TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iamaom Archive

View 0 posts and 226 comments by iamaom on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Drones, tanks, jets, etc. The US military can do whatever it wants on us soil and our leaders wouldn't even have to get out of their chair. If you really think a few rifle collections are going to stop the most powerful military in your world you are sadly delusional.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:25 AM
-1

While I agree with your sentiment, your right to bear arms wouldn't stop the us military from doing anything they didn't want to.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:22 PM
3

I agree. Rape is rape but 17 is more than old enough to decide to have sex with someone else. It shouldn't matter if the someone else is 2 years older or 20, legal is legal.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 12:00 PM
1

Liberals, like feminists only care about women's issues Is there really a need for blanket statements. #notallliberals That said a lot of people call themselves liberal or left (like me) because there's really no other [common] term to describe us.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 07:03 PM
31

Shame they filmed it vertically the whole time.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 09:28 PM
3

It is not like that women is a threat though no need to get physical back. That's the whole point of this sub man, women are "weaker" than men and present them "no" danger so men should just put up with being abused. It's a bullshit 19th century way of thinking. She socked him right in the jaw, she could have broken it. Anyone assaulting you is a danger.
/r/PussyPass30/07/14 11:21 PM
1

Link?
/r/MensRights25/07/14 01:31 AM
1

there is a proper time and a proper place to bring it back Not in a civilized society there isn't.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 11:00 PM
2

Even if this didn't exist the argument would not make any sense. Any [functioning] condom will prevent STDs better than circumcision, and the effects do not stack.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:01 AM
1

Not quite. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumcision_and_law#Norway_and_region
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:59 AM
8

Or just.. Hereby in the Year of Our Lord 2014, none shall cut the genitals of a baby without due cause.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 04:57 AM
0

Language is thought. While the influence on language exists, your statement is wrong. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/relativism/supplement2.html
/r/MensRights21/07/14 09:06 PM
1

In some languages Like...?
/r/MensRights19/07/14 11:41 PM
2

what is circumcision going to do? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Harvey_Kellogg#Masturbation_Prevention
/r/MensRights17/07/14 07:08 PM
14

is there ANY movies where a woman has to "woman up" and start acting nicer, and doing work? Shrek.
/r/PussyPass13/07/14 07:05 PM
4

The problem people are having is that you are calling them twats in the video for doing nothing other than having an opinion differing than yours. In the video the pro-lifers did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:06 AM
6

We have decided, as a democratic society, that abortion is not the same as murder. But not everyone accepts that decision, and they have arguments which you are misconstruing to make them look bad. I'm 100% pro-choice but I don't make up shit about other people.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:51 AM
2

I had to drill it into my step dad when we were driving through mountains of Idaho that if a deer steps into the road, you plow right through that son of a bitch, you don't try to swerve or do anything stupid (like get out of the car and carry it's purse and help it across the road). Car vs Deer, car wins. That's not true at all. In some parts of the US it is illegal to hit a deer. Car vs Deer everyone looses
/r/PussyPass07/07/14 11:03 PM
14

They downvote anything they deem unworthy, upvotes are hidden on their subreddits. They also doxed the admin of creepshots, and have threatened to dox a few others. Doxing is not allowed on reddit and people have been banned for it, yet the reddit admins turn a blind eye to SRS (and its not like SRS is an unknown subreddit, they have made waves on this site before).
/r/MensRights19/08/13 01:23 AM
1

I did too. I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for PZ's insane rantings though. He kept bitching about MRA's, I didn't know what an MRA was, and next thing I know I'm here.
/r/MensRights10/08/13 03:33 AM
7

but isn't this something the police should investigate? Yes it is, and if the allegations had any weight why haven't this been reported to the police yet? It seems dubious that actual sexual assault victims would send emails to friends to post on blogs (with a lot of readers) instead of taking it to the authorities.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:41 PM
3

We cannot enforce non-participation Non-NP links to other subreddits will be removed from now on Sounds like enforcing to me.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 01:28 AM
6

"Do you think men should be equal to women? Then you're an MRA." Any counter argument they have can just be repeated, only replace MRA with feminism.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:41 AM
-3

Legally no, but the human mind doesn't conform to a countries laws. Some countries the drinking age is as low as 16 or 15. They are not children, they knew very well the potential consequences of their actions. /r/mensrights is being very hypocritical right now. If the genders were reversed I'm sure you guys wouldn't be having the same reaction ("don't be that girl" doesn't mean anything now I guess). This is why this subreddit gets such a bad reputation, you go off in a tangent without thinking…
/r/MensRights31/07/13 11:32 AM
-19

If they consented to both drinking and sex, it was not rape. Also, the "nice" image is from a southpark episode, in a scene that is actually criticizing society's reaction to older female on younger male sex. edit:grammar
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:19 AM
5

Both can get breast cancer While true, it's not as common was women breast cancer. Also, all the marketing for breast cancer is at women: it's all pink, all feely, only see women walking those walks, only hear about how brave some guys wife was. It doesn't do anything to spread awareness about breast cancer in men. I had a bio class in highschool once, where the teacher mentioned that men can get breast cancer too, half the class laughed.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:27 PM
1

I've watched her videos, she TVTropes makes some interesting points.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:59 PM
3

Thunderf00t made some good videos about her too. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJeX6F-Q63I
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:46 PM
1

are you going to say that false accusation are covered by free speech? No, but to say an entire site needs to be taken down because one of their writers made a false accusation is ridiculous, it should be handled on an individual basis not a sweeping judgement. The same thing has happened on reddit (boston bomber mishap) but I don't think you'd want the entire site taken down.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:48 PM
3

Jezebell needs to be removed from the internet. So in a thread defending free speech some may disagree with, you want to deny another group that freedom because you disagree with them?
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:05 PM
2

Anything on To say everything written on a major news website like Huntington post is garbage is taking it too far. It's not real. To a lot of people it is though. You can't ignore something because you don't like it or agree with it. You have to be able to provide proof as to why its bullshit. You look really ignorant to an outside perspective if someone quotes Jezebell and you dismiss them "because I don't like that website" and not on the basis of real evidence. Think of a redneck dismissing …
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:04 PM
1

Who knows, there may not have eben been a model. Gene pool is only so big, if you draw a realistic human its bound to look like someone.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 01:46 AM
1

Because all democrats represent all liberals and MRAs. /s
/r/MensRights04/07/13 05:21 PM
1

But chivalry by definition is towards women. When it goes both ways its called common courtesy.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 06:56 PM
19

Can we please stop posting 4chan posts, seriously is this going to become a thing? It's fucking 4chan. Not only is there is no evidence of this happening whatsoever, but it has nothing to do with men's rights. Feels is that way >> http://www.reddit.com/r/datfeel
/r/MensRights30/06/13 05:25 AM
16

"I'ma beat your ass" Uses pepper spray. Runs like the wind. What a coward.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 03:41 AM
1

It's true that some 13 year olds are immature and won't be able to handle sex but doesn't mean they all aren't. Making it illegal for all 13 year olds to have sex because a few are fucking stupid is as stupid as banning alcohol because some people abuse it. They should be educated about sex. That's the most you can do. I don't think 13 year olds who don't have sex are "stupid" and I do not blame this 13 year old in any way. I just think a grown 35 year old women is too old for a 13 year old. I n…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:18 PM
10

You say this now as an adult, but when you were 13 I'm sure you would have looked at things a bit differently. 13 year olds might talk shit, but most are not emotionally mature enough to handle a relationship of this caliber, not to mention if he's a late bloomer he might not have even started puberty yet.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 04:03 AM
16

Who'da thought separate but equal would still be in law books in 2013. Absurd.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:59 AM
3

District 9 had a good single father, though its not exactly a children movie.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 03:52 PM
0

Many immoral things may appear See, this is the fundamental flaw of your argument. Moral values are different for every person. A religious fundamentalist could use your argument to ban gay marriage and make sodomy illegal.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 07:03 PM
3

That woman on the tv is scary. "We're not convicting enough rapists.." What the fuck? Is there a rape conviction quota? You're not legally a rapist until you're convicted, she's assuming men being brought up on charged are already rapists before a court decides it. She's assuming every man whose found not guilty is a rapist who got away.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 06:00 AM
1

When you have campaigns like this I'd say its pretty reasonable. If you were looking for a more something more official sounding I'd go with the disposable male/protected women thing. But they're both speculation and are just guesses.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 12:22 AM
1

Nielsons said that 13million women a month watch porn. Yeah women are not possibly perverts. Implying watching porn makes you a pervert; I mean, if everyone does it then its not perverse behavior.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:04 AM
7

People like boobs, they can see them and appreciate them. Prostates...not so much.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:02 AM
10

Not to mention every bathroom I've been in has the toilet facing you, it's kinda hard to miss seeing if the seat is down/up. It's like they go into the bathroom backwards.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:13 AM
-2

If you had locked your car, your laptop wouldn't have been stolen Que: "NOW YOUR COMPARING WOMEN TO CARS?!??"
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:11 AM
0

I know that I'm probably completely unwelcome here, as both a feminist and a female Troll detected.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 10:12 PM
1

Video
/r/MensRights17/06/13 04:57 AM
2

Community up in arms I don't think the Eve community has ever not been up in arms.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 11:01 PM
1

They were talking about WoW in that quote. Edit: But honestly, scamming is a part of any economy. :P
/r/MensRights06/06/13 10:52 PM
5

ignore that retarded little girl before the industry gets the impression that shes important The problem is that they already have, and others like her. Anyone who doesn't agree with her view point ignoring her will just give the impression there's no opposition.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:45 AM
-1

Not to mention getting DNA isn't hard. Everything you drink or eat from is going to have your DNA on there. If the police want your DNA that bad they just gotta raid your trash and swab a cup.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:42 AM
1

Notice how she keeps saying rape specifically. She was ok with holocaust jokes, despite holocaust victims going through much more trauma. She's a real life SJW from tumblr.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 07:04 AM
30

So, instead of choosing to respond with an actual argument, you're just going to copy a lazy, sarcastic, non-answer from a feminist? I'm sure that will win many people over to the MR movement.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 02:35 AM
5

Come on Dawkins, your you're much to smart to be drawn into twitter battles.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 04:03 PM
-4

You don't need one to have an ideology.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:59 PM
3

Because a lot of /r/MensRights users think anyone who has a question about their position must be a feminist attack dog.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:55 PM
0

The Blank Slate by Steven Pinker is a book about the entire subject (it even has a section about feminism). You can pick it up on amazon used for like 7 bucks.
/r/MensRights21/05/13 11:52 PM
1

Not to mention something as basic as asking for her name is offensive, and then they lead you into a loop. just tell her your name and don't ask for hers. If she wants to tell you hers, she will. And many events have badges with names on them anyway. [don't] Stare at her badge for a long time trying to read it. You are staring at her chest, most likely.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:24 PM
0

If you cut the male population and half, and not regulate it any more than that, it will eventually equal out again. Being male will be advantageous, as all men will get to spread their genes but not all women will, so the number of Y chromosomes in the population will continue to increase until it becomes equally (biologically) advantageous with women again.
/r/MensRights20/05/13 06:07 PM
1

But that comment led to the next people upvoting her not because she was right, but because she was a woman. Win some, loose some I guess. :\
/r/MensRights19/05/13 12:16 AM
10

Unhappy with their bodies? Really? I don't like my nose, does this make ME unhappy with MY body? What an ambiguosly pointless statistic. Not to mention body issues are a normal part of a teenagers life.
/r/MensRights19/05/13 12:12 AM
-1

This video is reposted every month or two. We've had this conversation dozens of times.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:59 PM
2

Reminded me of...
/r/MensRights13/05/13 01:06 AM
3

these are not worth functionally crippling another human being for the rest of their life. Nor is rape in many cases. If you don't want your arm cut off, then don't steal in a society where that is the de facto punishment for theft We live in a society where rapists are sent to prison, not have their pesnis's removed. It is not a defacto punishment in our society.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 02:23 PM
40

Having your penis cut off is worse than rape. The punishment does not fit the crime, that even goes beyond eye for an eye. A woman losing her tits are not comparable to a man losing his penis. Penis is much worse.
/r/MensRights04/05/13 03:13 AM
1

That seems terribly narrow minded.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 10:48 PM
0

See you keep saying "feminist" and "feminism" as if representative of the whole group but fail to show proof the majority of people who call themselves feminists actually feel this way. This is a generalization, not a hard fact.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:36 AM
0

I know why MRA's are opposed to types of feminism, but there is way to much generalization that goes on in this subreddit, to the point of absurdity. There's a reason it gets the reputation it has.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:40 PM
0

Uh no, I've been on /r/MR for over a year now. This is what pisses me off about this sub. Instead of actually doing anything, its a lot of it is needless anti-feminism circle jerk. To say jezebel represents all of feminism is absolutely untrue and everyone knows it. It's like /r/athiesm proclaiming the WBC is representative of all christains. A lot of MRA's here can't say anything positive about anyone who associates with feminism or they feel infected or something. If anything is touched by fem…
/r/MensRights27/04/13 11:00 PM
-2

This sounds like a feminist argument itself, replace feminism with MRA. It's the opposite of no true scotsman, instead of trying to exclude crazies your saying they are representative of the whole group. Please tell me why feminism doe not get to separate itself into extremist and non-extremist categories while other groups do?
/r/MensRights27/04/13 10:59 PM
-6

I'd hardly call anything on jezebel representative of feminism as a whole. They're a bunch of trolls and extremists. It's like the /b/ of feminism.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 12:33 PM
36

Not if they have money.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 11:03 PM
24

Yet they don’t mention that suicide attempts by women are three to four times higher and are often linked to sexual abuse Isn't this just "WHAT ABOUT THE WOMENZ"?
/r/MensRights18/04/13 05:09 PM
4

Lawyers are such trash. She's legally entitled to a lawyer, and it may not be the most honorable job but someone has to do it. Who knows, maybe the shitty defense is on purpose because her lawyer wants her in jail too, but he's legally and professionally obligated to do his "best".
/r/MensRights18/04/13 06:13 AM
12

young girls still aren't comfortable with their body image. That's not a society issue, its just called growing up.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:25 AM
2

I also found it weird that when children don't get a proper sex education, these people turn to the school system and blame it for something parents should be doing.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:24 AM
1

Ah ok, yeah I didn't even know this "bounty hunting" thing was legal until I saw this video. Thanks for clarification.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 03:43 AM
6

I'm sure you have your fair share of crazies "over there". If you post your country I'm sure I could come up with a dozen newspapers reports of people being dumbasses.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 01:17 AM
1

Depends on if you win.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:04 AM
1

Or you could just use all that frozen sperm from sperm banks.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:28 AM
1

gradually transformed into something else. In other words...evolution. Natural selection is a mechanism for evolution, they are not synonymous.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 04:24 AM
-9

Ok, I'm sick of this bullshit. This is like, the 3rd time this month this same exact video has been uploaded. Can we just sticky this thing? OP doesn't care about the issue, he just reuploaded the video on a sock account for views and karma.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:31 PM
5

What sexual identity do you identify with? Two-spirit What? Also, what's with those penis bend pictures? You have one that curves entirely back to the body o.O
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:46 AM
2

but then technically all men are a minority, by a slim margin. No?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 03:35 PM
14

Old, but still pretty bad. What gets me is that the news replayed the sexual assault tape over and fucking over on national television, because its not like the boy wasn't embarrassed enough. Bunch of fucking cockroaches.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 04:17 AM
1

I think part of the problem is that the human mind is very malleable, and in a vulnerable state if the psychologist suggested something or seemed weary of their patients account it might screw with their head, making any memory of what happened even less accurate.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 04:05 AM
9

They were being rude, distracting, and trying to assert their dudely privilege in one of the few moments granted women during a conference dominated by men Great job making shit out of nowhere PZ. He acts as if he were there.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 09:33 PM
1

inShare8 Adria Richards: Lawyers say firing of developer who outed inappropriate comments on Twitter hard to defend in court By Dan Nakaso [email protected] Posted: 03/22/2013 05:27:32 PM PDT Updated: 03/23/2013 09:14:08 AM PDT Related Stories Mar 21: Firings, backlash follow tweets of 'sexual' comments at tech conference The company that fired a female tech developer who tweeted about comments she overheard at a Santa Clara conference said in a blog post that "publicly shaming" the men wa…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:11 AM
4

Just as calling a baby cow "veal" makes it more appetising [sic] People who know nothing about linguistics should not write about it. Veal comes from the french word for calf. In fact most of our meat terms come from romantic roots, while our animal terms come from English's germanic roots. This is because after the Normandy Invasion a lot of british royalty spoke french, and the common "vulgar" language was English. It has nothing to do with making it sound more or less appealing. Beef (romanti…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 11:54 PM
2

After reading the comments and different interpretations of the quote, I have no clue what to think now.
/r/MensRights23/03/13 06:47 AM
2

That has nothing to do with what I said. She got potential customers fired. It has nothing to do with beliefs.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:46 PM
-3

Where's the jew part come in?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:09 AM
9

She called her self a "developer evangelist", her job was to get developers on board with her company. Instead she got 2 of them fired. That sounds like it'd affect the company a great deal, knowing their employees get potential clients fired on a whim.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:06 AM
2

Comments are closed, what a coward.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 08:32 PM
1

I think it should be changed to "statutory sex" then, as calling it rape only further muddles and broadens the word.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 04:23 PM
4

To be fair, she did only ask for a few thousand.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 04:18 AM
0

expel alumni because of the mere acusation. I think it'd be funny if you accused one of the people saying this of rape.
/r/MensRights18/03/13 02:31 PM
2

What an awful subreddit. I don't doubt it, just know nothing about it. Oh yeah, atheists sure don't believe shit without evidence...
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:29 PM
3

What on earth is "ceepolk"?
/r/MensRights15/03/13 07:27 PM
1

Then start doing so. Language matters, a lot. To someone who opposes feminism you should see that. Beta Male implies that men are on some sort of hierarchy like dogs or chickens.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 03:25 AM
1

Pretty much. A lot of people in this thread would've probably done nothing too. Its one thing watching a video, its another when it is happening in front of you. Everyone imagines themselves the hero.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:59 PM
3

Your response has nothing to do with the Alpha/Beta male garbage. We are not dogs, we are humans who react differently in different situations. Isn't calling someone a "Beta" because they aren't being a "real" man the same sexism this subbreddit tries to fight against (hint: Gender stereotypes).
/r/MensRights13/03/13 07:57 PM
1

I'm not opposed to Africa, I'm not opposed to curing aids, but the political cartoon at the top of the article implied that it was somehow our responsibility to fix others problems.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 05:53 AM
-6

Can someone remind me why its the west's problem to take care of Africa's aids? They gave it to us. Besides, it's not like we're ignoring it, just the other day a frontpage article was posted that (United States) scientists just cured a baby with aids.
/r/MensRights09/03/13 04:21 AM
9

"I never suggested censoring speech - but it shouldn't be promoted - which it is, by being ignored" What.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:04 PM
1

Hmm...so is an unsuccessful rape still rape or is it sexual assault?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 11:42 PM
1

If its a private company then they should be able to discriminate against whoever they want (men, women, blacks, jews, red-heads, etc.). If you don't like the discrimination don't use their services, vote with your wallets.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:06 PM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question
/r/MensRights26/02/13 05:38 PM
1

Do you have any evidence of this? Of the correlation with the "destroying" of black families and the prominence of feminism in today's society? If you can't provide any evidence then I can't accept this any more than patriarchy theory. (and no, "it's obvious" is not evidence)
/r/MensRights26/02/13 04:30 AM
2

Tried reporting it for "Violent or Repulsive Content" but oddly enough there is no category for excessive gore or anything, just stupid sub categories like "adults fighting". Even if it weren't posted in this context, keep this shit on liveleak.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:50 AM
4

I forgot the episode, but there was one were they did take 3 min out and explained to people the show was biased towards their point of view. They even poke fun and call they're experiments "non-scientific bullshit experiments". It really just is (thought-provoking) entertainment.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:03 AM
2

I originally came here because Rebecca Watson made a point of highlighting what a cesspool r/mra is I came here on a similar note. It was when elevator gate was still fresh, and PZ Myers made a couple posts spitting venom about MRAs. "What the hell is an MRA and why does PZ hate them?" Next thing I know I'm subbed here.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 12:56 AM
-1

Well of course this isn't the worst misuse of statistics ever, I never said it was. Simply pointing out that what almightybob said was wrong, which it is, numerically speaking, wrong. And apparently you agree with me so I'm not seeing what the problem is here.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:07 AM
-4

41% and 28% are hardly comparable to all but 1.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 02:36 AM
-14

The only group who don't want equal treatment for women is women 28% of men voted against equal treatment of women, therefore women aren't the only group who don't want equal treatment for women. Unless we're going for a majority takes all thing here? In that case that's a pretty shitty way of manipulating data to fit a view point.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:57 AM
-10

Well 38% 28% of men voted no, so your statement isn't correct. edit: Can't math.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 12:16 AM
6

"It was bad that when a guy got his penis cut off, everyone laughed" <everyone in the audience laughs> I don't think the audience had much of a brain...
/r/MensRights17/02/13 06:24 PM
2

They have only been exposed to uber civilized privileged LGBT She's calling LGBT privileged. I think this person is insane in every definition of the word. Relevant smbc.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:26 PM
4

I feel sorry for the kid who's stockphoto they used. Talk about bad luck brian.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 12:24 AM
2

[Annnnd we wait.] (http://imgur.com/1r28BIz) Sources showing women aren't experiencing a "violence problem". http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv11.pdf http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv09.pdf
/r/MensRights11/02/13 02:06 AM
2

This is ridiculous. Norton is a (supposedly) virus blocking and eliminating program, it should have no business blocking any computer safe site and should be blind to actual content. The argument should have never gotten to "is avfm sexist" it should be "why the hell is Norton sticking its nose into people's personal lives".
/r/MensRights09/02/13 04:09 AM
4

Age of consent in a lot of states is 16, I'd hardly consider 15-18 a child.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:08 PM
12

The world is not black and white, left vs right, conservative vs liberal. Two liberals can hold different beliefs on any number of issues just like a catholic vs a protestant. I see no reason to blame "liberal" thinking for this.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 06:53 PM
2

As someone who doesn't even use facebook, why is G+ so criticized?
/r/MensRights30/01/13 07:53 PM
40

Because she represents this entire group of "girl gamerz" that has popped up in the past couple of years who want to change gaming because they find some stuff personally offensive. Anyone who disagrees with her (usually) is labeled sexist and a troll.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 02:59 PM
1

While it shouldn't consume you, I don't like the attitude of "whats done is done". People will see that you didn't really mind it, so assume their son will just have the same shrug-it-off attitude and get them circumcised anyways. At some point resistance needs to be applied or nothing will get done. Not everyone is happy being circumcised (me included) and that needs to be emphasized.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 06:01 AM
0

I know but it might happen again one day, who knows? I was just speculating.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 04:17 AM
7

I wonder if society will look down on women getting pregnant in the same manner it looks down on men dodging the draft. Who am I kidding? Probably not.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:37 PM
1

Wow took like 100 comments for someone to finally post the video, kudos to you sir.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 03:40 AM
4

No, they're all coconut.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 03:52 AM
4

Women Some feminists aren't likely to maintain calm during any gender related discussion FTFY. Seriously, its shit like this that gets MRA's a bad name.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 02:14 PM
9

Liberal != political left != feminism Please stop lumping everything you don't like into one group.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:03 AM
4

Disgusting.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:54 AM
11

Pretty much TF's whole blog. Long story short: Thunderfoot was invited to have a blog over at freethoughblogs by PZ Myers. Thunderfoot's first post was him criticizing the type of feminism Skepchick et al. are spreading. PZ got pissed, banned thunderfoot calling him a misogynist. The rest is just Thunderfoot and the freethoughbloggers bitching at each other. While I agree with Thunderfoot for the most part, he does act a tad childish at times.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 04:45 AM
4

Catch more flies with honey etc.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 06:44 PM
0

Just remember that these arguments should not be discredited because you don't like them, but because no proof has been given to support them.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:41 PM
2

I don't think they're all misogyny, but some of them were pretty bad. Thank you for the links.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:06 AM
1

I think SPLC and other groups like it promote intellectual lazyness. People(looking at you A+) seem to use a stock phrase of "SPLC says its a hategroup" as an excuse to not do any actual research into the group they're opposing.
/r/MensRights27/12/12 07:16 AM
3

Could you link to some of these posts?
/r/MensRights27/12/12 07:11 AM
1

you do the same thing by pressuring men in a weak emotional / mental state into blaming their problems on circumcision. Talk about a strawman, since when have I blamed any problems on circumcision? All I'm saying is that its his body, so it should be his choice. If your happy with your circumcision fine, but not everyone will be and they deserve the option to choose for themselves. Second, a "useless piece of skin"? Sounds like you need to do some research.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:10 PM
4

it will save trouble for him later in life if he decides he wishes he were cut It'll cause him a whole lot more trouble if he wishes he weren't.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:26 AM
13

Except that circumcision is currently legal Erm yes it is, and its legality is what the debate is about. beneficial Please cite sources. Aesthetic Use that argument for any other form of infant surgery and see if your argument holds up. I don't like clitoral hoods, why can't I cut my daughter's off? If YOU like circumcised penises, feel free to get one when you are a legal adult, but making a permanent aesthetic choice for your child's penis is wrong. I was circumcised. I don't like it. Why do I…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 03:06 AM
20

If your religion violates human rights then sorry, but it's gotta happen. We don't allow human or animal sacrifices, we don't allow FGM, we don't allow other forms of mutilation, we don't allow drug use for religious purposes. I see no reason why babies' foreskin is any different. edit: And by we I mean most of the western world.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:59 AM
5

Oh look its 5 o'clock, rape time!
/r/MensRights22/12/12 07:58 AM
11

Anyone notice how its ok to show a boy being mutilated on the top of the article, but its not for a girl?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:56 AM
4

My family actually got one for christmas because everyone was curious, for us it wasn't a gender issue. Thing is cool the first few times you use it, then you realize you gotta buy expensive packets of powder to keep making stuff.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:52 AM
2

and ran her fingers on his bare torso Was she expecting to find a secret compartment inside his chest or something?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 12:45 AM
2

http://msmagazine.com/blog/blog/2010/12/09/my-little-homophobic-racist-smarts-shaming-pony/
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:49 AM
5

TIL straight white men can't be homeless.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 04:01 AM
2

Actually they're the same. The term "action figure" was first coined by Hasbro in 1964, to market their G.I. Joe figure to boys who wouldn't play with dolls (A similar toy named Johnny Hero was introduced by Rosko Industries for Sears in 1965, but was known as a "Boy's Doll" since the term action figure had not gained widespread usage at that point.). G.I. Joe was initially a military-themed 11.5-inch figure proposed by marketing and toy idea-man Stan Weston. It featured changeable clothes with …
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:03 AM
1

On the circumcision "benefits", many of the benefits they list can also be gained by just wearing a condom during sex. Not to mention none of those affects should even matter as they are not an immediate problem to an infant, contracting an STD is an adult problem so the decision should be left to the adult who owns the penis.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:03 AM
2

One of the hardest things for me to understand as a socialist is why feminism is so rampant on the left. To me, it's all about equality, so unilaterally condemning men's rights groups certainly doesn't scream 'egalitarian' to me. Probably the same way far-right religious nuts can praise Jesus for commanding giving up everything to the poor but oppose socialism.
/r/MensRights02/12/12 04:10 AM
2

Did they have any "evidence" to support their claims, or was it just a woman on stage trying to tell everyone if they don't agree with her they're sexist?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 03:12 PM
3

Photoshop makes it hard to believe anything anymore.
/r/MensRights25/11/12 10:59 PM
14

FGM is already banned in America.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 08:29 PM
16

It is like the males lose their little finger in the procedure, women lose a hand. Then why can't we stop both? There are billions of people in the world, I think society can handle more than one issue at a time. Saying one is worse doesn't negate how bad the other is.
/r/MensRights24/11/12 04:34 PM
2

I don't care about the group as much as I care about that awful photoshopping job. Look at the thumb holding up the testicles.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:47 AM
1

I feel better when my legs are shaved. Well that's why you shave then. I feel better when I shave my face, so I do it. Just because I like to do something doesn't mean society subconsciously manipulated me into doing it.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:10 AM
1

How do these get approved? I've tried to submit several definitions for words (one an attempt at a non-biased athiestism+ definition that mentioned nothing of feminism or men's rights) and they always get rejected. How on earth does a moderator approve 4 of the same definitions, especially when they're purposely hateful and untrue?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:06 AM
1

For feminists that seem so sure about their positions they sure can't handle criticism very well.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:09 AM
1

Might be a case of the Nobel Savage fallacy.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:03 AM
-6

Not really a MR's issue. One annoying woman does not misandry make. If you read the post nearly everyone is in support of the husband.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 03:45 AM
10

What I don't understand is why the cops would spend so much time and energy on something that, from what the article says, an honest mistake. They got a call, they investigated it at the park, and realized it was all a misunderstanding. Why the hell did they continue to pursue a case they know they didn't have?
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:37 PM
2

Can't comment on accuracy, but there seems to be 2 reasons why the average person doesn't seem to understand an anti-circumcision position. 1. Most people don't know about minor FGM forms like pricking, they always assume its the worst type of FGM imaginable. 2. They don't actually know what a foreskin is, so they can't compare procedures accurately. A lot of people pro-circumcision like to say "its just a little flap of skin", this should cue you that they have no idea what they're talking abou…
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:01 PM
3

radical feminist Because they're using square roots for check marks?
/r/MensRights31/10/12 01:32 PM
-4

Is genetics really that important? In a few generations they'll be so diluted anyways. I mean you're not any more related to your great great great great great grandfather than to a random person on the street. I'd think someone in the 21st century would leave spreading genes behind with ideas like chivalry, dowry, family honor, etc.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 03:30 PM
3

Because a couple of trolls represent the millions of skeptics, most who don't even know or care who Rebecca Watson is. I'm gettin' real sick of this "a couple bad apples must represent the entire community" shit. Rebecca Watson does it, PZ Myrers does it, /r/MRA does it. People are all different and are able to belong to multiple groups without representing the entire set of any of them.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 09:47 PM
11

Maybe some people just like their hair a different color and are not fond of its natural color. Besides, you're really grasping at straws here. There is so much you can criticize about Ms. Watson, but her looks shouldn't be one of them. MRA's need to rise above shameless Ad Hominems.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:24 AM
11

I learned about the skeptics back in college It's not some kind of club. It wasn’t until I started talking about feminism to skeptics that I realized I didn’t have a safe space. Maybe because the whole point of being a skeptic is to question things. It's their job to be skeptical for crying out loud, a "safe place" is the exact opposite of what skepticism is for!
/r/MensRights25/10/12 01:16 AM
2

-95 I'm pretty standard white cis middle class suburban male in America. Being gay sure does bump my privileged down a lot, which is weird because aside from marriage equality I don't really have any disadvantages. Kinda messed up that if I like women, I'm PRIVILEGED but if I like dudes all of a sudden I'm a poor oppressed victim of the patriarchy. edit: Oh its a joke...meh.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 03:35 AM
2

Does cutting excess skin really count as amputation? I think that's one of the biggest problems with circumcision in America, ignorance of what the foreskin really is.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:41 AM
3

I think your confusing the word default with the word norm (also not to be confused with normal). It's not the default to the people who weren't born cis.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 01:13 PM
0

I think you got that backwards. Discussing the subject instead of going onto personal attacks should be the main course of action. "Him vs her" won't convince anyone of anything, even if it does make both debaters feel better about themselves.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 08:49 AM
-17

But she chose to wear it, so she reaps the consequences of it. It doesn't excuse inappropriate behavior, but knowing the risks she decided to wear it anyway.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 02:48 AM
3

I wouldn't stop at SPLC but question the concept of hate groups to begin with. What constitutes a hate group? Just because a group says something you don't like doesn't make them hateful. Sure it sounds nice to put the KKK and the Westburo Baptist Church in their places, but I'm sure there many many people who'd label the Atheist Bus Campaign as a "hate group". The definition of "hate" is relative to both the group and the targets.
/r/MensRights16/10/12 09:05 PM
2

No because guys are apparently supporting this too. Men are brainwashed against their own gender, fathers have to "protect" their daughters from the evil boys.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:59 AM
2

If you read the article it says they get around this by playing the semantics game: calling themselves a "club" instead of a business, they do not have clients but instead have "paying members".
/r/MensRights14/10/12 03:56 AM
8

"Atheists are not the only oppressed religious group." Except that atheism isn't a religion. "Islam is not evil...Neither is any other religion…" Except for the ones we don't personally like. "Demanding people educate you is oppressive." lulwut. "Did you know that hijabs and niqabs are cultural? And that many women find them liberating?" Wait, so its horrible to oppress women...except when its a foreign culture and as long as some women in that culture find it okay. "Disability is not a flaw in …
/r/MensRights11/10/12 03:02 PM
2

Even if it did offer slight protection against HIV, who cares? Male circumcision has nothing to do with what women want or what makes them safe. It's about right to choose.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 01:29 PM
7

This doesn't have anything to do with Men's Rights, so I guess I'll say something that doesn't either I wouldn't have a chance to say otherwise. Just bitching: "Mom" culture is fucking annoying, I see it everywhere. Women act like they're a part of this special club. You squeezed a kid out, want a medal or something?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 08:01 AM
19

Even if not a fake, the fact that it was posted in /r/WTF means it is perceived as horrible advice to begin with. The general consensus is the advice is pretty fucked up. No real need to repost.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 05:01 AM
6

The scary thing about this site is that people let their hatred of child molesters get in the way of rationality. People will support this site without thinking of any potential consequences to the innocent. Anytime pedophilia or child molestation related topics get to the front page people flip their shit; just like when alleged rape victims take revenge on an alleged rapist people throw logic out the window with "you go girl" comments before anything has even been established. Hell just look a…
/r/MensRights05/10/12 02:37 AM
9

If the only thing PZ Myers can find wrong with /r/MRA is a post he didn't even read all the way then I guess we're doing pretty good for ourselves. I wonder why he hates us.
/r/MensRights27/09/12 09:32 PM
12

In addition to what others have said, it also is assuming that a stay-at-home position is some how feminine.
/r/MensRights26/09/12 12:56 PM
18

Not to mention its a non-sequitur. What does FGM have to do with circumcision? "Its worse than cutting off the foreskin", so fucking what? Is it okay to cut off someone's finger because "it's not as bad" as cutting their arm off? Second, the author doesn't seem to know what a foreskin is (a common problem in America). The entire outside of the penis is a little more than a "small flap of skin"
/r/MensRights26/09/12 04:11 AM
11

This post sums up what annoys me about "gamer girls". Not women who happen to enjoy video games, but women who feel the need to use their sex to bully others into conforming to their personal behavioral standards. I'm annoyed by the idea that games suddenly need to cater to an audience that shunned them for so long - reticentbias
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:18 AM
9

If you haven't I suggest you should. It's a good read and only ~100 pages long.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 04:24 PM
7

I disagree. Feminism is like christianity, there are so many different flavors of it you can't make a blanket statement about all of them. You wouldn't say all christains hate homosexuals. Not to mention its gets into "No True Scotsman" territory with this line of reasoning, there is no strict definition on what a "feminist" is.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:13 PM
3

Well I don't think that the comment has to necessarily mean genders. If you work/live in a bad part of a major city I'd advocate anyone to carry a weapon.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:21 AM
1

No I didn't read it, if it does contain a vast amount of anti-women then I apologize.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 02:31 PM
11

"Anders Breivik committed terrorist acts fueled by a hatred of women and a radical political opposition to feminism" So a crazy asshole in Norway goes on a mass murdering spree and that somehow makes a Men's Rights in Canada a hategroup? This is like saying "Hitler was a vegetarian, ergo all vegetarians are racist". "that pushed both men to pick up a gun and shoot women" Oh so the men who died by their hands had it coming. Not ONLY that, but that he was on a killing spree because he hated women …
/r/MensRights16/09/12 07:02 AM
10

Everytime circumcision comes up on reddit it makes me want to quit the site all together due to the community not being as rational as I thought they were. So much dumbassery in one place. One second reddit will bash religion as "irrational", and the next defends mutilating children's penises...
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:16 AM
3

Don't get me wrong this is horrible, but this is 2 years old.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:07 AM
2

At times he can be real arrogant.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 03:11 AM
11

I've been waiting so long to post think link. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/ "...traditional ethics overrates culturally masculine traits like 'independence, autonomy, intellect, will, wariness, hierarchy, domination, culture, transcendence, product, asceticism, war, and death,'" You heard it here folks, straight from the horses mouth. Intellect is a "masculine trait".
/r/MensRights11/09/12 05:08 AM
1

Yes, and in addition if all "pedophiles" were to receive this type of treatment, there would be a "pedophile" witch hunt were many (more) innocent people could be abused by manipulation of the law. (Ex. An 18 year old male has sex with 17 year old girlfriend, girlfriend's parents find out, male is now forced to take castration medication)
/r/MensRights09/09/12 07:16 AM
1

First post on their "Principle Topics" section. "Please, please tell me that we are not going to take this sort of thing [anti-men,white,straight discrimination, etc] seriously as a movement. I came here to get away from privilege-denying and pretending that "all prejudice is equal." I came here to empower folks who are oppressed on a systematic level - women, people of color, trans folks, queers, disabled folks, poor people." Edit: I've read more of the the thread. Lots of cringe worthy stuff, …
/r/MensRights09/09/12 05:08 AM
7

" they can’t handle the avalanche of hatred they get from skeptics and atheists when they publicly promote a feminist agenda" See this is what I can't stand about her. Not all atheists and skeptics share your view points. Everyone is either with her or against her.
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:59 PM
9

Can we please not politicize assholes being assholes?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 03:24 AM
1

This is just too perfect not to be a joke/troll.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 01:14 AM
37

she didn't look hurt she was with a friend of somesort her clothes looked like they'd ever been pulled off she wasn't sobbing until the camera was on a good 7 seconds she lied about having a cell phone she claimed she was being held against her will even when she was right next to an unlocked door she cleared up the water works when she walked out the door but immediately started up again when the guy from the stairwell entered -the man with the hat who was with her was half-smiling the whole ti…
/r/MensRights04/09/12 09:53 PM
1

Thanks.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 03:31 AM
1

No doubt porn can be a dangerous business, but I mean this in the least condescending way possible: do you have sources for your claims? Specifically "people who go into porn are regularly (if not uniformly) victims of child sexual abuse" and " most actresses and gay actors deal with rectal prolapse".
/r/MensRights03/09/12 05:32 PM
0

I don't see whats wrong with "nasty porn" as long as the viewers realize its fantasy. I like slasher movies but I would never condone a guy in a mask actually killing people in horrible ways. To each their own.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:58 AM
3

At around 12m she says "There isn't much rape in mainstream porn, because women say yes to everything"...Well it wouldn't be much of a porno if the pornstar denied and everyone went about their day would it?
/r/MensRights02/09/12 04:19 AM
1

To be fair, they did at least have this: http://imgur.com/a/a72z5#51
/r/MensRights29/08/12 08:18 PM
2

She's going with the "Eric Cartman" business model it seems.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 05:19 AM
11

Don't condom's rectify all of that though? Why not just teach kids to wear condoms instead of removing entire parts of their penis...
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:07 PM
1

Well, in that case we seem to agree with each other.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:51 AM
2

"How are you supposed to be a married couple if the spouses concerns are dismissed" Well that is up to the people involved, not the law. If someone's spouse feels like they can make a child or abort a fetus without the others consent, then maybe the two shouldn't be married. Again, personal relationships should be of no concern to the government.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 03:40 AM
11

I disagree. Reproductive rights and rights of a persons' body should not be limited to "promote healthy marriages".
/r/MensRights26/08/12 05:29 PM
8

TL;DR "As a result of male privilege, the objectification of women in society is far more damaging than any objectification of men. "
/r/MensRights18/08/12 04:14 PM
6

"I really wonder how many people actually protect rapists and say that the rapist should be able to rape women because it was always the women's fault." This. I hear from people all the time "Ya know, they ALWAYS blame the victim, women are never believed when they say they were raped". Who the fuck blames the rape victim? Who is "they" if everyone tells me that everyone else are the ones doing it? People just seem to accept "rape culture" as being a dominant attitude in our society without thin…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 07:44 AM
3

Not to mention an unflattering argument for those of us who don't believe in an Abrahamic religion.
/r/MensRights13/08/12 07:56 AM
3

Except most of the time the person having their foreskin removed aren't "elect[ing]" but rather are having it forced upon them. An entire industry exists around cutting off parts of a babies penis to use for cosmetics. Does this not disturb you?
/r/MensRights12/08/12 04:19 AM
28

That's like saying your glad you had your fingernails removed so now they won't get dirt under them...
/r/MensRights06/08/12 03:38 AM
2

Yeah, way to salt the wound. Not my fault I'm circumcised. :(
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:56 AM
3

I like the combination of German and French there.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 07:08 AM
1

That woman's expression in the picture is hilarious.
/r/MensRights17/07/12 07:51 AM
4

So the court isn't stopping this because its wrong, but because the mother (who, from the article portrays, doesn't have any legal custody son anymore) should get a say?
/r/MensRights14/07/12 02:53 PM
16

Well, MGM is circumcision, by definition. Latin circum=circular cision=cut. Though I agree that to most people "circumcision" sounds much more medical and routine than "mutilation", and might give people the wrong idea.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 07:19 AM
9

I'm guessing he thought she'd act like an adult and not a 2 year old fighting over a toy.
/r/MensRights12/06/12 03:49 AM
1

I like how she listed intellect as "culturally masculine".
/r/MensRights08/06/12 03:14 PM
-1

I'd be more concerned that my partner violated my trust than if it was "my" child. If you raise a child to adulthood then its yours, I don't think it should matter whose child it "really is". Besides, in less than 5 generations barely any of your genes are going to even matter. Every child of your child will be 1/2 less related to you, so you'd only be .0315 related to your great great great great grandkid. (Please correct me if I'm wrong)
/r/MensRights07/06/12 04:27 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter