TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ilikecats18851 Archive

View 1 post and 578 comments by ilikecats18851 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Debateilikecats18851/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 02:55 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

"It is not enough to guarantee women treatment that is identical to that of men. Rather, biological as well as socially and culturally constructed differences between men and women must be taken into account. Under certain circumstances, non-identical treatment of women and men will be required in order to address such differences. Pursuit of the goal of substantive equality also calls for an effective strategy aimed at overcoming underrepresentation of women and a redistribution of resources an…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 03:44 AM
–

So, a truism?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 02:30 AM
5

The hysterical and hyperbolic style doesn't help.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/25 06:20 AM
1

Not interested in life advice from a "dialectical materialist"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/25 12:51 AM
1

This might be the stupidest post I've seen on this subreddit in a year. Congrats
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/25 11:46 PM
1

How brave of them to mention the problem. Could they do anything other than 'raise awareness' ? I would be more inclined to believe feminists cared if they helped shoulder the unequal tax burden.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/25 04:47 AM
-2

Address the middle part of his counterargument (you can't). I feel exactly the same. If men are supposed to be so grateful for the privilege of shouldering the tax burden, why can't women aspire to this awesome privilege as well? In fact, this is one male field I would LOVE to see women completely take over!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/25 03:34 AM
3

Yeah there's zero signs and no one can tell at all. All abusers are simply masterminds, sociopathic geniuses with 99th percentile IQs. Or, women don't care and it might even give her the tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/25 04:27 AM
1

False dichotomy. ""independent" single woman vs dependent married woman. In reality, single women are independent so far as there are NGOs dedicated to advancing their wealth, preferential hiring and men keep paying the tax burden.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/25 03:57 AM
–

And then a woman posed another retarded anecdote and thought she did something
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 10:19 PM
–

And then he took cold showers and got bitches and then everyone clapped and then air force 1 landed and obama was there
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 09:05 PM
1

Women don't have to lower their standards for no reason. Women would only have to lower their standards if they also held beliefs like they are less superficial (lol) than men, smarter at choosing partners, and that bad men are hard to spot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 03:48 AM
14

If a male account posted this, there would be 10 women under the post twisting themselves into pretzels to prove otherwise. Thanks for posting the truth
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 03:32 AM
1

That sounds like a truism.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/25 02:05 AM
1

I did mention I forgot. Sorry. What else can I do? As mentioned, I still don't think transexuals being weird helps your case, so if I had remembered, I would have brought it up. It just slipped my mind
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/25 05:41 AM
1

Well hey I do agree there can be issue with transsexual murderers like Ed Gein and there is a pattern with their mothers abusing them, dressing them in womens clothes etc like you described. I just don't think that it's a very widespread phenonema given even I forgot about that, and I was watching a video on it not a week ago. Aside from that and maybe Munchausen stuff, (which imo is not common either) I can't think of anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 03:06 AM
16

Engage with why his post is wrong and give an example of what you really believe, instead of constructing a whataboutism that does not exist in reality. (I have never in my life heard a man's behaviour be analyzed as resulting from his mum)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/25 12:08 AM
–

women think gym changes your facial genetics so bleak it's almost funny hahaha I'm ending it
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:49 AM
1

Yeah, some guys are liked by women inherently, and others get to show their worth by paying women to fake the same level of desire towards them! Everyone wins in the end and we're all happy forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/25 09:19 AM
–

I don't even care about your happiness, what you take from men on average with hatred no less is enough to make me think twice about suffrage. Not to mention the immigrants you bring in.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:38 AM
–

It's so awesome! All it took was a complete overhaul of the private sector to include makework jobs, expansion of the government to increase the amount of makework jobs there, tax burdens on top of that from men on net to women. And after all that, women hold the vast majority of consumer debt! What's not to like?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:24 AM
–

They won't actually, because all the normal disincentives for sleeping with assholes have been removed. When he leaves her, she takes money from the tax pool that other men pay into against their will to fundraise her lifestyle and/or kids without the man she slept with.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 06:07 AM
3

lmfao thats awesome im saving that
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 05:59 AM
1

We are given free will to work past our human nature. What about our fallen state is supposed to disprove the existence of God?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/25 05:52 AM
–

Thanks for the honesty, you are literally 1 in a 100.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/25 03:55 AM
1

An easy fix for this is to decouple men from the state and let women decide how they want to relate to men. If women want to receive money from men, they can do things men want in return. If they don't want to do that, they can get a job. It literally cannot go wrong because it lets everyone decide what to do, unless of course you consider men funding women on aggregate through the government as proxy a fundamental human right.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/25 07:50 AM
1

I like the way that you implied voting democrat in women is a direct result of intelligence. It was really subtle and a good jab
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 08:32 AM
2

liberal women and conservative largely have similar beliefs and desires but express them differently in different frames. But behind the frames, they are the same
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/25 05:06 AM
4

lmfao thats so good something about "misogynistic" spaces just leads to the best most incredible memes
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/25 06:21 AM
8

So we're back to square one, a square men argue from. You have to then go on to refute the gender disparity.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 07:40 AM
-2

women could grow balls and contribute to the labour market without a massive tax disparity funding their entire fake corpo lifestyles but hell will freeze over before that happens. just have some grace when it comes to male loneliness please :)
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/25 06:31 AM
1

rates of child abuse, chances of the relationship breaking down again, nothing about step families is better than actual families.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/25 08:06 AM
–

Actually, suicide would be a better option.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 07:51 AM
2

Yeah mate you figured it out it's all an elaborate psyop. Congratulations
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 04:51 AM
14

holy shit that is broooootal great suicifuel lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 02:29 AM
8

The tax burden that men (as a collective, yes ladies, we are going to talk about group averges) in all industrialized western countries contribute to disproportionately whether they want to or not is probably enough. But if you mean what a practical contribution would look like, there is probably nothing. Spengler talks about civilizational cycles - birth, coming of age, and death. If the death were avoidable, civilizations would last forever. But they don't. If you think the answer is to raise …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 01:17 AM
1

I'm worried trump won't go far enough. Some people estimate 50 million illegals. But that is besides the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/25 12:14 AM
1

So real. They can never confront this honestly as it destroys them. "But we have proof men oppressed women as a collective for thousands of years across cultures" the proof: "dr soystein has calculated what the world would look like if men and women were equal, calculated the difference between this hypothetical and reality, and reported the difference as ironclad proof presupposing the hypothetical" and then a billion science trusters clap up and down in glee
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 09:52 PM
-1

The idea that you being outside of the us makes your political take any less subjective is the dishonest part. Guess what, I'm outside the us too, and I don't think what they are doing is "shooting themselves in the foot" well, now two people who are both outside of the us have opposing views, so we are back to square one.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 09:50 PM
1

I like how you phrased it "from the outside" to try and pass off the no bias, reality-is-left-leaning meme. Just be honest!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 12:40 PM
–

So real. They can never confront this honestly as it destroys them. "But we have proof men oppressed women as a collective for thousands of years across cultures" the proof: "dr soystein has calculated what the world would look like if men and women were equal, calculated the difference between this hypothetical and reality, and reported the difference as ironclad proof presupposing the hypothetical" and then a billion science trusters clap up and down in glee
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/25 12:34 PM
1

I'm arguing dates are objectively terrible now compared to any other time because of massive distortions in reasonable expectations for men vs women, stemming from government abstracting away the value men provide to women behind taxes. You are arguing (to my knowledge) that the solution is not any kind of meaningful change, but for men to change their perception of what is occurring? "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/25 04:33 AM
1

You think men want dates to suck shit for them? You think they just didn't realize dating could be amazing if they did I don't know what? It's a job interview because women can afford it and the sexual market or whatever you call it is one sided.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/25 06:47 AM
-1

Dudes here understand dating and sex are supposed to be fun, right? That means fuckall and your passive aggressive sniping gives away you are retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 09:07 AM
-1

The way you present this so confidently is hilarious. Literally either of those would be amazing, considering we have neither atm.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:51 AM
0

You're (hopefully deliberately, for your intelligence sake) mistaking analogy of your terrible analysis with the mechanism of how the red pill works. No, I did not intend to analyse the red pill as a private security business, that is completely unrelated. I am making an analogy to demonstrate your lack of understanding of cause and effect. For example, your statement assumes the red pill, a framework of understanding (why you assume this, again no idea) should have increased the amount of men d…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 08:04 AM
2

>If red pill works so well for men why does the percentage of men dating go down every year red pill becomes more prominent? Shouldn't it have saved you all by now? If the private security business works so well for people in a collapsing society, then why does the private security business increase every year a society collapses? Shouldn't it have saved the society by now?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/25 05:04 AM
1

The implication being?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/25 05:26 AM
1

Bullshit. You just mention that out of nowhere? You are implying because you see latino men doing all the jobs, implication being this means latino men are somehow responsible for keeping social services etc afloat through tax via their hard work (they arent, in fact they are net consumers of tax on average)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 03:34 AM
–

Probably because they work under the table and the contractors know they can work them harder. You are arguing for slave labour progressively lmfao get real
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/25 01:04 AM
–

Literally, yes. They work longer hours at harder jobs. The gender pay gap is absolute cope.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 10:34 PM
0

The provable discrimination that occurs against white men in corporations proves otherwise. As for government, men in particular are tax slaves.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/25 07:31 AM
2

The redpill in a way is mental health advice. When a guy is going through a shit time, and goes to neoliberal therapy woman with a degree in therapy, what can she say? When she tells the guy that he has a negative view of the world, and he starts to doubt his conviction and wonder if he's crazy, I think that is more negative than just being honest and saying: Yes. You do have it uniquely bad, government does not have any use for you, corporations do not have any use for you, no one cares about y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/25 06:03 AM
13

For god's sake..... you used a fricking study that doesn't align with all my biases.... can't you hecking see that you aren't being a decent human being????
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/25 08:43 AM
1

Not hot enough, then. He's good looking in the same way my parents think I'm good looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 05:49 AM
1

Wealth redistribution, no borders, nanny state, societal suicide.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 05:48 AM
1

Bad wording on my part. I am already independent and mastering skills since it is the only redeeming part of being a normal guy. Everything else is shit
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/25 05:44 AM
1

The way I used my above room temperature IQ to observe reality, see autistic guys, and come to this conclusion by intuition with zero knowledge of the reasons you outlined. u/Sad_and_grossed_out is just not that bright.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:56 AM
1

For the purposes of this post, I'm assuming you mean high functioning autism like mild Asperger's that is functionally just "being quirky" in the same way ADHD is just "being male". Sucks that autistic guys aren't as smart as you to come to the conclusion that they are wrong and you are right. If only they could humble themselves to listen to Sad_and_grossed_out and realise if they just socialized better and were hecking nice people they would have success. Or, they are just more bold in their t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:52 AM
1

Your solution is being a decent hecking human being? What a piercing intellect.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:50 AM
8

No, being ugly and unmasculine is the biggest barrier to dating, and autistic guys are more likely to be ugly and unmasculine. Thought experiment: Imagine a 6'2 guy, chiseled etc, but he has Asperger's. Think dating is hard for him?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:49 AM
2

average betabuxx """relationship""" be like LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:34 AM
-1

It would be pretty cool honestly if women still had to uphold theirs. As it is, I guess the idea of mastering something and being as independent as a human can or should be is cool, which is generally male only. So in spite of the shit situation zoomer men were born into I have hope since it can only get better
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/25 05:33 AM
0

You aggressively failing to understand a post isn't my problem. You can address it like a man or give up, up to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/25 05:09 AM
1

Great counterargument! Normally, passive aggressive sarcasm and deflection is reserved for women. Your female is showing :DDDD
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 02:02 AM
1

I was referring to your reflexive need to defend any bad female behavior in aggregate. You started with the conclusion "women fine" and worked your way backwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 07:37 AM
1

Very simple! It is any cushy job for a woman that is directly or indirectly dependent on taxation, which men pay into more by necessity of having more productive jobs, working longer hours etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 06:12 AM
1

Hoe math describes this perfectly. Men work longer hours at physically or mentally tougher jobs, make more money - "government help!" from women. Women now make equal money (artificially) to men. "where are all the men who make more money than me?"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 09:45 AM
2

intersexual competition, same way men should berate other men for being a simp. it benefits women as a whole if they police themselves so that no one woman is too nice to men
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 07:12 AM
1

Nick fuentes: "no egirls. never. not even once"
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:48 AM
1

I couldn't in my wildest evil incel dreams hate women as much as women hate pretty women.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:48 AM
1

is that limmy also real lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:44 AM
2

We want either proof (proof) we are wrong or just to be told the truth. Of course lies are unsatisfactory? But yes, I was doing the libtard meme of "considering all viewpoints equally" and found everything very different to mine lacking.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:43 AM
1

yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:42 AM
1

A lot of men think making money. Ain't that damn true, sista.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:36 AM
1

You expect anyone to believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 06:02 AM
–

Complete lack of theory of mind. You, as a woman, cannot comprehend that men look to society to determine their self worth, because men understand that value is determined by others. Society of course does not value (most) men, so (most) men accurately believe they are not valued, because they are not. Very simple. Women instead start inwards and project outwards. If society does not reflect their innate worth, society must be wrong. You have applied women's methodology to men and assumed that t…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 05:37 AM
–

Not exactly a whitepill. Wealth will just be endlessly siphoned away from men to women and minorities until society collapses. And keep in mind, South Africa hasn't "collapsed" yet.... it's a long way down.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 05:30 AM
–

most men aren’t dirt poor. human relationships are way more egalitarian than money. tell that to michel houellebecq
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/25 05:24 AM
–

bro really fell for scientism in 2025
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/25 04:17 AM
1

um sweaty this is an incel conspiracy theory
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 09:16 AM
1

auuummmmmmmm i am nothing aummmmmmmm we are all the same aummmmmmmm i am le universe experiencing itself auuuuuuummmmmmm
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/25 07:07 AM
1

Meditation is gay try prayer instead
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/25 04:36 AM
21

The worst part is the constant just world fallacy towards men. You must be mean, or even just evil. Just straight up evil. Never mind the hybristophilia
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/25 09:52 AM
–

What did we do before we had the welfare state? Were birth rates higher or lower? There is your answer. Women want men that have *more* status than them, but then simultaneously demand the govt kneecap them only to get mad again when they can't find men above their level.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/25 05:39 AM
1

Do you think men shouldering the tax burden is ok because a minority of men rape women?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/25 06:14 PM
1

You think that justifies it?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/25 03:15 AM
1

I'm not even for letting all men vote. No reason we can't stop at repealing the 19th. There is really no inherent virtue towards enfranchising everyone. "But what if the lower class interests aren't represented!!!!" they have never been, not now, not ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/25 02:21 AM
1

Is english your first language?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 04:10 PM
1

Why enquire my opinion then, if you are above voting, o enlightened one? You wanted to know how I felt about something you think is pointless? I'm confused atp
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:54 PM
4

They are, actually. Look up net tax paid by gender. The fact I brought up single women and you replied with "men who watch netflix" as the equivalent in social harm is hilarious. "overwhelmed millennial female woman" Let me know if "adulting" and being a decent hecking human being gets too hard. It will be ok in the end.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:52 PM
1

That's it? Seriously? We're all just dumb retards and there's no point to it? Except it has to be fair. That's always the catch. We are just hairless apes on a spinning rock in space, but don't you dare be racist/sexist/etc
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:18 PM
1

I'm being very straightforward and you are sniping at me immediately off the rip. Like a woman, or a man who likes other men. When you say men's voting is good sarcastically, implying that because we haven't banded together to create a utopia on earth, and because of that, there is no point even trying... What does that say about your own argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:53 PM
0

The consequences of women voting are not good.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 02:38 PM
-1

Not a woman, but as a man I'm happy to chime in on how I feel when women state they are entitled as a group to male economic contributions in the abstract. It makes me feel sad and angry that I am treated as expendable tax slave #817223.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:08 AM
-1

Me
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:06 AM
2

I'm sure since you're such a fan of spartan history you will be knowledgeable of what happened when women accrued political power.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:05 AM
1

women carry the burdain of raising kids, risking their bodies and putting on hold their careers, voluntarily, now. and the vast majority choose not to do so, whilst feeling no shame, for better or for worse. you don't get to have your cake and eat it too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:05 AM
1

I see, you were talking about voting specifically which is NOT under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES to be generalised to political power. I will stop doing this immediately!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 09:02 AM
7

Now do net tax paid on average. We aren't talking about the tail distribution here.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:45 AM
1

I can and I do and I will continue to do so. :D
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:22 AM
4

So that's a no.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/25 03:21 AM
3

Can you name one negative behaviour that is overwhelmingly done by women?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 04:39 AM
4

Murphy Macken is a gay hack who got owned by hoemath and others. Women like men who make more money THAN THEM. You do not have to be in the top 1% of incomes. The only reason right now women are pickier is because they have voted to take wealth from men because they want equality. In a world where this did not happen, the extra productivity you would generate as a blue collar worker compared to a woman would maybe be enough to offset her pickiness.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/25 03:42 AM
2

Do you mean women don’t want to fuck guys they feel badly for? Cuz that’s broadly true precisely, we agree
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/25 09:57 AM
–

I'm jealous of women's ability to tell the 80% of men who get nothing how hard it is to "wade through all the guys" on tinder. Please, tell me more. My heart aches for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 10:12 AM
2

The same mechanism in their brain that gives them empathy and makes them say "poor kid" doesn't work for sexual desire, because if it did that would be weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 09:31 AM
11

I'm fine with society being transactional. I'm fine with women having a conditional love, because I understand why a true unconditional love would be disastrous. I'm not ok with western society discarding all traditions for women but making men hold up their end of the bargain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 01:33 AM
1

When women say "no man" they really mean the government. You are competing with the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:43 AM
15

"You aren’t low value….you carry so much empathy in your heart" incredibly female POV. not that it's "wrong" this just does not work for a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:37 AM
1

Men are better able to accept when other men are better than them objectively. Women find this hard to understand because they are incapable of forming a stable group
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 12:11 AM
1

Men being leagues better at generating real wealth is also not a "womens issue" Yet we still try to allocate wealth evenly between genders at men's expense. If men are expected to compete under ruthless social darwinism, fine. But keep that same energy for women
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/25 01:46 AM
1

the bailey: "Hate men? What, that's crazy! We just want equal rights" <-many decades ago the motte: "Men are lazy and useless (lol) and once women become free from the patriarchy marriage will end and women will dominate men in the workplace" <- the logical conclusion of feminism just insane
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 08:31 AM
1

that must have been so harrowing. im so sorry you had to live through that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/25 02:53 AM
7

EQ is a participation trophy dumb people give to themselves to cope. I'm not even saying being low IQ is something to be ashamed of, obviously no one chooses to be low IQ, but then they have to come up with this?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/25 03:01 AM
1

that alone is insane. there are some historical algorithms that try and track the average age of marriage, and use that to predict revolutions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 07:46 AM
1

the vast majority of men? of men as a totality? that isn't true. https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/21/11/2047/1147770/Genetic-Evidence-for-Unequal-Effective-Population the vast majority of men today, ranging from boomers to zoomers in the anglosphere? debatable, but possible (if you think a majority of 51% is some kind of own) the vast majority of young men? seriously? even among people with severe mental illnesses, e.g schizophrenia, bpd, depression, autism, there is massive fertility gap be…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/25 07:41 AM
1

The men women have ""relationships"" with are a small minority anyway, and women subconsciously know they can attack any man complaining about the dating market as an incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/25 05:14 AM
–

Agreed, but a slightly stronger argument imo (I've argued this in comments and in one post) is that women are not entitled to male tax subsidies. This is a very hard concept for some of them to grasp and causes cognitive dissonance.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/25 06:50 AM
1

Fascinating
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 03:31 AM
1

Are you a socialist?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 11:03 PM
1

That last paragraph is insane. Voting for something doesn't make it morally OK and that shiuld be obvious. Equally ridiculous is "women pay tax" yes, in a vacuum, that is true, all working women do pay tax to the government. That isn't relevant. What is relevant is that women as a group pay less in tax to the government than men as a group, and receive more. That is a wealth transfer. The USAID fraud being exposed especially should make you think twice about trying this argument that men and wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 08:25 PM
2

Can you describe the hellish reality for me, out of interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/25 05:09 AM
1

What do you mean socialized to swipe restrictively?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 06:06 PM
1

Bit melodramatic. Stop watching TV and go outside.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 05:53 PM
1

Good for you
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:32 AM
1

lol its not that deep
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:16 AM
1

Funny how I've never met any of these men in real life. Most men in western countries are expected to earn more than the women and also do the 50/50 on childcare bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:16 AM
–

lmao at the "well travelled women" having interesting and difficult hobbies. Most are just looking to eat food, get fucked by a stranger, and see sights. Because woman A does not exist, I'll go with woman B.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:13 AM
–

I would agree that they might be arguing in good faith if they accepted economic slavery as a "logical conclusion" to forced wealth transfers from men to women through taxation and divorce. For what it's worth, the vast majority of men don't want sex slaves. Crazy, I know. We would just like women to make up their minds if they are liberated girlbosses who don't need said wealth transfer, or tradcons for which this inequality is consistent with their worldview.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:07 AM
1

God, why do men NEED to be happy? Why can't they just be satisfied living in the pod, eating the bugs and keeping society working so women can hook up with chad? They're so ungrateful smh
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 10:04 AM
1

Funny how you act like we didn't know you were lying the entire time. Yeah, thanks for admitting you do have it better, better romantic options and the welfare state behind you. The only time we get honesty is after winning arguments and get you to resort to "so what we are wrong and lying, we have it better and we deserve it because you are evil"
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 09:45 AM
–

Weird how taking into account a minority of violent men (I don't personally believe this is an issue, you are just using it for an easy win, but in this case I'll humor you) is acceptable and smart, and oooh we need to take this very seriously, but a man saying something like "Some women are whores and gold diggers" is shouted down as bigoted and irrational, even while women will admit a small % of women fit this criteria. Why do you think this is?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 09:27 AM
–

You think this is some kind of own, exposing hypocrisy. This is exactly what men have been saying. Money is a need, as is sex. Yes, you are an incredible genius, but unfortunately women have already entitled themselves to it through taxation, voting in larger government and supporting social programs, alimony, % who back student loans compared to men, etc etc. There is no such equivalent for men and sex. "The state finds it much easier to cater to the needs of women than the needs of men" - some…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/25 09:03 AM
1

I know, drumpf is literally hitler, etc etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/25 07:45 AM
3

what happened to le danny devito nice guy strawman? the way women debate on this subreddit works like this. man makes a post claiming that looks are all that matter (mostly true) and women flock to the comments talking about how they know a short ugly guy who pulls heaps. men then make a post claiming women are lying about this (also true) and then suddenly looks were always important and you just failed to read the room and also you're dumb.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 04:55 AM
5

Save that same energy for when numerous women on this subreddit deny this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 03:49 AM
3

"Its common sense" and if a man were to say the same common sense thing he'd get labeled as incel.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 03:10 AM
2

and omitting that you are attracted to kindness etc ONLY AFTER a guy meets the looks threshold is just an oopsie? get real
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 01:43 AM
7

Really? I find that hard to believe. I can think of so many improvements that don't involve legalizing rape. Do you think it's the case that your side is pro logic and science, and the other side are just women hating neo nazis who want to bring back slavery? I think that is a childish way to view politics.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/25 01:08 AM
1

The post is incoherent and I don't agree with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/25 12:04 AM
2

We knew this all along. You thought we would be surprised?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/25 11:03 PM
5

Society has been collapsing for 6 centuries?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 02:20 AM
1

"carnal attraction is more than looks" Etymology From Middle English, from Latin carnālis (“fleshly, of the flesh”), from carō (“flesh”).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/25 12:07 AM
–

Oh come on. Would you say 1950s America was feminist because FGM and stoning didn't exist? You are a snake
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:45 PM
2

the female experience must be amazing.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:34 PM
3

Then the question just becomes "do you want old dating norms" which for the 80% of unattractive men is an obvious yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:07 PM
0

OP thinks she's smart because she managed to imply before feminism women in ALL cultures were stoned for showing skin and had FGM. Ridiculous. How do people fall for this? "b-b-b-b-but it happens in india" We're talking about the west. Pay gap has been disproven. Women when given equal access to education do not choose trades or engineering at the same rate as men no matter how many tax dollars are given to them as incentives. Women are not penalized in pay solely because of their sex. IF they a…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:06 PM
2

I like how you assume it's easy for men to get sex, because if you don't your entire belief system collapses.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 11:00 PM
1

lmao, how about you answer his points first?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 06:58 AM
0

i think it actually turns them off. the counterpoint is that they will be ok with chad but honestly even in a monogamous relationship with chad could they even stick it out once the tingles wear off?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:09 AM
0

they are unreasonable only if a woman holds the current popular views on how dating should work. i.e liberal woman thinks men are evil and deserves some kind of reparations and self flagellation from the man, and conservative woman thinks she automatically deserves a trad man who will self sacrifice for her without anything in return. conservative woman is likely what practical control is
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:08 AM
-5

kind of like how everything is the fault of the patriarchy!
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:02 AM
0

haha yeah dude bro power for the win! epic masculinity vibes! meanwhile women band together and protect each other very successfully. but have fun hustling paying tax to fund feminism and wondering why nothing gets better ever
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/25 03:01 AM
0

https://ifunny.co/picture/but-how-does-this-affect-you-personally-S6XjrAyrB
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:41 PM
5

And I am what?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 10:08 PM
8

There are many ways I benefit from women choosing better partners. Less tax and less crime are a few.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/25 09:35 PM
1

Condescending bitch talk from a high school chemistry teacher doesn't sway me. https://imgur.com/a/XCq7cEr Also, credentialism as an argument died with covid.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:58 AM
1

That 142 IQ working wonders
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:41 AM
1

Knew you were an uppity bitch. You have a husband? Don't think so but I'll pray for him just in case
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:28 AM
1

🤣 yeah I'm alone because I'm incapable of diagnosing societal issues, unlike feminists who have an amazing track record. https://looksmax.org/threads/pedo-chad-tinder-experiment.682900/
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:28 AM
1

Fair point. I think that's about it, call it here?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:24 AM
1

Why yes I do think socialized medicine is bullshit, how could you tell?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:21 AM
1

Nursing I have already agreed with. Teaching I'm 50/50 on. The iceland strike refers to in 2023 when a significant percentage of women didn't show up to their jobs for a day and nothing happened. Do you think the same could be accomplished for the male workforce?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:15 AM
1

Lmao, misrepresenting my argument AGAIN and dodging the feminist strike AGAIN. If you cared to be honest you would realize I gave respect to nurses and implied it was not an easy job. Literally any private sector job far away from government funding with mostly male employment is by definition more productive than the jobs I am describing.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:09 AM
1

Can't help but notice you've dodged my point about the iceland womens strike again. Frankly, teachers are babysitters and score incredibly low in IQ and general ability compared to other fields. Clerical staff? Don't make me laugh.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/24 12:04 AM
1

A lot of the assisting jobs in medicine are piss easy aside from nursing which takes guts. Men do not go into support roles in medicine because they don't have time to study at uni for years due to the medical field being massively overregulated and insular.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 11:59 PM
1

Wowee. Where do you teach chemistry? But I won't let you distract me. What do you think about the feminist strike?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 11:57 PM
0

Nah I produce real products that people buy. Interesting you chose "corporate law" to compare to teaching and nursing. How about construction worker compared to sociologist? Or engineer compared to secretary?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 11:55 PM
2

I agree it is a vice of mine and not at all beneficial for me
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:37 PM
2

Great! I'm sure next time a woman expresses any dissatisfaction with modern culture or faces any hardship you'll be there to tell her to pull herself up by the bootstraps.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:29 PM
1

Not only is this true, since women are the gatekeepers of sex (which men see as a reward, whether women intend it that way or not) any bad incentive structure for men can only be womens fault. Caveat: you have to be top 20-5% as a man. Being a lying manipulative ugly man gets you nowhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:19 PM
1

Ever heard of "bullshit jobs" ? Most jobs men do on average are more critical and make more money, resulting in men being net taxpayers. Also refer to a feminist strike in iceland or Norway where a massive % of the female workforce were absent from their jobs and nothing happened. Do you think the same percentage of men could also strike like that without disrupting the economy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 10:01 PM
1

That is who we are subsidizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 07:14 PM
1

It's interesting how fast I managed to make you go down this pointless rabbit hole.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 09:44 AM
1

Ah. There is no progressive movement. There are no large chunks of people who hold similar views. Conservation ends here I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 09:39 AM
0

That's what they've told me? That the core values of western society are false and wrong and only now in the past 50 years will we reach our potential with feminism and marxism?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 09:31 AM
10

Exactly. It's cowardly, servile behavior that they dared to call "revolutionary"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 07:57 AM
0

https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/items/d0ac5958-13cf-489a-a375-e3ab36c9adff
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 03:58 AM
1

You know what, you could be 7 figure rich I'd still rather not be retarded. Lmk when you want to re engage with all my points. I'll give you a few weeks to come up with something better
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:52 AM
1

??? You're saying if you aren't rich you should accept anyone asking for money from you? In that case you should pay my taxes for me, since I'm clearly dead broke. Dm for bank details.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:50 AM
1

"You aren't dirt poor and you still hate taxes??? Only the poor are allowed to hate taxes!" Why.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:46 AM
1

Hey, never said I struggled with money.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:44 AM
1

Then why are you so mad? You've revealed to me you are a white man who pays a lot of tax in order to discredit my post about... white men paying a lot of tax.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:38 AM
1

You're mad about being Indian? Is this anger because of the discourse about H1B's on x right now?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:29 AM
0

Nothing by itself is a white man tax. Just men tend to pay most of the tax. You seem quite mad even though you agree with me?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:26 AM
1

Some wishful guys, maybe. It's certainly true that self improvement doesn't hurt anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:26 AM
0

Great! Don't know how you as a man getting taxed a lot disproves the point I made though
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:17 AM
-2

Yeah, because we're forced to support them through taxation. If they are really so equal they should be able to support themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:14 AM
-2

I thought western countries were filled with evil patriarchal misogynist white men anyway? How is that an improvement?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 02:01 AM
-6

Good question! You don't have to be good because the 80% of men you openly despise are forced at gunpoint through the government to subsidize your terrible choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:55 AM
-3

You act all sarcastic, but it has to be noted every time women get "rights" (privileges) in societies everything goes to shit. So no, you don't have to be moral at all. You have a few more decades of cultural capital accrued by your ancestors to waste, and then the country you live in wil just quietly go to shit. You can keep bitching about how women will totally have kids if they just got husbands who did chores and had massive tax incentives paid for by single men.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:54 AM
2

Red pill is accepting women can't and don't need to self improve because they are born with privilege. Yes, it would be nice if they did, but at this time in western society the ship has sailed.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 01:45 AM
3

The majority of wars are started by men because the majority of leaders are men..... this is an infantile view of history
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 12:23 AM
7

You might not care about politics, but politics cares about you. It's not that men or women are worse (although it is funny every single religion places men above women) its just that left to their own devices, women tend to destroy societies. I quite like living in a high trust society.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 12:11 AM
9

In a vacuum, nothing is a monolith. Compared to men, women are more of a monolith than men. Hope this helps!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/24 12:03 AM
15

"Just be happy single!" I would, if women didn't try so hard to fuck with single men and demoralize them. Women hate weak men period. They have a ruthless discrimination against a bottom % of men that can't be matched by any "racist" or "homophobe" Want to save money by being single? Guess what buddy, those single mums really need some support. Looks like we'll have to be taxing you! Want to exist in peace? Your race and gender is actually the root of all evil and we need to humiliate you in gam…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 11:48 PM
2

Blue pill perpetuates itself with a kafkatrap. "Women are attracted to morality and men who are useful for society's continuance" (demonstrably false) so if you can't get success? You didn't be nice enough bro. Start nicemaxxing. Bad boy succeeds? He's actually a sweetheart on the inside.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/24 11:45 PM
0

Child brides aren't relevant at all. You are grasping at straws. They happen entirely outside of the western sphere (which everyone refers to for dating) and that we are discussing. I'm done talking.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 08:35 AM
2

That is attaching moral judgements to facts. I would agree that men have higher sex drives than women. Saying men are polygynous is a sneaky way of shifting blame away from men. The tendency towards polygyny at lower cultural levels is a function of women being willing to share a few top men rather than settle with their looks match. If they really didn't like polygyny they wouldn't fuck a man who already has a partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 06:33 AM
3

I guess? What kind of statements about men do you think would involve that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 06:27 AM
2

So you can't make any generalizations at all? Pattern recognition is just for dumb people? What the fuck is that supposed to mean
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 04:30 AM
1

Yes, men (majority of which not being criminals) discriminate towards the outgroup of male criminals. This is why when men vote, society tends to figure out the whole "criminal justice" thing pretty quick, but that is "mean" so now we are stuck with immigrants lighting people on fire in a subway. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 04:22 AM
–

"heh, you want to have sex with a woman? but you also don't want to fuck the town bicycle? checkmate redpillers" you know there is a way for men to have sex with women without having to have sex with whores right? it was called monogamy. unfortunately, women hated their looksmatch so much they would rather extort men of tax dollars and work for a corporation instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 04:19 AM
1

It's insane how quickly they change what they "believe" makes you wonder if they were ever capable of honesty to begin with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 04:02 AM
1

It's amazing how you poured out all those paragraphs just to say we are allowed to hate you and you are evil for realizing.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 03:45 AM
1

Now in this thread watch all the women who give you snark for talking about 80 20 proudly admit average men just don't do it for them and good sex is rare.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/24 01:08 AM
1

"Feminists aren't anti sex or anti children" Whenever the inconsistencies in leftist politics lead you to insane mental gymnastics like this, you should reconsider the ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/24 04:56 AM
1

No, where's your argument? Did I eviscerate it? Let's not get distracted.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 01:15 AM
1

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:42 AM
1

....yes, they did. And? You were arguing with me about how evil I am but now you seem less enthusiastic
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:42 AM
1

The mother and kids don't have to starve. I'm sure people like you can band together and create a charity outside of the government that provides for the needy like western civilizations have done for 100s of years before big government. People like me who are evil and hate fun and puppies however can choose whether or not to donate.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:39 AM
0

I don't believe in emotional blackmail. Women can choose whether or not to have kids and whether to have them with a responsible father or not. To deny this is to deny female agency and deny feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:31 AM
1

"If the fathers don't pay, your tax dollars do" And they shouldn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:24 AM
1

I did answer that in painstaking detail giving my reasons for disagreeing and my own interpretation. Jesus fucking Christ LEARN TO READ
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:11 AM
1

Oh my god. Endless complaints. "Wheres the actual study" "here it is" "why couldn't you just link the study" I've been nothing but accommodating. I explained your last point in the previous paragraph. I'm done.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:07 AM
1

No, the conclusions they reach are worthless. The data isn't. My interpretation of the data is very simple: men contribute more (or are the only contributors!!) therefore men should have responsibility. Yes, I'm just reinterpreting it, but now we're back to square one where you are just disagreeing with me instead of the study. Just engage honestly please.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 12:00 AM
1

Yes, I trust that the data they gathered isn't faked because there is no reason they would fake such awkward data. Economics is not a hard science and you can interpret anything any way you want. If I had posted a paper about chemical synthesis or a mathematical proof and the authors went on to talk about the implications or possible uses of something in the paper, I could expect that to be useful because the conclusions in harder sciences are less arbitrary. Tl:dr Once they are done with the da…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:37 PM
1

No, I'm purely interested in the data of the study.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:27 PM
-2

I'm sure the government funded researchers had to hand wave the implications of a study about government funding, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:25 PM
-1

The study in the anonymous blog post I linked. 😁
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 11:17 PM
0

Isn't it weird whenever white men are openly hated by those in culture, it's just a "culture war distraction" and we are supposed to turn the other cheek and focus on more important things? But whenever white men produce culture, suddenly it's very important and has deep implications for society. Seems a bit convenient to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:42 PM
-2

Do you think games companies should design games to appeal to their core audience or a fringe minority who hates desperately said core audience?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:35 PM
0

My bad, I could have sworn there was a legal privilege n the private sector but I guess I confused it. How do you prove if discrimination happened? Edit: would you mind responding to my other point?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:30 PM
-1

Awesome! Incels are cool to hate still, I guess. Got to have a scapegoat. But don't you dare be racist/sexist/homophobic
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:27 PM
-2

I noticed you danced around whether or not the study is right. Do you think it is reflective of reality? Yes or no. If you don't want to support costly government policies you are more likely to be male. I don't think it's a coincidence government got bigger when suffrage happened. Also, if we're discounting studies based on personal experiences, couldn't I then apply all my male lived experience to debunk anything feminist you could show me? How are we to balance studies and anecdotes? Because …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:24 PM
-4

No, society should change and stop hating and demonizing the men that keep things running. Or there can just be endless immigrants and propaganda to replace the natives. https://x.com/ItIsHoeMath/status/1869892024058687747?t=cMtgf3AP824yZryKioweIw&s=19
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:18 PM
-3

If you also didn't take in enough government assistance to offset that, you would have one vote in this hypothetical. I don't know how this system could work but a potential problem with making it proportional is it skewing to an oligarchy with billionaires, but I guess that's most countries anyway. Also, it's irrelevant you are an outlier. You are a cool, quirky, unique outlier who's very empowered I'm sure but we are talking about a trend. https://ifunny.co/picture/the-easiest-and-quickest-way…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:20 PM
-2

End title 9. There is no way to tell if people are being discriminated against if employers aren't dumb, so the legal system works backwards and assumes any difference in employment has to be the result of discrimination. Make it so only net tax payers can vote. If men pay more tax than women so be it, but responsibility should be tied to authority. https://afru.com/its-true-only-men-pay-tax/ I don't know if this would return things to normal, but it would definitely make things better. I like t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:06 PM
–

Depends how attractive he is. If he's ugly, around 16-18 is a bit icky. If he's hot around 40
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 03:30 AM
-2

Yes, congratulations, your one single outlier disproves the wider trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:07 PM
-3

Yes, men gatekept women out of hard work that they themselves would rather not do, then as soon as air conditioning came along women were happy to work. Actually, they were still on the fence, but a bit of propaganda goes a long way. Now the government can tax men and women! Progress!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 11:05 PM
-1

Work for money
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 10:57 PM
0

Imagine "my gender never used to work for money, but now with a tax advantage courtesy of men and government programs and propaganda society sorta is okay with it"
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 06:29 PM
1

Social darwinism for men in dating. Progressive fantasy land for women working. It all makes perfect sense you chud
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 06:22 PM
4

😂 ppd is a trip sometimes ... all the time
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 07:35 AM
18

However, I do agree that there can be too much complaining and commiserating to the point it becomes detrimental. Do you think this would be a well received response to a post about ""women's issues""
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 04:49 AM
1

A lot of these are intentionally misunderstanding the point. Weaselly. When women are told to not be picky, it's understood to be about looks. 80% of women simply cannot have 20% of men. When women are told to pick better, this is understood to mean avoid guys who are obviously criminals and psychopaths. "But not all women" but not all men. Women are expected to not have sex with many different men (I think that is a reasonable expectation given how that works for societies) and yet sex with one…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/24 04:44 AM
–

Men aren't allowed to have issues. Feminism unironicslly believes everything is men's fault so they have to do crazy gymnastics to keep things coherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 07:53 AM
3

Since democracy is a sham, and a race to the bottom, the only way intelligent and moral people can "vote" for better societies/countries is with their feet. Following that logic, fighting for a county is endorsing it. Imo it's amoral to fight for a country that hates you, which immediately rules out any Anglo country if you are a white male.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/12/24 07:46 AM
1

I've been more than charitable to you and I'm done with this thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:31 AM
1

Yes, at the time I posted that, I answered your questions in full, then you posted another question. Do you understand how time works?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:29 AM
1

You called me a dumbass for no reason. So if you marry a non virgin woman are you a beta bux since the other guys didn’t commit to her the way you are? Seeks like I answered this question. 🤷‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:25 AM
1

No, you created a retarded and highly specific hypothetical after I answered all your questions in full.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:20 AM
1

What if I grew wings and flew to the moon
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:18 AM
2

Thanks. Refreshing to talk to someone intellectually honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 06:00 AM
1

Answer it yourself with the definition I provided to you a post ago. If she had a few boyfriends who also had to demonstrate some kind of investment or interest in her but it just didn't work out, probably not. If she demands dinner dates from you then hooks up with Chad on tinder, then yes. Is it that difficult to understand?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:57 AM
2

Yeah, I'm a zoomer. And not bi. Is dating men as easy as it's said to be?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:42 AM
2

Not even too much in person but yes. So how can you see that and still be blue pill? Especially with online dating statistics and the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:37 AM
1

What do you think I've seen?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:24 AM
1

Beta buxx is simple. Any man who has to pay for sexual access to a woman when other men would not have to do the same. Calm down with the seething condescension.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:20 AM
2

Once that domino falls, they have to concede other positions. Like morality not having anything to do with sexual success. Also, shouldn't it be weird they are willing to die on that specific hill? What does it say about a group if they are willing to deny reality that hard?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:17 AM
1

Real
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:14 AM
1

"Insecure" I'm insecure about beta buxxing in the same way I'm insecure about stepping in shit, dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:14 AM
1

Yes, I'd also like women to be consistent with their fake moral standards. "Men, you want women to stop lying, but you also want their behavior to be consistent with their morals? Hypocrite much?" This is not the own you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 05:10 AM
4

Yes, there is no possible way a grown woman could ever be responsible for her own choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/24 12:09 AM
1

They are. My technical school has women only scholarships and still like 5% women in engineering.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:48 AM
1

Yeah that kind of masculinity consumption strikes me as tragic. Black rifle coffee, dude wipes, the whole cigars and whiskey shtick. Hate the retards who fall for it. Not that I'm against smoking and drinking, but doing it specifically to put on a front is gay
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:46 AM
2

This relies on the implication women won't criticize men for doing things they do. Men and women are not equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/24 01:45 AM
1

No shit
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 07:14 PM
1

I have nothing more to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 06:00 PM
3

Patterns don't exist? Generalizations are just useless?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:05 AM
1

So, you'll definitely be saying "choose better men" if a woman complains about men?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 11:00 AM
-2

No, women just don't love in the same way men do, probably for survival reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:58 AM
-2

Love for men is built on compromise. Love for women is getting what they want when they want and if that isn't the case he's controlling and toxic and other therapy talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:53 AM
1

And yet the jail time for petty theft vs rape is different. But stealing and rape are both sins. What could possibly be the reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:31 AM
4

True. I don't fault you for that and it's definitely not inherently virtuous to be negative. Good luck out there man
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:31 AM
1

You seemed to imply it was bad in order to reinforce your false equivalency.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:27 AM
3

Christianity is not blue pill remotely. Have you read the Bible?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:23 AM
1

OK. Is that supposed to be a statement or are you saying that's bad?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:23 AM
4

I agree we need hope. But when I analyzed how dating works, romance doesn't really exist. The only source of hope for me has been religion. How can you have hope for this world? I'm on the fence about it, but it has committed more evil to me than I to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:14 AM
5

You were exposed to a romcom at school once and it seriously impacted your view of dating? I've been incredibly stupid in the past and even I could figure out romcoms were weird.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:12 AM
1

See my reply to the other comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:11 AM
1

And in that situation, what will guys say about whoremongering "i like getting sex and couldn't elsewhere" Whereas for hybristophilia it's this paragraph of bullshit. Hilarious you compared a whore to a serial killer.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:11 AM
2

girls are in meaningless makework government jobs that are funded directly by taxes, or corpo jobs at bloated companies (also funded by cheap credit and government economic policies) but yes, society will not collapse at the drop of a hat. the bigger they are, the harder they fall, and america has years of slowly declining mediocrity left to go. also, keep in mind, the only reason the only reason my country forces me to work more than i would have to in a non-evil economic system is through disp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:08 AM
2

lmfao what
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:04 AM
2

also, chad cant get sex for a year, goes insane and kills someone. cue joker meme
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:04 AM
1

its a nothing burger. women will say "men are so psychotic wow they are all retreating" men will say "wow will this make women not hate us anymore because of market theory" in reality neither of things are true
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:03 AM
7

You think men are the ones watching romcoms? interesting
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 10:02 AM
2

The only female posters I can remember are the infamous bad faith posters like Lilith (more bad faith than the average woman). Is parfait a regular? First time in this megathread
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 09:49 AM
1

You mean humans generally are imperfect? That's so obvious I don't know how that's relevant. ... unless you meant to sneakily imply men and women are equal because we all sin. No, men and women are different and have differences including a preference for psychopaths like I laid out.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 09:47 AM
14

I’m not an incel (at least ideologically, but by definition I am) no one is incel like twox defines it. even not im an actual incel (that hates women for no reason, wants to see people suffer) that is a strawman that doesnt exist. I'm just baffled you could express that you are struggling (and if you are struggling now because of looks its over) and still overall label blue pill. I also don't understand what possible blue pill opinions you can hold given that you know how the life of an average/…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 09:43 AM
4

The difference between male simping for female criminals is that men simp for women DESPITE the crazy. The other important difference is that man don't go into insane rationalisations for why they do this. Just "haha yeah shes so hot i would" Women simp for male criminals because of looks but also because of the psychopathy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 09:37 AM
7

why is your flair blue pill?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 09:35 AM
2

first woman ive seen today not worship the sexy psychopath.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 09:33 AM
1

True! Just learn how to code. It's that simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 07:37 AM
5

You left out a lot of things. First off, any egalitarian or feminist (which I assume you are one of) invalidates all historical relationships because they were patriarchal. Men and women pairing up evenly happened under religious, patriarchal norms so I'm not sure why this is an own. Your second spiel about how average people "like us" had to settle for other average people sneakily implies I somehow believe men are specifically entitled to women above them. I'd appreciate if I didn't have to sp…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 07:12 AM
3

Radicalizing the Romanceless | Slate Star Codex
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 06:52 AM
13

So if what you said were true, we would expect men and women to pair up evenly, right? Except that hasn't happened for all of human history and it hasn't happened now. Are you "just not like the other girls?"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 06:48 AM
4

Bill Burr is cucked now and guys know.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/24 06:47 AM
1

What do you think happens when "incels" are banned from mainstream discussion? Do you think that leads to more "unmoderated incel spaces", or less?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/24 06:09 AM
1

Would you say doubling the labour force might have pushed wages down
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 07:21 AM
-1

Hmm, but you would say feminism is worth giving that up?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/24 06:48 AM
1

Even still, I think the average woman knows she has no shot with chico, so her interest in him isn't based on anything real. Kind of like how women don't only message the top 20% of men. So by your own explanation it's not 80/20 lol Because of all the word games you chose to play, you forgot we were talking about how visual men vs women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:52 PM
1

No, the whole point of 80 20 is that it is the same 20. Yes, not every single woman will find every single 20%er attractive, but is meaningful because that 20% comprises normal masculine qualities that women find attractive. You think women get hot for Danny devito the same way they do Chico lakowski? You think Danny is part of the 20%? The reason women still message guys not apart of the 20% is because maybe 80% of women won't be able to all have the 20% to themselves? Ever consider math?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:29 PM
1

https://np.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/1cSTj6iga2 Generally the top dating apps are consistent with the 80 20, some a bit worse. There are other sources but those I don't have saved and will need to find once I'm off work. Also, I never in this thread wanted to claim women are more visual based than men. Given most progressives like to assume equality, I am merely arguing that women are at least equal, given no evidence to the contrary.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 10:00 PM
2

You really expect me to believe you've never heard of the 80/20 talking point? On fucking purplepilldebate? I'll get the sources, but first I want you to reply telling me exactly that. And then I want an apology when I provide the sources.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 09:44 PM
3

You are immediately nitpicking. You know full well where the 80% comes from, but you want me to provide it anyway. Get screwed
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 09:39 PM
4

Frankly, debating you is going to be exhausting. How about we start with why you believe women to be less visual than men. What then contributes to only 20% of men getting matches on OLD? Is it their emotional intelligence?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 09:19 PM
6

Sorry I didn't realize you were passive aggressive and dumb. My question was asked in good faith. Women are not "less visual" than men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 08:04 PM
5

How does what you said refute what I said? There are some attractive women you personally don't like, and?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 07:54 PM
1

You don't think I'm serious? This is what all normal men think.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 06:29 PM
2

Sarcasm. I'm offended you thought I was serious. I don't believe her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 05:57 PM
-2

Agrees with corporations and the government about the objectively correct political reality, nice tattoos and dyed hair, comfortable in her body, not a pick me, is willing to help me work on my flawed masculinity, doesn't want kids. Also old, older women are just so hecking hot (but in a wholesome and progressive way) Also Also hecking muscular and strong!!! (Not in like a gross evil toxically masculine way though)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 07:10 AM
2

Oh absolutely.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 07:06 AM
41

No, men are also held to a more rigid standard of appearance. Consult the lack of body positivity for men and how women rate 80% of men unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 07:04 AM
-5

he doesn't have to provide for me Because men already provide collectively for women through the state. matches my intelligence Don't know how to respond to this. respects me We respect women so much we let them kill their kids because saying that is immoral hurts their feelings. How much more can a man respect you? emotional equal Let's not do this.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/24 07:03 AM
3

I automatically agreed, but upon thinking about it, I'm not even sure. I do agree that the standards for marriage are likely higher
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 09:33 PM
2

If you are wondering about how average women feel about average men, the average women has no attraction to the average man. The average man is attracted to the average woman. https://np.reddit.com/r/OkCupid/s/f2AXYpRUFe There will be attempts to rationalize this because of the implications that it is not all men's fault for the dating crisis, based on "well, no one should be forced to like someone else" which neatly and insidiously brushes aside the fact we do expect some social engineering tow…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 09:08 PM
4

I think you should post what you linked on ppd. I'd love to see that.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 07:44 PM
6

Good analysis
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 07:36 PM
–

New Zealand. Somehow I doubt that men are getting a boost in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/24 05:25 AM
1

Because the culture around sex has consequences that affect me personally because I am tied to other people's fuckups through the state.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 08:54 AM
-4

My bad, I was incorrect. Chads but also general lowlives who can compensate for their looks by satisfying hybristophilia.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 04:09 AM
-8

It's the absence of a humiliation kink. I actually don't want my taxes going to pay for other men's kids, and would prefer women are just shamed out of casual sex with Chad. But I have a feeling you wouldn't prefer we enforce that legally?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 03:40 AM
1

Fair enough then good stuff. I'm not pro porn either
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:26 AM
2

I don't buy the first part. Do you think women are discriminated against today in western countries?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 11:20 AM
1

women are more likely to blame themselves She says without a shred of irony on purplepilldebate, where women blame men for every societal ill.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 10:48 AM
3

Wow
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:53 AM
7

OK. My reality is a bit different to yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:48 AM
3

Ironically, where men outnumber women monogamy happens. Where women outnumber men hookup culture happens. There are other common sense reasons what you said is dumb but I'll see if I can find the study I'm talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:46 AM
2

But you are OK with feminism, big government, leftist etc? You don't get to pick and choose what you like about a certain culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:45 AM
3

OK, but current culture also says men can't have any expectations for women. This runs into contradictions on your end if you like modernity as a whole, which I'm assuming you do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 09:01 AM
7

Uh, no? This has been well established.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:57 AM
3

insane out of all the societal issues we are expected to care about men watching porn
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:39 AM
4

Interesting criticism but I don't buy it for two reasons. If we accept that women can pick what they want in a partner, and then also that men generally adapt to what woman want, women could simply demand a man who never watches porn. Edit: A better way to say it is in a vacuum your criticism is right but you are assuming a lot of things for that criticism to be true that I disagree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:29 AM
6

allowing women political power was also not normal for most of human history. i think if you applied this "not normal but has been normalized very recently" criticism to your views you would have to change a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:13 AM
3

"men today are taught how to view women through two lenses: porn and feminism. one of these teaches them that women have no worth beyond sex and that they should hate women. the other one is porn" paraphrased from whatifalthist
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 08:05 AM
36

"man i was just about to have sex with a girl i find attractive but meh i dont care i think ill just stick to porn" - 0.01% of men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:19 AM
10

So would you say quitting porn always leads to a noticeable improvement in a man's dating life?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 07:10 AM
13

You unironically think porn keeps men single? This wasn't rhetorical by the way. I need you to admit this before the debate can continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 06:46 AM
23

The majority of young men aren't dating, so I don't know why this is relevant. I don't like porn personally but to be honest it's really not an issue. Most men watch porn because they are single, they aren't single because they watch porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 06:28 AM
1

Funny that I was talking to a lady who called trump a dictator just a day ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:33 AM
2

Could that possibly have something to do with the labour force doubling? Maybe the sexual revolution was not entirely positive?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/24 03:24 AM
6

So you are saying in the past women were expected to marry broke men who gave them nothing? That's a very special and unique take! Speak your truth girl
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 07:27 AM
4

Isn't that a coincidence? I'm here to do something very similar!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 07:25 AM
10

Am I allowed to be frustrated about misandry? Am I allowed to believe misandry is more popular than misogyny? Am I allowed to be angry women vote in a welfare state, take my money, then call me privileged? No matter how nicely I express these things, I will never be allowed to "vent" in the same way women are allowed to think trump is a dictator (after he already served a term)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 07:25 AM
–

You're so close to understanding this! It's reversed since women control the dating market, not men. If attractive i.e not fat women started demanding men to invest in them, men would invest in them, because men are attracted to women much more than women to men. Women don't require this so it doesn't happen, end of.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:32 AM
2

Do you also have the graph of fertility ratios of various mental disorders for men vs women? it absolutely destroys this gay argument made by women but I can't find it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:26 AM
7

B-b-b--but you have no source! no peer review! how could you possibly use common sense to come to a conclusion!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:25 AM
1

That's awesome! What brand of shampoo do you think I should pick to get girls? Should I become a communist or anarchist to get pussy? Thoughts?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:17 AM
0

That is literally how pair bonding works. On the contrary, if women wanted a man who respected her, didn't cheat, and continued to love her, they know exactly where to find them. But somehow, every man is a serial cheater who is also an incel because reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:07 AM
7

Did men ever expect women to do this for free? That's stupid or you are disingenuous
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:05 AM
4

And you're here out of the goodness of your heart? Let's be real
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 05:03 AM
15

"open up about how you feel" "NO NOT LIKE THAT YOU INCEL FREAK ONLY IN WAYS WE DEEM ACCEPTABLE"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:55 AM
0

Also, finding a hookup partner is pretty easy for women - but a kind and committed husband is not. I don't care about the modelish men because they are usually mean and unreliable. Weird, I'm pretty sure every single girl ever has said they don't care about finding a model over a "kind husband" ... and yet
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:54 AM
3

erm well you see patterns you recognise IRL aren't peer reviewed. You aren't allowed to trust your eyes unless a phd says so.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:44 AM
1

Yes, and back in the day healthcare was funded by philanthropists and religious institutions through voluntary donations. Keyword voluntary. This changes the system entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:33 AM
1

If men or anyone else wants something they must pay with time and or money. This is literally my argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:31 AM
1

No, I specifically gave an alternative if you want to be logically consistent, then explained which one I prefer and think is more realistic. If my argument is so bad why do you think you need to misrepresent it?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:29 AM
1

What would you want to discuss?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:27 AM
1

Yeah, I think leeches who don't work if they are able to should actually NOT be allowed to take money from me :) The poor and unfortunate used to be cared for outside of government with mutual aid groups in high trust societies, which is morally ok because those are voluntary. Also, I don't buy that big government taking care of people is somehow a morally righteous position. If I refuse to take care of someone with my own money, and someone else then robs me to take care of that someone, I woul…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/24 04:26 AM
0

At my polytechnic, all the scholarships are for women and minorities. I don't feel very privileged there. What current privileges do men have over women?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:09 PM
0

Man, if only there was some kind of institution where men compensated women and women agreed to raise kids and be sexually exclusive to the man! That sounds like a really good idea
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:05 PM
1

Very reasonable take. I agree. If we have to choose a coherent position, I think no taxes and no coercion to make women pretend to like men rather than the other way. Love Hans - Herman Hoppe!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 11:03 PM
1

When someone works, a part of the money they make through their labour is taken as tax. Then, it is redistributed to other people through public services like roads or social programs. Ergo, the labour of men. If you read my original post I don't think it's too hard to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 07:14 AM
2

Why are women entitled to the labour of men though? To be more broad, why should anyone be entitled to the labour of someone else? Because it would be "mean" not to?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 07:11 AM
-2

What is a human right? Would you define something like Healthcare to be a human right?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 07:09 AM
2

I'm arguing that there is probably a level between "kill all men" and mandating girlfriends through the state. Do you think that we could change the culture to achieve this?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/24 07:06 AM
1

Erm that's not relevant because reasons 🤓☝️
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 09:07 AM
1

Strawman burden of proof fallacy fallacy buzzwords Did I win?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 09:04 AM
-3

Buzzword
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 09:02 AM
-5

You don't think the story about a man and a woman fucking is relevant on the subreddit about the state of men and women fucking? How intellectually honest of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 09:00 AM
1

Statistically, no. Even without evidence the idea that two different types of human with different bodies and minds would contribute the exact same amount of money to society is toddler level thinking. That's not to argue women don't contribute in different ways, but merely pointing out how you would like something to be has no bearing on how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/24 02:00 AM
–

This is the unfortunate truth.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 08:49 PM
–

Stop dodging my point. I don't care about the emotional manipulation.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 08:21 PM
–

https://lozierinstitute.org/fact-sheet-reasons-for-abortion/ Women are just so poor they can't afford contraceptives! Here's an idea, if you are so poor you can't afford to get fucked by someone with a condom, you might have bigger issues. Or, this type of person doesn't exist. "I'm so poor, so don't use a condom"
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 08:10 PM
–

Yep that's right. I hate the poor and disadvantaged and want them to suffer. I also hate fun. I'm evil.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 08:07 PM
–

You know what? Yes. Women having the choice to fuck anyone they want and kill their baby because they didn't feel like contraception or planning is not good. My tax dollars going to single mums when I'm a virgin is a sick joke. Women always point out how unfair it is that men have expectations on female behavior but curiously they never mention what we are expected to put up with in return for nothing, or even being actively hated.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/11/24 07:49 PM
1

Posted in other thread but also here https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10797-024-09834-z#:~:text=Unmarried%20women%20face%20a%20significantly,the%20tax%20system%20is%20progressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:31 PM
1

Does owing back tax mean they don't pay any tax at all or that they pay less tax than required? Also, I'm meaning net impact on the tax system for men vs women. So unless men consume vastly more tax than women, I don't see how that's possible, given that women tend to have more programs available to them. Here's something about the tax contributions, so far I can't find a study on net impact. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10797-024-09834-z#:~:text=Unmarried%20women%20face%20a%20sign…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 09:28 PM
1

How is this relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 08:56 PM
1

And this is supposed to be relevant because?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 08:51 PM
1

You seriously think America would be any different? I want to see you comment that and then I'll look it up.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/24 08:50 PM
–

So women don't like dark triad men, they just prefer them to average men. But they would take a sensitive chad. Wow, that's a very compelling argument!
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 10:58 PM
2

Also, yes, women do not want to be electricians. They have equal legal status to men in every way, and yet there is still a gap in jobs. Could this be that maybe men and women are *gasp* different? As women have more choice in society about which jobs they work, they tend to pick jobs oriented around people like healthcare and teaching. The 'paradox' of working in the world's most equal countries
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 09:48 AM
1

Oh, men can easily be teachers and nurses. They just don't want to. >Everybody is paying taxes... That is disingenuous and insulting to my intelligence. If you cared to understand my post in good faith you would recognise it's not about whether you pay tax, it's about how much tax you pay vs how many benefits you receive. I think you can guess where men and women fall on that, but since you are unable to believe anything unless you feel like it.. Research shows disparity between tax paid by wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 09:42 AM
-1

Nobody is owed male tax dollars either. Two way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 06:08 AM
-3

Women defacto rely on men for survival. See "a world without men" by aaron clarey. The government merely abstracts this transaction between tax. Women, being simple, don't look into it any further. Everything's already built up, and they have plumbing and electricity and cool email jobs in the government to go because they are the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 06:07 AM
-5

In the past, women generally submitted to a man in exchange for resources. Now, the government forces men at gunpoint to pay tax so they can give it to women, so women don't have to deal with average men. I understand the female point of view, I'm sure average men are gross and icky. But there's only so much you can take from men before they dip. The cycle jay is talking about probably involves government overreach and bureaucracy reaching a zenith (because of the female vote) and eventually bec…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/24 06:02 AM
1

Given I don't have negative upvotes, I'd say most people thought I was civil enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/24 05:50 AM
5

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 05:17 AM
1

simple! they should follow the experts! just pay tax to the government and if you deserve a girlfriend you will get one. just whatever you do dont be "mean". mean is one of the worst things you can be today.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 05:17 AM
1

No man with an average iq or above is complaining that he doesn't get to fuck any woman he wants. They are complaining that women don't have to fuck any men or even acknowledge them as sentient humans, whereas men still have to be tone policed and bitched at and fund women indirectly through tax.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/24 12:07 AM
–

Lmao never heard of that link that's awesome. Wish those guys the best
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 11:32 PM
14

So either you gave the previous advice out of utter stupidity, or you intended to gaslight any men dumb enough to take you at your word. Charming.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 09:28 AM
1

Lmao cool humblebrag bro
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 06:52 AM
3

Yeah, women are so awesome and helpful and powerful! They are going to boycott men entirely (which they won't if the man is hot enough) to show them who's boss! Except... they will never boycott male tax dollars being used to prop up said feminism. If women could be independent, maybe this would make sense. But they aren't, and when they claim to be, they hurt society by proxy. Read "a world without men" by aaron clarey to understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/24 06:51 AM
0

Immigrants to New Zealand before the country had a welfare state and plumbing and roads, yeah. Quite different to economic migrants.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 08:12 PM
-2

Mathematically speaking, they import immigrants to vote for them because foreigners and women per Aristotle are easier for tyrants to govern. Edit: although the vote of women was split this election
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/24 07:43 PM
1

Neither do women need male tax dollars. Two way street.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 09:26 AM
6

Thanks I will! Since you clearly care so little, why don't you stop replying first?,
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 07:26 AM
5

You giving up in about a minute was what I was looking for
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 07:22 AM
5

The ultimate argument against the redpill. "It's pointless and vaguely pessimistic in a way I can't describe at all but you have to trust me on this because I said so"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 07:19 AM
4

So the redpill is bad because it's pessimistic in a vague way?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 07:08 AM
6

Alll you said was it produces angry and sad men. Implying it takes men who are fine and turns them into hateful people. I'm asking you HOW it does that, in your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 06:56 AM
4

That's what I genuinely believe to be the case. What do you think happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 06:43 AM
3

Fucked up the formatting, but it's your quote in the midst of it. My bad give me a few secs
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 06:33 AM
10

-ugly, undesirable men receive shit dating advice from weird leftists online -it doesn't work and they notice the reality that is sold to them doesn't add up with what they see irl -they go to the redpill -"the red pill produces sad and angry men!!!"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/24 06:22 AM
1

I know this is just a funny thought experiment but how do you think the men/women only states would differ?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 11:34 PM
1

Get the state out of marriage and end forced wealth transfer from men to women through taxes. If women are as independent as they claim, they would surely have no reason to disagree with this.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 11:32 PM
1

no, not at all. men can go without it. on the other hand, tax dollars from men are an essential need for many groups.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/24 12:46 AM
–

If true love is real, it's not chemical love since that lasts for a year/2 years at best. If it is the practical kind of love men are by definition better at it than women because of the nature of having to give more and be more than their spouse.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 01:55 AM
-1

If they did, they wouldn't ever tell you because women have about 4x the in group bias men do. They 100%judge you on dick size though
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/24 01:50 AM
30

Hilariously bleak, 10/10
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/24 06:21 AM
2

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQOBJqBsrMHLKrNxI9i5g95HcDl-yIx6z5wMyn24UDceixLyixtd6lb_40&s=10
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/24 02:08 AM
1

Well, clearly he is a piece of shit misogynist abusive incel, so he should be suffering anyway. Doesn't he know he needs to be nice?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 10:01 AM
1

You would be correct if you didn't include bs about game. There is no game. There is only not sticking your foot in your mouth, having a nice face and a nice body. So it loops back around to being good advice, just get rich anyway. If women didn't already like you what's the point? Agreed about gold diggers though
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 09:48 AM
1

Be a male feminist, be fit, have money, be stereotypically masculine but don't have any expectations. Just be a fucking nice person you chud, but also don't expect anything to change if you do this, because then you were just in it for the sex, unlike mr chad, who is fuxking girls out of the goodness of his heart. If you get rejected it is always your fault. Also, never give up and keep grinding.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:40 AM
1

Oh hell nah not that survey with millions of data points on online dating which is incredibly popular among young people 😭😭😭😭🤯🤯🤯😳😳😳😳🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:35 AM
1

You don't see the irony given you just argued precisely that? Are you a single mum yourself? Do you have friends who are single mums? Sorry if I struck a nerve
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:34 AM
1

Yeah, agreed. I shouldn't have tried to argue that men are never bad people or capable of moral fault. Thanks for educating me on that
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:32 AM
1

My bad b, should have realized woman just can't be responsible. Unfair to want that from them, I agree. Sry
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 05:27 AM
1

Sarcasm and condescension requires you be better or more intelligent. So, when you take that out of context and don't include "but not single mums" anyone with eyes understands that it's a smear. What, I'm pro deadbeat dad? Try honesty sometime.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/24 02:50 AM
1

The fact that I think a woman has any responsibility, that she could just choose to close her legs, means men have zero fault? Must be nice to know I'm secretly retarded and you can read my mind to find these contradictions I've never stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 09:10 PM
1

The rational gender who doesn't let a deadbeat hit it raw? Yeah prolly
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:59 PM
1

We weren't talking about that and I never argued in this thread men as a whole are more important. I'm saying we already socially shame and legally penalize deadbeats. We don't do the same for single mothers. I've pointed out that male taxpayers share a larger burden than women who get payed by those tax payers if they choose to fuck a deadbeat. I value women. I don't value single mums (excluding widows)
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:57 PM
1

"All taxpayers" sneakily implying women contribute anywhere as much as men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:49 PM
1

Because the male taxpayer is actively taking care of the single mum who chose to fuck a deadbeat. Duh dumbass.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:46 PM
1

Upset I have a life outside of reddit? Just answer the question
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:45 PM
1

Yes, you dumbass, you've circled around to my previous point. So, both are equal, but only one is acknowledged as responsible. So it's unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:14 PM
1

Yeah but it's really convenient for me if I don't have to deal with your previous argument whatever it was. I assume you do believe in it though?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:13 PM
1

If you assume both genders are perfectly equal, then sure, tax men all you want. All I'm saying is men are proven to work more essential jobs, harder and for longer. Men and women want different things. It's quite convenient women can abstract having a husband and turn the government into one. Again, no problem with women being independent and having careers, IF THEY ARE ACTUALLY INDEPENDENT. So either contribute to taxes more as a group, or stop whining.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/24 08:12 PM
2

you must have secretly been going to therapy and working on your incel personality. otherwise how would women be attracted to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:03 AM
2

Because women like it and it's run by females
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:02 AM
1

good scapegoat for women to blame men for. "actually, your problems are because society doesn't cater to women ENOUGH"
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/24 12:02 AM
–

not validating a large group of people (yes, men are validated through sex, if you are angry, take it up with god) and then acting as if all of them are responsible for you, bitching about them being racist/misogynist/evil/patriarchs etc, taking tax dollars from them, I'd say thats pretty disposable. Don't fuck us, fine. Just leave us alone and let us keep our money for fucks sake.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:26 PM
–

Nothing. No redpiller of normal intelligence is angry at women for being women. We're angry the worst of female nature is encouraged, and they get to live out their hypergamy, while we have to fund them through tax dollars. All the while they bitch about the patriarchy and the fake wage gap. I would complain less about female nature if I could just be left alone without women fucking everything up politically.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:22 PM
1

Was the single mother responsible when she let a guy rawdog her who isn't going to raise the kid? If you believe she had no idea what his character would be, I think you're lying. Women can filter out autists and nerds extremely well, why can't they filter out deadbeats? inb4 le mastermind manipulator
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:19 PM
1

Nah I just find it hard to believe you're a maths teacher assuming you believe in the wage gap
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/24 10:17 PM
1

Yes. A child isn't a woman's responsibility. A child is the responsibility of both parents. That's what I'm saying. You agree with me. Now, the reason I bring this up is because if both parents being functional is important, why is it only ok for mainstream media to shit on deadbeat dads? When is the last time you have heard a piece about single mothers?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:42 PM
1

Do you think I am pro deadbeat dads? Now answer my question
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:37 PM
1

If commitment is so important to women, maybe they could trade down on the attractiveness scale (stop fucking the same 20% of guys) so men are less likely to leave them? inb4: but all men run away
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:30 PM
2

How are you a maths teacher? Do you teach primary or highschool?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:24 PM
3

You think the average man has a forever girlfriend? I know blue pillers have a "different view", but are you sure you want to argue this? Respect for honesty I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:22 PM
3

Oh, so you agree that "just be yourself/a good person" is not only useless advice but also contrary to reality?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:19 PM
1

Good for you that what you observe in your immediate environment doesn't reflect the statistics "black pill leaning woman" what could you possibly be so black pilled about?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:17 PM
1

ONE TIME If women could take responsibility for just one thing Jesus fucking christ
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 12:16 PM
1

That's the point. Instead of having ALL men incrementally support a woman through involuntarily paying for her through tax, how about the man who gets her pregnant has to pay for her? And if he can't pay, tough shit for her and she could maybe choose better next time? And valuing men's traditional benefits to society without valuing women's Man it feels so good to be valued by society as a man! You know, the government and other organizations really do too much for single white men. What would I…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:08 AM
2

"If a high fertility rate is so good, then why are you opposed to paying for single mothers who raise terrible children?" Are you dense?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 02:04 AM
0

So is the source good enough for you or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 01:58 AM
2

The gender pay gap doesn't exist. Of course kids are a contribution. You seem to think men undervalue having a family - no, feminists and women undervalue having families. Families are so much more important than a fake ass office job.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/24 01:56 AM
4

You can't brag about doing the feminine things your own movement despises. It doesn't work like that
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:36 AM
5

It's the other way around. All women are socialists when it comes to net taxpayers money (hint: they are not net taxpayers) but become weirdly darwinistic when asked about dating. I would be much happier if I didn't have to pay tax to groups of people who don't contribute as much as me. At least I could retire in peace early without my money being destroyed by inflation and paid to people who hate me.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:31 AM
21

Women don't mentally process the 80% of men they rate unattractive as people. Therefore, when they say "We can't find good men" They really mean "We can't men in the 20th percentile of attractiveness who commit to us" Which is obvious, because why would that 20th percentile commit? This is a good rule in general. Any complaint they have about men only applies to that 20th percentile.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:26 AM
1

What do you do for a living?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:10 AM
2

I'm not arguing that calling kids pussies is a good thing
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:09 AM
1

first question: ok cupid graph Second question: https://psmag.com/environment/better-looking-people-best-personalities-89165 also ok cupid inb4: b-b-but online dating doesn't count!!!! (because it refutes my point)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:06 AM
0

And if we didn't source it with anything, you would be saying "erm, source? wheres your source?" when we do source things, you say "uh, this is old/not reputable/not representative/is irrelevant" Conveniently, this results in NOTHING being good enough for evidence. Funny how that works
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/24 02:04 AM
1

No, you implied men IN THE WEST WHERE MGTOW IS are wrong about birthrates and relationships. You then used the GLOBAL birthrate to disprove. Salt spotted the obvious contradiction and you tried to make it about race to prevent yourself from getting called out. This is the stupidest post I've seen here by far and that's saying something considering women browse the sub
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:18 AM
-1

No, we know that a small minority are very happy and getting a lot of sex from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:14 AM
0

It's in the majority of men's nature to chase women because they are unattractive. It's in the minority of men's nature to not have to chase women because they are unattractive. Redpill doesn't claim that it is natural for men to simp, it claims that it is natural for men to be attracted to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 06:13 AM
-8

Did you have sex with him? Even if you didn't, if a woman complains to a bottom 80% man about an ex, all the bottom 80% man thinks is "He is this and that, or did this and that, and she still fucked him. I don't get anyone, so even though she is complaining, he must be doing something right" The "doing something right" is usually just being attractive, but can be other things.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:38 AM
1

My bad, I was thinking about the above post. Though I do think it’s funny you’re lamenting lying about a promiscuous past while trying to justify lying to get more sex
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:31 AM
1

The only reason women defend this is that they hold other positions that require them to not admit certain obvious truths, like men having harder standards put on them and women having some privilege in some areas. You are right. The reason you think of it as a weird double bind situation is because it is, and it's a technique women use for debating really well
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:13 AM
1

Women should accept that being a net taxpayer is a serious condition and net taxpayers have the right to not want to pay welfare for single mums. I say this as someone who is a net taxpayer (white, single male)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:06 AM
2

So true! This lame sarcasm that is under every single post that talks about differences in standards for men and women is very logical! Men and women are the exact same, they don't have any differences, and what is ok in one gender should be ok in the other! Unless this results in men having an easier time of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 05:02 AM
2

You're assuming she calls the kids pussies to their face. And I agree, in an ideal world, everyone is nice and we all happily get along. But in reality, men are expected to be outgoing, confident, fit, neurotypical and they will never have a good relationship if they aren't. Additionally, not calling kids pussies doesn't prevent their peers from judging them to be pussies, which is the bigger issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/24 04:59 AM
1

Because the prerequisite to housework is someone who will provide for you financially. Assuming that all the feminist propoganda about marriage being evil doesn't affect women (which I think is true), it means women are so repulsed by the average betabuxx oofy doofy guy they would rather work than have a better material life under him. What's funny is when you see conservatives arguing that women really do like guys, they are just being tricked by the government etc. Like no, they really just do…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 11:03 PM
1

Engineering, sure (which women generally don't do). I refuse to believe 8 hours of spreadsheets is more interesting than 4 hours housework.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:52 PM
1

You have a gay perspective. It's not about the ideal, it's about what's true. If you made it illegal to call people pussies, pussies still exist. Do you understand the problem?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:52 PM
1

How many office jobs require brainpower greater than housework?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 10:11 PM
1

Funny that the average man is that unappealing? Housework isn't that hard lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/24 12:00 AM
1

Women working and voting benefits a small group of rich men, and fucks over everyone else. I'm not seeing the benefit of paying clerical employees slightly less, because I'm not a rich business owner. Although it is pretty funny women would rather serve a corporate boss doing meaningless busywork than be married to an oofy doofy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 05:27 AM
1

People generally arent attracted to the people they see on dating apps and with that im done lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/24 01:09 AM
1

is attraction nuanced? https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQyFAJQ_CVa3na6ywCcrIO7c5gCRsFWNXu8Bw&s The notion that "people are subjective, so we can't say anything definitive about anything" is retarded. Imagine a group of women vs a group of men. Let's say one guy out of the group has hair past his shoulders, and one woman has a buzzcut. Would you really believe that because these outliers exist, we can't say anything about the tendencies of groups?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:51 PM
1

Explain why it isn't how it works. Do you disagree with men formulating opinions about dating just because they are wrong, or you do actually disagree with men formulating opinions period? If not, just say you personally think his interpretation is wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:34 PM
1

ok, what is it about men debating how dating works that you dont like?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:29 PM
1

no shit women dont like the ugly reality of male effort exposed. and no shit they dont like the 80% of men who have to figure out why women arent equally attracted to them. things just happen to a woman. we see this on bumble, its only gimmick of "but the women have to message first" is going away. even before that, what happens? women send the most bland, boring messages they accuse men of sending on tinder. women always expect men to put on a show for them
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:27 PM
1

classic women debate tactic "why are you being so autistic and analytical? dating should just happen tee hee!" allows them to handwave the problem away because they know FULL well women dont have to put effort in.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:12 PM
1

how many autistic virgins have you gotten with?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:09 PM
3

"heh, we'll see how long you last on this debate sub before the mods (that agree with me) ban you for disagreeing" Not quite the own you think it is
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:04 PM
0

i have no idea what that is supposed to mean. they probably aren't that terrified given they have a lot of choice and only choose about 20% of men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:02 PM
1

and when the fertility rate drops off a cliff, what then? will the productivity of teachers and nurses and white collar paper pushers make up for it? do you mind refuting the iceland strike? imagine if 25% of men didnt show up to work
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 11:01 PM
1

no, the alternative is saying yes, we agree, tough shit for men. EQUALLY - tough shit for women. no more government support programs, complaining they dont get to be fortune 500 ceos, etc. also, remember when women didnt go to work at all for a day in iceland and nothing happened? women are not nearly as essential as you think they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 12:56 AM
4

no, i agree with feminists. expecting a woman to do anything of value is unrealistic and evil and also somehow misogynistic
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/24 12:52 AM
2

Misandry is basically the act of putting pressure on men to change for women’s purposes. But men aren’t going to change because at this point they are just acting out their biology. It’s up to women to change. Misandry is just what weak, lazy women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 05:28 AM
1

do you think there is a possibility that the rise of tate is due to him being the only male figure to point out the downsides of being male? i dont disagree he is a massive grifter
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 05:13 AM
2

LMAO just posturemaxx bro.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:28 AM
0

the tv box says it was an important issue so it must be an important issue and happening a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:10 AM
–

yeah its not being inhumane because you are not really a person. youre basically just a tax slave who shouldnt expect anything and be happy serving the matriarchal state
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:07 AM
1

dont lie and take my words out of context. i never said and there was no implication that i believed being messy is inherently good or masculine. to reiterate, my point is that any complaints women have about men only affect the 20% of men they actually date. all these stories about terrible boyfriends dont affect me or the 80% of men women dont like
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 03:03 AM
–

i mean im doing the same just theres a hard limit on how much u can cope. i will say no matter what its better than trying to get laid
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:53 AM
–

erm, if short men are drastically less likely to get relationships, then why do i occasionally see short men in relationships still? checkmate inkwells
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 02:52 AM
–

hard to say. we will probably never break down as much as people hope, no matter how hard women try and fuck things up
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:48 AM
–

a woman admitting it is possible to be fucked through genetics???? surely there's something he could do? personalitymaxxing? showermaxxing?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 07:41 AM
–

do you mean what will happen to society? whatifaltautist seems to think there will be a beta uprising/revolution. i dont think so. things will just decay slowly for years. if you mean what should happen, theres not much to do other than make it so laws are actually equal. no alimony, women dont get a tax advantage etc. just these small things would make it so much easier to life out my sexless life
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 05:12 AM
2

im no longer (as) socially anxious and no longer addicted to porn, nothings changed. this is not a just world bro
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 05:02 AM
3

this empathetic moment brought to you by the empathetic gender who are kind and more caring than the other gender
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 04:59 AM
2

nice implication that being a low value male is only because hes lazy. would be funny if it wasnt so hilariously cruel
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 04:56 AM
9

6ft men are nowhere close to as common as women wish they are, but they have to be out there. can they really not find anyone 6ft plus? are they too old or ugly or fat or some combination
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 04:48 AM
6

man, where all these women who date short ugly guys, get turned down for being too tall, love men who express their emotions at??? its so weird that on reddit they are everywhere but in real life ive never seen any?? i believe you but its still infuriating
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 04:44 AM
14

sexual dimorphism. but you can also say that genetically inferior women still get to reproduce, while men don't. yeah, being a man is harder but what are you going to do about it, kill yourself? may as well stick around and see how things turn out
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 04:17 AM
2

intimidating yeah, and men are intimidated by single mothers too. more likely men dont to give your poor cousins and sisters the ick by being too short compared to them
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 04:15 AM
2

i expressed myself and genuine feelings. somehow, i dont feel very helped :) funny how you couldnt pretend to be sympathetic for more than a few minutes
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 04:06 AM
–

i heard a woman talk about how her boyfriend only started cleaning up because she threatened a breakup and it was too little too late. all i thought was "he must have been really hot for you to tolerate him" no sympathy for women who date chad and are surprised he doesnt give a fuck
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:58 AM
1

great, have fun believing welfare works and poor people dont know having sex makes you pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:56 AM
0

would you prefer i use chad or chang? i dont know the hispanic variant
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:26 AM
–

lmao i dare a woman to reply to this
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:17 AM
0

this is a really good way of defending yourself. if you have to defend contradictions in an ideology, just claim that you dont personally hold those beliefs or that im mistaken. no, i know what i see. i see, with my eyes, many people who tend to be women posting exactly what i described. i dont buy that argument. "nobody is entitled to anything" except women to alimony and male tax dollars loollllll
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:15 AM
0

your post history includes the claim that there was never any pressure on men to be attractive or monogamous which is ridiculous. why dont you bother defending the bear argument too? both are retarded. and i never said i would be happy seeing a woman getting abused, just indifference or sadness at most\ also are you fat
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:13 AM
0

the way you weaseled in the implication that morality has anything to do with sexual success is very obvious. try being a subversive little cunt with a bit more grace
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:10 AM
-1

"get help" what happened to "you arent entitled to sex and we deserve your tax dollars" ????? oh, you mean go to a therapist and blame all my problems on toxic masculinity? or do you mean actual help? also yeah men who dont get laid are fustrated. i wonder why? maybe its because its a deep rooted biological desire and painful to deal with?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:07 AM
0

i dont have empathy for people who when asked about male problems say "yeah its bad but theres nothing we can do" "you arent entitled anything" yeah thats true. i do have empathy for people who like me though. i would be sad if my friends or family got hurt.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/24 03:05 AM
-1

what is that even supposed to mean? out of chance im the oldest child in the house but is that supposed to be good or bad?? are you implying men are children?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:54 PM
0

thats hilariously disingenuous and funny how quick you drop feminist talking points, but ill answer. i think not wanting to put yourself in danger for a woman is perfectly fine and i would consider myself to be moral and have moral standards. i wouldnt consider myself a good partner because i am ugly. some of my friends have more traditional standards/are stronger and would consider themselves bad people for not intervening
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:53 PM
0

what happens when a man steps in to help and then he gets put in jail by the state? what happens when the man steps in to help but then it turns out the man beating the woman is actually her boyfriend and she turns on you? these things happen in reality
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:50 PM
-2

what happened to men being more dangerous than bears? i thought it was rational and if i questioned that i was an evil misogynist? am i required to get savaged by a bear or worse to be a good man™ ?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:48 PM
-2

honestly? sometimes i wonder if i would be able to prevent the natural instinct to help a woman purely out of spite. but probably i would think of what my friends would think and help anyway. its a funny fantasy though
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:47 PM
–

if you dont fuck soon, theres a good chance you dont like him. there used to be a system where people would wait and the importance of being chaste in women was impressed upon them so that when they told men to wait, men could TRUST they hadn't previously fucked 10 guys on a whim. but women didn't like that system so here we are. its your fault :)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:46 PM
0

this isnt too relevant, but i feel like starting this argument. it is ok, with a beyond good and evil perspective on morality, for a hot man to want a chaste wife after he fucks around. female selection for hot men makes it ok for him to do this because they grant him power
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:43 PM
1

it was always socially unacceptable to cold approach if you are ugly. also, youtube demonetization? that happens to everyone in the manosphere, i dont care. if we are going by the online oppression olympics, then we should agree with nick fuentes since hes been cancelled the most harshly
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:38 PM
3

yeah we are not at all animals. we are beings of pure light who operate on logic and astrally project away from any animal instincts.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:28 PM
1

agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:27 PM
-2

i remember (in america i think) a woman getting assaulted on a subway and a man who minded his own business was lambasted on public tv for not doing anything. why should he be required to put himself in danger for a group who doesnt give him the time of day? sure, call the authorities. but as long as men are more dangerous than bears, wouldnt it make sense for other men to keep away?:
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:25 PM
3

literally everything a man could want in a woman is oppression. attractive? thats evil beauty standards. doesnt argue with him all the time? thats idk bad gender roles. cooks/cleans? also outdated gender roles. oh, and when women do outearn men in a relationship, the chance of breakup is much higher. how is that conforming?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:15 PM
1

pua grifting got btfo by the more mgtow/blackpill types. confidence above all? lmfao. just 1000 more cold approaches bro
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:07 PM
2

to play devils advocate the pair bonding ability and divorce percent climb really quickly even at a bodycount of 4
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:03 PM
2

as a not quite as autistic dude i feel that, i still need to exercise or i get sad but im definitely fucked when it comes to testosterone naturally. so i still have to subject myself to that hierarchy. i think avoiding it entirely is a female thing, men dont really get to ignore nature
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 11:02 PM
-5

is that statement not true? do you expect sexless men to care about women getting beaten by tyrone or even come to the rescue of women getting raped/robbed on the subway etc?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:50 PM
1

how many sexual experiences/relationships did you have before he met you
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:49 PM
8

i like how you added the example of a man ranting to women about not being able to do anal and get blowjobs out of the blue like that EVER happens. also cool how you imply all of our struggles boil down to being angry that we cant get sex 24/7 the empathetic gender i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:48 PM
-2

nothing hurts more than being an underclass and told that things are actually fine
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:45 PM
0

just acknowledge that we have it harder and you will have done more than 99% of women. oh and also believe that statement to be true because it is
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:44 PM
1

weird that as women get less attractive they somehow always change to prefer stability. also quite weird how its never women preferring stability when they are young and wanting chad at 30. maybe something else is at play here? also if you cant handle me at my worst fuck out of here
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:40 PM
2

omg wow they love le travel and are punishing le toxic evil men for wanting them to not be whores thats so wholesome! have some reddit karma kind strager
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/24 10:30 PM
1

being attracted to men. what causes this attraction will be some combination of factors that the 20-10% of men they fuck have. the strength of these factors is hotly debated but thats it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 04:13 AM
1

gee, i wonder when this stopped being possible for the average couple and why? oh well, guess we have no idea
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 02:39 AM
3

Funny you say this because I occasionally visit a tree planted in memorium to a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:18 AM
1

You should be decent enough to where random women don't try to destroy your life through social pressure. Yes, it's unfair you are held to a different standard, but don't fuck up your social life in protest. They've won and there's nothing you can do
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:05 AM
1

if you want, we can do the dance where i post dating app stats, you reject them, i post stats about the prevalence of dating apps, and you reject those too but it wont change much
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 01:02 AM
-1

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't force it to drink. I'm tired of leading.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:57 AM
0

the source is intellectual honesty, although i agree he doesnt need to bring up std rates to prove it
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:50 AM
2

I was being sarcastic with the hypothetical, although I'm not sure about women. It's certain that at least ONLY 20% of men are attractive to women, but it could be even higher. I have no idea what the numbers are for women only that they are better than mens.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:46 AM
3

Well, let's just say hypothetically that 20% of men fuck a lot of women, and 80% of men don't. This would mean only 20% of men are promiscuous. Let's also say that that same 20% of men didn't care as much about the percentile of women, and that they fucked 80% of women. You know have a situation where 80% of women are promiscuous, compared to 20% of men. Also, if it helps your fragile female ego, it's still possible women are less promiscuous compared to women of the past. Maybe women of previou…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:41 AM
–

That's hilariously disingenuous and you know it. If men did do a civil rights movement they would be met with hatred and white knights, and the easy rebuttal of "well, we can't force attraction" Also, name a better duo than women and concern trolling
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:39 AM
4

Overall? absolutely and it shouldn't even be a question. Also, men are disproportionately less promiscuous than women. The interesting question is are zoomer women less promiscuous overall (discounting them being promiscuous only with 20% of men, which is a given and different from overall promiscuity) and I don't know off the top of my head.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/24 12:36 AM
2

I never said they were, they aren't grifters
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 06:36 PM
3

Yeah, a lot of MGTOWs and other non grifters in the manosphere have had to concede the blackpill. The only ones holding out are the ones selling courses to 5/10 dudes telling them to just grind bro
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/24 05:43 AM
2

The absolute state of christcucks. What's your denomination?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 08:10 AM
4

Mainly the sample size. Since the data depicts women negatively I predicted the women in the subreddit would try scrutinize this. But yeah as many screenshots as possible
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 06:19 AM
26

Keep that same statistical rigor when it comes to negative statistics about men
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:49 AM
3

Yes please
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:17 AM
5

This is fascinating, do you have a link to this?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/24 05:06 AM
7

lmao f off and get real women fuck chad in spite of violence not because of a lack of violence. i dont see women shacking up with 5'6 asian engineering students
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:39 AM
8

"wow, chad is so attractive, he has so much life experience and is good at managing emotions" said no girl ever. if you are going to lie, at least make it good or dont be evil?????
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/24 02:32 AM
1

Gonna keep it a buck I wasn't expecting the argument to get this far. I have nothing on hand at all but I can start with the majority of divorces being initiated by women, about 80% iirc.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:53 AM
1

I'm happy that you are privileged enough to honestly believe that.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:31 AM
1

Court statistics show men getting fucked over. If you disagree with this basic fundamental fact there is nothing more I can do.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:23 AM
1

Hang on, what happened to women being able to tell which men hold incel beliefs? Are you suggesting women can't tell?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/24 12:22 AM
1

I thought women were expert judges of character? Apart from when he beats her or fucks other women or is a deadbeat of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:49 PM
1

back it up with court statistics then :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:24 PM
0

a surprisingly large number of women lie and steal all mens shit and take their kids???? no shit men would like if women had any incentive at all to remain in the marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 11:23 PM
4

came to figure out if i was right and now im addicted to retards i guess
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/24 10:57 AM
0

It's impressive what feminists and anti natalists will admit to when you don't ask them directly.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:37 PM
-1

I wonder how they are supposed to magically create wealth out of nowhere to raise wages? Or how they will force businessmen and the trades to construct and maintain houses for less money? Also, regardless of how you feel, there is a big correlation with giving women what they want and the birthrate. No judgement, just how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 09:35 PM
8

I'll believe it when I see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:38 AM
9

You hooked up with any short broke ugly dudes recently?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/24 12:14 AM
12

You wouldn't, because most men are unattractive to women. Nice try!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:55 PM
-7

how did you manage to find a woman who is good with money and reduces your stress?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:23 AM
1

shes not dating down
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:17 AM
1

lmao based im using this
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/24 11:11 AM
2

As a group I hate them. Their worst instincts are encouraged. Individual women I'm neutral, I don't hang around fuckwits so most of the women I know are fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 08:38 AM
9

If women did feel that their FWBs were better, they sure as shit wouldn't admit to it on Gender Wars: the subreddit. Not sure what the point of this post is
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/24 08:33 AM
1

Even if the lowly 80% of us were in a position to have a type, I don't think we would be as picky as women.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/24 07:43 AM
1

It's not a "le both sides are affected" thing. Women have leverage to secure a committed man if they want to, all they have to do is date down. But that will never happen. This idea that men are "scared of commitment" is a sick joke. Either men have legitimate reasons to not commit, (they do, divorce court) or they don't have to commit because the woman is fucking him already.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/24 08:45 PM
0

agreed, i love whatifalthist but the collapse is just not happening. regardless society still hates men
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/24 12:45 AM
–

I don't know how you can cope with that. I've managed to quit a porn addiction and I'm probably not even as unfortunate as you but I still get sad looking down the barrel of lifelong virginity. I wonder if it gets better when your hormones drop off. If there was a pill to get rid of all sexual urges I would take it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:50 AM
–

yeah premium suicide fuel. i dont watch it but i know hes legit
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/24 05:01 AM
1

I know what chart you are referring to. https://images.app.goo.gl/5MNncrSeMbVziLAM9
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/24 11:21 AM
2

https://youtube.com/shorts/LhKRBDjdM_U?si=7bmDm5FnEGU695p0 female cops are better at de escalating? Where'd you get that from?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/24 07:29 PM
2

That's fair, I also think Christianity is inherently better. Not sure about whether it's real but I do like it and want it to get better. I know when Islamic girls travel outside of Islamic countries obviously they are less Islamic, but aside from that I don't know much about relationship dynamics in Islamic countries.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 11:52 PM
0

I'd agree without doing any dating myself at all. To be honest, I'm hoping for Islam to infiltrate western countries and destroy Christianity because the catholic church is cucked and serves women. Do you still have hope for the Catholic church in the long term?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:38 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upqalNo4dUc&t=2462s&pp=ygUWYWFyb24gY2xhcmV5IGNocmlzdGlhbg%3D%3D I'm quite interested in your flair. Would you mind explaining how dating as a catholic is bad? Also if you have time do you agree with aarons perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/24 10:16 PM
1

shit there goes my entire argument. i guess since i have to pay so little it just doesnt matter at all. by any chance could you give me 50 dollars? its not that much, and i think i deserve it. you probably spend more on other things like rent and food, so surely 50 dollars doesnt matter in the scheme of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/24 12:24 AM
13

great. i was groomed by the government since 18 to work and pay tax for single mums and i feel violated. can i please get a million dollars?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/24 11:29 PM
3

it comes from reality
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/24 07:07 AM
1

women will "check out" of relationships with men but then continue complaining about the pay gap, having one night stands whenever they feel the urge, occasionally receive wealth transfers in the form of men paying more tax, etc. it's hard to say women can ever truly "check out" as long as the state holds men responsible to provide for women indirectly,
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/24 01:53 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter