TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

imdrinkingteaatwork Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by imdrinkingteaatwork on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm sorry, but you're a joke of a person.
/r/MensRights20/11/16 05:14 PM
3

Did you Just compare a random erection to menstruation?z
/r/MensRights20/11/16 06:15 AM
-4

Anyone that considers "men's rights" something that needs its own subreddit.
/r/MensRights08/08/16 03:09 AM
1

That whole comment is hyperbole.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:16 PM
1

They don't need it. Just like psychiatrists don't need FDA approval to use SSRIs for those with obsessive compulsive disorder. It's called off-label usage.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 01:58 AM
3

That is not true. You are misconstruing things. And you don't know what you are talking about. Gender dysphoria and gender non-conformity are different things. Gender Dysphoria is not often a stage you grow out of, in fact I don't think it ever is. Children that are gender non-conforming do sometimes change and live as the sex assigned at birth. As for puberty suppressers, no; they are not dangerous. And those are the "hormones" in question. The article makes mistakes and you are just believing …
/r/MensRights25/07/16 12:33 AM
1

You are a weird person. Will you please comment with a picture of yourself. I need to know.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:27 PM
1

I clarified, yet you continue to misrepresent me. And you call me insane? The same person who has posted the same collection of links over 30 times? What is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:06 PM
1

Do you ever comment without copying and pasting?
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:56 PM
1

I am a white male living in Newark, New Jersey... but you were close. And I am not a troll.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:45 PM
0

I'm fine with the forced career-ing. What, the actual fuck. You can't be real. Are you trolling me? You made up a hypothetical, not based in reality, and I did not flinch at its proposal. I called your stupid bluff. The selection of careers has no representation on whether or not men are oppressed because the reasoning for them having such jobs is based in the social hierarchy itself. At which males are historically at the top, as a class. Sure, just suggest how women will be paying men back as …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:35 PM
0

That's only the next assumption if your brain says "Women are incapable of consent and lack any agency whatsoever", My brain does say that, as neurologically it is a fact. Free will does not exist. Do I need to cite neurological studies for that too? Or can you accept the world of neuroscience at its word? Someone who believes Sex is rape, which is apparently something you believe. I literally clarified what I believe in the section you quoted. Your attempt at disproving me with degradation and …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:24 PM
0

I've read much in feminist research No you haven't. and I've seen even more feminist behavior. No you haven't. But I get it, you can copy and paste. In means nothing to me.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:01 PM
1

"Facial Attractiveness"? Why would such a study prove your case? Gives credence to objectification theory and how sexual selection works. You can't just link to studies (many by feminists) and go "YEP THIS MAKE ME RIGHT" without explaining WHY. You told me peer reviewed, so I gave you what you wanted. You do realize I presented studies in the same way you linked to statistics? Nevertheless, the thesis of each study was available in the abstract explaining how evolutionary biology is linked to op…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 04:49 PM
1

You mean the wars for resources to keep their families alive, you mean the mines from which we extracted metals, one of the PRIME capabilities that advanced humanity past the stone age? Yeah men did do that, women could just as easily have asked for the right to die in those mines. Except they couldn't... because they were forced to submit implicitly and explicitly. Women have been able to work in any occupation for over 100 years. They CHOOSE the careers they go into, if they were truly being k…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 02:56 PM
0

Holy shit, you're one of those "Heterosexual sex is rape" people aren't you. I am. Though, it is more complicated than that. I say all sexuality is inherently coerced. And this is male domination how? Well... the logical next assumption would be that multiple males would be having sex with the same female, and, like it many other mammals, the sex is very forced. That would indicate that the sex doing the forcing would be dominating. You listed a bunch of ways MEN COMPETE (AS ANIMALS) WITH EACH O…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:18 AM
1

I'm fine with the forced career-ing. How about no draft at all. The right to reproduce without the burden of pregnancy. The necessity for climax during intra-vaginal sex for reproduction to occur (ignoring for the moment the small chance of pre-ejaculate sperm viability).
/r/MensRights16/05/16 01:08 AM
1

Men did not invent death, they didn't invent falling boulders and they didn't invent mine collapses. The hell are you talking about? Yet weren't they the ones that decided to fight wars and mine mines? Did they ever FIGHT to be in the fields, do they even NOW DEMAND TO BE PUT INTO THE DANGEROUS FIELDS MEN ARE IN? I don't know on the first one, regardless it proves nothing if they did not want to fight wars, and if they wanted males to continue fighting it is just based on the already accepted co…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:55 AM
1

I want honest, peer reviewed studies not paragraphs on a site that mass edited by feminists. Smh. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-011-9987-3#/page-1 https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=i4nZc0myxjAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA269&dq=evolution+sexuality+feminism&ots=NQnuhLlBSV&sig=IqNL0m-bQsgKZpwjVT9Cls6H7qU#v=onepage&q=evolution%20sexuality%20feminism&f=false https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=i4nZc0myxjAC&oi=fnd&pg=PA296&dq=evolution+sexuality+feminism&ots=NQnuhLlBSV&sig=R1yCB0…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:42 AM
1

Can you send me a picture of what you look like, it's killing me not knowing.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:32 AM
0

Says the person who gave no evidence. If it is so clear, why can't you produce any? I gave quite a bit actually. What more do you need? What about the biological dominance of males is not covered in the Wikipedia page on sexual dimorphism? Did you not see the part about how heightened levels of testosterone in the brain reflect domination? Did you not see how the mechanism of vaginal reproduction is by it's very nature forceful and dominant. The penis head is theorized to be shaped as such as a …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:18 AM
0

while women have the unique capability of birth. Interesting how you have been describing with great deal the ills of man, yet birth you label with this kind of euphemism. I guess clearly we're all oppressed by women because I can acknowledge that men/women are different and Wikipedia has articles on Matriarchy. Except the differences between men and women never kept men subjugated for centuries upon centuries and biologically no matriarchal structure exists. So no, you cannot. Wikipedia is not …
/r/MensRights16/05/16 12:00 AM
1

My facts show that men had obvious downsides throughout history, That was never contested. You have no facts not a single one. Yep.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 11:33 PM
0

When the subject is the complexities of social systems and the mechanism and consequences of evolution I think it is perfectly acceptable.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 09:05 PM
1

anddd cites no evidence You're worse than the other person. If you are going to chime in can you at least try to keep up? Lol, because protecting and defending physically frail women at the expense of male life is total subjugation...of men. Yeah.... Jesus you are a nutter. How about you turn off that computer for a while (made by white males btw) and "toss off your shackles" by going to live alone in a forest somewhere. Nothing is stopping you except your inability to survive without men to pum…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:38 PM
0

Open your eyes. Edit: Overwhelmed by facts that don't relate, yes. Logic? no. Insult? yes. Shame? no. Deflect? No. They are legitimately bad at arguing as none of their points connect cohesively to what they are trying to imply.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 08:28 PM
-2

Are you denying millennia male dominance? Yes, do you have any evidence to prove that "Males dominated" and that it wasn't a system of equivalent exchange? Biologically, socially, and physically the evidence is clear. A system of equivalent exchange is an odd way to describe a prototypical example of a dominant/submissive relationship. So it could just as fairly be said that women don't love their children. They do it only to ensure their genes survive. Are you even human? Yes and yes. Jesus Chr…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:17 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism#Humans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_dimorphism_in_non-human_primates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_selection https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mate_choice https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_humans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_differences_in_psychology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_%28ethology%29 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Androcentrism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarchy These links can be a start. Th…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 05:03 PM
1

You are really bad at arguing. Especially when your facts don't quite reflect what you want them to mean.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:55 PM
-1

I'll get to the rest in the morning. But I hope I never have to meet you. You really are an absolute dunce.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 06:27 AM
0

Yeah... because your stupendous analogy is sure to when a Nobel for literature.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:41 AM
1

Oh wow, look at all that evidence you gave! OH. There is none, because you're so full of shit it's leaking out of your mouth. Are you denying millennia male dominance? So it could just as fairly be said that women don't love their children. They do it only to ensure their genes survive. Are you even human? Yes and yes. During which time: they fed, protected, and provided for them. That system is what made humanity strong. Yes. But that does not mean it was not oppressive. The two are not mutuall…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:31 AM
1

Gotcha, you believe men are evil and only did this to hurt women. You're a bigot. Nuff said. Baseless accusations. Please build a house with all that straw. I get it, you hate feminism, cool. But, You've given no evidence, this is all just your bigoted conjecture. what bigoted conjecture are you even talking about? You're give no reason why letting countless men die for no other reason than some bigoted woman (i.e. Feminist Emmeline Pankhurst) giving them a feather and calling them cowards. What…
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:21 AM
1

I did not realize people like you were real. I mean I did, but just wow. It's so odd that you can bring up a thing like history, but completely ignore the historical dominance of one sex over the other. Just wow.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:11 AM
0

You should not talk.
/r/MensRights15/05/16 02:01 AM
-3

You see all of these clear truths and still can't process the thought of female privilege, and insist men are privileged historically. Because that is how systemic oppression of one class over another works? I don't even know what you are trying to argue. You're like saying, "men have had bad things happen in x, y, and z so the historical subjugation of women doesn't mean anything!" Sorry, but that is not how gender politics works. One sex has literally been DOMINANT over the other, and being pa…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:45 PM
-6

you're ignoring the male perspective. I most certainly am not. Male privilege does not mean the absence of disadvantage, or no advantage for females. Do you remember how my first comment was about not understanding what privilege is? Men were the ones dying to protect them. Look at men biologically, they are built to take a beating. The actual bones in the face of men shows to be designed to take a punch. By general rule of natural selection that's proof nearly all of the pain and trauma in soci…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 10:02 PM
-8

It may be a privilege, if this oversimplified definition of privilege needs to stick, but it is not privilege in any sociological sense. Proof of male privilege is hundreds of thousands of years of dominance and advantage. Control and power are exhibited socially, hierarchically, sexually, and even biologically. The correlation between gender roles and dominance/submission are in and of themselves proof of male privilege.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:52 PM
-7

Yes.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 09:38 PM
-12

An infographic I made for my school paper where I show how little I know about the concept of privilege.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 08:03 PM
1

It's nonsense that they think it is shameful that a guilty rapist would have a tarnished career. Why are you going through all my comments?
/r/MensRights02/12/15 04:59 AM
0

Nowhere am I saying they are. The person before me commented that, Whether she's lying or not it's still going to completely tarnish at least one of them and I think that's a shame. That is nonsense.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 11:42 PM
-14

Whether she's lying or not it's still going to completely tarnish at least one of them and I think that's a shame. In what world is a rapists career being tarnished shameful?
/r/MensRights29/11/15 10:11 PM
0

It was in the comments: I did not say women are designed for pregnancy. The reason we have a vagina is because if we are pregnant, the baby can come out. It’s the physical function of the vagina. There is no other way for the baby to come out than through the vagina, that’s the way it is, it’s natural. Biology ordered it that way. On the other hand, PIV isn’t natural, it’s an action done by men to us. They can choose not to do it, it isn’t necessary. There are many other ways of becoming pregnan…
/r/MensRights02/01/14 05:25 AM
0

Penetration of the penis into the vagina is completely unnecessary for conception. Only if you live in a society that solely practices in vitro fertilisation! See, that is where you are wrong. All that is necessary for conception is for the sperm to meet the egg. Vaginal intercourse is not a prerequisite, teh author even talked about how simply ejaculating on the vulva gets the job done. The question is when [and why] did vaginal intercourse become the most normative way for reproduction to occu…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:40 PM
0

But other feminists do share this opinion. Andrea Dworkin wrote an entire book on the subject. She does not go as far as calling it "rape" but she does deem sexual intercourse as a propagation of the patriarchal system. Even labeling it "rape" is just a semantic argument, the word would have to be redefined to make it more inclusive anyway. That being said I don't feel like the author is giving anecdotal evidence at all, nor are her assertions moronic. It has nothing to do with any one man being…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 03:35 AM
1

So the original comment talks about how queer it is that a feminist "could know so much" about her the commenter. You called that solipsism. I extrapolated that you consider the notion that "one knows the intricate feelings, emotions, etc of someone they have never met" solipsism, which is not even close to what solipsism entails. That [what you are implying] to me just sounds like a textbook narcissistic feeling of self-regard and self-regard. I should note, I think the original commenter gets …
/r/MensRights29/12/13 04:54 PM
1

I just meant your usage of solipsism in general. It sounds like you are equating solipsism to run of the mill narcissism.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 07:30 AM
1

I hope you are joking... but I can't tell. :(
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:32 AM
0

For some (and I would probably throw the author in that camp) that is definitely the case, but not always. In fact, I am male, and I agree with the main crux of the blog. It, also, takes away the legitimacy from people who are truly raped. I would disagree entirely. A home-run does not become any less of a home-run because another batter hit one further.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:26 AM
1

The author also mentions ejaculating on the vulva, which is a viable method.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:22 AM
1

The author definitely touches on that...
/r/MensRights28/12/13 07:19 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter