TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iehava Archive

View 12 posts and 259 comments by iehava on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It appears to use a lot of the same information, but the post I was looking for had a website that had a whole bunch of drop-down menus to select characteristics from, to see what percentage of the population fit their criteria.
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 07:10 PM
1

Was like a year or two ago, but it may have been reposted.
/r/MGTOW04/10/18 03:03 PM
10

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:46 AM
25

You don't go to prison for losing a civil case.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 06:24 AM
2

Cool. So how's your weekend?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 07:30 PM
9

And I have a problem with a member of the public violating the law, resisting arrest, and then assaulting a police officer at least three times before finally getting hit back, regardless of their size, strength, gender, race, or anything else.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 07:21 PM
9

So you have no issues with a suspect, regardless of sex, trying to fight the police and kick them? In other words, if a suspect kicks an officer, are you saying the officer shouldn't be able to hit them back to subdue them?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 07:17 PM
8

So if a man had run from, shoved and kicked an officer after having acted as belligerently and rudely toward him as this person, you're saying you wouldn't have an issue with the police's actions?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 07:00 PM
24

I was going to downvote you, but then I thought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt that you really don't know, and offer an explanation. Personally, I don't think we should make a huge deal about under-21's drinking, but the law's the law, and here's why she's wrong: She told the cops that she was 20. Being underage and in possession of alcohol is a crime (MIC). When a police officer has reasonable suspicion or probable cause of a person committing a crime, that suspect MUST identify themselv…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/18 07:25 AM
0

That's pretty racist.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/18 10:54 PM
5

And that automatically tells you her party affiliation? Do you actually believe you can (or even should try) tell what a person thinks because of their accent and dress? So a black guy in saggy jeans and speaking Ebonics is automatically a thug too, by your logic.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/18 08:59 PM
7

Then why have inner cities been under Democratic control for decades? Welfare seems to be the answer many people give when asked how liberal policies help them, and it may help in the short term, but it the long term, excessive welfare harms minority families.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/05/18 02:25 PM
10

While it's not an unbiased source, the content of this video is relevant and all completely true. And I find it funny that you didn't address any of my other points - namely that the Democratic Party has a storied history of racism, and that today it's still there, just subtle.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 04:28 PM
11

? The Democratic Party is the party that overwhelmingly voted against ending slavery, giving freed slaves citizenship and the right to vote, started the KKK as a militant wing to suppress the black vote, and as recently as 1964, 60% of Congressional Democrats voted against the Civil Rights Act. Now the racism is more subtle: If you think differently, you're suddenly a "race traitor", or "uncle tom". If you don't think a certain way, there's something wrong with you - women who aren't feminists a…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 08:30 AM
9

JP has so much fucking patience.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/05/18 08:11 AM
2

Here's my opinion: We need actual, sound, scientific research on false rape allegations. There are a handful of credible studies out there, all of which show a very high rate of false reporting. We need credible social scientists (of whom there are few) to do proper peer review on bullshit "studies" that feminists and their allies produce on the subject. We need to continue to debunk the "rape culture" hysteria, particularly on college campuses. We need to push for police and anyone else who tak…
/r/MensRights29/05/17 07:43 AM
3

It's absolutely true in practice. And if they violate your constitutional rights anyway, none of their evidence will be admissible in court as it was illegally obtained. What's not true in practice is that people don't know their rights, don't know how to competently assert their rights, and don't know things like the fact that police officers are allowed to lie in order to make arrests.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/17 04:06 PM
10

If an officer sees an air freshener in your car and you're acting nervous, that's enough to justify "probable cause". No it's not. To satisfy probably cause (which would be the threshold for an arrest), there needs to be clear and easily articulable facts that to a reasonable person would constitute the probability that this person is, was, or is about to be involved in a crime. If probable cause was satisfied, she would be in handcuffs, being arrested. Notice how the Border Patrol agents said t…
/r/PussyPassDenied20/04/17 10:38 PM
7

While I know many hard working women, I also know plenty of girls that would get guys to do their homework for them. Whenever there's an assignment they suddenly start getting super flirty and play the damsel in distress. These types skate by because there's almost always a guy willing to let them copy or just do it for them. Guys do not have this option, which is what I think the above poster was highlighting.
/r/MensRights10/03/17 05:10 PM
3

Bull-fucking-shit. Until proof is provided that this sub is not compromised, we have to now assume that it is. To me it seems much more reasonable to believe that the sub has, in fact, been compromised, and that this "retraction" is just a false flag made to make it look like any future incidents of this sort can be shrugged off as, "Oh look, they must be pulling a prank too." I see an admin has weighed in, but I still call bullshit. We know beyond any reasonable doubt that the admins are comple…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/17 08:15 PM
13

He is very likely innocent.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/02/17 10:26 AM
6

INJURY TO A CHILD? What the fuck kind of bullshit charge is that?
/r/MensRights17/01/17 10:21 AM
9

Judge Judy denyeth.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/17 11:21 PM
1

Lol the false-flagging is real by /u/tmone and OP. Nice try.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/01/17 08:45 AM
2

This isn't really sexism. The reason females are given straws is that they wear lipstick, which gets all over the glass (also it messes up their lipstick). When it goes through the dishwasher, sometimes it doesn't come off. Source: I work in a restaurant.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 09:11 PM
2

I understand what you're saying, and I even agree with you about the EPA stuff. I have even said as much: Personally, I more or less disagree with the aim of their suits, but the fact that they sued in no way means that they are disqualified. I also said, in my original post, that you could argue that the reasons for the lawsuits would make him unfit to be in charge of the EPA, but what she said was simply that he sued the EPA - no context - and that alone disqualifies him. So again, I don't thi…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 07:58 AM
1

Yes, but as the video says, so did the majority of states. And just because they sued the EPA doesn't mean they were wrong in doing so. Personally, I more or less disagree with the aim of their suits, but the fact that they sued in no way means that they are disqualified. Here's an analogy: If I'm a state Attorney General, and I sue the DoJ on behalf of my state over what I think is a miscarriage of justice, does that automatically disqualify me from later being appointed as U.S. AG, and running…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/12/16 07:36 AM
2

Then what was the point of even posting?
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/16 07:48 PM
2

I am not a Trump supporter. Saying that you won't offer facts means you probably don't have any to back up your claims. If you don't value evidence, I have no interest in continuing this conversation.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/16 06:10 PM
2

The CTR is strong with you.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/16 03:13 PM
2

? If you have some evidence, please present it. I'm more than willing to change my mind.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/12/16 02:59 PM
1

So you're saying that he should allow a person to make unsubstantiated and some flatly false claims without backing them up with evidence? Ok.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/12/16 07:53 PM
13

How can someone counter a claim of something that probably doesn't exist? You've heard of Russel's Teapot, or Sagan's Dragon, yes? In both cases, a person claims something with no evidence, and their argument for its existence is that you can't disprove it. Utter nonsense, and it deserves to be pointed out. At no point did Tucker make any claims, he - again - demanded that she substantiate the claims which she made, which is exactly what any person should do.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 07:19 PM
4

She makes several claims which she doesn't corroborate with any evidence or logic. He simply points this out and demands that she substantiate her claims.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 06:58 PM
6

What? Compares Trump to Hitler? Not rooted in fact. Steve Bannon is a white supremacist and anti-Semite? Not rooted in fact. The claims she made about the EPA nominee were so obfuscated with cheap talking points, and empty rhetoric, while being taken out of context that it would take quite some time and effort to get to the bottom of them (which is why she says them: most people will just take the statement at face value).
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 06:57 PM
31

He doesn't have to counter her arguments, because that which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. She needs to substantiate her claims, which is what he was pointing out.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/12/16 06:53 PM
1

It's a near certainty that they will find out where and when the event is. My guess is that they will simply wait until like the day before to release the venue and time to limit shenanigans. Or maybe give longer notice for when the showing happens but release the venue later.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:16 AM
1

In the U.S. it is only legal to use enough force needed to stop someone in self defense. However, culturally your opinion is generally accepted. I have heard that some States have a "mutual combat" defense, and lots and lots of prosecutors recognize one informally. Yes, hitting someone and knocking them out is generally accepted as "enough force". Again, in the example of a 120-lb guy vs a 230-lb guy, there's no question that hitting back is completely fine. You're defending yourself from bodily…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 01:53 AM
3

Hmm, I guess I didn't see him spitting on her when I watched the video before, which pretty much changes everything about the incident for me. Spitting on someone is assault/battery (depending on jurisdiction), which makes her hitting him back justified and removes his justification for hitting her later. You're right about the Ray Rice incident, but in a general sense, I think we still have a disagreement when it comes to a male hitting a female back. I don't agree with what you said about a "d…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 12:10 AM
3

She was slapping, punching, clawing, spitting and kicking for a full five minutes before he defended himself. Being larger than your attacker doesn't make the retaliation "disproportionate", nor does it cause him to surrender his right to bodily autonomy. It only makes her an idiot for attacking someone twice her size.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 10:13 PM
1

Lol get triggered.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/10/16 08:53 PM
1

Please re-read what I wrote: Here's more or less what we DO know: Two officers felt that this man posed a potential threat to them, enough that one of them deployed their taser, and another used their gun when the taser didn't work. It wasn't just one cop. They tried to taze him, but tazers do not always work. Sometimes the barbs don't attach, sometimes the person is high on PCP, etc. My speculation is that he was about to reach into the car, one officer tried to tase him but the taser failed, s…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 05:29 PM
2

I won't downvote this post because it deserves discussion, but the last thing we should be doing is jumping to conclusions. This is especially true when we consider that the main media sources pushing the "Black Lives Matter" narrative are the same ones pushing the feminist one. Notice that the media is portraying him as an upstanding, church-going man, studying music at his community college. Notice how the only pictures they show of him are flattering images of him well-dressed in church or so…
/r/MensRights21/09/16 08:22 AM
1

What the fuck is that title?
/r/PussyPassDenied21/09/16 07:30 AM
6

Wow, what the actual fuck did I just read?
/r/MensRights06/09/16 07:36 AM
7

A better analogy would be actually nibbling on the burger while saying you don't want to eat it.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 04:45 AM
7

$175k? That's it? The damages should be in the millions, easily, especially considering damage to the guy's reputation.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 09:43 PM
4

Ahhh yes, the sharp "crack" of equality early in the morning.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/16 03:32 AM
6

FYI, it appears that it is a person in the SUV, on the passenger side that throws the soda.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/08/16 05:16 AM
3

Am I wrong to be cautiously optimistic?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:44 AM
2

They have Erin Pizzey and Warren Farrell in the documentary. I doubt that.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:44 AM
1

I'm pretty sure that she didn't think that the horse wouldn't kick her because she was a female. I'm pretty sure it doesn't care, and she thought it wouldn't kick her because she's an idiot. Her sex has no bearing on this, whatsoever.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/16 05:58 AM
2

How the fuck is this PPD? Gtfo.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/07/16 04:25 AM
1

Lady? I see no Lady here. CPS should fucking take away her child, holy fuck.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/16 01:21 AM
9

There actually is a correlation between conservatism and attractiveness. There's a link to one of the studies related to this in the second link I've provided. http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/the-gop-has-a-feminine-face-finds-238867 http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/people-who-think-theyre-ugly-more-likely-to-be-liberal
/r/MensRights19/07/16 04:21 PM
11

The worst part about this is, if she had been willing to continue the lie, some random dude who did nothing wrong would have caught kidnapping and rape charges, while she cries to her husband. Hope they don't let her off lightly.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/16 02:09 PM
6

I don't think it's in uniform reg, either. Yet somehow she's a spokesperson...dafaq?
/r/PussyPassDenied16/07/16 02:07 PM
1

I also go to ASU and more and more of this shit keeps going on. File a Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 06:18 AM
0

Wow, your mental gymnastics are Olympic-level. You essentially compared me to the people in the three videos, all of whom were self-loathing of their black side; and assumption that in no way fits me. If you can't see this, or any of the other points I've made, I won't waste any more time, or crayons, trying to explain it to you.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 10:18 PM
2

So there's a few black people out there that don't "claim their black side" or hate that they are black etc. So what? There's probably millions of white people who do the same thing (mostly SJW's). If you'll notice, I said nothing other than, "I'm black and I agree with X,Y,Z." See, the irony here is, you and people like you have an obsession with race, which reveals you as the actual racists. In fact, you're guilty of the worst kind of racism: you assume that just because I am black, I should a…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 08:54 PM
1

Got it, so I'm a black white supremacist. K.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 10:01 AM
1

Hi, I'm black and I more or less agree with /u/Paul-milana . So many of the so called "police brutality" cases involving black people happen when a black person refuses a lawful order or generally doesn't cooperate with police even as far as it is their civic duty. And the media and the general public have an outcry whenever an unarmed black person is shot by police, even if it ends up being completely justified, so don't tell me that cops just get away with shit because they are white. How you'…
/r/MensRights09/07/16 09:15 AM
6

How many times did she push and shove and slap and try to interfere before they finally pepper sprayed her? One warning is all she should get, then bam, spray her. And AFTER they subdue the other guy, they should have arrested her.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/07/16 06:18 AM
26

That's not PPD. She repeatedly pushes an officer and slaps one of them in the face. If it was a man, they'd have him on the ground, in cuffs, with charges, in 5 seconds flat. While the "spiciness" is somewhat satisfying, it's hard to imagine a male getting so many warnings and so much leniency.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/16 09:18 PM
2

Blunt force to the kidney-area is a tool that causes minimal damage, yet is very useful. When you get hit in that area, you reflexively bring your arm down to your side to protect that area - it's incredibly hard to stop yourself from doing so. Additionally, if you watch the video, you'll see he didn't even knee her that hard, just hard enough to trigger the reflex. When the second cop shows up, he TRIES to leg sweep her, but it fails to bring her down. She's violently resisting, won't give them…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/16 09:32 PM
17

I mostly lurk on this sub, but this really caught my attention. I am also a black male, and I've had similar experiences all my life. Just about everyone, (ESPECIALLY other black people) assume that you are a certain way, simply because you're black, and if you don't conform, you're "acting white". Fuck those people.
/r/MGTOW25/06/16 02:43 PM
2

Yes, this is the intersectional, SJW redefinition of the words "racist" and "sexist". The actual definition of, say, racism, is essentially a belief that one race is superior or inferior to another. There is nothing about "power structures" or "oppression", etc. As you've noticed, they change their definition for the exact reason you've pointed out: they want to make it so a woman is unable to be sexist, and a "person of color" is unable to be racist.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 02:24 PM
34

Despite how many times I've seen this, I could never not upvote it.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/06/16 06:57 AM
1

Then you should have no problem linking said documentation.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 06:58 PM
1

I wasn't aware that he had (source please?), but still, yes, not even a person who has argued and advocated for this to happen to other people.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 05:14 PM
4

I detest Ghomeshi, and think he kind of deserves this ordeal based on his advocacy in the past. Wtf? No one deserves the ordeal of being falsely accused of something they didn't do, with the potential consequences being prison time and/or their life being ruined.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:04 PM
9

What the fuck is wrong with you? It's feminists who have the #KillAllMen hashtag, not people against feminism. Get your head on straight.
/r/PussyPass23/05/16 01:39 AM
10

It's actually Portland Community College. I went there for a couple of semesters back when I lived in Portland, and it is mostly taxpayer funded, actually.
/r/PussyPass23/05/16 01:36 AM
1

Yeah, I think you've got that backward. Usually with alleged "partner rapes", the allegation is done as revenge. If you read what we can of McDowell, and also the later Kanin study, two things are pretty clear. The accuser claims a rape occurred in order to get revenge on or punish their partner for whatever reason, and usually they don't report these allegations to the police; they just tell friends and family, hoping to damage their partner's reputation and turn people against them. A concerne…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:46 AM
1

The 14.7% "false" rate includes admitted deliberate false accusations, and cases that the complainant withdrew from by claiming to have lied (which is a common occurrence with partner rapes). There is no indication that most or even many of the 14.7% was partner rape accusations. Not sure why you've said this. There is no mention of cases where something happened that did not meet the legal definition of rape, so presumably those were classified as false too. What? Where did you get this from? T…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 09:03 PM
0

I wish you people would stop saying that I'm equating speech to physical actions. I'm not, and I never have been. Not once did I say that words kill and not once did I say that a person being a raging cunt gives someone an excuse to hit her for slurs. I said that when you've repeatedly tried to physically attack someone, and then just moments later you come up to their car door screaming, it is reasonable to assume that this person might attack you. Stop straw-manning me, please.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 08:41 PM
1

From http://www.mediaradar.org/mcdowell_kanin_credible.php#webbs_book_appendix_b take a look at the second paragraph. Dr. Charles P. McDowell of the U.S. Air Force Office of Special Investigations led a team that investigated 556 rape allegations. The initial research categorized 220 of those allegations as true, 80 as false, and 256 as inconclusive. When they announced their initial results, they'd categorized 46% of their data as inconclusive. This strongly suggests that their approach was cau…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 09:19 AM
1

You don't even understand Stand Your Ground laws. It's not a catch-all defense for shooting someone who attacked you, you have to be able to prove your use of force was not excessive and yes, you do have to prove that escaping was not a better option if you shoot someone. No, you're the one who doesn't understand Stand-Your-Ground. It means that you have no duty to retreat if you are not breaking any laws and in any place that you are entitled to be (in public, for example), and that physical fo…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 07:07 AM
2

Do you understand what you're reading? Why are you focusing on the point of the use of a gun when there was no gun involved in the video? It's the reductio ad absurdum, obviously. It doesn't matter that no gun is involved, it the legal principles involved are the same. Even then, the law requires you to rule out escape and non-lethal force to defend yourself, no matter how you're being threatened. A white trash whale screaming at someone through a window does not present an immediate threat. The…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 04:01 AM
-1

See my edit, in italics.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 03:26 AM
5

Except that, as I said above, she was repeatedly going after the guy physically and had to be restrained by the truck driver. That, plus going up the way she did to the car after they got into it is a completely reasonable grounds for menacing.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 03:26 AM
6

There are laws against Menacing. You do not need to verbally threaten a person with physical harm. Aggressively approaching a car and screaming in a person's face after you've repeatedly tried to go after them physically (recall the first portion of the video where the truck driver kept holding her back) would be more than sufficient. http://definitions.uslegal.com/m/menacing/
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 01:39 AM
0

That's not entirely true. If a person has a gun and tells you that they are going to shoot you, they are committing a crime, called "Menacing". For example, here's the Oregon Statute on Menacing.. EDIT: This is the same if a person comes up to you aggressively and tells you that they are going to hit you, or even if they don't speak but act in a way that reasonably puts you in fear of imminent physical harm. Here's a more general legal definition of Menacing as well. You're in legal, you should …
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 01:36 AM
6

Her demeanor and body language is what I was referring to.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 01:31 AM
-1

Wrong. Once again, we'll use the example of a gun. You do not have to wait for a person to shoot you if they are pointing a gun at you to act. If it is reasonable to think that a person means to do physical harm to you, and you have clearly articulable reasons for this, you can absolutely use preemptive physical force.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 01:10 AM
3

Good day
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 01:05 AM
5

The threw it when she was walking away, your argument is invalid. Pointing a gun at someone is considered assault, talking shit to someone is not. Otherwise every case of assault could be 'I was defending myself because he said some shit'. Don't be stupid You're straw-manning me. I never said talking shit was something that could justify violence. I said: If a person comes up to you being openly threatening and aggressive, it is absolutely reasonable to assume that they mean violence, and the la…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 12:53 AM
2

For the third time in this thread you've made this comment and it is incorrect. Stop please. She came up to the car and was threatening them, after they had gotten back into their car. Aggressive behavior of that kind is reasonably responded to with preemptive physical force. If a person comes up to you being openly threatening and aggressive, it is absolutely reasonable to assume that they mean violence, and the law and courts agree. If you point a gun at someone, it is absolutely reasonable to…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 12:24 AM
2

You have the right to subdue a person to protect your property in this situation. As far as I can tell, if there's no context we've missed, the black dudes are completely in the right here. It would be very hard to see the fault even in throwing a drink at someone who has approached your car aggressively, and is screaming in your face and threatening you and won't leave you alone after you've gotten back into your car in an attempt to deescalate/leave.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 12:23 AM
12

You're making this comment all over this thread, and it's wrong. She came up to the car and was threatening them, after they had gotten back into their car. Aggressive behavior of that kind is reasonably responded to with preemptive physical force. If a person comes up to you being openly threatening and aggressive, it is absolutely reasonable to assume that they mean violence, and the law and courts agree. If you point a gun at someone, it is absolutely reasonable to assume that they mean to sh…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/16 12:16 AM
19

No, she came up and was threatening them, after they had gotten back into their car. Aggressive behavior of that kind is reasonably responded to with preemptive physical force.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/05/16 11:53 PM
1

I'll send an email to AVFM this week, but if they don't have it, it may take a FOIA request to get it. I'll let you know if I get my hands on it.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:49 PM
1

Thanks for the follow-up. I already have most of this information, but I was specifically trying to get my hands on the full McDowelll study. I think you suggested in a thread to write AVFM to see if they can provide me with their copy of the study they got from a FOIA request, which I suppose I'll do. Thanks!
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:15 PM
2

No. In my restaurant today, they were doing a free dessert for mothers on Mother's day. I asked my manager if we do something similar on Father's day, and he gave me a look like I was being silly and said no. Just out of principle, I decided I wasn't going to give out any desserts unless specifically asked to do so by a guest.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:49 AM
–

I never said he was a racist, and I said nothing about illegal aliens. Don't put words in my mouth. I said fuck Donald Trump, and I said it because he is an lying, greedy, egomaniacal, slimy, vulgar, erratic, self-aggrandizing narcissist, who has absolutely horrible policy positions on most issues. Despite all the hype about his "business credentials" he has left a litany of awful business failures in his wake; he describes his name as what is most important, which means he doesn't actually do m…
/r/MensRights08/05/16 04:31 PM
–

Fuck Donald Trump. I guarantee we'll see headlines linking Trump to the MRM, and that's the last thing we need.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 07:02 AM
1

The recantation / unfounded (no-crime) issue is explained here: http://www.calcasa.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/OR-SATF-Paper-on-False-Reports-1.pdf This is not an academic paper, study, or survey. Their definitions do not necessarily have any bearing on surveys that use the same words. This can be ignored. Survey of false report surveys, with a detailed rebuttal of the MRA favourites 1985 McDowell (60% false!!), and Kanin 1994 (41% false!). This is worth reading all the way through. http://ww…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 10:36 PM
1

Oh, which modern research are you referring to that they was ignored?
/r/MensRights29/04/16 09:56 AM
1

Would you mind linking the sources here? I'd like to take a look please.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 05:05 PM
1

Will there be an English translation available for the whole study?
/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:21 AM
11

I like her, but she also is a climate change denier. She's spot on when it comes to feminism, but not so much one other issues.
/r/PussyPassDenied18/04/16 08:02 AM
2

You're the one who can't seem to articulate a simple, sensible question worthy of an answer.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/16 05:44 AM
2

I have no idea what definition of sexism you're using, nor could I have any idea what definition you're using; I am not a mind reader. But here, let me help you Even using your...interesting...definition of sexism, please tell me how I was sexist. At no point did I say anything that even remotely appears to follow even your definition of sexist. The following comment makes no sense: Why would you be in possession of evidence that sexual assault occurred? I can give you a serious answer to this q…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/16 03:19 AM
3

Are you serious or are you just a troll?
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/16 02:11 AM
3

I think that because there is no evidence that suggests that any sort of sexual assault occurred. And what is sexist about this: On a side note of little consequence, Kesha's music makes me think she is exactly the kind of girl who uses her vagina to get what she wants and to get out of trouble, even if it means claiming a sexual assault to get out of a contract. For reference, sexism is: The belief that one sex (usually the male) is naturally superior to the other and should dominate most impor…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/04/16 01:16 AM
7

Tasers are nowhere near 100% effective. If the person has a potentially lethal weapon and is coming toward you like this, you only have time to draw a taser OR a gun. Tasers have 1 shot to hit, and you can easily miss. They can malfunction, they can hit but the barbs don't always attach, or the person can be relatively unaffected even in the case of a solid hit - say if they are high on PCP or something. A gun almost certainly ensures that the person will go down. As far as I can tell, the cop d…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/16 02:42 AM
1

That's why I said, it was a side note of little consequence.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/16 05:51 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights07/04/16 05:50 PM
1

Verbal assault? What?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 09:56 AM
219

I'm not sure why this is getting downvoted, as this is 100% PPD. What I think happened here is Kesha wanted out of her contract with no repercussions, and the only way to do that is to show that the other party breached the contract, or with criminal wrongdoing on their part. There is no evidence that suggests - in the slightest - that either of these things happened, apart from what Kesha says happened. We have no reason to believe her story over his. On a side note of little consequence, Kesha…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/16 06:29 AM
5

:D
/r/PussyPassDenied03/04/16 06:08 AM
7

THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 10:15 PM
9

Wait...Shae was a pornstar?
/r/PussyPassDenied02/04/16 09:49 PM
1

I have seen a case where some mild fingering for less than a minute showed on a rape kit as possible sex had happened because of tearing. And I was in the U.S. Army for 6 years, and let me tell you, girls don't always trim their nails. In the military, girls are still girls, and still do girl things. Don't let the uniform fool you. LC Heslop, who claimed the pair had consensual sex, said she inserted a total of four fingers and also performed a sex act. The more fingers, the more likely she is t…
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/16 05:18 PM
1

Vaginal tearing is expected even with just regular sex and fingering, and bleeding can happen too. Especially if it is one girl fingering another, and cuts her with her nails. I'm not even remotely convinced that this was a rape.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/03/16 11:13 AM
5

I like this. I am using this. This is mine now.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 12:20 PM
10

"6 of the top 10 highest-traffic Everipedia pages are people of color. Why? BECAUSE WIKIPEDIA DISCRIMINATES AGAINST PEOPLE OF COLOR.." Wtf?
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:43 AM
1

False accusations of sexual assault ranges from 6-41%, depending on the study you read. Meanwhile, all other felonies are around 2%. I'm on mobile right now but I'll link the studies when I get home.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 09:36 PM
5

I don't see a PP denial here. On top of that, I'm really, really skeptical of the evidence. It sounds as if it were a simple she-said, she-said situation. The article mentions absolutely no evidence other than the alleged victim's testimony. I'm sorry, but unless there is some other evidence that supports the accusation, I think that it is entirely possible that this is a miscarriage of justice.
/r/PussyPassDenied21/03/16 09:25 AM
3

The only thing that really bothered me about the documentary was at the end where they simply portray Mangum as a helpless victim of mental illness. In fact, throughout the entire thing, the only person portrayed as malicious was the prosecutor Mike Nifong, and slightly the one police officer, Mark Gottlieb. Even when falsely accusing people of rape, and it's proven that it is a false accusation, somehow the woman is still a victim and only men are at fault.
/r/MensRights15/03/16 08:21 AM
1

Great, thanks!
/r/MensRights15/03/16 03:59 AM
2

Anyone know where I can find a link?
/r/MensRights14/03/16 06:50 AM
9

Wrong. If you read the article, you'd see that the mother was a bitch, and the article cites observational evidence of her reading a ~10.68 on the cunt scale.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/03/16 12:49 AM
3

I'm fairly certain this is sarcasm.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/03/16 03:26 AM
2

Yep! No macaroni noodles allowed. :P
/r/MGTOW02/03/16 02:02 AM
0

Not trying to be a dick, but what does this have to do with MR?
/r/MensRights01/03/16 08:39 PM
1

I had a day off work, so I didn't get out of bed until 1. I currently have a broccoli, cauliflower, and chicken cheese casserole concoction I made in the oven. I'm still sore from the gym yesterday, so I'm gunna go for a bike ride once it cools down. Other than that, I plan on doing absolutely nothing productive today, and it feels great.
/r/MGTOW29/02/16 10:09 PM
1

You misunderstand me on several points. If I am a student I am paying By this logic, any student can get any teacher fired. So if everyone held the opinion of "shut up and get away from me because you are wrong" where would we be in the world? She can hold that opinion, and can voice it. Free speech is about a marketplace of ideas; where, as long as everyone is free to voice their opinion, no matter how deplorable, or even just outside the norm it is, the best ideas win out over the long-run. I …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/16 10:13 AM
1

You're not paying her to teach anything. The university decides that, not you. Perhaps her view on media and journalism isn't one that embraces an absolute view of free speech. And, perhaps, the university finds value in having people around with dissenting viewpoints. Isn't that, in and of itself, something we would want - even if we disagree with those viewpoints? Free speech means that even those whose viewpoints we disagree with, we have to let them voice those viewpoints. No professor shoul…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/16 03:47 AM
1

I disagree. She is a professor of media and is voicing a viewpoint that many people disagree with, including you and I. She has the right to use her free speech rights even to attack free speech itself (ironic, no?), and I will support her right to do so. No professor should be fired simply for voicing an unpopular viewpoint. Lately, we've been having tenured professors at universities be fired or forced to resign because they said something that feminists disagree with, even though the professo…
/r/PussyPassDenied04/02/16 01:35 AM
12

No, I think what he's saying is that he can't respect people who can't take jokes and demand to be sheltered from words. This tends to be women. Probably a bit of an over-generalization on his part, but the sentiment is quite valid.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/02/16 09:43 AM
12

I'm not sure if you're trolling or serious. Nobody is saying that. If you were falsely accused of something you did not do, would you like to be given the benefit of the doubt at least until you've had a fair trial? If it's how we would want to be treated, it's how we should treat others, no matter how much we don't like them.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/16 02:14 AM
13

This. If (when) she is convicted, she should lose her job and have a criminal history that follows her. Let's not get carried away and forget that we have a legal system that ensures due process.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/01/16 01:02 AM
2

What? You're like a youtube comment come to life.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 06:54 PM
3

So someone asking for evidence is now dumb. Got it.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:22 PM
3

I'm sorry, but if you're claiming that there is an actual quota, I want to see the direct evidence for that claim. Let's not do what feminists do and simply circle-jerk and believe things without commensurate evidence.
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:12 PM
1

And don't forget that the Obama White House is ALSO threatening to stop funding colleges that don't expel some quota of male students every year over false accusations. Can you link this?
/r/MensRights27/01/16 03:18 PM
2

And any post that is like that usually gets downvoted to hell. Like this one.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/01/16 12:31 PM
5

When she was about to run into the cop car at the beginning, the cop denies the PP and does EXACTLY the right thing; he pops two shots off at the driver. She was lucky she wasn't killed then and there, and afterward the cops did exactly the right thing by tazing her and dragging her out on her ass. I don't think she used her vagina to try to stay out of trouble though, she was just high as fuck - so I'm not sure it's PP.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/15 10:32 PM
3

How is this PPD?
/r/PussyPassDenied04/11/15 01:00 AM
23

Cmon we all know boxing gloves protect hands not people, lets you hit them harder. That said obviously he didnt go full out. Now him vs rhonda rousey would be a worthy battle of the sexes even under rules and shit. No, you need to compare like with like. If you're picking someone like Rousey (and sure she could probably beat up most guys), who might be the best female fighter in the world, you need to compare that with the best male fighter in the world. Do you think for even a second that Rouse…
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/15 09:21 PM
33

She STILL hasn't felt it. This was in a ring, with boxing gloves, and rules, and a referee who continually interrupted the fight, etc. In the real world, if a man and a woman like these two are fighting and trying to harm each other, she'd be dead in 30 seconds or less if it's what he wanted to do.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/15 05:03 PM
204

See, the problem here is that she, like most females, have never felt the full physical power of an adult human male before. When we see females picking fights with men, hitting them, etc., we can confidently say that they wouldn't do such things if they had.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/10/15 01:59 PM
3

Real MVP.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/09/15 08:21 PM
3

If they fired you for raising a legitimate concern, you don't want to work for that company anyway. And if they did that, you could sue them for wrongful termination too.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 08:04 AM
42

30 days in jail? If this were reversed...
/r/PussyPassDenied10/09/15 10:14 PM
1

Is there a link to the study?
/r/MensRights01/09/15 03:33 PM
19

..."Equality law"...
/r/MensRights01/09/15 03:13 PM
-3

I disagree with this vehemently. Charging her with menacing or something similar (threats to cause harm, etc.) is fine, but not hate crimes. The last thing we should be doing is making and enforcing laws that make it illegal to have certain thoughts - even if they are despicable. Fuck this woman, but fuck hate crimes/speech laws too.
/r/PussyPassDenied31/08/15 09:08 PM
9

I would gladly support any movement of gender equality. Feminism is not such a movement.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:07 AM
1

what you are suggesting to verify the rate is effectively impossible That has been my point the entire time. When a rape is reported, the only way we know for sure that a rape happened is when we have a crime scene or a conviction (a crime scene can show that a rape occurred, but not always who did it, and having a crime scene for a rape claim is rare - especially an unreported one; a conviction should show us that a rape occurred beyond a reasonable doubt). So in the absence of these things, us…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 04:44 AM
1

I did not read the follow-up, so thank you for point that out. And while I appreciate the discussion as well, I will continue saying this: The only way to ensure that the 2/3 (or whatever number) is accurate, is to put the claim through an evidentiary judgement. Otherwise, the results are tantamount to being meaningless, and I will not trust them - and neither should anyone else. If we trust this number, it is tantamount to saying that as soon as a person claims they were raped, we should believ…
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:03 AM
1

I only showed you that study because you asked for a reliable source that would at least shed light on the rate of false reports. While it has only 109 data points, if you read the actual study, you might be more inclined to believe it based on the fact that this data was gathered over a ten-year period, and the way the data was gathered. Anyway: 1) I never said you should be filtering out false unreported claims. I said, and am continuing to say, you cannot know the number of true claims or fal…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:27 PM
1

Here is what i can say after reviewing the BJS surveys I'm inclined to accept the 2/3 under reporting, this does not mean that my estimates are as accurate as possible. If you use the 2/3 under-report figure, in spite of the glaring flaws I've just pointed out to you in this and the last thread, I see no reason to trust any of your other figures, any more than I would trust the figures from someone who uses the 1-in-5 "statistic". The 2/3 "under-report" figure you're using is egregiously fatuous…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 02:29 AM
1

Douse the main sail and weigh anchor, kid. She's invoked the right of ...parsnips...? Parsley? Partner?
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:33 AM
2

I am also calculating that there is a 2/3 non-report rate[3] This is a bogus statistic. There is absolutely no way to know the number of rapes that go unreported. The way that they get this number is by anonymous survey, in which people respond and claim that they have been raped and did not report it. Several problems: Of the 2/3 "unreported" cases, the only evidence we have is hearsay from a person who claims to have been raped, and/or by using a definition of rape that is not warranted - whic…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:16 AM
1

Good. Offense is taken, not given. Happy cakeday.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:03 AM
1

An upper limit is absolutely meaningless in this case. We could use the same logic to say that because 2 out of 32 (6.25%) reported rapes will result in jail time, that an upper-limit estimate of false rape reports is 93.75%. See how that's absolutely insubstantial, if not completely pointless? There's no way to know that the 2/3 number is accurate. Of the 2/3 "unreported" cases, the only evidence we have is hearsay from a person who claims to have been raped, or by using a definition of rape th…
/r/MensRights17/08/15 12:02 AM
1

But your perspective is "we" looking at the victim. That "we" cannot say that anyone was raped isn't relevant to the victim if in fact the victim was raped. That we cannot prove the victim was raped doesn't mean the victim wasn't raped. I think you misunderstand me. I am not saying that because we cannot prove that the alleged victim was raped that it doesn't mean that they weren't actually raped. I agree with that statement wholeheartedly. I am saying that because we cannot prove that an allege…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:54 PM
2

I agree with most of what you're saying. I failed to notice that RAINN wasn't saying "out of every 100 rape reports, only 2 rapists will go to prison" and that they automatically assumed that all 100 cases were definitely rape. However, I still think the 32% number is likely to be somewhat accurate. Maybe it's wishful thinking but I would think that the surveys used made it clear they were talking about actual forced sex and not "some guy was looking in my direction and I felt weird about it", a…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 10:13 PM
1

I'm not sure what you mean. Are you saying that freedom of speech does not equate to freedom to offend? Are you saying that people have a right to not be offended?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:31 PM
1

I applaud the analysis but there is a difference between something actually happening and being able to prove it happened beyond a reasonable doubt in court. That is my entire point. Just because you can't prove it, doesn't mean it didn't happen. Also correct. Any case in which there is no report, no arrest, no charge, or no conviction is a case in which we are between 0 and 98% certain that the rape occurred. Thus, we cannot say that anyone was raped for certain
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:30 PM
1

Yes, according to anonymous surveys. These are the same surveys that give us the 1-in-5 numbers. Without to fact-finding process of a trial, there is no way to differentiate between claims of rape and instances of rape. Period.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:27 PM
1

I agree in principle, but how can we stop someone from being influential? I think it highlights the hypocrisies and logical contortions needed to justify many popular feminist positions. Either way, I think that the last thing we should be doing is trying to limit the ability of someone to wield influence or abridge their free expression - even if they are self-described rapists. When someone says something like Schumer, their reputation takes a hit - and hers most certainly has. The problem is …
/r/MensRights16/08/15 05:22 PM
5

Reversing genders is a useful tool to expose hypocrisies, incoherencies and double standards, I agree, though I'm not sure why that is relevant with respect to what's been said so far (let me know what I might be missing here). Roosh is a hateful piece of shit, but I don't believe that restricting his free speech, however odious it may be, the correct solution. You see, you had an experience of the exact sort I talked about, above. You "hate-read" his ideas, and went to his seminar. As an observ…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 09:04 AM
2

Just reading the page you linked me nearly gave me cancer. This is the same bullshit from the usual feminist "academic" circles - they conflate "rape" with "people who say they have been raped". You also need to figure out what they are using as a working definition of rape: Drunk sex + regret, or sex obtained by force or coercion, or some other definition. Here's what they are saying: There are 100 rapes that happen in a certain sample size. 68 go unreported. We "know" this because people say, …
/r/MensRights16/08/15 07:28 AM
9

Many people also don't realize that just two years later Oliver Wendell Holmes was regretting his decision in Schenk. Even fewer realize that the reasoning in Schenk itself was faulty: If someone yells "fire" in a crowded theater, this doctrine is implying that the people in the theatre are no longer responsible for their actions and have no further agency in events. If I hear "fire" and intentionally trample a person in my rush to get out, I am not absolved of guilt, agency, or responsibility f…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:58 AM
17

Personally, I have a problem with this idea of "hate speech" being something bannable or illegal. It poses all sorts of problems, and enforcing rules against hate speech is likely to do more harm than good. I believe that all speech and expression, no matter what it is, who says it, or how odious, deplorable, or hateful it is, should be protected free speech. Any time you make a law against certain forms of expression - let's use someone who is racist against black people, for example - you are …
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:47 AM
2

How do you know that 2/3 rapes will go unreported?
/r/MensRights16/08/15 06:16 AM
4

Another good source for this is the Loyola Law Review. From The Truth behind Legal Dominance Feminism's Two Percent False Rape Claim Figure: One highly respected legal academic, elected by her peers as president of the prestigious Association of American Law Schools, recently reported that "the overwhelming consensus in ... research relying on government data is that false reports account for only about 2 percent of rape complaints." It is indisputably true that, largely through the efforts of l…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 08:33 PM
3

Here's a pretty good article that summarizes the CDC report on intimate partner violence. Here is the 2010 report they are citing. The findings and data has been replicated and updated in the intervening time, as well. I noticed you asked about convictions, though. If it wasn't enough to treat male victims of DV as if they don't matter, the justice system also treats women preferentially - often even after women are convicted of crimes, they avoid jail time. Here is a 2010 report on Domestic Vio…
/r/MensRights02/08/15 09:45 PM
1

I'm in the U.S.; it's just so mind-boggling that there isn't a way to petition government for redress of grievances.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:11 PM
1

Sue. There has to be some way to overturn an unjust law in Australia.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:22 PM
3

Sue the absolute shit out of them. Someone, please.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 09:44 PM
1

The reason I say that there is a range of incidence of false reporting from ~6-40% is that different ways of determining what constitutes a false report are used, depending on the study. I also don't believe that the average large college campus has 5-10 reports of sexual assault per year. Just using FBI statistics that say 6.1 per 1000 (.61%) women will be raped, and that college women are 20% less likely to be raped than non-college women. Let's say we have a college campus of 50,000 people, h…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:37 AM
2

I'd assume ~8% (slightly higher than fraudulent complaints of other types) in the city and potentially much higher on college campuses. If there are 5-10 complaints of sexual assault on a campus in a year, if even a few are false, that's double digits. And that's the demographic where they would tend to be the highest in general. Don't assume statistics. No empirical statement of fact or statistical relevance can be obtained from a sample size of "5-10". All of the studies I am referring to have…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:12 PM
3

The percentage of false reports range range from 6%-41%, depending on the study.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 05:42 PM
2

You da real MVP.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/15 05:44 PM
6

No. She raises a fist and threatens to hit him. Restraining someone who is threatening you is not unreasonable.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/07/15 12:38 PM
3

And how soon until Feminists want to say that not only is the MRM a "hate group" but any discussion that advocates the MRM (or is critical of feminism because it supposedly stands for "equal rights") is considered hate speech. Furthermore, this means that you have to accept that there is some arbiter, some person or group of people who get to decide for me, you, and everyone else, what constitutes "hateful" speech and expression, or what is deemed speech or expression unfit for me to hear. No: A…
/r/MensRights03/07/15 02:13 AM
10

That's not what this is at all. Read some of the things this woman has written about male suicide.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:42 PM
15

Have you read the things this woman has written? She trivializes and belittles male suicide, in such ways as: "That young men succeed in suicide more often than girls isn't really the point. Indeed, the more callous among us would say that it was quite nice for young men finally to find something that they're better at than girls." and, "No one is "in favour" of suicide, but when we interfere with people's right to take their own lives, we are on very dangerous ground. The level of pain that mus…
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:41 PM
20

While I agree that she and what she has written here is absolutely disgusting, the very last thing we should be encouraging is criminalizing any sort of speech or expression.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:31 PM
11

Oh? And you know this how? She says those things about other men and we have no reason to doubt that she would say the same about her son.
/r/MensRights02/07/15 12:22 PM
6

Nothing Judge Judy could do about that. Every bit of denial she could do she did.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/15 11:41 PM
3

This is the one, thanks!
/r/PussyPassDenied29/06/15 11:34 PM
2

Hi, postgraduate Astrophysics student researcher here. I can tell, just by reading what you've written, that I have a much better understanding of what constitutes scientific language, claims, evidence, etc. than you do. I'm not saying this with any conceit; I'm saying this because you are an idiot, and you should be told that you are an idiot, and why. I use language that references scientific discoveries that doesn't mean I am making a scientific claim, well not yet. This is what you said. I w…
/r/MensRights18/06/15 12:40 AM
4

If you're using scientific language but not making scientific claims...wow. What a statement. Don't dress up your wild speculation as science. Also, most decisions that most people make on a day-to-day basis are based on evidence.
/r/MensRights17/06/15 04:22 PM
16

And, like...not even a good lie. That's a lie that is insulting to peoples' intelligence.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:15 AM
32

"She claimed during her trial that she was standing behind her husband when he was on the computer and he ‘hit out with his arm’. "That, she alleged, knocked her off balance and the water spilt out of the jug as she span round." ...Really?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:25 AM
5

I's black.*
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/15 02:45 AM
3

So that's your response: throw out some hypothetical situations that don't apply in this case, and copy and paste an article? Hypo..hypoth...What? Did you even click the links I provided for you? These are not hypothetical situations. These HAPPENED. I gave you links to the news stories. There's even fucking VIDEO of the women falsely accusing the taxi driver in the first one. Apparently you don't understand sarcasm. And, I think its quite rich of you to say that Emma was raped then offer no evi…
/r/MensRights07/06/15 03:55 AM
6

Emma Sulkowicz was raped. The fact that multiple women who don't know each other are accusing him is pretty much proof positive of that. The number and composition of accusers does not necessarily prove that someone is guilty of a crime. While it does build a circumstantial case of a person's behavior, when three separate people accuse someone of three separate crimes, each needs to be proven individually. But since it seems to be a "numbers game" with you, please, consider the following: Let's …
/r/MensRights07/06/15 01:45 AM
5

Not sure if troll, deeply sarcastic or serious. If you're serious, let me know so I can correct you. If you're one of the former, joke well played.
/r/MensRights06/06/15 11:52 PM
2

I sincerely hope this is sarcasm...?
/r/MensRights06/06/15 11:26 PM
-1

[Citation Needed]
/r/MensRights05/06/15 06:41 PM
1

As most others have already said, there is no need to apologize. There are other women out there as well who feel like you do, and many others who are oblivious but nonetheless don't buy into feminist ideology. I will say this though: We need you. We need you, and women like you, who see what is really going on and are willing to say something. When men talk about Men's Rights issues, criticize feminism, or call out sexism against men they are not usually taken very seriously. But when there are…
/r/MensRights14/05/15 02:46 AM
-1

Being nervous is not a reason for detainment. Detainment means that the officer had a reasonable suspicion, based on clearly articulable facts, that if they search this person that they will find evidence of some sort of criminal activity.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/15 09:03 AM
1

I'm not arguing that. If you were a woman who is being told by feminists that the patriarchy is real and that men are trying to keep you down, and you see a video like this, you may agree with them, despite or IN SPITE of the facts displayed, simply because of the presentation. Furthermore, if you're a person who's tumbled down the rabbit hole and is investigating things, a video like this is likely to turn you off from that search. There are plenty of smart people who believe untrue things for …
/r/MensRights27/03/15 12:18 PM
1

I think s/he means "why women think they need to fight for equal rights in some areas." His/her use of "woman" in place of the correct, plural, "women" shows English is probably not their first language.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:55 AM
2

What does any of that have to do with the "jokes" he made? Just because one woman fucked him (and worked the system to that end) means all women are/should be prostitutes, phone sex workers and/or sleep around for promotions? Come on. A lot of shitty things have happened to a lot of undeserving people on this sub, myself included; going around saying things like that is the equivalent to a feminist saying all men are "XZY" or all men do/should do "XYZ".
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:51 AM
1

While the information he presented was accurate as far as I know, his attitude is a massive turn-off. I don't care what his background is, what has happened to him in the past, etc. Even if it a joke, saying that women can only sleep around to get a promotion and that they should be doing phone sex or prostitution is not helpful in a video trying to convince anyone who thinks there is $.77/$1 pay gap of the actual truth on the subject - if I was a feminist and wanted to find an opposing argument…
/r/MensRights27/03/15 11:49 AM
1

There is a reason that the MRM has more unforced-homogeneity than feminism. It's the same reason that Atheism has more unforced-homogeneity than religious people. Unforced is the key word in with both - because feminism routinely villifies, ostratizes and banishes those who deviate from or disagree with their mainstream ideology in exactly the same way many religions do. Most of us have looked at the evidence and come to similar conclusions over it. Feminists and the religious have only looked a…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 08:37 AM
2

That is generally true, of course, but that doesn't mean that we should take a simplistic world view. Feminists hate the moderators of /r/askfeminists. There is a lot of evidence to demonstrate this. Like I said before, there's enough points that are really strong with which we can point out problems inside feminism, there's no need to venture out from there. "Leaders are indicative of the followers" is as simplistic a 'worldview' as "Feminists hate the moderators of /r/askfeminists." Again, thi…
/r/MensRights17/03/15 06:42 AM
3

Another story that should be done is about how men accused of sexual assault are actively denied due process. Either way I'm glad MSNBC is paying attention to this.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 09:25 PM
-6

Yes they do.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/15 10:43 PM
5

But with the Ray Rice thing, despite the fact that video showed that she hit him first, several times, they couldn't wait to comment on it and suspend him. It shouldn't just be simple assault, it should be domestic abuse as well.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/15 10:40 PM
9

Feminism has continuously advocated the degradation of due process for men in sexual assault cases. There is no other crime where a person would be convicted soley on the testimony of one accuser and no corroborating evidence (not even circumstantial).
/r/MensRights06/01/15 07:06 PM
0

This video is obviously staged. I didn't see or hear the woman screaming "STAHHHHP" anywhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/01/15 09:20 PM
1

The second source is very good but I can't use the one for the 15% exoneration rate. It's not from an accredited news organization/scholarly article and the study that they linked has disappeared. =\ EDIT: Also, the 42/58% numbers are from the UK, yes?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 07:22 PM
3

Civil disobedience would be staging a sit-in. This is way beyond that.
/r/PussyPass27/12/14 07:11 PM
2

Do you have a source for these? I know it can be a pain to track this down but I would really appreciate it.
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:01 AM
1

Do you mean to say that 15% of rape cases eventually clear the defendant of wrongdoing, or that 15% of convicted rapists are found later to be innocent?
/r/MensRights27/12/14 02:55 AM
2

The point, I think, is that it's not so much about the PM being in any actual danger. It's more that these women did this and haven't had any repercussions that I've heard of - whether immediate or after the fact. Surely what they did was a crime in Belgium (in the U.S., this is Battery, but even in Belgium the fact that they ruined two peoples' suits and a carpet, and should at least have to compensate those people for it. Nobody should be able to do this to anyone, least of all an elected offi…
/r/PussyPass26/12/14 06:58 PM
3

Did they pay for the suit (both the PM and one of his security guys) and the carpet? No? Why not?
/r/PussyPass26/12/14 02:35 AM
4

Credit to /u/atheist4thecause for the original post. I am fucking shocked that they were able to walk the fuck out after doing this to someone, especially the Prime Minister of their country. If it was men doing this, it probably would have been way different. Un-fucking-believable.
/r/PussyPass25/12/14 08:19 PM
16

So they get to throw things and squirt things on a person and just walk away? In the U.S. this is battery, I'm not sure what the laws are on this in Belgium, but at the very least they are responsible for ruining at least 2 guys' suits and the carpet. Why should the Belgium taxpayers have to foot the bill for this? Hold these fucking women responsible. Also, I imagine things would have gone differently if this was men doing this. Fucking straight up pussypass.
/r/MensRights25/12/14 07:57 PM
2

1) My outrage isn't to do with the creation of this group, per say. I've specifically said, several times that was the case. 2) My issues with it are: The language the professor used The absolute bullshit article she linked as impetus for the group's formation, filled with fabrications, distortions, tortured logic and utter nonsense The implicit insinuation that men are not "safe" The idea, asserted by the article and presumably by the professor as she claimed it was an "excellent article," that…
/r/MensRights04/12/14 01:36 AM
3

Yeah, and I can definitely see that it may benefit women in PS. That's really not my main gripe though; it's what I listed before, mostly about what would happen if I did something similar for men and how the professor went about it (i.e. the article she cited [the call to "balance" genders in STEM fields] and the "safe place" language). Edit: Spelling.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:25 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights03/12/14 02:21 PM
1

Analogies. Analogies, everywhere.
/r/MensRights03/12/14 12:57 PM
3

Stupidity does not reduce your ability to grant consent. Lack of mental faculties, sure. There are holes in his story such as the report that there were two witnesses who did not intervene. If this was a female claiming she was raped, and there were two witnesses who did not intervene then I would be skeptical. To me, it more closely fits the pattern of two people having consensual sex, and one party regretting it and trying to "take back" consent. Or his story could be true, or the truth could …
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:58 AM
10

I was just commenting on /u/BigThucydides 's questions s/he had for me, and exactly this crossed my mind. If a female is studying Planetary Science, a male-dominated field, isn't she handicapping herself for later a bit by not learning to cope in the environment? The comparison I drew was: This would be like a male studying nursing who lacks experience dealing with women and instead of learning while in nursing school, segregates himself. I guess we could also stick with the analogy of a white g…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:45 AM
5

Great questions, let me try to go at them one-by-one. I'm very open to having my mind changed. Would you say that you're offended by the idea of the 'support group' itself, the fact that it was inspired by an egregiously unscientific article or both? I'm shocked that your professor would do something like this on the basis of such a plainly stupid piece of writing. However, I don't personally see the problem with setting up a women's group. I am in no way offended by the idea of a "support group…
/r/MensRights03/12/14 11:33 AM
5

I would be laughing just as hard if I could scrape my jaw off the floor...
/r/MensRights03/12/14 09:29 AM
2

Bullshit. This isn't an argument about personal responsibility, it is an argument of bodily autonomy. I fully support a woman's right to get an abortion, but I also think that men should have an "opt-out" clause as well. For example, say a man and a woman have sex and she gets pregnant. As long as she lives in a not-backward-ass state, she can get an abortion if she chooses, whether or not the man agrees. The problem with this, as you tried to point out, is that if the man doesn't want the child…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 09:03 PM
1

So?
/r/MensRights17/11/14 11:39 AM
2

The last three bullet points were only supplemental to the first; that because you would have to commit a felony to knowingly not register, you could almost certainly lose your right to vote for a long period of time if not indefinitely.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:42 AM
3

Yes, but this overturned a Federal Court's decision that due process rights of men had been violated. The Supreme Court's reasoning was that because the purpose of the Selective Service was to create and maintain a pool of potential armed combatants, and the fact that women were excluded from direct combat roles, that they agreed that women could be excluded from the Selective Service. Now that the combat exclusion has been ended, there is absolutely no excuse. Period.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:25 AM
2

You are partially correct. Failure to register for the Selective Service can still have an impact on your right to vote. If you fail to register with the Selective Service: It is a Felony under US law, punishable by up to 5 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. In many states, this means that that person no longer has a right to vote (or in some states, a long period of time must pass before they can regain the right). You cannot, in most states, obtain a driver's license. This makes it, in state…
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:22 AM
1

Actually, this would be the quickest way to have abortion as a fundamental right for all women. If we classify a fetus as a person, issues of bodily autonomy come into play, and the fact that you cannot force a woman to allow another person to utilize her body without her consent. This is actually why, even with Republican congressional majorities several times in the last two decades, this hasn't happened. Edit: Spelling
/r/MensRights17/11/14 08:01 AM
3

If you can demonstrate that the accusations were false and that the persons accusing you were doing so knowingly, I would find a good lawyer and sue the living shit out of your ex and her parents. Defamation, emotional distress, court and lawyers' fees for fighting the bogus accusation, child support, etc. I know you may just want it to be over, but if you're struggling because of them and through no fault of your own, you owe it to yourself and your children to do so.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 09:03 PM
1

Credit to the original poster, /u/seuftz
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:33 AM
3

It says it only has 9 users per month, so I'm not sure that's the right one. I don't use any facebook apps, so is there a way to block every app? The video in that link is old and Facebook no longer has that option there. EDIT: Nevermind I found it here.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:28 PM
2

pm sent
/r/MensRights13/08/13 08:23 PM
2

Haha thanks for trying.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:27 PM
2

How can you block it? Also, how can you be sure that it is actually blocked?
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:27 PM
3

Names and faces of the protesters will later end up on a “registry” website of female “offenders” alongside other images of women charged with crimes such as murder, false rape accusations, sexual assault and child molestation. Anyone know what "registry" is being referred to here?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 11:31 PM
1

Ya several people have posted many different ones ITT. http://pubpages.unh.edu/~mas2/ID41E2.pdf so far is my favorite because it provides data tables that you don't have to dig through a wall of text to find.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:26 PM
1

Several people have linked studies so far, including user "truthjusticeca" that was exactly what I was looking for. The study says that while most domestic violence is reciprocal, female-on-male domestic violence is more common than male-on-female domestic violence by nearly a 2 to 1 margin on average.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:16 PM
1

Absolutely. We start the module next week. I'm really hoping that there is no need for me to speak up, but if I do, I'll absolutely post a follow up.
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:13 PM
1

Exactly. Do you have a link to this study?
/r/MensRights19/10/12 06:11 PM
3

That is an interesting point of view, and again, I absolutely agree with you in principle. Yes, it is an undergrad course. What I'm saying is that if I were to say, "Perhaps sexual assault is not a crime of violence, but a crime of sex, because it exists in the animal kingdom as well," I would get shouted down. This in no way diminishes your contentions about the classification of rape, but the last thing I want to do is to in any way seem like I am downplaying the severity of rape as a crime. F…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 11:31 PM
2

I'm completely in agreement with you on what you just said, but my concern is that if i simply say what you've just said (while true), without actual evidence to back it up they will try to say that what I'm saying isn't true, and i'll have no way to back it up.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:57 PM
7

I must respectfully disagree with this as a priority. While they are worthwhile questions, they are philosophical in nature and any meaningful answers to which would be anecdotal at best.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 10:05 PM
3

0_O thats a lot of stuff. wow lol
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:39 PM
2

Thanks, exactly what I was looking for on domestic violence.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:37 PM
1

Interesting. Now, I remember seeing a study somewhere that the majority of domestic abuse is initiated by women, but i cant seem to find it. And as for sexual assault, I'm more concerned with non-relationship sexual assault and statistics on false accusations. I remember a while back someone posted something that indicated that nearly half of rape accusations were false or mistaken accusations.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 09:23 PM
17

Immediately, TODAY, invest in a tape recorder. The next time she goes crazy, turn it on and record. If she starts getting violent, breaking things, getting in your face, etc., immediately call the police. Make sure that you are at the door to greet them when they come in. If she is there with you, go outside and wait. Do EVERYTHING in your power to talk to the police before she does. As they come up to your apartment, tell them, "Officer I need your help. My girlfriend is completely drunk and go…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:58 AM
0

You're just repeating your logically fallacious arguments. Repetition doesn't validated it. I've already explained to you several times why its NOT rape. You're very determined to condemn both OP and I, as a rapist and a rape defender respectively. I honestly don't know why I even tried to make you see sense when you're clearly either egotistically or ideologically entrenched in your opinions, but I'm going to stop because I feel like I'm losing brain cells.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 01:41 AM
1

I was simply pointing out the flaw in your logic: That while intoxicated, she could not have been blacked out intoxicated when this happened and still say she 'remembered' being 'raped.' Those two, are obviously mutually exclusive. You're also missing the larger point of my posts. I am not advocating, in any way, taking advantage of someone while they are drunk and you seem to be focusing on misconstruing my comments to mean such. I am saying that when both people are equally (or anywhere near e…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 09:23 PM
-1

You're a complete idiot. The girl initiated it, first of all. She said 'we shouldn't do this' because she was there with another guy, not because she didn't want to have sex. You're completely twisting things to support your own false conclusions. Either that or you didn't read the post.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:44 PM
-1

Did you even READ the post? She wasn't having flashes of it the next day, nor was she blacked out while they were having sex. She not only initiated, but obviously she 'remembers' everything if she claims she was 'forcibly raped.' Then she and her friends stay the night and leave the next morning. Does that sound like a rape victim to you? Also, I never said she sobered up enough to give consent, I said she sobered up a bit, which meant she was probably on par with the same level of intoxication…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:41 PM
4

Seriously man, have no fucking mercy whatsoever. I really, really hope that you don't need any convincing to go after this girl in a ruthless, merciless fashion. That's justice. Good luck with everything man. EDIT: Also, just noticed your shockingly appropriate username. Good on ya.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:56 AM
3

Ya, thankfully you didn't talk to them and insisted on a lawyer first. So many people aren't smart enough to do that or think it will 'make them look guilty' etc. Just out of curiosity, if you're in the US, what state are you in?
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:13 AM
6

I have been falsely accused of rape as well, but luckily the detectives saw through it and I didn't even get arrested and no charges were ever filed. I'm really sorry you had to go through this and if I were you I would sue her for the false accusation. Have no fucking mercy, whatsoever man. This girl could have ruined your life over something you didn't do, and whats worse? She did it because she didn't want some guy to be mad at her? How can not wanting to feel bad be a competing interest with…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:10 AM
0

You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:06 AM
3

Ya, state attorneys or DA's will put on as many charges as they possibly can, even ones they KNOW won't stick. The reason for this is they want you to see the massive potential sentence, and then cut a deal to save their time and the state money.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:06 AM
2

They sobered her up, first of all. Secondly, OP was very drunk as well. If that is your logic, he has just as much right to file charges against her. Don't be an idiot.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:04 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter