| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | We should be trying to spread the story of the Canadian court who found the female pedophile non-dangerous.You are a sick individual. | /r/MensRights | 30/10/18 04:38 AM |
| 1 | We should be trying to spread the story of the Canadian court who found the female pedophile non-dangerous.The toddler isn't necessarily harmed Seek help buddy | /r/MensRights | 30/10/18 02:22 AM |
| 5 | We should be trying to spread the story of the Canadian court who found the female pedophile non-dangerous.That's sickening, what the fuck is up with their sentencing for pedophiles? edit : R. v. Van Den Boogaard 6 months in jail for tying up 11 and 13 year olds to a bed and molesting one of them? Do they not know what kind of trauma that causes a kid when they are younger? And how it fucks up their entire life R. v. .P.S. Molests a 8 year old girl, only 3 months??? WTF | /r/MensRights | 28/10/18 12:53 AM |
| 5 | We should be trying to spread the story of the Canadian court who found the female pedophile non-dangerous.At least she got a decent sentence, 6 years in prison is acceptable for this crime in my eyes. Performing fellatio on a toddler's penis, and having over 25,000 CP images, and you think 6 years is acceptable? What the hell is wrong with you dude? It's time to repent after that comment | /r/MensRights | 28/10/18 12:25 AM |
| 41 | 50 Cent, right on spot about the Me Too movementI got banned from there for not even posting there. | /r/MensRights | 26/10/18 11:47 PM |
| 73 | 50 Cent, right on spot about the Me Too movementYou have been banned from /r/TwoXChromosomes | /r/MensRights | 26/10/18 11:23 PM |
| 7 | Using her baby's life to earn money (She already deleted the second tweet)What in the fuck.. | /r/MensRights | 20/10/18 09:13 PM |
| 2 | Double StandardsI totally understand and agree, I was mostly referring to /u/jwinf843's post above putting him down. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 04:51 PM |
| 2 | Double StandardsConsidering how many people that call themselves "curvy" or "chubby" or "thick" and are actually just obese it makes it a safe bet. It's a safe bet, but it's also a negative assumption to make about people imo. Unless they said 6'3, 350+ lbs or something then yeah. But I usually give people the benefit of the doubt, as should you! | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 04:38 PM |
| 2 | Double StandardsAnd ya it is fairly rare No it isn't, unless you like to make up assumptions about people and think they are obese just because of their weight. When you don't even take into account their height and possible muscular tone. I see this everywhere on online forums too. Someone says their height and weight, and they get instantly put down. It's quite sad really | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 04:13 PM |
| 5 | Double Standards"no one is obese because super athletes are 300+lbs and not obese!". I don't think you understand how height affects weight. Albert isn't the only person who is 6'3 and around 240 that is not obese... This is not abnormal or "rare". | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 04:02 PM |
| 7 | Double StandardsNot be a hater but 245lbs at 6'3 is actually in the obese range. No it isn't.. Albert Pujols is around that size and not obese whatsoever. | /r/MensRights | 14/10/18 11:53 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter