TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

im_not_bovvered Archive

View 1 post and 55 comments by im_not_bovvered on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
45

im_not_bovvered/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:38 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

I'm out at "use their pussy as a weapon." I'm saying you should be an adult and work through your issues and not be emotionally abusive to your partner by purposefully withholding sex OR threatening to cheat if you don't get it. Even if someone IS withholding sex, if there is a reason why, either get to the bottom of the reason or break up. I'm not saying they're justified in withholding sex from their partner (they might be if there is a legit worry/reason), but to say "I know you don't want to…
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:50 PM
0

I’ll call you on your bluff and go somewhere else for it. That's also saying "if you don't give me sex, I'm going somewhere else." That's coercion. People should give sex freely and never feel like unless they have sex their partner will leave them. If my partner and I are fighting and he wants to have sex anyway (or vice versa), and I don't, it's not just ok for him to go outside of the relationship because he doesn't get sex on demand. If lack of sex is a regular issue, there are other things …
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:25 PM
0

Yeah, I think that's fair, but I still think it sets a bad precedent to use sex as a weapon.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 09:22 PM
13

Withholding sex to "punish" someone or get them to do what you want is bad. To coerce someone into having sex with you by threatening to go elsewhere is also bad. Sex should never be used as a weapon in any way. It sounds like neither of you were probably great to each other on that front.
/r/MensRights14/09/21 05:53 PM
4

Come to San Diego. They're everywhere.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 05:47 AM
1

I'm not saying the ad was a good one, but ovarian cancer is often not talked about and is extremely lethal if not caught early, and often it's caught late. Patients don't recognize and doctors overlook symptoms because they often mimic other benign reproductive issues (like cysts, etc). Breast cancer is probably a good example of a cancer that gets a disproportionate amount of "attention" - and a lot of it is just for marketing and money making purposes (through the Komen Foundation), but ovaria…
/r/MensRights21/03/16 09:23 PM
6

The main points of their philosophy are right in their sidebar. One of their ideas is to treat all women as children because they are incapable of rational thought.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 04:32 AM
3

You didn't. TRP does.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 03:11 AM
7

Sure they're different. Should one be treated like a normal adult because they're rational and the other be treated like a child because they are incapable of logical thoughts simply based on sex? Different doesn't make one or the other superior, and isn't MensRights an egalitarian kind of group?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 01:25 AM
1

Taken seriously for doing what? Again, nothing stops women from providing for themselves. While that's true, are we going to completely ignore the fact that this isn't a black and white situation? Many married couples make the decision for the men to work and women to stay home and raise the children. In decisions made for the way the family will work, mutually by husband and wife, we can't ignore the fact that there are some families that purposely want the women to stay at home. Therefore, if …
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:43 PM
3

It is, but it's clearly used to be derogatory (on top of the point being made) and unnecessarily inflammatory.
/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:20 PM
3

I'm a woman and I'm a lurker. I've learned a lot from this sub and agree with you guys on a lot. However, I have noticed a bit of an uptick in what you're talking about. It's not so much that there are more not so great comments than there used to be, but that stuff is being upvoted more. There was a thread, not too long ago, where the term "pussy pass" was being thrown around all over the place - in almost every comment - and each comment was upvoted highly. If that doesn't sound like the red p…
/r/MensRights30/09/13 07:44 PM
1

I don't think anyone (man or woman) should open their door to a stranger in the middle of the night, especially if they're alone. It could be legit, but it also could be a set up for a robbery (either in that moment or they could be casing your house). If it's a person that needs help, the police should be able to help them. The police, in this case, ended up murdering the guy, which is why the officer is being charged. The fault lies with the police. That said, I think the real mens-rights conn…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:32 PM
12

I have a question as a female lurker: I was raped in college but I didn't make any accusation (though I know who did it) for various reasons. Does that mean, because I did not make a formal accusation and obtain a conviction, that I was not a "victim?" Seriously, what would you call me? I'm a victim but not an accuser. Maybe I fit into a gray area?
/r/MensRights17/09/13 10:01 PM
1

I would guess most women don't just wake up one day and decide their private parts are disgusting.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 11:03 PM
0

Right, because labiaplasty isn't a real thing and nobody ever throws around the term "beef curtains." Half of the comments in regard to the specific vulvas on the cover were discussing how gross they looked. Vulvas in porn look a certain way and many women never see other vulvas and realize theirs is normal.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 07:51 AM
1

Except for the topic of the article, which is valid and would be just as valid if the topic was about penises... Just because you don't think it's valid doesn't mean it's not a valid reason. Look at some of the comments in /r/wtf and even here, proving why that cover exists (a lot of "eww, gross looking vaginas!") when in fact, the pictures on that's magazine were totally normal and a representation of what normal women may have. It's also important because a lot of the female anatomy that peopl…
/r/MensRights24/08/13 05:32 AM
2

This isn't the oppression Olympics, and this specific topic is about the vulvas on the cover of the magazine. I wasn't aware that whenever ANY topic is discussed in this subreddit, both genders have to be discussed at all times. Where did anyone, myself included, deny that men also have to do certain things for porn? I was responding to "they don't photoshop every frame" in reference to the comment regarding female anatomy.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 08:17 PM
2

You realize one of the rationales for circumcision is that it's "neater" and more "attractive" not to have that flap of skin hanging off the end of a guy's dick. And wouldn't you say that's a problem as well? Or are you saying that's okay and just a "vanity" issue that should just be the problem of men?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:52 PM
-1

They don't go photoshop every frame. No, but they have labiaplasty and are required to keep their pubic hair a certain way.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:44 PM
1

I'm a child free woman and I think it's better you tell people upfront. Yes, you might get negative reactions, but why would you want a relationship with women who might possibly want children in the future? Someone who wants kids and a child free person are not compatible - better find that out upfront. It's one of the most important things you and your partner should agree on. I'm married and my husband is adamantly child free as well, and we discovered that about each other immediately at the…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:29 AM
1

This is less about gender and more about sexuality. This case is because she is gay. I think the proper question should be if both involved in the relationship were gay men, would there be push to free the older guy? I think the answer would be yes. People aren't pushing to free this girl because she's female - they're pushing to free her because it's pretty clear it was a vindictive move by anti-gay parents of the younger girl. Chances are, if she had been a 17 year old guy who turned 18, the p…
/r/MensRights22/05/13 07:42 PM
0

I understand that each side has segregated time slots, but children are a little different of a story, especially when this child only has one parent. Exceptions are usually made for children, which is why adults are allowed to take their small children - of either gender - into the bathroom with them, etc. Just because this also affects women (who have a case in their own right and presumably would be affected in the same way if a single mother wanted to watch over her son) doesn't mean that th…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:40 PM
0

Please explain to me how this religious issue doesn't become a gender problem when the sole reason a father cannot be around his daughter swimming is because men (in a secular society - it's not like this is a Muslim club) cannot be around girls in bathing suits.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 07:14 PM
1

He also likened women who don't like children to dogs that eat their own shit.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:10 AM
3

"I don't think women understand enough about the penis to realise what they are really doing to their sons." While I don't disagree with you, many fathers are also involved in these decisions. Where are they speaking up?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 06:46 PM
1

It's ridiculous - other places have laws similar to this. They're so police can "nail" sex workers, which just makes both the workers and their clients unsafe and exposed to so many diseases if they are foregoing condoms due to fear of arrest. It's maddening really.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 05:46 PM
1

It would be interesting, but SRS and Feminism =! women's rights.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:14 PM
1

"This also should extend to girls who stay home from school with the claim of abnormal periods which interfere with the ability to perform everyday actions. The same standard of medical documentation should be required for this as for any other malady." As a woman, I would have no problem providing documentation from a doctor. However, periods don't have to be "abnormal" to be completely crippling - some people are just blessed with awful periods (that are still medically considered within the r…
/r/MensRights06/03/13 06:09 PM
1

"Male objectification follows a different pattern. Men are not objectified as much for how they look (though they are! last week there was a post about heightism and how men are less likely to be dated by women if they are short, unless they earn more money.) but are objectified more for 'what they can do'. By this I mean men are viewed as utilities, 'is he handy?', 'what does he do?', 'oooh, he's a doctor?' that kind of thing." I don't disagree with you, but wasn't there just a big long thread …
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:45 PM
1

I don't understand the giddy-ness of people wanting women to be potentially drafted. I get the desire for equality but I wouldn't wish the draft on anyone. In fact, if my husband were drafted I would move him out of the country to dodge it. I would rather repeal having anybody have to sign up at all.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 04:03 AM
3

Look, I'm a lady and I think the argument is as stupid as they come. Whatever your penis size, embrace it. Different strokes for different folks, but as long as it's functional, I see no problem regardless of size. I personally think most women really don't care (unless it's too big, and then it's a pain issue). My husband entered our relationship always asking me if he was good enough size wise and no amount of me telling him he's perfect is enough. It seems like boys/teenagers also influence e…
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:48 PM
1

Unless the company is over 55 employees, there is no guaranteed maternity leave either in the US. I agree though. We should have parental leave in this country and let the couple decide themselves who should stay with the child.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 03:06 AM
2

RISUG would also take $$ away from pharmaceutical companies, and cash is king - in the US anyway.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 03:12 PM
2

Well I don't think you should approach a dumb idea or point of view (circumcision is better because uncut dicks look icky) with a weak argument. If you really want to change minds, I think the best approach is to discuss body autonomy and the incidents of botched circumcisions.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 11:14 PM
4

To be honest, I'm against circumcision, but I've never been able to tell the difference between ribbed condoms or regular. Also, my husband is circumcised and I prefer no condom to ribbed condom. I agree with you guys about the issue, but I'm not sure that's the best argument to use in changing someone's mind.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 10:17 PM
4

News to me - woman here and I married a "nice guy." Guess I missed that boat! Whoops!
/r/MensRights25/01/13 09:38 PM
1

My husband and I do exactly the same thing! Glad to hear it plants seeds for a happy marriage!
/r/MensRights18/01/13 03:28 AM
4

I hold the door open for everyone, man or woman. Letting it slam in anyone's face is kind of rude. IMO.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 02:37 AM
1

I hear what you're saying, and while I agree, I think a more noble goal would be to go the opposite direction and instead of work on having women added, work to eliminate the draft all together.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:59 PM
3

Nobody should be forced. The draft is awful.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:35 PM
13

She really did want a boy (as explained to me later) but yeah, the drugs made her blurt it out. Of course, she thinks it's hilarious today and that's why she told me the story (it is kind of funny). She's an amazing mother though, so it's ok :-)
/r/MensRights06/01/13 03:02 AM
58

Well, I'm female and both my mother and father wanted a boy. My mom had a c-section and when she woke up, after they told her I was a girl, her first words were "but I wanted a boy." It cuts both ways, but I don't think it's indicative of how someone will care for their actual child once it arrives.
/r/MensRights05/01/13 10:16 PM
1

I'm pretty sure my insurance premiums add up to a whole lot more than what I use throughout the year, including on birth control. I guess after paying $2,400 a year for insurance, I'd hope to get $500-600 dollars of contraception for "free." How am I getting any kind of a "free ride?"
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:25 AM
1

I'm a woman and I welcome the day your hormones can be just as messed up by contraception as ours! Seriously, I cannot wait until there is a solution that allows men to control their own fertility. Maybe in the next 10 years?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:21 AM
2

My step dad's Viagra is covered through Medicare (I hate that I know that).
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:01 AM
2

I'm a woman, married, and have always paid for my own condoms. My husband and I trade off. Am I in the minority? Every female friend I've ever had who was sexually active has had a condom stash too.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 05:42 AM
4

"The woman frowning at him in disgust (and we have to wonder why, nothing he was doing could be taken as the least bit disgusting), cringing, trying as hard as she can with her body language to define him as 'creepy'." I just figured the beer was probably spilling out of the full cup a bit and probably was getting on her since he was sort of leaning over her.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:03 PM
2

You sound like a really angry person and it honestly sounds like you really don't like women at all, much less want to understand anything about them.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:33 AM
7

I wear glasses and one day I was walking down the street in midtown Manhattan... My prescription was way old and I couldn't see well. I was squinting pretty hard to see the walk sign to cross the street and got YELLED at by a construction worker for not smiling. I was trying to not get hit by a car for crying out loud.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:40 AM
1

"More often than not, it's the woman that pulls the plug." Source?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:35 AM
1

Because if the child has two parents, both parents should pay to care for that child. Child support isn't about the parents - it's about caring for the kid whether they're physically with you or not. As I said, if a father has custody, the mother should have to pay for the child. Child support is for the best interest of the child. Not a father with custody situation, but my sister in law had the shit beaten out of her by her ex husband over time which finally ended their marriage after 10 years…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:17 AM
1

The issue is not with child support. If one parent has custody of the child, they should receive child support FOR the child. The issue is with division of custody in the first place. In too many cases, it is biased against the father, which needs to be changed. If fathers were rewarded custody, they too should receive child support from the mother.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:33 PM
1

"Put yourself in her shoes. Marriage seem like a better deal now?" Comments like this imply that women marry because of what they can get during the marriage and in divorce. The point is that it doesn't always happen, and the same messed up system can screw over women. I acknowledge that men often get the short end of the stick in family law, but there are implications all over the place in this thread that women marry because of what they can get out of it after a divorce. I can't tell you how …
/r/MensRights06/12/12 10:31 PM
-1

I understand the discontent about the skewed system, but this whole "women marry men only for their money and stuff!" is overly used. My husband and I got married when we were both flat broke (and he had about 3x the amount of student loans that I have), so we both dove into the other end of the spectrum! I know, anecdotal, but we're not the only ones that marry for love or who, if we were to divorce, would have a fairly equitable situation when dividing stuff up.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 08:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter