TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

im_not_a_gay_fish Archive

View 1 post and 113 comments by im_not_a_gay_fish on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

If you want a study about gender disparity, read a study about gender disparity. This sub only posts about a hundred a week. If you want a study about disparity of men killing strangers vs killing partners, read this one. Or another one. I'm sure there are a few. Reading one, knowing what it is about beforehand (because I assume you can read the title and ascertain the general content from that) and complaining that it doesn't mention another, is stupid. Its no wonder noone takes us seriously. I…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 04:27 PM
-2

No, you are trying to make the point that we shouldn't care if studies intentionally try to distort the narrative. I...wow
/r/MensRights08/04/16 04:23 PM
-2

The study may be flawed. I wasn't arguing that it wasn't. There are many reason why men might get more time for killing a stranger. For instance, one reason might be its in the course of another crime. Another might be a "murder for hire" situation. One reason might be that domestic murders are more likely crimes of passion, and therefore not capital murder. I'm simply stating that getting all pissy because a study about one thing doesn't mention another thing that you happen care about MORE is …
/r/MensRights08/04/16 04:01 PM
-1

This article wasn't trying to distort anything. It just wasn't about what you wanted it to be about. Study: Sentence disparity for males when they commit murder against a stranger vs murder against their intimate partner. What kind of sentence does a man get if he murders a stranger? What kind does he get if he murders his girlfriend? Hmmm...kind of a disparity there, what could cause it? Period. That's it. Its not about men v women prison sentences. Its not about education disparity between men…
/r/MensRights08/04/16 03:41 PM
0

Get out of here with your feminist logic. Don't you know that any study that comes out that doesn't focus on how shitty men are treated compared to women is obviously bias feminist agenda? I mean, just the other day i was reading a bullshit feminist article on how bananas are going extinct, and not once did it mention that men lack reproductive rights and are overcrowding prisons. Obviously written by feminists, for feminists
/r/MensRights08/04/16 01:40 PM
28

Just as its bullshit that college age men have to take classes "teaching them not to rape", I dont think teachers should be required to take these either. Its completely insulting. "Teachers" dont have sex with kids. Child molesters do. No amount of classes will stop them. If I were a teacher, i would be pissed that someone would think I would "potentially" have sex with a student simply because I could. I would, however, be in favor of a class that teaches how to recognize signs of inappropriat…
/r/MensRights23/03/16 05:59 PM
2

We are not talking about attacking and lying in the general sense. We are talking about people who break the law on order to ruin other people's lives. Only the shitty people do that, and it has nothing to do with gender. Or are you asking "Why to these particular shitty people commit this one specific act vs other specific acts that other shitty people commit?" When your teenager comes home from college crying that a dude raped/groped/attacked her, are you going to just assume she is lying beca…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 07:03 PM
3

Ive heard this line of thinking before, but when talking about men and rape...or men and violence...or men and abuse. Again, I swear I wish I were a mod of this sub so I could rename it to "full horseshoe". Remove all gender tags and you wouldn't be able to tell this sub from r/feminism or tumblr or SRS. Its wrong when "they" say it. Its wrong when you say it, too. Fact is you ran into an asshole. This asshole happened to be a woman. Don't lump "women" in with "asshole women". They are different…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 05:19 PM
6

The same reason "Men rape". The same reason "black people steal" The same reason "Italians run protection rackets". Some people are shitty. Some people are opportunistic sociopaths who will do whatever it takes to get what they want, regardless of how it affects other people. "Women" dont make false claims anymore than "men" rape. Rapists rape. Sociopathic liars make false claims Why they do it is easy. Because they want to, and because they can. Sometimes they get punished, sometimes they dont …
/r/MensRights25/02/16 04:56 PM
5

No, of course not, and what the fuck does this have to do with Men's Rights? I swear this sub really is becoming what "they" say it was from the beginning - just a place to hate on women...but I digress. I have been into comedy for a very long time, to the point where for a while I was actually thinking of becoming a stand up comedian when considering career choices. Why am i telling you this? Becuase I have been paying attention to the scene for a long time. It started back in the late 80's/90'…
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:10 PM
6

Nah, I dont see it as praising her or anything, but then again I dont go looking for shit to be offended by. I saw it as the same speech Ive been given many times whenever I fuck up. "you're a smart talented good looking person with a bright future, why would you go and fuck it up like this?" I'm sure that judges are more disappointed when they put away people with bright futures than they are when they put away people who everyone knew was going to be a big fuckup. This teacher was an intellige…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 06:06 PM
-5

I guess I dont see anything wrong with this article. I agree with everything the author stated. His tweets were perfectly legal, but they (probably) go against Twitter's policy. I guess I dont get why this is a "bad" article that we shouldn't "give clicks" to.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 08:44 PM
-3

I started this whole thing by replying to this: She was in the locker room, I feel no sympathy even if it played out just as she said it did. (emphasis mine) Why would we not stick to her version of the events if her version of the events is literally the topic? I can't tell your tone here My tone is that if he was in fact changing clothes, or showering, or simply walking around naked, then he did nothing wrong. He was doing none of those. He was in a towel when she walked in. If someone violate…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 08:21 PM
-4

First off, that comes as speculation. Second, we don't know if anything else proceeded that. She could have said something provocative first for all we know. First off, noone knows what happened in there except those three people. But, we are currently talking about her version of the events, So i am sticking with those. Your 8 year old probably doesn't realize that you're in there. The reporter there does probably realize that some man is in the locker room before she walks in. No she didn't, s…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 07:59 PM
-7

And if he was doing either, and she walked in on him, i would agree. But he wasn't. He was covered, and then purposefully exposed himself while taunting her. You gonna tell me that having your 8 year old daughter walk in on me while I'm peeing and seeing my junk is the same as her walking into the bathroom while I'm washing my hands, and then I pull down my pants and taunt her? In fact, scratch that. Same situation I'm in a locker room changing clothes and your 8 year old daughter (or niece, or …
/r/MensRights06/01/16 07:30 PM
-9

You still ignore the fact that there is no reason for a woman to be in the men's locker room You're right, I am. Because it is completely irrelevant to this particular case. It would be completely relevant, however, if she walked in on a bunch of players changing and complained. But, that is not what happened. Back to my example, even If I told my SIL that I didn't want her in my room, and locked the door, and barricaded it, and yelled "I have a gun!", and she barged in anyway, I would be just a…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 06:10 PM
-13

Finally a voice of reason. Over Christmas break a couple weeks ago I was in my bedroom watching TV. Now, as everyone knows my bedroom is where I sleep and change clothes. Well, as I was watching TV my Sister In law came in to borrow one of my wife's coats before they went to lunch. Naturally, I dropped my pants and started waving my junk at her saying "is this what you wanted?" Can you believe that bitch told my wife that I was "exposing" myself to her? Where does she get off? She was in MY fuck…
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:41 PM
-1

Downvoted for using logic
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:34 PM
1

Well, if her story is true, then he did expose himself. If he was covered, then looked at her, then dropped his towel and said "are you looking for this", then he did, in fact, expose himself.
/r/MensRights06/01/16 05:21 PM
0

Were we talking about male heart disease research in relationship to Breast Cancer? I thought the article was about breast Cancer vs. Prostate cancer research.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:02 AM
1

I don't think i used the words "wasting" or "less worthy". Yeah he could die sniffing glue as well. I mentioned that in my post, but arguing about infinite possibilities gets philosophical. The FACT (yes, verifiable fact) is that there is a finite amount of money for cancer research. That is fact. It is not opinion. It is not a political stance. It is a fact. We do not have infinite money to sink into every area of medical research. If we did that with the finite amount of money we DO have, then…
/r/MensRights14/11/15 12:00 AM
-1

Did you see the last one when you continue the thread? Holy shit. Full conspiracy theory mode.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:20 PM
1

Whoa. Kinda went full tinfoil hat there.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 10:16 PM
1

No, a white knight is a concern troll who comes into an MRA subreddit trying to tell us we have to be good to women and put women first and worry about the fee-fees of women. Literally said none of that. Didn't even imply it. But, you'll read into whatever you want to read into I guess. Also, Ive been a member of this sub for 3 years on this account, 4 on my main account. Not attacking women as a whole isn't the same as putting them first. We are about EQUALITY, not denigration. Literally every …
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:53 PM
0

Ah, thats right. In this sub: Troll = Someone who disagrees with you Feminist = Someone who disagrees with you White Knight = Someone who disagrees with you
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:38 PM
1

Except were not talking about the valuing of human lives. We are not saying "young people's lives are worth more than old people's lives". We are saying "putting money here gives us greater benefit as a whole than putting money there". Although it can be confused with "these lives matter more", its not about that at all. Noone is putting value anywhere other than what the research "buys" us. With breast cancer, it buys up to 40 years on average. With Prostate, it only buys a few years, tops. Not…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:34 PM
0

That's the spirit!
/r/MensRights13/11/15 09:24 PM
2

While the facts are true, it's wrong to value younger peoples lifes higher. In fact it's wrong to value anyones life higher than others. Definitely have to disagree with this If we are researching medicine, we have to do it in areas that give us the greatest benefit. Helping younger people live full lives (even if they are women) is definitely more beneficial than helping those who have lived full lives live slightly longer ones (even if they are men). It has nothing to do with which lives are m…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:59 PM
1

White Knight? Really? "We should make useful logical arguments instead of emotional bitter ones so that we draw more people to our cause and can actually start to affect change" "Stop being a White Knight" "That's the spirit!"
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:50 PM
-2

Yes, because suggesting men have worth outside of earning money for women is "whining" It is when you say it completely out of context in the most bitter, whiny way possible, yeah. For instance: Someone: A man's only purpose is to earn money for women. Outside of that they are useless You: I disagree. Men have much more innate value than providing money for women or earning money for a company. That's not so bad. Someone claimed that men's only purpose is to earn money for women, you disagreed. …
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:37 PM
2

Because we cant look at "individuals" when doing funding like this. If we are researching life saving medicine, its best to focus on areas that would give us the greatest benefit. Helping 25-40 year old people live to 75 is more "rewarding" than helping 71 year old people live to 75. If we have limited resources it makes more sense to help young people live to old age than to help old people live to a slightly older age.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:13 PM
-2

Thank you for saying this. I was worried that noone would say something that would make MRAs look like whiny, bitter morons.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 08:09 PM
1

there was a /s after that paragraph, lol. I was mocking everyone that replied to my earlier comment. All of them seem to think my wife's degree is useless (even though she is still working?), and seem to think her only goal is to mooch off of me. Seriously, scroll up a bit and look at all the bitter fuckwits that commented on my wife going to college even though she wanted to be a SAHM.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:22 PM
3

Why bother going to college and wasting your degree if all you were gonna do is sit around all day at your "job" as a SAHM and mooch off of your husband? Probably while cheating on him constantly until you find another man to mooch off of, but not before divorcing your husband, taking everything he has and making sure he can never ever see his kids again and-oh-my-god-women-are-just-terrible-all-the-time /s Seriously, some of the people on this sub are bordering on sickening. Sometimes i wonder …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 09:04 PM
-3

Same thing about professional athletes, actors/actresses, comedians, carpenters, contractors, small business owners, anything else that doesn't require a college degree. A college education is more than just a degree that gets you a career.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:11 PM
-4

To get an education and a job? What a fucking retarded question.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 07:02 PM
8

Tackling isn't a punishment or a repercussion. Tackling is a way for police officers to neutralize a threat. Are you going to tell me that they should handle a 5'4 100lb suspect they same way as they would a 6'3 225 lb suspect in regards to force?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:31 PM
16

What do you mean by "same treatment"? They grabbed her and carted her off (presumably to a cop car). Are you upset they didn't tackle her? They handled it the way they should have.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:25 PM
-2

This has nothing to do with her being a SAHM. This has everything to do with her being selfish. I would love for my wife to be a SAHM. She wants that, too. In fact, that is her goal and has been since we were in college. But, we have two kiddos now and we simply cant afford it and keep up with our lifestyle. So, she works. She will continue to work until we can afford for her to be a SAHM, which may never happen. But "never marry someone who wants to be a SAHM" is not a very productive statement…
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:20 PM
-14

There has to be more to this. Why would anyone take in a homeless person off the street? Especially someone who claims to be 14? OK, so maybe she told him she was 20, she told the cops she was 14 and then it came out she was 23. I could definitely believe that, but you would still have to be a complete fuckwit to take in a 20 year old homeless woman and just let her crash at your place. Then, after police found out who she was, etc...they still went onto prosecute for Pandering. Why? If there wa…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 07:12 PM
0

I may be wrong but I honestly cannot ever recall seeing video of a female athlete being interviewed while changing in the locker room. You'd think if this was as essential to the fan experience as claimed you'd see more interviews of Alex Morgan wrapped in a towel answering questions while surrounded by reporters. Irrelevant. Ive never been filmed changing either. Then again, I work in IT, where that doesn't happen. Whether or not media is allowed in the locker room is up to the organization tha…
/r/MensRights22/10/15 08:31 PM
1

Its not a blanket rule, it comes down to the rules of the organization. In the NFL, cameras are allowed in the locker room. I think in Soccer, they aren't. Has nothing to do with "men vs women". It has everything to do with what the organization governing the league says. For instance, I was allowed to go off campus for lunch in high School. My cousin was not. It wasn't discrimination, because we went to different schools. My school allowed it, hers did not.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:57 PM
0

Sure they do, but this isn't discrimination any more than black lung is. Don't want blisters? Don't be a carpenter Don't want black lung? Don't be a coal miner Don't want to take your clothes off for money? Don't be a stripper Don't want to change in front of the media? Don't play in NFL/NBA/MLB/ or have any other job that puts you in that position.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 07:54 PM
-1

You guys make this sound like this some kind of law or something, It isn't. This is NFL policy. In the NFL, the media is allowed in the locker room after the game. If you dont like it, dont play in the NFL. Alternatively, you could wait until they leave to change. Again, if you dont like it, dont play in the fucking NFL.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 04:42 PM
12

Doesn't matter if it happens to a man or a woman. Its terrible and the liars should be punished.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 01:54 PM
45

I will say that the rules changed me. Outside of work, I am very nice. I notice and compliment both men and women on physical appearance as well as accomplishments. If a friend of mine gets a haircut, i compliment them on it. If they happen to be dressed well, I notice. I have never gotten a single complaint...outside of work. But, back in 2002 I was a 20 year old college student working at a department store at the mall. One of my female coworkers had long hair, but decided to cut most of it of…
/r/MensRights01/10/15 05:54 PM
3

This is amazing. I have always said how sex was too much fun and that there weren't enough hoops to jump through. This addresses both of those.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 05:47 PM
2

I disagree with gendering being about ideology. The backlash with this target thing is definitely ideological in nature though. Its not like they're going to be mixing the toys all over the place. That would be a nightmare for shoppers and employees. They're not gonna start putting the barbies mixed in with RC trucks. However, getting rid of the pink/blue shelving backgrounds might make kids more comfortable choosing toys that are "normally" for the other gender. A kid might find a toy they woul…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 08:29 PM
5

That's a pretty narrow view to take. This was a pretty decent article on the state of prisons. Around 240 prisoners die in custody every year. Many of them are self harming (They even called out men on that one - but i guess not enough). Prisons are becoming increasingly violent and dangerous for everyone due to cutbacks and overcrowding (male AND female). But, because they didn't frame it as a "men's issue" you're going to dismiss it as intentionally misleading? This is why noone will ever take…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 04:43 PM
2

Ive noticed that many on this sub use "feminist" as a catch all insult to anyone who says something disagreeable.
/r/MensRights14/07/15 03:11 PM
170

Soooo...were mad because in an article about how bad the prison system is, they didn't single out men? Are we becoming that petty? That we have to go out and look for ways to feel slighted? This article isn't about men or women. Is about prisoners and the prison system. Yes, the majority are men, but this article isn't about that. Its about the general state of the prison system, male and female. Take a deep breath, fellas. There's plenty to feel offended about, we dont have to go looking for it…
/r/MensRights14/07/15 01:50 PM
-1

no, the mom and boyfriend were in the house
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:33 PM
3

If any parent is poisoning the children against the other, that is just horrible. I agree. Its just that this story has been reposted about every 5 minutes on this sub for the last several days. I have read about it from a few different news articles as a consequence. I have not read any evidence of the mother "brainwashing" the kids other than the judge saying she believes the mother is. No voicemails, recordings, testimonies, eyewitness accounts, emails, texts, etc. showing the mother to be ac…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:17 PM
0

Where do you see "feminist"?
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:19 PM
2

Well, since gender switching is a favorite hobby of this sub...how would this sub react if the roles of mom/dad were reversed? Anyone who says "the same way" is delusional.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:11 PM
-1

So you're going to pretend the sexism thing doesn't exist. Nope, its right here However, its all the other stuff I'm worried about. There is an agenda for sure with this bill. It goes far beyond feminism and silencing MRA's who speak out against it.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:18 PM
-2

Personally I'm fine sounding like a whiny cry baby if it otherwise is beneficial That's fine for you, but I try to set the bar a bit higher for myself and organizations I'm supposed to be a part of. And this is a very serious issue even if you don't recognize it. I do recognize it, and it goes far beyond MRM. This is an issue for all citizens and users of the internet, not just those with penises. This is a major step into world wide internet censorship. The internet should be a free and open fo…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 08:08 PM
-12

Fair enough but you aren't saying we're wrong are you? I'm saying you (and by extension we) sound like a bunch of whiny cry babies and its embarrassing for MRM and its members. This entire sub is becoming "but if it were a woman" or "Ill bet in the future men will..." or "this tumblr blogger said something retarded, lets talk about how bad men have it these days." I get it, men are treated differently and it sucks, but there are more important battles to fight. More important BIG picture things.…
/r/MensRights01/07/15 02:46 PM
-17

I just read the article. As troubling as internet censorship is (and I do find it troubling), did this sub really just read an entire article, take ONE word from it (sexist), and then start whining? "gee, why wont anyone take MRM movement seriously?"
/r/MensRights01/07/15 01:40 PM
1

word.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 05:01 AM
5

Jesus tapdancing Christ, this is not true at all. Anyone who has been on the internet for more than 30 seconds knows its full of nip-slips, crotch shots and nude beach pics. The only time i have ever seen "outrage" is if a pic/video comes from a "leak" (Fappening, some sex tapes relseased by boyfriends/bodyguards) or an illegal source (such as spying through a peephole - Erin Andrews). This as not a "leak" nor was it taken illegally. This is the same as Paris Hilton's nasty snatch being paraded …
/r/MensRights12/06/15 08:59 PM
1

Wow, really guys? This is a typical "fluff science" article with a clickbait title. Researchers experiment with importance of sexual selection. Reporter gives it clickbait title and fluffy, easy to digest wording so people who are not scientifically literate will actually read it. Those who are scientifically literate will most likely read about the study through a journal or science news website. Nothing to see here, move along.
/r/MensRights19/05/15 06:03 PM
0

Isn't this just who you have to list on the form to see if your eligible for aid? As in "if you marry a single mom your income is used to see if their child is eligible for aid"
/r/MensRights05/05/15 03:39 PM
0

None of those things I said were true about me, although you are free to believe it if you want I literally have no response to this. I quoted you word for word. Copy and paste. Jesus Also. Why would I want to take your advice? You provide NOTHING of value, as a matter of fact, you tend to cause harm and destruction. OK, then don't take it. "make yourself emotionally and physically attractive" is clearly destructive behavior? Christ.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:34 PM
-1

I haven't seen a single post you have written other then the few here on this thread, which reads like a laundry list of excuses as to why you cant get laid or change your perception of yourself. (in fact you seem like the kind of person that could have a whole team of people giving advice, and shoot down each one for a different reason) You're gonna tell me you don't sound bitter and view women as the problem? I'm literally just going down the list: If I could have fucked all the girls in my li…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:26 PM
-2

"Most women" still isn't true. You have a very skewed perspective clearly stemming from your lack of social skills and your perception of how often you should be getting laid and with the caliber of women who should be doing the laying. Also, nothing i said in my post was an insult to you. You do sound bitter. You admit you have no social skills. Your posts clearly reflect your lack of confidence. You also put women on this pedestal and frame it in such a way that sounds like you think women are…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 09:02 PM
-1

A lot of what you just said, for lack of a better word, is horseshit. There are plenty of women that cant get laid to save their life. In fact, there is one in our group of friends that is constantly complaining about her sex life (or lack thereof). Of course, she could simply lower her standards, but then again, so could any man. I guarantee you that if you lower your standard enough, you could be having sex within the hour. Honestly, you just sound bitter. If your previous posts are any indica…
/r/MensRights29/04/15 08:52 PM
-1

Motivation. Its hard work to change things come naturally to you. There are plenty of guys that got tired of being shot down, so they put in the work (whatever that work had to be). If your goal is to simply get laid as much as possible, you have to work on the things that attract girls that fuck strangers.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:51 PM
41

where the hell are these people getting all this acid? Like, i could spray some Windex in your face or something. But who just has sulfuric acid in their house?
/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:03 PM
31

Meh...I look at cases like these the same way i look at cases where both people are abusive toward each other. Her: a rich gold digger looking to marry a rich guy Him: A rich guy looking for a rich beautiful woman whether she is obviously in it for the money or not. He trades her in for a younger model and is surprised that she is going after...wait for it...his money. Shallow people leading shallow lives.
/r/MensRights24/03/15 03:10 PM
1

It just reminds me so much of the "If a few innocent men spend time in jail for rape in order to get other men to be more cautious then its worth it". Total bullshit. This sub calls feminists out on their abhorrent ideologies, then they cheer for the same shit when it happens to a woman. Then they wonder why people think MRAs seem like a bunch of whiny woman haters.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:20 PM
2

This doesn't make it right. I would rather do whats right then make a point. This argument sounds very similar to one ive heard before where locking up a few people (who may be innocent) might "serve the common good". It doesn't work for their side, and it doesn't for ours. If an adult has consensual sex with a minor, there should be a punishment. This should include losing your job (if applicable) and possible jailtime/fitting community service/etc. 15 years for having sex with someone who was …
/r/MensRights19/03/15 06:38 PM
13

It couldn't be that we do it for everyone. No it couldn't be that we were raised to be polite and helpful. No we aren't being nice people and spreading the infectious feelings of smiling You could say...its our privilege
/r/MensRights11/03/15 03:17 PM
-1

but vaccines are necessary? No they are not, they are just helpful (unless the kid has a reaction and dies, which is known to happen, although rare). There are plenty of people who are not vaccinated and are healthy (or healthier) than we are. Its a preventative procedure. Preventative does not mean necessary.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:45 PM
-1

Is the medically unnecessary part really what bothers you? Because your argument really reminds me of those given by anti-vaxxers. Replace circumcision with vaccine and penis with child and its almost word for word. the problem is that your circumcision vaccination was fine and you didnt suffer any complication, thats why you cant see it the big deal. But imagine if your penis child had been damaged gotten sick or died, all because your parents you wanted your genitals child to look better have …
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:24 PM
-3

so why must that mean you get to force it on others? When you say "others" who are you talking about? My kids? Because as parents you make decisions for your kids based on what YOU think is the best course of action. Some of those things are permanent. Some are less so For instance, I vaccinated them as well. There are a lot of people out there who are against it for many reasons. I think that those reasons are unfounded and rare. There ARE cases of children who die or are hospitalized because o…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 09:10 PM
-3

I look forward to reading all about it on your tumblr.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 08:05 PM
-8

Me neither. Its one of the MRM's "stances" that i just can't get behind. I am circumcised. My dad is as is my brother and my sons. Most of my friends are as well. None of us mind, in fact most of us prefer it. (as do our wives) But, of course, there are many who are against it. Most of those are not circumcised to begin with. Yet, they tell us how we are mutilated and had our rights taken away and how we are victims that just aren't smart enough to realize how wronged we were by our shitlord par…
/r/MensRights10/03/15 07:15 PM
0

This was probably more motivated by racial tensions than by the crime itself or his gender. Same thing may have happened if he were in jail for vandalism.
/r/MensRights06/03/15 05:35 PM
14

I'm thinking a man would get 30 years for a similar crime.
/r/MensRights12/02/15 10:35 PM
1

So heartbreaking Sadly, Ive been on this sub so long that i assumed somewhere the article was going to mention how the mother/state/whoeverthefuck was trying to take the kid away from him because reasons. Glad it didn't go in that direction. Sure, the heartless bitch left him to care for a special needs child by himself, but at least he has the option to do so. And, to be honest, the kid is probably better off without someone like that woman in his life. I couldn't imagine giving up my child bec…
/r/MensRights06/02/15 04:29 PM
16

10 (Mensoring) was the best. Love it.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 05:07 PM
7

Thatcher Gates is no stranger to the inside of a Duval County courtroom. The 37-year-old violent sexual predator has faced charges over the past decade of forcible sodomy, false imprisonment, robbery, rape, and impersonating a police officer. Its not like the state is rounding up men to throw in prison because they "might" commit a crime someday. They are taking violent criminals and putting them in prison when they are caught again. Its just that now if a violent criminal is caught shoplifting …
/r/MensRights18/12/14 03:46 PM
2

This is from the young turks. Most of what they say about male rape victims is along the lines of "get over it and man up you lucky bastard, stop whining". Really surprised they even cared enough to mention this story. Most likely because it was a political prisoner and therefore a nice pretty "human rights violation" they can get a hard on over. If this were a dude on the street (or a 14 year old high school student), and not a detainee, then they would have probably mocked him like they do the…
/r/MensRights11/12/14 04:48 PM
8

Came here to say this. Seems that this sub is getting inundated with clickbait titles full of half truths or blogposts by some college undergrad who just got dumped by her cheating ex. Thinking it might be time to unsub sooner rather than later.
/r/MensRights05/12/14 02:49 PM
8

I get that you're bitter, but "women" are not the problem. "They" are not out to get you. "Women" are not self centered entitled "princesses". If you have that attitude, you're going to be alone for quite some time. You made a mistake with your first marriage. Learn from it, and try not to make the same mistake again. Find a woman (or man if that's your thing) that you can build a life of fulfillment, happiness and mutual respect with.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:21 PM
-1

Man, I was so happy when I found this sub a couple of years ago. All of those things that I used to think but couldn't well articulate layed out in front of me. Other thought the same way as I did! I wasn't crazy! I was so happy to see that people cared about the health of men, the unfair laws, the unjust treatment (at times). Posts like this and its comments are going to make me unsub pretty soon. Its becoming like the atheism sub. Its things like this that cause non MRAs to call us whiny cry-b…
/r/MensRights13/10/14 09:49 PM
1

Oh man, the robinson's ad....who's cutting all these onions?
/r/MensRights14/08/14 02:39 PM
1

Yes...how obtuse of the stripper at the strip club to think such a silly thing about a dude who was with a group of dudes who went to a strip club specifically to think with their dicks. Whatever man. I dont think you're "queer". I dont think you're a "fag". I do think you're making a mountain out of a molehill over expected behavior, considering where said behavior took place. If this had happened literally anywhere else outside of the sex industry, I would agree with you completely and wholehe…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:52 PM
2

Harsh or not, it is what it is. If you go to a place known for an activity, then dont be surprised when said activity happens to you, no matter how much you protest or dont want it to happen. Its great to have an ideology and beliefs. But you cant suspend reality in order to have them. The reality is that people get groped in strip clubs. Sometimes its not wanted. If you dont like it, dont go there. To complain about something happening to you at a place where that thing happens to everyone ther…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:01 PM
2

Except women groping you is an expected result of going to a strip club. That's what they're paid to do and what 99.99% of their clientele expects.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 06:43 PM
1

I'm all for equal rights and not double standards....but I'm gonna go ahead and play the "what the fuck did you expect" card. You're at a strip club. The girls there get paid to flirt, be aggressive and grab your junk, regardless of what the "rules" say. Every club Ive been had the no touching rule, and it was ignored every time, by both of us. That's what you get when you go to a STRIP club. This wasn't the grocery store, this wasn't church, you weren't getting your oil changed at Valvoline, he…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 05:53 PM
1

Brother speaks the truth
/r/MensRights24/07/14 02:26 PM
3

It could be that Whoopi was not thinking very clearly and defending her friend before it was clear what he was charged with, and once it became clear, she was trapped and dug in. Well, she said this a few years ago (2009 maybe?)...30 some odd years after Roman Polanski had already been exiled, so I doubt it was a case of her not knowing the situation. I mean, its pretty common knowledge that he drugged, raped, and sodomized an unconscious 13 year old (back in the 70's). There was a pretty big tr…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 06:37 PM
9

I dunno man, I still cant get over her saying that what Roman Polanski did to that 13 year old wasn't "Rape-Rape". That said, I do agree with what she is saying here, to a point. If someone slaps or hits someone else as a "one-off", I dont think you should hit them back. Hitting is wrong unless it is self defense. I look at like this: I am a gun owner. I keep a 9mm with Hornady Critical Defense Flex Tips loaded in the magazine. If someone breaks into my house and threatens my family I have the r…
/r/MensRights05/06/14 01:47 PM
31

I love the verbiage used. "He killed two women" "A student" "Two cyclists"
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:11 PM
6

huh?
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:05 PM
3

I dont see the problem here. Man up and just fuck her. You must be gay. Where were all these hot coworkers when I was a server. Don't ruin it for everybody else. /s
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:36 PM
0

Well....to be fair, hes the one that's famous. Noone really knows or gives a shit who Edie whats her name is. That's journalism. "Paul Simon arrested" gets the clicks. If I were a journalist looking for a Hook of a headline, that's exactly what I would use. I mean, imagine if he were caught in a gambling bust with 15 other unknowns. Would the headline read "15 people, including Paul Simon arrested for underground goat racing". No. It would just say "Paul Simon arrested and charged with goat race…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:40 PM
1

ah, the long con
/r/MensRights28/04/14 02:06 PM
-1

I might be missing something, but i dont really have a problem with anything said here. Mostly because of this line Fourth, Peplau argues To me, it sounds like this is a section discussing the views and conclusions of a particular psychologist/feminist/researcher of some kind, specifically what this person may have written in a particular book or study that they did. Psychology is not an EXACT science from what I understand. There are many different psychologists with many different views. I don…
/r/MensRights03/04/14 02:09 PM
2

Good video, but it could use more shitty music in the background. I was almost able to actually concentrate on the video.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 05:17 PM
4

When my wife found out she was pregnant back in may, one fo the the first things we did was get our then 20 month old son a baby doll complete with bottle and diaper. Best thing we ever did. My second son was born 2 weeks ago today and our now 2 1/2 year old absolutely loves him. He likes to hold him and feed him and play with him. There have been no tantrums and no actions other than loving the hell out of his little brother.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 02:11 PM
0

Depends on what they're selling. If a stripper is selling sex, I would expect her to touch me in way that could be deemed (vastly) inappropriate anywhere else. If a Krav maga instructor was trying to sell me lessons, I might expect him to grab my wrists or arms in a way that would be (vastly) inappropriate anywhere else. I would also think, that even my consent was not given, that they had a reasonable assumption that the consent is implicit because I came to them to an establishment that specia…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:33 PM
8

Not all schmoozing is good schmoozing. Also, I've typed the word schmoozing today more than I ever have before. Schmoozing.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:25 PM
1

Well, yeah. That's what you were there for. If you dont want skanky chicks getting aggressive with you, you probably shouldn't go to a stripclub where girls are paid to be skanky and get aggressive with the patrons. You would probably get kicked out of a carpet store if you started causing a scene because some salesperson was trying to aggressively sell you carpet.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 09:01 PM
12

I would disagree. The main reason, is because of the reason you are tehre in the first place. YES, the girls are trying to schmooze you and what not just like some men do to some women at nightclubs, but the main difference is that you are there specifically to be schmoozed. Its like if you go to a car dealership, the dude is gonna schmooze you so that you will buy a car, which is why you are there in the first place. When a woman goes to a nightclub, she could be there for a variety of reasons.…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 08:58 PM
1

Not all women are like this though. Not even MOST. There are a lot, yeah, but so what? The beauty of being an autonomous person is that you can make your own decisions. That decision can be "I will only date guys that make 6 Figures a year and have a credit score of at least 780." Another person can make a decision that says "I will only date women that like me for me and not because of what I earn". Your post reminds me of a coworker I had. She was always complaining that "men only care about l…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 09:12 PM
1

It isn't bad behavior though. People are attracted to different things. Some people are attracted to fit bodies. Some are attracted to bank accounts. Its not good or bad, it just IS. Yes, it is shallow. But being shallow isn't bad or wrong. Again, it just IS. The majority of people are attracted to full packages. I like my women to be intelligent, good looking, conscientious, nice, and witty. Some men like their women to be blonde and have a D cup Some women like guys who play guitar and write p…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:56 PM
3

I dont see what that has to do with it. Just becuase they act ridiculous doesn't mean we have to.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 06:30 PM
13

I have no problem with this. If there is a woman who thinks finances are that important, and a man willing to date said woman, then they deserve each other. I also have no problem with a man who's only measurement in worthiness is bra cup size. If there's a woman willing to date him, then go for it. I am married now, but if I were single, I would applaud these types of sites. It weeds out the bad ones for the rest of us that actuality want to find decent human beings and are not hung up on credi…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:29 PM
19

I just dont understand people that think so little about women as to degrade them to the point of believing that they can not and should not be able or allowed to think for themselves. Its appalling.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 06:09 PM
10

When my wife was trying to get pregnant, there were plenty of times when i didn't want to have sex, but she was...lets just say...adamant. She would go so far as to remove my pants forcibly, pin me against the wall and try to get me to penetrate her. Not sure if that counts, but there you go. Of course, if were using the modern day "if he asks and you say no, then says "please" it was a rape" definitions...then oh yeah, more times than i can count.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 07:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter