TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

idlepetri Archive

View 0 posts and 193 comments by idlepetri on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

It took me a while to figure out you were referencing my flair
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 07:08 PM
1

And why would that be evidence of your claim?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:42 PM
3

Cool
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:31 PM
5

How is this remotely relevant to my question? Can you answer my question?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:27 PM
8

then you are simply straw manning they are open about sleeping with women based on one set of standards and committing to women based on another set of standards.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:25 PM
1

lady, take a deep breath The person you’re replying to was responding to this: Do you really think attractive women who are generally attractive because they have access to education So it was specifically about education as a factor for attraction. Then you went on some unrelated tirade.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:21 PM
2

But why do you think women are more afraid of men than men are afraid of men, given violent crime rates are higher against men?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:18 PM
1

I’m not disputing that women won’t date men who have been with men. Your explanation of the reason for this is circular and based on your biases.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 06:11 PM
1

I’m not making any claim and therefore can’t answer your question. You did indeed answer my question, which confirmed my suspicion that your conclusion is purely your bias and you have no other reason to make your conclusion.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:54 PM
1

Your argument is entirely circular and you’re assuming the thing you’re trying to prove.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:33 PM
1

Yes. You’re dodging any justification of your answer, because that’s the hard part
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:24 PM
1

Why is it homophobia?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:05 PM
2

No, you dodged and are dodging again. Looking at your post history, I get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 04:43 PM
1

I don’t see what difference this makes but I’ll happily reword to avoid you dodging the question If the man has to pay FOR BOTH OF THEM on a date, is it the result of the woman being low quality?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 03:09 PM
26

She ends up having to pay FOR THE BOTH OF THEM just so she could get out of the situation. Is a woman low quality if the man has to pay FOR BOTH OF THEM on a date?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 05:37 AM
0

Yes you have repeatedly “answered” my question by flipping the question back to me, and I ignore it because it’s not a good faith response and the burden is on you since you’re making the claim of what explains the behavior
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 01:10 AM
1

Convenient
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 01:08 AM
1

Cool. So if you truly believe it’s impossible for government to ever initiate a draft, what’s your problem with requiring women to register for it? Women get to live in a fantasy land when it comes to this stuff. Privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:50 AM
1

Even if I grant you that there is some distinction between preference and dealbreaker, you still have not made any explanation for why that means it is homophobia. Your argument appears to be entirely circular.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:47 AM
0

Ok so what are we debating? I don’t understand what you think you’re disagreeing with me on
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:38 PM
1

It doesn’t matter if I want it. Governments will always reserve the right to conscript its citizens in existential war. So there are only two choices: men or men+women. Women don’t want that kind of equality so they play pretend like you’re playing.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:37 PM
1

The government is a party to a marriage. They are not a party to my legal documents that give rights to my long term partner. If you’re confused by this simple statement, that’s fine. In my view there is no reason to bring the government to to my long term relationship and I won’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:13 PM
1

I want to be able to fly, too. What’s the point of this conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:11 PM
-1

This is fantasy land, man. Women select for a ton of immutable traits. I agree that n count is worse in some cosmic sense because it’s a choice. But people are not logically tuning their attractiveness meter to traits that are under the other person’s control. In a strictly evo psych sense, it’s much the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 11:11 PM
1

You said give you examples of how the rules changed after one has married and without their consent. I did.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:49 PM
1

Are you mixing up debates? I don’t care if you exclude men with high n. But there are numerous examples of men and women having opposite preferences and that is A-OK.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:48 PM
1

This is what women say to avoid arguing for equality
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:25 PM
2

Why is it not a preference if it’s a dealbreaker? How is this not homophobia? I asked you to justify why you can assume homophobia is the reason and all you did was turn the question around
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:24 PM
1

Who cares why they changed
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:22 PM
1

Would be a great own if I said a different argument like women only select for height or women select the tallest man they can
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:21 PM
2

Why is that preference prima facia evidence of homophobia?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:46 PM
1

It’s not transphobia. Whether women are conscious of it or not, the idea of their boyfriend having performed oral sex on a penis is going to destroy a lot of views she wants to have of her man
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:45 PM
2

Do you prefer a man who is taller than you? Is that hypocritical? Do you prefer a man who is less emotional and more stoic than you? Is that hypocritical? Do you prefer a man who is stronger than you? More funny than you? Has more penises and fewer vaginas than you? I have no idea if I’m right, but my assumption is that women do the “I know you are but what am I” schtick because it reduces their accountability for a trait they had full control over and some/many men find unattractive, and perhap…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:41 PM
1

What exactly is the scenario you are presenting? An person with XX chromosomes who has a vagina or a person with XY chromosomes who has undergone a surgery to create something looking like a vagina?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:31 PM
-4

Well you can certainly keep saying that
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:19 PM
1

It’s literally not a straw man argument. It isn’t even an argument. I didn’t refute anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 09:19 PM
-10

No, it wasn’t. It was a sarcastic comment that highlighted something about the parent comment. Any other questions?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:57 PM
-11

Straw man argument
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:12 PM
0

Do you have any evidence of those changes? Sure. No fault divorce. Trump tax cuts. Many more. Any other questions or is my point clear?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 08:12 PM
1

Well one reason is that the rules can change at any time without your consent. There is no logical reason to get married anymore and lots of reasons not to. It’s just cultural inertia at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:39 PM
3

Marriage is fundamentally a tax and shared asset status, along with some other bits like power of attorney / visitation status. The only thing left is tax status. Everything else can and is done with trivial documents.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:23 PM
2

There is no longer any semantic difference between a long term relationship and marriage: * say that you commit for life * can change your mind at any time for any reason or no reason * can include partner in estate planning and medical decisions * can have and raise children or not * can share finances or not share finances
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:13 PM
-6

And only the self matters
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:00 PM
–

Science is wrong because feelings Good job not reinforcing stereotypes
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 06:11 PM
2

That’s literally not how attraction works. There is an entire field of study in psychology that shows you have no idea what you’re talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 06:04 PM
1

Both sexes deal with this because people are really bad at knowing what they want and are attracted to
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 04:55 PM
4

Yes, random chance sounds like a much more plausible explanation, because that’s how the human brain works everywhere else in life.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 03:31 PM
6

Women will claim that they grow in attraction to men over time, but this is either (a) conflating a reduction of fear with growing attraction, or (b) ignoring that the man bettered himself over that time
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:46 PM
1

A man who doesn’t register for the draft commits a felony
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:21 PM
1

Your example demonstrates nothing counter to my claim. Logic is hard for you
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 02:19 PM
7

Fair but the study is of people who believed they had their drink spiked
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 01:53 AM
3

I agree with you. My word choice was poor. I did not mean to imply the women were seeking a relationship, only that it’s mathematically not possible for them all to get one.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:45 AM
0

You seem to have read a theory I didn’t state. Typical on Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:43 AM
31

Not getting to know women from my experience. If you can get women comfortable with you, you’ll have an easier in dating generally. Friend zone
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 11:39 PM
5

Those that want a partner are required to put out while being judged for doing exactly that By the math of it, almost everyone who is sleeping with the top lion is not going to get him as a partner. Women who are giving sex to the top % of men in pursuit of a relationship are embarrassing themselves, but they rarely recognize it and learn. It’s got to be hard to recognize it and learn when from the moment you came on the dating scene, men were lining up to give you attention. I don’t know how on…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 11:36 PM
1

i have no idea what the fuck kind of parent joe from the bar is gonna be i can't fuck people from the bar because he might choose to abandon is kids? Priceless reply
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 08:52 PM
2

I see what you did there (But also I don’t have a problem with hypergamy and think it’s rational behavior. The denial is annoying though.)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 08:45 PM
6

This might be the first time I’ve seen the OP be the troll
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 04:17 PM
2

nice try
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 04:13 PM
1

Expecting someone to have intelligently formed opinions on issues is not a high standard. Hard disagree. Almost everyone has plenty of really dumb opinions based on feelings, media misinformation, and illogical thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 04:03 PM
3

You misread her comment
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 03:26 PM
2

Fair would be men and women both signing up for the draft and fully eligible for meat shield combat roles, and if you wanted to filter combat vs support roles based on tested physical capability, you’d apply the test to men and women
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:50 PM
3

Not going to waste a ton of time with you, but just to be clear I am specifically saying women do NOT have a numerical height preference and can’t tell the difference between 6’ vs 5’10 but they absolutely do have a preference for tall men that they judge based on visual inspection, which is approximate Hope this helps you since you have poor reading comprehension
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:18 PM
0

no accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:13 PM
2

That is my rebuttal. You have a preferred outcome that benefits women, and as is often the case you will shroud that pursuit
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:01 PM
6

Yes I am very surprised you came up with additional reasons why we should not have women included in the draft.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:53 PM
6

Why would you have unprotected sex with someone that is terrible?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:43 PM
2

The actual autistic argument is coming from youwhere you think women are all pulling out tape measures to check if their husband is a few cm "too short" from their "acceptable height" I’m literally saying the opposite of this. Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:41 PM
3

Generally the argument is that women specifically won't date under 6ft. No it isn’t. If you ask women to give a height preference, either verbally or on a dating app search screen, they may respond with 6ft. As I’ve explained to you twice now, this is different than the actual height attraction factor, which is visual Only 15% of men are over 6ft, so no the claim is not that women refuse to date 85% of men on height alone
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:40 PM
1

Will you marry me
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:35 PM
1

Ok, women register for the draft at 18 or else are thrown in jail, but we limit the roles they would perform to support roles that don’t require male physical advantages. Deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:33 PM
4

Lady, what on earth are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:31 PM
9

This chick’s job is just to take every anti-male position possible, no matter how absurd it is. Don’t feed the trolls.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:21 PM
-4

As for the father stuff, that's such a difficult thing, how do you get men not interested in being good father's to interact with their children in a way that's positive for the children. Don’t sleep with terrible men
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:20 PM
1

Is everyone in this site autistic? I used a high number to make a point. If you want a woman intelligent enough to have an IQ of 120, then you’re excluding 90% of the dating pool on that one trait alone. That’s the point. If it’s that important to you, then rock on. I don’t get it, but I don’t have to.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:10 PM
4

This is such an autistic argument. Do you have eyes? Then you know how tall he is. When one says women are attracted to money and height, the person is not talking about some weird attraction to the numbers themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:06 PM
0

As has always been the case when you reply to me, I have no idea what your point is
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:04 PM
-1

Ah so he was your dream guy except didn’t floss? We believe you
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:02 PM
0

Be a good man and don’t ever call a woman on her bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:59 AM
5

“There is this guy I’m no longer interested in that has qualities the red pill guys say I wouldn’t like. And this proves the red pill guys wrong.”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:54 AM
-3

A gold digger isn’t someone who is excited by the number on a guy’s W-2. A gold digger is seeking a lifestyle, and you’re surely aware of the lifestyle your husband can provide. That said, men complaining about gold diggers are mostly idiots. Providing for one’s family is one of a man’s primary contributions to a relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 02:52 AM
1

Why wouldn’t a woman want a man who makes 500k/year?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 09:07 PM
1

Word salad that basically agrees with me that it’s not the urban location that is driving the difference
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 08:19 PM
-1

I’m responsible for my viewpoints, not some random group you think I’m associated with.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 08:00 PM
1

Why be empathetic if the world revolves around you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 07:39 PM
0

I don’t understand why you’re having trouble with basic logic. I will try once more and then assume you’re trolling. If Group 1 has outcome A while Group 2 has outcome B, outcome A cannot be explained by a treatment condition that is given to both Group 1 and Group 2. So let’s say everyone has the flu. Group 1 you give orange juice and make them do 100 jumping jacks. Group 2 you give a ham sandwich and make them do 100 jumping jacks. Group 1 recovers and Group 2 remains ill. It’s illogical to co…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 07:07 PM
1

People get one shot at life, and it makes me sad to watch people obsess over things that don’t matter, and even if they did matter they have no ability to control. People who over-consume political news like you get more ill as we approach the election each cycle. Admittedly, 20 years or so ago I was pretty sucked in. In my defense, both political parties spend billions convincing us of existential threats that, surprisingly, can only be avoided if we do exactly what they want us to do (donate m…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 07:03 PM
1

No, I’m sorry but you’re messing up the logic. The post is saying that intelligent people are comparatively more able to have sex and then this claim is it’s because they’re in cities. But cities are mostly non-intelligent people. So being in a city can’t possibly explain the increased sexual activity when slicing by intelligence.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:42 PM
0

Yes I cannot argue the merits of your delusional conspiracy theory that you’re obsessed with but doesn’t matter. Hope you get the help you need
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:39 PM
1

Alrighty. Still don’t get it, but okay. Been in a LTR for almost 2 decades now. If I had limited the dating pool to women of similar or greater intelligence, I’m pretty sure I’d be single. But if it works for you, great.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:13 PM
0

Dumb people have opinions. So I still don’t get it. I need my partner to be smart enough to understand things I say, or else disagreements would be frustrating, but I certainly don’t need her to be as smart as me or smarter than me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:52 PM
0

Do you really not see these replies as clear evidence of mental illness?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:49 PM
1

That’s pretty brutal. You’re a little strange but I would not call you a void.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:33 PM
-1

I don’t read documents that don’t matter
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:32 PM
1

I’m not trying to convince you of anything
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:29 PM
1

So you’re looking to learn things you don’t already know from your female partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:13 PM
1

Are you autistic? Honest question
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:12 PM
-1

Do you think this reply makes you look less insane?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:11 PM
1

One could prove it through observation, self-report surveys, and probably any number of other study designs. Certainly not by looking at neurotransmitters. That was embarrassing to say. Do you want to ask the same question any more times or are we done?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:33 PM
2

No it isn’t. Most people that live in cities are not college educated or smart. The answer is that intelligence is correlated with money and money increases your access to sex for practical reasons (cost of dates) and attraction reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:30 PM
1

I don’t care about you or your life and my comment was about women. The word “women” is a plural so clearly not just about you. But you seem well adjusted.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:24 PM
–

I give up. Enjoy whatever planet you live on
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:24 PM
–

Another woman believes a general observation is all about her
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:23 PM
-2

This is the wingnuttery you get when you don’t actually know any conservatives and have developed a caricature based on extensive research you did watching msnbc
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:21 PM
1

What does a woman’s intelligence get you in a relationship that justifies you making it a top priority?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:18 PM
4

She means money
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:17 PM
1

No. It’s money.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:17 PM
0

If you don’t like drinking urine, don’t piss in the well!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:10 PM
1

Do you think cheating on your spouse is immoral? If so, are you limited to just not cheating yourself or is it perhaps okay to discuss the issue online?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:08 PM
-1

Women overuse the term “abuse” to avoid accountability
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:06 PM
6

“ The truth about women is you can do anything to them except bore them.”
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:59 PM
–

Absolutely incredible. You credit women with “approaching” when they already have a “flirtatious relationship” with the man. Wonder how the “flirtatious relationship” started! Women live life on easy mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:52 PM
–

It’s amazing how clueless women are to how dating works given they’re one half of the equation Total lack of ability to observe the world from any perspective than their own
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:47 PM
–

Which oxygen are you willing to breathe? The oxygen over here or over there? Oh, you’re indiscriminately breathing? Perhaps that’s because what you benefit from oxygen is available from all oxygen.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:45 PM
–

In your view, what exactly are the dimensions that a man would differentiate their attraction to females on? Because another way to say what you’re saying is that women aren’t very unique and what they offer men in a relationship is generally available from other women.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:42 PM
–

Both things can be true when 10% of men are the ones running through 50% of women
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:36 PM
1

you’ll get through this
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:33 PM
1

You know what schrodinger's cat is? That’s so cool! I am very impressed. This was a great save after you spent 20 replies asking me about arguments I didn’t make due to your own trauma and biases. Very positive view of you now as a person.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:18 PM
–

Sex is not that hard, bro. I agree women don’t have to do anything skillful for sex to be good for a man, and that the reverse isn’t true. But it’s just not that hard. Even dumb people can do it. And just don’t waste your time on the small percentage of women who are focused on your bullet points
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:14 PM
2

Well you certainly wouldn’t prove it by mapping the entire electrochemical function of every neuron in the brain! What a clown
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:04 PM
1

So you need a parenthetical to assume I was speaking only about women? Ok, then you simply made a silly error. I was speaking about my personal experience (as a man) and the experiences of my male and female friends. Are we done?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:03 PM
2

If a woman thinks her value is saving a 15 minute order on Amazon once per month, that’s pretty sad. All of these things are minor contributions that take little effort or can be easily and cheaply outsourced. The real problem here is that most women can’t articulate what they actually do bring to a relationship that a man wants.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:01 PM
0

I didn’t say value. I asked what are the top 3 things that a woman brings to her relationship If you can’t answer, that’s cool and is what I expected. I can’t answer either.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:59 PM
0

You’re dodging. What are the top 3 for women?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:31 PM
1

how girls lose their virginity. Where did I talk about this? You’re continuing to demonstrate that you’re filling in bits of arguments you’ve heard from other people into what I said. I’m sorry you’re triggered by those arguments but I’m not responsible for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:27 PM
1

Those are the things I actually said! Good work. You disagree. Got it. Anything else?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:21 PM
1

You are projecting onto me arguments I never made. I can tell because you and others keep saying “pair bonding”
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:10 PM
2

Your entire post is criticizing how men view women as commodities and that they must view them as equals. Perhaps if you struggle to answer my question, I will be able to change your view
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 01:09 PM
2

She doesn't cook for her husband - only for her kids Who cares. Easily outsourced. Does not help with any bills - his job is to provide for the family Not a problem She does not do his laundry - he's responsible Who cares. Easily outsourced. He is responsible for buying his own essentials as well Who cares
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:45 PM
5

Real question: what are the top 3 contributions a woman makes to a long term relationship?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:25 PM
17

This feels like a strawman argument, because I’ve never seen this discussion in the way you’re saying I have seen the discussion of women being the gatekeepers of sex (men aren’t entitled to sex) and men being the gatekeepers of relationships (women aren’t entitled to relationships)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:16 PM
1

so you're … calling neurotransmitters rubbish Neurotransmitters are very real. They don’t work at all like the lady implied.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:14 PM
-1

I usually see people claim that pair bonding gets hardened due to changes related neurotransmitters This is what people say when their understanding of the brain comes from reading a USA Today article. It’s about a million times more complicated than this > How do you think the mechanism works? I don’t care about the biological substrates of the mechanism. It’s irrelevant to whether or not the behavior occurs. That’s not what I see around me. Ah, excellent, so you do understand the concept of ob…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:08 PM
-4

Neurotransmitters are pseudoscience? What you said about neurotransmitters is pseudoscientific nonsense. How would you prove your claim I shared with you my observation of the world around me. If you can relate, then the observation is likely to resonate and you’ll find it insightful. If you can’t relate, then sharing my observation won’t be effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:10 AM
-10

difference in producing neurotransmitters This is pseudoscience gibberish Most people who lost their virginity to someone they had been dating for a meaningful amount of time (ie, you didn’t just get railed in the back of a car after 10 tequilas) can recall being irrationally bonded to the person to the point of acting insane for some period of time after a breakup. And then the next sexual partner, still some strong bonding and some minor insanity. And then the next sexual partner, less…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 05:05 AM
0

bonding
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 04:40 AM
11

OP, this is a bad look.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 03:30 AM
4

If the day you join the dating marketplace you have hundreds of men lining up to give you attention, shower you with gifts, etc after you’ve done literally nothing, it’s natural to develop exactly this perception. And it would be weird, in this context, to spend time thinking about what you can bring to a relationship to attract a man. It takes many women a long time to realize that male sexual attention and male relationship interest are two separate things.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:57 AM
-1

Would be an interesting dating strategy to communicate that you won’t go down on your female partner just to filter out people for whom it would be a dealbreaker. Then maybe once you have a keeper, have at it.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:49 AM
0

No, you didn’t understand my reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:36 AM
4

You forgot the paternity uncertainty theory I have no idea why I am unwilling to sleep with a woman with a high n. I don’t really care what the reason is anymore than I care to understand why I prefer brunettes over blondes. This is such a discussed topic because women don’t like that some men have this sexual preference. But too bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:33 AM
1

The reason the response is a bit incoherent is that what OP is stumbling on is the fact that most things that men looked for in women are now largely automated and/or can be outsourced. You can also see this if you ask a woman what she brings to the table in her relationship. She’ll either list a bunch of things that men generally don’t care about or just say “me”.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:16 AM
2

The more my income and wealth increased, the less I want my partner to spend any time making money
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:10 AM
1

Men chatting with AI isn’t as weird as men chatting with men in the Philippines posing as an OnlyFans chick
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:04 AM
3

If her standard of living drops significantly then she’s not perfectly fine Sounds like you’re admitting to what I’m saying: women in these situations choose to be so and the use of “dependent” is improperly used to arouse sympathy
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:26 PM
4

What does “dependent on their husband” mean in your sentence? In my experience, it means the woman would be perfectly fine but her standard of living would drop significantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:10 PM
6

What planet are you sending this from?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:08 PM
13

I have plenty of female friends in their mid 30s who are involuntarily single and depressed about it I don’t even understand what you’re saying doesn’t exist
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:06 PM
3

you’re doing a great job reinforcing stereotypes around women being completely oblivious to how women collectively behave in the dating marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 07:29 PM
17

Its cope from 35 year old childless women who rode the cock carousel in their 20s and are now ready to “settle” for the boring men they friend-zoned, only to find those men to be less interested in them both absolutely (older now, more baggage now, higher n now) and relatively (he can pull younger women now).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 07:22 PM
13

You’ll get through this
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 02:10 AM
0

Rich. They mean rich.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 10:29 PM
10

Who says women don’t have a sense of humor? You must be a blast at cocktail parties. It’s a quote from a movie. There is truth in every joke. Taking it literally is obviously stupid. (Or perhaps not obvious to everyone.)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 10:16 PM
13

With a divorce rate over 40%, we need to define “life partner”. First marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 08:16 PM
38

“ The truth about women is you can do anything to them except bore them.”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 07:59 PM
15

Just don’t spend your resources on women who aren’t like this. Men who are struggling drop their standards because they’re desperate to get laid. “Doc, it hurts when I do this” “Then don’t do that”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 07:58 PM
1

Feminist says “I am fighting for X” I say, “You aren’t fighting for X, because if you were, you’d be advocating for Y which is an example of X.” Let me know if you need me to draw it in a picture with crayon or something
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 07:07 PM
1

But it is Nope “ Feminism is a range of socio-political movementsand ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes.”
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 07:01 PM
1

If feminists’ stated goal was simply to do anything that resulted in a better outcome for the world, perhaps your reply would be remotely relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:44 PM
1

I’m not interested in continuing to try to make you understand a simple point, which is these women are not fighting for gender equality as they claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:30 PM
1

If the woman was fighting for gender equality, it would be critically important to overcome this inequity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 06:26 PM
1

Feel free to scroll up in the conversation if you’ve forgotten my point
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 04:39 PM
1

no
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 04:04 PM
1

Yes, because women and men aren’t equal in the ways that matter for military success
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 03:50 PM
1

Why would they not want a military that consists equally of women and men?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:58 PM
1

They won’t “allow” it because they need votes. Men and same women would oppose it because they know women are not equal to men in ways that matter for the military, and feminists would oppose it because they don’t actually believe in gender quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:50 PM
1

I already addressed this in my original comment. That’s not equality. They would be in equally dangerous roles and not over-represented in support functions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:48 PM
2

I don’t have any need to give you any examples, nuances, or specifics I’ve politely tried a couple times now to say I don’t care to convince you of anything and I don’t care to figure out why your experience is such an outlier (I’ll add “in my opinion” so you don’t get triggered and reply again)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 04:38 AM
3

Whether or not we have a draft is not a feminist question. You can imagine whatever fantasy land you want where there is no forced military conscription. Here in the real world, let’s assume forced military conscription will always be a right a government maintains. The feminist-relevant question is whether only men who’d like to vote must register or both genders that would like to vote must register.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 04:35 AM
1

average looking men are dating and marrying well out of their leagues I’m not interested in playing this game where we constantly change the claim we are discussing. The claim is very simple: women want men with money, and therefore a man with money has better dating prospects than the same man without money. You say this isn’t what you and all of your friends experience. Sorry to hear that. It does match mine and I can’t fathom why you see the opposite. But congrats on the financial success.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 04:30 AM
1

I guess the end point is, are you claiming money somehow creates physical attraction? Modifying “attraction” by saying “physical attraction” is strange in this context, but yes money is a primary factor in attraction for women. If your experience is different, I can’t diagnose that at all, which is why it seemed that we live in entirely different planets. Ambition, older age, confidence, leadership, not living with parents, etc etc etc are all proxies for resources. And evolutionary psych has th…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 03:59 AM
1

Just so I understand. You managed to become a high earner and still be unable to get the women you want, and you’re using that personal failure to generalize across all women? I’m not going to compare dick sizes here but I likely out-earn you and I beg to differ with your ridiculous conclusion. You’d also have to explain all the examples I gave of women explicitly using euphemisms for high income in describing their dating preferences and expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:58 AM
1

What planet are you posting this stuff from? Incredible.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 02:25 AM
7

Flan is fine but prefer crème brûlée
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 01:01 AM
3

No, go ahead and repeat your point again like it’s adding something new to the conversation
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 12:03 AM
2

Cool. So women should register for the draft, yes?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:55 PM
1

Yes I was already fully aware of your fantasy land worldview from your earlier reply. Should we just repeat our replies to each other in perpetuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:53 PM
23

I think you’re admitting feminism is a women’s advocacy effort and has nothing to do with gender equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:15 PM
6

There is no such thing as eliminating the draft. Every country will force its populace to fight for it if existentially threatened. Feminists saying “oh yeah men shouldn’t be drafted” are copping out. Equality here would be making both men and women register for the draft and for equally dangerous roles (not just support BS). To be clear, I don’t support this, but I also am not a feminist pretending to be fighting for gender equality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:14 PM
1

Men not being swiped on in OLD apps: Men without friends in their profile photo Men with friends in their profile photo
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:15 PM
37

Every feminist becomes a tradcon as soon as you talk about the draft or who gets in the lifeboats
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 10:12 PM
2

Marriage is downstream of the carrot. The carrot is resources.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:22 PM
3

If you think all of capitalism is immoral, then start a commune and find a wife who wants to live in a shack with a dirt floor. You guys can share values all the way through life. Whats the problem? Or like blebbyroo said, start your own business and run it according to whatever morality you have personally. If you are offering something of value, you’ll be quite comfortable. If you’re entirely divorced from reality, then you’ll fail. You have full freedom. Nobody is oppressing you. Do your thin…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:19 PM
1

Most people have no idea what makes them happy. They instead chase short term euphoria, because that can actually be measured (ie do I feel happy right now?). For example, I could spend $10k on a vacation for two weeks and during those two weeks I will feel amazing. Did the vacation bring me happiness? Thats a harder question that involves complex consequences of spending the $10k. And this is a simplified example; much harder to dig into partner attraction, career direction, etc. Pretty much ev…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:07 PM
1

No I didn’t
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 05:08 PM
1

The way you’re responding is starting to sound childish. All you’re doing is defining “adult” to be masculine and starting to be condescending about me not wanting a boss bitch. If you want a career-driven masculine woman, that’s fine. I don’t care what you do or don’t want, but I can’t relate and it doesn’t make any sense to me. The more successful I have gotten, the less it mattered what if any income she can generate and the more I wanted her to not be tied down with limited vacation or whate…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 12:59 PM
1

I can’t relate. She should be feminine, not masculine. I don’t need a partner who knows how to budget. I know how to budget. I don’t need a partner who knows how to make money. I know how to make money. I don’t need another guy in the relationship. I’m the guy. provides nothing in return except for a handful of household chores I can do myself You need a better woman
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:19 AM
1

I don’t think you understood my reply
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 07:14 AM
1

Amen! They just want an “ambitious” man who is “well groomed”, doesn’t live with his mom, has a car, has “good work ethic”, is a leader, doesn’t lay around playing games and watching tv, doesn’t have debt, doesn’t gamble, and generally “has his shit together”. Nothing at all to do with finances.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:22 AM
1

If you are worried about getting injured, buy disability insurance. If you’re worried about being laid off, have savings. There is no reason why a man can’t have this stuff covered. Using your woman as an insurance policy is gross.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:19 AM
1

This is euphemistic because on its face it would apply regardless of gender, yet men don’t have this standard for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:14 AM
6

lame ass losers Quiet part out loud
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:10 AM
3

It doesn’t occur to most woman to ask themselves what men want in a partner because men trip over themselves to get their attention for the first half of their dating life. It’s not that women don’t have other things to offer; it’s just that they have no idea which of those things are interesting to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 03:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter