TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

imnotjamesbrown Archive

View 0 posts and 19 comments by imnotjamesbrown on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It is necessary now for the progress of our society. Women are now and have been a vital part of many many intellectual discussions, and you cannot change that or make that go away. Our society absolutely needs the input of 51% of the population in order to move forward. I reject the idea that half of the world's population should be disregarded, as that is just completely asinine and useless. Your OPINION, "Civilization existed perfectly fine for centuries without women involved in many of thes…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/13 04:09 PM
1

lol yeah, on that note, how do you redpill dudes feel about female bears? new subreddit in the works?
/r/TheRedPill03/07/13 03:05 PM
1

thinkin' with the peepee, way to be bro!
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 04:10 PM
2

stay classy
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 04:09 PM
1

Okay, show me some numbers! I'm truly interested to read further on this. Edit (hours later): aannnnnnd you're showing me nothing. Not surprised.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 04:05 PM
2

Way to respond after saying there was no reason to- want to have a last word battle? Because it seems like that is what we're doing. P.S. you're doing that thing where you turn to insults to "end" an argument. That's cute.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 04:01 PM
1

ditto
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 04:00 PM
1

Women are not just "matching men fairly closely in academia." You sound like you just got out of a time machine. "The male-female ratio in higher education has been steadily moved in favor of the females ever since the 1970s. Total enrollment figures show that females outnumbered their male counterparts for the first time in the late 1970s, and they have steadily increased their numerical advantage ever since. The superiority first came in public universities, but soon private universities saw f…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 03:53 PM
0

Ok people, if you are going to use this one "smart girl" you know as an example- please look beyond the basic facts- generally speaking, a person who is very talented with mathematics is a "numbers person"- just because someone is very skilled in one academic area absolutely does not guarantee that he or she will be skilled in any other areas, including debate.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 03:44 PM
2

Come on! "Women lack this inherent intellectual curiosity" What are you basing this HUGE claim on? Do you actually believe ALL women lack an inherent intellectual curiosity? That sounds like something my senile grandfather told me.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 03:41 PM
1

So women aren't "people?" Yes there are inherent biological differences, but you're actually saying that women were never part of that "truism" you speak of? And are you saying my point is null because "nobody really disagrees with it" ? Are you serious? Isn't something that "everybody agrees with" generally taken to be a fact or at least a strong theory- that's how peer review works. You end up using vague general statements and insults that seem to be based on your individual experience to bac…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 03:34 PM
0

That is a completely ridiculous comparison- children cannot legally drive for many valid reasons, including physical and mental incapabilities that they will later develop as adults. I never said anything about misogyny or hatred- you sound desperate bringing those words into play. I mean do you have any idea that millions of women attend/teach at/lead universities/grad schools/med schools/law schools, write scholarly papers, books, text books, articles, etc.? This means that these women are a v…
/r/TheRedPill02/07/13 03:31 PM
1

You're kind of being an elitist asshole, though, that's the thing about your post. You are saying all women are unable to participate in intellectual conversations- that is an extremely elitist statement. If you are going to say it, stand by it, goddamit.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 07:46 PM
3

Have you considered this: PEOPLE (men and women) with low intelligence/knowledge/education/debate skills stifle/censor intellectual discourse? Example: a person who enters a conversation ready to completely disregard what an individual may contribute, due to only one superficial (superficial when it comes to intellectual discourse) fact, you know, like the sex of the individual. You may think you're allowing "true" intellectual talk to occur by excluding ALL women, but you are just limiting the …
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 07:33 PM
1

"sorry bro im in law school where all the men write like this and we all have great conversations about Niche im just lucky i guess"
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 07:30 PM
1

Yeah, so you are using a claim here- an appeal based on your personal experience- kind of like that "female" argument tactic you mention above. You are making many, many assumptions.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 07:27 PM
0

Most PEOPLE are simply not able to look past their nation's border.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 07:25 PM
-2

You can totally wrestle bears and respect individuals regardless of their sex if they are worthy of your respect. I mean, if you're into that.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 07:10 PM
5

Thank you. Everyone has their own preferences, and there is no reason why a rapist would rape only traditionally attractive women. Just like how traditionally attractive people are not the only humans having sex.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/13 06:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter