TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iburiedmyshovel Archive

View 6 posts and 145 comments by iburiedmyshovel on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
126

Holy shit, that's a perfectly normal haircut. This is full on crazy.
/r/MensRights10/10/24 01:14 AM
3

Introducing women to those spaces doesn't automatically address the issue. Nuns in the catholic church, Maxine Ghaswell, rapist teachers that are portrayed as over empathetic instead of predators... all examples of women who will also abide by or contribute to rape and sexual assault. Pretending like adding a woman into the mix is an automatic solution is silly. Using sexual assault as a tool to dismantle male spaces is disingenuous at best. Particularly when the evident culprit is religion. Whi…
/r/MensRights07/10/24 08:45 PM
4

It was the tangential context that brought me to make this post, so I appreciate the willingness of the community to engage with it. Particularly considering that the very community it should be discussed within would silence and ban me for it. It's another reason spaces like this are critical - the intra-dimensional nature of specific identities allows for the discussion of one within the other. Without this space, I wouldn't even be allowed to address the topic. I don't try to focus on gay iss…
/r/MensRights07/10/24 01:58 AM
-1

I think you meant "female spaces" at the end, there, unless I'm mistaken. The drive to permit access is a holdover from a legitimate need to access spaces that were designed to disenfranchise women. A belief that any limitation to access is an inherent act of disenfranchisement. That's really the crux of this whole conversation. To move forward, we need to acknowledge the legitimacy of that need while not conceding the right and value of male spaces, contextually.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 03:26 PM
3

You make fair points. I feel like I did make clear my regard for progressive ideology as a whole and briefly mentioned historical context on the outset of the post. But I get what you're saying regarding optics when taking my position acutely. Like with all political movements, it feels like the pendulum has swung too far back. I say gatekeeping isn't a dirty word because it's an inherent necessity. It's a reference to gated communities, which are gated for the protection of the community. A com…
/r/MensRights06/10/24 02:40 PM
-37

The point remains as a legitimate rebuttle to the idea that we're living in a matriarchy. I've no interest in discussing the details regarding the degree or breadth of harm therein, at least in the context of this conversation (although I do think it's a topic worthy of discussion).
/r/MensRights06/10/24 03:47 AM
-59

Mmm I'd say you're half right. I mean, women literally just lost the right to abortion and are dying because of it. So pull back on that whole "women are in control" thing. It simply isn't true. On the other hand, the issue is that in spaces where women are gaining or have power/control, they're using it as a way to diminish men. Try not to talk in absolutes, because you have valid points, but they'll be dismissed if you can't express them with nuance and complexity and a more accurate view of r…
/r/MensRights06/10/24 03:37 AM
2

It's how they feel like they're doing something important and "fighting for the cause," when the reality is they're a useless sack of shit who isn't capable of contributing anything of real value. But being that they have no actual self worth, they have to fabricate it by playing internet dictator.
/r/MensRights06/10/24 02:21 AM
2

Reddit moderation is an absolute joke and is the single biggest factor that's caused this website to become the dumpster fire it's become. When you couple that with restrictions based on radical leftism from reddit admins themselves, we've lost the place for free exchange of thoughts and ideas and conversations and are left with a cesspool of self-congratulatory virtue signallers. I was permanently banned from my city's subreddit (presumably) because I deigned to acknowledge our crime problem is…
/r/MensRights06/10/24 02:15 AM
1

Yes, that was a proverbial "you." People who need dripping sarcasm/satire spelled out for them with a tag should read more and comment less.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 01:24 AM
2

No, you don't have to do this. People with that pisspoor of a critical reading skill have no business commenting. Fuck that. I'm tired of everyone thinking people need to dumb down to the lowest common denominator; like, no, you need to get an education. Christ. You're definitely not wrong.
/r/MensRights16/09/24 01:21 AM
1

Also, if you don't think Vance is the most qualified, explain to me why he isn't a "White Supremacy Hire."
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:16 PM
1

So you're saying that personal preference is irrelevant. There is a particular line of "qualified" for the position. Anything beyond that is a matter of subjectivity. I submit that if Pence and Vance meet that objective level, then so does Harris. It isn't just a matter of time served and experience and points you plot on paper. It's a matter of personality and ideology and charisma and adaptability and a whole load of other factors. That's why people have to interview for a job. It isn't simply…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 06:09 PM
1

What if I said JD Vance was just a WMI hire - white male inclusion? Could you refute that? Could you prove he wasn't selected above others because of his identity? Could you prove that isn't the criteria that the Trump campaign screened for?
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:58 PM
1

It wasn't nonsensical. It was all examples of people who were either or both unqualified for their position and "diverse." Yet are never denounced as "DEI." Explain to me why she is less qualified than Mike Pence or JD Vance and you'll have a leg to stand on.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:51 PM
-1

The right is actively against adoption for gay people, for one. There are extremists who are looking to illegalize IVF. They actively fight against workers rights, including unions, which also means maternity and paternity leave, on top of middle class household income. While raising taxes on the same. They work to cut welfare spending, which largely supports families, not just individuals. They oppose universal Healthcare. Pregnancy can result in extreme costs without insurance. So while they a…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:36 PM
0

If you think Harris is "DEI" then you're an idiot. Where's your law degree, hmm? It's funny that people like MTG and Boebert are never called "DEI" even though they're certifiable fucking idiots. Was Trump's family "DEI" hires, considering they had no experience and no right to be in the positions he placed them? Was Melania a "DEI" first lady, considering she was Trumps third pick? What about Ted Cruz? You know, the latino Canadian that cuckolded himself to Trump? Is he a "DEI" hire? I'm just t…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 05:21 PM
0

Well I suppose you saw my response, from the immediate downvote. You know you're wrong but you can't handle it. You need to stop thinking that being a conservative/republican is part of your identity. It's why politics is such a divisive topic. It's just like religion. The amygdala activates and you go into fight or flight. It's okay to be wrong. It's okay to change your mind. It doesn't say anything about you, except that you're enlightened enough to grow as a person. If you presented a point t…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:54 PM
1

OK Regarding war, it was Biden that brought our troops home from Afghanistan, not Trump. It was George W. that supported falsified Intel that led to the war in Iraq. So check your facts. It was Republicans who shut down mental health facilities. It's Republicans who fight against universal health care. It's Republicans who deny science regarding Healthcare. And it's Republicans trying to demonize Healthcare leaders. Obligatory and financial abortion is a core men's rights issue. If women have th…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:43 PM
-1

What are you talking about regarding Ukraine? They're being invaded, they have to fight. And dems are the ones supporting armaments. Not supporting universal Healthcare is inherently against Healthcare. If you lose your job, you shouldn't lose your Healthcare. Full stop. Furthermore, it isn't the Dems obfuscating vaccines with danger and false adverse effects like autism. It wasn't the Dems who shutdown mental Healthcare facilities. It isn't Dems advocating for harsher prison sentences in place …
/r/MensRights08/08/24 04:24 PM
-4

It just pisses me off. Don't pretend to care about men's rights when all you care about is hating feminism. It's toxic to the cause, and it makes it that much harder for us to make actual progress. If your view in men's rights is focused on women, then maybe you don't care about men. Maybe it's a you problem, not an us problem.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 03:15 AM
-9

Bullshit. What party loves to send men to die in war? What party is against Healthcare and particularly mental health care, despite the prevalent suicide rate in men? What party denies abortion, forcing not only women into birth, but men into 18 years of payments? What party refuses gun control, despite men being by far the largest victims of gun violence? What party criminalizes homelessness, when the vast majority of the homeless are men? I could go on and on. Fuck this trash piece and your bu…
/r/MensRights08/08/24 01:50 AM
8

I was at a bar last night that had women only specials and I'm just like... really? In this day and age? Like, it wasn't even that type of place. It was a residential house converted into a bar that was pretending to be a club. It was weird. Actually cool vibes though lol But seriously. As a gay man it just feels unwelcoming because attracting ladies there doesn't do anything for me. I don't reap the supposed benefit but have to pay the price.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:34 AM
1

This sub has really gone to crap over the years. What a shame.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 08:00 AM
10

The rebuttle is false. It isn't because of the gasp patriarchy advocating men's sports. It's because men compete at a higher level and also women have less interest in sports. Women that do take an interest choose to view them at the higher level, popularly, as well. In fact, if the gasp terrible patriarchy didn't take an active interest in supporting women's sports, most women's leagues wouldn't even exist.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:25 PM
13

The dictionary definition is pretty clear. I'll never understand this whole debate. The whole "transwomen are women" thing will never make sense. Transwomen are transwomen. You don't have to deny reality in order to believe they should be treated with respect and dignity. And that doesn't mean you have to believe that they have a right to protected spaces of natural women. There's complexity and nuance to the topic. If you want to frame the conversation in a way that defies reality from the star…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 05:17 PM
3

I'm a gay man, as well, and this would be my approach: I would avoid contact with her as much as possible. In class/group settings, if contact can't be avoided, I would be cold and ignore her. If I had to address her, I would be as aggressive as possible without crossing the line. She knows what she did. I would push it until she acknowledged it. She would treat me with enough respect to at least own up to it and address, or she would be treated with absolutely zero respect in return. I would ma…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 04:55 PM
13

It was your opinion that a woman should carry a pregnancy for 9 months because you performed the work of coming inside her that she found repugnant. And she wasn't wrong. If you want equality, you should support the right of men to legally abort, not the opposite.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 05:37 AM
-1

This op is a fucking idiot. It's no wonder people reject this sub. I've been here for 8 years. It's just gotten progressively worse. Fucking snowflake mentality, can't even recognize the difference between propaganda and critique. It's sad.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:33 PM
2

The authority in charge that confronts her routinely is her headmistress. Her Mary Sue persona turns false at every bend. She loses in fencing. She makes wrong accusation after wrong accusation. She constantly fucks up because of her arrogance. You didn't watch it for whatever reason. But there's too many people in this sub that can't withstand media that they're inherently critical on to form fully informed and educated opinions. Kind of like the backlash people who mingle with mensrights face.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:27 PM
1

I can't help but take issue with "not having an openly gay man is a step in the right direction." I mean I think you're coming from a good place. But that phrasing isn't great. I agree in the sense that I don't want to see token gay characters, and I don't want to see gay people constantly portrayed as victims, either. I was just lamenting to my friend the other day that I finally decided to engage with gay media after largely ignoring it for pretty much all of my adulthood, and damn is that shi…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:18 PM
5

...how do you not realize the critique on feminism? Wednesday is an abrasive character that fixates on her ideology and judgement. Relaxing on that is a major part of her character arc. Her "white knight" criticism after having her life saved is clearly a defense mechanism. It's an overtly wrong judgement, and thereby a critique of modern feminism. Likewise, the bee guy is a super cringe character that can't get a date. He insists on pursuing someone that is definitively not interested. His "fem…
/r/MensRights10/12/22 10:04 PM
8

To be clear, this isn't just women. Men have the exact same feeling (at least classically). Fortunately, at least in my experience, society has come around so much. Most of the men in my life are extremely accepting, not simply tolerant. It's something I never thought I would experience coming of age. But still, this is a product of her specific society and also not untrue of many men, and especially untrue of men in history. Ultimately, the vast majority of my friends are women. I've always sai…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:12 AM
1

This is so asinine. As a gay man and believer in men's rights. Just no. Stop trying to co-opt my community. There's already enough dilusion with the inclusivity of trans people (as trans has nothing to do with homosexuality, our goals and rights are not intrinsically aligned). That's opened the gates to the "plus," which has only further diluted and diminished the community. Asexuality has nothing to do with LGB. Literally, that's the whole point of it. Non binary has only served to entrench gen…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 05:17 PM
4

I wonder what the response would be if his little diatribe was "women are weak." Women are weak. It's true. Look at the statistics. Women make up the majority of rape victims because they can't protect themselves. If you look at history, women didn't get the right to vote until modern society because men finally gave it to them. That's in part due to evolution, but only part. Women. Are. Weak. Yea, I'm sure that'd go over real well. Really no different from what he said. The same complexity, the…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:19 PM
1

What an ignorant, reductionist take. He has absolutely no business spouting off his misandrist opinions without room for discourse or more wholisitic dialogue. He makes one statement of fact with a generic statistic and then makes a vague, unbacked claim about evolution. Why not talk about the nature of testosterone, as one student pointed out? He seems to dismiss it as if his singular point is that men are just inherently bad. He doesn't mention that while men are more violent by nature, that t…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 03:03 PM
1

Soooo... Let me admit where I'm wrong first. I did misread the transcript and thought it was the interviewer instigating the dexter shit. That really is beyond the pail. So I understand the anger and I've reactively humbled myself. Still, let me explain myself further. One, I have my back up because of things I've already explained. There's plenty wrong with the school system and a lot of it comes from the conservative side. Two, and this is a new point, but I know this was released some time ag…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 08:03 PM
1

It couldn't possibly be the interviewer was leading and imposed that ideology and that respondent just agreed for the sake of not causing a social faux pas? No, never do people agree with absurdist ideals for the sake of ease. She must be a blood thirsty psychopath. That's why entrapment is totally legal, of course. Lol
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:36 PM
1

To be clear, I'm not advocating for any of those things. I just think it's telling that they've been going on for years and are particularly prominent in the past few, but when it's from "the other side" it's all of a sudden a problem. This sub keeps quiet through religious school indoctrination. It keeps its mouth shut about little boys being raped and abused in "alternative" schools and catholic churches and schools. It says nothing when gay people are under attack. But a butch lesbian express…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:28 PM
0

Death? She called out for death? Holy shit, are you sure your aren't a feminist with that huge stretch and victim complex?
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:11 PM
1

Hold on, when did she say murder? I read the article over and over. Never did she say murder, nor imply it.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:07 PM
1

She never said she wanted to murder anyone. You were sounding reasonable, don't give in to bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:06 PM
1

She said when she first started in school. As in she had to hide who she was to be accepted. I.e. the plight of the gay person.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 07:05 PM
-9

So it's okay when Republicans legislate their agenda for public schools (in God we trust, don't say gay, book bans, etc.), it's okay for private religious schools to indoctrinate their religious and homophobic beliefs, but a left leaning private school?!? Now that's just crossing the line. Gtfo here. This has shitall to do with the sub and it's a really hypocritical, shitty talking point.
/r/MensRights02/09/22 03:55 PM
1

u/effective_chip743 I don't know if this is truly your stance, but if it is, you should know that feminists subs do indeed ban mra subbers. Sometimes it's after a comment is made and the subbers post history is reviewed, other times it's done automatically/preemptively without ever having even made a post in that sub. Just so you know it's one of the challenges the movement faces. u/mindset_grindset I would assume good faith until proven otherwise. So I guess all we can do is see.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 07:45 AM
2

I honestly think voices like yours are critical to our movement. As far as I'm concerned, you're a welcome ally. Please don't let the groupthink or vocal extremes deter you from giving your support where it's sorely needed. If it makes you feel better, I've had to do the same from time to time advocating for women's rights and LGBT rights. Justice isn't black or white and all or nothing. You can still be an ally and voice dissent. In fact, I think it's critical that you do.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:42 AM
0

If we can't be self critical then we are bound for failure. Look at the current state of the LGBT movement. The extremists have taken it over, gay men no longer have a place. r/LGBT is basically a trans only space where any sort of dissent is immediately silenced and banned. If we aren't self aware and self critical, the extremists will take over and run it into the ground. It's critical we're open to dissenting feedback for our own progress. Not only for the sake of moderation, but also to garn…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:39 AM
37

This is why I get so confused by gay men advocating for feminism. I certainly advocate for women's rights, but I'm absolutely against feminism as a movement. Society inherently views gay men as worthless. Which is still better than the demonization we've suffered for the past several decades. But men's rights are gay rights. The intersectionality is innate.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:33 AM
4

For the record, I think your response is fair and valid. Sorry you weren't met with a more objective response here. I don't really know any mgtow people myself, so I can't speak anecdotally. Just know not everyone who believes in men's rights feels the same. Over time, the movement has attracted a more vitriolic subset, particularly with the extremes getting shutdown. Which has pushed away more moderate voices. It's part of the problem of heavy moderation. I hope you continue to keep an open min…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 05:29 AM
2

Obviously I mansplained the facts to her which was so traumatizing she just couldn't even acknowledge it
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:47 PM
8

The thread was fine when it was non gendered. The practice was clearly, objectively wrong. It should've been overt that that basically meant little boys were being subject to violence by the system. Instead someone had to make it about females. Because everything wrong with society has to do with misogyny, duh. When explicitly proven that that violence was gendered against males, smoke We didn't even get to the part where females are the main perpetrators of that violence. Would love to see how …
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:32 PM
21

Tl;dr: I refuted a comment regarding corporal punishment on students that disingenuously selected a study that made out that females were the greater victim. I was rebuttled. I provided evidence proving that rebuttle wrong. That respondent wholly ignored that refute in total hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 10:08 PM
6

But that's also not true, in that she doesn't have to either. Men don't have the option. But she could use a surrogate. She's choosing to do it herself rather than pay someone else. It's likely I will never be a father because I'm gay and don't have the financial means. Women can choose to do it themselves. Or they can use a third party. It's a privilege of their sex. It's crazy to try and frame that privilege as a societal burden. That isn't to say that that privilege itself isn't a burden - me…
/r/MensRights15/08/22 08:09 PM
2

This is silly. She's saying representation is important, particularly for women right now (considering the context of Roe), and even though there may be men who will advocate for women, it isn't as impactful to women audiences. She says this in the context of late night talk shows which are predominately hosted by white men (Kimmel, Myers, Colbert, Fallon, Corden) hence the infusion of race (it highlights the homogeneity) I'm really not sure why this sub is so ready to take offense to that. This…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 10:32 AM
11

I just read up on him and apparently everyone was in agreement about the abuse during her trial. Both the prosecution and defense sides conceded that he had demonstrated a history of abuse toward her and that this abuse created a context for the assault. He later went on to batter his new spouse. Don't get me wrong, I've been subbed here for years and years. But this guy is not part of the cause. No one should be subjected to bodily mutilation. But he definitely wasn't innocent. And apparently h…
/r/MensRights03/02/21 02:56 PM
6

Men's rights isn't left versus right. If you want to make it political, we can talk about how the right has supported the systemic rape of boys and their subsequent coverups by championing organized Christianity, or the magnitude of death caused from warmongering that relies on male disposability, or the refusal to support those who do survive war with the appropriate social programs and veterans benefits that contributes significantly to male suicide, or the "tough on crime" mantra that not onl…
/r/MensRights15/09/19 03:13 PM
2

You know, MGTOW has never really felt odd to me, because I've pretty much been living that life since I came out. I've never centered my life around a relationship, or chasing one, and it's more foreign for me to understand that opposing lifestyle. Being gay, at least for me, has meant learning to live for myself, and finding relationships only in an additive or complementary sense. I think MGTOW suffers from similar issues as the gay community, in that there's a hyper-centralism that occurs on …
/r/MensRights29/03/19 01:15 AM
3

That's what i figured. It was a joke between friends that someone decided to insert himself in. Fuck that guy. (i hope you did check in with your friend later, on a serious level.)
/r/MensRights07/03/19 08:46 PM
5

He saw you invalidating her needs/feelings, so he did the same to you in return. Instead of just sticking up for her, though, he tried an Appeal to Authority of victimhood, because gay people like that crave attention, whether it be negative or positive (coming from a gay person). It's why he inserted himself in the first place. Just ignore him. Edit: by the way, that's the difference between men and women. Women take the time to exercise "self-care," men just suck it up until they get through o…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 08:31 PM
2

Doesn't really have a marketing flair, does it, "gay male prostitutes?" No, no, no, "Welcome to Cockbusters, we have a great selection of rentboys for you to take home." Much better.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 08:10 PM
1

Ok, sure, but the original point was in specific regards to the phrase "Masc4Masc" and the rejection of effeminate men with the intent of attraction. So you've branched it out into something tangential, and then reversed your tenuous conclusions, rather than looking at it, in and of itself. It's really reaching. Again, this is the point OP was making, in trying to force attraction on people, then denigrating them, rather than just accepting it. In your last comment, I'd agree - that guy does hav…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 08:03 PM
1

Sure, but you're missing the point that the barrier is sexual attraction - you can't just disregard it. Or are your advocating that people have a duty to date outside of their attraction to see if one eventually develops? When you see these tropic taglines, it's typically in the context of hooking up, not dating. So I'm not even sure why you think any of what you said applies. OP spoke of dating, but dating starts with attraction. No one calls a woman self-hating or pressured by society because …
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:24 PM
2

The vast majority of gay people seem indifferent to monogamy. Promiscuity is the norm (gays invented grindr long before tinder was a thing, and before that there was manhunt, and before that bathhouses), so open relationships have also become the norm. Wanting a monogamous relationship both romantically and sexually is deviant. Anecdotally, I lost my virginity in a threesome with a long-time couple (before marriage equality was nationally enacted), have had sex with another married couple, then …
/r/MensRights02/03/19 05:14 PM
1

That's a really sweeping yet complex judgment on something that seems really straight forward to me. By that logic, men are gay because of subconscious misogyny, and I noped out of the last hookup I (would've) had because I have some internalized hatred for femininity linked to high pitched voices, not because he sounded like a representative from the lollipop guild. Who is anyone to condemn someone for the choices that they make on who they choose to consensually fuck? Sure, take issue with the…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 04:43 PM
8

Cockbusters
/r/MensRights02/03/19 03:34 PM
3

I know the SPLC sometimes misses the mark, and i don't like identity politics, but that article did nothing to prove anything against them except what it concluded. I imagine any of those groups specifically mentioned in the article would be much better candidates for the list. Mensrights isn't r/conservatism
/r/MensRights02/03/19 02:01 PM
3

I think it's more a way of saying "i don't act overtly and intentionally effeminate and im attracted to those who do not as well," because feminine gays have taken the identity of the group and not everyone wants to fuck a walking pride parade in a skirt. But thanks for being a prime example of what OP was referring to.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:57 PM
35

Someone you can rent to fuck.
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:40 PM
5

Preach! You like dudes because you like dudes but you're supposed like dudes who don't act like dudes. I didn't go through all the years of self-rejection/shame/hate/acceptance just so that I could feign attraction to people so I could stop feigning attraction to people. Seeing stuff like "no blacks" does really bother me (although I mostly let go of grindr years ago so I'm pretty isolated), but then again, the same principle applies - it's a hookup app, not a dating service. You can't tell peop…
/r/MensRights02/03/19 12:39 PM
3

You would think the fact that he is married to a man would refute that claim.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 11:54 AM
6

I liked that it considered the perspective and lived experience of men, but at the same time hated how it prescribed a propensity for sexual misconduct across the entire gender. I'd agree that male sexuality is generally more aggressive, insatiable, and seeking in its nature. But I don't think we need to teach men that their sexuality is a "monstrosity" - it rings of "teach men not to rape." I like the first sentence of his closing let’s start with a basic understanding that masculinity is a sub…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:52 PM
2

But that isn't a practical solution. Pedophiles aren't stepping forward and submitting to therapy, generally speaking. If feminists truly wanted to reduce rape, they would advocate for legal prostitution/brothels, which have been proven to achieve that goal. In part feminists do, but for the sake of sex workers, however, not to address rape. And the movement is split on supporting it or opposing it. That would be the practical version of "teach men not to rape."
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:34 PM
2

Of course it works, because it's a practical solution. I just get frustrated with feminists pontificating the power of women while simultaneously rejecting their agency. They believe that because rapes shouldn't occur, women shouldn't take any measure of personal accountability, because that would suggest enabling rape culture. Instead, men, as a sex, need simply be educated, collectively. The comparison is made to show the absurdity of dismissing a practical approach in favor of an ideological,…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 05:23 PM
3

I understand. You have to use it in the context of the example i gave to be most effective, i suppose. It isn't good at dismissing the sexist condemnation of all men being potential rapists, but rather serves to illustrate the ludicracy of turning rape into a problem with a gendered solution. It works to negate the onus of men being responsible for stopping rape. The implication that men are all rapists is already there; refuting that is a different aspect. The phrase is basically two points, "t…
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:11 PM
1

I didn't have time to explain earlier, but I'm home from work, so here goes... First, I do take issue with false rape accusations, in and of themselves. It should be glaringly obvious since I posted the article. Regarding the "cause no harm" perspective mistakenly foisted upon me, let me quote myself: These men, on the other hand, are now perpetual victims of feminists, who will hold them accountable for a crime they didn't commit, likely ruining their careers and public image. Just yesterday I …
/r/MensRights15/04/18 10:43 AM
27

Sometimes it is for attention, like the Columbia mattress girl. And in those cases civil suits of defamation are justified. I would support misuse of government services (whatever the legal jargon equivalent may be) as criminal charges. There are likely others that apply. But there would have to be a high burden of proof, because I do think it's important actual rape victims can come forward. On the other hand, I don't think this is one of those instances. From the research I gathered, it seems …
/r/MensRights14/04/18 12:22 PM
15

described by a prosecutor as a 'stud' Can you imagine if a prosecutor described a 14 year old female rape victim as a "bombshell"? Absolutely appalling. I'm surprised at the guilty verdict.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 11:35 AM
11

Additional links: https://www.her.ie/news/anatomy-night-read-messages-sent-jackson-olding-mciiroy-harrison-396189 https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/mar/28/irish-rugby-stars-paddy-jackson-and-stuart-olding-cleared-rape McVeigh said: “It is our belief that the investigation has been characterised by the turning of a blind eye to inadequacies in the evidence of the complainant combined with the very apparent investigative bias.” The solicitor also criticised the way the prosecution had “made…
/r/MensRights14/04/18 10:06 AM
1

No, this was completely inappropriate for 8th graders. I just wanted to point out that the response to the content itself was misguided.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 07:18 PM
0

Yea I hear you. Absolutes are never accurate. But you get the gist.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 03:42 AM
12

How did you get that from my statement, and how is that all you took away? The state is a tool to be used by the people. As a democratic republic, the state is what we make of it.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:45 PM
-6

"White privilege" is simply about not facing racial bias and discrimination. Unfortunately, SJWs like to conflate it with wealth privilege. This test, however, recognizes that the barriers against minorities and the barriers against the poor are two separate entities (despite their common overlap). I work in a salaried job. My family and I have never lived below the poverty line. I don’t have any student loans. I have never gone to bed hungry. I have never been homeless. My parents pay some of m…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:41 PM
11

I'm a leftist and I want the state as far away from children as possible. Children who go through the state system come out broken. CPS often fails children who do need them. I'm for public schools, but conservatives seem hell-bent on destroying that system - directly counter to your own narrative (it's a fact that republican states suffer from worse public education, particularly the midwest and south, and that they're intent on replacing science with religion). And we all know what the court s…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:24 PM
-1

I don't get how you can get that message. The idea is that these traits/backgrounds are specifically beneficial to those they apply to, hence privilege. You're looking at it from a mindset of oppression olympics. The implication is, in fact, that coming from a broken family is the problem, yet people from intact families often assume their situation to be the norm and don't consider the negative impact divorce has on children. The purpose is to make people consider the struggles of those who com…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 11:14 PM
-1

My point wasn't misrepresentation. I used "all" because the phrase "calling women" could be interpreted to mean "calling specific women" or "calling a group of women." He was referring to women, collectively, so "all" was an appropriate way of delineating that. I didn't quote him as saying "all," nor did I imply the absolute definition. The collective definition of "all" is what I intended, and within the context of the conversation, with his comment being readily available, immediately prior to…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 07:18 AM
-2

Calling all women, collectively, "jealous frustrated bitches" is absolutely demeaning (V. -cause a severe loss in the dignity of and respect for (someone or something)) - literally, by definition, regardless of how you would personally describe it. All that means is that you have some ingrained misogyny that prevents you from recognizing it. Trying to explain the behavior of an entire gender, as one autonomous body, through a single lense of bullshit psychology, is the exact opposite of humble. …
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:22 AM
1

I was having a well thought and civil discussion with someone who can string more than three words together to make a sentence. That person wasn't you. This is really the MRM now? Supporting the exact same behavior we denigrate feminists over? Insults instead of discourse?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:02 AM
-1

[EDIT: Warning...it's a long one! Once I started, I couldn't stop. Watching the video again and again has really given me a pretty passionate dislike for this whiney little cuck prick. Also, if you watch the video again, imagine the man as a feminist - see the similarities in the refusal of reality, truth by anecdote, illogical arguments, ignorance of the point, disproportionate, inappropriate outrage, the control through voice level, the disrespect, the refusal to listen, demand to leave after …
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:41 AM
3

You do realize when you demean an entire gender, your opinion can't be considered humble?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:55 AM
1

It wasn't a legitimate question. "That's not even accurate. Because if you can't have a basis for where the number's coming from, and what the situation is...that...that puts them in that situation. Are they more likely to be in this situation than someone that's not transgendered? Which I don't know what that is, I'm just sayin'. My wife has never been a part of police violence. Most of the people that I know have never been - accused the police of violence. So I guess I don't get where that st…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:46 AM
-4

Saying someone doesn't understand something because of their "white male privilege" isn't an insult. His reaction was totally overblown. If he felt her response held no legitimacy, why would he validate it by then flying off the handle? Was he triggered? To be clear, I hate the use of the word "privilege," as a catch all to describe the isolated viewpoint of a particular group. Because that is what its use is intended to describe - the living experience of a particular category of people. Many o…
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:07 AM
2

It's evidently the first. It's presented that way because, as I stated, there's a cultural, cognitive bias to dismiss the plight of men. Because the severity of breast cancer is immutable in first world minds, using it as a baseline for comparison denies the ingrained urge to downplay the severity of its male counterpart. It uses the established concern for breast cancer as a means of denying the apathy that comes with addressing harm to men, as a result of male disposability. The only reason to…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:24 PM
4

It really doesn't, unless you have a victim complex. Any time MRA's compare gendered statistics, it's an effort to seek equality in recognition of the issue. When women's issues are voiced, there is often an unquestionable legitimacy given to their concern, regardless of the actual breadth or depth of the impact. Men's issues, on the other hand, require unerring evidence, while being met with immediate, universal skepticism, to outright dismissal. This is a result of feminist culture, that attem…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:42 PM
3

Wear "dressier" clothes instead of more casual clothes, given the opportunity. If you over-dress, you'll look silly, just like if you under-dress. But some social circumstances allow for a range of dress level. Better dressed people tend to opt for the upper end of that range.
/r/MensRights15/10/17 09:16 PM
1

Its mostly fit. Straight guys don't seem to understand how clothes are supposed to fit their body, or they just don't care. Aside from that, matching designs, nicer materials, tendency to dress up instead of down, and accessorizing. Edit: I should mention "matching designs" doesn't mean over-matching, like a tracksuit does. It means knowing what patterns and styles work with others. I saw a girl wearing a spiked bracelet with a pastel red/blue plaid button up yesterday. She probably thought she …
/r/MensRights15/10/17 07:17 PM
1

I understand. I'm on the fence, here. If it was a woman, I think the level of direct, personal involvement would've been widely condemned, used as an example of toxic masculinity in the patriarchy. But then again, he was receptive to the attention. If a woman was receptive, as well, then I think they would be saying she asked for the exposure - although it's just as likely they'd claim the same as if she hadn't - harassment, victimhood, objectivism, etc.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 03:13 AM
2

Very clever. Poster child for the worst of this community.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 03:06 AM
3

This is absurd. The guy made these comments 4 and 6 years ago. One was an off-color joke, that while inappropriate for a public statement, was something he only copied, and made with the expectation that it wasn't going to be analyzed by the general public. The other wasn't even anti-semitic, but rather was an exaggerated expression of rage against "stupid people." He's being burned at the altar of the PC police. While I don't really see this as a "men's rights" issue, I do believe he's being un…
/r/MensRights18/09/17 12:42 AM
1

Those specific judges don't matter in the context of denouncing the original comment; I was saying that the mistake the parent comment made between the two city spellings, and the subsequent list of magistrates, was largely irrelevant to proving the main point that OP (of the sub-thread, i.e. you) was wrong in making their statement. You didn't even bother to read the article to learn that the decision was made by several magistrates, not a single judge. There's no information available on the m…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 08:16 PM
2

Take a second to consider the context of my reply, chill out, and maybe next time you won't be such a dick because you didn't understand what was being said.
/r/MensRights17/09/17 08:09 PM
3

Corinne Saunders-Silk, the prosecutor of the Cambridge assault false-accusation case, was also the prosecutor in a case involving a taxi driver who was charged with assaulting a woman with his vehicle, solely on her testimony, and that of a single, questionably independent witness. The "victim" openly states I was in charge of 13 other women so was only 5/10 on a scale of being drunk So let's start with that. First of all, are these full grown adults, or children, because I don't understand how …
/r/MensRights17/09/17 07:52 PM
2

serving magistrates for Huntingdon EDIT: Just to further prove my point, I couldn't find anything on the magistrates themselves, like the parent comment. I did find the bench overseeing the magistrates, Penny Kingham. While female, she has a long history of service. I found an article from 2004, where she jailed a couple for 35 days for animal cruelty - no differentiation in the punishment. So while a single example can't provide full context, there is at the very least lack of evidence that she…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:45 PM
2

Your response is perfectly reasonable. I'll refute the first point, but the second I understand and agree to, and had the OP made that point, I wouldn't have bothered commenting, although neither would my parent commenter. Lady feminist judge that must hate men? Fucking hate psychotic bitches. That is what I take issue with. The first statement is just an assumption that stems from anger towards women/feminism, not based in any reality. In fact, he was facing judgement by a group of magistrates,…
/r/MensRights17/09/17 06:07 PM
0

The judges don't really matter. What matters is that generalized anti-misognystic bullshit doesn't have a place here. Half the battle with men's rights is convincing the public that it isn't a bunch of women hating social outcasts like redpill. The fact that you refuted the sentiment is enough. It sucks there's a vocal minority that will take any chance to shit on women they can find, but it's that or go down the road to censorship like twox. Id rather have free thought. We just have to combat s…
/r/MensRights16/09/17 05:30 PM
10

I think it's interesting that women are so acutely and actively engaged with denouncing societal standards for female body image, despite perpetuating that image, both individually (through selective participation - e.g. disavowing size ideals, but wearing makeup daily; and paradoxically, the reassertion of image ideals - e.g. real women have curves) and collectively (by marketing those ideals to their peers). Whatever the standard, they have control. However, when it comes to men, there is an a…
/r/MensRights10/09/17 12:40 PM
8

This article is three years old, and while wrong in its minimization and codification of male circumcision in both western and African cultures, is also a symptom of the fervent and explosive opposition to FGM of the time. Activists sought to bring the practice under the scrutiny of western society, but in attempting to ensure enough power to effect change, they overstated the issue, for the sake of concerted interest. This article is critical of that overwrought viewpoint, and while it doesn't …
/r/MensRights10/09/17 11:34 AM
1

The irony is just too much Advocate for women to be treated like women and you're demonized. I'm a gay guy with a healthy mix of effeminate and masculine innate qualities. I played sports from childhood through high school, I liked math as a student, I was naturally talented at coding; I also played with barbies and did my sisters' hair as a child. I think he made excellent suggestions and would love to work at a company that enacted them. And I'd bet that most of the women who are demonizing hi…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 10:07 PM
1

I at least expected "you really expect me to read all that" but got nothing. Two positive responses from guys she's friends with though.
/r/MensRights01/05/17 12:48 AM
5

Yea I don't doubt it. It was more for me than anything else. Once I started I couldn't stop. But maybe someone will find something useful in it.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 04:05 AM
7

Yea man, I don't really get too caught up in facebook, and most of my friends are pretty intellectual and reasonable people. I've culled the others. I doubt she'll be bothered with reading it, but she's not really a hardcore feminist anyway. More likely she read one of the million clickbait posts she subscribes to and liked it, then thought nothing more on it. I enjoy writing, and I've been more focused lately on cementing my ideologies around the MRM, educating myself so that I can effect chang…
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:20 PM
6

Lol, I know it was far more effort than warranted. Once I started I wanted to finish the thought process. It was just as much for myself as the recipient or bystanding audience. I figure it's something I can reference again in the future, and posting it here may also validate my effort to some extent. Regardless if anyone reads it, it was a good mental exercise for me, and helped expand and clarify my ideology.
/r/MensRights28/04/17 06:01 PM
3

Regarding "bulk," it's as intended, meaning "mass, " although I knew it sounded odd at the time, since it's typically used as "bulk of X." Nevertheless bunkum may be more appropriate. I agree with your statement regarding the definition of feminism. Frankly, it seems that that definition is whatever the feminist you're currently being lectured by says it is. I went with a non-loaded definition because I wanted to negate any arguments of projection bias and it fit the narrative of "feminism think…
/r/MensRights28/04/17 05:57 PM
1

Hi Rootsinsky. I apologize for the length of my post, I'm aware that I lack brevity in my writing, generally, and it's a flaw of mine. I genuinely appreciate you taking the time to read my response and reply. This response will likely be lengthy, as well, so if you could extend that generosity once more, I would be extremely grateful. I didn't mean to be antagonistic in my tone, but it obviously effected animosity, in you, towards me. Maybe it was just the perspective you perceived, as a whole. …
/r/MensRights25/04/17 07:51 PM
1

[continued] This is not justice, no matter his guilt or innocence. Justice is an impossibility here, because they waited until he had lived his life literally once and a half over since their involvement in it. If he was an abuser, they left him free to abuse for 35 years. If he wasn't (the far more likely scenario to any rational person), they have ruined the rest of an old man's life because they're fucked in the head and looking for a target to blame. There is no hard evidence. The victims ac…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 03:15 PM
1

He stressed he was not punishing him for going to trial, or criticising his lawyers, who were acting on Fieldew's own instructions. The judge said Fieldew had shown no remorse or even regret for his crimes at trial. The article implies that the Judge was punishing him for lack of remorse and regret, by making a statement regarding that, after declaring it wasn't punishing him for going to trial. Here's the problem with that. If we assume his position, that he is indeed innocent, he is being sent…
/r/MensRights25/04/17 02:54 PM
4

I really appreciate your thanks, we all do what we can.
/r/MensRights09/04/17 05:54 PM
13

I would disabuse them by pointing out their obvious sexism, by replacing "26 year old woman" with "26 year old man." If a gay 11 year old engaged in sex, "consensually," with a 26 year old man, these people would be quick to call that man a sick and perverted pedophile. Not once have I ever seen anyone condone the gay version of this phenomenon. Indeed, recent events like a police officer having sex with a 17 year old boy - who was on Grindr, actively looking for sex, agreed over text to a sexua…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 01:31 PM
1

See: NY stop and frisk ruling
/r/MensRights08/04/17 11:00 PM
1

Exactly. This is Donald Trump we're talking about.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 07:20 PM
1

https://youtu.be/ac0BxACky5w?t=1m35s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-e3T3VHmEkg https://youtu.be/QihT0fZi1rc?t=1m30s http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/09/trump-supporters-neo-nazis-white-nationalists-kkk-militias-racism-hate https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/08/07/top-nazi-leader-trump-will-be-a-real-opportunity-for-white-nationalists/ http://usuncut.com/news/trump-supporters-neo-nazi-party-dc-just-backfired-beautiful-way/ Not precisely "marching around in the stree…
/r/MensRights02/12/16 07:08 AM
-1

As a gay man, very deep into the homo-elite (heh), this is only the first part of the Agenda. Hold tight to your buttholes, gentlemen.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 10:18 PM
1

I think they'd be more likely to say that patriarchy allowed this girl to avoid punishment. His father denied his child's testimony, arguing that he is sex crazed and enjoyed it. His father's need to assert his son's masculinity and heterosexualality is a result of patriarchal concepts. Furthermore, the judge removed this woman's culpability because women aren't held to the same standards as men regarding sex, that is they don't really want it and can't act as aggressors, another failure of the …
/r/MensRights18/09/16 09:30 AM
2

The idea that her immaturity "lowers the arithmetic gap" is absurd! It absolutely does not! That's not how arithmetic works! Is that what we teach in school now? "Well Johnny has 3 apples and Susie has 5 apples but 2 of her apples are a little on the smaller side and have a bruise. How many more apples does Susie have than Johnny? The answer is ZERO, Johnny and Susie have the exact same number of apples, because 2 of hers don't count." You could say her immaturity lowers the proverbial gap, or t…
/r/MensRights18/09/16 09:13 AM
-1

Milo is a piece of shit and absolutely is a gay uncle Tom. Making fun of basic white girls and poking fun at religious zealots isn't the same as overtly racist depictions made en masse. It's a false equivalency and doesn't justify her treatment. I'm a gay MRA, and I can't see how the racist shitstorm she suffered has anything to do with our movement. It's one thing to analyze the female critic backlash against male reviewers, looking at her movie as a whole. It's another to criticize her as an i…
/r/MensRights22/07/16 07:43 AM
1

Just to clarify, a lot of these cases, this one included, are not simply statutory rape but sexual assault and child abuse. These people are monsters and should be locked up, if not for retribution, which these judges seem appallingly unwilling to apply to women, then for the safety of the public.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 01:57 PM
1

This is so absurd to me. At least they provided you with the tools to fix it. OP to this thread stated they were sent home. And we wonder why boys are falling behind in education...We would rather a boy fail to receive a day's worth of education than suffer his teenage whiskers.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 10:45 PM
4

Was this a public high school? Where? How is this allowed?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 08:47 PM
4

I think they're just using it as a marketing gimmick. They believe more men would be likely to support giving water to women in particular. They're just playing off social norms to sell a product.
/r/MensRights21/03/15 05:03 PM
0

No, it's clear, and promoting it makes a mockery of the community.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 10:21 PM
0

Downvote for obvious troll
/r/MensRights18/02/15 05:41 PM
2

This is so disgusting. I think people forget that the 50s weren't that long ago, or maybe that this sort of thing happened long before. Nope. This is our grandparents generation. The one currently holding office. And it's so evident that discrimination hasn't died, what with stop and frisk policies and drug enforcement laws that are abused to specifically target blacks. America is still filled with bigots and racists, it's just gotten better at hiding it out in the open.
/r/MensRights09/02/15 03:45 AM
2

I feel you on this, but at the same time, there's always two sides to every story. I wonder, is any topic specifically a sore point, or is it basically any time you try to say anything emotional? That's me playing devil's advocate. The rest of me says your girlfriend really just sounds like a bitch and I feel sorry that you feel stuck with her. It's not healthy, you should at least make a point to work it out. I know reddit's fond of the breakup route typically, but I don't know your history tog…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 12:42 AM
0

I understand. I agree that it's not clear gender bias. But don't you think you could make that point more effectively the way you just explained it to me, rather than sardonically?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:42 PM
14

The man plead guilty to false imprisonment. Being that she's his wife living in the same home, how could she not also be found guilty for this? What happened was that they all plead out, and the prosecution was happy to get some jail time to those abusers they felt played the biggest role. 4 months is a pretty light sentence for helping to mentally and physically abuse someone for months, however. I get what you're saying, but no one in that fucked up family should be serving less than 5 years. …
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:24 PM
1

Oh man, "LDS services"; he was adopted out to mormons! First of all, I strongly believe that religious people are the most entitled type: the more devout, the more entitled. Because they can attribute everything to God. I only bring up this atheist slant because I know these people are never going to give up this child. Beyond that, the poor child! The guy seems really young, but he seems like he really wants to be a father, and I think that that's all you really need to ultimately be successful…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 12:15 PM
4

Hey, I'm sorry you were attacked for saying you did not feel like the MRM was something that affects you. You said particularly that you feel that it is 'quite toxic on issues you care about.' May I ask you to explain that a bit more in depth? I think it's always important to be aware of your criticisms and try to appease them when legitimate, so I would be grateful. I consider myself a part of the community, but I always hold my own opinions before anything else, so I would consider it a person…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:48 AM
2

Hey, I'm gay, and have been part of the MRM for a while. Originally, I was skeptical because it has such a poor reputation within the reddit community, which I can only assume is due to the apathetic, those who specifically attempt to smear the movement (ie. SRS), and the general white knightery that exists in unreal proportions, likely due to the typical socially inept reddit user overcompensating for what he lacks in his personal life. I've sinced learned that the community is very warm, invit…
/r/MensRights04/01/14 11:36 AM
7

As a gay guy I've always found it a bit unfair that women got to sort of "cheat" the attraction game. Because I have no fear of feeling emasculated, I took to wearing cover up on occasion. It's very liberating to not have to worry about whether a small blemish here or there is detracting from what you're saying or how you generally look. Sometimes I've lightly lined my upper eye lid; I have light blue eyes and it brings them out. I've only ever once been question if I was wearing any, by my best…
/r/MensRights03/01/14 05:55 PM
12

Well, I'm pretty sure that's a living woman. Can't get much more realistic than that. I suppose she's supposed to gain weight and stop wearing makeup for the benefit of womankind?
/r/MensRights30/12/13 05:06 PM
6

It always irks me to see 'gay' as a synonym for stupid or bad. Not in a "this person hates gay people" way, but more of a "are we really still saying this" kind of way. Cognitive linguistics would have us believe that associating words with connotations outside of their definitions still causes a subconscious link to those same connotations even when using the words according to their definitive meanings. So while I think most people would see your comment as 'no harm intended', it still feels l…
/r/MensRights05/10/13 12:25 PM
5

Your response has merit except for the last paragraph. The study shows the same aversion to bisexual men and women and women by heterosexual women, meaning the results are gender neutral. This is no more evidence for men being afraid of being physically threatened or otherwise mistreated by other men due to sexual attraction than for women.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 10:56 AM
3

“(UW Police) are saying they cracked a case in two days that only the FBI could,” Kandt clucked. The citation against Lanker-Simons is a “classic case of blaming the victim,” Kandt proclaimed. UW Police “have bullied her and they have pulled a bluff.” She said: “This is the worst episode of ‘Law & Order’ you can imagine." Holy fuck.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 07:37 PM
5

What people are saying is that this man didn't get the resources he required to do good in the world because his good was directed towards men. What is wrong with you? Seriously, how can you read a sad story, any sad story, and diminish and ridicule the empathy of those who recognize it for what it is? EDIT: You should realize that feminists get so much ridicule because of reactions like this. How can you attack someone for supporting a person wholly trying to do good in the world and expect emp…
/r/MensRights29/04/13 07:09 PM
2

I downvoted you for two reasons. One, insults are used for a variety of purposes; it's incredibly conceited of you to make this summation as though insults have never been, nor ever are, used outside of an argumentative context, or within an argumentative context solely as a result of 'losing.' Two, you managed to out-arrogance yourself with your edited statement speaking of your astonishment that somehow people could disagree with you.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:14 PM
15

Downvoted for being simply incorrect. This is a sad case, but there is no indication that it's being handled improperly. While the bail is relatively low, IMO, if "Faas makes bail she [must] be monitored by GPS and have no contact with the child or the child’s father" (Source). Furthermore Faas pleaded not guilty to false imprisonment and tampering with witnesses and informants and is scheduled to be tried for the two misdemeanor charges in October. As the other charges are felonies, Cappiello e…
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:36 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter