TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

i_reddited_it Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by i_reddited_it on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

It absolutely is nonsense that women are always portrayed as the victim, and the stigma that men are always the monsters is equally maddening. I see it all the time, and a lot of people reinforce it not even realizing that they do. I hope it stops one day, and I see the relevance of these stories used as a counter to this perception. This would be an excellent story to link to in response to the argument that women are always the victim, but where I'm coming from is that without that argument be…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:22 PM
0

Where did I say to stop discussing it? I suggested posting this to /r/wtf because I thought it would get more people reading and discussing it. My opinion was simply that this is not necessarily a men's rights issue. What you mean to say is that if I chose not to classify this the way that you want to classify it then my argument holds no weight, which is fine, doesn't bother me. But it's a bit hypocritical to accuse me of wanting to stop discussing it and then telling me shut my mouth, essentia…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 11:01 PM
-7

Anti male rubbish? You've got to be kidding. You take a single quote and jab at it, not bothering to factor in the entirely of my statement and then come back at me when I show you how ridiculous it is to cherry pick an argument, and then follow it up with "anti-male"? Those are the same tactics that extremists use as recruiting tactics for the weak minded. The people that I'm talking to, the ones that put thought into opposing arguments before dismissing it as "rubbish", those are the ones I st…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 09:55 PM
0

Again, I can see your point, but I'll say it again; "they do it too" is not a solid argument for changing that attitude. Of course it is. Unless it's being challenged that women don't abuse children, no it's not. Nowhere in that article does it even hint that this isn't typical of women. It's a fucked up mother abusing her son. It's pointing out a disparity where none should exist and calling for equality. It's the whole point of the men's rights movement. Where does it call for equality? This i…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 09:42 PM
-8

female rape victims should receive no support because they are women. Abused children should get no consideration from children's rights groups. You fucking monster! Taking a small quote out of context to prove a point is a shitty way to make a point, huh?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 08:50 PM
-3

Again, I can see your point, but I'll say it again; "they do it too" is not a solid argument for changing that attitude. I will say that it's useful in terms of backing up false claims such as "he's a man and men are abusers". Certainly, some men abuse women, children, other men, animals, etc..., but we can find plenty of cases where women are also the abusers. Absolutely this is relevant, but it should be a response to a false claim, not a leading argument. It makes a bigger impact when we show…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 07:53 PM
-6

Men's Rights is also about men as victims. I completely agree! I think where we differ is "victims of what?" A man being beaten, brutalized, assaulted, or abused for no other reason than he has a dick, yes; men's rights. But calling it men's rights solely based on the fact that the victim is male and the aggressor is female should not be in the criteria. Until that woman gets off with a lighter punishment than a man would have received for the same crime, that's a human's rights issue. Men get a…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 07:30 PM
18

Ok, that I can kind of see, but I have to squint to see it. Where I have a problem with it is that it ceases to be a men's rights issue and becomes more of a "see, women do it too" issue. I don't think this sub should be about calling attention to the fact that women can do fucked up things too. If that's the route we want to go why not post articles about the good things that men's support groups do for people like donating resources to battered children's hospitals or stories on the big brothe…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 04:39 PM
8

I did see it. I guess I'm more of the mind of fixing an error instead of propagating it. It's funny that you call me lazy for reading the article and pointing out a huge glaring mistake, but leaving the title wrong instead of taking the 30 seconds to fix it is ok because reddit automatically does it. That seems pretty lazy to me. Shit like this is why people don't take this sub seriously anymore. This isn't a men's rights issue, the title is misleading, and instead of admitting to and fixing err…
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:31 PM
6

I thought you could change the title. Not blaming anyone, just saying.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:09 PM
1

I'm looking at the mobile version so I guess I can't see the comments, but that's fucked up. Anything to push a political point, I guess. Some people, man.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:07 PM
19

Turning "burning his penis" into "burning his penis off" is an embellishment. And it looks like she'll be going to jail so... due process seems to be working here. If she got away with it because she was a woman or if he were legally punished for it because he is a man; that seems more like a men's rights issue. This is more wtf material, cause honestly... wtf?
/r/MensRights22/10/13 02:04 PM
61

No need to embellish on the title. Burning his dick is certainly harsh enough to warrant a read. Also, you should probably post this in /r/wtf, you'll probably get more people reading in there. Not really a men's rights issue. Shitty bitch though, for sure.
/r/MensRights22/10/13 01:50 PM
7

Source? The only mention of custody I saw in the article was that the boys were released to their father's custody, which is just a legal term for "who will be responsible for them". Doesn't mean they are divorced... yet, anyway.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:56 PM
4

The truth is that many people get different punishments for the same crime all the time. Many factors come into play such as a first time offender vs. repeat offender, premeditated vs. spur of the moment, intent, circumstance, even things like current political and social environments and influences. It all plays a key factor in how sentences are handed down. In this case, she absolutely got off far too easy, as far as jail time goes. Is it because she's a woman? Is it because she's pregnant? Is…
/r/MensRights07/10/13 08:43 PM
8

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/sep/02/babies-sugar-pain-relief-warning " Babies are usually given a dose of one-tenth of a gram of sucrose, a concentrated sugar solution, into their mouths before a procedure starts because doctors believe that it reduces, but does not remove, the pain involved." Let that soak in... "reduced, but does not remove, the pain involved." so what if it can damage their brain, at least they still get their penis chopped! That was my point that started this whol…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 10:07 PM
6

Chopping off the most sensitive part of your penis is going to hurt. I don't give a shit how old you are, pain is pain. How are you being dismissive? You're going on "I was at a bris once and the baby cried." Not only is that dismissive, it's arrogant as fuck. Here, how do you like it... Sorry my personal experience isn't as scientific as your Google search, Mr. Nye. Apples and oranges? Really? Your quoted painkiller is sugar, which I'm sure most people can get without a prescription. So what yo…
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:55 PM
3

I take it you've never been to a bris. I've seen it, worse yet I've heard it. There is real pain there and a little bit of sugar doesn't make it painless. You want to talk about being dismissive; take a look at your comment. Edit: that's bris, not brisk.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:21 PM
-3

< there is justification to do it just after birth when it causes no pain. I think you meant to say "when you're too young to remember the pain."
/r/MensRights22/08/13 07:00 PM
4

I'd honestly never heard that before. That really sucks (no pun intended). I can certainly see why it would be a serious consideration for you. I hope it all works out for you.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 06:55 PM
10

I can't even enjoy a BJ from my wife because that region is so sensitive. Does not compute; please explain.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 05:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter