth control pills for prolonged …
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:17 AM
12

Honestly, I'd still rather have Vasalgel than a hormonal treatment.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 11:10 PM
37

How incredibly ignorant. When your birth control causes permanent infertility, then you get to have an opinion on men being babies.
/r/MensRights05/11/16 11:09 PM
1

You seem to have a poor grasp of the word misogyny. Nothing I said was inherently misogynistic. It's more of a realist approach to the sexual marketplace that women have had absolute control over for the better part of 50 years. For men to have that kind of control over the reproductive strategies is quite the change. These comments are just an attempt at shaming men, like always happens. There is a good reason that there hasn't been a reliable form of birth control for men. If you want to hide …
/r/MensRights05/11/16 02:46 AM
1

I've read many comments on those articles. The general consensus is men are babies. Men can't be trusted for birth control. Women have it worse.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 01:07 AM
3

It's not just misandry, it's the simple fact that women will NEVER give up the rights to control birth. That is a source of power for them they won't give up without a war. The amount of control over men that the BC has given women is unparalleled. The moment men are in charge of their own reproductive destiny is the moment women realize their sexual marketplace control is dropping. Prepare for a battle guys. It won't be easy.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:12 PM
2

Yes. The falsely accused student is suing the magazine, and I think the writer personally.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:35 AM
23

I see your point. And it's a fair point. But I'd like to counter with maybe none of us, men or women, should take photos of strangers and shame them online, joking or not.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:47 PM
1

The role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in prostate carcinogenesis is highly controversial: some studies suggest a positive association between HPV infection and an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa), whereas others do not reveal any correlation. Seems like the jury is still out on this one.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 10:06 AM
3

including unequal pay I guess teaching kids lies shouldn't be surprising anymore. I couldn't even tell you how many lies I've been taught.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 09:52 AM
1

Which is pretty comical considering I bet the author believes that the 1/5 rape and 77% figures are real numbers. Talk about idiots and propaganda.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 12:56 AM
3

I'd hazard a guess that most men don't give a fuck what some idiot at the guardian tells them about shorts. The real question is where are the feminists complaining about "clothing-rape" of whatever buzzword they want to use now.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 09:38 AM
2

You don't deserve to be in an abusive relationship. I hope you heed peoples' advice here and get out of that situation. Best of luck mate.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:47 AM
1

Holy shit those comments are from some of the dumbest people alive. How they even managed to navigate to that website and mash their face against the keyboard accurately enough to form sentences is mind boggling.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:44 AM
2

Feminists have run out of things to complain about, so they now have to criticize fiction. It's not rape, because it's not real. End of story.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:30 AM
3

"Informed by Gamer Gate" I assume that means informed incorrectly.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 09:59 AM
28

But remember everyone, it's only rich white males that are spared prison.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:59 AM
1

This is good. Thank you for posting.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 07:00 AM
1

Just to elaborate, the POTUS has even touted that ridiculous 77cents bullshit. The POTUS for fucks sake. Pandering at its finest.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:46 AM
1

What a shame that is totally acceptable to tell half the population that they are "toxic" and to teach and enshrine hatred of themselves. Maybe all these men are killing themselves because they have been constantly berated into thinking they are worthless, violent, hateful, privileged nothings. And now when gather them all in a class, and force it down their throats some more. Yup. Seems like a great idea.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 06:44 AM
44

No shit men want nothing to do with college women these days. Anyone with half a brain saw it coming. You tell men their entire lives that they are rapists, pigs, hyper-masculine fuck bois that are entrenched in patriarchy and privilege...don't be fucking surprised when then cut you out of their lives. Men will get along just fine without you. Just like Dave Chapelle said, "Chivalry is dead, and women killed it."
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:53 AM
53

Meanwhile, 98 out of 100 accused rapists never serve a day in prison The problem with saying this is assuming that all 100 accused rapists actually did it. Even the Rainn data makes this egregious assumption. It says straight up on their website. Fuck this place.
/r/MensRights19/10/16 05:52 AM
4

If your reaction to the idea that maybe you should form conclusions based on facts rather than feelings is "very smart" to you, perhaps that's an indication that you're in need of some self-reflection. Holy fuck you are a condescending prick. Facts are all that matter. you're an anti-intellectual, anti-science ideologue So asking for studies to prove something means I'm anti-intellectual? Well I've learned my lesson. Don't feed the trolls.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:44 AM
3

/r/iamverysmart Again, you haven't shown me any studies. Just that you can. And I don't believe you. I know what the scientific method is. I'm asking you prove it. And you can't.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 01:25 AM
5

Show me the scientific evidence of "male privilege" You can't. Because there isn't one. Show me the scientific evidence of "hegemonic masculinity" You are so full of shit.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 12:52 AM
4

Feminism: The advocacy of women's superiority on the ground of the evilness of men and boys
/r/MensRights17/10/16 12:48 AM
23

“As so often happens in domestic abuse it is when a woman is pushed to breaking point and finally fights back that the police are called.” This fucking bullshit. Victim blaming "He Deserved It!!" nonsense. This is what we are up against. This is the nonsense we have to fight against.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:07 AM
5

This will likely drive more men to check put of society I think it will cause an entire generation of men to hate women. To resent women. To loathe everything about them. And then feminism and can look back and say, "see, men are pigs, they hate women!"
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:05 AM
2

That actually a very good point. A bunch of women standing around telling all the boys how they are damaged. All it is going to do is breed hatred and resentment. All the girls in the class are going are hold it over them for their entire academic career. These boys are going to hate women because of it. And then the feminists can use it as more fuel for the "toxic masculinity" and attempt to further brainwash and damage these young men. Shameful.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:02 AM
3

Time to step up and teach your cousin why he isn't damaged, just because he is a boy. Do the right thing!
/r/MensRights16/10/16 06:01 AM
21

In fact, up to 70 percent of cases involving allegations of abuse during custody disputes are deemed unnecessary or false. Just want to point this part out. What this article also has are things you can do when you find yourself in such a situation. This is a surprising piece from HuffPo.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 04:56 AM
8

Who would even go to this bullshit?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 04:21 AM
2

Think of it from the boys point of view. All your time growing up all you hear from all the women around you is how horrible of a person you are just for being male? What are you going to do? You are going to end up HATING all women.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 02:13 AM
19

It’s like making the females a weaker sex. We are not weaker. We do the same jobs, we take the same classes But this stupid person STILL made this about girls. Why can't we just help boys for once? Why does it always have to be wrapped around what is better for girls. How about we DON'T HIT ANYONE.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:50 AM
5

and why we just can't stop mutilating the genital of ALL children. Because it looks better cut. Then he will look like his father. Because it's cleaner. Because it prevents STDs. Did I get them all? Just to be clear, I think circumcision is bullshit, both boys and girls.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:48 AM
6

The option is to just leave. Out in public and your girlfriend/spouse is causing a scene? Fucking leave.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:40 AM
1

Clearly you didn't even read the article.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:38 AM
5

It just goes to show you that anything even remotely advantageous to men is considered sexist and wrong. Mens only barbershop? Shut that shit down. Mens only college scholarship? WOMEN NEED IT MORE! Mens only divorce lawyers? Fucking soggy kneed pigs. It's a damn shame.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:32 AM
0

Every rape case that results in a guilty verdict is PROOF of rape cultureTM and every rape case that results in a not-guilty verdict is proof of rape cultureTM . You just can't win.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:28 AM
8

where women working full-time earn yearly 80 percent of what men earn doing the same work, according to the Institute for Women's Policy Research based in Washington D.C. And there is still THIS BULLSHIT!
/r/MensRights16/10/16 12:19 AM
12

That's the thing about feminists. Every rape case that results in a guilty verdict is PROOF of rape cultureTM and every rape case that results in a not-guilty verdict is proof of rape cultureTM. You just can't win.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 09:57 PM
4

So we shouldn't care when people/places are actively breaking the law?
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:34 PM
15

To be quite frank, I think one of the few things that will draw more male teachers is money. Pay teachers more money, and you will get more male teachers.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:48 PM
3

Yeah and she also thinks women are the primary victims are war...not the countless dead men. But whatever, men don't matter, haven't you heard?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 01:10 PM
4

But remember everyone, it's only rich white males that get away with raping people.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 02:22 AM
9

Men don't get paid more in other industries because people think they look good, they get paid more because they're incorrectly perceived as being more competent for the position. I can make up bullshit too.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 05:06 PM
6

I doubt you even know what an endogenity problem is, let alone be able to explain it. The pay gap myth is EXHAUSTED in this sub. Move on.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 05:04 PM
67

I just wish the under-18 laws applied to both parties. Both people had sex with someone underage. If you are going to charge one, you need to charge both.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 01:47 PM
60

Manspreading is when a man sits in a chair, and his knees spread apart, due to the natural shape of his hips and pelvis. Feminists have co-opted this into a sexist term, saying that men take up more space ON PURPOSE as a way to oppress women. edit: spelling
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:44 PM
9

This idea that women had no voice in politics is insane. Nevermind the fact that women make up the largest voting body in the country. Women, who constitute more than half the population, have cast between four and seven million more votes than men in recent elections. In every presidential election since 1980, the proportion of eligible female adults who voted has exceeded the proportion of eligible male adults who voted http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/resources/genderdiff.pdf
/r/MensRights14/09/16 04:28 PM
8

Time to teach women to not traffic humans? /s, maybe
/r/MensRights08/09/16 07:29 PM
6

If anyone is in doubt of these sourceless numbers (as you should be), here is some information about Canadian DV: In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2016001/article/14303/01-eng.htm
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:22 PM
6

This is for Canada: In 2014, equal proportions of men and women reported being victims of spousal violence during the preceding 5 years (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2016001/article/14303/01-eng.htm
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:20 PM
6

It's because you can be wrong, and not be (intentionally) a lier. While this is true, I have a hard time believing she didn't know what she was doing. She was telling a big fat lie.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:13 PM
11

The clothing item is being banned. Both men and women can't wear it. The "right" is for both. Men ALSO cannot wear burkas. And since you don't seem to understand, the law in question bans ALL face covering items. ban on the wearing of face-covering headgear, including masks, helmets, balaclavas, niqābs and other veils covering the face in public places, except under specified circumstances. The ban also applies to the burqa, a full-body covering, if it covers the face. Again, I ask, name a right…
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:28 PM
8

But that's because women have still not been granted many rights that men have. Name one? In a non-third world country...
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:24 PM
22

I find it uniquely infuriating that women get mad about men wanting to not want to chop up their sons genitals.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 01:13 PM
1

You're own link says she did get raped No. It doesn't. Read past the headline. Maybe you will learn something.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 01:09 PM
3

Using their own tactics against them. I love it.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 07:08 PM
93

An quite frankly, paternity testing is surprisingly affordable (at least in the US).
/r/MensRights02/09/16 12:34 PM
2

omg, your so funny, lol haha....get over yourself.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/09/16 12:18 PM
7

And I'm saying their argument isn't legitimate. It also has nothing to do with TRP...but that won't stop you from bringing it up, apparently.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 08:01 PM
11

That is a legitimate issue Um, no it isn't. It's a god damn video game. You don't like it? Don't fucking play it.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/09/16 04:25 PM
4

No kidding. This is garbage.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 02:25 PM
3

I agree with you here. Complaining about this is just an utter waste of time. MRAs have bigger worries that who proposes to whom.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 07:33 PM
13

Oh and don't forget, Women have always been the primary victims of war. -HRC
/r/MensRights26/08/16 07:07 PM
8

Let’s not try to resolve it by discarding fundamental principles of justice that protect everyone. Crazy people with crazy ideas.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 07:28 PM
82

Positive ending = men aren't guilty, woman is punished. It's about as "positive" as we can expect these days.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/16 05:35 PM
2

The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=167327
/r/MensRights22/08/16 02:02 PM
43

But remember guys, it's only rich white men that get lenient prison sentences...
/r/MensRights22/08/16 01:28 PM
4

I don't think this bitch should even be on trial. Slippery slope. Everyone deserves a trial. Regardless of how shitty of a human being they are.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 06:33 PM
9

On the plus side: Jaski's attorneys say Jaski hasn't had any contact with the boy since he was removed from the Jaski family's home and placed in another state.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 06:20 PM
51

I know this. You know this. We all know this. But it still nice to read articles covering it.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 06:14 PM
1

Right, they just throw them in the dumpster.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 03:54 PM
26

Where are all the people and the media that were so upset about the "Stanford rapist" and his lenient sentence? This right here gets me. Facebook was loaded with all "another white male rapist walks free!" posts. I had to hold my tongue in pointing out that women always receive lesser punishments. But here we are again. Another women committing a crime, and another weak ass punishment. C'est la vie I suppose.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 12:39 PM
11

Oh well, at least she gets any prison time at all I guess. That must be the unusual part.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:23 PM
1

What were the tweets she was responding to?
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:26 PM
11

It's simple really, they can't. As in, the tweets don't exist.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:54 PM
4

It is never ending You are absolutely right.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 05:26 PM
12

even though every prison has the absolute right to not be raped, it is up to each prisoner to ensure their own safety. This right here is my problem with this 'college rape culture' nonsense. Try telling a feminist that ultimately it's up to her to ensure her own safety...
/r/MensRights14/07/16 04:29 PM
6

/s Is this really sarcasm though? Male spaces have been degrading for years. Even the Boy Scouts isn't immune to the degradation of male only spaces.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 04:22 PM
2

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 02:50 PM
37

Honestly, I think we should all do our part to make this happen. Treat women the way men are treated, invisible and disposable.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 02:14 PM
6

Please take a minute to read this as well: https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=167327 The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:26 PM
7

that is why there is an effort to teach men not to rape *Edit: The current argument
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:54 PM
7

these are not gender-specific crimes. You're right! They aren't! Which is why TEACHING ALL MEN not to rape is pointless. You either need to teach EVERYONE not to rape, or nothing it all.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:47 PM
6

Well that doesn't happen at a percentage even remotely close to rapes And? so that's not a very good analogy. It's the perfect analogy, it's a crime that some women seem to think isn't a crime. It's something that really ONLY women do so we should teach ALL women not to do it.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:38 PM
15

So by your own flawed logic, we need to teach all women not to throw babies in dumpsters. Because some of them think it is okay, but it really isn't. So we just need to teach ALL women that dumpster+baby=bad. Right? You must be all for this.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 03:17 PM
25

A lot of times people hear about these very isolated cases of an adult woman having sexual activities or conduct with a younger man Very isolated? Even in this seemingly helpful article, there is still this mantra "women are wonderful" I'm sick of this bullshit.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 03:15 PM
2

It's in her autobiography.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 04:28 PM
2

These troll posts are getting tiresome.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 07:44 PM
2

This post does not belong here, and is obviously from a troll account. Mods can you do something about it?
/r/MensRights28/06/16 07:18 PM
14

It's pretty clear to me the OP doesn't have any thoughts for herself about any of these issues. Most of what she is saying is just a list of feminist taking points with no real claim of evidence or truth. I had high hopes that maybe this feminist would be different, but I guess I was wrong.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 02:39 AM
7

Yeah I came here hoping for an actual discussion, and all I got was your typical feminist blaming all the world's problems on men. Disappointing.
/r/MensRights27/06/16 02:34 AM
1044

Please please please rock the boat on this one OP.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 05:36 PM
5

I think is probably the right answer. Be as transparent as you can. Cite the particular codes/laws if you can.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:36 PM
15

"Women have always been the primary victims of war." -Hillary Clinton
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:24 PM
-2

Honestly, this is just a lot of rambling with no real facts. Downvote.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 05:07 PM
3

Do you have any examples? I've never really seen religion presented at all in this sub, with the exception of circumcision discussions.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:58 PM
12

Sadly this isn't the first time I've read about something like this. But I don't think this is representative of larger feminist population. While this is clearly something despicable to do/say, I don't think this has any chance of becoming a trend.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:17 PM
5

Women contribute nothing to society except babies Well just isn't true at all. There have been plenty of contributions by women.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 06:51 PM
9

It's healthy for your penis Categorically false. it reduces the risk of cancer Citation needed. makes your penis easier to clean. Because scrubbing is so hard to do. SMH.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 06:43 PM
4

Not to mention he sent our messages threatening to kill them Not a single person in this thread that has claimed this can provide a source. Not even you. So it likely isn't true. Later on in the messages, it says its because he was a rapist, but of course that little bit is left out of the crazy propaganda your listening to. Several links above highlight the messages that were released, include the text you think is missing. Propaganda? No. If that's not guilty, I don't know what is. That's up f…
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:42 PM
4

Everyone making that claim can't/hasn't provided a source. So I'm going to go with no, it's not accurate.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:38 PM
8

The defense publicly released their evidence, so that's why your hearing that side The prosecution has text messages from him threatening to kill the girls if they went public about the rape. If the prosecution hasn't released evidence, how could you POSSIBLY know this? You can't.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:36 PM
52

Manflu, manspreading, mansplaining...why don't feminists pick a real problem for once? All of this manufactured outrage is getting old and tiring.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 03:41 PM
15

Milo is right. Feminism is cancer.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 07:39 PM
5

My understanding of the situation, albeit limited, was that the Japanese men just have no interest in dating at all. They are just abstaining from the whole thing.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:26 PM
7

Yes. I realize that is the truth of the matter. But if you read the article that was posted, it's pretty clear the feminists are saying that women can't do these jobs, so they deserve special treatment because of it.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 02:26 PM
16

The feminist opposition to this stimulus doesn't even make any fucking sense. This country NEEDS infrastructure repair. It needs it desperately. And the feminists oppose that because "women can't do those jobs" GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:57 PM
13

And what's more frustrating about the Stanford case is that everyone is saying "see how easy rapists get off??" And they conveniently neglect the fact that female rapists get super light punishments practically every time, and that's for raping children!
/r/MensRights11/06/16 06:51 PM
1

I'm not sure. But my point is there isn't anything corroborating it.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:56 PM
0

Yes, but it hasn't been proven false either. That's all I'm saying. I don't know if it's true or false.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 11:13 AM
3

Petty? Maybe. Untrue? Hard to tell.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 10:25 PM
2

Really fucking stupid. It's pretty easy to demonstrate gravity.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 05:47 PM
4

Because they are saying that a black man, when cleaned, turns Asian. Meaning black = dirty.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:13 PM
1

Do you have a link for this? I would love to have the information in my back pocket for the "feminists help men too!" argument.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 12:54 PM
3

She literally uses the words "Every Man." So again, fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 02:20 PM
3

Except she did actually say those words. Fuck off.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:57 PM
3

every man This means ALL MEN. Yes, you are that dumb.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:21 PM
6

Got it. You are just as sexist as the woman in the post. Understood. Congratulations for being a terrible person.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 01:09 PM
2

This writer is not saying that you or any particular man is a creep, THE WRITER LITERALLY SAID THAT ALL MEN ARE CREEPS. HOW DUMB ARE YOU?
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:55 PM
2

"Not all blacks!" -Yes but enough blacks that every while person is terrified of smiliing to that black guy on the bus or talking with the black guy in the coffee ship. Every white person has been walking late at night at one point and been afraid of who might be following them. Every white person has referred to someone as a nigger and every white person has refused a drink from someone they don't know. Not all blacks. But enough blacks that all white people are now afraid of most black people.…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:53 PM
2

Because it's not reasonable. Is this reasonable: "Not all blacks!" -Yes but enough blacks that every while person is terrified of smiliing to that black guy on the bus or talking with the black guy in the coffee ship. Every white person has been walking late at night at one point and been afraid of who might be following them. Every white person has referred to someone as a nigger and every white person has refused a drink from someone they don't know. Not all blacks. But enough blacks that all …
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:50 PM
4

Does this sound reasonable? If you, you are even more terrible human being that I initially thought. "Not all blacks!" -Yes but enough blacks that every while person is terrified of smiliing to that black guy on the bus or talking with the black guy in the coffee ship. Every white person has been walking late at night at one point and been afraid of who might be following them. Every white person has referred to someone as a nigger and every white person has refused a drink from someone they don…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:48 PM
1

Here OP, go blow up facebook: "Not all blacks!" -Yes but enough blacks that every while person is terrified of smiliing to that black guy on the bus or talking with the black guy in the coffee ship. Every white person has been walking late at night at one point and been afraid of who might be following them. Every white person has referred to someone as a nigger and every white person has refused a drink from someone they don't know. Not all blacks. But enough blacks that all white people are no…
/r/MensRights06/05/16 12:47 PM
41

Well these people aren't exactly smart now are they...
/r/MensRights04/05/16 07:38 PM
3

Fuck.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 03:56 PM
6

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4gsbm0/so_hillary_has_just_announced_that_women_will/d2ksvrv
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:25 PM
13

I find the following to be relevant: The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=167327
/r/MensRights27/04/16 07:36 PM
5

And the rest of the speech has this tone I associate with a kind of feminist triumphalism thinly veiled as concern - what's the matter with our boys: our girls are smart and sassy and full of moxie, and the boys are just kind of ... STUPID. And this is the problem that I have too. If girls/women don't succeed, it's because the system is broken and society is sexist and men are pigs. If boys/men don't succeed it's because they are stupid or lazy or inferior and don't deserve any help.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 08:06 PM
2

This is how animals are treated, not human beings.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 06:57 PM
18

Maybe some day she will be a big girl and do more than that Doing more than giving hints, to this girl, would be rape. This much is clear.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 06:15 PM
10

The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. https://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=167327
/r/TheRedPill18/04/16 05:26 PM
8

Why the FUCK are women trying to tell MEN what to do with THEIR GENITALS! THIS MAKES ME SO MAD!
/r/MensRights15/04/16 03:49 PM
1

Just adding the word "accusations" at the end would help immensely.
/r/MensRights15/04/16 03:40 PM
15

Your parents don't even believe you? I have no words of advice. But consider this a lesson learned. You know now that your parents will sell you up a shit creek without a paddle. You can now plan your life WITHOUT them in it, because it's clear they don't give a shit about you.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:27 PM
7

It's proven over and over again that women do not receive equal pay for equal work so that is something that needs to be considered." It literally has never been proven. Not once. Never. Fucking idiots.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:21 PM
16

I doubt she understands the meaning of A Clockwork Orange.
/r/MensRights11/04/16 03:53 PM
19

Holy shit, this is a great source: The Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency reports that the most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families
/r/MensRights08/04/16 07:03 PM
4

Exactly. If feminists claim that "men consent to the risk of having a child when they consent to sex" to deny them reproductive rights, then they also don't get to rely on men to fund their OWN reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 06:27 PM
5

If I was at this school, I would not consent to being recorded in the lab. Doesn't this violate some kind of student policy? You HAVE to have access to the labs as an engineering student. But I don't want to be recorded.
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:52 PM
3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model It actually is from MN, not MI
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:51 PM
2

Good money bet is on the results reading as follows: "We find male engineer microagressions to occur all the time, but don't ask us what they are, because we can't tell you. But trust us, our feels were hurt."
/r/MensRights06/04/16 07:50 PM
1

Report it and see what happens.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:12 PM
19

Or is afraid, like these women? They say the carraiges will have greater CCTV coverage, greater foot patrols, more distress buttons. Why are women only allowed to feel safe? Why can't men feel safe too?
/r/MensRights05/04/16 02:08 PM
9

I'm at work, can someone give me a TL;DR?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 06:13 PM
15

So you are saying that Statutory rape charges shouldn't exist? That Anyone of any age should be allowed to sleep with children if they so chose?
/r/MensRights01/04/16 05:18 PM
1

Except they aren't grossly underpaid. http://www.businessinsider.com/womens-small-soccer-salaries-are-fair-2015-7
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:29 PM
1

http://www.businessinsider.com/womens-small-soccer-salaries-are-fair-2015-7 You are exactly right.
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:28 PM
1

They don't deserve it. http://www.businessinsider.com/womens-small-soccer-salaries-are-fair-2015-7
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:28 PM
1

Read this and see if you still agree. http://www.businessinsider.com/womens-small-soccer-salaries-are-fair-2015-7
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:28 PM
1

It's not true. http://www.businessinsider.com/womens-small-soccer-salaries-are-fair-2015-7
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:27 PM
1

It's not true. http://www.businessinsider.com/womens-small-soccer-salaries-are-fair-2015-7
/r/MensRights01/04/16 02:27 PM
15

General rule of thumb, if a women (or anyone) tries to tell you how to be man, tell her to shut the fuck up and be whatever man you want to be.
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:23 PM
11

by claiming it can't be expected to find key evidence. If they can't be bothered to find evidence, they SHOULD NOT be allowed to be in charge of the investigating/punishing. Kurker was asked if things an accuser says that indicate the encounter was consensual would be considered irrelevant if the accuser eventually changed her mind to claim the encounter was sexual assault. Kurker answered "yes," over the objections of attorneys. So, to Kurker, it's not relevant what an accuser initially believe…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:19 PM
3

Unfortunately for him, even after being found not guilty, he will forever been seen as guilty.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 05:06 PM
9

it is unfair that a man will draw bigger crowds just because he is a man He doesn't draw bigger crowds because he is a man, he draws bigger crowds because he is better, and those matches are better.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:42 PM
8

It SHOULD be some form of either assault or maybe fraud if you told her you had had a vasectomy & hadn't & you were having sex to force her to become pregnant So if a woman lies about being on birth control, and gets pregnant, you wall that some form of assault or fraud as well?
/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:33 PM
9

Serena Williams is a fucking idiot. "I wouldn't say my son deserved more money than my daughter because he's a man. It would be shocking." It's not because he is a man that he earns more, it's because he draws bigger crowds, fills more seats, and brings in more money. "This was never meant to be made into a fight between genders and differences in pay, but in the way all players are rewarded for their play and effort. Which is precisely the point that Serena can't seem to grasp. I wouldn't expec…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 01:15 PM
66

The hopeless fear Warmbier is now experiencing is my daily reality living in a country where white men like him are willfully oblivious to my suffering even as they are complicit in maintaining the power structures which ensure their supremacy at my expense The audacity. Look at what YOU are doing right now! Sitting in front of your computer in your air conditioned starbucks drinking a mocha frappa bullshit whining about your oppression.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:59 PM
9

Am I the only one that doesn't believe this guy "tried to steal a banner" and that it's just NK propaganda and trying to send a message? Why do we believe NK when they say that's what he did?
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:57 PM
13

The empathy gap is real.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:34 PM
1

That the reason he consumed that many chicken mcnuggets was for a calorie goal Because that is what people do, you idiot. not because those were the portions he was used to eating? Because a set calorie goal IS WHAT HE WAS USED TO EATING. You must be doing this on purpose. No one can be this fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 04:22 PM
1

Source for what? A source for thermodynamics? A source for a basic understanding of energy expenditure. A source that shows that eating calories maintains body weight? How stupid are you? You eat food. Food has calories. Eating more calories then you burn causes you to gain weight (which you should know, since you're fat). Eating less calories means you lose weight. BASIC. He ate that much BECAUSE HE NEEDED TO. If he didn't eat enough calories, he would have been in an energy deficit. IT IS THAT…
/r/MensRights22/03/16 02:13 PM
1

Don't be stupid. Of course he has control of what he eats. No one force fed him.he chose to eat that, and he chose to eat that much, because he needed the energy, because of how much he was spending while competing. Don't be a moron. Use your brain. Think critically. You aren't making any sense.
/r/MensRights22/03/16 01:44 PM
1

Furthermore, he didn't calculate the calories, the reporter did. And? You can calculate it right now if you weren't so lazy. McNugget has a known caloric value. So do the math. you cannot take his caloric intake under special circumstances and pretend that his normal caloric intake. Your complete lack of nutritional awareness is unfortunate. He caloric intake would be greater when is he training. Because that's how you build muscle.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:44 PM
1

The choice of food doesn't matter. It's the calories. He ate at least 4700 a day. It could have been in the form of milkshakes for all I care. But the SIMPLE fact is, he used at least 4700 a day. This could not be simpler to understand. If you eat more than you burn, you get fat (which you should know, since you are fat). Bolt is not fat, so he burn what he eats. So if he ate 4700, he burned 4700. How did he burn that much? By competing and training. This is basic stuff here.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:55 PM
1

How dense are you? It's a calorie. It is a measure of energy content.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:38 PM
1

one time. For 10 days. While competing.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:26 PM
1

Um... no you didn't. You provided the energy consumption during the olympics when the only thing he could eat were Chicken McNuggets. It doesn't matter the source of the food, what matters is the caloric content. It's pretty astonishing that you can't understand that. That is LITERALLY not what you are doing here. So numbers and facts are irrelevant? The word of Usain Bolt himself about his caloric intake isn't good enough? Got it. Guess I'm debating with a child.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:24 PM
1

Seriously? That is not his daily intake, nor his daily burn. Right, that's why I said AT LEAST. And yes, it is his daily burn, otherwise he would be getting fat. Which is he isn't. It's basics here. First, you can't compare, without both sides of the data. So provide the data and lets get comparing. Secondly, no, sprinting isn't nearly as intensive with training as long distance running. Again, just because you say it doesn't make it true. I am provide energy expenditure numbers for the worlds t…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 08:20 PM
1

Source? I looked for some verification of this, and couldn't find anything to support this. http://time.com/3912896/usain-bolt-chicken-mcnuggets-olympics/ From the article: 4,700 calories worth of Chicken McNuggets a day One, sprinter training isn't as intensive as long distance runner training. Again, you keep saying it, but that doesn't make it true. He uses so many calories because his training uses a lot of energy. And why does he use a lot of energy? Because training for sprint races is int…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:40 PM
2

However, training for a 30 second run, isn't nearly as intensive as training for a 2 hour run. You keep repeating it, but that doesn't make it true. Look at the overall energy expenditure going on here. Usain burns over 4800 calories A DAY. That is a lot of energy. More so than 99% of the population. And to say that isn't as intensive as long distance training is deliberately obtuse.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 07:10 PM
1

Usain Bolt trains to put an insane amount of energy out for 30 seconds. In one race. Mo Farah trains to put a moderate (just a little less than insane) amount of energy out for 2 hours (26 mile record run). In one race. While Usain Bolt does put a lot more energy in those 30 seconds, Mo Farah is still putting out energy for another 1 hour 59 minutes 30 seconds. Yes I agree. Mo expends far more energy training than Usain does. Usain doesn't do one 30 second run and call it a day for training. You…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 05:38 PM
10

It is LITERALLY words you typed.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 04:15 PM
1

Sprint training is far easier than long distance training. Yes, Farah trains significantly harder than Bolt. I'm not sold on this. If the difficulty in training is determined by the effort put in, and that effort is determined by energy expenditure, doesn't sprinting use more calories than long distance running? I'm not expert here, but I think the training is probably, energy expenditure wise, pretty comparable.
/r/MensRights21/03/16 03:38 PM
9

I can't load the youtube video since I'm at work, however, I take issue with this, He then basicly defined been a male feminist as supporting and demanding equally. Supporting and demanding equality is not a feminist trait. Which is backed by mountains of evidence to the contrary. All feminism even though it's an incredibly wide term with plenty of groups that are benign or positive. You can always pretend those bits are also the nutter fringes. When the nutter fringes are shouting the loudest a…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:59 PM
24

Women should be given more money for less productivity You can't honestly believe this?
/r/MensRights21/03/16 01:15 PM
1

Right, even so, he is being accused of making sexually coloured remarks
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:02 PM
4

making sexually coloured remarks
/r/MensRights18/03/16 07:02 PM
3

Only 6% of men on the planet become self-made billionaires. Let's at least be real here, it's WAY less than 6% A total of 1,645 people made the 2014 billionaire list says google. One paper, from one school, of 1882 men, with p=.05. I will reassert my original statement. Over 170 million men are rapists? Nope, I'll need more evidence than that.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:36 PM
4

You are just as wrong. 5% of men are rapists? So you think there are 173,891,481 rapists? HOLY FUCK WE ARE ALL IN DANGER!
/r/MensRights18/03/16 05:48 PM
7

Delusional.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:50 PM
4

Because they don't want equality. They want superiority.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 04:19 PM
7

As a result, ESPN’s documentary on the case, “Fantastic Lies,” has been taken to task by several reviewers for being too sympathetic to the falsely accused men. The mental gymnastics required to to be "too sympathetic" to the REAL VICTIMS here is astounding.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 07:24 PM
3

It's generally considered dangerous to be below 5% BF for men for extended periods of time. Only 1 or 2 of those guys look to be about in the 5% range. The rest look like a healthy, not impossible but very difficult sub 10% BF range. They definitely hit the genetic lottery though.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:09 PM
16

Yale a fuck ton of money. And I hope this guys gets every god damn penny of it.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/16 07:07 PM
2

They reference themselves for statistics? What a joke. Good on you for cancelling.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 08:44 PM
10

Just more grasping at straws to demonize men. It's starting to get pathetic.
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:19 PM
9

nothing will change until women's lives matter more. Matter more than what? It's already women and children first. It's already assume the man is at fault is DV cases. It's already women have bodily autonomy and men don't. It's already women receive shorter prison sentence then men. How much more proof positive do you need that women's live do matter more?
/r/MensRights11/03/16 03:13 PM
9

Now I wonder how they would react to this. Shrug it off and pretend like nothing happened, or "I DON'T CARE HE'S STILL GUILTY CUZ MUH FEELZ" The court of public opinion is nothing to fuck with.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 02:00 PM
28

So much bullshit. Better start indoctrinating the kiddies young. Gotta make sure that little boy is ashamed to be a boy for the rest of his life. No problem here. Everyone move along.
/r/MensRights10/03/16 01:45 PM
5

but he doesn't represent the majority of MRA He doesn't represent any MRAs, he has said himself that he is not one.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:44 PM
8

Roosh himself has said he is not MRA. He has literally said those words.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:43 PM
13

Yeah no. Roosh is ADAMANTLY not an MRA, he says it himself. So you'll have to do better next time.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 01:43 PM
7

But what can he do? Seems to me his only option is to move somewhere else. It's a shame really, but what are his options?
/r/MensRights08/03/16 04:00 PM
9

Get the fuck out of here with that "good."
/r/MensRights07/03/16 08:38 PM
3

We agree there is no medical purpose. And there-in is the crux of it for me. If there is no reason to do it, but you are doing it anyway, I feel as though it is akin to torture.
/r/MensRights04/03/16 06:14 PM
4

So forcing an infant down, restraining him, and forcibly removing a part of his body without anesthesia isn't akin to torture?
/r/MensRights04/03/16 05:49 PM
7

To be fair, the maximum sentence is "Life in Prison" according to the article. So at least there is chance for more than just a slap on the wrist.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 08:31 PM
31

Holy fuck did you read that bullshit? As a custodial parent, she will be able to spend the money the husband pays in child support exactly as she pleases. Not for the children mind you, AS SHE PLEASES. Even more, that entire PDF pretty much blames MEN for the higher divorce rates initiated by women. DON'T YOU KNOW MEN? IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT YOUR WIFE WANTS TO LEAVE YOU!!! edit: I would copy/paste more quotes but I can't copy from the article.
/r/MensRights03/03/16 06:19 PM
7

Blue Earth County Attorney Pat McDermott tells KTOE News that his office is considering charges against the mother.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:01 PM
63

The states will fuck you men any way they can.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 07:44 PM
1

I think that is the winning strategy. Use their OWN words, but apply their "reasoning" to disenfranchised men.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:03 PM
1

I agree. We don't need to be petulant about it. The more mature we are in our positions, the more serious people see our cause.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:00 PM
2

I tend to agree with you on this. I occasionally have to pass a respirator fit test at my place of employment. And the only way to pass is to be clean shaven. So once a year I shave to I can pass the test. It is for my protection though. If I can't properly form a fit on my face from a respirator than I can't wear said respirator effectively and it may result in my injury or death.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 05:57 PM
1

I'll just leave this here: Equal proportions of men and women with current or former spouses or partners reported being victims of spousal violence (4%, respectively). This translated into about 342,000 women and 418,000 men across the provinces. Moreover, similar declines in spousal violence were recorded for both sexes since 2004 (Table 1.2).
/r/MensRights26/02/16 07:13 PM
42

What a damning indictment of young men and boys. And a damning indictment of our society at large.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 04:17 PM
4

He is saying to reserve judgement because all the facts aren't out...and the facts probably won't come out BECAUSE he is a minor.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 07:37 PM
2

Domestic violence usually refers to intimate partner violence, most commonly by men against women Is this true though? Maybe in Australia, but isn't the US domestic violence pretty much split right down the middle? and respectful relationship programs will be compulsory in schools from this year. This policy will likely just start telling young boys that they are all violent rapists in waiting and they should be ashamed of being a boy. Because that's what these young impressionable young boys ne…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:31 PM
1

I understand they aren't COTWAs words, but it is framed as though this is some kind of godsend for the accused. They don't appear to be as critical of this as I feel they should be.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 06:36 PM
10

This, on the surface, sounds like a good thing. But I can't get past a few things. “I work to help just ensure that abuse doesn’t happen, that no one gets abused again. So my hope is that they really, truly can be productive So this accused advocate is already approaching the situation that the accused is guilty. “My concern would be that if you have a ... position designated to the accused, when in fact [under Title IX] they have equal access to ... the same resources available as the accuser, …
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:58 PM
28

It's not social suicide. No one brings a false accusation on themselves. It's a social murder, a deliberate act to destroy a person.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 01:21 AM
7

Maybe, but try this spin: If we improve the lives of men, we improve the lives of everyone else.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 08:59 PM
1

This is kind of the opposite if you read the article. Improve the lives of men, and the rest will follow suit.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 08:58 PM
3

Innocent until proven guilty, lest we forget.
/r/MensRights15/02/16 03:17 PM
7

It's been long touted here in /r/mensrights that the only real change to family law will happen when women start being screwed by it. This is just that theory in action.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:15 PM
108

Go to the R.A. and tell them that such sexist material does not belong in your dorm room. Go to whoever is in charge of your student housing department and say the same thing. Go speak to your Title IX officer about this to. Don't let this bullshit stand. You must do something if we want to see real change.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 05:12 PM
2

Honestly if someone said I was mansplaining to them, I would have a hard time not bursting out with laughter. How can anyone use that world in seriously? It's so utterly ridiculous.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:34 PM
3

Good to know you're just as sexist as your daughter then. Guess the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:32 PM
2

Yes, but the word was 2014s word of the year. What's the problem? If you take a look at the list, manspread made it for 2015. Those people are fucked in the head.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:31 PM
1

Jesus fucking christ, manspreading is on the list too. What a crazy fucking world we live in.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 02:28 PM
11

Souad Faress, is her name. Souad Faress falsely accused this man of sexual assault. Souad Faress deserves to be punished. Souad Faress. Souad Faress. Souad Faress. Souad Faress.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/16 03:47 PM
11

I was hoping for a bit more meat in this article. Pretty thin. But the results are expected I guess. Haven't we known for quite some time that video games don't cause violence either? Isn't this pretty much the same thing?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 05:07 PM
1

I don't have a link, maybe someone would like to dig it up, but didn't the DOJ or the CDC or someone come out with a stat that said 1 in 2000 in college campuses or something?
/r/MensRights10/02/16 01:47 PM
8

We can’t just assume there are two sides and those two sides are equally weighted.” This is such an absurd statement. I hope someone accuses this guy of sexual assault so he can learn how incredibly important these "two sides" actually are. What an embarrassing human being. edit: accidentally a word
/r/MensRights09/02/16 06:44 PM
4

How do you even debate this? What do you say to someone that honestly believes this?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:20 PM
3

I think she has been polling well with women over 35 or 40 or something. I'm pretty sure Sanders has the overwhelming majority of young women voters.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:14 PM
1

He has the young women vote, coincidentally aren't young women less likely to identify as feminist?
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:11 PM
12

I think this is more important than due process on campus. Due process on campus, to me, implies that colleges will still be doing the investigating, which is something they shouldn't be doing.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:10 PM
7

It's not really something people in the real world talk about though.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 03:49 PM
3

I would like to agree with your assessment, but when you combine it with stats that show less men than ever are graduating highschool, and overall mens grades are dropping, I think there is at least a reason to pause and ask, why?
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:53 PM
2

That...is depressing.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 08:49 PM
1

So the original of this is "womens lives are sooo much harder than yours, so you need to shut the fuck up about whatever you think is a problem. Because it isn't a problem. Because you're a man." Is that right? The victimhood Olympics are in full swing, and the feminists are winning. Congratu-fucking-lations.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:10 PM
9

Because boys are graduating college less and less, boys are getting less high school diplomas, and boys are falling behind in elementary education. The disenfranchisement is real and measurable. That is why it's a MR issue.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 06:53 PM
9

You don't think /r/MensRights legitimately criticizes feminism? Are you serious? If anything I think we spend TOO much time criticizing and complaining about feminism, and not enough time talking about solutions to the problems.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 02:30 PM
2

This is from CNN: 65.7% - The percentage of eligible female voters who voted in the 2008 election. 61.5% - The percentage of eligible male voters who voted in the 2008 election.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 01:52 PM
1

Granted my quick Google on the matter might not be reliable information. So take it with a grain of sand.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 11:01 PM
19

Already there my friend, already there.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 08:22 PM
9

I mean, technically it is, since there are more female voters than male. Granted men vote more than women, there are still more eligible women voters than men.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 07:54 PM
39

It's sad that it has come to this. Not only does this young boy already have a disadvantaged start to his education, but now he will, without some serious hard work and dedication, be behind for the rest of his education. All because he is "just a boy." Is it so hard to look through the gender of the child and see someone in need rather than "just a boy?" The empathy gap is real.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 04:00 PM
4

Which state is that?
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:55 PM
1

Without a doubt it will be blamed on sexism. What I would really like to see is a breakdown of the gender of people that go see that movie in theaters. I'm even willing to bet that MOST of the audience will be male. But it will STILL be blamed on sexism.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 08:54 PM
22

Harvey, a mother of two, was sentenced to eight months home detention, 100 hours community service and 20 months of judicial monitoring, with the judge saying the Manukau District Court prison could have a negative impact on the 23-year-old. So prison is only harmful to women? Huh.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 08:24 PM
1

Well, if you are rich, you can sue. But if you are normal non-privileged shitlord, you're pretty much out of luck.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 05:13 PM
14

It's not strictly about the age, it's about that this Teacher had a position of authority over the boys in question. Teachers should not be sleeping with their underage pupils.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 04:14 PM
3

Did she at least get fined for littering?
/r/MensRights21/01/16 08:59 PM
3

This is the take home from the article: As shown above, once we start controlling individually for the many relevant factors that affect earnings, e.g. hours worked, age, marital status and having children, most of the raw earnings differential disappears. In a more comprehensive study that controlled for all of the relevant variables simultaneously, we would likely find that those variables would account for nearly 100% of the unadjusted, raw earnings differential of 17% lower earnings for wome…
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:56 PM
3

The article states the timeline as follows: Man offer chip Woman refuses with some 'comment' Man dumps chips over head Third party, the assaulter, stabs man in eye.
/r/MensRights21/01/16 02:51 PM
2

Yeah can we get a mod to remove this or something?
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:32 PM
9

So I can't explicitly find on the 100 Women Who Care website that they specifically exclude men, however they do say this: Are you a Woman Who Cares? Which implies to me you must be a women. They then link to the mens site: Kelowna men have their own version, and these local guys are making an impact. So even the local womens group supports the local mens group. It just this one busy body Ilya Park that can't stand men coming together for a good cause.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 06:18 PM
29

Well at least now you know and can take the appropriate precautions.
/r/MensRights20/01/16 05:20 PM
8

This is just more complaining about how feminists won't take any responsibility for their own actions and simply cry and whine about how things don't include more women. You want more women to edit Wikipedia? Go ahead and fucking edit it. You want more women on the best-sellers list? Go write a fucking book. You want more women in STEM? GO INTO FUCKING STEM! The lack of agency here is mind-numbing.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:08 PM
6

The author is THIS article is being sarcastic, because another author of the ORIGINAL CONTENT posted it being serious. As least that's what I gathered.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 08:54 PM
9

While this is good news, what would have prevented her from destroying all these "documents" the moment the shit hit the fan? Should we honestly expect any relevant documents to be provided?
/r/MensRights13/01/16 09:19 PM
2

/r/KotakuInAction
/r/MensRights30/12/15 01:43 PM
2

And the article ends with this gem: The results of this work transform individual lives while also benefiting our economy and society as a whole So have less educated men is good for society? How?
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:08 PM
17

https://archive.is/Ahf6j
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:08 PM
7

During the past three years, the epidemic of college sexual assault -- with the sobering statistic that 1-in-5 women can expect to be assaulted during her four-year college career -- has become part of the national conversation. Nevermind that this is categorically false. An earlier report by the National Council on Crime and Delinquency found that 38 percent of women who were sexually assaulted while in college had been previously sexually assaulted before entering college, making past assaults…
/r/MensRights15/12/15 09:04 PM
3

“believe the women” is no substitute for evidence. This cannot be said enough. There is no substitute for evidence. Period.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:37 PM
8

Okay, I understand your point in that you can't 'force' anyone to report a crime to police. But if they don't report it to the police, how is reasonable to expect any real form of justice?
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:17 PM
1

Show me where on this chart it is saying men are oppressed? You can't. Nobody is saying here that men are oppressed. What is being said that 'male privilege' is a buzzword that doesn't mean what feminists think it means. Downvote for bringing nothing to the discussion.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:46 PM
2

What's even more stupid about that reply, the VERY FIRST RESULT says that only 38% of women identify as feminists (Cosmo) and the next from NYTimes says 82% DON'T identify as feminist. Laughable.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 09:01 PM
2

Got a source for this? I would love to have that info in my back pocket.
/r/MensRights02/12/15 01:46 PM
2

Can we contact anyone over at CNN about this? This isn't just incorrect, it's deliberately misleading. Edit: I sent whoever answers the "Contact Us" an email expressing my distaste for their 'article'
/r/MensRights19/11/15 10:17 PM
12

Wow. A witness even said he apologized and tried to get off at the next station but the women wouldn't let him.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 07:19 PM
2

How sad is it that "Department of Human Rights" is anywhere on that list.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:34 PM
3

Didn't she say that it has somewhat changed her views? I was under the impression the movie would be a good, critical view, and not another feminist rag. How naive of me, I suppose.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:02 PM
2

Every time someone talks about that movie in this sub, I try to point out that if you google "The Red Pill" the first results is /r/TheRedPill The name of that movie couldn't have been more poorly chosen.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:59 PM
1

Yeah my eye roll at this statement could have knocked a building down. Boys are shamed CONSTANTLY for their sexuality.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:55 PM
6

Yes true, but if you google "The Red Pill" and take a look at the results....
/r/MensRights12/11/15 07:32 PM
3

Men are attacked even more often than women. It is a well known fact that men are the victims of violence at a much larger rate than women.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:46 PM
2

She is saying "listen fathers, mothers do way more than you, so you don't deserve this day of praise you get."
/r/MensRights09/11/15 12:08 PM
17

Granted this is hyperbolic, but it's hyperbolic on purpose.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:51 PM
30

If you are told constantly by everyone around you that you are shit at painting, and you should just not paint because it sucks. No one would ever want to look at your painting because of bad it is. In fact, all your painting will be burned the moment you finish...would you still keep painting? Likely not. Granted this is hyperbolic, but it's hyperbolic on purpose.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 07:42 PM
3

We downvote you because your opinion is not helpful and adds nothing to the discussion. A university group should protect its students from unwarranted ideological challenges, and shouldn't provide platforms that effectively endorse the ideologies of people who demean their students This is literally what a university should not do.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 03:38 PM
315

You know, if everyone keeps spewing hate that fathers are not needed nor wanted, men will stop becoming fathers.
/r/MensRights08/11/15 01:40 PM
7

Does she just want to look at dongs?
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:56 PM
6

Googling "The Red Pill" the first result is /r/TheRedPill and the second result is the kickstarter movie....
/r/MensRights05/11/15 03:13 PM
2

Yeah, but did you read the article? Over and over "white people" not "white men"
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:34 PM
-1

I've got to downvote this article. With the exception of the title, and one sentence in the body, the author frames this as a "white people" problem, not a "white man" problem. While the cause of this increased mortality is certainly food for thought, I don't think this is entirely in the MRA sphere. Thoughts?
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:54 PM
1

In the article, the mother that complains wonders why it wasn't a: ice cream social or movie night Because it's fucking science not a slumber party. God damn some people are so fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:28 PM
1

Almost all neonatacides are committed by the mother (killing of an infant within it's first 24 hours of life).
/r/MensRights29/10/15 10:55 PM
1

Honestly I think this should be response. Throw in their faces how ridiculous they are being.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/15 10:48 PM
17

A good first step toward gaining market share might be to put more women at the top How about instead of putting them there, they earn it, like the rest of us?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 09:01 PM
37

The challenge for companies is to make fitness more accessible to women. For instance, most health clubs are expensive and designed for men. They can feel more like nightclubs than fitness centers and are geared to bodybuilders. Generally, women are less interested in pumping themselves up than in shedding a few pounds, improving their cardiovascular health, and getting toned. Bright lights, electronic music, sweaty men, and complicated equipment are often a turnoff. This just plain isn't true. …
/r/MensRights27/10/15 08:57 PM
37

There is a specific facial cream that uses 'foreskin' as an ingredient. Can't remember the name. Oprah peddled it for a while.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 12:11 PM
7

Agreed. This kind of stupid shit doesn't belong anywhere in the subreddit.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:23 PM
10

Can we get an archive link? No need to give this guy any traffic.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 04:59 PM
52

Look at this bullshit... Although the neurons have only been found in the brains of nematode worms, scientists at University College London say that it is likely that similar mechanisms are at work in humans. and... Although we have not looked in humans
/r/MensRights14/10/15 08:55 PM
3

But for some reason this isn't a human rights violation.....
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:52 PM
1

Shame on every single one of those students and parents that participated in that walkout. One of these days their bigotry is going to hit them, and hit them hard.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 08:14 PM
4

I can't stand to read any more about circumcision. It's just one of those things that needs to end, and I know there isn't a damn thing I can do, and there isn't a damn person that listens to me. It's incredibly demotivating.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:51 PM
24

This intrigues me. Can we take her picture and post it around the campus warning men to have no interaction with her? Don't say why, just say some like "This person must be avoided by men at all costs."
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:28 PM
12

As a female cyclist, you are all too often the target of a particularly unsavoury male aggression. How do these people function? This is just complete stupidity.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:02 PM
18

The ability to subordinate people’s health and longevity is rooted in a patriarchal tradition of privilege that allows a predominantly male-led industry to assert control over the life of communities, while ignoring the costs of irresponsible agricultural and food practices on people, especially women and children. What an utter heaping pile of horse shit.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:54 PM
26

Wait a minute now. Buzzfeed is saying "you're going to want to fuck these teachers" but then if you did, they would turn right around and say "look at these rapist teachers!" Fuck that website. I hope it dies in a fire.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 04:42 PM
1

We could...but should we? No, no we shouldn't.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 03:21 PM
7

Arrested for the second time....
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:16 PM
2

I would say it becomes abuse when, in her own words, she had been doing it systematically over 12 years.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:32 PM
17

Is she a terrible person? Absolutely. Will she be punished accordingly? We will see. THAT is why I will withhold my outrage. Thousands of people are murdered every day. I'm not outraged about that because they get punished. The people that DON"T get punished deserve my outrage.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 04:47 PM
11

I'll hold my outrage until the trial verdict and sentencing comes through.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 03:08 PM
42

Fuck her. Should have responded with "girls should get circumcised too, better not descriminate."
/r/MensRights06/08/15 05:04 PM
1

I think that is a lot of it. Where else can a man go when he needs to vent about his issues? Where else can he go to talk about his problems without being told to man up? Sometimes that's all we need, is to vent to a group that we know 'gets it'
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:23 PM
120

How it is sexist to prevent both men AND women from wearing shorts? Isn't that the definition of equal treatment? Isn't that what they want?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 06:14 PM
107

It's kind of silly we have to have a bill to ensure that due process is followed. Get the schools out of the business of policing, and let the police do it.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:55 PM
12

Thus is the plight of men in a feminist controlled society, damned if you do, damned if you don't.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 01:09 PM
5

Is that really a victory for women? No, it most definitely is not. It is a victory for Feminists, sure. But it is a huge loss for EVERY OTHER PERSON EVER IN NEED of a rescue ever again.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:33 PM
46

Imagine if ANY percent of female rape victims were threatened with arrest....
/r/MensRights23/07/15 12:12 PM
4

Check out these wonderful sources that counter your claim. Not saying it's wrong, just saying the stats are more merky murky than you would claim.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:16 PM
1

people in this thread are trying to discourage you very hard. You're damn right. Changing the minds of people has to start somewhere, with someone. I don't personally have anything to contribute to the OPs cause, but I'm CERTAINLY not to going to dissuade him from trying.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 06:08 PM
6

I dont understand how it is legal to charge a different amount for the same thing to different people. Oh you have a penis and want a shot? $5 please! Oh you have a vagina and want a shot? $4 please! This doesn't make any fucking sense.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 06:18 PM
7

Thank you for so eloquently saying what's in my head about this topic.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 11:29 PM
11

And this is probably the side of their argument that they haven't even thought of. If it is valid to vote for someone because vagina, then it also valid to NOT for someone because vagina.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 07:28 PM
28

Wait wait wait, how can "different treatment" EVER mean equality. By the very basic definition, it cannot ever be equal. The logic hoops that they have to jump through here are outstanding.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 04:17 PM
19

The crux of the matter is that (some) feminists believe that mens opinions do matter less, precisely because they are men. If a man is against feminism it's because he is sexist (in the eyes of a feminist). But if a woman is against feminism, it's not so easy to write off as sexism. So yes, sometimes a woman denouncing feminism has more weight than a man denouncing it. Just my two cents.
/r/MensRights26/03/15 03:37 PM
88

That appears to be the sad truth. No one cares until a woman is affected.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 04:27 PM
3

Obligatory r/pussypass
/r/MensRights28/12/14 03:44 AM
3

Why not just link to the ACTUAL article? The Vanishing Male Worker: How America Fell Behind
/r/MensRights15/12/14 08:01 PM
12

This is just another reason I won't be donating to the Salvation Army bell ringers this year.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 07:36 PM
18

A 15 year old boy can't stay with women, because he would make them feel uncomfortable (unsafe) while they are in their pajamas, making him a potential sexual predator. But he also can't stay with men because he is young enough to be a target for sexual predators? WHAT!?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 03:06 PM
1

You must be confused, I'm not OP.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 01:28 PM
127

So because she abused her position as a nurse to forge medical documents, she will lose her nursing license...right? Of course not.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:08 PM
3

Just to point out a simple fact that everyone seems to be missing, fraternities AND sororities are being affected. So it's not just the mens groups, it's the womens groups as well. "University spokesman Anthony P. de Bruyn told CNN in an email Saturday that Sullivan's order affected about 3,500 students in 31 fraternities, 16 sororities, seven multicultural Greek Council fraternities and sororities and eight Pan-Hellenic Council fraternities and sororities"
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:30 AM
32

That won't stop people complaining about the rapist menz
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:09 AM
2

Probably downvoting because Because false aligation are in the minority a. You can't possible prove that b. They still happen, regardless of it's the minority, it needs to be punished.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 04:32 AM
6

Unfortunately, this was the exact same argument I had to make against a nurse, A NURSE, who said because she had to clean old men's discusting foreskin that cannot do it themselves, every one should have it cut....WTF, a nurse....ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:35 AM
9

7 years for torture? 7 years?! For Torture? Regardless of the fact that two women did this to a boy, 7 years? That's it?
/r/MensRights17/10/14 05:13 AM
1

Sadly, I have to agree.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 02:14 PM
8

Fucking christ jesus. It's now a mans fault that you don't buy pants with pockets? And two pages dedicated to this non-sense?
/r/MensRights02/10/14 05:07 PM
7

Why not a criminal case for rape? Oh wait, women can't rape. /s
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:08 PM
9

The point he is trying to make in the headline is that the 16 year old girl and her boyfriend tried to rob this guy. SHE shot the guy, and they are showing her boyfriends face and name, and withholding hers.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 04:51 PM
3

This is fiction.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 07:04 PM
6

From the first line of the article: When it comes to family planning, the burden too often falls solely on women. Rediculous. This is such an outrageous claim. The BURDEN of family planning lies soley on women!? Come on.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:09 PM
19

Why can't the man get the "councelling he needs to be dedicated father who puts the needs of his children first" as the judge said? Because men don't matter, fathers don't matter. This is a disgrace. Just another reason to never be a father, no one thinks you matter anyway.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 03:15 PM
1

Why not test out your theory? Go to /r/femenism and say you are a femenist trying to learn more about mens rights...of course you should do this under an alternate account, because you will likely get banned.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:21 PM
–

I think the problem is there are so many wide varieties of what people consider to be femenism. As such, declaring one self to be a femenists that focuses on mens only issues will likely result in the majority of femenists trying to 're-brand' that person into an MRA instead. No evidence to support this, just a thought really.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:12 PM
3

Because everyone knows that only men commit sexual asssaut..... /s
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:48 PM
1

But I think that is what the article is getting at, maybe men are better with abstract and spatial reasoning, in part, due to the societal expectation of men to be better at those. But I agree, I definitely think brain structure plays a part.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 10:36 PM
2

Here are the words I was looking for Whatever the reason, this study indicates that cognitive differences between men and women are not solely inherited. It suggests that, to a degree hitherto unacknowledged, they are learned from the roles a society expects males and females to perform, and that those differences can change as society changes. Modern times require modern thinking. EDIT: I think, however, that gender stereotypes are the reason for the social development differences. If girls are…
/r/MensRights13/08/14 04:11 PM
1

It's really nice to see the numbers broken down by age range/part-time/full-time. I don't understand how anyone can interpret cold hard data in any other way. It's not like we are reading a poem and trying to figure out what the author meant, they are numbers.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:59 PM
115

‘Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them.’ Um.....what?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:55 PM
46

I'm inclined to mostly agree with you. Men and Women share equal intelligence. A man can be smarter than a woman, and a woman can be smarter than a man. But as a whole (I have no stats to back this up) I believe we are all of relatively equal intelligence.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 06:25 PM
13

It doesn't fucking matter if he asked for it. She is the adult, she needs to say no.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 03:38 PM
17

This just boggles my mind. If both parties are drunk, and one is guilty of sexual assault, how is the other ALSO not guilty of sexual asssault? Now when a person says multiple times that they want to have sex, that isn't enough. Do we need to get it in writing, have a professional handwriting analysis done to confirm that is actual their signature? Where does this rediculousness end?
/r/MensRights31/07/14 04:48 PM
14

I read something yesterday that I feel is relevant, and you'll have to forgive me because I don't have the link handy. It was from a comment of another reddit user. I'll paraphrase. "Feminists hate men. But MRAs hate feminism, not the women themsevles." It is okay to hate the ideals/idea, but it not okay to hate the person. I think if feminists understood this simple concept, then femenism and MRAs would truly have a common goal, equality. Try to fix the IDEALS that cause the issues, rather than…
/r/MensRights29/07/14 05:33 PM
3

I couldn't read any more than that, who comes up with this stuff?
/r/MensRights04/02/14 01:00 PM
4

What does atheism have to do with anything that is being discussed?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:20 PM
9

Thank you for sharing this story, sincerely.
/r/MensRights01/06/12 06:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter