TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ihateusernamesalot Archive

View 0 posts and 179 comments by ihateusernamesalot on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

trivializing mental health issues and making them the butt of a joke, is this the men's human rights movement? Cause I coulda sworn y'all claimed mental health as one of your big issues. And yes I support violence against people who espouse genocide. I'm literally the worst. It's hilarious how preoccupied y'all are with me, and not the fucking nazis in your sub. Get some fuckin' perspective, yo.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:30 AM
1

Well I didn't say they were violent and I didn't espouse violence against them, so I'm still not sure what you're getting at tbh.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 01:00 AM
1

Haha, Nazis are "supposedly violent" Whatever you say dudebro
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:49 AM
1

What's ur point bruh
/r/MensRights02/06/14 12:12 AM
1

Sigh I was being facetious about caring about my posts being deleted. I don't give a shit about this sub lol. It is hypocritical tho, which is funny. I was not being facetious about advocating violence against fascists. I am 100% for it. They espouse violence against innocent people, and would carry it out given the chance. So I approve of preventing them from vetting the chance. And I don't give a fuck about the aclu. Sometimes they do great stuff, sometimes they don't.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 11:56 PM
1

I was being facetious dude... And lol at reducing white supremacists and Nazis to "ugly speech"
/r/MensRights01/06/14 10:07 PM
1

uh, I didn't. It seems like someone is infringing on my precious free speech! I also said I'd calm down when every fascist is dead, which got deleted too. But if you're insinuating that I'm trying to hide that, lol. and idgaf if you "criticized" JtO; I can't take a group that willingly associates itself with AVFM seriously. They're toxic and reactionary.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:53 PM
0

I'm gonna go with JtO's response to witnessing violence and pretend I didn't see it.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:26 PM
2

which is why dress codes generally prohibit boys from wearing jeans a t-shirts o wait. They don't. Because they aren't actually about "preparing young children to enter the workforce (which is p disgusting in itself)"
/r/MensRights01/06/14 07:38 PM
0

We can't stop them from posting here uhh... yes you can
/r/MensRights01/06/14 04:45 PM
2

AS does not cause you to be a misogynist...
/r/MensRights27/05/14 08:31 PM
5

not respecting boundaries
/r/MensRights27/05/14 04:29 PM
1

im an MRA!
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:14 AM
1

y'all are the most ignorant motherfuckers that I've ever seen when it comes to mental health. and it's supposedly one of your big issues, too. like read a book or something, god damn.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 09:57 PM
-2

lol no 1984 was not about trying to save the rights of clueless, privileged internet nerds to call people slurs. The government in 1984 was all for the same sort of domination that gives slurs power. Y'all got huge-ass persecution complexes to see yourselves as brave little Winston Smiths fighting Big Brother everywhere, lol. Orwell was a socialist who admired and fought with the anarchists and communists in the Spanish Revolution. You really think he was saying that people who argue that certai…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 05:13 AM
3

lol what's with MRAs and hyperbolic allusions to 1984? The Party did not challenge harmful language; they tried to control people and perpetuate inequality partially through manipulating language and stifling dissent. Literally the opposite of what is going on here. There is no connection to this and 1984 besides the fact that they both talk about language.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 12:12 AM
2

Thank you for acknowledging that. Gender is much more complicated than what we are taught in elementary school, and it doesn't help anyone to deny that. Especially people claiming to be a movement for gender equality.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 09:31 PM
2

There's no such thing as "genetics of a man." Some people are XX and have a penis and develop typically male. Some people have "ambiguous genitalia." Some people have XX and XY in different cells in their bodies. Some people have neither XX or XY. Etc. You don't know what you're talking about. Just sayin
/r/MensRights27/04/14 07:06 PM
-1

Damn bro, u really emotional. Maybe take a breath and go outside and read a book.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 08:57 AM
-8

It also certainly isn't determined by European imperialists imposing a false binary when people had already been figuring out and defining gender for thousands of years. But you can see pretty easily how genitals don't determine gender if you aren't willfully ignorant (good luck with that one here lol). If a man loses his penis in some accident, does he stop being a man? No. So it must be more complicated than that.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:53 AM
-11

no it doesn't. When it explicitly tells you that your assumptions about it are wrong and clearly explains the message, maybe you should take it at face value instead of manufacturing outrage...
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:43 AM
-8

gender is not determined by genitals
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:58 AM
-15

no shit it's not a "reflection of the real world," bruh. the game literally tells you that the point is that women can and do get harassed regardless of what they wear or where they go. It's just saying that women aren't responsible for their harassment. Y'all are way overthinking it lol
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:47 AM
6

dat self-awareness doe
/r/MensRights24/04/14 04:32 AM
-1

Naw, "die cis scum" isn't horrible. Maybe I'll care when cis people actually start getting murdered for being cis (never). Until then, it's hilarious and it illustrates our fucked-up priorities when it comes to trans people. We're talking about an imaginary, rhetorical threat to cis people instead of the daily, real-life threat to trans people.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:50 AM
-1

lol
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:04 AM
6

yall sure are trans-friendly. "cisgender" is a slur and is comparable to the n word. is dis real life
/r/MensRights20/04/14 06:40 AM
1

Of course it's sexist. They ain't banning t-shirts or other common clothes that boys wear that wouldn't be acceptable in whatever nebulous, boring-ass, hypothetical "workplace." Also, how exactly is this nonissue relevant to MRAs on the internet? Kids of all genders apparently don't like the dress code.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 07:40 AM
0

nah, it's more about teaching compliance and obedience. Middle schoolers don't need to be "preparing for the workforce" (barf), anyway. If you read the article, it's a pretty badass example of people working together and acting to resist authority.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 09:48 AM
0

psychologically controlled by men to commit rape and so on. hmm, now where have I heard something like that before... lol
/r/MensRights28/03/14 08:28 PM
1

You quoted her as saying she was triggered, right? And I would put the blame for that on reactionaries and bigots, not the overuse of a polite warning.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 08:01 AM
0

You don't think someone could have trauma related to abortions? There is no "SJW way of using it." There are, perhaps, some well-meaning but maybe ignorant individuals who are overzealous with warnings, but who are they hurting?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 07:39 AM
1

Wait, these people actually exist in real life? I always thought the whole triggering mania was an internet SJW thing. lol, it's a common mental health term, dude. I thought mental health was supposed to be one of yall's issues?
/r/MensRights19/03/14 12:31 AM
1

dat logic tho
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:32 PM
1

solution: gender-neutral bathrooms but uh, that's pretty disturbing, dude.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:22 PM
-6

lol, I don't even know what you're talking about, racist motherfucker. I actually wanna put off reactionaries like MRAs, so mission accomplished!
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:46 AM
-6

As a feminist and a hella cool queer person, I don't support this sort of thing. Gendering shit like this inevitably leads to gender-policing because they have to make sure you are the "right" gender for your ticket. Plus, capitalism is wack yo.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 10:13 PM
1

ACAB
/r/MensRights27/02/14 05:33 AM
0

Stop creepshaming me !
/r/MensRights26/01/14 06:10 AM
2

You are a gynophile lol why is MRA lingo always so creepy
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:29 PM
-1

lol
/r/MensRights25/01/14 03:48 AM
4

lol
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:30 AM
0

Nah, being grabbed by a rapist after trying to leave gives you permission to stab the rapist.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 08:16 PM
7

3) Push him away gently, as he seemed intoxicated and not violent wtf The dude puts something in the drink he offers her, repeatedly gets too close to her and makes her uncomfortable, and grabs her arm and pulls her back when she tries to leave. Motherfucker shoulda got stabbed in real life holy shit. This is probably the wackest mister thread I've seen in all my days.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:20 PM
0

apparently trying to get up and walk away doesn't send a clear enough message (not to mention it's a skit that intentionally doesn't have dialogue lol) wtf is wrong with y'all?
/r/MensRights11/01/14 12:09 PM
0

If women aren't the ones working, what labor do these mysterious items save them from :o
/r/MensRights07/01/14 07:29 AM
0

http://i.imgur.com/ouc0YMq.jpg
/r/MensRights18/12/13 09:02 PM
0

wow such intelligent so insight wow mras logic wow siense bill nye wow such sarcasm wow fearless
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:47 PM
1

It's internet activism. looooooooooooooooooooooooooooool MRAs.jpg
/r/MensRights18/12/13 08:33 PM
10

so, in other words, it's okay if you're a man see what i did there
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:29 PM
-1

wut MRAs have terms therefore they are in power which means they are making up shit in order to portray themselves as the underdog and maintain the status quo qed am I doin it right?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:59 AM
1

I searched for examples in that sub and I found more baseless whining from MRAs and explanations of the actual definition. So I find it more likely that MRAs are just jumping to mock something they don't understand.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:40 AM
5

SRS is not anticapitalist as a whole. Go to SRSD and search for capitalism. Anarchism has always been anticapitalist. Like, since before the internet. Even before the secret SRS society started up in 1939.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 08:40 PM
1

Do y'all just intentionally spread misinformation about terms and phrases feminists use or do y'all become MRAs because you misunderstand them?
/r/MensRights08/12/13 07:47 AM
0

dat persecution complex edit: wait, sorry, that's not PC on r/mr edit 2: downvotes really?!?!?!?!??! I will bravely leave this comment up despite the reaction from hyper-PC MRAs to express solidarity for my fellow anti-PC martyrs.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:36 AM
-21

Best way? I dunno. It sure was provoked though. Like, if Christianity is chillin there and it's all like "queer people suck and will be punished for all eternity," and some awesome queer person vandalizes a church and people are all "hey whoa that's too far," you kinda have to wonder what's wrong with that picture.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 01:19 AM
-1

someone better tell the men's rights movement lol
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:57 AM
-51

For real. Christianity promotes some pretty hateful things regarding gender and sexual orientation.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:24 PM
-8

More fighting institutionalized prejudice against race and sex by focusing on attributes people are born with, like race and sex, from a position within the institution. That's like, really reaching bro.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 06:19 PM
0

If by progressive you mean reactionary lol Have you seen what happens whenever trans people are mentioned in this sub?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 09:48 AM
2

No, but you can and should refuse to tolerate bigoted shit.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 08:54 AM
12

I would really think it would be best if this sub didn't take trans issues so lightly and throw around terms like "she-male" and "tranny". That ain't gonna happen. MRAs are more welcoming towards white supremacists than towards trans people.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 07:04 PM
0

What's the difference?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:23 AM
-5

I'm going to hazard a guess and say that he probably doesn't think of her as a number. and he's p cute too
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:41 PM
1

That ain't how biology works, yo.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 05:06 PM
-1

politicians who were more peaceful lol
/r/MensRights09/11/13 04:41 AM
3

I never said anything about the feminist position on any of this. I recently called out some feminists for ableism, too. Guess who was more receptive tho
/r/MensRights06/11/13 11:44 PM
3

That's a good question, too. My point is, it's hard to take MRAs seriously when they say suicide is one of their issues, but drop advocacy for mental health when it's inconvenient, or even act counterproductively in some cases. Y'all tolerate a lot of shit for a supposedly legitimate rights movement.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 11:04 PM
2

Mental health is the bigger picture, in case you couldn't tell by my entire first response to you being about mental health.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 10:53 PM
2

The bigger picture than piles of dead men? Yeah I guess we should be good little feminists and ignore all that. No, the bigger picture that leads to suicide, dude. Jesus, I guess I have to predict every paranoid MRA fantasy when I talk to y'all if I want a coherent response.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 09:39 PM
2

Y'all don't seem to care about any of those things except to use as excuses to berate feminists. Even in your comment right here. I've seen an especially bad track record with mental health issues here. MRAs claim it's a men's issue, but then they mock the term "trigger," which is super common in therapy and discussions about mental health, they are extremely callous towards suicide attempts they perceive to be "a cry for help," (some even said they wished that feminist dude a while ago had been…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:48 PM
2

All I'm saying is, why whine about how supposedly dangerous they will be for men in terms of false accusations when you could actually find out how dangerous they are (which is probably not at all)? I guess making baseless claims is ok but challenging them makes me a troll. Weird.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 05:29 PM
-1

They already have gender-neutral bathrooms in some places, yo. So you don't even need to make vague, baseless predictions about them. But I guess if the mrm was based on facts and junk it wouldn't exist lol
/r/MensRights06/11/13 08:45 AM
-1

This is a logical fallacy that assumes properties of the most visible members of a group are held by all members of the group. lol Is that the actual definition for that silly term? It's way better than I could have imagined based on the context. Using this term should be called the "'apex fallacy' fallacy," imo, as long as we're making shit up.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 09:06 AM
0

How is this a mens rights issue? Maybe she was having a bad day. Maybe she misheard you. Maybe she's just an asshole, but why take it personally? And that's just even if (an enormous "if," considering the context) this actually happened, and happened the way you described.
/r/MensRights04/11/13 08:56 AM
4

I also don't see any problem with still calling myself an anarcho-syndicalist or libertarian-socialist. There may be some republicans and libertarians I might be forced to back if they're vocal enough on our issues. L O L "as an anticapitalist I might vote for a capitalist but feminism is eeeeeeevil"
/r/MensRights29/10/13 11:20 PM
7

except you can have combinations other than XX and XY, and you can lack the relevant part of the Y chromosome, and you can have XX with an X that picked up the relevant part of the Y chromosome, and you can have cells with different combinations of sex chromosomes from other cells in your body, and all kinds of other differences. transphobes are bad at biology. You can't know anyone's chromosomes for sure without checking, and it's never ever relevant unless you are a scientist studying sex or s…
/r/MensRights29/10/13 05:59 AM
-2

lol Do you understand how chromosomes work? hint: it's more complicated than what they tell you in 7th grade biology.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 04:33 AM
1

How about when people joke about prison rape and even sincerely say that it's simply a deserved consequence of being in prison?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 09:39 PM
0

It's like a Rorschach test for shitty people.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:54 AM
0

It's funny how much TERFs have in common with MRAs. Y'all are just so determined to be disingenuous.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:36 PM
-2

But just to be clear: you're comparing the advice to not get passed out drunk in front of strangers to saying women should be terrified of every man who acknowledges their existence? Um, no. I'm pretty sure if this woman called the cops every time a man noticed her it would be mentioned in this story. I'm comparing exactly what I said I'm comparing. But, more importantly, all these things stem from the idea that people are responsible for preventing their own rape, which is popular among MRAs. E…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:05 PM
-6

Wait. So women are supposed to be careful about when/where/how much they drink and what they wear, but they absolutely should not be wary of men because that is misandry? #ironicat
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:24 AM
4

I heard he ended up being an SRS mod and a reddit admin.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:02 AM
1

I don't think that's a given; it sounds like you're just making stuff up as you go.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 11:11 PM
0

Fair enough. I don't really have a problem with reasoned criticism, just the hostile, misinformed mockery.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 08:21 PM
2

Why would you feel guilty for belonging to a dominant group of people in your society? Who is suggesting you did anything wrong?
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:46 PM
2

Because it's not something to be ashamed of. It's not even about individuals, but groups of people.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:35 PM
2

You didn't explain how it is shaming.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:25 PM
2

I think that's the point. It's a technical term with a specific definition, so this seems like semantics. There is no way to "fix" it, yes, but thinking about how it affects your interactions with people is helpful.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:37 PM
2

How is it shaming someone to remind them of things they take for granted?
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:31 PM
-1

You're paranoid, dude. Maybe you should let the rational people talk until you can get your feels under control.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 02:02 AM
-1

Actually, just because they asked you a question at the beginning of their comment doesn't mean their entire comment is based on a particular assumed answer. I thought you skipped the rest, so you can't possible know what they argued, right? Gosh, are men always this emotional? Can we get a logical person up in here to answer these questions?
/r/MensRights18/10/13 07:26 AM
-1

Yeah, you don't really seem to understand what autism is, so it doesn't mean a whole lot that you think a significant portion of people you've never met would be diagnosed with autism simply because they are "awkward or shy."
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:34 AM
0

You're pretty arrogant to try and tell me you know whether or not I'm exploiting something. I'd have thought I'd have known for myself. It's not arrogant at all. The exploitation is a result of your actions; whether it was your intention or whether you were aware of it is irrelevant. What is arrogant (and counterproductive) is making ignorant claims about autism to attempt to further your cause. I know this, but as I posted above, cases of autism where there is something objectively, provably ab…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 09:19 PM
2

I don't think you really know enough about autism to suggest that, and there isn't much evidence to support it. A lot of disorders have gender differences in frequency. Diagnoses aren't perfect and some people are near the arbitrary line, but that doesn't mean autism or anything else is the new hysteria. There aren't abusive "treatments," for one. For adults diagnosed with Asperger's, there aren't really any treatments at all. If there are certain symptoms you are bothered by, you can get help w…
/r/MensRights16/10/13 05:21 PM
1

Psychologists generally can't prescribe medications, and there aren't any drugs specifically for autism. Comparing it to "hysteria" is pretty unconvincing and hyperbolic. You just made a bunch of different claims, and didn't really argue how or why you think they are related and how they support your "view" on autism. Please don't exploit autistic people to support your conspiracy theory against men. It certainly isn't helpful to men with autism.
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:32 AM
1

I will be sure to tell them a dudebro on the internet thinks they are fake because they aren't jerks. Also next time I'll make up a facebook screenshot to lend my story credibility.
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:43 AM
0

lol, a white nationalist? Are you kidding?
/r/MensRights14/10/13 08:32 AM
1

I have something to share. I thought y'all might find this cute. So I'm in this class, and the majority of the students are women. No one is a self-proclaimed mra, but there are several feminists. Now, whenever we talk about something related to gender, the class overwhelmingly stands up for men. And they aren't assholes about it, either. There's no "feminists suck; look at this terrible thing a woman did," etc. They're like "I don't think X is fair to men," and we discuss it. Moral of the story…
/r/MensRights11/10/13 03:05 AM
0

There are "good" White Nationalists too no there aren't wtf? Is this what MRAs actually believe?
/r/MensRights11/10/13 02:54 AM
2

Sometimes I wonder if certain comments in /r/mr just come from a word generator. Tons of buzzwords with little substance. Hyperbolic oversimplification. Often no supporting evidence, hypothetical evidence beginning with "imagine if," or, my favorite, "it doesn't matter if this didn't/hasn't happened, cause it's the kind of thing that totally would."
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:30 AM
1

If there are, they ain't the ones spouting this ignorant shit here.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 06:38 PM
1

Bro, there was clearly some implication of women as a whole having less of a claim to the building because women weren't involved in building it. And there were still gender segregated colleges right around that time, so it's pretty relevant. And I'm amazed (not really) that a supposed human rights movement is so afraid of some civil disobedience, especially since it happened 40 years ago.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 04:52 PM
-1

lol wtf Y'all don't make a lot of sense sometimes. How many of those male Harvard students built the building?
/r/MensRights02/10/13 07:47 AM
1

You're comparing a lot of different things that aren't really analogous, but to humor you for a second, maybe because it works better? I'm going to guess that trans people, people who study the surgeries and hormone therapy, and people who study gender and sex know a bit more about the subject than MRAs.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 11:14 PM
1

No, there were two main communist factions. He considered himself a communist or was interested in communism and wanted to fight in the soviet-backed communist faction. They turned on the other communists and the anarchists and that's what his conception of communism became. He was a socialist after and he said as much. So nice try, but Orwell was totally a leftist.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 07:44 AM
1

He was a socialist who fought in the Spanish Revolution alongside communists and anarchists :|
/r/MensRights01/10/13 05:42 AM
0

Y'all are trying to change the definition of Orwellian terms, so that makes you a leftist or something? lol uh oh I used "y'all," a gender neutral term. I'm literally Big Brother/the Party/O'Brien. P.S. I don't think you know what "leftist" means, or you wouldn't be a fan of Orwell.
/r/MensRights01/10/13 04:02 AM
1

they said, in a comment typed up on a computer and posted to a website on the internet for people all over the world to read
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:15 AM
1

What the fuck does all this have to do with switching to gender neutral terms? Or with this poster?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 07:01 AM
1

And this is just more proof that feminists are leftists/totalitarians. lol No one is talking about banning male-specific words as the default. They are arguing that people should use gender-neutral terms as the default. It's not about control, it's about being inclusive. It's hard to take y'all seriously when you see big brother everywhere.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 04:50 AM
2

You're an SRS's. lol I'm a wut
/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:18 AM
4

evolution clearly didn't leave you with much wit lol
/r/MensRights29/09/13 02:06 AM
8

A man is a man when he ACT'S like a man. When he fore fills the gender role that evolution assigned him which is to protect, lead and dominate. lol when was the last time you took a biology class, yo?
/r/MensRights29/09/13 12:55 AM
1

The first one isn't even conceivably relevant. And newspeak is more about manipulation and censorship and stifling dissent, and less about, you know, encouraging inclusivity, no matter how petty you think it is.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 11:32 PM
1

You're right. I guess we should check out who she's been pallin' around with too. And do you know where she was born? I sure don't. Maybe we should check out her birth certificate. Also, I wouldn't be (and am not) forgiving of any politicians because lol politicians.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 09:31 PM
1

Who gives a shit whether she has or hasn't? She's just one person. It's a contextless quote she said 15 years ago and hasn't spoken about since, as far as I can tell. You'd think she'd be currently insisting on the quote and being lauded for it by the way it's brought up in every single post related to war in r/mr.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:11 PM
1

I would advertise a book club for MRAs to actually read 1984 so they stop making ignorant allusions.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:34 AM
3

Look up the full quote. Hillary's position is that women are the 'primary victims'. I dunno, I think it would be pretty disingenuous to take a couple sentences you spoke in 1998 and say that they represent a position you hold. Don't y'all have something better to talk about than an ignorant thing someone said 15 years ago?
/r/MensRights28/09/13 08:19 AM
2

Yeah, well, the title of this sub is "MensRights," so I guess you can't always trust titles.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 07:28 AM
-1

The point is that banning a highly gendered item for everyone isn't equality. Except in a pedantic, superficial, contextless manner, but I guess that's r/mr's goal so good job?
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:51 AM
0

I'm pretty sure men can carry purses, yo.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 09:47 PM
0

It's a strawman because it's accurate, and this is a better analogy because it fits with my worldview. misterstm wow such logic so rationale wow wow STEM critically think 2+2=4 so winston smith
/r/MensRights25/09/13 02:55 AM
0

For some reason, I don't think this would be the response from MRAs if, say, a business mandated that all their employees, regardless of gender, wore skirts.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 11:11 PM
0

No, and men get banned on SRS and r/feminisms all the time. and that's their right - their sub-reddit, they decide. That's cool homie. I'm talking to the dudes who make allusions to 1984 about feminism. No, they prevent you from speaking there. You are free to speak anywhere else. Not really any more than downvoting. You can make a new account in seconds.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:17 PM
1

But apparently other subs owe misters a platform? And bans do prevent you from speaking? lol I thought this was a place for logics.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:23 PM
1

maybe if they repeat it enough it'll feel true :3
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:56 AM
1

hth
/r/MensRights23/09/13 02:04 AM
4

There's no definition there, homie.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 01:44 AM
2

Then maybe you should humor me and define gender and the genders.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 01:15 AM
3

Gender is so simple that I can't explain it except in a circular way, and anything I didn't cover is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 12:56 AM
3

You what. What else do you call it when you hide dissent from view and limit the ability of dissidents to speak? Hitler? I didn't say it. But you bring up a good point. Y'all got a lot of white supremacists and neonazis and junk up in here.
/r/MensRights22/09/13 09:26 PM
8

I dunno, brah. Every time I ask for sources or an explanation of one of y'all's reasoning, I get people avoiding the questions, repeating themselves, etc. Seeing how pro-censorship this sub is, I also get downvoted to the point my dissent is hidden from casual onlookers. I'm also forcibly stopped from replying in a timely manner. You know who else likes to stifle dissent?
/r/MensRights22/09/13 05:05 PM
4

The MRM makes a big deal out of facts and logic lol good one
/r/MensRights21/09/13 08:02 AM
1

And they clearly didn't know what words mean, because choosing to get an abortion can be a consequence of pregnancy. It's an invalid argument, but it's not analogous. Abandoning your child isn't accepting any risks or consequences or responsibilities, because there literally are none if you have the ability to do that. You can't say "X is analogous to Y because it sounds the same and I can't explain why other than that." Analogies don't work that way bro.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:59 PM
-1

I don't think you're paying attention. Deciding whether or not to get an abortion is a potential consequence of sex. Becoming pregnant and getting an abortion is consistent with accepting the consequences of pregnancy. Abandoning your child without attempting to help them in any way is not (whether or not it's justified by some other argument).
/r/MensRights17/09/13 05:16 PM
-1

Why would that mean they shouldn't get child support? Didn't their partner also choose to help them get pregnant? Also, women don't get child support, children do.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:06 PM
-1

I explained how it was a different argument. Getting an abortion is consistent with accepting the risk of becoming pregnant.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:47 PM
-2

I don't think anyone is asking for women to be able to avoid becoming pregnant while still having sex without using any sort of birth control, so that's not analogous. Getting an abortion means you have obviously accepted the risk of pregnancy because you are already pregnant, silly. I thought the MrM operated on LogicTM rather than feels but I guess I was mistaken?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 08:04 AM
1

ok
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:14 AM
1

You were advocating them. lol
/r/MensRights14/09/13 11:51 PM
1

Man, y'all are just like hypervigilant about jumping to conclusions all over the place. I didn't say either of those things. I said acting out internet tough guy revenge fantasies is myopic. You've been watching too many movies, bro.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 09:24 PM
0

lol dude murdering someone won't bring back your family, it will put you in danger, and it will likely mean going to prison and losing your freedom for a long time, not to mention taking you away from the people you love who are still around If that's not myopic I don't know what is. And that's before you even consider that other people exist and have feelings too.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 06:53 PM
1

I guess I'm just not violent and myopic enough to be an mra.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:51 PM
0

Wow that's a lot of rude and misguided vitriol. I don't think you read my comment. Also, if you want to be a serious rights movement, you probably should avoid ableism. Sometimes you guys like to claim the mental health of men is an important issue, but then you just throw them under the bus like that.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:01 AM
-1

Um, no. What would that accomplish?
/r/MensRights14/09/13 01:31 AM
-5

And if you noticed I never said she was justified. I was just amused by all the anger, and then the approval for the sentiment that someone would totally murder her if they were involved in the story
/r/MensRights13/09/13 09:01 PM
-2

An imminent threat to your safety.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:47 PM
-2

Yo dawg, you flippantly dismissed the idea that her husband could potentially have "provoked" her by saying he clearly didn't push her off a cliff. I was just being flippant right back. And, just to be clear, I'm not saying he did.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:07 PM
-7

She didn't throw you off a cliff in your fantasy about killing her.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:48 PM
-16

Did she punch you? How do you know her husband didn't punch her?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:40 PM
-14

So, given that you would murder this person if she pushed your brother off a cliff, is it safe to assume that you might very likely murder other people and are therefore a threat to everyone? How should we deal with you?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 04:10 PM
5

I'm a man, and I would be disappointed and scared if I were being harassed by a group of people bigger than me, and everyone stood by. Also, I have a hunch that the author wasn't being super literal, and the point she was making is that people see that behavior as acceptable or mildly rude instead of the harassment that it is.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 03:40 PM
4

Sure. You said the "fact" that she "expects people to fight her battle" tells you that she expects it because she's a woman. If just that one "fact" leads to your conclusion, there couldn't be any other possible conclusions because you didn't point to anything else to rule them out. But there are. For example, maybe she thinks people in general deserve to be defended when outnumbered and harassed. hth
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:22 AM
-3

the fact she expects people to fight her battle shows me that this girl in particular (in any other girl who would have tought the same) thinks it is her right to be defended from assholes simply because she's a woman i thought men were supposed to be good at logictm or something
/r/MensRights13/09/13 01:35 AM
1

So I guess I can sort of understand that, but this is where it gets really weird: Why do women need a "Women's running magazine"? I got this one, bro. This is called capitalism. Some people were like "can we make money selling a women's running magazine? Yes, we sure can." Women didn't come together to determine that they needed a running magazine. Some people determined that they could sell women shit they (probably) don't need. hth Also, like what kind of men-only club do you want? Every physi…
/r/MensRights11/09/13 08:09 AM
0

No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites. That's the rule I'm referring to.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:25 AM
1

I'm on to you, O'Brien. For reals, tho. There would be too many comments to screenshot. Your best bet would be to go to one of the dreaded subs that we dare not speak of (the main one for calling out shit, or the talking one for talking about shit), and search for "rape." Maybe throw in "male" or something. If you really want I could PM you some links. edit: if you wanna be super fancy and junk, you could even make a post there.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 07:04 AM
-2

I could channel my inner Winston Smith if you like and bravely post a bunch of links. But you would have to be ready to save them because I don't know how long big brother would allow them to stay up before I am whisked away to be reeducated.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 04:20 PM
-3

I can't link them because this sub hates free speech and doesn't tolerate links to certain other subs.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 07:56 AM
-2

This post is a good example, have you had a discussion of male rape in a feminist sub? Uh, yes.
/r/MensRights09/09/13 05:30 AM
1

Where do you get the idea that anyone is expecting you to give up anything?
/r/MensRights04/09/13 09:03 PM
0

You mean like portal or tetris or something? Is it really that hard to imagine? that's so sad :(
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:51 AM
0

feminist tactics of silencing, name calling, expelling, banning, etc. mfw
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:38 PM
0

You know, one of the highest voted comments on this post is from a white supremacist, so... Talk about "toxic garbage," lol
/r/MensRights24/08/13 08:03 PM
3

wut Calling an anti-semitic pedophile a terrible person is not an ad hominem. That junk in your third paragraph is not the same as "you can tell who controls the world by who you can't criticize." Sure, "not being allowed to criticize" (whatever that means) people in power might very well be the reality in many situations, but saying that it's inherently an indicator of who is in power (not to mention crying about censorship when no one is censoring you) requires a kind of right-wing pseudointel…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 05:40 PM
3

If I'm understanding what you're asking, no because feminism wouldn't make that silly argument. Moreso than being thought up by a terrible person, the problem is that the statement is super nebulous. What does it even mean to say you "can't criticize" some group of people? The main criteria here (also with the original dude, I would imagine) seems to be getting called out for being a jerk, so it's a pretty low bar. Also, why wouldn't the people in power just let you criticize them and make it il…
/r/MensRights17/08/13 07:29 AM
4

That was deep.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:11 PM
0

I think the logic of the quote is flawed if he argued it applied to Jews. Just sayin.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:11 PM
-3

Yo dawg, I'm pretty sure the guy who originally said that was an anti-semite and he was referring to Jews. So yeah. I mean it's pretty fitting that that's where you'd get your inspiration, but I think you should know what it looks like.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 03:33 PM
2

If you genuinely cared about the mental health of men, or anyone else, you wouldn't be mocking someone who attempted suicide, no matter how much you disagree with them. You also wouldn't be dismissing it as a "cry for attention," a myth popular among edgy internet misanthropes and pretty much no one else, certainly not therapists or psychiatrists or anyone else dedicated to actually helping people. This is not a very welcoming place to depressed and/or suicidal men. If you sincerely care about t…
/r/MensRights05/08/13 03:48 AM
1

Why not?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 07:25 AM
1

stop troll-shaming
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:22 AM
1

Just so we're clear, could you give me a summary of what you think the entirety of coverture was and how it affected women?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 11:36 PM
4

A married woman could not own property, sign legal documents or enter into a contract, obtain an education against her husband's wishes, or keep a salary for herself. If a wife was permitted to work, under the laws of coverture she was required to relinquish her wages to her husband. In certain cases, a woman did not have individual legal liability for her misdeeds, since it was legally assumed that she was acting under the orders of her husband, and generally a husband and wife were not allowed…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 05:50 AM
0

...because usually, scientists who are worth listening to, are extremely measured in their proclamations. Of course, but "torn apart" implies more than mild constructive criticism mixed with praise. And he takes issue with her dismissing the importance of those empirically demonstrable gender differences with experiments which tweak social factors specifically to eliminate those differences. He doesn't appear to be misinterpreting what she says. He talks a lot about the first chapter of her book…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 06:13 PM
0

Why do you assume that, because I only linked to a single well-reasoned criticism, there exists only 1 criticism from a well-respected scientist? Here is another one...from the former president of the APA. What I'm saying is that these links don't exactly paint the dramatic picture you described. Yes, you should be careful and not completely disregard any suggestion of biological differences. That's pretty obvious and not very enlightening. I'm actually reading her book right now, so I'm interes…
/r/MensRights25/06/13 03:56 PM
5

The book she referenced was celebrated by left-wing political assholes, and torn apart by actual well-respected scientists working in those fields. How do you interpret one (apparently infallible) person criticizing a part of her book as being "torn apart by actual well-respected scientists working in those fields"? He sounds pretty defensive, and, if you look at the interview with Cordelia Fine above, he misrepresents what she says. Not to mention that this doesn't even consider the context of …
/r/MensRights23/06/13 09:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter