| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | Why should men be sex positive?I love the red pill conception of "basic biology." Basic biology is Punnett squares and osmosis. It's not "all men in all cultures hate sluts." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/01/16 03:06 PM |
| 18 | Why should men be sex positive?Men are revolted by promiscuous females who won't sleep with them Fixed that for you. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 20/01/16 02:56 PM |
| 3 | BP: If TRP didn't have AWALT or generalizations, would you be more accepting of it?Why do you think my comment implies that I don't believe in promiscuous women? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/16 03:24 AM |
| 4 | BP: If TRP didn't have AWALT or generalizations, would you be more accepting of it?The idea that TRP makes scientific claims is just laughable. "We are scientific. We are logical. We deal in facts" is repeated by TRP like a mantra. Repeating it over and over doesn't make it true. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/16 03:12 AM |
| 1 | BP: If TRP didn't have AWALT or generalizations, would you be more accepting of it?It would be just as wrong, but at least it would be wrong on a smaller scale. My answer is still "no." | /r/PurplePillDebate | 19/01/16 03:06 AM |
| 11 | Blue pill is never going to understand red pill because blue pill refuses to believe that TRP is a new thing.Someone a lot smarter than you wrote the following statement a very long time ago: What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/01/16 11:14 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter