| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Men have lost Mischievous energyWow, pretty hot fuckin take there, guy Two cases where dudes picked up the damn hint and wanted to make clear that they were sorry for crossing a boundary way less substantial than forcible penetration or forcing women to watch them whack it Totally wrecked the argument though | /r/seduction | 22/11/17 05:40 PM |
| -1 | NEVER give a girl an easy outyeah, you get it | /r/seduction | 05/10/16 09:01 PM |
| – | NEVER give a girl an easy outManipulation [of a person] is to control unfairly. Seduce is to draw in, to attract. They are very much not the same. edit: y'all, look it up in the fucking dictionary if you don't believe me. there are different definitions but it's clear which definitions op meant for each, and those are the ones that i'm applying. if he'd said, 'manipulate the tools of seduction,' then you could say they're the same. when you talk about manipulating people, you mean unfair control, and when you talk about sed… | /r/seduction | 05/10/16 03:35 PM |
| 11 | 5 of my Favorite Opening Lines (That Actually Work)This would work great at Chuck-E-Cheese | /r/seduction | 09/08/16 03:48 PM |
| 1 | 7 Habits of Alpha Males That Actually Get Them LaidMade it up on the spot. | /r/seduction | 03/07/16 04:44 PM |
| 1 | 7 Habits of Alpha Males That Actually Get Them LaidNumber 3 is a good point, but I would qualify it by saying that there is internal congruence ("what I say matches what I feel") and external congruence ("what I say matches what they feel"), and in relationships, external congruence is more important than internal. External incongruence is grounds for terminating a new relationship. Internal is you needing to deal with your own shit and not make it someone else's problem. For example, I'm currently frustrated with a girl for flaking on follow up… | /r/seduction | 03/07/16 04:41 PM |
| 6 | ELI5: Why have men become so sexually repressed? [Discussion]Yup. White guy seconding. It's like we're everywhere! | /r/seduction | 30/04/16 08:49 PM |
| 36 | A few observations based having only female flatmates - good for guys who put women on pedestalthey all crave a cock. ...you might have a hard time defending this given the whole "lesbian" thing. | /r/seduction | 13/04/16 02:31 AM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusI don't think that the definition used in the NCVS survey categorically excludes male victims. Seems as though it may have in the past, althHowever, I do believe that if a survey prompt is written from the perspective of the definition offered, it would be easy to misinterpret such a prompt as excluding men. So I can see why the data between the two would be skewed, and I think the NCVS can include "envelopment," but I don't think that their definition as it currently functions "categorically ex… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 07:41 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campuspublic discourse discourse does not equal debate I then provided evidence that other agencies within the dept also share the same definition, providing a consistent framework whereas other departments do no not. You demonstrated a revision being made to remove the clause saying, "Men can't be victims of rape." Such a revision supports my point, not yours. I have missed the many agencies that define rape in this way for purposes that extend beyond the collection of data. Of course the agencies wo… | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 07:07 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusBurden of Proof fallacy | /r/MensRights | 07/08/13 06:07 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusWhat are you? I've acknowledged many, many times that I'm not certain what the measure you provided was. I acknowledged long, long ago that I believe that the statistic in question (that 99% of rape perpetrators are male) is misleading at best. What you want is for me to adhere and admit to the ideological supremacy of your argument. Sorry, but your argument has failed. If you want to have a dialogue about common sense interpretations of survey prompts, or bias in survey collecting, we could've … | /r/MensRights | 06/08/13 04:07 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusNo. You have failed to prove that the justice department uses the definitions of "victim" and "offender" that you are pushing. Thus I have no onus to prove that they use my interpretation. This is the burden of proof fallacy. The proof of the pudding is in the eating: The sentence in question is open to interpretation. Neither your interpretation nor mine is wrong. Hence, the law could use some clarification. To claim that it can't protect men from being raped (by envelopment, your term) is not … | /r/MensRights | 06/08/13 03:41 PM |
| 1 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.This feels suspiciously like the Gish Gallop. Except that you've said little to nothing, so it would seem as if you've said little to nothing to be in error. You have dismissed me as if this were agreed upon to be a formal debate. It's not. This is the internet, for god's sake. My only argument, reduced to its most basic terms, was that reality does not always conform to your expectations of reality. If I wanted to debate you formally, I would debate you formally. Such a debate requires research… | /r/MensRights | 06/08/13 02:13 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusAbsence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Furthermore, under current law, women are prosecuted for committing statutory rape (which, no, is not all that different--penetration still has to occur). You yourself just said that different agencies define it differently. You respect the CDC's definition. So...the different agencies argument doesn't help your point. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/13 12:35 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusYour definition would be the sole exception. No, my interpretation is not exceptional. You seem to be misunderstanding how law works. (Future lawyer here, reporting in.) Here's what happened, according to you: Laws (statistical guidelines? Not clear on the purposes of these pamphlets) suggest penetration necessary for rape Old laws/whatever had suggested males could not be raped Old laws/whatever no longer suggest males could not be raped Laws/whatever still suggest penetration necessary for rap… | /r/MensRights | 06/08/13 05:44 AM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusThere is no way to respond to a claim that you are a troll. But I can laugh at how absurd what you said is. | /r/MensRights | 06/08/13 05:12 AM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusIn order to penetrate someone you pretty much have to be a man. In some sense, yes (though I think we'd agree that that's not strictly true). But the definition you gave does not say, "Offender penetrates victim." It says that the "penetration by the offender," which can quite easily be interpreted to mean, "[the act of] penetration [forced] by the offender." In fact, it doesn't quite make sense to me to read it otherwise--not in the way it was worded (and these legal definitions are paid meticu… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/13 04:14 AM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusUm, your inability to make up your mind whether the "Don't Be THAT Guy" campaign demonizes men or sends a positive message. I never said it sends a positive message. I said it seems to be the best available way of delivering the message that men play a part in ending rape, even if it maybe demonizes men. Hell, the "Don't be that guy" campaign doesn't even demonize men. "THAT GUY" is a single person. "THAT GUY" is set apart. Don't be set apart by committing sexual violence. How is that not what t… | /r/MensRights | 05/08/13 12:13 AM |
| 0 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.Men have very few safe spaces or really any emotional outlet. Feelings are a sign of weakness in men and therefore expressing them around others is dangerous. Even (if not especially) around women. I am totally with you on this, but it's unrelated to your former point that reddit is not a "male safe space." men do get ridiculed here for expressing their beliefs. But not for their masculine or male interests. Being told that my belief that chicken is the best meat is wrong has little to do with t… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 11:06 PM |
| 0 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.you feel like that that and you're woman and you feel like that because you are a woman so all women MUST feel the same. Well shit. TIL I'm a woman. except this is a blatant lie and has no basis in reality You're not understanding. i'm a guy. i post on reddit. if i say something stupid or make a joke that is not funny guess what happens? i get downvotes. i have been in a multiutude of arguments and i have been wrong in more than one of them. You're reeeeeeeally not understanding. yes a majority … | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 10:52 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campusForced sexual intercourse means vaginal, anal, or oral penetration by the offender(s). pg 456 though its also on 451 Hm, I'm not sure that that definition does have a directionality. "Forced sexual intercourse means ... penetration by the offender." It doesn't say "Forced sexual intercourse means the offender penetrated the victim." Nor does it say, "Forced sexual intercourse means the victim was made to penetrate the offender." It might not be a perfect definition, but it doesn't really have di… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 10:40 PM |
| 1 | Poster on my campuswhich suggests to me that you're suffering from cognitive dissonance. What the hell are you talking about? Did you ignore the part where I tried to open a dialogue to change the demonization of men in these types of campaigns? Acknowledgement of limitation and open dialogue does not equal cognitive dissonance. In short, they don't reduce the incidence of rape. If that's not the desired outcome, what do you think is? You're not really reading between the lines, are you? See: But they aim to shape… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 10:26 PM |
| 0 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.Thankfully I've never been raped or abused, so I can't say for sure how I'd respond to that. I guess I'd just choose not to associate with those people any more. I don't believe it's other people's responsibility to make me feel comfortable and safe - it's my responsibility to find people who do, and stay away from people who don't. This SCREAMS privilege. Some people either can't escape that targeting, or feel as though they can't. You can't possibly try to apply this to everyone. That's not fa… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 08:42 PM |
| 0 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.You're making a generalization against a huge group of people based purely on gender. Do you think gay men feel safe posting on Reddit? Minorities? Transgendered men? How about men who have suffered abuse, particularly from women? What about the men in /r/ForeverAlone, do you think they'd feel safe posting anywhere else? What about devout Christians or Muslims? You seem to think that every male on here is white, straight, middle-to-upper class, and has no physical, mental, or emotional problems … | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 08:30 PM |
| 0 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.It's very clear that you aren't even trying to understand my argument. (Let me help with that latter one: obese and unattractive men face just as much discrimination as obese and unattractive women - source and source.) This is an asinine point. Discrimination is not equal to great pressure to modify your appearance. Discrimination is only one arm that exerts that pressure. When was the last time a father told his son that his outfit was ugly, or "you need to shave your back," or "you need to we… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 08:20 PM |
| 2 | Poster on my campusThank god you've come along to tell us how we're supposed to feel. My analysis differs from yours. That's all. Who's telling whom how to feel? Hang on a minute - are you saying that the posters actually do this? This is nonsense. No, of course they don't directly do this. But they aim to shape the culture in a favorable way to produce the desired outcome. I think society should stop treating men like criminals for being men. I agree with you, but are you conflating "being a man" with "having sex… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 01:48 AM |
| 2 | Poster on my campusWell, if anyone needs "fixing," it does seem to be men who rape. I'm all with you on the fact that it seems to demonize men as perpetrators, but according to the U.S. Dept. of Justice, the estimate of perpetrators is 99% male. Do I think that this statistic is accurate? Not exactly. Do I think that it is telling? Yes. A very large number of rape perpetrators are male. If anyone needs to be taught not to rape, it is those who have higher likelihood to commit the crime. In fact, I'd say that the "… | /r/MensRights | 04/08/13 12:11 AM |
| -6 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.a comment enforcing traditionally male gender roles Close. More accurately, a comment coming from a "traditionally" or commonly masculine or male perspective. Reading between the lines, this means that it is not coming from a feminine or female perspective. That may seem obvious, but given the vastly different sets of experience that men and women have (men: rarely cat-called, never taught to fear sexual assault walking the streets, not extensively taught to modify their appearance; women: frequ… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/13 09:58 PM |
| -10 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.You look at any post on the front page and go to the comments, they're dominated by masculine comments and commenters. Of course those spaces are male-dominated. We joke all the time about it. We even have a subreddit called "circlejerk." Do you really think women came up with that title with other women in mind? | /r/MensRights | 03/08/13 08:17 PM |
| 1 | I showed my mom (lesbian, man-hating, radical feminist) Karen Straughans video on feminism and the disposable male - she went berserk.As I understand it, trans* is now the accepted term--denoting more than one iteration of trans-(gender, sex) identity, used with "person(s)/people." | /r/MensRights | 03/08/13 06:59 PM |
| 3 | Poster on my campusThis is a blatantly poor analysis. Don't be that guy is a pretty good one. It sells the idea to men that male sexual identity is fundamentally toxic, except for one or two good men. That's not what it says at all. Actually, it suggests more that the male sexual identity is fundamentally non-toxic. "That guy [who commits sexual violence against (presumably) women]" is a stand out. Why? Presumably because he deviates from acceptably masculine characteristics. While I understand and agree that ther… | /r/MensRights | 03/08/13 06:53 PM |
| -21 | /r/feminism and the magnificent circle jerk.Men have literally BILLIONS of places where they can post anything they want and nobody will EVER argue with them I think that your sarcasm is simply ignorant of the demographics of Reddit/the Internet community and culture. | /r/MensRights | 03/08/13 06:44 PM |
| – | Female Coworkers Chat With Kids Frequently Every Day; I Say "Hi" to a Woman's Kid Once and Get ReportedI think (and this is really just conjecture) that kingsway8605 (honestly, I'm not even sure) maybe was being (who REALLY knows?) sarcastic. | /r/MensRights | 06/02/11 10:25 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter