TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ignigenaquintus Archive

View 4 posts and 379 comments by ignigenaquintus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
24

He isn’t conservative, just in 2016 he was all for Bernie Sanders. The main topic he is conservative is regarding trans women athletes. He seriously has bought in some misandrist ideas, and the guy mocks men’s right activists claiming men don’t face serious sexism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/24 06:14 PM
27

Yes, but it’s more difficult and the sentences are significantly lighter. The minimum sentence in the case of a man is double than if you are a woman. Also if you are a woman there are benefits and subsidies that you get just by making the accusation, regardless of outcome. On top of that, just by making the accusation, you ensure you get the full custody of the kids after divorce. Again, regardless of if he is not-guilty. There is a ton of stuff more, like getting nationality and stuff if you a…
/r/MensRights24/08/24 11:58 AM
37

We have all met countless feminists millions of times.
/r/MensRights20/06/24 01:31 PM
29

Not conservative at all. ElPais has always been the leftist newspaper in Spain, it’s just that in the last decade or so appeared others much more left. ELPAIS always supports PSOE (the socialists).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/05/24 06:12 AM
3

I really couldn’t care less about so called “representation” in media, if anything I have started to find it a little bit cringy with all those stereotypes and embedded ideological propaganda. How many not stereotypical gay men are there in media? Their idea of representation is a reductionism dressed as a virtue. And if I want to watch a gay romance I do that rather that clap for their idea of what being homosexual means for them, from mannerisms to ideology. Only gay men (with a single excepti…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 01:24 PM
1

I don’t know if it is the same technology but it could be. In any case the key is when a professional assess the specific treatment after some tests. Regarding what was for send me a chat request.
/r/MensRights30/03/24 08:45 PM
2

It’s sort of a machine with some glasses that make you see light patterns and headphones for sound that produces hypnosis while you are not being necessarily unconscious/sleep. I know, sounds sketchy as hell, it works tough. I know it not just for personal experience but for 5 other people that did it after I did. It treats the symptoms from the very beginning, whether those symptoms are in the personality or the emotional state, etc… again, no expert, but a clinical psychologists that does neur…
/r/MensRights22/03/24 05:04 PM
1

Audiostrobe neurofeedback therapy helped me. I used to believe that psychologists just didn’t help. If I were you I would look for a clinical psychologist that uses this kind of therapy although this is just based on my personal experience and I am no expert. It truly changed my life even thought I went there out of desperation thinking there was no way it would help.
/r/MensRights22/03/24 11:57 AM
80

In Spain feminism already showed their true face in legislation 20 years ago. There are over 400 benefits, by law, if you are a woman, and 0 benefits, by law, if you are a man. Most of them are economic, but there are some that directly discriminate in terms of sentences if you are a man, like for example in cases of domestic violence the minimum sentence if you are a man is double than if you are a woman irrespective of the severity or duration of it, etc… (those other variables are independent…
/r/MensRights12/03/24 11:16 AM
6

Me for example.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 02:24 PM
2

Amen. I am also disappointed in her.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/08/23 12:22 PM
6

In fact if you exclude the effect of lower percentage of women as part of the chess community there is still an unexplained difference between the real number of elite female players and the expected number of elite female players. And yet if you ask most chess players they will tell you they have heard the whole difference was explained by it.
/r/MensRights15/04/23 09:59 AM
1

In the 60s we really did completed a total swap between biological reductionism to social reductionism. Everyone assumes it must be social pressure unless proved otherwise, and most people keep claiming it’s social pressure even in the cases we know it isn’t. I don’t know what it is in this case and I agree with you it may be interesting looking at neonatal babies differences. I am just venting I guess, like morphological differences usually are fundamentally biological, that should be the obvio…
/r/Male_Studies15/02/23 01:27 PM
-6

I partly agree with you. It didn’t used to be this way. Group identity is infectious. I have a post years ago predicting this trend.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:50 AM
2

Sorry about the joke. I liked the video. Maybe it would be interesting to know how does he believe that the MRA came to be considered inherently right wing in the first place (once it does these things kind of become a self-fulfilled prophecy). My take is that feminism actually oppose to the idea that men’s issues are relevant or deserve visibility as well as the idea that we aren’t born as blank pieces of paper (blank slate) and therefore they immediately portrayed it as inherently misogynistic…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/23 08:47 PM
1

Ssssshhh, shut up, I am actually currently listening to you asking an important question like right now. 😉
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/23 08:35 PM
1

From a social constructivist or from a social constructionism perspective? Like the former somewhat implies the later but the later not necessarily implies the former. In either case I am concerned as those perspectives are social reductionism either directly or assume social reductionism and we know that’s against the literature in psychology and sociology and cognitive psychology and implies the assumption of discrimination as the only way to explain differences of outcome between sexes at a s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/02/23 08:12 PM
2

There are many. Search for the literature of in-group bias. Men and only in regards to sex is the only category in which people don’t have inherent in-group bias. Evolutionary psychology explains it due to men (and males of all sort of species) competing between them for mating.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 06:33 PM
4

From a micro level there can be nasty behavior against each other, reputation destruction and the like, but from a macro level there is a lot of group identity mentality, class conscience that Marxist would say, but with gender, so gender conscience.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 10:00 AM
10

There are studies about how this work. It isn’t low IQ, it’s an array of psychological effects we all human have, psychological compartimentalization and the like. In fact, individuals with higher than average IQ can become pretty good at deceiving themselves. There is an experiment in which a group of people was asked to make decisions while their brains were being monitored, and the researchers could see the activity going on in the brain. The researchers were able to know when someone had mad…
/r/MensRights27/01/23 01:55 PM
35

The problem isn’t intelligence, it’s cognitive distortion. Two very different things.
/r/MensRights27/01/23 11:11 AM
9

I read that in the 70s or 80s, there were 2 liberals per non liberal in both psychology and sociology. In the 90s it was 3 years o 1. Nowadays is over 20 to 1. There is something that psychologists call minimal group paradigm. It studies the minimal conditions necessary for discrimination to exist in the sense of making that environment not welcoming to a sub-group. Whatever those minimal conditioned were, they hit hard in both psychology and sociology a couple decades ago. Papers are review dif…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/23 01:19 PM
-1

I mean, I don’t think that many people would have a problem marrying an exsexworker. But a current one makes the relationship more tricky as it’s going to directly impact your sex life.
/r/MensRights20/01/23 09:26 AM
1

It’s the same kind of reductionism than social reductionism (strong version of social constructionism), but on the other side of the nature va nurture topic. It’s called biological determinism. Imo we should understand three things: The differences between the averages of two different groups is always going to be much much smaller than the internal variance of each group. This implies that expecting to know anything about any individual based on their group is statistically ignorant. The fact t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/01/23 08:42 AM
1

In Spanish: Un tío blanco hetero, experto en igualdad.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 07:23 PM
1

Let’s not conflate women with feminism.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 02:06 PM
6

Agree. It could happen the other way. The problem with these voting systems is that no matter what anybody can claim is due to bias. At the same time this highlights how if we want true inclusivity the only single unit of category we should have is the individual, so everyone is included, rather than do it based on sex, skin color, etc… Maybe there are categories that are based on sex rather than gender? Like in sports? Perhaps bathrooms? are pronouns based on gender or on sex? It gets confusing…
/r/MensRights16/01/23 11:27 AM
8

Any solution would have to come by understanding first that there are biological pressures at hand. The literature on in-group bias is particularly interesting. It helps people understand that while tribalism has biological causes and it’s applicable to all “groups”, there is an exception to tribalism and that is men in regards with sex, so men lack the internal mechanism to generate in-group bias in relation to sex. Meaning that, on average, both men and women have more empathy for women than f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/23 01:01 PM
6

It is indeed fucking insane.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/23 12:55 PM
11

All right, but AT don’t have political power, and the different branches of feminism that have any kind of social/cultural relevancy have political power, and every single one of them demand this under threat of accusing you of being a bad person. I can separate myself from both AT and feminism, ok, in the case of AT I can do easily and completely, in the case of feminism it’s influence shapes both culture and politics, and their message is ubiquitous, so if I have children I can’t protect them …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/01/23 11:32 AM
6

It’s not just that they apply an obvious composition bias, pretending that a very small subsample is representative of the whole, but the fact that men lack an internal mechanism for in-group bias related to sex, meaning the few men at the top don’t give a damn about other men wherever they are. In fact those other men are seen as failed competitors by that elite, but competitors non the less.
/r/MensRights11/01/23 01:30 PM
1

Inclusivity is perfectly ok when it is done at an individual level, but not when we define individuals by grouping them. I am deeply against group identity of any kind, and if inclusivity means anything it should be defined by a concept of diversity that is not defined externally to the individual. I have been in this subreddit since it had 1/10th of the size it has today. To me MRA is necessary because feminism isn’t about equality and nobody brings visibility to social problems if those proble…
/r/MensRights08/01/23 10:22 AM
1

I have been here since this subreddit was around 30000 or so. I think people should take these posts seriously, the average member has changed over time. When people from other subs that were censored came here that was the wet dream of some feminists that have been trying to portray different perspectives as the same thing, and of course then judge it by it’s worst examples, the usual composition bias with which they justify concepts like patriarchy. I am telling you, the discussions and the po…
/r/MensRights07/01/23 10:14 AM
1

I think it brought a great deal of awareness to social issues during the last century. It helped rethink to which point the differences between men and women were purely biological (sadly they went full the other extreme making the same mistake but with social reductionism).
/r/MensRights23/12/22 01:13 PM
9

Spain has laws that discriminate against men in issues like domestic violence. Minimum sentences for those crimes are double than when women are the perpetrators. There are special courts that exclusively judge men accused of these crimes, also you can be found guilty just with the declaration of the accuser, without any kind of evidence but her word, if the judge consider say declaration credible. If you have been accused but found not guilty, you still loss your chance to maintain custody of y…
/r/MensRights15/12/22 02:01 PM
1

We can’t assume a person about to commit suicide is thinking rationally. When you are in pain you want it to stop, and all the ideas that come to your mind are twisted by the emotions. For all we know he chose that place because he had good memories as a child and wanted to relive it, the sounds and whatever. I don’t think most people will think about anyone but themselves once they have made up their minds they are going to kill themselves, specially when he must feel as if the person that love…
/r/MensRights07/12/22 11:49 AM
2

Her friends she invited probably.
/r/AntiFeminists21/11/22 01:09 PM
2

Both men and women have more empathy for women. There is a ton of evidence in the literature about the topic. Evolutionary Psychology or Gen-Culture coevolution can explain why this is the case. It’s not that women have more empathy for women than for men, is that men being the single exception to the common in-group bias makes us also have more empathy for women than for men. It’s not just women, it’s not just men, it’s not culture or society, unfortunately it has an evolutionary basis and ther…
/r/MensRights10/10/22 01:28 PM
4

They simultaneously hold the believe that crimes are like diseases and therefore they can expect a 0% criminality rate while believing that until that 0% isn’t achieved is ok to generalize. Absurd bigoted believes to justify hate.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:10 AM
4

This is the kind of guy feminism would like MR be associated with. We didn’t knew the guy till feminism used it to shit on us with their usual and flimsy guilt by accusation of proximity, and now we see posts of people claiming he is a so called MRA? He is a misandrist, it’s just that he wants to compensate bias against men in our societies with traditional roles that, in terms of fairness, would equalize society using the lowest common denominator, meaning bias against all. To support this guy …
/r/MensRights06/09/22 08:25 PM
6

What bothers me is this: “You can ask an audience to believe the impossible, but not the improbable” https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=WSoD https://tropedia.fandom.com/wiki/Willing_Suspension_of_Disbelief You can believe the opponent has laser in her eyes if the world in which it is set has such cybernetic technology, but if she has a diarrhea attack at the precise moment she engages in combat, that destroys your suspension of disbelief. You can ask the audience to believe a dragon…
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:20 PM
1

Liking dicks isn’t enough, trust me, either you say the “right things” or you are cancer, even more so because they feel betrayed.
/r/MensRights23/08/22 12:34 PM
21

There is not a single man in that movie that is not either extremely stupid or extremely evil.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 06:02 AM
1

The problem is the insidious nature of the narratives that are proposed by feminism as inherently necessary to defend trans people. Feminism proposes the hard version of social constructionism, gender is a social construct and only that, there is no trace of biological pressure on gender, both men and women start as white sheets of paper. This is false, there is a biological pressure on gender, and there are differences in the averages between those two groups in regards to tastes and interests,…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:56 AM
1

I agree with you on the essence, empathy, but the problem is the insidious nature of the narratives that are proposed by feminism as if they are inherently necessary to defend trans people. Feminism proposes the hard version of social constructionism, gender is a social construct and only that, there is no trace of biological pressure on gender, both men and women start as white sheets of paper. This is false, there is a biological pressure on gender, and there are differences in the averages be…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:22 AM
3

To a certain extend I agree with you, there are sustancial differences between cultures, but you have to understand two things, first, there is an empathy gap, there are many studies about this, both men and women have more empathy for women than for men, so the fact feminism exist isn’t proof that women had it worse. It could be, but assessing these things at a global and historical scale is complicated, and feminism makes a confirmation bias analysis taking into account only the issues that af…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:07 AM
6

If it was switched around and men had the babies and abortion would be legal but the empathy gap would remain the same I assure you women wouldn’t have been forced to become mothers and financially support a kid they didn’t decided to have. Nowadays childs as young as 12 are forced to pay child support to the women that raped them. Society didn’t cared and continues to not care. Perhaps if men’s reproductive rights would have been socially supported a legislation that granted reproductive rights…
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:46 PM
1

Because the bast majority of the people that oppose our rights don’t believe they are opposing our rights.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 01:44 PM
16

I don’t know about feminists but there might by some truth about it because in both sociology and psychology in the 70s-80s there were 2 liberals per anybody that wasn’t liberal, in the 90s 3 to 1, and now (around 5 years ago) the surveys say it’s about 20 to 1. Then again being liberal in the past probably meant something quite different than now. There is an hypothesis (ironically in social psychology) that’s called minimum group theory (or minimal group paradigm) that could explain this chang…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:30 PM
1

Regarding insurance, if an insurance company makes the product, why not? If you ask for the health insurance of minors cover them during pregnancy, those companies will rise prices and if you want to pay them, why not? In case abortion isn’t legal child support should only occur after it’s proved he is indeed the father (although covering half of prior expenses up to that point, including expenses related with the pregnancy). In case abortion is legal, the man should also have reproductive right…
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:42 PM
6

This is the most complete study I have found. Use direct data from 20 million job holders: http://info.haygroupupdate.com/rs/494-VUC-482/images/KFHG_Gender%20Pay%20Gap_Technical%20Report.pdf After accounting for other factors they find that the average pay gap difference is 1.6% in favor of men. In 5 out of 33 countries the gap is in favor of women.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 11:57 AM
6

Can you imagine if he would dare to rant about how people focus on the wrong thing because they don’t talk about how is it that the list is necessary.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:32 PM
2

I don’t remember reading about something that specific.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 01:07 PM
12

There are studies about this in STEM. Women are much more wanted in those fields because companies want to have good “equality” numbers.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:58 PM
2

Good luck. 🍀👍
/r/MensRights10/07/22 07:29 PM
9

People that are feminists don’t know how feminism is supremacist at it’s very core, they either have good intentions or just like every single human being they have cognitive distortions so they can believe what’s convenient to them.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 07:29 PM
6

I am fine with them repeating fallacies, it’s easy to dismount them (although extremely time consuming). It’s tiresome and it feels that you are talking with a wall, but I think that eventually it would do some good.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 07:27 PM
1

That’s no true, first of all child support is an obligation even if the man has always wanted to be the father, second, the legislation in USA don’t prevent that any person lives from the child support they get from having the custody of the child/s, I have seen people confess it to the judge, people that don’t want to work and live from the money that was supposed to be for their children. No judge can do anything. And also, women don’t have to pay a monthly fee for a couple decades, they can a…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:21 PM
1

“Dubay's claim that a man's right to disclaim fatherhood would be analogous to a woman's right to abortion rests upon a false analogy. In the case of a father seeking to opt out of fatherhood and thereby avoid child support obligations, the child is already in existence and the state therefore has an important interest in providing for his or her support.[8]” https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dubay_v._Wells Women had Roe v Wade, but men didn’t had Dubay v Wells.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:29 PM
17

First you congratulate me for reading it. Then I point to the obvious parts you didn’t read because those parts directly contradict your statements, and now you ask me to read it? lol and to go through the sources you claimed didn’t existed? LOL I would read it a third time after you manage to read and understand it for the first time.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:36 PM
11

If you indeed would have read the study you wouldn’t claim that there aren’t several studies finding reduced sensitivity on average. Also, to say that there is no study that shows reduced sensitivity in a majority of participants is absurd, mainly because although I am not going to dive into the literature to find it, that’s not how these things work, it’s enough for a significant part of the participants to experience a clear loss in sensitivity to claim that, on average, it reduces sensitivity…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:32 PM
18

You are making claims based on a study that a: don’t say that, and b: is garbage and it acknowledge several times the limitations of it.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:26 PM
17

Man, you clearly didn’t read the study you linked. You are claiming things this study don’t say, nor imply in any way shape or form, in fact this very study states that their findings differ from the available literature. “The results shown in our study are not quite concurrent with previous prospective studies. Waldinger et al. did not find any significant difference in the median IELT between circumcised and non-circumcised men in five countries, excluding Turkey [13]. Some researchers advocat…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:14 PM
20

In the study you linked you can find links to just a few of the studies that found decrease sensitivity. “Although the effects of circumcision are still a subject of considerable debate among advocates and opponents, several studies have investigated the effects of circumcision on sexual satisfaction. Some researchers believe that circumcision can reduce sexual satisfaction. The study conducted by Kim and Pang revealed that, after adult circumcision, there was a decrease in masturbatory pleasure…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 02:03 PM
42

That study mentions that the supposed benefits in the literature are associated with less STDs, hygiene, and infections. All these things can be prevented by good hygiene and not having sex with STDs. It’s like saying that amputating a finger prevents the risk of having problems on the nail. Regarding the study, the supposed benefits on sexual drive and erection confidence where found between people with phimosis and bad hygiene. The right comparison would be with healthy individuals. Not to men…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:40 PM
5

What reproductive rights men have that women don’t have, right now, in any state of the US? I think men and women both should have reproductive rights, but I don’t know of any place where men can opt out becoming fathers once there is an embryo. It would be as easy as allowing men to sign a document within 4 weeks after they have been notified their partner is pregnant or she gave birth. Women can notify men and then abort if they so chose, or wait for his decision if the money is a factor and t…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:41 AM
2

In case you are interested, this is my opinion. Reading it as an exercise on being open minded would be greatly appreciated. I assume that if you want to have this conversation you are going to spend the time understanding a different perspective than the one you have been receiving since your most tender childhood, so this isn’t going to be short: The whole ideology is based on the interests of a single group. Feminism never cared about forced conscription, at best, when faced with the issue, i…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 09:22 PM
17

The problem is portraying a whole group based on the worst than a little minority out of that group has done. In my country for example immigrants commit crimes at 4,5 the rate than nationals, and this statistic is used by some political parties to generalize about immigrants, but the reality is that the amount of immigrants that commit crimes is very very low, well below 1%, and yet they are all portrayed as criminals. In my country there is a law that states that men should recibe twice longer…
/r/MensRights30/06/22 01:52 PM
3

Here is the thing. You are informed your partner is pregnant, you make your choice, then she makes hers, if she decides to have it it was her choice. She makes a decision that is perfectly informed. In this scenario, no, I wouldn’t have a problem.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 08:08 AM
3

If their definition of flirting is to pay money and their definition of get hit on is to receive money these people conflate romantic relationships with prostitution. Sad cringe.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:37 PM
4

Women have those same options plus other reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 06:28 PM
6

Not to generalize, but there are studies about this, and the average is clear.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 04:04 PM
11

Thank you, very good message. I would also like to say that is ok if you don’t cry, nothing wrong with you either.
/r/MensRights02/03/22 12:45 PM
23

I heavily disagree, everyone should be able to do what they want, what’s wrong is telling people that if they chose to stay at home there is something wrong with them. This isn’t about encouraging people to do something wether or not they agree, it’s about defending people so they aren’t told what they have to do.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 11:44 AM
8

Hope you find new meaning in life. A lot of things can change in a few years, please try don’t losing hope.
/r/MensRights18/05/21 04:59 AM
152

This is a great idea, at the very least they should be clear they don’t mean “everyone” when they say “everyone”.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 09:14 PM
87

Incredible. But I suppose for most of society they truly believe that being male means being privileged and therefore any discrimination is impossible. Eventually history will put this people in their place, but by that time these generations that are alive today will probably be dead.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 09:13 PM
6

This is the most comprehensive study that has been done regarding this issue: http://info.haygroupupdate.com/rs/494-VUC-482/images/KFHG_Gender%20Pay%20Gap_Technical%20Report.pdf It compares not at a general level, but first equalizing by the same market, the same company, the same department, the same position and the same responsibilities. It gives a -1.6% difference. This is the amount that the study don’t find a good reason that explains it, which doesn’t mean there aren’t. Notice how there a…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:23 AM
9

Are you arguing that asking questions is bad and should be addressed while equating that to actually doing worse in education and getting downgraded? Seems caring more for the people that have it better to the point helping people that need the help (by answering their questions) is seen as discriminatory to the people that have it better. Are we changing the old saying of “don’t be afraid of asking questions” to actually arguing for imposing quotas on questions so other students are not bothere…
/r/MensRights21/01/21 12:09 PM
16

This is absurd and harmful to everything MRA stand for.
/r/MensRights21/01/21 12:07 PM
5

Worldwide men’s exclusive or quasi-exclusive diseases get less than half the funding than women’s exclusive or quasi exclusive diseases, e.g.: We invest over 3 times the resources researching breast cancer than prostate cancer, despite more men dying from prostate cancer than women from breast cancer. Conscription is still mandatory in some countries only for men, in the USA males need further conditions to be able to vote than women (basically had to agree to be ready to fight for their country…
/r/MensRights05/01/21 02:11 PM
45

The worst part is they truly believe that men are dispensable, this is an obvious supremacist believe.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 01:54 PM
2

How was this received?
/r/MensRights28/10/20 07:57 AM
4

There are transgenders that after the transition they feel better, there are ones that feel worse, their personal take about which gender have it worse will be colored by the deep emotional impact that their transition had on them, not to mention who has it worse should be irrelevant to anyone that cares about equality under the law and equality of opportunities. The whole systemic whatever is just an excuse to justify policies based on group identity rather than individual rights and freedoms.
/r/MensRights28/10/20 07:50 AM
2

Basically you have just explained the “reductio ad hitlerum” fallacy. Hitler also drunk water, is water evil? of course not, but propaganda is usually based on very simple manechaeist group identity cores, if someone not considered a part of your group says something, that idea should be understood as evil and wrong and your position contrarian to it by default. Automatically people engage in cognitive distortion so they don’t have to suffer cognitive dissonance. Not one of us, then wrong and ev…
/r/MensRights25/06/20 07:40 AM
3

The first vicepresident, Carmen Calvo, the prior Ministry of “Equality” (I know, very Orwellian”), said that all citizens that were doubting to go to he demonstrations should go because going was “a life or death situation” (“les va la vida en ello”). Other members of the government said that “machist violence kills more than coronavirus” (because in the last 17 years there has been 1000 women killed by partners or expartners). The government fired the doctor responsible for risk preventions of …
/r/MensRights01/04/20 04:20 PM
3

https://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/releases/bne-bne0000199.pdf Also here you can find an article mentioning that infant and toddler boys need more care and interaction than girls, which makes the problem even worse: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/moral-landscapes/201701/be-worried-about-boys-especially-baby-boys You can find the link to the second study in the following link, it is more of a meta study in gender bias peer review studies: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble-rou…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 11:26 AM
2

That’s good, English isn’t my mother tongue and it was half a joke half a question about the meaning. Didn’t meant anything by it.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:18 PM
3

Or sis. Lol, I am falling for this inclusive language, can’t we assume everything is neutral and move on?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 09:03 PM
6

Absolutely. They also mention that this could also mean that women have learned to cope with pain better, because they report it more. One could say the opposite hypothesis is true, that grow used to pain make you report it less, which is the argument they bring when talking about evolutionary psychology later on in the article. “It could also be that women have learned to cope with pain and are more accustomed to talking about it. After all, don't women experience more pain in their lives? What…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:54 PM
2

The laws for divorce, alimony, child support, etc... come from the Victorian era or right afterwards and the objective was to protect women economically because they were not supposed to work, if the husband or ex-husband could afford it. Also to protect women that had children outside of matrimony. The thing is that women have been able to study and go into the job market for many decades now, and those laws are still in place because well, misandry or gynocentrism or male disposability or all …
/r/MensRights21/07/19 02:13 PM
7

There are people, and sometimes this happens to me, that just point out to a slight imprecision whenever they see it, not thinking about if it is going to be interpreted based on some... I don’t know... political context, or rape apologist context or whatever. It’s just an imprecision and they point it out. There is a non insignificant number of people that tend to do this, and that is without taking into account the people, like me, that were unaware that there were apologists of that kind of r…
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:48 PM
7

I don’t think they they are trying to say that is not that bad, just that there is a different name for that. This is how it was explained to me at school when talking about ancient Greeks, like literally they explained the difference in the meaning of those two words in class.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:36 PM
3

I would also be against social ramifications. In the past we used that to change behavior (Middle Ages), but it was an event, like people gathered they trough some pieces of rotten food or crap at the subject and that was it. Nowadays there is no end of the event in the internet era, because there is no sign that the event is finished and as long as there is one person that want to reignite it it could be restarted, become meme even. It would haunt the subject all her/his life, professionally ev…
/r/MensRights14/07/19 09:46 AM
1

I understand your point and I agree with it. I am asking for the details of the requirements for “ATP Player Member and “ATP Registered Player” so I can have some evidence I may be asked.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 06:36 PM
1

I don’t understand why you say that you can’t have mixed women and men football if one team is just men. Of course you can, teams should be free to chose which player is the best for each position regardless of sex. I understand that you were just making a critique to a certain argument, I didn’t contested your position, I was merely opening the discussion.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:07 PM
1

Why don’t agree on equality of opportunities? Men and women and transgenders can all play in the same competition/tour. We impose equality of outcome (between males and females regarding sport results) due to biological advantages. This benefits women greatly from a financial point of view, even before the so called “equal pay” in tennis.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:45 PM
1

If you have a link to the ATP allowing female players send it to me please. I don't see any rule in the ATP Rulebook saying that only men are allowed, it says that to play the circuit you need to be "an ATP Player Member (”Member”) or an ATP Registered Player" (idk if you need to be man to get either of these), but it also states "Wild cards are exempt from this provision". So in theory if a tournament gives a wildcard to a woman she could play, doesn't she?.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:41 PM
2

I agree with you in terms of the misperception that this is uncommon, but using single examples isn’t going to challenge that view, in fact it’s way more probable that this would be used as an example of other misperception that sees MensRights as a place full of misogyny because those misperceptions are often held together by the same persons. I also get your point, a video has advantages, it’s a more attractive content for people than statistics, which are very dry. Just to clarify, I am not s…
/r/MensRights06/07/19 01:18 PM
8

As fair as it is to complain about double standards I don’t think this is the right content for this sub. Making our most upvoted posts individual cases, makes us look as if we are engaging in anecdotal evidence at best, and in some cases it is easily to take it out of context and suggest that we are promoting violence against women, because they aren’t going to take into account self-defense.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 08:52 AM
2

I agree that one paper isn’t enough, but most of the criticism is in the meaning of the face for newborns, and if the preference is top-heavy or social. Even if this would be the case, imo, the difference of results would indicate the conclusion that there is, in fact, biological differences, on average, between males and females in terms of interests or tastes. To suggest that just because females and males looked approximately the same time to faces that we couldn’t conclude that there is sexu…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 01:51 PM
4

I agree with this depending how it is written because there is an important caveat here. I will also add an amendment stating that the government won’t pass any laws based on interpretations of the culture (“systemic oppression” or any other concept based on social constructionism) at that moment, so no descriptive position of it could argue the necessity of “positive” discrimination. Or an amendment stating that the state guarantees that the objective is equality of opportunity in every case , …
/r/MensRights03/07/19 09:17 AM
2

Good job!
/r/MensRights27/06/19 10:30 AM
3

Imo, this is the kind of content we should upvote to the top.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 08:27 AM
1

I find confusing that despite the obvious proof of relevant figures within feminist promoting ideas that play with mass murder you don’t accept the fact that this ideas exist within feminism. I believe that faced with those claims you make a false differentiation between individual actual acts and the nonexistent comments after the fact with no support for those ideas. Imo, there is a disconnect between what regular people that call themselves feminists believe (equality between the males and fe…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:03 AM
1

They don’t mention any bad PR unless they feel they have to, and then again they just justify it, that’s why these kind of hate speech within feminism continues, because it’s never condemned by other feminists.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:09 AM
1

There is a disconnect in communication here. You state the same justifications for hate speech despite having received examples that proof your statement about feminism don’t toying with genocidal ideas ever to be wrong, and yet you keep stating the same. The scum manifest is still studied in gender studies and we all know what it states. You don’t need to go the any obscure superhardcore anything. The fact you are more preoccupied defending feminism PR than to condemn hate speech and calls to m…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 09:05 AM
1

So your argument is that because there are no statistics attributing murders to motivations said crimes don’t exist and therefore is just hysterical nonsense. Even if there were no crimes of the sort, would that mean that the crimes would have to exist before the speech asking for killing men, for people to condemn said hate speech? Because that’s what you seem to be suggesting and in my opinion I don’t even need to explain why that idea is absurd. I have noticed you didn’t answer my answer to a…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:42 AM
1

Unfortunately your source is based mostly on the meaning of macho in South America and not the meaning of macho in Spain, which translation is male, so your authority argument (a logical fallacy), based on a sort of democratic approach that includes selection bias, does not take into account the sociocultural aspects in which said hate speech was used. Not to mention that the best defense that you are able to come up with is that it doesn’t mean death to all men, but death to just some men. Rega…
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:27 PM
3

If you want examples of feminists arguing for killing males without any kind of backlash from other feminists here you have a “few”: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9v6tqj/a_list_about_feminism_misandry_for_anyone_who/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
/r/MensRights22/06/19 10:58 AM
1

With all due respect, please find what Karen Straughan has to say about this: (please notice she is addressing a person saying he is not that kind of feminist while you are saying that there are feminists that are not like that, both things are obviously true but the answer is valid anyway) So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching …
/r/MensRights22/06/19 09:22 AM
5

Meanwhile, in a feminist demonstration also in Spain: https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/aystta/muerte_al_macho_sign_on_international_womens_day/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:48 AM
5

As simplistic and ridiculous as it sounds I think you are spot on. Group identity is part of Milieu Control and therefore part of ideologies and because of that nobody is allowed to go against and keep having any kind of moral authority.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 12:30 PM
7

https://becauseits2015.wordpress.com/2017/07/16/trickle-down-equality-and-framing-mens-issues-as-really-being-about-women/
/r/MensRights20/04/19 06:32 PM
1

In any other case she will have been sentenced to two years and, because is a first offense and the sentence is 2 years or less, she wouldn’t have had to go to jail. The sentence for helping other person to commit suicide is 2 to 10 years, but because there are extenuating circumstances (she was suffering for esclerosis) the sentence will be the bare minimum. But because it’s him who helped her and not the other way around, and because the Supreme Court ruled that no matter the circumstances any…
/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:49 PM
1

Gender violence
/r/MensRights11/04/19 03:34 PM
3

I am glad you had never been raped when you were a kid. I am upset you don’t have enough empathy to understand, without having experienced that horror, that abusive relationships generates psychological dependency and all short of trauma.
/r/MensRights27/03/19 10:17 AM
1

I criticize you using generalizations, if that is your definition of white knight then you have a very different definition than me. If you fall for group identity then you are part of the problem.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 05:38 AM
2

Stop with the generalizations please, it’s embarrassing seeing this kind of absurdity in here.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 06:04 PM
1

It’s not necessary for women to abort or give the child into adoption for men having the right to chose if they are going to be fathers.
/r/MensRights14/03/19 08:39 AM
2

What about a document that would allow the man to chose if he wants to be father or not? Would that be reproductive rights?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 11:57 AM
8

I found the post interesting, your comment was a waste of time though.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 11:51 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:45 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:45 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:44 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:43 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:43 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:42 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:42 AM
1

https://www.cnnchile.com/mundo/muerte-al-macho-no-es-solo-una-metafora-organizacion-feminista-convoca-marcha-a-favor-de-nahir-galarza_20180709/
/r/MensRights10/03/19 10:42 AM
2

Wow, you come off really condescending with those two last comments. What pushed you to try to offend a person that just asked for your advice?
/r/MensRights09/03/19 11:41 PM
4

That’s right, and if you look at many comments there you will find many people were trying to find excuses to justify it, pretending it was an allegory that the meaning was obvious and such.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:11 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:09 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:08 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:08 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:08 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:07 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:07 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:07 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:06 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:06 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:05 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:05 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:05 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:05 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ayv5wq/when_you_have_a_doubt_become_the_widow_spain2019/
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:04 PM
0

You didn’t understood my comment.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 01:01 PM
1

There are three things I find wrong your post, first, you pretend to care about men’s rights but when entering a post about “muerte al macho” not only you make outrageous excuses to justify it, but belittle the people that find it offensive. It’s like saying, I care about your concerns but don’t talk about them, in fact I am going to go ahead and belittle your feelings. I truly hope you haven’t tell anyone that males should express their feelings more because when we do you belittle and mock us.…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 12:35 PM
1

More insults, I suppose that’s the level of the conversation, resorting to insults and when logical fallacies are called out, confronted with the impotency of being wrong but unable to accept it because of the cognitive dissonance, resort to more insults. If you are not willing to be convinced by logic, reason and facts go ahead and say the last word, it would feel good for your ego, you can keep believing whatever you want. It’s clearly a matter of faith to you, because if someone would have sa…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 10:15 AM
1

Again, you keep talking about Latin countries, as if something that happened in Spain has to be interpreted in the context of other countries. The video is illuminating because they use the word “machito” referring to persons, as they have legs and arms that apparently they need to chop off. But I have already given you the definition, different examples, and also swapping the phrase with other words and all that supports the so evident meaning of the phrase. And to all that only thing you have …
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:55 AM
1

Context. Sometimes also known as psychological compartmentalization. What is the context of someone writing “Muerte al pobre”? Si se quería decir “acabemos con el machismo” why did it clearly says “Muerte al macho”? Maybe “muerte al pobre” means “acabemos con la pobreza”? Of course not.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:50 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must be chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 09:10 AM
1

That’s not the question at all, how can you say that the question is if I agree with me identifying to a definition which meaning has nothing to do with the meaning that the phrase and the word has at the place where it was used? The questions here is the meaning of the phrase and do you agree with it? The meaning it’s clear, death to males, that’s the translation from Spanish (of Spain) to English. And the answer to the second question only you can give because I obviously disagree, it’s you wh…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 08:46 AM
2

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must be chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:41 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must be chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:38 AM
0

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must be chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:37 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must be chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:37 AM
0

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must be chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:36 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:35 AM
1

Which only shows the extend of your bias. So a call to kill and your reaction is “well, it’s not that they are asking to kill all men just a bunch of them, why? Because I use a different definition of the word that doesn’t exist” https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it see…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:34 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:32 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:32 AM
0

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:32 AM
2

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:31 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:31 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must’ve chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:28 AM
1

You, again, keep talking without knowing what you are talking about. It’s obvious you get your information from a biased source. Spanish law differentiates between the different grades of any sexual misconduct (like most countries), none of those different kinds of sexual misconduct are called rape (violación in Spanish), but the sentences are similar to most occidental countries, just a different name. It also work with “agravantes” (ingravescents), which use the circumstances to add severity t…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 07:21 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convoluted excuses. I wonder w…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:18 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI Ad hominem attacks don’t work.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:17 AM
1

By that absurd logic if someone say “muerte a la mujer” or “muerte al negro” they are just referring to a single undetermined woman or black, which isn’t true, those frases would mean death to women and death to blacks, and you know it. “Muerte al macho” is perfectly well written in Spanish, it’s a case of using the singular as a generic. Claro, y “Muerte al pobre” significa acabar con la pobreza. Repugnante manipulación.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:08 AM
1

https://youtu.be/2_B4lUEKGbI More calls to kill men in the presentation of a documental about battered men. Apparently that abstract concept has legs and arms that must be chopped off. Let’s not forget the chanting “Machito, pardillo, tu boca en el bordillo” , so it seems that supposedly abstract concept also has a mouth that can be used to kill him American X style. It’s simply staggering seeing how people see a call to kill a group of people and they start justifying it with all sorts of convo…
/r/MensRights09/03/19 06:00 AM
1

Y si alguien dice muerte a la mujer o muerte al negro entonces, siguiendo tu lógica absurda y tu completa ignorancia del lenguaje, significaría que se desea la muerte a una mujer indeterminada o a alguien indeterminado que resulta que tiene la piel oscura. Claro claro, y “that sentence does not make sense in Spanish”, venga ya, no sabes de lo que hablas y rellenas los huecos con lo que te gustaría que fuera la realidad en vez de con los hechos, aunque no puedan ser más claros.
/r/MensRights09/03/19 05:58 AM
3

How is it misleading? I am Spaniard, I know what it means. Death to males. Shame on you for mocking people and justifying hate speech.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:16 PM
2

Oh please, you just said you are from Mexico not Spain, and now you are lecturing us of the “underlying problems in Spain”? They asked you specific questions and your answers were about different stuff rather than about the question. It’s clear you believe rather than know, not worth trying to communicate with you.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:14 PM
1

I am Spaniard, macho means male, this was written in Spain. Stop trying to justify something like this, it’s disgusting.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:10 PM
1

This is a lie and you know it: https://dle.rae.es/?id=NndQJAy|Nnghkls
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:04 PM
1

This is another lie. The exact translation is death to males. Spaniard here. https://dle.rae.es/?id=NndQJAy|Nnghkls
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:03 PM
1

You are lying and you know it, it literally says death to males. If it wanted to say “muerte al machismo” it would have said “muerte al machismo” instead of “muerte al macho” which is “death to males”. it’s disgusting how people try to justify this.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:02 PM
3

Not at all, Spaniard here.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:00 PM
2

Macho means male. The exact translation is death to males.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 10:00 PM
1

I am Spaniard, the exact definition is death to males. It is meant to mean men, that’s the only meaning of the phrase. People are looking for excuses to justify it, it’s disgusting.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:59 PM
2

You are making this up and you know it. Macho has never had that meaning. The translation of macho is male. I am Spaniard and this is my country but if you want just take a look at the definition with all the different posible meanings: https://dle.rae.es/?id=NndQJAy|Nnghkls
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:56 PM
1

Death to males, that’s the translation, you forgot to translate one word.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:54 PM
-1

I am Spaniard. Death to males is a precise translation.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:53 PM
-1

No, it means death to males.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:52 PM
-4

Wow, where to start... Macho in Spain means male, nothing more nothing less. You either don’t know what you are talking about or you are straight out lying. It doesn’t mean misogynist. I don’t even know how we are even discussing this. I am Spaniard, this is my country and my mother tongue we are talking about. Spain has one of the lowest “femicides” (I don’t know if that’s a word, English isn’t my mother tongue) in Europe and in the world. Spain has very low criminality and child abuse is prima…
/r/MensRights08/03/19 09:52 PM
2

I am Spaniard and either you talk about what you know nothing about or you are trying to mislead the readers on purpose. Masculine is masculino, macho is male.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:15 PM
1

Macho means male in Spanish. I am Spaniard. There is absolutely nothing here that indicates anything related with culture. The phrase is cristal clear, death to males.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:13 PM
7

Macho means male in Spanish. I am Spaniard. The “culture” bit you introduced is completely absurd and arbitrary.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:09 PM
13

Didn’t you heard the news? Everybody here (the media), is saying that is the typical reactionary move due to the insecurities of fragile masculinity being threatened by “equality”. It is supposed to pass, as a fase, and then we all will get along with the program. My country is crazy, all the media is crazy, politicians have gone nuts.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:07 PM
6

Macho means male. I am Spaniard.
/r/MensRights08/03/19 08:03 PM
1

:) I don’t see any difference between what you are saying and what I tried to mean (English isn’t my mother tongue). In fact there is a lot of literature about unconscious bias of all kinds, we all have them at many different levels. I am glad you liked my comment although I suppose if we both would have been offended by each other’s opinion or at least disagree then we might have taken more from that. Is that irrational? ;)
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:47 PM
1

I have to apologize, I got a little carried away. :(
/r/MensRights05/03/19 02:22 PM
1

There is another important factor, feminism has always denied the existence or disregarded men’s issues, making them as problems generated by men (so men problems are men’s fault and women’s problems too), or directly opposing fixing those problems as they did with the proposal of having shared custody as the default, or the proposal of being able to opt out of fatherhood (procreation rights) within the first weeks of pregnancy while abortion is still an option, or with the proposal of ending wi…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:54 PM
1

Huge huge HUGE wall of text. Feminism is an ideology based on postmodernity, group identity and social constructionism. The postmodernity aspect makes communication almost imposible because it defends that shared truth can’t be achieved, it’s only about subjective perceived truth that turns into a narrative. Social constructionism serve as rationalization to sustain the ideas of “systemic oppression”, privilege, and gender. These ideas together with group identity sets the fundamentals of extrem…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 01:42 PM
2

Well, what we already knew: 1.- men are discriminated by the justice system 2.- some women are demons and some women are angels, just like men.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 12:55 PM
1

If abortion is based on the premise of a woman having the right to chose what to do with her body wouldn’t that argument imply that prostitution and subrogante pregnancy should be legal? Specially taking into account that in regards to abortion the ownership of that tissue (part of the female’s body or being the baby’s body) is more contested than in the other cases. Based on the same premise, wouldn’t this also imply that men should have the right to renounce becoming fathers while the woman is…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 07:47 AM
1

Exactly, I am socially liberal and homosexual, I am strongly consider voting for them just to send a message. Unfortunately the left was taken over by feminism and feminism was taken over by group identity and tribalism long before. VOX is the party that has the most progressive proposal regarding domestic violence in Spain, and that’s the left problem, that has given up that space and alienated many people like me with their prejudices and generalizations and discrimination of men.
/r/MensRights04/03/19 07:36 AM
0

More like representing feminism. In any case, it’s ironic that after JP critiques group identity and equality of outcome she makes the argument of representative democracy, as if in democracy the ideas of the citizens can only be represented by persons with the same skin color or sex or sexuality etc... The idea of identity implies the idea of difference with an other or others. If you believe in group identity the differences between groups aren’t superficial and irrelevant, they are actually c…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:08 PM
2

All right, I have never done this but I feel the need to do it so damn it, let’s do this! ... username checks out.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 10:50 AM
3

I myself have mentioned that imo feminism have turned in Milieu Control, although this is typical of ideologies. Take for example key concepts in feminism: Trigger warnings foster the idea that a difference of opinion is likely offensive Safe places implies that in order to be protected you need to not be subjected to the possibility of a difference of opinion. It also foster the idea that communication isn’t really posible, because a difference of opinion can’t be discussed unemotionally, there…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 10:21 AM
5

Huge wall of text. Well, for starters social constructionism, in it’s hard version, states that any difference of tastes, interest and ultimately average behavior, is 100% culturally determined. In regards with gender there are many many studies that debunk that idea of gender as exclusively culturally determined, what was called “gender roles”. For example, there are a type of studies in which you let children choose between different toys, boys tend to chose objects (cars and so) and girls ten…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:48 AM
1

English isn’t my mother tong but look here: https://www.badgerandblade.com/forum/ “feather” blades are specially good for curse/thick hair, as they are probably the sharpest. It seems people in that forum agree with me: https://www.badgerandblade.com/forum/threads/best-blades-for-coarse-thick-hair.238074/
/r/MensRights21/01/19 09:34 PM
4

Gillette razors are crap. There are many many options better than them and usually cheaper. They only had the name recognition due to so many adds through the years and the traditional distribution channels, the importance of the later has been decreasing and now don’t have the former.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 08:22 PM
9

Attacking men = women? I don’t think so therefore your question is a captions question based on a negative premise of women, you don’t need to lack any empathy for men in order to be a woman, you don’t need to make terrible generalizations about men based on the worst of what a minority of them do in order to be a woman, you don’t need to redefine masculinity in accordance with your interests in order to be a woman (you wouldn’t approve of it if it was the other way around). This is what happens…
/r/MensRights15/01/19 06:24 PM
2

¿su amigo?, si está individua fue una amiga de la víctima ¿qué hace a la gente que no le cae bien?
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:47 AM
2

Yeah well, can you really say that in a country that have a law for 14 years now that gives men no presumption of innocence? I mean, every single feminist in Spain consider this is perfectly reasonable and a step forward for someday achieving equality... sooo.... it should just say feminism, at least the way feminism is represented by their behavior right now. The people that defend this and is advocating for including sexual misconduct of any kind inside the law that discriminates men are not c…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:36 PM
3

I think there is a disconnect now between the reality of the amount of people that believe in identity politics (still very significant) and the meta narrative that feminism became both in terms of every single media outlet (no mater which media outlet politically leaning speaking) and the political parties that defend to continue increasing the inequality under the law approach (every one of them except a new party, called VOX, which is conservative-nationalist-liberals) VOX is the only party t…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:11 PM
2

So we have passed from gay conservatives to “fuck you, I got mine”. I am gay and antifeminist. Would they say I am a person that is defined by “fuck you, I got mine”? Truth is being gay should have the same impact than liking coffee instead of tea, what I don’t get is why having different ideas is not, and instead we are characterized with “fuck you, I got mine”. Even more, according with that statement, not defining yourself by such words would be not being honest. Way to generalize about peopl…
/r/MensRights01/01/19 12:00 PM
9

In the words of Karen Straughan: “I n every state in the US, women can legally abandon their newborns at designated "safe haven" sites and permanently (and anonymously) walk away from all responsibility for the child. That is, even after a woman has unilaterally decided to bring a pregnancy to term, she can then unilaterally decide to opt out of motherhood. In the de jure sense, these laws are equally accessible to men. In the de facto sense, however, no man can exercise the same unilateral righ…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:25 PM
3

Problem is feminism as an ideology that try for everyone to see themselves just as members of different groups in permanent conflict.
/r/MensRights28/12/18 12:19 PM
2

Don’t worry, be happy.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 03:48 PM
1

“it is Christmas so I'll go with an ad hom.” LOL
/r/MensRights26/12/18 09:13 PM
1

Imo, either you didn’t understand my comment or you don’t have an answer for it.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:43 PM
9

I don’t see in your comment any statistics regarding the number of hours that fathers and mothers spend with their kids. I also don’t see any logic that sustain that these so called “hours of opportunity” translate in a DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL correlation with the number of murders. As we know there are mothers that kill their new born infants immediately as there are parents (an overwhelming majority) that don’t kill their kids ever, seems to me that the directly proportional correlation is not s…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 07:41 AM
18

I am homosexual and I am going with nowhere except maybe his house. Being a drag queen isn’t an identity, if he wants to perform he can wait and practice at home. We don’t let 10 year old girls to perform at adult clubs, from my point of view this look pretty straightforward. “ My responsibility as a citizen is to ensure that kid isn’t harmed, and if he is, it’s not obvious enough to warrant my protection or yours.” That kid is being harmed. That place is no place for a kid. We put age restricti…
/r/MensRights16/12/18 05:41 PM
8

I think we are basically in agreement. One of the basics rules of logic is that the one making the claim is the one that has to back said claim. I am not defending any specific number, I am answering to the statement that feminism has been making for a long time, which is minimizing the prevalence of false accusations. They defended the idea of 2% for a long time, in Spain they defend that false accusations for domestic violence are below 0,01%. If you managed to access the web I was trying to l…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:57 PM
12

A selection of findings on the prevalence of false rape allegations. Data from Rumney (2006). Number False reporting rate (%) Theilade and Thomsen (1986) 1 out of 56 4 out of 39 1.5% (minimum) 10% (maximum) New York Rape Squad (1974) n/a 2% Hursch and Selkin (1974) 10 out of 545 2% Kelly et al. (2005) 67 out of 2,643 3% ("possible" and "probable" false allegations) 22% (recorded by police as "no-crime") Geis (1978) n/a 3–31% (estimates given by police surgeons) Smith (1989) 17 out of 447 3.8% U.…
/r/MensRights06/12/18 08:31 PM
3

Without links to studies I can’t mention this in any conversation.
/r/MensRights01/12/18 01:03 PM
2

The statement that OP made is misleading. Spanish law differentiates between the different grades of any sexual misconduct (like most countries), none of those different kinds of sexual misconduct are called rape (violación in Spanish), but the sentences are similar to most occidental countries, just a different name. It also work with “agravantes” (ingravescents), which use the circumstances to add severity to the sentence. For example, if the sexual misconduct is with a minor, independently of…
/r/MensRights24/11/18 07:06 PM
40

That’s not true, they were doing something, they were laughing at him being assaulted.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/11/18 06:27 PM
9

Not to mention that 34% of the guilty verdicts in cases of domestic violence only have her word as “proof”. If she don’t retire the accusation, don’t change her story and her story is plausible, because her word has presumption of truthfulness (and therefore you have presumption of guilty) you will make time. Often she will retire the accusation because she would already got what she wanted, she will still keep the status of victim of gender violence after retiring the accusation, get the monthl…
/r/MensRights21/11/18 11:40 PM
2

His behavior!? His?! I am shocked by your insistence in finding excuses for the behavior of that cruel bully. It’s because of double standards like this why we don’t have equality of responsibility in our societies.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:02 PM
3

I think we have a winner.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 11:29 AM
8

I have always liked the guy. The metoo witch-hunt is making me take it at a personal level. I just not understand how can it be so easy to destroy a man’s reputation with no actual evidence whatsoever.
/r/MensRights29/10/18 12:15 PM
1

No need to throw insults. Regarding patriotism it would have to be defined in a way that don´t enter in conflict with “teamwork and cooperation” or the principles of the enlightenment, and usually isn´t defined that way (neither nationalism). We could enter a deep discussion about the meaning of the word “country” and it´s relationship with culture, and therefore how patriotism would have to be defined to not considering other people in other countries “less of a priority” or how loving your cou…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:06 PM
1

The “patriotism”, “rational patriarchy” and the “father knows best” are not for me. The rest more or less I could agree, although the “pro-family” and “boys will be boys” are too broad and subject to interpretation, they would have to be precisely and carefully defined in order for me to agree. The same could be said on the other side, I probably could only agree with a very carefully defined version of globalism that have nothing to do with multiculturalism and cultural amorality. I think tryin…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 05:16 PM
3

I believed clothes may have something to do with it, as well the expectation of using a towel after it’s finished or as it has been mentioned the temperature of the water or the fact that not everybody runs from the rain.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 01:32 PM
2

There are some things in my prior comment that points to their misandry. If you mean the reason why they are, I suppose there must be some complicated psychological explanation just as there were people being racist to themselves. Menslib consider itself part of feminism, therefore they don’t criticize feminism even when feminist associations have fought against joint custody agreements as default, against reproductive rights for men (without touching the ones for women), against discrimination …
/r/MensRights24/10/18 09:49 AM
3

In my country (Spain) men don’t have presumption of innocence in cases of domestic violence. Just the accusation of a woman is enough to be sentenced guilty if she doesn’t change her story and say story is not obviously false. Judges have to believe the accuser if the accuser is a woman. The sentences are longer too, is considered a hate crime. Menslib is sexist, the same way there have always been people that were/are racist against themselves. Menslib is the result of the gynocentrism in our s…
/r/MensRights24/10/18 07:08 AM
5

I liked how was portrayed but I have a complain. There is a moment when the rookie explains that he suspected but his partner says “how could you know? Don’t blame yourself.” or something like it. Well, here is the problem, they are trained to assume that it only happens in one direction. I get it though, he shouldn’t blame himself but not because it was imposible to detect (he already suspected) but because mistakes are inevitable. That don’t change the fact that if the police would receive spe…
/r/MensRights20/10/18 07:45 AM
1

“It’s a shame that Frances Hall, after suffering the loss of her husband, is now being sued by her son.” How can anyone say something as bizarre as that, that the killer suffered the loss of her husband? As if she is the victim!
/r/MensRights16/10/18 06:34 PM
2

The number of racist comments in that article is staggering, either they claim whites are rapist or they say black are rapist. Funny how all that those comments have in common is that they are both misandrist.
/r/MensRights16/10/18 06:11 AM
12

How interesting, you though you were the judge instead of the accuser or prosecutor. Makes sense considering one side defends that innocence until proven otherwise should be thrown away, why make trials when the accuser can directly dictates sentence?
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:35 PM
11

Thank you your honor. I rest my case.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:21 PM
15

The level of intellectual discussion and the quality of the arguments has to be null in order to resort to provocation through the logical fallacy of ad hominem attacks. This says a lot more about you believing that whoever don’t agree with you deserves no respect than about the people you want to feel insulted.
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:13 PM
1

I don’t know, but I assume was in US. I understand the logic behind it, businesses reacting to a culture in which the company is affected with what their employees do outside work. I just don’t like it. Also, if by law you would make it illegal because due process and such, would society still blame companies for what they can’t control? Things being how they are media (social media too) can destroy anybody’s life and if they don’t do it very clumsily they won’t face consequences for their actio…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:04 PM
1

There is a previous comment from Iamhereforthesalmon with a link. I probably should have posted the comment as a response to that information but though that I could answer the post adding the information that he was fired in the same comment that I give my opinion on what to do with these cases (let the justice work) “Noble Studio 101 posted a statement on Instagram Wednesday that “it has been brought to our attention that Jordan Hunt has been caught on camera assaulting an innocent bystander a…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:05 PM
1

I am not seeing the non-sequitur but maybe there is. Please explain it.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 02:46 PM
6

I don’t like that he has been fired. I don’t like the fact that this society is taking justice in their own hands with the justification of businesses supporting criminal behavior if they don’t fire the employee. I am all for making sure he receives a hard sentence so he learns the lesson. If businesses aren’t allowed to ask their employees anything personal how is it the media and many people make the businesses personally responsible of the actions of their employees when they are out of worki…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:03 AM
1

http://www.elmundo.es/espana/2018/08/19/5b784a46e5fdeaa3258b45c6.html In case you speak Spanish this video explains well the false accusations issue and many other stuff in the law, although the author is dressed in a weird way: https://youtu.be/4-LlooPkJ-Y The links to the sources can be found in there, I recommend you use those. But yes, we are talking about 40-80 women every year, in a population of 46 million, so maybe a little less than that, around 1.3 murders per million inhabitants (Mill…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 07:26 PM
1

I upvoted you. Whether is fair or not we have to have much higher standards than them, we are being scrutinized so any emotion can and will be used against us. We are and will continue to be judged only by the very worst of what anyone says in the sub.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 07:05 PM
1

“and I promise you those people don't think they're being hateful, but they are.” 1.-“and I promise you those people don't think they're being hateful” which implies that they don’t have the intention of being hateful, which in turn would mean they aren’t hateful according with the definition of the word. “full of hate:malicious” or as a second meaning “deserving of or arousing hate” 2.- “but they are.” Implying that the intention of the emisor isn’t relevant, only the interpretation of the rece…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 01:27 PM
1

“and I promise you those people don't think they're being hateful, but they are.” By that logic is not the intention that counts but the feelings of the person that perceive the statements. The problem with this logic is that although the one that make the statement could be biased, the one that reads it may be too. The same way that there is bigotry there is a culture of victimhood. The media influences this a lot, it’s the reason why the studies show that most women feel afraid of walking down…
/r/MensRights28/09/18 06:16 AM
2

I am against censorship. If they want to spill their hate narrative against us in that sub that’s a non issue for me. We should have other standards.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 12:53 PM
2

“On June 3, 1968, Valerie Solanas shot Warhol and art critic and curator Mario Amaya at Warhol's studio. Before the shooting, Solanas had been a marginal figure in the Factory scene. She founded a "group" called S.C.U.M. (Society for Cutting Up Men) and authored the S.C.U.M. Manifesto, a separatist feminist attack on patriarchy. Over the years, Solanas' manifesto has found a following. Solanas appears in the 1968 Warhol film I, A Man. Earlier on the day of the attack, Solanas had been turned awa…
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:52 PM
1

I receive my daily dosis of energy and positivity listening to people like you. Thank you for existing.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 02:00 PM
1

How you justify your conclusion that the reason men express their depression as anger is solely culturally constructed? Without addressing this statement we can’t proceed to value the merit of the other assumptions.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:55 PM
3

So we should run all the males cv that are going to be hired in front of all the females that are going to be hired so they give the ok to their coworkers and decide who is hired and who not? Seems to me that would have the same result as here, so that can’t be the solution. Maybe we should give them the CV and ask her if we have to choose between him or her just so we can say that she isn’t taking the decision, that would be even more convenient for her. Interesting idea of equality...
/r/MensRights11/09/18 08:14 AM
10

This is too recent, it has been released just “now”. I would like to believe that is going to be a wake up call but probably is wishful thinking. Still is a miracle that this has been made in Spain. In Spain feminism is the metanarrative, there isn’t any voice with some doubts, much less opposition, in any media outlet, whether TV, press, radio, no matter where in the political spectrum. The documentary is called silenced and I am afraid is going to continue to be the right title.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:49 PM
6

https://youtu.be/WYzrGHRPWMs Please try to not pay attention at how weird the YouTuber is dressed, it’s almost imposible. It’s explained in the video how they were accused of being guilty of promoting the murder of women, as a way to try to censor the documentary in film festivals, cinemas, etc... You can also see shocking images of some feminists trying to stop the premiere of the documentary and how they sang “ni piernas, ni brazos, ¡machitos a pedazos!” (A rough translation would be “without …
/r/MensRights08/09/18 06:17 PM
11

The documentary buys into the premise that we live in a patriarchy, which I don’t agree with at all, but the importance of it is that even when agreeing with such core part of feminism ideology the documentary and the creators are accused of being a tool for the “feminicidio” (murder of females) in Spain for daring to speak about men victims of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights08/09/18 05:52 PM
1

You are wrong, let me explain why: 1.- If you think a GPA of 4.0 is the bare minimum you must be conflating the Unweighted GPA score (the one people refer as GPA score and that has a maximum of 4.0) with weighted GPA score that some schools use and that has a maximum of 5.0. 2.- These are the average GPAs of successful candidates (the ones that became new students) at the 25 universities whose successful candidates have the highest average GPA score. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.business2com…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:53 PM
1

There are a lot of studies talking about interviews. The conclusion is that interviews are the worst possible system to assess the value of an applicant. The candidates selected though interviews show worse performance in their assigned jobs than the ones selected through any other method. It sounds comical but you almost could have a monkey shooting darts at a board with a bunch of names and expect the results would be better. And this is without counting subjective bias in the interviewer/s. T…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:09 PM
1

You obviously pick both of them. Your premise is false, not everybody has a 4.0 GPA, and if at some point this is the case and they start to receive more applicants with perfect scores than openings available then is the moment to make the tests more difficult. This is pure logic.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 01:04 PM
7

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/local/wp/2018/07/20/feature/crossing-the-divide-do-men-really-have-it-easier-these-transgender-guys-found-the-truth-was-more-complex/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c4f6118fde5c
/r/MensRights30/08/18 08:51 AM
7

According with both the CDC and the National Crime Victimization Survey men are victims of rape at a very similar rate than women. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6308a1.htm For many feminists, questioning claims of rampant sexual violence in our society amounts to misogynist “rape denial.” However, if the CDC figures are to be taken at face value, then we must also conclude that, far from being a product of patriarchal violence against women, “rape culture” is a two-way street, with…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 09:13 PM
1

Lol. I am sorry for the wall of text
/r/MensRights23/08/18 10:36 AM
2

In case you speak Spanish this is well explained although the author is dressed in a weird way: https://youtu.be/4-LlooPkJ-Y The links to the sources can be found in there But yes, we are talking about 40-80 women every year, in a population of 46 million, so maybe a little less than that, around 1.3 murders per million inhabitants (Million, not thousand). In the USA we are talking of 1,138 in 2005 and around 1.640 in 2007 (according with Wikipedia), but USA population in 2007 was around 302 mil…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:34 PM
1

In case you speak Spanish this is interesting: https://youtu.be/4-LlooPkJ-Y
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:24 AM
8

http://www.elmundo.es/espana/2018/08/19/5b784a46e5fdeaa3258b45c6.html http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2004/06/25/espana/1088136379.html https://mujerescontralalivg.wordpress.com/2017/10/26/el-derecho-penal-de-autor-y-la-inexistencia-de-denuncias-falsas-por-violencia-de-genero/ https://es.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ley_Orgánica_de_Medidas_de_Protección_Integral_contra_la_Violencia_de_Género http://justiciadegenero.com/la-asociacion-europea-de-abogados-de-familia-denuncia-los-perversos-efectos-de-la-ley-d…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:06 PM
3

Thank you so much for the clarification. I had a mental fart of huge proportions. I was getting confused even why someone would say so. I am going to edit the comment to take out the misunderstanding part.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:24 PM
8

If you are an heterosexual man and you are the perpetrator then it is “gender violence” (if you say domestic violence then you are accused of machismo), if you are an heterosexual woman and you are the perpetrator then that’s assault but isn’t “gender violence” which is considered a hate crime because by law it is assumed that the only reason of “gender violence” is because the victims happen to be woman (hence the name). The sentences for the accuser are higher and there is a plethora of advant…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:17 PM
9

http://www.elmundo.es/espana/2018/08/19/5b784a46e5fdeaa3258b45c6.html Marriage in Spain has fallen more than in the rest of Europe: https://elpais.com/politica/2016/08/10/actualidad/1470819999_080953.html Official statistics: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Marriages_and_births_in_Spain/es http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/0/00/Evolución_de_la_tasa_bruta_de_nupcialidad_en_España%2C_Matrimonios_por_1000_habitantes.png Divorce rate has duplicated …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 12:21 PM
7

I am trying to fix them. English isn’t my mother tongue, sorry.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:03 AM
1

It is a bad thing because it implies that masculinity is a bad thing that needs to be changed for a different thing. You distort the logic when you portray femininity as the only good thing and not wanting to change masculinity into femininity as something bad. It’s like accusing someone of having bias because they don’t share your actual bias. The fact that someone don’t have bias against masculinity don’t imply they have bias against femininity. Actually, that understanding of what valuing fem…
/r/MensRights21/07/18 03:01 PM
2

The case that was used to generate this “outrage” that justified this law is very curious. You have a girl that follow five men in the search of a hotel room to have sex. All five go ask for said room and the girl waits alone at the entrance but there is no room available. They keep looking at other hotels unsuccessfully. Finally, they go inside a building and they have sex on the stairs. It is videotaped. At one moment, one of them ask her if it’s ok to put “it” in the “back door”, she say yes.…
/r/MensRights18/07/18 09:20 PM
3

For me it also was the fact that there isn’t a single man in that movie who isn’t either evil or an idiot. It seemed completely on purpose.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 02:50 PM
1

And in Spain, women go to a career in education. Teachers. That of course explain a lot.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 07:13 AM
2

Please let’s not confuse get triggered with stand up for something.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 10:56 AM
2

And not just in the court of popular public opinion. Many people would kill that man if they had the opportunity. Certainly the parents could get away with it if they manage to do it, maybe without major repercussions. In any case people would call for his death and mean it. But that’s not the case so... let’s blame it on the children. Those terrible 10 and 11 year old rapists! Why didn’t anyone though of protecting this poor poor adult woman? They saw her, day after day, unprotected, being cons…
/r/MensRights23/06/18 11:38 PM
6

Not women, feminists. Women aren’t the problem, feminism is. It’s difficult to try to achieve equality when an ideology that is so hostile to men dominates all the narrative in our society.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 04:02 PM
2

I am going to bed now. I just wanted to let you know I am enjoying this and will answer tomorrow. I think there has been some miscommunication because you seem to believe I am defending some ideas I wasn’t meaning at all. English isn’t my mother tongue, so it’s understandable.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 10:35 PM
4

The term MRA is useful and precise now, because there is an imbalance of rights and opportunities that clearly hurts men but, because of the reasons I already explained, I think that humans in general have the tendency of integrate into our core ideas or personality however you want to call our identity the similarities with a “small” group of people that is defined by the differences with the rest of the people. We tend to think in terms of groups even when we agree that in regards to rights an…
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:38 PM
2

Thank you! Yes...It is a huge wall of text. I tried to edit it so there is a warning at the beginning but it didn’t let me.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:50 AM
1

You compare western countries and the rest of the world and assume that implies that there isn’t discrimination in western culture. E.g. we know discrimination in the application of justice is 62% in USA, if what you say is true that means that discrimination against males in non western cultures is higher, but not necessarily due to feminism. While feminism have extended the idea of in-group bias and patriarchy, your statements seems to suggest patriarchy don’t exist even in non feminist countr…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 11:05 AM
1

As I answered before the data you mention in the post is wrong. More importantly, you assume that if there is a correlation then it automatically becomes a UNIVERSAL CRITERIA to measure male discrimination. This is a logical fallacy, the fact that there is correlation between one variable and suicide gap don’t mean that there couldn’t be another variables with correlation to suicide gap too, meaning that the suicide gap don’t have to be a universal criteria to measure male discrimination for it …
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:28 AM
1

Globally, death by suicide occurred about 1.8 times more often among males than among females in 2008, and 1.7 times in 2015.[4][5][6] In the western world, males die by suicide three to four times more often than do females.[4][7] T https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_differences_in_suicide So there are differences in the rates of suicide between males and females depending if we measure them in western countries or in the rest of the world. This is the opposed of what you stated in the post…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:57 AM
1

Whether you are an egalitarianist or you are an anti feminist the starting point is the same. Rise awareness of men’s problems so the idea of patriarchy falls, feminism is exposed by the supremacist ideology that it is and from there we can have a conversation about how to make things fair (IMO just end all identity politics and “positive” discrimination and let meritocracy decide. Same rights and same opportunities, thank you very much) Feminism has opposed to shared custody as default, has opp…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 01:11 AM
2

I say that nowadays men are massively disadvantage in western societies. Just not for the suicide rates which, btw, one century ago men committed suicides at 30% higher rate than women, at least in USA, now its much much more. But in any case suicide isn’t the main indicator as anybody could claim it is because of whatever reason. Just look at the statistics: Justice: men receive 63% longer sentences than females for the same crimes with the same criminal records. Talk about systemic discriminat…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:59 AM
4

An account that has started posting less than 11 hours ago. An account with less than 1 day. I am sorry but nobody here is going to believe this pathetic trolling attempt.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 05:58 PM
15

They are crazy with cognitive distortion and psychological compartmentalizations and projection of their own in-group bias onto men. It’s weird that they think that men have all the power and use it for their exclusive benefit, and that therefore that would mean that men would not like women to men transgenders (not follow their logic here either, even if the premise wouldn’t be ridiculous). Also, if men have all the power and we use it for our own self-interest as an in-group bias, how they exp…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:13 PM
1

Dare I say... me too? Just a joke. I am one too.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 06:42 PM
1

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:52 PM
1

To be able to love, start loving yourself. I know, such an absurd thing to say or believe, but there is some truth in there. Affection is a reciprocated business, if your relationships want an asymmetric relationship you owe to yourself, and even to them, to find new relationships were you are seen as an equal, not a member of a dangerous wild species whose feelings are unworthy of consideration his opinions only accepted if accompanied with a bunch of caveats and qualifications and their role i…
/r/MensRights28/05/18 07:16 PM
1

Dave?
/r/MensRights28/05/18 06:51 PM
2

I would rather change it to equalitarianism. Not just as a PR thing but mostly because I think it reflects better the objective. Obviously it would defend the same thing, less identity politics and simply equality of rights and opportunities. I think that MR could be perceived as more of the same identity politics and as such, be interpreted as a war of the sexes thing.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:48 PM
2

This is madness, this sexual harassment accusation thing is completely out of control. I doubt people are safer now than before, it’s just a race to go to HR first.
/r/MensRights27/05/18 07:41 PM
2

I don’t see more problem than the double standards. If it would have been a woman’s body that would have been labeled as objectification. If that would have been two lesbians that would force most feminists to do some mental gymnastics to be ok with it. I think this objectification thing is bs. People control what they wear and, to a lesser degree, their own reactions to what other people wear as there are biological factors involved. It’s a double standard to wear red lips make up high heels an…
/r/MensRights22/05/18 11:42 AM
1

The fact that this view of MRAs was largely supported and that the majority of people that argued it was a bad characterization of MRA just claimed that we represent a different kind of misogyny than uncles should tell us it may be reasonable to try to change this sub’s rules for posting a little, not because this sub is about misogyny, but because we are scrutinized to a very very high standard, even a biased one, and we need to be aware of this. Public perception is key, and we play with handi…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:22 PM
2

I am there with you, both in gender and sexual orientation. I see this as a human rights case and the enormity of the lie (men aren’t oppressed, they are privileged) spreader through all occidental society baffles me. I may not be accused of rape (although I wouldn’t discount it so fast), or never had to face court bias in regards with divorce/child custody, or have to deal of false fatherhood, and other things, but I stoped being a feminist because I took interest in the statistics, and the sta…
/r/MensRights17/05/18 03:09 PM
1

https://youtu.be/ZnyA5Wn1K_Q
/r/MensRights12/05/18 05:44 PM
1

Let’s focus on the good things, social psychologists have a ratio of 17 to 1 between social liberals and conservatives but if you look their work regarding the differences in behavior between males and females in countries with more or less social equality as defined by feminism (they expected that the more feminism the more similar the behavior irrespective of gender) the results by the overwhelming majority of papers show a greater difference between gender behavior in countries with more femi…
/r/MensRights09/05/18 02:02 AM
1

If this training is considered too harsh then what’s the objective, that when the bullets start to fly over their heads they would start crouching and crying like babies?. Who in their right mind thinks that the army is some short of daycare? To criticize the instructor here just shows how some people believe that the army capacities and abilities should be impaired in the name of niceness, because war is so nice, you know? Because the army don’t have key functions right? I remember some words a…
/r/MensRights07/05/18 05:11 PM
6

Specially when she dismissed as a non issue that only 30 something % of enrollments are male which would imply 60% of female enrollments are female.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 11:00 AM
10

You never said that not all women are bad, that’s something so pathetically obvious that nobody needs to say. What you have been saying is that what you refer as “feminazis” are a radicalized group that is different than feminists. This is false at least at two different levels and also shows how in your mind you don’t differentiate between feminism and females. First, It is a logical fallacy known as “not true Scotsman” Second, regular feminist associations stopped the proposal for shared custo…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 12:39 AM
7

Please troll, that wasn’t even a good attempt to demonize egalitarians.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 12:23 AM
3

Spain has one of the lowest rates of rapes pero 100.000 people in Europe. A factor that may explain this is because there is a strong difference in sentences depending of the circumstances which may provide an incentive for aggressors to not escalate in their violence. For example this case is 9 years, if it was with intimidation (more about this later) or physical violence it would be close to 20, but you want murder to be 30 (recently has been a discussion of including life sentence in case of…
/r/MensRights29/04/18 02:37 PM
4

I believe the fact that he got strong support in his personal life by some political view have strongly conditioned his view about other issues that, inside that political perspective, comes in the same pack of ideas. I would rather consider my opinion independently of who supports it, but famous people have more problems to do that. Take journalists, this people make their careers preaching to the choir, when is the last time that you saw one changing their opinion?, even more, the media only s…
/r/MensRights28/04/18 02:58 PM
6

Its very telling seeing a troll trying to convince us that we should stop fighting because it’s going to be futile. It tells volumes about the lack of arguments and the fear of spreading facts and statistics that destroys feminism narrative. No wonder we are subjected to a slander campaign, you know propaganda and slander are the only things that allows inequality to continue, and of course you would like us to just shut up.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 04:39 PM
3

These people that want to risk other people’s lives because they are afraid (even if rightly so) should be ashamed, their cowardice may have extremely bad consequences for other people, specially when they have the option of calling the police or wild animal control and let a team of professionals do their job instead of trying to shame people into risking their lives. Using your neighbors as expendable tools is disgusting. This is real objectification. A lot of victimism, entitlement and suprem…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 12:05 PM
7

So true
/r/MensRights25/04/18 11:57 AM
2

I was a feminist till a few years ago. As many, I was thinking that feminism was fighting for equality of rights and opportunities irrespective of gender or other irrelevant variables. I suppose it all started once I started inquiring and investigating a little about it, nothing weird as I often like to inform myself of random things that grasp my attention and want to be able to contribute to a posible conversation. I starting researching statistics that showed how females were discriminated in…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 03:52 PM
1

There are studies that show that women that hear men talk about their feelings makes them less attractive in the eyes of the women, IF the feelings are not about how he feels about her and are positive, but rather his emotions, fears, passions etc... Now, we could talk about how much of that is nurture vs nature, but I doubt it's 100% nurture 0% nature (biology), otherwise you would expect to see a greater number of societies in which this wouldn't happen. Therefore the real question here is why…
/r/MensRights21/10/17 03:35 PM
2

I think that the effects of increasing diversity seen in the economy would be difficult to find till we address the methodological problem. Positive discrimination and targeting specific groups to teach them about the wonders of diversity and not other groups, including minorities, create a toxic work environment and don´t necessarily promote merit as a basis for promotion. In order to give a minority or underrepresented group positive examples that help them see themselves in such positions we …
/r/MensRights12/08/17 08:06 AM
1

The part of mental illness I think is offensive, for them and for use to put it in there. IMO, If there is proof of such thing that shows a correlation between feminism and mental illness OP should provide it immediately or remove this from this forum. My two cents.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:32 AM
1

It´s extremely difficult to don´t talk about feminism when addressing men´s issues because we are constantly portrayed as women haters and the like by feminism. So, say I would like to rise awareness about say males receiving 63% higher sentences than women for the same crimes and the same criminal records. How do I do that when feminism have already predisposed society, the media etc... to dismiss any claim MRAs make because MRAs are just a group of woman haters that try to use distorted data t…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:38 PM
1

It´s a captious question hidden as a non sequitur. Imo, a disgusting and arrogant way to start a conversation by advertising there is going to be a lot of hostility if answered.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:39 PM
1

May I ask, how is being antifeminist biased? Isn´t saying that actually taking sides like, if you aren´t feminist then you must be biased? Feminism have actively opposed and blocked proposals for equal reproductive rights, equal rights to education and equal opportunity of having child custody in case of divorce. They are a traditionalist ideology that refuses to break traditional roles when those roles favors women or discriminate against men. You can´t be egalitarian if you are a feminist, I m…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:27 PM
3

https://archive.is/VlNfl http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/08/07/contra-grant-on-exaggerated-differences/ "In the year 1850, women were locked out of almost every major field, with a few exceptions like nursing and teaching. The average man of the day would have been equally confident that women were unfit for law, unfit for medicine, unfit for mathematics, unfit for linguistics, unfit for engineering, unfit for journalism, unfit for psychology, and unfit for biology. He would have had various sexi…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:08 AM
2

Seriously? So we don´t see how this is a men´s rights issue? What about this. Someone talks about changing our approach about diversity, don´t making programs targeting a specific group (profiled and stereotyped as "white males"), argues that is a toxic work environment, that person later got fired and accused of claiming that women are worse engineers when all he said is that there are biological reasons (based on actual science) that proof that women and men have different tastes, not competen…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:54 AM
5

That´s not what he wrote. He wrote way more about personal taste and decisions define the number of professionals available at a particular field with a specific gender, and the number of google employees don´t reflect those numbers, nor the number of particular races on the USA population. I see the point of his essay to try not to policy outcome through political ideology being indoctrinated by HR. His explanation of the possible reasons women don´t pursue in a greater percentage careers in ST…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 12:52 PM
3

Hi, I am also Spaniard, although I live in Africa.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 12:12 PM
8

Spain is one of the countries with lowest deaths due to domestic violence. A little over 2 in a million women. The government don´t offer number of men killed by their wives or ex-wives. The law says that any accusation from a woman to a man have to be considered true at first, sending the man to a police station cell for between 24 to 72 hours. After that the man can´t come near the wife and eventually there would be a trial. Most of the accusations don´t end in a culpability sentence but any w…
/r/MensRights25/07/17 08:51 AM
2

Actually gay men have the lower percentage of domestic violence and lesbians have the highest rate of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 08:59 AM
1

How would anyone take our movement seriously when we don't complain when someone jokes about killing men? This is sexist and, even if not a big problem, specially not compared with many other boys and men face, it has to be denounced for what it is, sexist crap from someone that pretends to defend equality. We men haven't been playing the victim card and it turns out that's what changes society, it's sad, but it's true and the fact that we haven't complained for incredibly sexist shit is what ha…
/r/MensRights28/06/17 03:47 PM
1

If you refuse to read it how are you going to know what it is about? Stay on topic, read the post and answer the arguments. Otherwise that is an answer in itself and you already have my answer to that attitude in the second post. I could give you examples on how feminism is working against men's rights and therefore how your claim that men's rights and anti-feminism are unrelated don't sustain, but because you simple asume that because you believe the contrary and me criticizing feminism gives y…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:54 PM
2

Please don't assume that your opinion is everybody's opinion nor that the validity of an argument depends on its popularity. In regards to what you call "rambling on about feminism" 1.- My comment is perfectly on topic as answer to yours. Including mentioning feminism due to the parent commentary. I don't enjoy criticizing anything but if it's on topic then I don't see the problem. 2.- Feminism isn't perfect, if you are serious about equality maybe having an open mind about posible issues in whi…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 05:17 PM
1

Well, feminists have stopped the proposals for both men having the right to forfeit their father rights and the economic responsibilities that come with them and giving equal probability of having custody of the children in case of divorce. Therefore, if the so claimed defenders of equality don't want men having the right to decide if and when they want to be fathers nor their right to mainting access to those children how is it that feminists demand that men are equally responsible in the econo…
/r/MensRights16/04/17 04:43 PM
3

This is the most complete study on this issue: http://www.haygroup.com/en/our-library/whitepapers/gender-pay-gap/#.WPOODzz2GaM Less than 1,6% on average worldwide, and that 1,6% may be further reduced by other factors not accounted for. This study compare gender salaries in the same field, same job and same company. Hundreds of thousands of jobs compared.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:57 PM
3

This is the most complete study on this issue: http://www.haygroup.com/en/our-library/whitepapers/gender-pay-gap/#.WPOODzz2GaM Less than 1,6% on average worldwide, and that 1,6% may be further reduced by other factors not accounted for. This study compare gender salaries in the same field, same job and same company. Hundreds of thousands of jobs compared.
/r/MensRights16/04/17 03:38 PM
4

I like your attitude a lot man.
/r/MensRights15/04/17 08:22 AM
3

In order to measure discrimination sociology focus on 5 big fields (health, education, security/safety, work, and justice/legal system). I have talked about 4 out of the 5 big areas and if you want we could talk about the fifth so saying that I am focusing in some areas and not others is an attempt to deny that the discrimination is not systemic whithout any supporting argument except from anecdotal experience. Women and men, the same than any number of groups in which you separate the whole soc…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 09:57 PM
5

I would believe this when feminism do something with all the money and political and media influence that they have received in the name of equality to address the problems that overwhelmingly affect men. Instead, feminist groups have tried to stop awareness for these problems with intimidation tactics and accusations of misogyny. Of course this claim that feminism is for equality is what even their less radicals say, but even those turn a blind eye to what their leaders and organizations do all…
/r/MensRights09/04/17 06:43 PM
2

I don't agree with a few things Milo believes but he is a first successful step at visibility, best case scenario others will come that will talk MRA and not other stuff that has nothing to do with it, worst case scenario MRA will be associated with pretty specific political views and limit our attempts of visibility to other sides of the political spectrum.
/r/MensRights03/02/17 07:46 AM
3

Politics should be out of this, these posts don´t help us. Please let's stop linking broad ideologies with MRA, whatever they are, at this point it don't matter who started this trend of linking political ideology with MRA, it just have to stop.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 08:09 AM
26

"Spurling himself interviewed Donna: "I couldn't believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done. They'd squeezed the victim's testicles with a pair of pliers, beat him, burned him. Actually, I thought the judge's sentence was lenient. Once a jailbird, always a jailbird."" "But there was another moment, on our second day together, when she slipped verbally, and said in an almost irritable way, "He [the v…
/r/MensRights24/01/17 03:49 PM
1

You have to understand these people are immune to cognitive dissonance, their compartmentalization is way too strong.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 02:54 PM
2

Actually it protects feminine men more that gay men. There are lots of homosexual men that are far from this cliche of feminine gay men and quite honestly, I don't feel any empathy from the feminist movement, in their eyes we are just men and therefore perpetrators and part of the problem. I believe they have a problem with masculinity and equate it to toxic masculinity at every instance, unless you count feminine gay men as a short of masculinity of course. I have been accused of hating women f…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 09:04 AM
2

So true, and I don't know the answer but it seems obvious there are many factors that have had to come together for society in general only accepting one side of the story of how unfair is life. I believe the main reason why this persist is precisely because of the example you mentioned. Every time anyone tries to talk about men's problems and the discrimination either at a law/legal level or health, or education or safety/security etc... the answer is always something along the lines of accusin…
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:53 AM
1

I agree with this actually, I believe we should focus on statistical data instead of falling into the small number fallacy. Not that those examples are not representative but they aren't proof of a systemic problem, statistical data is and we should focus in promote awareness of it.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 08:15 AM
1

Here you have one.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 02:33 PM
1

"it holds no real-world value of it's own except it's use value to researchers and those looking to understand the movement from this perspective, the perspective of the History of Ideas" This, with all due respect, is ridiculous. If you believe that taxonomy in an academic context don't have value except for researchers I suggest you take a look at the history of the meaning of the words idiot or cretinism or imbecile and the effect that 19th and 20th century psychology had on those terms for t…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 11:21 AM
0

I don't understand, first you said that if anyone falls for this is a fool, then after Imnotmrabut makes a comment you say that "not surprisingly, you are falling for this", so you know Imnotmrabut, at least well enough to be sure, from your point of view, that he is a fool, and now you say that you barely recognize his username. The conclusion is clear, you are the kind of person that is able to judge others and even insult them with barely any knowledge about them. Either that or you are a lia…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 10:27 AM
1

perien This is not what I was asking, but in any case I can see that it´s true, meaning that you already have your conclusions and now you want material to fill in. In science one don´t have an answer before even asking the questions. This isn´t research, this is an attempt to provide legitimacy to conclusions that you probably choose because those are the expected/allowed conclusions from you as a student. How can you justify to come up with a new taxonomy for a group when you haven't had any p…
/r/MensRights18/01/17 10:09 AM
2

So, you want information, personal information and personal experience, but you don't provide any kind of information about you nor the institution you represent, only a vague promise to be objective while claiming that you don't agree with MRAs. We are the most vilified group nowadays and your proposal deserves a little more that just "a fair bit of suspicion". Given that it appears you have acknowledge that you don't agree with us, why don't you go ahead and let us read some parts of what you …
/r/MensRights17/01/17 01:58 PM
4

Unfortunately what would be the safest thing to do from a legal standpoint will only get you a lot of pain and injuries because nobody is going to help you (they assume that if you were really hurt you would do something) and even in the offchance you got help from a woman (men would face the same problem) then you would be shamed by society. And a significant number of feminists would cheer and joke on your suffering because you are a male oppressor. Remember that tv program?, the voice if I re…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 12:05 PM
4

But still that sacrifice amounted to some kind of recognition because it was expected and valued from any man. Nowdays this is "encouraged" just by positive punishment (shaming men who aren't whiteknights), but no positive reinforcement. Also the incoherence and hypocrisy, whiteknighting is encouraged by the women supposedly in peril, but it seems men still have to be lectured about how we can´t even talk about it so nobody can get confused into thinking that men can engage in misandry or have a…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 11:05 AM
26

I agree, that would be extremely painful but if you can´t count your family to support you when you are the victim..., even more, they condemn you for defending yourself, well, it means that, love or no love, they are going to keep hurting you with that kind of attitude. Their behavior is unnatural, not supporting their own son or brother when you just defended yourself. Shame on them, you did nothing wrong and don´t let anyone tell you otherwise. If you get in a conversation about this it´s goi…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:59 AM
18

e With people like her I wouldn´t recommend be alone in their company at all. They could destroy you easily by hurting themselves, or start hitting you and then spreading lies and portrait you as some kind of beast.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:55 AM
1

In Spain the Ministry of Equality spent 100.516.620 euros in 2011, a 8,83% reduction from the year before. Later the ministry was merged with the Ministry of Health, so it´s very complicated to know how much money they get from it. Then we also have the Women´s Institute, which got 25.553.670 euros in 2010. Also every state finances public organisms for the same ends in various amounts, and on top of that you have European funds for them too. Therefore it´s complicated to provide an accurate num…
/r/MensRights14/01/17 09:08 AM
1

Not only this, also the fact that you could consider it a problem with their bodies and not a mental problem because if mind and body don´t match that don´t mean that the mind is the one that has the problem and should change. It depends on what you think defines yourself more, your body or your mind. I believe the mind wins easily.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 11:33 AM
1

Imho this is not the way to go. Making punishment equal for the same offence irrespective of the gender is what I want to see.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 10:11 AM
3

This has nothing to do with men´s rights. Should not be here.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 09:12 AM
2

I don't think this belong here and quite honestly it alienates a part of the people that come here to talk and be informed about men's rights and problems. By associating political views, whatever they are, to the reason of this reddit will only divide ourselves and appear divisive to society as a whole. The most important problem about activism is trying not to make packs of ideas, the opinion of a person regarding climate change shouldn't be correlated with their opinion regarding gay marriage…
/r/MensRights29/11/16 07:10 PM
1

You are way more gentle than me. Thank you.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:12 AM
2

Hello again, since you have structured your post so well and with so many different paragraphs I am going to answer it point by point. "What I also notice are housewives. Being in some cases especially in cartoons abused by their stupid terrible husbands who are ridiculously imcompentant, and yet still successfully raise a family on a single income and are threatened every time their wife tries to or sucessfully finds work." You say it yourself, abused by their stupid terrible husbands who are r…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:28 PM
1

I read it, that was the small number fallacy from a subjective perspective that isn´t even up to date. What about this other article? http://www.intellectualtakeout.org/blog/boys-are-stupid-girls-are-awesome-most-tv-shows-movies-today Please explain to me how much discrimination against women there is when you have an industry that systematically portraits men as stupid and/or evil and women as perfect and, on top of that, women are hired more because of their gender. Explain how can you make th…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 09:17 AM
1

And another good post from her. Thank you!
/r/MensRights25/10/16 08:49 PM
3

Just about the last bit "In the long run, this will reduce American productivity, much to the profit of Europe, Japan or China." Look man, with all due respect, first, if the productivity in the USA decreases it's highly questionable that would translate in net benefits for Europe's population or China's, etc... Second, Do you think here in good old Europe feminism it's not as strong as the States? And finally, again no offense, but I have seen that curious habit of finishing phrases related wit…
/r/MensRights25/10/16 03:55 PM
1

So you showed two links to the same investigation based on an acusation based on the fact that women don't get 50% of the jobs, this in despite saying that women represent only 7% of the workforce in that particular field and you call that "a lot of well documented discrimination whithin the industry". 1.- Small numbers of one particular gender in one industry don't imply discrimination because it doesn't account for posible differences in interests, choices and tastes between the genders. Men h…
/r/MensRights24/10/16 11:13 AM
1

I always ask myself the same question. What would have happened if a man would have said the same? Also it's the fact that she is unashamedly confessing this in public an saying it was a fantastic idea.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 10:48 PM
1

I liked the first season but I am notorious for being able to blind myself to the bad stuff so maybe I didn't notice stuff that was there. Ghostbusters is where I draw the line apparently, it contained way too much misandry in order to not notice, nor that I would have enjoyed it anyway because it's tedious as f.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 10:34 PM
5

So according to her she should be treated as a child and the kid as an adult... I can only imagine the outrage that would arise if a man would have done the same... her mind atracted me and she is so mature for her age... I mean, how is it that women can use this shit to get away with anything? So at the end she got a new counselor and a new job because the host wanted to help her... wtf?
/r/MensRights23/10/16 10:22 PM
1

I agree, whether it's because she is a misandrist or because she wants to be covered on possible accusations of misogyny clearly shows how sexist society's and Hollywood is. The fact is that is specially unfair taking into account she acknowledged that female directors are demanded more than male directors. I believe it's happening like in STEM fields, women have twice the chances of being hired having the same qualification and experience than men because of the high costs of being accused of m…
/r/MensRights23/10/16 10:11 PM
7

The 11th and 12th edition appeared in the last half hour. You wouldn't understand the 12th without having studied the 11th throughly.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 08:11 PM
3

From my point of view you are trying to find excuses to justify an asymmetrical relationship from the start.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 03:16 PM
1

Making up another side to the story when there isn't is almost as bad as not mentioning the other side when it actually exist. I guess this is some sort of advance, at least MRM isn't ignored under the misogyny accusation anymore, now media seems to be toning it down to "a part of MRM". Maybe I am over optimistic but maybe it's progress.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 07:49 PM
20

She should go to jail for the rest of her life with no possible parole. I mean, we don't have the knowledge nor the technology to help this deeply mentally wounded individual, let's protect society from her.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 12:49 PM
6

Ouch, I thought that when things like these would start to happen then it would widespread quickly but it seems we have moved backwards and not forward, not toward more equality. Pretty sad.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:16 AM
2

If I would be a citizen of the USA I couldn't bring myself to vote for Trump but things like this would make me feel that the system is pushing me to go for an irrelevant vote or forcing me to chose between shit with salt or shit with pepper.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:13 AM
13

Finally!, this is so good, at least a tiny bit of progress. Which campus is this?
/r/MensRights20/10/16 09:40 AM
1

you still have not addressed how this lenient sentences are not going to serve as cover up strategy for people that might be considering committing a murder irrespective of the ethical question, precisely those people you said need to be locked away to protect society. You started justifying the leniency of this sentence and now you are using this case to promote different systems or approaches to justice than the one in place. If you would have said this case is terrible therefore probably we s…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 08:08 PM
1

Technically you wouldn't theorize, you would hypothesize, meaning you have no evidence to support it. If you think that people commit the same crimes with or without sentences I assume you wouldn't mind leaving in a society without any kind of deterrence. There are psychopaths and sociopaths and obviously the best way to deal with any kind of mental illness would be identification during infancy when the personality is still in development, but if you believe that no person in this world has tho…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 06:51 PM
1

http://crime.about.com/od/prevent/a/deterrence.htm
/r/MensRights18/10/16 05:42 PM
6

I am sorry but this is beyond ridiculous. We send people to jail supposedly for only a few reasons, including: 1.-to protect the rest of society of dangerous behaviors 2.-to provide incentives to the rest of society in order to behave in a civilized manner in the first place 3.-to teach the offenders that those behaviors are not acceptable. Those are the theoretical reasons, whether or not the third one is achieved is a different discussion. You only addressed reason number 1. Therefore, not sen…
/r/MensRights18/10/16 04:09 PM
1

Ok so first: ""We don't look at gender. We look at scientific discoveries," said Sara Snogerup Linse, the chairwoman of the Nobel chemistry committee." And later on in the article: "She said the Royal Academy of Sciences, which awards the prizes in chemistry, physics and economics, tries to do its part by urging people with nomination rights to suggest more women for the awards" Ooooooook, understood madam, you don't look at gender, in order to recommend that candidates are women I suppose you r…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:41 PM
2

I am an economist, and I can assure that Economics is not a science. We can't make controlled experiments that are repeatable and falsifiable. Social praxis in general need to go a long way before they become science. In fact the problem of nomenclature it's really important here, people don't usually understand the meaning of theory and hypothesis and the same problem arises between science and praxis. Even real scientists use the wrong name because otherwise the general population would unders…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:16 PM
1

Any of those actions is tantamount to pretend to pass for science what isn't science. Science is a method, if you don't follow it then it isn't science and keep using the same name to refer to it it's becoming part of the problem. In fact I don't see any disagreement between your comment and mine.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 02:46 PM
1

I believe that the point is to support science by challenging the bias that tries to introduce false claims pretending to be scientific. If science is done right it's objective and I believe we all should respect it. In other words, respect and accept facts while fighting false claims pretending to be scientific.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:00 PM
1

This. Point by point exactly this.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 10:15 AM
2

It's also almost imposible to demonstrate therefore it's not weird that is unprecedented. In order to have a precedent it would imply to have demonstrated that many different people lied about facts decades ago. You could say it's implausible, but by that same token the experiences of widespread alucinations would make easy to believe in so many absurd supernatural things.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 09:58 AM
1

With all due respect, I sincerely believe that my previous arguments included and superseded the arguments in your answer. Maybe I was unable to communicate my points due to English not being my mother tonge. If we want to attract more people to STEM (which is a very good idea) I don't understand why it has to be centered about an specific group and not any individual that has already proved that can do well irrespective of her/his gender. Also, your argument imply efforts to attract people to t…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 07:27 AM
8

In the economic system in which we live resources are allocated to the most promising investments in order to achieve the highest posible efficiency, meaning being able to achieve more with the limited resources that we have and therefore generating the highest posible sustainable economic growth. If we include variables that are different than merit for scholarships we are not assuring that those that are expected to offer the most to society but lack the financial resources to pay for that edu…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:44 PM
1

So many sad stories.... it's hard to read this stuff. Broken persons that broke others in different ways.... so sad. And the children, once you have them such beautiful love is taken as ransom forcing you to take the abuse, it's so incredibly sad.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 09:17 PM
2

Actually I think that it was not well explained. It's a standard all around the world to look for inequalities in societies (and therefore measuring racism, homophobia or sexism) by focusing in how different groups are treated in relation to health, justice, education, safety/security and work conditions. In every single one of them men are at a huge disadvantage in western societies except maybe in the last one and in some groups of age (and even this is highly debatable). There are more than e…
/r/MensRights14/10/16 10:17 AM
1

In what world is this called for? Making attacks ad hominem is never a good way to try to convince.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 07:47 AM
1

Well, I usually don't like to number the points I'm making while I wrote because I believe makes me look angry, but as you do it (I take it as a way to help clarify the conversation), I will do it too. 1.- English isn't my mother tongue therefore if I misspelled anything please excuse it and maybe, if you feel particularly helpful, please point out the right way to write it so it's easier for me to learn. 2.- I know he never spoke about spaniards or Spanish people in general (I think), therefore…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 05:50 PM
1

I am an Spaniard. Quite honestly, I would love to see less Trump support around here, supporting Trump isn't going to allow men's rights to be taken seriously when addressing the extremism and sexism of third weave feminism. I really don't understand this, that man is racist talking about Spanish people being mostly rapist and talking about building walls, etc.... Do you think supporting Trump is going to make menrights being taking seriously in Europe or almost anywhere around the world?, if yo…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 12:50 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter