TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ih-shah-may-ehl Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by ih-shah-may-ehl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

My daughter went to see the Barbie movie last weekend with a friend. On the way to the theatre: the bus driver leered at her a couple of guys at the station whistled and made a 'come hither' sign while yelling 'Coooome, pussy pussy pussy'. Next to the theatre was a barbershop with a couple of guys in front. As soon as they came in view, one of them made the others shut up, pointed to my daughter and her friend, and they silently gawked at them without looking away until they were out of sight. A…
/r/MensRights26/07/23 08:25 AM
1

Kind of late to reply here :) I don't visit this place anymore. Ostensibly, it's about 'men's rights' but it's really a bunch of bitter men who don't want women to have anything they can't have themselves.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 08:07 PM
-4

Abortion was a benefit to many men, and you guys concede that bodily autonomy and reproductive rights are important but because the situation was not 100% equal and men didn't have the exact same protection, the majority here seem to respond with glee and high fives that it was back to back alleys and coathangers. Incidentally this ruling can also be used as boilerplate to bring back jim crowe laws or end the right to gay marriage or even same sex relations but i expect you'd cheer just as hard.…
/r/MensRights25/06/22 06:22 AM
-1

I work in a large international company. Men favoring women, perhaps. But women favoring women? More likely to be neutral or knife each other in the back.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 07:44 PM
0

3 toilet facilities provided for women versus 1 functioning facility for men in A UK service Station. That's kinda normal everywhere, because the men's facility will have 1 toilet and 2 urinals, vs women toilets where they actually need toilet stalls?
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:08 AM
2

Most of the massive downvotes I get here is if I disagree with a borderline misogynistic comment.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:33 AM
3

Absolutely. This is not a male / female issue. Screwing around with hormones is bad for everyone.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:45 AM
5

All embryos start out as female until androgens kick in and they morph into males if Y chromosome is present, I doubt the natural estrogen they are exposed to by growing inside their mother is to blame for any of what OP is describing. I gave you an upvote because I think it's ridiculous and sad that you were downvoted for stating an actual biological truth.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:43 AM
1

He said most. He didn't say all. And this subreddit is an echo chamber that is far from representative of mrn in general.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:12 PM
-23

Wait. So you think a boy needs to be the best because of the 'mostly male' original fans? d v That is some crap reasoning. Tv studios don't owe you anything. And it it's sad that you are so upset at the thought a woman might be better at something.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 09:03 PM
1

No more than they know for sure I stay faithful or not. Are you saying your wife should always be suspicious and distrustful of you?
/r/MensRights13/05/22 04:35 PM
2

We all know the -possible- consequences of marriage. Legally speaking, you make yourself extremely vulnerable to the other person. I think everyone here can agree on that part regardless of what they think about marriage. It should be a foregone conclusion that you don't do that unless you actually trust that person.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 04:22 PM
1

If that is your mindset, don't ever marry in fact if you really think women are just waiting for the opportunity, don't even get in a relationship.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 02:09 PM
6

Because there are a ton of legal consequences in being married or not being married. You should only marry someone if you want those legal consequences to apply. If you are not married, you will never be considered legally anything but friends, which will have an effect on any kids you may have, inheritance, power of attorney, the ability of your partner to take medical or other decisions if you are not able to make them yourself, financial security and legal protection of the surviving partner …
/r/MensRights13/05/22 09:04 AM
5

Then you definitely shouldn't get married.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:54 AM
11

This reminds me of a story my friend once told me. He knew 2 Unix sysamins who ritually exchanged root passwords when they married :)
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:53 AM
8

You're in for a world of pain when she cheats on you. You think you trust her all the way up to the point when you realize she never intended to reciprocate that trust with loyalty or honesty. You are literally already starting off with the premise that your marriage will end like that.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:27 AM
-13

Now you do the math about which risk is greater. The risk is not the divorce. The risk you assess is whether you have a divorce where you need to worry about your partner putting CP on your phone. The point is: if you are actually worried that your partner might do that to you, you shouldn't be married to them in the first place.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:25 AM
17

I don't agree. You should only marry someone you already trust. After all, not only are your finances joined at the hip and you join legal and fiscal responsibility, but the person you marry also has legal power of attorney at times when you are not able to decide things for yourself. Your wife is literally the person who decides when to pull the plug if you are in a coma. For that matter, your wife is the person who could poison you. Marriage means trusting your spouse with your joint finances,…
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:08 AM
6

:D :D Truth.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:03 AM
-18

Do you ever drive anywhere in your car? Because there's a fairly high chance you get killed on the road too.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:58 AM
80

My wife and I have each other's phone codes. IF you cannot trust your wife / husband with your phone, you shouldn't be married to begin with.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:57 AM
7

Is there a severely negative side effect of it? You mean other than losing half the nerve endings in the part of your body that's key to sexual pleasure?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:51 AM
1

Carrying a baby to full term is nothing like breaking your back. You're doing the very thing you accuse me of. I was clearly talking about carrying a baby to term AFTER HAVING BEEN RAPED OR AN INCEST VICTIM. I mean I LITERALLY say that in the post you are replying to, 2 post up.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 05:52 AM
8

They are payed to make false testimony as witness against people they have never even met, shame on these people, the witch hunt against men is real That's kinda their job, not part of a specific targeted witch hunt. No matter who is on trial or what they have done, there will be experts witnesses arguing on their behalf.
/r/MensRights05/05/22 05:30 AM
0

Sure. In the same way that breaking your back is an 'inconvenience'. To call it that is to completely belittle the situation and declaring it equivalent to simply carrying a baby to full term.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 05:56 PM
-1

To an extent, it still applies. If half the men in Ukraine get killed, that is an equal tragedy to half the women getting killed in human cost. But for the Ukrainian society, losing half the women would cripple Ukrainian society for more than a century. I'm not defending this or saying that it's a good thing. I'm just pointing out where this is coming from.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:56 PM
-5

Because historically, men WERE disposable. If your village goes to war and loses half the men, but not women, then as long as the village wins, their next generation is not impacted. The same amount of women can have the same amount of children with half the number of men. The equation doesn't work the other way around.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:31 PM
-4

There is nothing more pathetic than people who force onto another what they themselves feel too precious to impose upon themselves in order to retain their privileged status. You may want to mention that in the discussion in this same forum where people seem to be ok with overturning Roe v Wade.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:29 PM
-6

Inconvenient as it is to give birth It's interesting that you include rape victims and incest victims in your blanket declaration of 'inconvience'.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:50 PM
8

Isn't it kinda normal in a trial that anyone will bring a pet psychologist or psychiatrist to argue their client should not be held accountable?
/r/MensRights30/04/22 12:30 PM
8

It's not a matter of belief. It's a matter of "Amber Heard must win". They don't care who is right or wrong, they just care who wins the court case. To be honest, in Belgium pretty much everyone I talked about this with, thinks Amber is the evil one and Depp the victim. When the media mentions this, they too highlight the evidence against Amber.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 05:36 AM
19

This seems true on every sub, even regardless of whether it's an activist sub or simply concerning a hobby.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 03:47 PM
-3

"I want a strong man who can take care of me" is literally what a majority of women say. No I'm not a troll. I just don't have much patience for arguments that blindly state things like 'literally what the majority of women say' just like 'all men are ...' or 'women always...'. But I'll bite: do you have a link to a study or a reputable source that agrees with the statement you make?
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:45 AM
1

If I were to ever have intercourse or even foreplay with a woman, I'd video record her reading out a consent form drafted by me and signing it on record without any duress or influence of drugs/alcohol. I'm sure it will set quite a romantic mood. Be prepared never to have sex then.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:42 AM
-5

Saying 'if we are together, I want you to accept all of me (kids, disability, ...)' is very different from saying 'I want to be with you so that you will take care of my kids / disability' One is about asking someone to accept a consequence, the other is to tell them they're just there for a reason.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 11:27 AM
-11

Luminescent's response is what it looks like when you are loved, valued, and dare I say privileged in society. wanting someone with specific traits just so she can be the gopher / personal assistant is not something anyone deserves. It's also quite dismissive of the concept of 'love' where both parties accept the other for whom they are. This has nothing to do with gender. A woman saying they want a strong man just to lift them back in their wheelchair would be equally wrong imo.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 10:48 AM
1

Are you american by any chance? I've noticed tbat any time anyone talks about making things better, americans immediately object because they can only think about possible abuse: proper social security-> abuse! Universal healthcare -> abuse! Paid sick leave as needed-> abuse.... It's like everyone is always so frightened that things are going to be abused that nothing ever changes. As i said someplace else here: i live in a country where paid sick leave is essentially unlimited and whenever i me…
/r/MensRights23/04/22 05:21 PM
-6

I live in a civilized country. EVERYONE has unlimited paid sick days.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 04:08 PM
3

My daughters and I talk about everything, even sexuality (not the act, but the meaning of sexuality). There is pretty much nothing that doesn't get talked about during evening diner. Communication is the only way to have any influence on the information they base their decisions on. And from everything my daughters tell me about their lives and their friends, it's great that we do so. Not only do they learn to think for themselves, but we know what is going on in their lives (which can be quite …
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:16 PM
-15

It is going to be paid sick leave anyway. So why would it matter to YOU whether they have to go to the doctor first or not? After all the doctor wouldn't know if you are 'really' in pain or not, any more than they know if I 'really' have a blinding migraine or not.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:11 PM
1

If you live in that context, you will know that they only have to ask for sick leave. This is a company initiative, it is certain to be abused. Actually in many european countries, you already don't have to have a doctor's note for a short absence. Theoretically women already can and do take such days. The major difference seems to be that a) in the countries where this is already possible, the company explicitly indicates this is ok, and b) in the US where workers rights don't exist, they make …
/r/MensRights23/04/22 12:09 PM
3

I live in a country with decent healthcare. Meaning sick days are unlimited and paid. I think it's really bad to think of 'sick days' as a privilege. As if healthy people should get upset that someone else is sick more often. Am a man btw, wife and 2 daughters.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 10:47 AM
-19

You realize that a) only a small minority would actually need a day like that, and b) this is LITERALLY no different from my male colleague who gets a bad migraine every so often bad enough he needs a sick day? You are intentionally taking this out of context to claim that all women will now just take a monthly holiday and the very few who have it really bad deserve no consideration. This has nothing to do with 'mens rights' any more than sick leave for bad migraines does.
/r/MensRights23/04/22 10:31 AM
-8

Many ugly comments here. Most women will never need this or take these. 'Some' will occasionally need this. And yet here you guys are griping and moaning that a company has some consideration for what is for some women a horrible problem. As if this is impacting you personally
/r/MensRights23/04/22 10:16 AM
1

Ehm: building a life together with an equal? Starting a family with kids? Being able to have a trusted person whom can act on your behalf and vice versa? If you marry an equal than marriage has the same value for 'both' partners. The idea that a man has different benefits of a marriage than his wife is immature bullshit
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:00 PM
0

Probably 90% or more of the reason men even get married is for the promise of regular sex in return for the 24/7 provision of support/cohabitation. That is bullshit. As if men are nothing but 'income provider' in return for access to 'the sex object'.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 06:55 PM
1

But you're never going to have the 'doing life together thing'. You'll be having a LAT relationship / FWB type deal. That is never going to be the same level of togetherness as actually 'being together'
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:29 PM
4

No. What the person above you is saying -I think- is that your text is grammatically pretty flawed, and combined with the fact that you sound bitter / angry and emotionally charged, it is very easy to see many possible interpretations.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 11:49 AM
2

No woman is entitled to my strength, money and safety. Only our Families and friends are entitled to our strength that we devoted to them to live as safe as possible. You don't consider your partner to be in the innermost circle of 'family'?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 11:46 AM
1

Don't do it. It's not worth it You are telling OP never to have a serious relationship again.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:57 AM
1

I wouldn’t advise anyone to move in with somebody after dating for only a year. Why is she asking about cohabitation knowing what you’ve gone through over the past two years? Protect your interests and live by yourself. Because if you want to have a long term relationship in mind and want to do this whole 'together' thing, actually being 'together' is not some kind of Alien idea?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 10:56 AM
1

Imo it doesn't help that just like on both sides, the ones on the furthest end of the spectrum are also the most vocal ones.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:35 AM
-1

They are what is described as useful idiots. And they are not respected by women. Am I a feminist man for advocating equal rights and equal pay or making important decisions together with my wife?
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:11 AM
2

Sadly feminists don't acknowledge that That really depends on what you define as feminism, no different than how women define incels.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 09:09 AM
1

Pretty low actually, because I knew them both, and she is one of my best friends whom I know pretty well. Money or keeping up with the joneses was never her thing. And she didn't come from money either. The more interesting question here is why you and the people commenting automatically assume that she did.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:26 AM
1

It was unfortunate for sure because other than that they had a good thing going. I grew up in a very traditional household as well, but my dad never made the association between earning and masculinity. If anything, mom was the decision make because dad was working.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:22 AM
1

You don't really know what goes on behind closed doors. Just because she seemed to not have an issue with it and even expressed to you that she had no issue, doesn't necessarily mean the tension was just an internal thing made up in the guy's head. She is one of my best friends and we know each others bad sides. And I knew him too, though not as well. But he had the 'I want to be the man of the house' thing going and not being 'the earner' was something that chafed. Just because this is a mensri…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:18 AM
-8

Hmmm. So common sense (and research) has also told us that women don't generally marry men who are less well-off financially as they are. Meh. I know a beautiful woman who is an allround great person and she manages to combine a high paid career with motherhood. And she had a great marriage until he couldn't deal with the fact that she out-earned him by a LOT. But for some reason this made him bitter and their marriage ended over it. And it's not like she expected him to do the household work be…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 03:29 PM
4

In Belgium they still had those tests a decade ago. They even included max BMI. It was all a bit ridiculous, because once you passed the test, you could get a beer gut and noone would mind. Training itself also tested only on field performance so the entire 'x pushups, x situps' is a waste of time. And since it naturally favors men, I think it's perfectly ok to lower those specific standards or get rid of them altogether.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 08:42 PM
10

In many cases there is a good case to be made for that. Traditionally there are many criteria geared specifically towards male physique such as number of push ups in a minute or so. In itself that number is meaningless when the real performance indicator is something like can you do a 20 mile trek with full gear. And it's doubly worth considering that those requirements are only used during selection and there are many active duty people couldn't pass selection agsin if their life depended on it…
/r/MensRights11/04/22 12:18 PM
6

I think the state supporting families with children is a good thing by itself, who will pay for your pension when you retire? This. A society that doesn't stimulate having a healthy population evolution will die and peter out, and have noone to keep it running by the time we are starting to depend on it.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 02:49 PM
1

Some people are really dumb: there is no such thing as toxic masculinity. Sure there is. Whenever men insist 'I do X just because I am the man' that's toxic masculinity. Any idea how many times people have mocked / pitied me because my wife drives the car when we go someplace? Apparently, the fact that she gets car sick easily unless she is the one driving and the fact that I love reading in the car while being driven somewhere is not good enough reason for many people and because I am the man, …
/r/MensRights05/04/22 06:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter