TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iSanddbox Archive

View 0 posts and 86 comments by iSanddbox on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Exactly. For me it's happened a lot with their ridiculous mis-characterization of the Citizens United decision.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 07:37 AM
-1

Right, but the consequences aren't realistic.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 10:32 PM
3

I'm still trying to figure out if you're a troll or not.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:23 PM
6

Agreed. While I don't think parents should be afraid to be naked around their children, what's weird is that rather than do it for her kids' benefit, she's doing it for hypothetical future insecure women, as well as for her own body issues. And you made a great point about her assuming their heterosexuality as well (and statistically the chance of one of them being gay is quite high considering that the more older brothers you have, the greater your chance is of being gay).
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:22 PM
-5

There's no realistic concern of your husband ending up on a sex offender list. Even if there were, that would mean that the problem is in shitty laws and not in the nudity itself.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 07:18 PM
12

I wouldn't let my daughters see their dad shower or change underwear and I wouldn't do it if I had sons. Why? Too many kids grow up without any idea of what the naked body looks like until they start watching porn or whatever. There's nothing wrong with parents being naked around their young kids. Once they start wanting privacy you should obviously stop doing it, but beyond that it's perfectly fine. I'm assuming you're American, so I'd like to point out that most other countries have much more …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:05 PM
7

Wow, I absolutely disagree. It sounds like you sexualize any display of nudity whatsoever.
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:02 PM
10

Let's be honest, her ideas wouldn't be accepted by anyone outside the most radical of feminists.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 09:03 PM
9

Dude...
/r/MensRights27/07/14 07:06 PM
16

Dude, she took a poster from somebody. She didn't try to fucking murder them.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:29 PM
2

Uhh...
/r/MensRights27/07/14 06:26 PM
9

Oh, shit, an Endorsed Contributor! I'm sorry, I should have seen the wedding ring.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:31 AM
10

Clearly I haven't been getting enough omega-3s in my diet. Why did you reply to my comment? Can't you see the wedding ring?
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:18 AM
7

You might be surprised to find out he wasn't talking about your taste in food.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 10:06 AM
1

He doesn't need money to leave a relationship.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 09:36 PM
-1

Nothing short of a kickstarter miracle What the fuck? Are you asking people to give you money so you can leave an abusive environment?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 08:37 PM
2

In some small tournaments, not all of eSports.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 01:52 AM
3

Except how do females compare to amateur males? They're still terrible. I played one of the few "pro" females in several tournaments and it was basically a free round every time. I guess it depends what you mean by amateur, though. So why do females need their own tournaments simply because they cannot compete with the top players Many would argue they don't, just as people would argue that region-locked tournaments to give foreigners a chance shouldn't have happened. I will say that it's easy t…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:45 AM
1

Would a rose by any other name be any less sweet? You used that quote completely incorrectly. It's actually embarrassing to read. As Shakespeare would say, "thou hath made a fool of thyself".
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:38 AM
1

The key difference isn't biological or cognitive, it's cultural.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:38 AM
4

I used to play Starcraft 2 at a semi-pro level, so I'll bite. In gaming men are, as we all know, the dominant majority by FAR. That alone makes it very hard for women to succeed, not to mention obviously it's a lot less culturally acceptable for women to play videogames. A female-only tournament is just a way to allow female gamers who would get wrecked in tournaments a way to compete. Having a men-only tournament is just weird to me, why would you want that? It's the gaming equivalent of having…
/r/MensRights04/07/14 08:37 AM
0

Sometimes this subreddit is so embarassing.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 04:08 PM
-5

How can you say something like that and not feel like a moron?
/r/MensRights02/07/14 03:54 AM
1

Boys showed significantly more joy and anger, more positive vocalizations, fussiness, and crying, more gestural signals directed towards the mother, and more escape behaviors than girls. Girls were significantly more likely to show interest, to gaze at objects, and to use self-regulatory behaviors such as diverting their attention to objects and to thumbsuck than boys. Several of these sex differences were stable over time and none could be accounted for in terms of maternal behavior and affect …
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:04 AM
1

"Identify character traits of rapists"? How exactly would that protect them when pretty much anybody has the ability to rape them? What, do they just run away from any black guy they see or something? There are some common sense things anybody can do to minimize any kind of crime, and by extension rape. But don't pretend that you can know every rapist beforehand, especially when it's something like date rape.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:00 AM
1

A girl will generally begin to explore independent of her mother much earlier than a boy, who feels a strong need to stay close [citation needed]
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:54 AM
1

For that joke to have worked it would have had to be "brazillianth".
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:55 PM
2

I don't think it's about men supporting equality and women not supporting it. Men are currently affected by the draft, whereas women aren't. So equality benefits men and hurts women in this case. Consider how many men were against women voting compared to how many women were against women voting - it's always the side that benefits from equality that will fight for that equality.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:54 PM
1

You summed it up perfectly. And I agree about demonizing women.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:01 AM
13

For the record "DAE" implies you're saying something circlejerky/sarcastic.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 02:26 AM
3

Comments like this only make the subreddit look like a giant circlejerk.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:40 PM
1

I know some girls who get terrible cramps and some who get none at all. It's not disabling for everybody. I think feminists tend to be senstive about the issue because it used to be a common excuse for why women weren't suited for labor.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:07 PM
6

I don't agree at all. If the kid doesn't have a problem with it what's wrong with calling him pretty?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 08:20 AM
10

Honestly that sounds like any politician ever.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:16 PM
1

But we're basically discussing gender roles, not sex. I understand the difference between the two.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 05:50 PM
1

Doesn't gender seem more relevant?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:14 AM
1

This is a pretty classic correlation vs causation case, though.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 08:12 AM
1

Wait, what the fuck?
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:54 PM
4

Or in the Duke case, Jesse Jackson.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 03:52 PM
0

Society. It's very circular, but there it is.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 06:22 AM
2

Why? A guy grabbed his dick. Nothing else happened. Besides, how would they find the guy anyway?
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:28 AM
3

In the case of Steubenville, there was insufficient evidence to convict, if I recall correctly "The Steubenville High School rape occurred in Steubenville, Ohio, on the night of August 11, 2012, when a high school girl, incapacitated by alcohol, was publicly and repeatedly sexually assaulted by her peers, several of whom documented the acts in social media. The victim was transported, undressed, photographed, and sexually assaulted. She was also penetrated vaginally by other students' fingers (d…
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:25 AM
1

Right, I should have specified which narrative they're trying to present. With the exception of the "privileged white male" narrative, having a drop of black blood makes you black.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:50 AM
2

To be fair there's nothing wrong with the word "intellectual", but I would reserve that word for the Chomskys and not the Coopers.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:02 PM
1

Right, I think you misinterpreted the parent comment. They were saying the article itself was racist.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 11:00 PM
2

Don't feel privileged. That's because you forgot to check your privilege.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:57 PM
5

Gender/Race studies have by far the lowest quality students and professors, which shouldn't be surprising since "studying" gender basically means "regurgitating the fashionable ideology". Every time someone has even a drop of white blood in them they're now the Evil Privileged White Male - the parallels with the whole Zimmerman narrative are obvious.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 10:56 PM
2

You took the trollbait.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 06:19 AM
0

Exactly, this is clearly a fake or highly exaggerated story.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 04:14 AM
1

They've already gotten millions of dollars from Duke University IIRC. Trust me, they're not hurting for money.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 09:20 PM
1

I saw the green, I was just wondering if it's a sure thing.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 09:59 PM
1

I kind of doubt I am since I got a reply a few minutes ago. How do you know?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 08:15 PM
1

I still don't even know what the word means!
/r/MensRights14/05/14 07:37 PM
1

It's working within the realms of patriarchy to even suggest that people need to die. What? In your feminist utopia, there would be no death? I haven't been reading those philosophers.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 06:34 AM
3

That is discrimination.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 05:32 PM
3

Ideally it would, but when most people use that word they're referring to a man. Dictionaries reflect how people actually use language, not what the word should mean.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 11:23 PM
2

Seriously, there's a clear difference from being pressured into sex and actually being raped.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:49 AM
2

This subreddit is very rabid and easily swayed into hive-mind thinking, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:44 PM
2

Ah, I totally misinterpreted that.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 10:38 PM
1

The dad very frequently refers to him with male gender pronouns. That being said I think this is an issue of police negligence, not a gender issue.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:51 AM
2

I'm actually baffled that you were downvoted. They have evidence of past abuse and an admission from the mother, at the crime scene, at having "kicked [the boy] wrong", inadvertently killing him. There is no way she would ever walk free.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:50 AM
2

Different situations. In the background they clearly heard extreme verbal abuse and possible evidence of physical abuse. In your call they probably heard a baby playing around.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 05:48 AM
4

An apologist for people who fuck children. Have we not been over this?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 07:30 AM
7

I think you're looking for /r/fathersrights. There's 31 other exciting subscribers to share your hostility with! You've made apologies for pedos Uh, what?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:59 AM
8

What the fuck are you talking about with "pedo rights"? What does that even mean? When have I advocated anything remotely related to that? I said that calling pedophiles child rapists is wrong, which is from any sane perspective a very clear-cut fact. Now you're trying to read into it and trying to distort it as child rape apologism or something.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:39 AM
-5

While I agree with your comparisons, using "chinks" and "fags" isn't a fair comparison. It's not like the original poster said "I don't think this fucking useless piece of shit gender should be allowed to sit next to children" or whatever.
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:27 AM
5

First of all that's simply because 2 recent threads have dealt with the issue. If you actually check my post history it's pretty clear I'm not some secret pedo activist or whatever you're trying to imply. Decent men who want their rights as fathers back or for those rights to even exist before they start a family don't want to see you or your "empathy" on MRA threads. Don't be disingenuous; that's your opinion, not the opinion of "decent men". And I already addressed the seating issue in this th…
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:24 AM
12

I can only conclude that you are some feminist shill working to associate a movement working for father's rights with pedophiles or are a pedophile yourself hitching onto a movement. ...What? And "feminist shill"? That's ridiculous rhetoric. I'm simply stating what needs to be stated, which is that there is a difference between people who are attracted to children yet don't act out their desires, and people who are attracted to children yet do. The first category is much greater than the second …
/r/MensRights03/05/14 03:13 AM
10

This is exactly what I mean. Feminists say the exact same thing, except the other way around. Why are you any better?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 01:13 AM
44

There's something uncomfortable about it, like they're so wrapped up in the ideology that they're scrawling it on bathroom stalls. It's not much different than crazy feminists; the more you associate your identity with a belief set, the more close-minded you'll tend to be as a result. The frequent dichotomy of "men vs women" that you see on both sides is a pretty clear example.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 09:58 PM
4

Yeah, that's very true. I didn't elaborate on that point since I was writing that comment on my phone, but obviously not every person who rapes and/or abuses a child does it for sexual pleasure. It's safe to say that the vast majority do, though. The bottom line is that pedophiles are just people unfortunate enough to be born with a sexual orientation that doesn't have a clear outlet, and being demonized by society just compounds that.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 09:53 PM
12

Fuck that shit, not everybody hates children. Plus I'd rather have a small child than a huge fat person or something. All of which is besides the point since you're just trying to rationalize an unequal situation.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:18 PM
26

Of course not...what's your point? The vast majority of pedophiles are just extremely unlucky people who would never abuse a child. When "pedophile" and "child abuser" are practically synonymous, it makes it more difficult for pedophiles to get help so that they don't do anything wrong.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:30 PM
115

The collective noun for people who sexually abuse children isn't "men", it's "paedophiles". According to the Lucy Faithful Foundation, around 20% of child sex offenders are female, so assuming all men are a risk and all women are safe is not an effective way for any business to screen for child abusers. This part made me sad; pedophile refers to attraction to children. A child abuser is a pedophile but a pedophile is not a child abuser.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 06:06 PM
2

It's not that social science studies can't follow the scientific method, it's that they often don't.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 11:23 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:13 AM
3

. I am just a spoiled kid haha no, solo eres un mentiroso y una idiota jesucristo, ya sabes que nadie te cree, verdad? asi que por que tienes que mentir tanto?
/r/seduction30/04/14 03:41 AM
2

The whole "Doubleplusgood" thing is just supposed to reference the way the government controlled language. "DoubleThink" was the way Winston had to say something while believing another. Doublespeak comes from the same area. It's also the story of Big Brother. The ending does have some interesting concepts. I urge you to read it. Of the classics it's not exactly animal farm in terms of brevity and comprehension but it's Animal Farm has a lot more allegory whereas 1984 is pretty straightforward F…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 04:47 PM
2

I say stuff like "no homo" all the time in a joking manner. And by the way, your conception of college students is almost certainly wrong if you think only "13-year-old idiots" say things like "that's so gay".
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:56 PM
7

But wait, there's more! One of the teachers gave the falsely accused students F's in her classes for no reason, then raised that grade to a D after they complained until finally they filed a lawsuit and their grade was increased to "a pass".
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:44 PM
2

Kind of, although at least going off the Wikipedia article people were pushing for the draft even for people that couldn't vote: This was joined by prominent feminists and suffragettes of the time, such as Emmeline Pankhurst and her daughter Christabel. They, in addition to handing out the feathers, also lobbied to institute an involuntary draft of men, including those who lacked votes due to being too young or not owning property.[3][4][5] That being said the OP claiming that it was just femini…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:12 AM
0

Apartheid was complete segregation, you even had black hospitals and white hospitals, and that was only a tiny part of it. Men suffer no where near the same level of persecution and you're delusional if you think so.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 04:43 AM
0

Hey, I know this thread is really old but I just wanted to point out that this comment is completely wrong.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 08:56 AM
3

and make fun of people who work out. rofl, what? did somebody say ugly mug?
/r/askTRP22/02/14 03:14 AM
1

...Wow. So alpha, Jim.
/r/askTRP22/02/14 12:10 AM
1

Even more hilariously, what she said about artificial sugar is completely false, it does not have the same effect on the body as sugar.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 04:30 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter