TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

imbetterthanyou30 Archive

View 0 posts and 55 comments by imbetterthanyou30 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Anyone who is upset by film awards and thinks it makes a statement on governmental structure and societal cohesion needs to get a fucking life. Any life. I don't care if it's $0.99 at CVS. You buy that life, you put it in a bag, and you get that life.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 06:47 PM
1

This is rape.
/r/MensRights24/01/24 03:22 AM
3

No, we don't. Imagine if a woman could have a man thrown in jail because he deceived her by lying about his income, occupation, and other pufferies when "spitting game" at the bar. That is a Pandora's box (giggity) you don't want to open.
/r/MensRights15/01/24 09:28 AM
7

For people who don't need men, it sure as hell seems like they need me to react to their worthless opinions.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 08:00 AM
3

God I can't wait for the conservative states to pass laws against lifelong alimony. Men get treated like crap by the family court system.
/r/MensRights26/12/23 03:11 PM
2

No.
/r/MensRights13/12/23 11:17 PM
33

I think there are some wins happening, but it'll occur gradually over time. For example, some states are now seeking to end lifelong alimony. Moreover, people are starting to wake up as to how damaging DEI is-- which I think has played a significant role in the hatred of men generally. It'll take time, but things will change.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 01:04 AM
1

In my criminal law class (in law school), some people said that consent can be withdrawn later and it be called rape. The example was a spouse who cheated and later had sex with his wife; is that rape? They argued it was because she wouldn't have consented if she knew about the affair. This was law school. The professor, thankfully, explained to them how it wasn't rape. But he did pose an interesting question about whether hiding an STD from a consenting partner was assault. I said it was. He as…
/r/MensRights12/12/23 12:44 AM
2

I don't think male suicide can be boiled down to something as simple as "they don't open up." In fact, many men don't open up because they tried doing that before. Maybe they did open up before and a woman abused that knowledge by gossiping (that's actually how women typically manifest aggression). It could also be that men are experiencing financial problems and can't get a loan. It could be a lot of things. But I don't think it's because men fail to convey emotion. I suspect the real crux is t…
/r/MensRights02/12/23 05:57 AM
17

Wow. The hyperlink to the description of her book in the article read, "Will the Sixth Wave of feminism need to fix the men, if it wants to fix the women?" Lol fuck off hag.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 01:24 PM
2

People focus on a specific issue because it is important to them, but it doesn't invalidate other issues. I wouldn't view men's rights groups as antithetical to women's rights groups any more than I would think breast cancer groups are antithetical to testicular cancer groups. Consider this: If you go to a breast cancer group and say testicular cancer is terrible, they will agree. If you go to a testicular cancer group and say breast cancer is terrible, they will agree. Consider similarly: If yo…
/r/MensRights01/12/23 05:44 AM
1

Note how the article doesn't report what they ACTUALLY said. They don't even vaguely describe what they said. It's just all supposition and conclusions without any sort of facts behind it whatsoever. I smell BS.
/r/MensRights01/12/23 04:47 AM
0

Knock her teeth out. Women who act this way need to be humbled by way of a proper beating. The only reason they strike a man is because they feel safe in doing so. Give them a reality check.
/r/MensRights11/10/23 06:18 AM
1

It's Buzzfeed. They're the absolute scum of media. They make Fox News and CNN look like saints. I'm actually annoyed that I clicked on that article without realizing it was them. I'll never be able to take back that +1 to their click rate . . . damn.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 11:07 PM
3

Correct, because no one cares.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 10:24 PM
1

I either grit my teeth and power through or pay professionals to help me.
/r/MensRights05/10/23 04:44 AM
1

My pleasure.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 05:33 AM
2

That is indeed a core MGTOW principle. I like the movement because (1) it's organic; (2) it's nuanced; and (3) it doesn't vilify the other side (though there's reasons to). This makes it difficult for the other side to assail other than insulting MGTOW folks, because the central theme of it is personal choice. But the attack fails because it justifies the individuals decision to identify as MGTOW and the insulation that going your own way offers is not to care about the perceptions and opinions …
/r/MensRights30/09/23 02:04 AM
2

Yes. In-line with the War Games approach: In 2013, there was a computer that was programmed to play Tetris. It did well, but it started falling behind because it couldn't predict moves beyond the couple that were in cue. On the last frame before defeat, the program did something the programmers didn't expect- it paused the game. The program determined that, because it couldn't win, the only logical move was to stop the game and not continue playing. It might not win, but it wouldn't lose.
/r/MensRights30/09/23 01:59 AM
1

You're welcome to here. I'm gay. I often point out to trans-advocates that if male/female has no meaning and it's just whatever anyone feels like, then how would they describe what being gay is? I can't see male genitals to tell gender, sure. But I've never been surprised in bed. And if I was, I wouldn't have sex. If that makes me trans phobic, does being gay make me a misogynist? Their rhetoric has gotten out of control. It used to be with gay people "you love who you love," and they somehow tu…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 02:34 AM
1

It's because people are sexist in this way, and it isn't confined to women. I encourage all men to use sufficient physical force to stop the assault. I did it once (high school), and she was shocked. She didn't try it again. Even gave her grace and said she better not slap me again. She did, and I smacked her back. She said, "You're not supposed to hit girls!" Ladies, if you're only hitting a guy because you think you're safe, then you're mistaken. Once you initiate physical assault on someone, …
/r/MensRights29/09/23 02:28 AM
28

Fixes have to be in-line with their typical behavior. MGTOW actually has it right in my book. It's organic, it's nuanced, and it doesn't villify the other side. It just says, "If that's the game, I'm not playing. I'm gonna do my own thing." The fact that such a movement inspires rage from the other side rather than compassion is telling insofar that it demonstrates that we can't fix it through typical means. And what is remarkable is that, with that kind of withdraw from society, most actually D…
/r/MensRights29/09/23 01:56 AM
1

Yeah, it really sucks. I got reported for sexual harassment because I had a political disagreement. I make a quarter million a year- no way I'm risking that salary ever again by daring to disagree with a woman. I'd rather be accused of being a loner. Oh, by the way, I'm a gay, married man. I told HR that when I was informed of the sexual harassment allegation. They said, "Thanks for telling us that, but it's irrelevant."
/r/MensRights28/09/23 02:35 PM
2

Thank you, and welcome to the group. It's very nice to have woman advocate. You have no idea how much it means to men. We respect the level of understanding you have for us, and we welcome you without any ill intent.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 07:48 PM
1

The quote you mentioned isn't worth your time and attention. There is a way to explain this so that it is true. But to what purpose would this observation serve? Depending on how it is explained, it seems to either state a general truth (not worth responding to) or to promote a conclusion. In case of the latter, that conclusion is what should be attacked as opposed to an untrue premise when possible.
/r/MensRights24/09/23 07:27 PM
2

I think that's a fine mentality as a suit of mental armor and model behavior after it. And I don't say that sarcastically. I view all women as a potential threat-- especially the ones who dress nice and wear heavy make-up (because they indicate they're hyper aware of images and perception). However, it's important to keep in the back of the brain that it's not the objective, empirical truth. In so doing, I am able to retain the few friendships with women I have that are genuine. Primarily becaus…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 11:47 PM
1

I've followed ShoeOnHead for years. Way back when she was first dating Armored Skeptic. They BOTH ragged on feminism for a long time. Shoot, Shoe's been doing it for over 10 years. My guy, you are painting in too broad strokes and snagging good people-- just like a lot of women do.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 10:33 PM
1

I would file an HR complaint against her and keep a back-up job lined up. What she said about you being nice to her must mean you want to be romantically involved with her is the same kind of sexism as "She's only working here so she can buy more shoes and make-up." Tell HR working around her makes you uncomfortable. Then, you have a basis for not wanting to work with her and disparate treatment that is predicated on her specifically as opposed to it later being inferred that you just hate women…
/r/MensRights22/09/23 10:23 PM
1

When someone makes a claim, it's on the person to prove the claim (not the other person to disprove it). This is because one should not believe something unless there is sufficient evidence. Hitchen's Razor suggests that if something cannot be proven through reason and experimentation, it isn't worth discussing. For those who believe things without evidence, the adage applies "What one has not be reasoned into, they cannot be reasoned out of." There is a rather tricky technique that I find very …
/r/MensRights22/09/23 10:04 PM
29

No. I mind my own business.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 09:20 PM
12

This is the correct comment. I will add for consideration: How is it that the outcome is 100% correlated to the desires of men as if women are completely subject to the whims of the male opposing party? (Hint: It's not--see response above me)
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:31 PM
1

If you don't have to deal with it, then don't. If you try to correct everyone who has an incorrect opinion, you'll be spending a lot of your time trying to convince people who don't want to be convinced. It's very rare to change someone's mind- especially if they use emotions to guide themselves to the conclusions that they want. This isn't just true of feminism, but topics in general. For example, with law, a lot of people are against letting people accused of awful crimes go on "technicalities…
/r/MensRights21/09/23 05:17 PM
1

Taking the feminist definition of "patriarchy," no. There is no patriarchy in the USA. It's a myth.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 04:01 AM
9

Working in a corporate environment with women.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 03:45 AM
1

This shit makes no sense. They arbitrarily classify a "peer group" as a specific demographic without justification. And they also assert, without qualification, what makes it "easier." Does easier mean 'more convincingly,' 'less stressfully,' etc.? But their examples eliminate these kinds of questions because their examples are simply not true however they wish to frame it. People criticize across demographics. The poor criticize the rich, women criticize men, etc.
/r/MensRights21/09/23 02:40 AM
1

Fem-cels.
/r/MensRights17/09/23 05:58 PM
1

What value does she add to your life? If none, disown her and don't speak to her ever again. There's no reason to associate with people just because they're blood.
/r/MensRights15/09/23 03:20 AM
1

Yes. Leftist influencers are beginning to talk about men's suffering, but in reaction to strong masculine figureheads like Andrew Tate and Jordan Peterson. My guess is they'll soon start pandering under the guise of care when they actually don't want further numbers driven to the right, but they have vilified white men in no small measure themselves. Please don't assume a political leaning on my part. I'm just stating what appears to me to be the reality. I don't care for political labels, just …
/r/MensRights30/08/23 05:14 AM
1

The way you achieve justice is through the courts. Suing for defamation is in the civil realm of courts. One solution is for DA's to prosecute the liars. But it's difficult to prove mens rea (intent) without tangible evidence.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 07:06 PM
5

I'm not interested in helping women succeed. I'm interested in helping the people around me that I care about succeed. So, thanks, but no thanks.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:57 AM
1

You're personalizing this. Women make false accusations. I was the subject of one less than a month ago . . . I'm gay. And it didn't matter. Oh, and for the record, I work a job making ~$250,000 a year. I'm not risking that job so that I can be falsely accused again. No one needs to say that sexual harassment/assault is bad. We all know that. What needs to be said is how absolutely, 100% devastating it is to be falsely accused. You lose everything, and a lot of people kill themselves. Men's suic…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:48 AM
2

Found the feminist.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:38 AM
2

"I don't wanna open the door for accusations." (Immediately proceeds to literally open a door.)
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:36 AM
1

Same. I resolved that if I got even the slightest whiff of being a democrat, I avoid them. It's just not safe. And I WAS a democrat up until about a year ago.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:31 AM
2

Another gay man here. For your first question, I just act normal. Considering most men aren't gay, you just kinda assume all men are off the table. Social apps (like Grindr) or gay bars were the watering hole. I'm married, so I don't need to even worry about it anymore. For your second question, the dynamic doesn't change. Others may have a different experiences, but I don't advertise that I'm gay or make it a part of my core identity. It's just one small aspect about me. I avoid revealing my se…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:26 AM
3

I'm gay too, and I feel the same way. I was falsely accused of sexual harassment towards a female. Wanna know what HR said when I told them I was a married gay man? "Thank you for telling us that, but it doesn't matter." Yeah, me being gay doesn't matter in the context of sexually harassing women, apparently. Be careful.
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:23 AM
3

Yep. I had a political disagreement with one and was reported to HR on a lie. HR didn't bother to ask any of the other 12 people who were present for the conversation and bastardized me. Fortunately, no further action (so I'm told). But you better believe I am going to be 100% sterile, robotic, and "professional" at work. No stories, no personal exchanges, no political talk-- not jack shit. I make a shit ton of money at this job, left the military to try and get it, and it took 6 years to get th…
/r/MensRights20/08/23 08:13 AM
5

"He makes 5x more than I do, but doesn't do anything." That's admirable if true, but I suspect the complainant "strains credulity."
/r/MensRights15/08/23 07:13 PM
3

Poor guy
/r/MensRights13/08/23 04:57 PM
1

I do have a quick question for you: Do you think the Barbie movie portray men as inferior to women?
/r/MensRights13/08/23 12:57 AM
1

Try being a woman? Ok. I identify as a woman now. (Waits 20 seconds). Ok, I tried it. You're full of crap. I as a woman didn't feel afraid. I'm a man now.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 12:51 AM
1

No he won't. Military can't sue the government. But he may have a claim against the accuser, though it'd be difficult to win.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 06:54 PM
22

My advice? Go to a museum. It allows you to engage or disengage with great fluidity, it tells you about the person's ability to appreciate other things, their curiosity, and it's memorable. Plus, it's pretty darn cheap. Alternatively, you can go to the park for a walk and feed the birds. To me, the value isn't in the activity, but in learning about your potential mate.
/r/MensRights12/08/23 05:44 PM
3

Yeah the penile cancer reduction is the only actual medical benefit. But as mentioned, it's quite rare and only marginally helps. Everything else is either a religious reason, misconception, or "tradition" reason. It is more painful for an adult to get the circumcision, but I think the boy who will grow into a man should be afforded that choice rather than having someone else permanently make it for them. It's quite easy to volunteer permanent body alterations when it's not your body. Also, it r…
/r/MensRights12/08/23 08:30 AM
7

When removing functional, normal body parts, we should not ask the benefits of keeping it. Instead, the question should be why should we remove this body part? And here, there is no reason whatsoever. There's no medical benefit to it at all (other than a very slight reduction in penile cancer, which is an exceedingly rare illness anyway). Honestly, it makes more sense for appendix removal of all infants. There's about a 10% chance people get appendicitis. And it's not a necessary organ. So why d…
/r/MensRights12/08/23 08:21 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter