TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ieataislopforlunch Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by ieataislopforlunch on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Good point. But I have heard it stated that white women are the greatest beneficiaries of DEI policies
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/25 05:59 AM
1

Your point being? Women shaming men for not enlisting in a particular war doesn't mean women make men fight wars. Plus when it comes to conscription, the ones demanding conscription are men and the ones jailing draft dodgers are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/25 10:43 PM
1

Yes, plus there are a lot of social expectations of people who go to college. I wonder if that might be the "level" some women talk about? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/25 05:39 AM
3

Tf are you on about? Elite men rule during war and peace
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 10:28 AM
1

Ahaha so basically have two desperate people get together
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:06 AM
1

If a man is romantically and sexually unsuccessful into his middle age, what makes you think that someone he's not attracted to will have him?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 01:02 AM
1

What does this mean, get with someone he's not attracted to?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:41 AM
1

The original commenter mentioned being "the odd wheel" with couples they are friends with who have other responsibilities such as "SO, kids, pets, etc.". But for themself all they mentioned was that it sucks to have no significant other. So you're wrong on that count. You still haven't answered my question. Saying "things are expensive" isn't an answer. Ask ask if they're SOL and you say not at all, then fail to list an alternative to the prostitutes. Being in a relationship does not imply kids,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/25 12:08 AM
1

You're dodging the question so hard. I understand what the original commenter said -- I'm just curious what you think someone should do if they don't have the funds to responsibly hire prostitutes? What would you suggest they do? You can say they're SOL, that's fine; I just want to know what your solution is if the primary solution you suggested is untenable
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 11:40 PM
1

By definition no. By the way you never answered my original question. Just because you can't afford an entire family doesn't mean you can't afford to date. You could easily date someone who makes around the same as you and have cheap, fun dates. That would certainly be cheaper than a prostitute. But for men who are romantically unsuccessful they presumably don’t have the opportunity to explore such relationships. In the case that they can't afford a hooker too, what do you suggest for them?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 09:04 PM
1

Where are you getting this hooker/wife, kids dichotomy?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 08:54 PM
1

What about low wage earning single men who compromise a large portion of romantically unsuccessful adults?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 07:49 PM
1

"What women really do" is ambiguous, care to explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:35 PM
2

Also this is illegal in many places. Plus STI risk Edit: And expensive
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 06:13 PM
3

Respectfully, this take is wack. Women dont make men fight, other men do
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/25 12:20 PM
1

It's only a lose lose situation if you're trying to please these people
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:22 PM
1

Good question. None of these things are exclusive to virgins, so they don't make sense as reasons not to date one
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 10:46 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter