| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Judge orders divorced man to take down a blog he doesn't own/control or go to jail & lose custodyYour point? I'm guessing you know the "Psycho Ex Wife" so why don't you just contact her yourself instead of waiting for her? FYI, he is within his rights to actually post her name as well, hell he can even write a tell all book and make money from it, fact is he is telling the truth so there is nothing the ex can do about it. He wanted to protect his children and his ex, and if you think you are doing a favor by putting their names out there, you aren't very smart, you are hurting the person yo… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/11 04:44 PM |
| 2 | Judge orders divorced man to take down a blog he doesn't own/control or go to jail & lose custodyYour point? I'm guessing you know the "Psycho Ex Wife" so why don't you just contact her yourself instead of waiting for her? FYI, he is within his rights to actually post her name as well, hell he can even write a tell all book and make money from it, fact is he is telling the truth so there is nothing the ex can do about it. He wanted to protect his children and his ex, and if you think you are doing a favor by putting their names out there, you aren't very smart, you are hurting the person yo… | /r/MensRights | 18/07/11 04:43 PM |
| 1 | Judge orders divorced man to take down a blog he doesn't own/control or go to jail & lose custodyThat reply wasn't to you, lol, I think you understand perfectly. | /r/MensRights | 24/06/11 01:21 AM |
| 8 | Judge orders divorced man to take down a blog he doesn't own/control or go to jail & lose custodyIt's only contempt of court if it's a lawful order. It's not, so he's not in contempt. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/11 11:26 PM |
| 8 | Judge orders divorced man to take down a blog he doesn't own/control or go to jail & lose custodyHe was mistaken. But actually that is EXACTLY what the first amendment means, the speech is "protected" from action from the government unless it's slander or libel. If it is slander or libel, it's not up to a family court judge to make the ruling, especially on no evidence, which if you read the transcript you would see there was none presented that would determine it was either libel or slander. Further there is plenty of case law that supports that an entity cannot use content that falls unde… | /r/MensRights | 23/06/11 11:24 PM |
| 20 | Judge orders divorced man to take down a blog he doesn't own/control or go to jail & lose custodyIt's abuse to write about your ex blacking our drunk in front of your 8 year old, but it's not abuse for your ex to get black out drunk in front of your 8 year old? Family Courts: Lacking Common Sense Since 2011, or forever, whichever came first. | /r/MensRights | 23/06/11 05:42 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter