TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

il_Pater Archive

View 1 posts and 33 comments by il_Pater on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
780

Red Pill Theoryil_Pater/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 12:08 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Very good, sir. A+ trolling. You even had me going for a minute, until I saw how much chum you'd thrown into these comments looking for a bite. At that point I realized that since no true Red Pill man would be so irrationally threatened by another man's success, you had to be conducting an impromptu frame check. Good work.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 10:34 PM
4

Lost frame there, my man. Take a break, come back in a few minutes, and try again. No worries. Practice makes perfect.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 10:28 PM
2

Keep holding it as long as they let you. My notes aren't handy, but a common component of a "lonely hearts"(?) scam involved "soul gazing"; staring intensely into the mark's eyes for an extended period of time can create genuine (if temporary) feelings of affection in the mark. I think the time specified was two minutes? Or maybe I just saw that on TV. In either case, it's worth a shot!
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 09:45 PM
1

Fascinating! You have just shot my free time this evening; there is research to be done!
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 09:39 PM
9

Practice makes perfect. Don't think of a missed eye contact opportunity as a failure. Think of it as practice, but without the best form. Just like lifting. Lift again, and concentrate on your form. Eventually, it'll be second-nature.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 09:37 PM
13

That's not a rhetorical question. Really ask: "What if she gets mad and tells her mate?" What if? Is he really going to punch you in the face for making eye contact? Well, I suppose that's a theoretical possibility, but it's not especially likely. Many other outcomes are far more probable. Your fear is not proportional to the likelihood of the proposed event. Just remind yourself of that as often as it takes.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 09:24 PM
1

Duly noted! I shall adjust all future parables accordingly. [If I didn't have a personal embargo on smilies, I'd insert one here]
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 06:23 PM
47

I've been there, friend. Most of us have. There are very few natural born alphas in this society, and even fewer​ who stay that way into adulthood. Keep practicing, keep self-improving. Acknowledge your failures and mistakes, but don't let them rule you.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 06:20 PM
36

This is my own experience, so take it for what it's worth.. It doesn't matter. Just like it's a rookie move to walk into a business establishment and ask "Are you hiring?" instead of saying "I'd like an application", trying to establish a level of interest in a glance and making the call based on it (or the lack thereof) is setting yourself up for failure. A business is always hiring if your application is good, but never hiring if you leave without one. A woman is always interested if your game…
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 06:17 PM
1

But yeah sure, we can link to Shillarys garbage also. Shes a pile of shit too. But just because she's a pile of shit doesn't mean Trump isn't also. Exactly correct. Just because $hillary is an example of a horrible person doesn't automatically make Trump a paragon. There are an infinite number of wrong answers.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 02:45 PM
3

Drop the scientific bullshit already, it's really starting to delve into "snakehead aliens running the oil business" Shhh! They'll hear you! Never publicly acknowledge the snakehead alien conspiracy!!
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 02:27 PM
2

What do you bring to the table, other than a short list of things a dead cat could do? If I cleaned up and dressed Felix's corpse, he could be "not creepy, dress well, and have good hygiene" too Why would anyone, let alone an HSMV woman, want to be your friend? Don't treat that as rhetorical. Find or make a reason, unless you think the smell of desperation on your breath and the look of frantic neediness in your eyes should be enticing enough. She already has a dozen loser orbiters. If you didn'…
/r/askTRP14/05/17 06:37 PM
3

Not just "a" technique, but the keystone technique. I fully agree with this advice.
/r/askTRP14/05/17 06:30 PM
2

I feel this could be solved simply by holding frame with an abundance mentality. There is no need to argue with her. State your position then hold frame. Let her irrationality beat against you like the tide on a rock. Ignore her, respond only with dismissive, single word statements ("Fine." "Whatever." "Sure." "No.") and she will tire herself out. Arguing with her shows you seek her approval, and gives her the dominant position, which will only make you look more beta than her ex. She'll either …
/r/askTRP14/05/17 06:20 PM
5

Hey now. That paladin is boss!
/r/askTRP13/05/17 02:11 PM
8

Positive results only legitimize the actions that brought those results into being. They do NOT legitimize whatever made-up metaphysical nonsense you propose as the mechanism for why those actions produced positive results. "Laws" presented with no empirical basis are an affront to a logical, rational mental framework. Just because they're old doesn't make them true; show me a study designed to test the veracity of these laws rather than counting on big words and some vague appeal to authority.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/17 03:56 PM
2

In which case, our dear friend is up a bit of a creek, and his options are reduced to one: Prayer.
/r/askTRP12/05/17 11:25 AM
2

Aha! A post with some meat! So many contributions to the manosphere are thoughtful and provocative, but lack any empirical foundation; they turn into someone's personal opinion that they support by linking to other people's personal opinions. Much ethos, but lacking in the logos men like me seek. They smell great, but there's no meat to bite down on. Thank you for providing references to studied psychological methods that I can research and expand upon on my own. I very much appreciate it!
/r/TheRedPill11/05/17 04:17 PM
5

If anything comes back to you, remember: deny, deny, deny. Admit to only what you know is provable (bar, drinks) but nothing else and absolutely not the sex. Do not try to cover yourself in half truths; you should lie like a rug (but be consistent! Remember your lies!). Make up the rest of the evening out if whole cloth. Lies are more believable than sorta-lies, and you can completely control the narrative about yourself. Suggestion: Make her out to be salty over you turning her down.
/r/askTRP11/05/17 03:49 PM
1

Maybe that's why these young girls want older men more and more often? This is not at all a bad thing.
/r/askTRP10/05/17 09:22 PM
7

This is easy. She didn't think to block email? She only thought to block the stuff that is easy for a new beau to stumble into? The scientific term for that is "bullshit". Trickle truth incoming. Fasten up your headbelt.
/r/askTRP10/05/17 09:09 PM
1

Do you relish the idea of submitting itemized invoices for every service you provide? If not, hard next. You might get somewhere by refusing to provide any further value and seeing if she comes around, but why put so much effort into a project? There are so many fish out there that will bite so much more easily.
/r/askTRP10/05/17 09:01 PM
4

Trying to get her to take responsibility is a losing proposition, friend. You will spend many sleepless nights arguing over minutiae​ like the definition of "is". Get yourself taken care of, and drop her like a freshly bathed cat. She's a risky ride you don't need.
/r/askTRP10/05/17 08:49 PM
2

"You know what? That's a great point. Why do I want your number?" Walk away.
/r/askTRP10/05/17 08:43 PM
3

Thank you for the link. I'm not sure you're applying the concept correctly, but your response would best be along the lines of "Figured ya'll [Note: indicate that she is not the sole recipient of said value by using a plural pronoun] could get some use out of it." Simple, short, direct. Then, following the comment you've linked, hold fast on any more value giving and turn your eye to what kind of responses come back over the next few days. If she does not reply in kind in a fairly short time fra…
/r/askTRP08/05/17 07:21 PM
4

The middle-school playground is your best bet. Bring candy. Oh, I'm sorry, that's not what you were expecting? Reality is harsh, friend. By the time they're in legal range, you're either looking at being her ninth, or cracking open a church virgin. The latter might sound more appealing, but is an awful ROI.
/r/askTRP08/05/17 02:25 PM
2

I'm not certain where this "giving out value" concept comes from. I did a quick google search, and a quick reddit search, but didn't come up with anything. Perhaps if you provide a reference link, I can give some better advice?
/r/askTRP08/05/17 02:15 PM
2

I think the brothel idea is wonderful. Take a wad of cash and have sex with as many different girls as you can afford. With authors, the common concept is "You have to write 10,000 bad words before the good words start to come out." In your case, I think applying that to sex is a fine choice. Get your nervousness and your kinks and your awkwardness out on women whom you are paying to be nice to you while you fuck them. In addition, you'll finally get to feel what all the fuss is about, which wil…
/r/askTRP08/05/17 02:09 PM
1

A very good point! I'm perturbed that I didn't think of that myself.
/r/askTRP08/05/17 02:05 PM
5

Nothing wrong with sloppy seconds. We should do everything we can to eliminate "slut shaming" from our society; why dissuade them from doing exactly what we want them to be doing? Ah, but I digress. I am of the camp that views women as ideally a communal resource, and am therefore biased. But many equally valid opinions are held by equally thoughtful men that women should ideally be a private resource, and while I disagree, I tip my hat in their direction all the same. More to the point, OP shou…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/17 02:02 PM
1

Women say things like that for a variety of reasons. Here are two, just off the top of my head: 1- ASD (in this case, not Anti-Slut Defense, but Anti-Shallow Defense). They accuse men of being shallow and image/appearance oriented as a slur, and therefore they cannot admit to being subject to the same biases. You will only rarely get a woman to admit she has any specific physical preferences at all, and never in a public or group setting. For example, this thread in AskWomen where a man asked wh…
/r/askTRP08/05/17 01:56 PM
14

Oh, undoubtedly. But even in the lousiest story one can find a kernel of truth if one digs deep enough. In this case, judging by the seething anger and implication of fantastical high-school-wet-dream sex acts, our OP is actually the lamented "friend". This was his way of seeking advice without letting on that he is, IRL, a simpering weakling. Thus, why I responded as I did.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/17 01:24 PM
12

This is a perfect example of the difference between an Alpha and a beta. Betas constantly whine about how the "sluts" won't have sex with them. This is why. Women don't want to enjoy coitus with betas; why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free? I would bet dimes to doughnuts that as soon as he stops giving her freebies, she'll become much more interested in getting him into the bedroom. The funniest thing is how betas see US as the assholes, when it's the women who have set up the trans…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/17 02:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter