TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

i_h8_yellow_mustard Archive

View 0 posts and 27 comments by i_h8_yellow_mustard on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

They literally just hate men. Most people in the west have some sort of misandry baked into how they see the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 02:08 PM
5

Everything that cretins like Andrew Tate say that people complain about really aren't much worse than the average woman's opinion on men and broader sexual strategy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/25 11:15 AM
14

and in addition you can't help but feel there is some significant schadenfreude being felt by women who see the suffering of men at a meta level as some sort of payback for centuries of oppression of men. This is just plain and simple evil. How exactly is a man born in 2000 responsible for the actions of men who died years before he was born?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/25 02:55 PM
47

There is not a single thing that a feminist hates more than women being treated the same as men. It's fundamentally about maintaining the privileges that come with being a woman in the west, and adding onto that the privilege that "men" experience (most of which hasn't existed in decades or only applies to the wealthy).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/05/25 05:15 PM
2

I understand how you feel. Do what you can to not dwell on it, it very easily pulls you down into a really dark place. I would know as well as anyone. Wishing you the best. Also try not to take the words of a French philosopher to heart when it's anything about sexuality, even worse adolescent sexuality. Even if they have value to add to the discussion the French get really fucking weird about this shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 01:07 PM
7

You're allowed to feel this, don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Emotions are natural. I think redditors are brainrotted and assume any sort of longing for romantic connection is incel stuff. It's not worth absorbing what they say.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/25 12:29 PM
17

If that was the case, men who have solid bonds with friends wouldn't feel this way. I think that the "friends" part of the issue is massively overstated and used as an excuse to handwave away this issue because it's very uncomfortable for people to even acknowledge this issue exists in the first place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/25 02:53 PM
19

You literally said: I think that men are more lonelier than women because men don't value their male friendships . Which is it? Are men more lonely because they don't connect with friends or are they lonely because, contrary to popular belief, companionship and sex are needs and men are not getting these needs met?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/25 02:48 PM
33

I think that men are more lonelier than women because men don't value their male friendships . This shit is so patronizing lol. Yeah, I have great friends but that doesn't take away the intense longing for romantic companionship that I've been stuck with and suffering as a result of for my entire adolesence and adulthood. At some point you all are gonna have to accept that these things are needs and not "nice to have"s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/25 02:44 PM
12

Because there's no social force that exists to counteract anti-male sexism like there is with misogyny. Outside of the internet and specific social circles, being misogynistic is at least mildly taboo. Hating on men? That's just another Tuesday. It's the same way with any sort of bigotry really. Unless you have an active social force that suppresses or counteracts something like racism, you'd have a resurgence of the KKK. People need to hold all other people accountable for shit behavior. Unfort…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/02/25 07:18 PM
2

Because women argue against it. People don't tend to cite things that contradict their points.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/24 03:38 PM
2

No.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/12/24 03:43 PM
26

Correction - they have negative protection since MGM is explicitly protected by law and promoted by the medical industry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/12/24 07:09 PM
1

But the solution presented by yall seems to be that women should just accept men only wanting sex from them and nothing else. Don't include me in "y'all" considering I have zero desire for sex without there being an emotional connection and an exclusive relationship. In fact, I'd put a paycheck on the majority of men who struggle with dating (or don't even try for whatever reason) to be similar in that regard. Most men who only want casual hookups are doing just fine getting what they want out o…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 01:14 PM
1

What's wrong with desiring intimacy? Nothing is wrong with it, they just hate men who don't immediately have the ability to understand how to have that need fulfilled. If you don't fill out the requirements that are usually a result of your upbringing in childhood, they want you to suffer alone and quietly. It's hilarious to me how people don't see how that is a pathway to South Korea-esque social decay. It's not just relationships where this will create issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/24 12:11 PM
4

patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 10:53 AM
1

What you actually said was that it is "politically correct eugenics. Read the entire comment please. So does cold approaching. Cold approaching is not the only form of approaching. Great, then women will continue to call them out and the whiners on this sub will continue to cry about it. My eyes cannot roll any further without exiting my skull.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 10:50 AM
1

Sorry, you're now claiming you didn't call it "politically correct eugenics?" Once again you're gleaming what you want it to say and not what it actually said. I was referring to your ridiculous "women refusing to do so" statement. Women refusing to go on dates/whatever isn't eugenics, but telling men to not use their only avenue of getting into relationships if they do not fall into an exceptional category is. You're, in a nicely dressed up way, telling men that they need to remain alone unless…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/24 10:19 AM
1

Looking at the majority of men today who have no education, dead end jobs, and live at home, A lot of this also applies to women. Men have less education because education has been made far more for women. This applies to grade school and college. Good to see people admitting that it's about what men materially provide. I appreciate the honesty. In today’s day and age, it is not uncommon for anyone regardless of gender to not have sex until they’re older than previous generations. Not as much as…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 06:27 PM
1

Saying "well I'm not actually red pill" doesn't invalidate criticism of your argument that is clearly rooted in red pill ideology. I don't adopt a pill because all of them get shit wrong far more often than right. All of them, including whichever one you adopt. Actually you did and even went so far as to call women refusing to do so "eugenics." No, you read my comment with a conclusion in mind and went with that instead of what I actually said. I said that setting a precedent where men should no…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 06:20 PM
1

Nope, that's red pill brain rot. Good thing I'm not a redpiller. Women are not required to facilitate men's desire for intimacy, regardless of attractiveness. Good thing I didn't say so. Hahahahahahahahaha no it isn't and it is so fucking cringey that you would even make that comparison If men shouldn't approach, what should they do to get into relationships? You need to answer this question, otherwise my description is completely accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 05:50 PM
1

It’s interesting that you see women and sex as something to access rather than as people who may decide to enter a relationship with you. I'm discussing this in a "clinical" way since the situation calls for it. Obviously I don't see sex and relationships as a commodity. Also nice try with the "see women as..." part. Be more subtle. I’m not sure why you’re acting like women weren’t forced into marriages with men significantly older than them for the purpose of bearing children. Yes, that happene…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 05:47 PM
1

I agree, I was just pointing out the parallel irony of this in relation to women not being able to have agency in how they expressed themselves sexually up to just a few decades ago. Except this is a false equivalency at best and intellectual dishonesty at worst. The average woman has at no point in history been unable to access relationships and/or sex. That is now a social problem that men, and only men, face. The table hasn't turned, it's an entirely different table.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 03:25 PM
1

That's not how that works. Taking revenge on someone alive now because someone in the past has done something bad just because they share a trait (one they didn't choose and one they have a 50% chance of getting at random) is sociopathic.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 03:16 PM
1

How is "women want to be able to exist without someone trying to hit on them" putting down men's sexuality? Because this is, in a roundabout way, saying that men should accept being alone and sexless unless they're in the top ranks of attractiveness where women approach them. It's politically correct eugenics. As a man, approaching women is how you get into relationships or have sex at all. If you don't, you're not getting anywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 03:04 PM
4

I absolutely agree the emphasis of sex as the measure of a man’s success needs to stop. The patriarchy is toxic for everyone, especially men. Women's behavior is not the fault of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 02:54 PM
2

You live within a society. You already pay for things other people use or do, and other people you. Accept it or unironically return to monke.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/24 01:55 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter