TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

i_reckon_not Archive

View 0 posts and 82 comments by i_reckon_not on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Frustratingly, every time I've seen somebody ask this question in a discussion on this topic, the response is nearly always a vague reference to a masculine inclination to greater violence, or simply outright "toxic masculinity". Even the old chestnut about women choosing less violent methods in order to leave a beautiful corpse because of society's oppressive beauty standards doesn't get the play that it used to even just a few years back.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:35 AM
3

I personally believe that while the majority of suicide attempts are by women I wonder how you arrived at that belief? Interestingly, when I went looking for data on this (since "women attempt more" is always trotted out as a statement of pure fact when this topic is discussed), I couldn't find any. Not that I just couldn't find data to support the particular hypothesis, I couldn't find serious data on suicide attempts as a unique phenomenon at all. Every study that I could find that was cited t…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:31 AM
5

Remember, feminism don't want equality, they want women to be the privileged sex. I think it's Martin van Creveld in his book called (ironically enough) 'The Privileged Sex' who goes into what has happened historically when serious experiments were conducted in the creation of substantive, on-the-ground gender equality in the early Soviet Union and kibbutzim in early modern Israel (and one or two other examples I think). IIRC, basically attempts were made to do away with the traditional division…
/r/MensRights13/11/18 04:22 AM
4

“Dr. Pearce testified that the current research suggests that women do not suffer from paraphilic disorders apart from masochism lol I would love to see that current research
/r/MensRights09/11/18 06:35 AM
39

They will just say that those are not real feminists Ehhh, I dunno about that. Back when I considered myself a feminist and ran in feminist circles, this approach as counter argument really didn't come out very much with anybody I knew (nor with many feminists I've interacted with in the years since I moved away from it). It's too obvious and ineffective. The smell of hypocrisy is simply too strong even for your average feminist to believe that anybody will swallow it. What you do get in my expe…
/r/MensRights09/11/18 05:48 AM
3

Agreed. And disentangling ourselves from these notions of male expendability, including and especially in these kinds of situations, is IMO a requirement for getting anywhere close to real world gender equality.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 04:20 AM
11

but its STILL a mens issue This is really the crux, but isn't it interesting how these conversations nearly always go down the same well-trodden path? The moment anybody mentions that women have some or (heaven forbid) the majority of the responsibility for some social ill because of their position in society, immediately the debate turns to just how much responsibility men have and, implicitly, how far we can and should tacitly excuse women. Then inevitably we're right back onto the same tired …
/r/MensRights09/11/18 02:56 AM
3

Yeah, these campaigns have always been about funneling money into feminist "awareness" organisations in order to raise the social status of the largely upper class people who create and run them, not about actually doing something about the problem. If they were serious about that, they'd be pushing massively redistributive fiscal policy to flatten out wealth inequality, as the greatest predictor of family violence is poverty and financial stress. But of course they don't, because most of the po…
/r/MensRights02/11/18 09:09 AM
7

At this point you probably just need to be vigilant about what policies are actually going to be proposed moving forward. A lot of big companies make noise about this sort of thing so they can put together a nice press release or otherwise give their marketing people something fashionable to shill the company with, but little actually changes in the day-to-day operation (at some point the activists who love this shit are going to catch on, but they haven't yet in a way that's hit the mainstream)…
/r/MensRights30/10/18 03:32 AM
5

Not forgetting that "The Father of the Men's Rights Movement", Ernest Belfort Bax, was an actual Marxist (if a Kautskyite, but nobody's perfect).
/r/MensRights30/10/18 02:32 AM
65

It's also the "dungeons and dragons causes satanism and suicide" for porn.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:25 AM
11

The "old boys club" as a notion was never primarily about the sex of the people involved - except in as far as the concept came into the culture at a time when it was more common for female gender roles to be respected (and enforced) and so the people in these positions did tend to be men. It was always an expression to describe class advantage - where people in the upper classes all had social and familial connections and tended to look after each others' interests. So inside tips on investment…
/r/MensRights19/10/18 03:25 AM
27

It's not just how they say it, it's what they actually do with the power to make changes when they get it - like this. It's always stuff that just happens to mostly or exclusively benefit already powerful and extremely comfortable (mostly white) women. But it's somehow "symbolic" and there are apparently enough people out there in the community - or at least enough of the people in the community that actually have enough money and status to matter - that eat this shit up. You want to get serious…
/r/MensRights11/10/18 12:34 PM
1

It doesn't even have to be a conscious conspiracy by spooky billionaires to deliberately suppress class struggle. Feminism has been an ideological plaything for bored bourgeois princesses since the 19th century. Aside from a very brief period from the Russian revolution and into the interwar period where the likes of Goldman and Luxembourg were active, it has always been a movemet by and for the already wealthy and privileged and remains so today.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 09:29 AM
1

There is probably an element of realpolitik in play when it comes to activism and advocacy for the homeless and who you showcase when you want to elicit empathy and sympathy. If you want to make real progress on it - be it via lobbying the government, trying to raise community awareness in order to shore up support for this or that measure when it comes time to vote or by directly appealing for charity - you have to find a person or group of people who the punters will care about and feel compel…
/r/MensRights09/10/18 07:38 AM
3

Many of us were feminists ourselves for years and have met and worked with plenty, "good" and "bad."
/r/MensRights09/10/18 03:07 AM
2

Doctor Pulaski... I was honestly so disappointed that she turned out to just be a temp filling in for Crusher during the second season. I know the character was more or less just a female Bones McCoy but she was just so much fun and her evolving interactions with Data especially were really the highlight of that whole season. I found Crusher's moral grandstanding always felt forced, her whole uber-nurterer persona where she played mother to the whole crew as well her son to be a bit on the nose …
/r/MensRights09/10/18 03:04 AM
3

men don't understand While I think there are certainly areas where the sexes don't always understand the experiences of their counterparts, this is becoming a little silly at this point. Constant cries of "You just don't understand!" even when every effort has been made for a long time, even including government mandated programs in primary schools, even when there have been demonstrable political efforts to address the sorts of things being complained about for decades. Honestly, this refrain i…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 08:47 AM
3

It is a unique perspective, but I do also question the usefulness of that perspective in these discussions. My position in LGBT organizations over the years has put me in contact in a lot of trans folk. Most trans people relate to their sex & gender in ways that are far outside the norm. I would say they simply don't map onto the experience of the 99.7%+ of the population who are not trans in many meaningful ways. A MtF person simply does not have the same experience of being male as a cis man d…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:25 AM
4

Join me, fellow non-americans, in laughing at America. I'd love to, but so many people in my age bracket and younger in my country get way more polarised over yank political theatre like this than they even do about our own domestic politics. It's hard to laugh when everyone around you is taking it seriously enough to be staking out in- an out-groups based on what side you take in a job interview happening in a country on the other side of the world, that they have no power to affect and will no…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:28 AM
4

It is dedicated to shocking or highly offensive content And solution is apparently to link to the shocking and highly offensive drivel pushed by alleged sex offender and known scumbag and grifter Michael Kimmel.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:59 AM
26

A big part of the traditional female gender role has always been defining and policing the gender roles of others, male and female (and indeed, social roles of all kinds). There has never been any serious attempt (in the West) at actually deconstructing the female role, not even via feminism. Quite the opposite. The entire exercise of "gender equality" for the past 150 years has been about expanding the territory covered by the female role, but that has never meant giving up or sharing the terri…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:49 AM
2

However when I see people - mainly self-described feminists - mentioning "male privilege" I don't see them mentioning it in the context that you do. Precisely, which is what I was getting at when I said it was an incomplete concept on its own and is often deployed dishonestly. And trying to discuss it in good faith with somebody who understands the term only in that framework becomes almost impossible. I've tried, even when I still considered myself a feminist and just wanted to talk about it wi…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:02 AM
11

To be honest, I actually think that "male privilege" as a concept is not even inherently bad. The way our social system of gender roles has been set up for a thousand years (and more) pretty much guarantees it. The problem is that it is incomplete and tends to be deployed dishonestly. That is, the system as it stands also guarantees "female privilege". But the whole point of framing gender issues in the way they are typically framed - ie. "male privilege", "toxic masculinity", "patriarchy" witho…
/r/MensRights26/09/18 03:18 AM
51

I've never seen the discussion go any other way. Men, you are repressed by your toxic masculinity and need to learn to express your feelings more! WAIT! NO! Not like that! Not those feelings!
/r/MensRights26/09/18 02:26 AM
3

Just because a rape accusation wasn't made to the police, does not make it automatically true! ​ This really is important. I am personally acquainted with someone who has made several accusations of this nature against young men, one of whom is a friend of mine. She has never actually made a police report. Despite all the ready made, off the shelf excuses ("no perfect victims") for this that she trots out when asked, I am confident that the reason is simply because her stories change all the tim…
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:01 AM
5

Because politics is tribal - the majority of people who profess an interest in "politics" don't really care about the details of this or that issue. Most don't even really care about examining those issues even through the analytical frameworks that they claim to adhere to. They certainly don't care about any of your personal objections to one or another bit of the canon dogma that's cohered around the faction you broadly identify with. Most people's explicit political positions are 90% to signa…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:43 AM
4

What actions? No, seriously. What actions are they even taking? Posting anonymous ugly words on an internet forum? Even assuming you consider idle talk to be "action" somehow, does anybody really even care about this? Doing their best to minimise interaction with women in their own lives? Many of them have perfectly reasonable motivations for doing that but even if they didn't, they are not harming anybody by making that choice for themselves (and wouldn't anybody with a low opinion of MGTOW con…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:41 AM
29

Men are more likely to be the victim of violent crimes generally and even more so of violent crimes committed by strangers in public. So while this is tragic, statistically speaking, women who go jogging actually have substantially less to worry about than do men in the same circumstances.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 07:55 AM
3

I have never heard of any of this actually appearing in legislation or court precedent. I'm not by any means an expert on our (deliberately complicated and almost impenetrable) legal system in this area, but I do take an interest and feel like I would be aware if anything this extreme was actually in black and white. I do believe that something like this, with one-sided and gender specific definitions of what constitutes "abuse", this may appear in guidelines issued to state-funded counseling se…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 04:36 AM
3

Reminds me of a story from my childhood. When I was a boy of about 5 years and my father, who for the vast majority of his life has worn a full beard, shaved it off one day at the request of my mother, I was absolutely convinced he wasn't "a dad" anymore. Not a proper one. Proper dads had beards or at least moustaches. I apparently made such a fuss over it that my father immediately (to my mother's supposedly great disappointment and my father's triumph) began to grow it out again and has never …
/r/MensRights26/08/18 03:15 AM
16

anti-queer lol ​ last time I checked it was trans activist feminists who were trying to tell me I can and should be obliged to somehow change my sexual orientation to include attraction to biological females (once they start identifying as men) rather than respecting my identity as a homosexual male. Never had an MRA tell me that.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:49 AM
1

Thanks for your bizarre and unrelated rant in reply to an obviously facetious one-liner about a term that references anatomy. Are you ok?
/r/MensRights25/08/18 02:20 AM
84

is it still a pussy pass if the person in question doesn't have a pussy though? ​ EDIT: for those confused, the person in these tweets is a transwoman - "suck my dick and balls" wasn't just a turn of phrase
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:06 AM
7

If Mama ain't happy, ain't nobody happy
/r/MensRights24/08/18 02:25 AM
4

wtf? Out of the many hetero couples I know and have known over the years, these behaviours are so much more common coming from the woman and directed at the man that attributing them to masculinity, "toxic" or otherwise, seems precisely backwards. Or is it just different somehow depending on which sex is doing it?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:37 AM
14

Let's have a link to that research
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:43 AM
2

Nobody is going to get fired from their job for being a feminist. Nobody is going to have their feminism used against them in a custody hearing.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 04:22 AM
5

Professor Ronell is a lesbian. Pretty weird behaviour for a lesbian. The nickname "cock-er spaniel" in this context and the emails that "frequently detailed her affection and longing for him" would seem to imply that this was not purely an affectionate, platonic friendship between mentor and student, even if the professor rejects Reitman's account of the sexual acts. So what was going on here? As far as the rest of it goes, it's hard to really be sure. We're all familiar with the sorts of standa…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:05 AM
3

They are basically our equivalent of the evangelical "religious right" for sure. With the really off-the-wall "if you don't want to sleep with transwomen you are literally murdering trans people" being our Westboro Baptist.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:54 AM
13

Because in a patriarchal society raising children is largely seen as the womens job, and that bias extends into the legal system itself. lol no. This is revisionist history. In reality, in an era when "patriarchal" was actually a descriptor that could reasonably be applied to our society, the children went to the father by default because he was the head of the household and was held socially and financially responsible for their wellbeing and upbringing. The legal innovation sometimes called th…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:02 AM
1

Koreans in particular have fairly widespread and well documented problems with racism.
/r/MensRights03/08/18 08:16 AM
1

Fucking this. The idea that women are "excluded" from the trades is ludicrous. Construction and resource companies here in Australia in particular are desperate to bring women into the industry. The companies want it, are actively trying to solicit it and even appointing female executives with the explicit goal of attracting more women. The (most powerful in the country) unions support it. The educational institutions and apprenticeship programs offer special incentives to facilitate it. The med…
/r/MensRights03/08/18 05:33 AM
10

I really hope to see this argument continue to be developed here and elsewhere, because it is the single argument that I have had reliable success with when it comes to disabusing people of the notion that "feminism" just means "equality" and getting them to start thinking critically. It leads very neatly to the conclusion that if you genuinely believe prescribed, traditional gender roles are dysfunctional in modern society and should be challenged, then you must be willing to also challenge fem…
/r/MensRights01/08/18 06:52 AM
7

Yep, this reeks of /pol/. I came into the thread to say something like "they really need to change their MO up a bit because nobody is falling for it anymore" but apparently everyone is still falling for it, so godspeed I guess.
/r/MensRights28/07/18 04:40 AM
4

I'll start by saying that I thought the general thrust of the article was good and that I'm glad to see a bit more talk around this topic. But while this is better than many of the similar pieces floating around (one would hope so from a "men's magazine", though often in vain) there is still this underlying implication that this unwillingness to open up , vocalise our needs and all the rest is still largely the fault of the individual or of "men" generally. You see this even when the cause of th…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 02:21 AM
24

I've found that, while gay men can often be a bit dismissive of generalised "men's issues" for a number of reasons (tending to have drunk feminist kool-aid, mostly in high school or seeing them as "straight problems"), this is one of those areas where I think gay blokes might be a bit more switched on than most. The reality is that we see, handle and talk about dicks in all their shapes, sizes and colours probably more than any other segment of the population with the possible exception of profe…
/r/MensRights24/07/18 05:05 AM
6

Sounds like a potential vector for the return of Seduction laws or similar.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 03:35 AM
4

Maybe I'm being naive and tempting Poe's law, but this seems like a parody account.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 06:24 AM
7

Everybody on every side of the debate over laws like these knows that they are not likely to actually change anyone's behaviour when it comes to the sexual act and are not intended to. Nobody really has sex in the "correct" way according to these sorts of regulations, nobody (including and perhaps especially women) wants to and nobody is going to. That is simply not the point. The point is to give women - and we know it will be only women because the cultural context all but guarantees it - a "n…
/r/MensRights19/07/18 02:49 AM
0

Really becoming a sort of pseudo-science isn't it Christ, you said it. Shit, 'pseudo-science' may even be a mite too generous. This is running closer to astrology or those new age self-help books women used to read in the 70s that told them to channel the "divine feminine" and practice vaginal mysticism.
/r/MensRights17/07/18 03:24 AM
3

Well, now we're actually getting somewhere. I actually tend to agree with you, but judging from how big the thread has gotten, it seems we're in the minority on that. But our little dick-waving contest here made my shitty Saturday morning shift at work pass a bit quicker. Thanks man. :)
/r/MensRights14/07/18 04:11 AM
2

Your shaky "just pretending to be retarded" stuff aside... You're in the mensrights subreddit dude, not KotakuInAction or one of the gaming subs. If you aren't here to specifically talk gender politics, what are you even doing here at all?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:50 AM
4

Who gives a shit if the choice to include a female soldier is political. You, apparently, since you came into a thread where the political implications were obvious from the thread title and insisted it was a matter of apolitical "historical accuracy" while also ignoring that everybody else, including the PR department handling the game in question has been pretty upfront about it.
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:29 AM
3

A "wrong weapon" (which is actually not common in these games, though ahistorical mechanical functions of weapons is) has no political implications at all, let alone in our current cultural climate. Again, I'm sorry, but you are still making a meaningless comparison between what are indeed mechanical conceits that very few people have any investment in to an issue that has social implications that many people quite obviously do. My problem isn't "historical accuracy" or "realism", I'm not a hist…
/r/MensRights14/07/18 03:15 AM
3

This is not an issue I really have much of an opinion on - it's a video game, everybody knows going in that it is fantasy and not reality. That said, the point you are making is pretty weak. Your first three examples are mechanical conceits for the sake of making a product function in the medium and genre. The fourth is an deliberate choice in art direction and the response to public criticism from PR has been to stake out a political position. You can certainly argue about the merits aesthetic …
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:33 AM
1

What if the only people involved were male? Mutual rape or no rape?
/r/MensRights14/07/18 02:12 AM
9

I cannot think of a single instance in recent memory where I have given an explicit verbal (or written I guess) yes before having sex. In fact, I don't believe any of the sex I've had lately has even been preceeded by a verbal request for consent from my partner, let alone been followed by my giving an answer. Does this mean I've been raped?!
/r/MensRights13/07/18 11:10 AM
10

Lucky for you our esteemed OP Peter Wright (assuming it's the same bloke) has written extensively and persuasively on the subject in his books and website at gynocentrism.com
/r/MensRights13/07/18 10:37 AM
2

I respect individuals, not abstract demographic categories. And individuals have my respect by default, right up until they do or say something that I feel renders them undeserving of it. I feel that most people, certainly at least most people I know, also operate along the same lines. But I will admit that when some authority - be that government, corporate media, powerful lobby groups, etc - demands I must respect some person, group or idea, I do tend to become suspicious and skeptical. Maybe …
/r/MensRights13/07/18 07:57 AM
2

Give me some examples of this In the 4-5 years and different accounts that I've lurked on this sub, I don't think I have ever seen a single instance of someone who comes here saying this stuff who then actually provides some evidence when challenged to do so. Most don't even bother to handwave it away, they just disappear.
/r/MensRights13/07/18 04:09 AM
11

The thing is lots of gay men think that male bashing isn't targeting them This is certainly true, but I think less so now than even a just few years ago. There have been several high-profile attacks in recent years by, for instance, Hollywood figures like Rose McGowan, on gay men as a collective and other incidents like university LGBT groups pushing gay men out of leadership positions etc. as we are now apparently "privileged". They are not going unnoticed. In some ways, now that many/most of t…
/r/MensRights13/07/18 03:50 AM
2

You think that if I "identify as a person with a disability" I could get a disability pension?
/r/MensRights10/07/18 09:25 AM
7

It's even possible we'll see the next generation of leftists leading the charge on men's rights in pursuit of actual (egalitarian) gender policies. Some of us are working quietly toward that goal, but it's difficult to really understand how powerful the feminist clique is on the broader left without experiencing it. In my experience, there is a quiet and growing undercurrent of dissatisfaction with the current gender paradigm on the left but everyone is afraid of speaking out for fear of becomin…
/r/MensRights10/07/18 08:23 AM
2

While I don't really have a opinion on the issues in this exchange at this point, given that the post you're replying to includes a bunch of links and some statistics to support its premise, you might want to actually address some of it instead of just declaring you're correct because of special knowledge based on your personal anecdotes.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:45 AM
3

Ernest Belfort Bax, socialist and sometimes considered the "father of the men's rights movement" was actually writing about female sex privilege in the criminal justice system in Britain over 100 years ago. We have seen now the privilege at the expense of the man which the law itself and still more its administration affords to women. It remains to consider the preferential treatment in prison after conviction. What prison discipline is for the male offender is perfectly well known: He is liable…
/r/MensRights06/07/18 09:17 AM
2

Sarah Hanson-Young and David Leyonhjelm are really both walking piles of shit that deserve each other more than the public deserve either of them. But at least he manages to be funny while being a massive douchebag while she is a joyless sadsack (and abuses her travel allowance).
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:49 AM
3

One thing I’ve learned from dating is that women are afraid a lot of the time. Something I've noticed being friends with a couple of transwomen (MtF) and a transman (FtM) is how much this really does seem to be hormonal. While my transwomen friends are usually very touchy about the topic (not without reason - people they've just met seem to feel like it's OK to ask the most intrusive and personal questions about their transition and bodies the moment the topic comes up), they have confided in me…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 07:25 AM
4

mate, perhaps you should take a look in the mirror before you start throwing around accusations of "confirmation bias"
/r/MensRights27/06/18 08:34 AM
2

don't people play board games with their friends? why would you keep going to someone's house / letting someone come to your house to play board games if they're a douchebag?
/r/MensRights26/06/18 07:28 AM
2

It's weird how embedded this revisionist history has become in the culture, isn't it? u/girlwriteswhat has done some great bits on the actual reality of the coverture laws etc. that governed the legal and economic status of the sexes that are quite enlightening.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:44 AM
10

You know, stuff like that really can cause a person to do things they would otherwise find unconscionable. And while it's not an excuse for the behaviour or for completely abjugating responsibility, I don't have a problem with the circumstances being presented as mitigating factors or as ways to understand why it happened and to help us as a society prevent such events in future. Everyone who's lived more than 20 years has probably been in situations where we were overwhelmed and did something m…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:19 AM
2

Young men are lazy and entitled, refusing to grow up This notion has been on the rise for probably decades at this point. I think it was intended at first to be a sort of generational shaming thing to encourage young men to think of themselves as being the exception to this rule and thus work hard and contribute to demonstrate that. I also think it probably worked for a while and isn't working anymore. I know a bunch of guys in their early-mid 20s who honestly probably fit this stereotype (in fa…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 02:35 AM
3

Women are Wonderful means that any immoral or criminal act committed by a woman must, by definition, be an aberration. Not just among women as a demographic, but even for that individual. Hence why you always get "well she was such a good mum, but she just snapped" "it's not her fault, she was ill" "husband wasn't supporting her" etc etc. "Woman" is rarely held responsible, let alone "women". The facts can just be reported without spin because it does not and cannot reflect on "women" as a whole…
/r/MensRights20/06/18 06:27 AM
5

doesn't actually help anyone. It helps pump more public funding into feminist advocacy programs in schools and keeps feminist pundits in the money more broadly
/r/MensRights19/06/18 06:06 AM
2

The barrier to entry to be a "movie critic" is just about non-existent. An internet connection is pretty much all you need. Get a Wordpress site or get a cheap camera and a youtube account and have at it. The idea that the established media has a certain demographic skew in who makes up "professional movie critics" is probably true - but most of these are players in legacy media that is in decline. More than that, notice how the attitudes regarding these critics can turn on a dime? The "old whit…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 05:10 AM
2

TL;DR - No, but the situation is sticky. Let me see if I can shed a little light here, apologies for the wall of text. I suppose it comes down to what you consider a "fair share" versus what benefits we'd gain. There certainly are issues that are in the MRM's wheelhouse that affect gay men just as much and occasionally even more acutely than others - the suicide epidemic is perhaps one of those. There is also homelessness as I encountered in my story above and legal problems in the criminal just…
/r/MensRights19/06/18 02:30 AM
5

And now, as men's rights are seriously endangered, the gays aren’t really affected, so they don’t care much. It really depends how you look at it and what you're exposed to. An anecdote from my youth as a gay man - When I had trouble at home related to my sexuality and was forced to leave, I was homeless and sleeping rough for some months in between short periods of couch surfing. This is a really common occurrence even today despite the progress that's been made. Every time I was directed to a …
/r/MensRights16/06/18 06:01 AM
2

It certainly seems that "masculine norms" are almost uniformly spun in a way that would constitute "harmful stereotypes" if the same approach was taken to "feminine norms".
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:43 AM
9

Probably about time to post this old chestnut again: There Are No Girls on The Internet
/r/MensRights15/06/18 02:20 AM
5

> "nice guys", "incels", "chuds", "neckbeards", "manchildren" > soibois these terms and the culture of humiliation that surround them mostly come from the same source of the more prescriptive, traditional notions of masculinity and distaste for those men who can't or won't live up to the ideal. From Peterson fans and the like, it's par for the course because despite some of the flowery Jungian language, the man and his followers are just garden variety conservatives - good or bad depending on yo…
/r/MensRights12/06/18 05:25 AM
9

Literally all I have seen about this apparent controversy is blog posts and articles decrying the furious men complaining about women in this game, but never have I actually seen any of these supposed furious men making these complaints except a handful of tweets with no likes or RTs from nobody accounts with 20 bot followers. This is despite being acquainted with many of the kind of people who usually end up being pointed to as the "toxic gamer bros" or whatever. this whole thing smells like a …
/r/MensRights08/06/18 09:22 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter