~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | “All female athletes deserve equitable pay”It's made more complicated than you are presenting. the US womens teams had some 22% higher viewership in football to the mens in world cup terms. Shit, the mens team didnt even make it to the world cup finals. the women won it. So overall quality may be worse as is well understood but viewers bring ad revenue, namely some 22% higher ad revenue, so you tell me, where should that extra money be paid to exactly. | /r/PussyPassDenied | 22/08/19 03:28 AM |
| 1 | 10 Years, 2 trials, acquitted across the board- I’m out of energysweet fucks. What an ordeal. All the best to you and your kid. | /r/MensRights | 24/04/19 12:06 AM |
| 5 | Fat guys vs. Fat girlsyou realize this is a function of societal expectation right. women have always been ONLY valued for looks and sex. Men for brains and braun (looks being largely irrelevant), so what do you expect the agenda to look like. stop objectifying women so much for looks and fat chicks might not feel so much need to carve out space for their beauty too. similarly fat men have never had a problem getting women, so long as they are rich and society deems that valuable. | /r/MensRights | 26/03/19 02:30 AM |
| 1 | CuntspreadingYou probably know more about this than I do, so if so, excuse my ignorance. I find this argument reductive. Sure, the word stool is no better a description than "hunk of floating atoms". like, yup, language does not have any objective meaning. But fixating on this seems to usurp meaning with some kind of "truth". The subjectivity of an idea, no matter how unfounded in any reality beyond the subject, does not in any way reduce its ability to be shared by any number of other people. As in, the f… | /r/MensRights | 07/01/19 03:22 PM |
| 1 | Cuntspreadingyou are in the humanities and are saying words are words? | /r/MensRights | 07/01/19 02:51 AM |
| 1 | This seems like it belongs here and not in r/funnyI mean do we know everything going on here. It is possible that the models have a clause against being touched in their contracts. Which I wouldn't be surprised if his grab violated. Granted in no way should he be chased around the ring to take this stupid picture. | /r/MensRights | 24/11/18 04:03 PM |
| 1 | Master-post for combating feminist propagandaThese are almost all opinion pieces, Carrie L. Lukas (born 1973)[1] is president of the conservative leaning non-profit Independent Women's Forum (IWF) Ramesh Ponnuru (/rəˈmɛʃ pəˈnʊəruː/; born August 16, 1974) is an American conservative political pundit and journalist the more moderates like CHRISTINA HOFF SOMMERS have more level views. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/18 07:01 PM |
| 0 | Master-post for combating feminist propagandaIf you are UK or USA based I would suggest you scroll down to the appropriate section after reading the study http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GGGR_2017.pdf https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/equal_pay_issue_brief_final.pdf http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/goldin/files/the_quiet_revolution_that_transformed_womens_employment_education_and_family.pdf https://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/media/_media/pdf/key_issues/gender_research.pdf http://www.unwomen.org… | /r/MensRights | 21/11/18 02:13 PM |
| -38 | Master-post for combating feminist propagandaI did, and these facts are all from right wing sources. Hardly fair and balanced reporting. But I mean if you think the right has a monopoly on facts, then you are straying into what one person below says,but but feelz > facts. | /r/MensRights | 21/11/18 02:54 AM |
| -22 | “I’m a woman, I’m allowed to”hey buddy. you do realize the men interrupt women way more than vice versa. https://hbr.org/2017/04/female-supreme-court-justices-are-interrupted-more-by-male-justices-and-advocates which does not justify the behavior in this example. It seems important to say this woman is bullshit AND so is the status quo. | /r/MensRights | 10/11/18 02:45 AM |
| 0 | Interestingconclusion b. is the lady holding the sign. "we dont need feminism". I paraphrased "we don't need feminism" to say women are fine; I think its a fair interpretation. If it is power which incites this violence, then you are in agreement we live in a patriarchy. That is the definition. Men have power, and this power corrupts. And if we accept the dominant power group is likely to abuse that power more, How then can you turn around and say patriarchy is benignly good. men may be largely good as you… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 06:37 PM |
| -5 | InterestingI never said men dont have problems. I fully believe men have problems that seriously need to be addressed. Drug overdoses, emotional support, lonelyness, abuse etc.. etc.. These issues have nothing to do with the post or the comment I replied to, which, want to extent somehow this notion of men needing help to feminisim and by extension, somehow, the merits of patriarchy. Yes. Men need help, No that has nothing to do with feminism. Men rule the country last time I checked. | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 05:45 PM |
| 1 | InterestingA true patriarchy with these qualities seems about as likely as true communism benefiting the whole of society... Or let me rephrase it. When have we ever seen this utopia or anything near it. Russia under putin? Saudi Arabia under the Royals? The usa, um ever? Please explain how, supposition a, men dont have shelters for sexual assault (which is bullshit) means that conclusion b. women are therefore fine (despite sustaining the majority of abuse (her words)), makes sense. this compounded furthe… | /r/MensRights | 28/09/18 04:39 PM |
| 1 | 'Boys will be boys' sweatshirt pulled from stores after being accused of sending a 'sexist' messageedit: anyone actually want to talk about this article? lots of just redundant banter, but not much actual talk. | /r/MensRights | 29/06/18 03:20 PM |
| 0 | 'Boys will be boys' sweatshirt pulled from stores after being accused of sending a 'sexist' messageAh yes, the old boys will be boys has no meaning just like the acts covered by boys will be boys has no meaning | /r/MensRights | 29/06/18 12:54 PM |
| 2 | Best initial "red pill" resource?I mean, feminists who are unsympathetic to the pain of other, at least to me are sort of like christian who believe in hate and revenge. ideologically confused. Frankly, not seeing that a suffering man is a problem just makes you an idiot, being a femininist? is just then her excuse for her own shallowness. Im really failing to see how feminism puts an ideological blinder. Regarding "red pilling". The fact that the lens is focused on identity politics doesnt seem to make sense to me. As in (re: … | /r/MensRights | 20/06/18 05:16 PM |
| 2 | Best initial "red pill" resource?Can you help me understand this lecture? two things I didnt understand. One. Why does she refer to herself as a feminist and its her feminism that blinded her to the reality of male suppression. Male issues are seemingly equally if not mostly regulated by other men. Sexual abuse is largely seen by other men as simply lacking balls (there was a thread the other day where this comment was repeated told to the male by other males.), men in the military, workplace deaths, the draft, are institutions… | /r/MensRights | 20/06/18 12:45 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter