TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

incelicious Archive

View 12 posts and 659 comments by incelicious on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
64

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience24/08/18 01:41 AM
58

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 02:12 PM
54

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience25/07/19 01:47 PM
31

Question For Womenincelicious/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:08 PM
28

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience06/12/18 05:12 PM
24

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience15/11/18 03:41 PM
22

incelicious/r/MGTOW08/12/17 03:39 PM
16

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience10/12/18 06:31 PM
15

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience04/12/18 05:07 PM
14

incelicious/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 03:29 PM
6

Discussionincelicious/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 05:22 PM
6

incelicious/r/MGTOW29/10/18 03:43 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

A low birth rate for any society is almost universally recognized as a bad thing. Japan’s low birth rate not only affects them, but also the world economy. Stop listening to autistic people about dog whistles.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 10:53 PM
0

Good for you, honestly. I don't see this view much these days.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 08:45 PM
1

I don't know. My dad was always doing something outside that needed to be done. Saved us a lot of money too by doing it himself and not paying thousands of dollars for others to do it for him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 07:58 PM
1

I didn't only mention mowing the lawn...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 07:48 PM
1

Why would you say it is “outdated”?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:43 PM
1

No they are not, but people should really get in the habit of producing excess wealth for savings. Then again people are probably not making enough money for that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:41 PM
0

Which country, if you don't mind me asking?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:27 PM
1

So it's an Ameriburger thing pretty much. Making corporate wage-slavery fun!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:24 PM
0

I'm wondering: how do they define "housework"? Are they only counting the stuff which women have been traditionally doing, like cooking, cleaning, and laundry? Or are they also including the things outside the home that men tend to do, like cutting the grass, fixing things around the house, making additions to the house and so on? My mother always did the most of the cooking, most of the cleaning, and the laundry. My father always did work outside the house like the landscaping, building additio…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:13 PM
2

I meant Mad Max world if people only produce enough for themselves. Economies first started with the invention of farming. People stopped being Hunter-Gatherers in favor of growing stuff and growing more than they needed to sell the rest and also to put away for a rainy day. As it is right now people barely have any savings on average, if they have any savings at all. You see how deep in shit we are during a pandemic waiting on government bailouts.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:07 PM
1

Like what? For the average person, nothing has been such a financial good as a home. People will always need shelter. Twitter and Instagram feeds come and go.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:04 PM
6

Honestly, that is exactly what I think is happening. See my other comments in this thread. Pretty much stating the same. It is indicative of wealth being more and more concentrated in the hands of the few.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 06:01 PM
1

Certainly there must be some financial incentives to get married
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:59 PM
2

France. I can also think of a few in Eastern Europe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:55 PM
1

Well said
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:53 PM
2

In order to have an economy, yes. Otherwise it is Mad Max world.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:50 PM
1

Some people say it's all agency. Others say it is all circumstance. The reality is, it is both agency and circumstance. Some problems are their own fault for sure. Others are circumstance out of their control. Anything else would be a Just World fallacy or Fatalism
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:44 PM
1

Which means we have less people producing excess goods.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:41 PM
3

You're right. The license itself is cheap. Marriage is expensive. Let's not confuse marriage with wedding. But since you brought it up, having a wedding may be a demonstration of wealth (and thus financial stability) of the marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:39 PM
1

You have it exactly backwards. Gendered norms don't cause marriage. Marriage causes gendered norms. Normative monogamous marriage is objectively better for society than any other alternative, especially when it comes its social and economic benefits. Here, we develop and explore the hypothesis that the norms and institutions that compose the modern package of monogamous marriage have been favoured by cultural evolution because of their group-beneficial effects—promoting success in inter-group co…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:34 PM
1

She didn't mind, so no harm no foul. Everyone else can just shut the fuck up with their endless fake outrage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:27 PM
2

That's great. But 'work' is an abstraction, not a person. Your work will never hug you, kiss you, have sex with you, be there for you when you are down or sick, etc. Certainly work is rewarding, but at the end of the day, it is just work. It is a means to an end and not an end in itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:20 PM
1

A couple of disagreements here: isn't that different from cohabitation It's very different. There are a whole mess of legal rights and responsibilities that come along with marriage. Tax breaks are just the tip of the iceberg. Plus it is much easier to abandon a partner in cohabitation than it is marriage. Cohabitation doesn't afford nearly as many legal protections. People just don't want it anymore as strong as they used to. I'm getting mixed signals on this. On one hand, there are the article…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:14 PM
2

Choice is good. Personally, I would rather choose someone who loves me over someone I only have a fleeting business interest with. I'd rather not be commodified as a cog in some corporate machine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 05:04 PM
-1

Hmm. I think it was more because of social and economic stability as opposed to gendered norms.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 04:36 PM
0

You could certainly have a civil wedding in front of a judge for dirt cheap, live in rent all your life, never have kids, lease all of your vehicles and not have to have a savings account or kids college fund, but such people are a minority. For most people, I wager, they want to have the nice wedding, the house, the mortgage, the savings, the whole thing but can’t afford it. And all of that has negative economic (and social) repercussions. And while I agree that marriage isn’t for everyone, for…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 04:20 PM
0

Interesting. Could you elaborate more on this?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:58 PM
0

True. But that is nothing compared to months or even years of maternity leave. Some countries mandate two years of paid maternity leave PLUS paternity leave for the men. Plus family related leave. I still want to hire you. Plus I know your husband will be on my team with making sure you are a strong independent woman who works all the time. CHA-CHING.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:51 PM
2

If you look at my OP, there’s a link there about how childbirth is the lowest in 35 years. Also the amount of single moms have been holding steady the past 10 years. https://www.statista.com/statistics/205000/number-of-families-with-a-single-mother-in-the-us/ That aside, single moms don’t tend to be the white collar corporate types.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:47 PM
1

Wow. I’m going to start a business and I’m going to hire you. You’re the perfect employee.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:38 PM
5

Working mothers nowadays are entitled to paid maternity leave which puts them ahead of their Victorian counterparts. BINGO. Which is why women not marrying and not having families is a good thing for Boards of Directors, Shareholders, and CEOS and why the business would be more profitable without having to pay women for family-related leave AND health insurance.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:34 PM
3

I can't prove this one way or the other (I may actually have to look this up), but I am willing to bet that marriage is going strong in wealthier sectors of society. I figure starting from upper middle class, marriage rates are just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:30 PM
2

Which is why the Fed is cutting rates lower and lower. You can get a 30 year mortgage now at about 3-3.5% Ten years ago the rate was like 6-8% on a 30 year mortgage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:26 PM
1

I'm not doubting your personal experience in the matter, but in the grand scheme of things, corporations are absolutely celebrating this trend. More profits, more productivity. Less time going into families, less money being saved, more money being spent on products and services. Less health insurance benefits needing to be paid out, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:23 PM
0

Human evolution is a bit complicated. It wasn't always the ruthless 'only the strong survive'. The invention of monogamy was the participation trophy. The people at the top realized that in order to keep this neat thing called civilization going was to also keep the peasants happy (and producing more peasants). A functioning human society needs every class pitching in and happy. Otherwise revolutions happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:15 PM
0

If the Fed's response to stimulate spending over savings is to lower interest rates, what will they have to logically do if they want to stimulate savings over spending? They would need to raise rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:10 PM
4

Excellent comment. I agree. While many people will think the decline in marriage is, in a vacuum, and for personal/political reasons, a good thing, what they don't see if that it is indicative of a major economic decline in the lives of average folks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:07 PM
1

True. But also fewer everything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:03 PM
1

What about the economic implications of the trend? Less people are also owning homes as more are renting. The two big bases of wealth building have been marriage and property ownership.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 03:02 PM
2

This is a very important point. Cohabitation situations don't have the same incentives to stay together as marriages do. Plus no tax benefits and other legal benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:57 PM
8

One criticism I have heard regarding this is that women are no longer the servants of their families as in traditional marriage, but are instead servants of their corporate overlords. If I were socially darwinistic capitalist, I would think this is great. It means women will take much less time off for pregnancy, family and such, so I can squeeze even more productivity and money out of them. So CEO/profits > family?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:55 PM
3

I completely agree that all worries will be gone once humans are gone. But that is extremely cynical.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:50 PM
0

Back to your economic proposals, I personally detest usury. So if it were up to me, I would ban all interest. Being that is fanciful fiction, interest is a reality of life. Capping interest rates may harm the government’s ability to react to bad economic conditions
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:44 PM
1

While you are certainly correct, I am wondering what people being forced to tighten their belts says about the general health of the economy
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:41 PM
2

Well to stop the bootlicking, we need to stop celebrity worship culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:36 PM
2

That’s certainly true but a bit too nihilistic for me
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:31 PM
1

It’s not expensive to get married without the celebration (the expensive dress and all that), but a show of expense can demonstrate the future financial well-being of the marriage.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:27 PM
3

What does that say about the general economic trends happening in society? Increasingly fewer staple things are becoming financially viable for most people. More wealth is being concentrated at the top
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:21 PM
3

Or you could look at it as part of a general trend of people increasingly getting priced out of the bases of wealth building, like home ownership. That absolutely does affect you in economic terms.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:12 PM
5

A formal wedding is very expensive in the West. But what tone does that set for a marriage if they go the cheap rout and just have a civil ceremony?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 02:07 PM
10

Cohabitation and eternal dating is now the new normal as many Millennials and even zoomers are being priced out of marriage, just like they are being priced out of home ownership. Both of these have been the cornerstone of wealth building.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:57 PM
2

So this is a good thing in a Social Darwinist sort of way, if I am reading you correctly?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:55 PM
2

How would it get sorted out, though, when Millennials and even Zoomers are getting priced out of marriage, just like they are getting priced out of home ownership? The decline in marriage matches the pattern of the decline in home ownership and other indicators of the decline of the standard of living for the average person.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:50 PM
5

Well, without children, there is no civilization. No future.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:43 PM
1

Do you think this could have a negative impact on society as a whole? In other words, could this negatively impact morale and productivity as marriage becomes something only for wealthier members of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:41 PM
2

It seems marriage is now something the wealthier members of society do (upper middle class and higher), considering the cost of marriage, the potential cost of divorce, the cost of children, the cost of housing and all that because they can afford it. But isn't this view somewhat elitist?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/20 01:31 PM
0

Women do not select for any criteria that would be useful in survival settings I actually somewhat agree here. Even selecting for height may be disadvantageous, because taller people stick out more than shorter ones. Bigger targets, and greater height is linked to more health issues. Excessive female sexual selection creates Fisherian Runaways after so many generations where male ornamentation is more important than adaptations for survival.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 03:57 PM
1

I see no reason to do so. It amounts to women double-dipping. They already have sexually selective advantage by default. Giving them more power is just absurd and only serves the most elite of society.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/20 03:54 PM
4

Women on the other hand, appreciated men for their personalities and skills resources and status Made a correction for you. It is now accurate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 01:32 AM
1

I honestly think society has created the belief that in order for a man to be cool and manly he needs a lot of casual hookups to prove his worth You make it seem like it's some sort of conspiracy from some fictitious "patriarchy" to use women for sex, when in reality it is women who judge men based on sexual prowess. It's not "society" (pretty vague), it is women. If that weren't the case, then feminists wouldn't be using "virgin" as an insult. They'd instead be using it as a term of endearment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 01:20 AM
1

Yes, Chads are rare. This is why women like them. High demand, low supply. Men only "obsess" over them because women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 12:59 AM
0

Instead they just seem angry that women dare have standards that excludes them. Women have standards that exclude most men by default, being the selective sex. It's only after women realize that trade-offs exist that they actually begin considering those average guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 12:56 AM
1

Most men are ugly and gross. The average woman is disgusted by the average man and believes she is entitled to a 10/10 CEO? Color me surprised. This has been going on since time immemorial and before monogamy evolved from the invention of farming, polygyny was the default for hundreds of thousands of years. Unfortunately for average-man-hating entitled women, monogamy proved to be the superior system in every way, even insofar as equality between the sexes is concerned. So get used to the averag…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/20 12:42 AM
1

Here is why thirdworldmaxxing works: women’s preferences for more masculine looking men are stronger in countries with higher sociosexuality and where national health indices and human development indices are higher, while no associations were found between preferences and indices of intra-sexual competition. Our results show that women’s preferences for masculine faces are stronger under conditions where offspring survival is higher and economic conditions are more favorable.
/r/BlackPillScience19/05/20 02:53 PM
39

How is this retard an MD???? https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-human-beast/201305/sexual-wiring-womens-breasts
/r/PussyPassDenied19/02/20 01:15 AM
6

Mammonism is pretty much the worship of money and material things. It is unrelated to frugality. Frugal people can also hoard wealth.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 04:06 PM
13

That is a bit of an illusion. Yes, it does bring people out of poverty, but that's not all it does. It also increases the gap between the top and the bottom, and also the distance between the top and the middle. Ultimately, if unregulated, Pareto Efficiency will happen, with 80% of the wealth controlled by 20% of the people, resulting in Plutocracies.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 03:30 PM
10

I don't think buying things are evil. Your arguments sound rather leftist to me. You're reading waaaaay too much into my post. Buying things is one thing, Mammonism is entirely another.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 03:27 PM
14

It's not like it is a mystery that the CIA has been all over feminism since at least the early days of second wave feminism. What started off as communist agitation, was quickly infiltrated and subverted by spooks. And it makes sense, honestly. Feminism is a better match with capitalism. Women are literally the Social Darwinist eugenicists of nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 03:24 PM
2

"Molecular genetic data contain information on the history of populations. Evidence of prehistoric demographic expansions has been detected in the mitochondrial diversity of most human populations and in a Y-chromosome STR analysis, but not in a previous study of 11 Y-chromosome SNPs in Europeans. In this paper, we show that mismatch distributions and tests of mutation/drift equilibrium based on up to 166 Y-chromosome SNPs, in 46 samples from all continents, also fail to support an increase of t…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 03:02 PM
35

Mating strategy. Because of the game being so competitive and they would be completely losing otherwise, they do things like white knight and orbit, either as a manipulation tactic or to get leftovers when it is time for betabux. Now onto the bigger picture: billionaires and the military-industrial complex love feminists (women spend lots and lots of money!!). And with the kind of money and positive media attention that gets thrown at feminism, it's no wonder that feminism is now the new "Christ…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 03:00 PM
2

From an evolutionary perspective, it is not irrelevant. A man's ability to maintain a relationship is PART of their SMV. TRP separates out SMV from RMV, but this is an illusion. Many men are aware of this and want to be in their children's lives. Huh? From an evolutionary perspective, women either shared a guy or just got pumped and dumped, pregnant, and passed off to the LTR cuck to raise the STR's bastard offspring. This entire "social order" thing you are bringing up didn't happen until MUCH …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 02:39 PM
2

I would remind you that at the biological level, people are trying to reproduce. Irrelevant. People can have children outside of LTRs. Relationships are the foundation of the family unit and social order as a whole. No argument there, but also irrelevant. Some of us don't really give a shit about the current social order. Furthermore, people in LTRs have more frequent and better quality sex. Unsubstantiated claim. There is evidence to the contrary: "Sexual frequency declined among the partnered …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 02:22 PM
5

It’s not really much different from women who see men as either dildos or free labor
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 01:58 PM
4

You mean guys that failed at the mating game in their youths look for LTRs. You are projecting. Nothing screams insecurity like a guy who needs a relationship as a validating crutch.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/19 01:56 PM
1

You can not say "shame on single mothers" and then "abortion is murder" Sure you can. The idea being to increase the costs of sex for women outside of marriage. And for men, it would increase the price. It would be good for society.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/19 02:01 PM
2

I don’t believe the stories of the men in this group who claim to have persistently tried to improve themselves and still have not seen those efforts rewarded in the market places. The Just World Fallacy in a nutshell. Just because someone does their best does not mean they will be rewarded. Conversely, there are those that don’t need to try and they are rewarded. The world is not just, and it doesn’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 11:54 PM
1

Thanks man I dig it too
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 04:59 PM
1

Whatever you say, Genghis
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 03:33 PM
1

Finnish Well that explains a lot. You Mongols sure love your drink
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 02:41 PM
2

Yeah but I’m okay with being a piece of shit. I would be adapting to a toxic environment created by feminists and their white knights. I’m not going to be tied down with some controlling slut who has the power of the law behind her to force me into indentured servitude. So yeah, my ego > some bitch As a side note, there are plenty of foreign women that fetishize Western men to the point where they would be perfectly happy to have a child by one, even if the guy doesn’t stick around. East Asia co…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 12:55 PM
1

Who says real men drink lots of alcohol? lol no true Scotsman fallacy Here’s one for ya, “real men step up to the plate”. This is a line single moms say when they need a sucker to provide for her and her bastard children
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/19 12:51 PM
3

Well shit that is exactly what the corporate class did to America. They said fuck the unions and went elsewhere for the labor
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 05:28 PM
2

There's a WORLD of fine pussy out there. There's Asian pussy, Slavic pussy, Arabic pussy, Central Asian pussy, Indian pussy, African pussy, Latina pussy - come on man. Western women are simply entitled. Fine, be entitled. There is a whole sea of pristine cunny outside of the West containing most of the world's women. And the laws don't change unless the culture changes first. No better way to get the culture to change that to cut costs and get an outsourced product.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 05:24 PM
5

Literally the first fucking sentence in my reply is "I think being cautious around strange men is perfectly reasonable."
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 05:04 PM
1

Man, all these things BP and RP guys have to worry about. Kinda makes me glad to be celibate. None of these problems affect me, especially women whining and nagging about men this and men that. The best way to avoid the dumb shit women come up with is to not give them any attention. Be above it all, or below it. Just don't be in it. And if you must have sex, go have sex in a foreign country, away from the entitlement (and the legal system lol)
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 05:02 PM
1

When women here explain why they’re cautious and self-protective around men, particularly men they don’t know, a lot of men start to argue how ridiculous it is, and how women shouldn’t be that way and it’s unreasonable. I think being cautious around strange men is perfectly reasonable. But be aware that there are consequences to that caution, just like there are consequences to the #MeToo movement because people adapt in order to CYA. You will be less approachable, and therefore will be approach…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:52 PM
3

When Instagram thots have more power than Bill Gates, I will believe that. No need to be so hyperbolic about it. Here are two good examples of looks at play: Here is a homeless Millennial that despite being homeless, still slays lonely cougars of wealth. Even if his face ain't all that cute, the dude is tall and clearly displays Dark Triad. Jeremy Meeks. He is a convicted violent felon that spent time in prison. The ONLY reason he got his wealth and status was because hoes were fawning over his …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:41 PM
1

That's what I was trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:34 PM
2

Yes, I am talking about how high earning potential makes women’s panties wet even if she has her own wealth. I am saying that this is an evolutionary and adaptive holdover since from forever ago. No woman would marry a poorer guy unless he is much more attractive than she is
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:28 PM
1

Yes. I am willing to wager that many women would rather choose a poor Baron, Count/Earl, Duke, or Prince over a CEO that earns well above median.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:25 PM
2

Money is the only thing that makes a man high value in society. And looks. And sometimes status not necessarily associated with money. Like a legit title of nobility. Even if he is a poor nobleman, he still has access to an exclusive network of people who ARE wealthy, thus increasing his odds of eventually not being poor.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:20 PM
3

The only way a situation like higher earning wife would arise would be if the husband is more attractive than the wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:18 PM
1

By the way, that paper is behind a paywall, but I found the full thing here https://sci-hub.tw/10.1080/00324728.2017.1371477 It discusses that the divorce risk associated with higher earning wife has disappeared due to the shrinking educational gender gap. It has nothing to do with actual female sexually selective preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:01 PM
2

It all comes down to women being historically less educated compared to men and men wanting young wives, who were less likely to be educated themselves. As men and women have become more egalitarian, the marriage market has also equalized. Abstract Tested the structural powerlessness hypothesis as an explanation for women's greater emphasis than men's on the earning capacity of a potential spouse. 637 female and 360 male undergraduates and 167 female and 115 male adults reported expected persona…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:57 PM
1

So men never want more money? Why is want money a bad thing, especially when you're thinking about having kids and/or expensive vacations? Of course many men want more money. That isn't the issue here. Women are more sensitive to social status when it comes to mate selection than men are. So while women select for status, men not so much, so while they won't mind it, they certainly won't go out of their way to look for it. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S109051381730315X "…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:40 PM
2

If you have anything better, post it. But it does demonstrate that men are not 'intimidated' by women above their league. How they end up settling is another issue. And of course men are hypogamic. Of course men try to score above their league at first and after being rejected, move down the ladder until they finally hit their league equal. It's the same for women, but that doesn't mean women wouldn't prefer someone more educated and wealthier than her.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:27 PM
1

Sure, it is a thing. But that is an end result as opposed to telling us about preferences. Most people at first try to shoot above their league. Failing that, they move down the ladder until finally they hit their league equal. They would prefer better, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:25 PM
1

Pretty much this and 5. “I’m going to record this guy and shame him publicly on twitter”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 03:07 PM
4

No https://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/page1-econ/2017/01/03/education-income-and-wealth/
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 02:49 PM
2

Those two things are highly correlated brah
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 02:34 PM
1

You're like a door-to-door salesman that doesn't know when it's time to fuck off
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 02:29 PM
1

since you keep calling it “bullshit.” That's because it IS bullshit. Look, I am not interested in feminism and gender studies garbage. Stop trying to sell me on it. Later
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 02:22 PM
1

>How does she feel? If he tries to speak to me I am calling the police
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 02:20 PM
1

Can you make up your mind? Stoicism is emotional suppression, especially when expressing said emotions would be counterproductive. It has fuck all to do with "emotional intelligence" bullshit
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 02:12 PM
14

0/10 mutant. My looksmatch is that radioactive Chernobyl chick with 3 arms and 5 tits
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 01:55 PM
0

lol no it’s literally stoicism.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 01:52 PM
14

I find this quite curious how Red Pilled theory is based around women only caring about resources/money and how "women are more hypergamous as ever before because of feminism and hookup culture". 38 percent of wives outearn their husbands, and that number has been increasing throughout the decades. In fact, the amount of wives being forced to pay alimony has also increased. Just because a woman has her own wealth doesn't mean she doesn't want more. So women will go for men with at least equal or…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 01:32 PM
0

What is straight up harmful is throwing tantrums, being a drama queen, thinking irrationally, being an emotional spastic, being neurotic, and having meltdowns. Stoicism is about self-control and suppressing COUNTERPRODUCTIVE emotions. Control yourself. Be above the petty bullshit. Stop spazzing out. And more importantly, stop listening to retarded feminists and gender studies bullshit. Now THAT shit causes harm. You are case in point.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 01:25 PM
2

Ok, well all the "non retarded" dudes will not reproduce. Your genes and the genes of everyone who sticks to there guns here is going nowhere. You are extinct. Congratulations. Shit I'd rather go to the grave with my dignity than be a pussy whipped bitch. Anyway you don't need bitches like that to make children, dummy. Just head on over to a third world country, get some bitches pregnant, leave them a few benjamins and be on your way. But you go ahead and be pussy whipped.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 01:18 PM
0

All of that sounds gay as shit. Especially the “emotional intelligence” part. Intelligence is for logic, not for feels.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:23 AM
1

I get the concept behind it. A guy is still a complete retard for agreeing to it, and the hoes still be entitled.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 04:09 AM
4

Women do it to manipulate men constantly, so...
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 12:31 AM
0

Honestly what else do you need? Bullshit your way inside some panties and let some beta douche play janitor to your sloppy mess later.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 12:31 AM
0

It's not confusing. That's why Red Pillers, blue pillers, and even incels get it. It's why you get it right now. It took you about 45 seconds online to figure it out. Women think kind, virtuous guys who engage them in rousing logical debates are boring, unless they're hot. If it took you 60 seconds to figure that out instead of 45, maybe you're a little slow, but that's fine. Nah, Blue Pillers are stuck in M'Lady fedora tipping fantasy land. Otherwise good reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 12:28 AM
0

Good shit. thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 12:27 AM
1

That's all part of Dark Triad.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 12:27 AM
1

I think so. Women in general love dudes who exhibit Dark Triad traits. https://scottbarrykaufman.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/The-Dark-Triad-Personality.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 12:22 AM
5

I hate guys that catch a whiff of pussy and lose their minds
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/19 12:05 AM
1

Aight bro. Then you go ahead and touch all the hoes for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 09:57 PM
1

Doesn't change the fact that the women are entitled and the men that humor them are retarded
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 08:24 PM
6

Definitely agree with that. Guys chucking themselves for a piece of ass is retarded. Men ought to make sure that they aren’t being played for fools.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 07:45 PM
4

That's absolutely retarded. Those are some seriously entitled women and those men are door mats. There is absolutely nothing 'manly' about being a retard that gives far more than he receives. Are they a fucking charity?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 07:17 PM
1

Why would any sane man have a wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:43 PM
-2

That can only have three outcomes: You get rejected You get rejected and accused of rape She likes you 67% chance of the result being bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:31 PM
1

No, there is a difference. I would much rather another man tell me how to behave than some blue-haired skank
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:24 PM
1

Misery is what improves the world, not contentment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:18 PM
6

The fuck are you on about. Don't be such a spastic.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:17 PM
1

Are you kidding me? Total despair is awesome. Life is literally the Cthulhu Mythos.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:08 PM
1

Where is this paradise that you refer to as "here"?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 05:01 PM
-1

As I answered in the other thread to the same question, it's better to just be cynical and assume that she is not into you. You can't go wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:55 PM
17

This is actually a pretty good answer. You can tell when you give a whole lot more than you receive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:52 PM
1

I wouldn't call it much of a philosophy either. Guilt by association fallacies aside, we agree on that point. It is more of an anti-philosophy.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:49 PM
2

How would you know? You're not a man. Anger/aggression are the natural response, not sobbing in the corner hoping for someone else to get angry for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:47 PM
9

Toxic masculinity is harmful to some men. Toxic masculinity, much like "patriarchy", doesn't exist. Masculinity is only "toxic" when the guy doing it is deemed unattractive by women. This is literally backed up by evidence. Gender Studies bullshit doesn't count
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:44 PM
2

No, he doesn't say that at all. That's a strawman. He says that the proper response is ultimately anger, but from a young age, boys are taught that anger is improper by female teachers. He doesn't say that you cannot feel sorrow if you are a man. Nor does he say that you can't cry. He stipulates that the ultimate response must be anger. It doesn't fucking matter if a guy is less masculine than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:39 PM
1

Ok, since this is not a biological determinism thread and instead a let’s bitch about red pill thread, I’ll chime in along those lines. I will take Rollo’s side here. What Rollo is saying doesn’t seem to be a question of biological determinism and masculinity spectrum, but rather how men ‘ought’ to behave in a hypothetical situation where a man’s son is gunned down by some lunatic. Anger would be the masculine response, however Rollo is not saying you cannot feel sorrow. Cry if you must but afte…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:30 PM
2

I think you are confusing “how men are” versus the argument of “how men ought to be”. It’s not a question of whether it is a spectrum or not. Rollo is making the case that men ought to be angry and seek retribution (regardless of how masculine a man is), not cry in the corner and hope the politicians and courts handle your business for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:21 PM
2

Plus black pill also believes in biological determinism
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:15 PM
4

Who is anyone to police anything at all? Lame argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:09 PM
-1

Huh? I never heard of him. Don't care. This thread is literally complaining about some twitter e-celeb and nothing about biological determinism.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 04:00 PM
3

The title of the post is misleading. I was hoping for a discussion on biological determinism, but instead I get a discussion about some random retard on twitter. Disappointing.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 03:57 PM
1

You are over-complicating this. I simply prefer to take the cynical view that if I man is in an LTR, the default answer is "no she is not attracted to you. Yes she is cheating and sees you as a loser with a wallet". That's all there is to it. I'm not even RP. That's just a good attitude to have.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 03:46 PM
1

If you want to see the future just fall into a black hole and before you die a horrible death you’ll see the entire future of the universe play out in seconds behind you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 03:22 PM
1

Nah this comparison is terrible. I would rather be hit on by an ugly girl than by a gay man.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 03:19 PM
1

I can guarantee you that it doesn't matter because astrology is bullshit anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 01:20 PM
5

Well if women are attracted to Dark Triad personalities and bullies, I would say yes, this happens more often than it should
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 11:44 AM
1

There's a science and system that goes beyond magazine horoscopes Yeah, it is called ASTRONOMY. Astrology is not a science.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 03:38 AM
5

Jesus Christ. If this isn’t enough to put a guy off of marriage, I don’t know what is. What a shit show marriage has become
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 02:18 AM
1

But male nature and female nature are different. And it is logical that they are different given that one gets pregnant. So naturally they will evolve different mating strategies and behavior to pursue and guard their respective interests. Female nature can be quite bad (like female sexual selection) when not offset by something else. And of course society doesn't care about higher order brain activity. Most people are easily manipulated bread and circus plebeians. Anyway, wouldn't it be better …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 01:51 AM
1

In fact, in my opinion, more than half of divorces happen partially because men do NOT do enough. There is evidence to the contrary. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/9572187/Couples-who-share-the-housework-are-more-likely-to-divorce-study-finds.html
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 01:36 AM
1

You're very reasonable. I have to give credit where it is due. However, I am reminded of a quote from an ancient Roman Senator: "Woman is a violent and uncontrolled animal, and it is useless to let go the reins and then expect her not to kick over the traces. You must keep her on a tight rein . . . Women want total freedom or rather - to call things by their names - total licence. If you allow them to achieve complete equality with men, do you think they will be easier to live with? Not at all. …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 01:03 AM
1

Consider why in Islamic culture why marriage retains value: premarital sex is illegal. Adultery is illegal. A man is legally entitled to marital relations. A man has authority over all finances and his children. You simply remove the alternatives and remove emasculating features of modern marriage and poof marriage is attractive to men again. But Western women are too proud of themselves for any of that Wouldn't many men love the idea of a women who genuinely understands and values the tenants o…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 12:30 AM
1

So you hope to play the "I'm such a trad woman" manipulative game? Nah, I think the way to go would be to remove some of those changes to marital laws since the 50s.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 12:17 AM
1

You're right, they wouldn't. So how could you incentivize them to marry, get mortgates, make children, and be productive family men?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 12:05 AM
2

All I'm trying to say is that women wouldn't be interested in magic if it actually existed You're talking about the sex that believes that astrology is legit. You are being ironic, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/19 12:00 AM
1

Or sell yourself at the street corner. But I am sure that you'll be just fine. You're wealthy enough. Most people aren't, though. And even if things don't get as bad as Japan or South Korea with the population and marriage decline, their issues will still affect you, like the article I sent to you mentioned. The only way to prevent the marriage and childless time bomb would be to incentivize men to marry again. That would mean getting rid of the past several decades worth of nonsense laws that d…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 11:51 PM
1

I get that, but in a situation of deflation due to falling wealth, what will happen to your income when your company can no longer afford you? You understand how deflation works, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 11:42 PM
1

That is actually worse that you have your mortgage already because that contract is for a set payment over X amount of years. That won't change. What WILL change is your income to adjust to a deflationary reality. What that means is that you will make far less but still have the same mortgage terms to pay monthly. You'll end up defaulting, thus contributing to the decline. And even if you don't default, that mortgage will take longer to pay off. The basis for the Western economy is literally mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 11:38 PM
1

Here’s the kicker. When shit hits the fan and economies across the world go into a deflationary spiral, that 30 year mortgage turns into a 3000 year mortgage. Loans will become more rare and interest rates will be through the roof. Of course when that happens, I and guys like me will make sure that we yell as loud as we can about how women destroyed everything. Neat, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 11:23 PM
1

You would think, right? That Millennials are going to get married later? But no. It doesn’t look that way. While we are not Japan, Japan is still a good indicator of where we are headed. And while you think this won’t affect you, it will, economically. Less people getting married means less tax write offs, and less children, and less wealth. That will lead to a deflationary spiral where there simply won’t be enough money going around to pay mortgages and loans. Guess what that means. F-U-C-K-E-D…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 11:06 PM
1

No, it is not Millennials at 70-75% married. That is the total population across all generations. The actual number for is 41% married. 59% of Millennials are single and have never been married https://news.gallup.com/poll/191462/gallup-analysis-millennials-marriage-family.aspx That will be even lower for Gen Z. And once boomers die out, Gen X will be the last generation where a majority were married. If Millennials are 41% married, it wouldn’t be too crazy to see Gen Z at half that, pushing mar…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 10:39 PM
1

That’s total marriages across all generations. It says nothing about NEW marriages and says even less about first time marriages versus remarriages. You still don’t seem convinced but that is ok. You aren’t my target audience. That would be men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 10:18 PM
1

The population has since 1960 increased Therefore the PROPORTION of married couples is smaller. As demonstrated in the link I sent to you, the amount of NEW marriages keeps falling and is the lowest it has ever been. As of 2016, less than 7 people per 1000 were getting married. In 1990, it was over 10. It is even lower than 7 if you remove remarriages. Simply put, your personal anecdotes about you and your friends aside, marriage is in a huge decline. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/heres-the-…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 10:00 PM
1

There go those anecdotes again. https://www.statista.com/statistics/195951/marriage-rate-in-the-united-states-since-1990/ And your personal life is none of my concern.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 09:41 PM
1

I hope that you’ve heard of the situations in Japan and South Korea. In Japan, nearly half of the Millennials are virgins. A good chunk of Japan’s and SK’s population have no interest in marriage. Many men there have sworn off of women and have body pillows with their favorite female anime character on it. That’s their support system. They’re even developing technology to cater to those guys. Their population is collapsing. Their economy will suffer from that, as will the world economy. https://…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 08:45 PM
2

So settling is only something someone without options can do? Correct. Note that there are men who would make themselves available, but the woman would not consider them options, so they don't count. Does it have to be conscious settling to even be considered settling? Whether it is conscious or subconscious is irrelevant, as settling is settling regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 08:27 PM
1

What’s the value in marriage? Married people have less sex than single people. In fact, outside of the initial honeymoon period, sex tapers off slowly and eventually dies, especially after children. Then onto children. You don’t need marriage for children. There is no benefit offered in marriage that cannot be gotten elsewhere and without the legal obligations. The only ones I can think of is maybe a tax break and maybe pooling financial resources, but with that comes sharing of the decision mak…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 08:11 PM
5

Correct. If it is a woman in her prime that bags a chump, she wasn't settling. As far as she is concerned, she bagged a guy that gave her vagina tingles.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:54 PM
1

lol you can't lead off with a negative and then expect me to prove you wrong. You cannot disprove a negative. You have a legal obligation to pay taxes. That is in fact some freedom that is taken away from you, yes. He is married so he does not have the freedom to sleep with other women. Many major decisions have to be approved by his spouse. For example, if the house is in both of your names, he cannot sign for any renovations to be done without you also signing off on it. He could try to buy th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:52 PM
1

drugging people into nonconsensual anything is creepy as fuck and rapey.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:45 PM
1

By virtue of him being married, he does not have freedom. He has a legal obligation to you, and any children. And by virtue of him being legally obligated to you, he can't have any dignity. He's not even guaranteed sex. In fact, you could deny him for years and there isn't a damned thing he could do about it. He also can't have anything on his own. All his things technically belong to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:43 PM
1

It's not so much that I want it to fail. It is that odds are that it will fail. Very few marriages these days last. A guy would rather have his freedom and his dignity, and we are seeing precisely that from Millennials and Gen Z. Good on them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:37 PM
1

If he's lost, there's not much I can do about that, but the younger guys out there are a different story. And there are enough dudes out there with alimony and child support payments with divorce horror stories that will help those lads get on the right path.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:29 PM
5

um mods this woman is creepy and making rape fantasies about me
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:26 PM
1

All right. I think it is pretty clear we won't be changing the other's mind any time soon. And it isn't your mind I want to change. It is the mens' minds. Given how marriage is declining into oblivion, I'd say that it shouldn't be too hard to help put the nail in the coffin of that abomination.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:25 PM
2

Pretty soon marriage won't be a thing except for the wealthy elite. It's less than 7 per 1000 getting married and dropping. https://www.statista.com/statistics/195951/marriage-rate-in-the-united-states-since-1990/
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:21 PM
2

I never thought I would run into a such a well-known meme. I feel privileged.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:09 PM
1

You are conveniently ignoring my most important point, that all men need to keep in the back of their minds: that in your prime, you would not have given that guy the time of day. The truth is, women place men into maybe three categories: men they would fuck, men they would marry, and men that are neither. It's not about "there is always someone more this and that". That is entirely beside the point. You see him as mediocre. You see him as beneath you right off the bat, and your marriage will go…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 07:08 PM
1

lol seriously who wastes that kind of money on a hookah
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:56 PM
2

Are you one of those cool wine aunts?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:54 PM
0

Nothing wrong with lemonade. But don't pretend that it is anything but lemonade. Keep your feet on the ground and all that.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:54 PM
0

You are giving women way too much strategic nefarious credit. It is a well-deserved bit of credit I am giving them. Woman doesn't just one day drop everything and decide she needs to nail down a chump, people get comfortable, want to start a family, or just have outside pressure to finally marry. Regardless of her reasons, it still doesn't change the fact that the guy is a chump. People usual marry one of those serial monogamy That's the entire problem right there. The dude will be literally pay…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:53 PM
1

One of the things I really dislike about anecdotes is that they are inherently biased. Sure, everyone knows someone who fits a mold or situation. They then assume everyone else is like that everywhere. The fact is that marriage is in major decline with alternative arrangements like cohabitating on the rise. Good riddance to Marriage 3.0 honestly. Cohabitation should be next on the chopping block. Settling is saying that I know there's better out there but it's not better for me. Which, as I said…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:37 PM
0

lol who pays $150 for a hookah
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:17 PM
-1

But contentment and happiness in that regard entirely depends on your level of self-delusion. Ignorance is bliss. While most guys will delude themselves when they walk down that aisle that he scored big and she chose him out of all of her options, the reality is that she would not have even spit in his general direction when she was in her prime of 18-25, and now that she is 30-40 and her looks are fading, all those other high status, attractive viable options have long left for younger tail. Th…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:10 PM
1

More like 46.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 06:02 PM
3

Only the crème de la crème get that privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:59 PM
2

Houses don't deny you entrance when you neglect to pressure wash them for a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:55 PM
5

Then you hold off until you are the first pick. And if that never happens, then go to another dating pool and use status to your advantage until you ARE the first pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:53 PM
-1

"Everyone who says something I don't like is a troll"
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:50 PM
1

My lad was discussing hookers and lonely cougars as if they were in some way a win. And I mentioned to someone else that yes, they are fair game but the real win would be bagging a younger woman in her prime, before she goes full steam ahead on the CC and gets raw dogged by 200+ dudes before turning into that lonely cougar.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:49 PM
1

Look, I don't make a habit of ripping into disabled people as that is against my personal code of ethics, so I'll give you a break. But you need to understand that preying on desperate old ladies isn't exactly a "win". I suppose that they're fair game, but the real win would be bagging a young woman in her prime, and one with real choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:46 PM
8

Thanks brah. Take one in return for being such an upstanding gentleman
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:42 PM
9

I would know by frequency of sex and that the sex was not contingent on me doing the fucking dishes or laundry and shit
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:33 PM
1

Speaking of socially inept, the fact that you are trying to psychoanalyze my posts just shows how much of a projection you calling someone "socially inept" would be.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:16 PM
-9

Wtf are you even talking about? Sigh. I've gotten used to getting this reply. It's the burden of me having such a high IQ.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:09 PM
0

I like how you are making lemonade out of lemons, but let's not pretend that it is fine wine, ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 05:01 PM
1

God, I am in awe of the human ability to romanticize and rationalize literally everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:55 PM
12

there is a lot of discussion here, i assume from inexperienced people about the idea that being "settled" for is some ultimate horror It IS the ultimate horror. She is a woman that would not have given you the time of day back in her prime. She would have shoo'd you off or friendzoned you. Now suddenly she "wised up" (so she claims) after a series of flings and serial monogamy. What else could you be to her other than her last resort? Congrats, you are the janitor. You get to be the cleanup boy.…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:52 PM
1

But you were, though. Married people have the LEAST amount of sex out of all demographics. You'd have more sex if you were single.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:45 PM
1

Watch out you guys, granny here is going to get up and leave her nursing home to beat you with her cane!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:44 PM
1

The issue isn’t her sex drive. The issue is you. Simple as
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:33 PM
1

Lot of angry grannies in this thread 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:20 PM
1

lol you're seething. That's a lot of anger and personal attacks there. Get help for your anger issues. Also, being uncivil is against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:14 PM
-1

You’re confusing sexual attraction with someone noticing that you can be useful to them That's how all women see men, regardless of age. At least the younger one has genuine sexual attraction. It would be validational sex. With an older woman, all sex is transactional - as payment for being a good betabux cuck, you get your annual birthday sex. You’re insane and miserable. Not a valid argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 04:00 PM
1

Worry about yourself, mate. I’m not the one getting all butt-blasted over someone dropping truth bombs.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 03:15 PM
-1

You have a lot of down-voters in this thread. My comment went from 4 updoots to -1
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 03:02 PM
1

Looks like I struck a nerve with that bit of truth
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 02:51 PM
-17

They’re all like that. The difference is the younger one is genuinely sexually attracted to you while the older one just sees you as the loser she settled with.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 02:16 PM
1

Sure, like I could narrow it down to one person, let alone one family, just by country and rank.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/19 11:44 AM
1

So you know this titled woman, you say? Which country? And is she a Freiin or Gräfin?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 11:09 PM
1

Who said anything about casual sex? A long string of serial monogamy sex is just as bad. And what does personality have to do with it? You just said all UC aristocrats fuck around. Do they all have the same personality? lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 08:25 PM
1

but just fucking around when you're young and single is normal and expected So all women, regardless of social class, are hoes? Color me surprised
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 08:12 PM
1

OK, maybe you're right. I'll go with "all women are whores" as you suggest, since they all sleep around. Kinda goes back to this study saying women lie big time about their pasts. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.8876&rep=rep1&type=pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 08:09 PM
1

The fuck are you talking about?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 08:06 PM
1

Well thanks for the vote of confidence I guess
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 04:30 PM
2

Lol it's 2019 Irrelevant. what is a "sex scandal" going to look like? She banged some dudes? Nobody cares....... You mean YOU don't care. You aren't everyone nor are you a representative of everyone. Maybe if you were a member of the United Nations you could say that. Or a member of some nation's parliament. Until then, naaahhh If she's actual monarch level famous the tabloids might report it, the same way they report someone famous eating fried chicken with a knife and fork (looking at you, Tru…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 03:48 PM
1

Which philosophies are those?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 03:32 PM
1

Because class distinctions are very obvious to observant people For example? And what makes you think the financial elite would mingle with the plebs? For MC women, promiscuity is on the list of things that impacts your social standing. For UC and LC women it is not. Right, so a sex scandal would not hurt the social standing of the daughter of a CEO, and by extension, also bring shame on the CEO himself? What about a Baroness, Countess, Duchess, Princess, etc? Would news of promiscuity not damag…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 03:28 PM
2

From the Soviet Union's communist agitator agents?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 03:24 PM
1

Again, like the other person who replied to me, there seems to be a bias or a disconnect on what constitutes UMC and UC, and I guarantee you are basing this on some anecdotes or shit you see on media. How can you tell what class someone is in? And why wouldn’t it hurt their social standing when their wealth depends on their social networks?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 03:13 PM
1

How do you know that? Anecdotal evidence? What you see is inherently biased. You seriously think a majority of UMC or UC women are out there fucking around? Or more likely staying at home or just hanging out with friends? And what do you consider UMC or UC? How can you tell the difference just by looking? When I am talking UC, I’m talking about the financial elite and the European aristocracy. Most of them wouldn’t be caught dead in most of the joints commoners go to. How much fucking around do …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 03:10 PM
3

It shows that they also have less sexual partners. The higher up the social ladder you climb, the stricter the rules for etiquette and proper behavior. IQ and income as well as wealth are highly correlated. Less sex is also highly correlated to IQ, especially for women. I’ll track the studies down if need be
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 01:53 PM
5

There is no “baseline” when talking about socially stratified societies. The baseline depends on class, education, wealth, and other factors
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 01:00 PM
10

It figures that most of the thread is nothing but anecdotes, which aren’t worth much. We can speculate on the reasons why, but data shows UMC and UC women, in general, do not sleep around nearly as much as lower class women. They suppress their sexuality more, especially since fucking around could hurt their social standing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/19 11:52 AM
2

The way it was done for thousands of years is arranged marriage. But seeing as that is not going to happen anytime soon, men would have to slut shame en masse, or somehow else using social shaming to bring the collective status of women down a few pegs. Barring that, start shaming the white knight dweebs, and the assholes that shit on other men
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 10:43 PM
1

You mean the chemical reactions in the brain and associated with “love”?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 08:43 PM
2

What will it take for manosphereans to admit that many of men's problems are actually caused by masculinity? What will it take for feminists to admit that men do not exist in a void but instead adapt to female sexual selection, which seems to favor toxic behavior like Dark Triad personalities and bullies? “Toxic masculinity” (more like male competition for mates) is every bit the fault of women as it is the fault of men. If women stopped fawning over bullies and dark triad personality types, “to…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/19 07:14 PM
4

No one is owed anything. Some things just make sense for the sake of society to be able to function. Men having families is one of them. Unless you hate economic productivity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 03:44 PM
1

Unlike the complete ideology that TBP is, TRP like the black pill makes an honest effort to rationally analyze and understand how sexuality works without all the excessively humane fluff that TBP attaches to sexuality. The politics comes as a logical outgrowth of the results of the analysis. TRP takes the trad/reactionary approach. They’re not entirely wrong for doing so. As a black piller I disagree with their trad approach, but I agree with their facts-based rationality. Realz > feelz
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 03:21 PM
6

Since “love” is not scientific, the only rational reason as to why people stop branch swinging is because they eventually run out of options.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 03:09 PM
3

About as beautiful as your vagina tingles non-argument. I’ll become a disabled feminist immediately. Actually disabled feminist is redundant lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 02:36 PM
2

“Hey you guys are forgetting society runs solely on vagina tingles!” No.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 02:33 PM
1

And rightly so, given the downward trend in marriages across the board. It’s not guys bitching on social media that they’re almost 40 and can’t find someone marriageable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 02:31 PM
4

Correct. Unchecked female sexual selection poisons gene pools by creating “Fisherian Runaway” genes, like male peacocks with insane plumage that makes them stand out to predators, rather than genes adapted to blend in with the environment.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 02:24 PM
1

In the cruel, cold world of nature women are meant to procreate with men whose genes predispose them to having the traits necessary to fight and overcome whatever environmental obstacles they face. This is not true. Female sexual selection doesn’t care about the best genes. It cares about ornamentation; features that stand out. It is why females select for height, even though excess height can lead to health issues and offer no particular survival advantage. Women are not good judges of good gen…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/19 02:19 PM
2

Well at least you are a good sport with the banter
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/19 06:30 AM
1

You forgot vegemite.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/19 05:01 AM
2

Yes I believe I have heard of the fragrance: eau de Aussie
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/19 12:23 AM
4

You’re assuming that the guy fucking the girl wants to marry her. Millennials aren’t really getting married. They cohabitate or some other alternative arrangement. A few get married, sure. But the institution is clearly dying off across all demographics except for the wealthier ones. Marriage is expensive, annoying, and for many men, esmasculating. Good riddance to marriage 3.0 tbh. With Gen Z, it is too early to tell. But I imagine the downward trend in marriages will continue.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 02:08 PM
11

I wouldn’t consider a relationship to be a prize. They seem more like a burden in the modern context. So to answer your question, my situation aside, I would not be happy with such an offer. It would be more insulting. “Yeah my options are dwindling because of my shitty life choices, so you’re what is left”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 02:02 PM
2

I don't need to smell Aussie women in order to smell them. They all reek of alcohol, piss, and cum and it could be smelled from miles away
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 01:49 PM
1

It would actually be easier to deal with 4 women than 1. The women compete for his attention and affection. So the nagging and bitching isn't directed at the man, but the other women in the harem. They will also act more submissive in order to appeal to the guy. In a one-woman deal, she knows she has you by the balls, so she can do whatever she wants and the law will support her. Plus with no other women interested in the guy, his value in her eyes declines.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 01:39 PM
1

Who is Felipe?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 01:33 PM
1

I'm not interested in the modern concept of marriage (because it is a joke) so you are not hurting me on that front. Men don't NEED marriage either. If they want kids they could simply go to some poor foreign land, knock up some locals, hand them a few dollars, and be on his way. It would be a win-win. Far better than being legally tied down to some nagging fatty that by default is entitled to half of his wealth at the least and would likely use the children to control him and his finances. And …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 01:32 PM
1

No, they evolve based on necessity, trial and error, and adapting to conditions, which is exactly what the quoted text says. If there are men at the top, it is because of women's sexual selection preferences, not because of some low-IQ conspiracy theory.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 01:26 PM
1

Let's get something straight first: feminized does not mean feminine. The Neolithic farmers that invaded Europe 10,000 years ago were feminized compared to the Hunter Gatherers that were already living there. The Neolithic peoples conquered Europe with their advanced technologies and social systems. What causes feminization is civilization, more precisely urban living, better technology, medicine, weapons of war, etc. Advanced societies are feminized and you will notice less sexual dimorphism in…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/19 01:24 AM
2

Women are also not entitled to the guy sticking around if she refuses to answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 10:14 PM
1

Incidentally, the paper also obliterates the “patriarchy” conspiracy theory: the modern package of norms and institutions that constitutes monogamous marriage has been shaped by cultural evolution driven by inter-group competition—a set of processes termed cultural group selection [8]. The idea is that competition among communities—such as nations, polities or religious organizations—favours those norms, values, beliefs, practices and institutions that most effectively harness, reinforce and sha…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 10:05 PM
4

Just don’t eat all that processed shit and you’ll be fine
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 10:00 PM
1

See? I told you that you had a chip on your shoulder. I’m good at reading people
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 09:58 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/understanding-the-erotic-code/201608/misandry-the-invisible-hatred-men?page=1
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:31 PM
1

In suppressing intrasexual competition and reducing the size of the pool of unmarried men, normative monogamy reduces crime rates, including rape, murder, assault, robbery and fraud, as well as decreasing personal abuses. By assuaging the competition for younger brides, normative monogamy decreases (i) the spousal age gap, (ii) fertility, and (iii) gender inequality. By shifting male efforts from seeking wives to paternal investment, normative monogamy increases savings, child investment and eco…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:31 PM
1

Sure, and the world is flat.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:27 PM
1

No, incels just want to be treated like human beings. They are people that have been bullied because of their looks their entire lives, especially by women, so their resentment toward women is perfectly understandable. Most incels would just be happy with a woman giving them some affection (somehow this makes them entitled?). But anyway, when I am talking about monogamy, I am talking about the benefits it bring for everyone in society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:26 PM
1

You don't need to state your opinion. The two other replies you posted before the question kinda gave away your entire attitude to it. Also Yikes sweaty your posting history is full of misandry oof
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:22 PM
1

Cheating or not cheating, hopping from dude to dude says low class. You aren't saying anything different from what incels are saying. In fact, incels often repeat such feminist talking points about how freely they fuck around and how monogamy is bullshit and part of the patriarchy and all that, but when incels say it, it's misogynistic lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:20 PM
1

So the incels are correct? Women really are all skanky and untrustworthy?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:11 PM
1

That's the attitude implied by your words. If you don't like it, don't do it. I could list the benefits it has for women and the benefits it has for society especially but I doubt you care. You are here to argue.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:09 PM
1

Not really much of a point getting into it when you’re already convinced that monogamy is bad
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 08:02 PM
4

Why would they be cheating left and right with Chads? We are talking about Dual Mating Strategy, not hypergamy and branch swinging. And more often than not, the costs to her socially and economically would be greater for cheating than not cheating. So most children out there from a betabux marriage in fact belong to the betabux fathers. Most genes getting passed on aren't "alpha" genes. They are average normie betabux genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 07:14 PM
1

3 or more, not meaning any 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:57 PM
4

They discuss the dual mating strategy of women, dummy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:52 PM
1

Not a valid argument
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:51 PM
9

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224490409552213 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1090513805000930 https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/sexual-personalities/201501/women-want-short-term-mates-too https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11324580_Sexual_motivation_and_duration_of_partnership
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:33 PM
1

https://www.livescience.com/16439-lowtestosterone-men-genetic-markers.html
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:31 PM
3

You’re making a variant of the blank slate fallacy. You are saying that genetics plays no part in things and that is obviously false. Genetics even plays into IQ and other things. Don’t discount genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:25 PM
2

Sure. And there are guys that no matter how much they exercise, their T levels won’t go up that much due to genetics. It only takes a few generations of AFBB to drop T levels in a society.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:23 PM
2

AFBB, the dual mating strategy of females
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:21 PM
7

Yes but the consequence of the paleo lifestyles was short lifespans.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:20 PM
0

The Amish also have a limited male gene pool to select from. Environment is part of it, but the rest is genetics.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 06:14 PM
1

I think alot of men take the whole chase as constantly bombarding a girl even though she is showing clear signs that she is not, at all, interested Before male sexuality* was de facto criminalized, it was necessary in order to propagate the species as much as we have, and with such diversity. We'd never be where we are at now if Stone Age Johnny accepted the rejection of every female that turned him down. Since you guys love science so much, can you think of any species that the female is not th…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 05:46 PM
4

I think there is more to it, and has more to do with genetics getting passed down because of female sexual selection and AFBB. Anecdotal, but I am fairly sedentary and have high T. I believe this is genetic that runs along the male line. Anyway, going with the genetic theory, women over the past few decades have opted to fuck Chads during their youth - either using protection, abortions, or opting to be a single mom, or whatever - and then settling down with Low-T provider guy, giving him a kid …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 05:24 PM
1

I would also like to add: women ONLY want to be dominated by attractive men. If a woman demands equality from you, that is code for “you are beneath me” and only of average attractiveness and AT BEST will qualify you for annual birthday sex as a reward for being a good betabux servant. If you are unattractive, she wants nothing to do with you. Maybe you can orbit and help finance her escapades with attractive men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 03:31 PM
1

Why are Aussie women so skanky and uncouth?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 02:16 PM
4

Semantics about prey and all that shit aside, pretty much, yeah. They can’t very well manipulate men who pay them no mind, or men that get their cummies and leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 02:14 PM
2

I wish I were one. But no, I am not. There many definitions of “decent human”, mostly varying by culture
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 02:10 PM
1

It’s like this: women cannot be involuntarily celibate. It is impossible. All women that are celibate are so voluntarily. “Femcels” imply that they celibate do to factors beyond their control. This can never be true for women. Therefore femcels do not exist
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 02:08 PM
1

Femcels don't exist, so whether they reject it or not is entirely irrelevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:52 PM
2

Laws always move much slower than culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:48 PM
-2

I'd imagine that some of the changes that occur are: the woman losing respect for the man because he finally gave in, thinking she owns everything and is entitled to everything, and of course, the amount of sex being had drops significantly. I was reading that staying separate keeps sex alive longer and is better for T levels ​ TL;DR why the fuck would you move in with an SO??? Tell that hoe to find her own fuckin place.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:46 PM
2

What is a "decent human"? And who makes the rules defining what a "decent human" is?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:42 PM
7

Male sexuality is not predatory. Aggressive, yes, but not predatory. It evolved that way because of how picky members of the female species are. And as a side effect of this aggressive sexuality, women can use the attention they get to their advantage, by accumulating orbiters, cuck farming, and otherwise financially benefiting from male thirst. A REAL MAN GOES AFTER WOMEN, NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND! Cool 'No True Scotsman' fallacy bro. As much as you may like to imagine your manly self treating …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:41 PM
2

That doesn't make sense. Why would you treat unique people the same?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:31 PM
8

The only ones who benefit from young women stopping these behaviors is low value men False. Society as a whole benefits. Less single moms, less male competition which is a source for much of society's ills (like violence). No one other than a select few benefits from male competition caused by that shit. But I do realize that I am asking for a lot here on this sub for people to see the forest for the trees and not just think about cummies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:29 PM
1

Equal and unique are contradictory terms. If everyone is equal, they are not unique. If everyone is unique, they are not equal.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:24 PM
2

Those are dude hands. You had better be a dude. Also, you didn't censor the university you got it from.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:23 PM
1

Sure, will do. Try not to rip it off of a Google search
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 02:04 AM
1

Ugh. Even worse. A colony of deformed mutant criminals
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 02:00 AM
1

The fact that you refer to normal things as “vanilla” says that you’ve been poisoned by them. Also, you’re British 😒
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:55 AM
2

You're assuming that I can't read Latin.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:43 AM
1

Yes, I know. I am quite frankly awesome. Look more, there's some great stuff in there. Quality shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:42 AM
1

Oh God. A BDSM fan girl lecturing me on what is appropriate lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:41 AM
1

You are aware of the insane popularity of Fifty Shades of Grey and "daddies"? Don't blame men for many young women being into older guys and into that domination submission shit
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:07 AM
1

What's next? You going to whack me with a flurry of bad joke Tae Kwon Do moves?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 01:06 AM
0

You said this sub is full of pedos. So.. you fit right in
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 12:53 AM
1

The only thing good that comes from Red Pill is the evo psyche stuff. But is otherwise shit (just be confident bro!) and full of tradcucks while blue pill is Cinderella fairy tale-tier shit with male feminist cucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 12:49 AM
1

So, a perfect place for your kind, then
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 12:38 AM
2

False dilemma. You can be faithful to both or neither. Marriages are matters of the state. If I don’t have a piece of paper from the state declaring my marriage, I wouldn’t be married.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 12:35 AM
1

Yeah ded from bad joke poisoning 😒
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 12:30 AM
0

That reminds me of the “imagine having a daughter”/“think about it logically” meme 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/19 12:00 AM
2

I hate anarchists and lolbertarians lol @ “I would totally lie if it served me at the time but you can trust me” I can see why you would take it as an accusation lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:57 PM
7

Good idea. It should be a law making it mandatory, or at least required by all insurance companies.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:53 PM
3

Can you kindly point to me the source of whatever it is the fuck you are talking about? Thanks fambalam
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:48 PM
1

dataninja 😒
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:47 PM
1

Also incels: hoes mad
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:45 PM
2

No, data scientists aren’t unicorns. But you aren’t one of them, so that’s a bit irrelevant 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 11:03 PM
5

It’s only an accusation if you take it as one, or if you intend to try to manipulate him through guilt trips; by gaslighting and trying to make him feel like he did something wrong. Suspicion shouldn’t have to exist in order for you to go through a formality proving that the father is who you say it is. No different than providing documents to the government.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 10:48 PM
6

Nah, I don’t like the accusation guilt tripping. It’s manipulative. If you have nothing to hide, you shouldn’t get defensive about it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 10:31 PM
1

Paternity testing should be automatic, as part of the whole hospital deal. Paternity fraud causes too much damage to too many lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 10:27 PM
1

Why wouldn’t I? Too convenient. I have better odds of being hit by a meteorite in the head in my house than to run into some random person with a PhD in data science on some subreddit
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 10:10 PM
1

“It should be illegal for men to find women younger and more fertile than me attractive!” Regards, The Wall
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 10:07 PM
4

Because you said so, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 09:56 PM
1

Riiiiight. You just happen to have a PhD in Data Science 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 09:28 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matching_hypothesis Has the studies listed in the article, as well as the theory behind it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 08:33 PM
0

A femcel in theory is a female incel. But there are no female incels. They are simply not happy with the dating pool they have access to.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 08:21 PM
1

There is no way that a sub that cries about its supposed "inceldom" while discussing ex-boyfriends and about how lonely they are all the while forbidding men to contact them is in a way shape or form serious. It is satire. That's all it can be.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 08:09 PM
1

But every woman is not unique. That would imply that ascertaining patterns would be impossible. In the field of Data Science, patterns can be determined and applied to determining future behavior within almost 99% accuracy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 08:04 PM
4

That may be because familiarity is attractive. Since a looksmatch is most familiar, they would be most attractive, and one study I had read suggested that most people end up with their looksmatch, despite years of shooting higher out of their league.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:55 PM
1

No, I have the right one. They are pure satire. Have you ever gone through some of their threads?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:51 PM
3

I believe that is incorrect. Red Pill, much like Black Pill, believes that women are amoral and simply regurgitate either what is popular at the time or the values of whichever guy made the biggest impact on her. There is no inherent "good" or "evil". Women simply are the way the are due to evolution: natural selection and sexual selection. Black Pill believes that since women are the choosier sex (see Briffault's Law and its corollaries), and that most men are not attractive in the eyes of wome…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:49 PM
3

>Everyone is equal and uniquely different That's a contradiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:41 PM
3

Some overlap doesn’t mean the roles don’t exist, nor does it mean that they are invalid, nor serve a purpose.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:31 PM
3

It’s the same with Blue Pill men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:27 PM
3

distributions are mostly overlapping What are you talking about??
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:25 PM
1

They’re a satire sub. They aren’t a thing
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:23 PM
1

I believe that I'm a human being with distinct preferences and quirks who is not plugged into some female hivemind which governs my every action Literally every woman on earth says this. “I’m not like the other girls”. What do you make of all the science demonstrating patterns in human female behavior? What makes you think that you somehow exist outside of human evolution? Are you a creationist or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/08/19 07:22 PM
1

If women en masse accepted that men only value sex and not commitment they'd simply stop having sex with anyone but chad and opt into single motherhood. How in the world did you arrive at that conclusion? What's the reasoning? Why are you men so hell bent on women seeing the male imperative for what it is? Why is it so difficult for women to keep their legs closed? You're not painting a very flattering image of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 08:08 PM
1

you're clearly not interested in anything that contradicts your worldview I'm not the one getting angry because someone is disagreeing with me. You're projecting. And you want me to read a work of fiction as evidence? What next? Harry Potter as evidence of how the English live?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 08:03 PM
1

lol at this point I don't know who paints a worse picture of women: MRAs who insist women are evil cunts that secretly rule the world through their vaginas, or the "Oh sweet summer child" disabled reddit feminists that insist women are sad, pathetic victims with no tools at their disposal to do anything unless men OK it through pieces of legal paper (unless it is for having extramarital affairs). Women of the nobility and royalty enjoyed wealth, status, and rights above and beyond 99% of the men…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 08:00 PM
1

Oh my sweet summer child lol you still use that stupid line? Also, Apex Fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 07:43 PM
1

Some kept lovers, I'm sure. The majority? I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 07:18 PM
5

Thanks for putting the name to it. Saved
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 02:03 PM
6

This is a brilliant comment and perfectly sums up feminism’s kvetching. Fukken saved
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 02:02 PM
3

It's so fascinating to see the blue pill mind and its ability to rationalize away reality into a Harry Potter fantasy world delusion. Researchers really need to look into that. Being an asshole only works if the guy is good looking. That aside, being an asshole and bully really does work, because they get way more sex than any other kind of guy. Tons of studies on this. Here is one (science article with direct link to study at the bottom) https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/12/17121414080…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 01:50 PM
3

Yes, it's the guy's fault a woman got pumped and dumped and him having misgivings about it. How evil of him. How dare he. Doesn't he realize that he should feel honored that a woman is even giving him the time of day?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 01:37 PM
0

What you seem to want is for women to be sacrificial Interesting that you associate not sleeping around with "sacrificial", as if you and other women cannot possibly fathom existence without serial monogamy or casual sex. You're objectifying yourselves. If you want men to think better of you, act better. Act high class. That being said, empathy doesn't really do anything for me in this context. What I want from women is virtue, but I realize that is asking too much. I'll leave virtue to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 01:32 PM
1

Sure, without being a hedonistic retard.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 01:12 PM
1

There is no proof that they were miserable
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 11:16 AM
0

You’re right. It’s entirely absurd to even have the most minute expectation of women being able to think beyond the present. Who needs to see the forest for the trees? It’s all about tingles and feefees at the time. In fact, why the hell do people even save money? For some fictional future rainy day? And how do you know you’ll live to retirement? You could die in a car crash tomorrow. So you may as well spend it all now. Right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 01:03 AM
1

Oh I see what is happening here. This wasn't a law but a judge's (William Blackstone) commentary on the law. His interpretation was that a married couple were one single legal entity for economic purposes, much like a corporation is considered a single legal entity (i.e. a person) for economic purposes. And it makes sense, given how marriage was viewed - two people become one under God and the law. Nothing particularly egregious about this.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/19 12:06 AM
1

I would if I could, but that’s not really an argument. Other than a few cases, we really don’t have any evidence that even a majority of women opposed their marriages to whom they were betrothed. The likelihood is many simply went with it and learned to love who they were married off to.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 11:17 PM
1

Maybe for you there is an emotional distinction but there is no logical distinction. People had duties back then, and that was one of them. Just like it was the duty of men to go fight in wars and probably die. You get to marry a guy of higher social status and one of your descendants gets to be a king or queen some day with such arrangements. That arrangement is a hell of a lot better than going to through dozens of guys before you find that your looks and your pool of interested men are fading…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 11:00 PM
1

Parents make decisions for their children all the time, not just for what is best for them, but also what is good for the family. Parents force their kids against their will to clean their rooms, or go to school and do homework, or to stop watching TV. Therefore children are property. We are also forced by laws against our will to pay taxes and do certain things. Therefore we are property. See how this line of reasoning is flawed? Further, men didn’t have a say in who they married either. That w…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 10:08 PM
1

You’re moving the goal posts here. I never said there weren’t arranged marriages. You said they were property. Property doesn’t have rights. Royal and noblewomen enjoyed huge rights, such as the ability to own land and inherit estates and do things other than simply make children. That doesn’t mean they weren’t married off. Most noblewomen did not get married off so young in the later centuries of the nobility because life expectancies greatly increased. Maybe in medieval times I can understand.…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 07:25 PM
9

I'm pretty sure she is just stating her own value, here People who feel the need to state their value are anything but what they state. It's like the people that feel the need to show off their bling "hey look at me how high status I am!" Inferiority Complexes are not sexy. That's the idea, its not just thirsty dudes who wanted to fuck, its high value guys who wanted to relationship her. OK, and? If she said no to them and yes to me? Should I feel bad about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 06:09 PM
15

For starters, the condescending attitude would piss me off. “You’re lucky to have me” lmao She’s talking like she’s Marie Antoinette and out of the kindness of her heart, she saving some pathetic peasant from starvation. Your Highness! You’re looking at it the wrong way. It’s not that no one ever wanted to fuck her. Lots of thirsty dudes out there. It’s that she had self-control and sense enough not to emasculate her future husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 06:00 PM
0

I’m looking over some genealogy here, as we speak, of some noble families in Europe from about the 1500s. The noblewomen I am seeing here (baronesses, countesses) were marrying in their 20s at the earliest. You’re probably thinking of peasant girls. I think the marrying as teens thing is a myth, at least for the higher classes. And I see nothing wrong with segregating men and women. They would probably enjoy each other more that way
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 05:54 PM
0

Yes but like all freedoms, there should be limitations, as human sexuality can have disastrous consequences (diseases, single motherhood, demographic issues, and even economic issues)
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 05:07 PM
1

Marriage is also a dying institution these days. Give it a few more decades at best and it'll be mostly gone with alternative arrangements that don't require men to sign their lives and wealth away just to maybe get that once-a-year birthday sex and a lifetime of nagging. Regardless, noblewomen were hardly property (at least in Europe). They enjoyed rights well above and beyond what peasants enjoyed. Yet I don't think many slept around before tying the knot with some Earl. Europe did not really …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 05:05 PM
2

You seem to be implying that if women have a choice, they would choose to be promiscuous. Women have agency, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 04:59 PM
1

Ok, setting aside the debate of whether social ranks exist or not in mammals for a moment, let’s focus on your last comment about male competition. Let’s suppose for a moment that we have a hypothetical scenario where all men practice neither dominance or subservience with each other. All are equal. Then women come along with their picky sexual selection and all that equality goes right out the window. Equality is impossible and the dominance game unavoidable for the simple fact that female sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 04:45 PM
-1

Again I am wondering how humanity lasted as long as it did with monogamy and for most of the past 10,000 years premarital relations having been either barred or heavily stigmatized. In fact, the more effort you have to put in a relationship to make it work, the greater the odds that she takes you for a loser. In other words, the less she respects you, the more effort required
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 04:38 PM
1

lol no they don't take "practice". They take work. My God, it's any wonder how humanity lasted this long over the past 10,000 years when monogamy became a thing without messing around before settling down. How did they manage without "practice"?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 04:10 PM
25

he should feel lucky to have me because i'm hot shit and i have my pick of the litter and i still chose him. Only a retard would pick a wife that way. At the very least, no self-respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 03:59 PM
8

You don’t need to personally experience something to have wisdom on it. No scientist has ever been to the moon, yet scientists can, with authority, know many things about it. It’s a logical fallacy to assume otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 03:52 PM
10

Shouldn’t really matter whether it is casual sex or a long string of serial monogamy sex. They are emasculating all the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 03:50 PM
7

It’s emasculating regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/19 03:47 PM
0

Too bad caulking it won’t make the history of other men’s penises go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 10:55 PM
1

woe-is-me vibe I’m hardly woe-is-me outside of incel spaces. I haven’t cried about my situation. I mainly attack the culture.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 09:54 PM
2

Yes, if you are looking at it that way. However, when a guy asks or the topic comes up in person, the 2.6 comes into play, when the real answer is 4.4 Most guys don’t get the anonymous answer, obviously
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 09:50 PM
1

I have a feeling society will eventually "go back" to pairings of no sexual experience after this era of lots of sex everywhere. It may be something that goes through cycles of prudishness and libertinism and back to prudishness again, depending on social and sexual pressures.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 08:28 PM
0

No it doubled when they thought they were on a lie detector. That's the kicker of the study. Women will lie about this shit until they believe that they've been caught.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 08:15 PM
1

It’s not just about wolves. The term has been applied to multiple species by the scientific community for ages. Snopes is still not a valid scientific source.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 07:15 PM
0

I like the gangbang analogy, because with all things considered, that’s what the average woman these days has gone through (at minimum). Sad state of modern men to be desperate enough to settle for a woman that has been raw-dogged by at least 6 guys before he has to marry that piece of leftovers.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 07:11 PM
1

It’s better to claim non-existent sexual partners than to try to memory hole existent sexual partners. Some lies are far worse than others.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 07:07 PM
1

Check out this study. Men's lies about their n counts are negligible. Women's lies about their n counts are laughably understated by orders of magnitude. Women self-reported, in this study, an average dick count of 2.6 but when they thought they were hooked up to a lie detector, suddenly the number jumped to 4.4 but by contrast, men's n counts went from 4.0 to 3.7 Ain't that some shit? http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.8876&rep=rep1&type=pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:08 PM
5

The NHS study is based on self-reporting. Women VASTLY understate their n count.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 05:01 PM
1

Of course, the discrepancy may be because of women understating, so perhaps the true number is more like 6 for both men and women. Promiscuity in women is "overstated", huh? Personally, I think it's great that by the time I find a woman that wants to settle down, each time I go to kiss her I'll taste 6 other dudes. Isn't that wonderful? Speaking of understating sexual partners, women are big liars, according to this study: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.8876&rep=rep…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:57 PM
1

TIL some redditors can't read graphs. It went from 2.6 to 4.4 and that is nearly double. If you don't like the word double, then it is SIGNIFICANTLY different from 2.6 where men's lies went from 4.0 to 3.7 - not significant. Full paper for your reference: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.452.8876&rep=rep1&type=pdf (see figure 2) In other words, men lie very little and women lie BIG TIME. So men "overreporting" is a huge myth. Women underreport by orders of magnitude
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:47 PM
2

some researchers would nonetheless dispute the use of the term “alpha.” That's great that some "researchers" would dispute the term. That means nothing, and Snopes is not a valid scientific source.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 03:55 PM
1

Chad doesn't have to wash his ass to slay. Women will just toss his salad and clean it for him. Fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 02:29 PM
8

Nine months without sex???? You poor girl. Tbh fam I wouldn’t believe it either because that’s something women lie about and lie about big time. I’ll have to track down the study, but in one particular study, women were asked their body count. Suddenly the number they have doubled when they believed that they were hooked up to a lie detector 😂 Western women are notoriously slutty and this is common knowledge throughout the world. Western women no longer command the respect they once held. Edit: …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 02:01 PM
1

The only people that make appeals to hedonism and "to each their own" are the #YOLO retards. It's not a valid argument for anything. It's a stupid platitude that even an 8 year old can come up with when they don't have anything intelligent to say. WHY "to each their own"? Getting your cummies is not a valid response.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 01:45 PM
1

Low IQ, low effort response. Appealing to hedonism is not a valid argument. I'll give you another chance to write a better reply.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 01:37 PM
1

They aren't prudes in the East? Whoa, I guess all that news about their exponentially rising numbers of virgins and their severe birthrate problem must have been my imagination? Better to be a prude and maintain some dignity than be a hole. These days men seem content with being walking dildos and women with being holes to stick it in. Sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 01:27 PM
1

You must have me confused with one of those lolbertarian retards, whose brains are too fried from smoking all that weed to care about how corporate interests are shitting up society. I don't care what the composition of their board is nor do I give a shit what their particular ideology is or is not. Scummy is scummy, and that ad was it. Lowest common denominator grade stuff. Thankfully, there are countries in Europe where this sort of low-class advertising would never fly. And it shows, too, wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 01:24 PM
1

That’s some fucked up shit, fam. I can totally understand sharia. Give women a chance to be holes, and they turn themselves into holes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 11:58 AM
1

Western female problems
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 11:55 AM
1

I also noticed the commercial was a huge hit with insecure internet fat guys that like to talk tough on Reddit. But yeah, running it during the Super Bowl certainly would have netted more than just a few butthurt guys, you know with the ratings that the Super Bowl pushes. But hey, P&G is doing well so they can afford a colossal fuck up like that, despite pulling in a few roasties and Soylent swigging man-boys that don’t shave anyway just talk shit on the internet. It’s just a really scummy tacti…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 04:22 AM
1

You’re erroneously assuming all marketing campaigns are successful. Some are complete disasters. Looks like the ad didn’t do too well on Gillette sales and may have even backfired. Nothing like attacking your #1 demographic, aye? https://www.barrons.com/articles/gillette-procter-gamble-earnings-51556117984
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/19 02:39 AM
1

That place is not solely for men. We are talking about places solely for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 08:29 PM
1

Credit card processing for donations.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 08:27 PM
2

lol just the simple act of opening something exclusively for men will have a crazed mob of screeching harpies, their white knights, and their corporate sponsors ready to de-platform and mass media shame. What I said was, previous generations of feminists and civil rights activists had lots of communists (and eventually the CIA) on their side. Now they have corporate sponsorship from billionaires because it fits an agenda.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 08:14 PM
1

I guess you haven't heard of "de-platforming". Crazy new trend to shut down political opposition from the private sector.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 08:09 PM
3

I guess you've been reading Vice or some similar shit rag. But they are, in fact, real. Alpha, beta, and all that are just names we give social ranks that exist in pretty much all mammal social groups, and perhaps all animals including insects. It's the 4 basic social ranks that can be found in any caste system, even in humans, of dominance and subservience. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C39&q="alpha+male"&btnG= https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C39&q="beta+…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 08:07 PM
1

It's not cuckolding, but those women like that their men have been around, maybe it does something for them sexually. It's mate value. If the guy banged lots of women, she knows that he is valuable. It signifies social status.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 07:57 PM
2

Yeah I think those women are everywhere. If it came down to it, I believe women would rather share an attractive, wealthy man with other women than have a poor, ugly man exclusively to herself. In fact, it is in our genes. In most of human history, the arrangement has been a few men with multiple women (harems), and this is the reason the Y chromosome is much less diverse than the X. ​ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00239-003-2458-x
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 07:53 PM
2

What's wrong with angry? Aren't feminists angry? The bitter and angry shaming tactic is lame.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 07:24 PM
2

Yeah and plenty of people are not fans of MRAs yet pro men lol Oh? Do you have examples? Because I have a feeling you are referring to things like the Gillette commercial attacking "toxic masculinity". That whole campaign is inherently anti-men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 07:23 PM
2

Because they had the Soviets and KGB behind them, funding them and working political magic in order to destabilize the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 07:20 PM
2

Because it doesn’t stop there. Access to funds will be cut off once feminists go after their funding sources by crying misogyny
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 07:07 PM
1

It’s not that simple. Those groups had large financial and political backing from the KGB, and later, the CIA. Women’s groups get large funding from billionaires like Warren Buffet and George Soros and adoration from the media. They’re not fighting against the “Patriarchy”, they are the foot soldiers of it (look up the CIA’s involvement in and subversion/infiltration of feminism, particularly Gloria Steinem who is a known CIA asset)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 07:05 PM
2

You're absolutely right. The Benevolent sexism of needing to save women has to stop. Then no one will sit around waiting to be saved. Everyone will need to take responsibility for themselves. Agency for all.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:56 PM
1

Again, you are describing unicorns. They do not exist. Personality is a meme. No one actually cares about it, which is why in reality personality means the same thing as looks. Just look at all the women getting all wet every time there is a Ted Bundy special on Netflix. Must have been his good personality, right? No woman actually gives a shit about "meaningful connections" whatever that means. A "meaningful connection" = good dick from a good looking guy And you are right, we are animals. More…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:28 PM
4

That would say to me that she takes me for a loser, and sees me as nothing more than a provider/servant to manipulate and MAYBE reward with some annual birthday sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:11 PM
1

Here's what studies say... Good looks = Good Personality Bad looks = Bad personality In other words, looks and personality mean the same thing. The Halo Effect and Devil Effect. small subset of women out there who will look past that Yeah? Like who? Because even the "femcels" have some pretty strict attractiveness standards all the while crying about being alone lmao So where is this mythical group of unicorns you speak of?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 05:00 PM
1

Wow you quickly changed your toon, now time to move the goal posts amirite? In the bottom-most link provided, the study clearly states that your personality does not matter ONE IOTA if you are physically unattractive. You must be at least moderately attractive or women to even care about your personality. Are you going to blame incels for being facially ugly? Because that's lookist bigotry. ​ inb4 MUH showers, haircuts, watching Netflix movies with strong female leads
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 04:51 PM
1

So what can we conclude from all of this? I mean about porn, fetishes, and the (stunted) ability to have a good normal sex life with normal people.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 04:45 PM
1

MUH PERSONALITY The strongest predictor of attraction for both sexes was partners' physical attractiveness https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19558447 ​ Contrary to common assumption, adults and children agree about who is and is not attractive, both within and across ethnicity and cultures. Instead, There seem to be universal standards by which facial attractiveness is judged. Adults and children judge other adults and children more favorably than unattractive adults and children, even by thos…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 04:38 PM
1

the most important thing is communicating because most problems can be solved like that (sexually and otherwise) That's what I said earlier and you said that sexual compatibility issues can't be fixed even with communication. Here's what inexperienced virgin couples did before the age of promiscuity: I like this, I don't like that. I would do this, I won't do that. I mean really, how the hell did people manage marital sex before the era of porn and sleeping around???
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 04:33 PM
1

In the case of fetishes, you may be right. But I highly doubt most folks are into fetishism, so there’s that. It would honestly creep me out if someone put such an emphasis on “sexual compatibility” because it would lead me to believe that they are perverts whose lives are centered around sex. I’m sure I wouldn’t be alone in that belief
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 04:08 PM
2

Sexual incompatibility is not a thing when you have communication. And just because people married and didn't get divorced doesn't mean they WEREN'T happy or satisfied. Sexual satisfaction wasn't invented yesterday, you know. And most people getting married before the sexual revolution in the 60s were virgins. I'm sure some had bad sex lives. And some had really good sex lives. For most folks, they got their jollies and had otherwise average sex lives. You make it sound like sexual satisfaction …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 03:55 PM
7

I don't get why people care what other people do sexually Because human sexuality affects society at large. Think big picture. Sex and sexuality don't exist in a vacuum.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 03:45 PM
1

And how did you know what you were interested in? Porn? Way too much emphasis in placed on sexual compatibility which isn't a thing if you simply open your mouth and say what you like and don't like. How on earth did married couples manage over the past 10,000 years?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 03:42 PM
-1

I think that neither people who are inexperienced have any clue other than what friends say or what is in porn, or unless one of them is fibbing about their inexperience. If you don't have a clue, how could you have a preference?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 03:36 PM
0

Two completely inexperienced people are perfectly sexually compatible. They're both equally inexperienced.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/19 03:23 PM
15

Halo Effect. Women are more aesthetically pleasing, therefore they are better than men, and consequently get assigned traits like "empathic", "kind", etc.
/r/BlackPillScience29/07/19 02:05 PM
5

Who said height is a roll of the genetic dice? More than anything it is due to sexual selection. Sexual selection is not random. It’s deliberate female-centered eugenics that can create Fisherian Runaways that can poison the gene pool. Female sexual selection has to be offset by some other selective dynamic. Saying “diet” is just a politically correct way to avoid placing blame on female sexual selection because that would upset the feminists
/r/BlackPillScience26/07/19 08:19 PM
9

Abstract According to the dual mating strategy model, in short-term mating contexts women should forego paternal investment qualities in favor of mates with well-developed secondary sexual characteristics and dominant behavioral displays. We tested whether this model explains variation in women's preferences for facial masculinity and beardedness in male faces. Computer-generated composites that had been morphed to appear ± 50% masculine were rated by 671 heterosexual women (M age = 31.72 years,…
/r/BlackPillScience25/07/19 01:47 PM
1

Wow, look at all those copes, one right after the other. It’s as if you believe that women magically become more angelic based on geography or social class. Russian bitches really aren’t that much different from Western hoes. They aren’t aliens.
/r/BlackPillScience27/06/19 04:04 AM
2

You seem to be correct. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs332
/r/BlackPillScience30/05/19 01:48 PM
1

Is there a technical term for men aiming downward?
/r/BlackPillScience29/05/19 03:59 PM
7

They obviously would not recognize flings and fuck buddies, but they will eventually have to recognize polygamous relationships/marriages and give them incentives to settle down and invest in homes because that is the backbone of the Western economy. They'll do this as more men become incels that can't get married or MGTOW that shun marriage, all thanks to the hyperinflation of the status of the Western woman. Chads and wealthy businessmen will form harems of legal wives while the average betabu…
/r/BlackPillScience17/05/19 02:57 PM
7

I don't think that's why women get married. They do so for the status, and, of course, money - even if they have their own money prior to going into marriage. It seems marriage is quickly becoming something the more well-off women do to increase their wealth and status. They can always get Chad on the side with or without her husband's consent. ​ If monogamous marriage fails, the government will have to open up marriage to polygamy and other "alternative lifestyle" and cuckoldry so they can main…
/r/BlackPillScience16/05/19 06:20 PM
3

I think the OKC and match.com crowd of females are less picky because they are either older or have already gotten their fill of the CC and are looking for betabux while the Tinder and Grindr crowd of females are still on the CC.
/r/BlackPillScience07/05/19 03:37 PM
3

Of course you fail to see my point. How long have you been on this sub? Lurk more.
/r/BlackPillScience07/05/19 03:34 PM
7

I get all that. But hot/ugly are not good measures of ability to adapt, survive, and progress. I'm criticizing all of the unwarranted high-fiving of female sexuality as if it were some kind of perfect eugenics program. Most folks will agree with me when I say that Prince Charles is ugly as fuck. If it weren't for his royal status, he'd be an incel. In fact, just do an image search on the royalty and nobility throughout the world and you'll see that the cream that rose to the top aren't attractiv…
/r/BlackPillScience07/05/19 03:06 PM
9

Your flaw is where you say "better genetic material". Natural selection and sexual selection are not the same thing, so are you defining "better" in terms of natural selection or sexual selection? Sexual selection can lead to all sorts of genetic problems, like Fisherian runaways with exaggerated ornamentation. The peacock is a very good example of this. Natural selection should produce a smarter creature that also blends in. Clearly male peacocks are not the result of natural selection, but sex…
/r/BlackPillScience07/05/19 02:35 PM
22

It's not about not needing a man because more women are employed. It is about a hyper-inflation of women's status through media and the fact that women earn more means they want to aim higher in wealth and status when they are looking to marry or even go on a date. ​ What is "wrong" with that is women are excluding more and more men from their mating pool. That's not exactly the best direction for the species genetically speaking.
/r/BlackPillScience07/05/19 01:43 PM
8

Doubtful. Germany has legalized prostitution, complete with mandatory health checks and unionization and so on. That hasn't changed the fact that all German women view themselves as princesses. If incels are having sex with prostitutes, that's better for the typical German woman because then those untermenschen will finally stop existing within 100 meters of her. You have to hit them where it hurts: status. So long as all of society, media, corporations, politicians, education system - literally…
/r/BlackPillScience03/05/19 03:47 PM
1

nah
/r/BlackPillScience03/05/19 03:22 PM
5

Women's empowerment created an environment of high risk with little reward - hence the bear market of sex right now. It'll continue to be a bear market until there is some sort of market correction, perhaps peak feminism. Given the data, we haven't reached that mark yet. The amount of effort required to get a woman simply isn't worth what you get, which these days isn't much if anything at all.
/r/BlackPillScience03/05/19 02:53 AM
0

https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-019-6677-5
/r/BlackPillScience01/05/19 02:35 PM
8

You're never going to get a truthful answer for that. Women lie. You'd have to do a controlled experiment where they are hooked into fake lie detectors to get a more truthful response. Even doing that doesn't eliminate the sex that women think "doesn't count".
/r/BlackPillScience01/05/19 02:33 PM
6

It’s how CEOs build corporate harems. Gift giving. Of course that almost always comes with a quid pro quo price.
/r/BlackPillScience01/05/19 02:10 PM
2

>MUH BLANK SLATE >MUH GENDER ROLES >MUH SOCIETAL EXPECTATIONS I realize this is reddit, but that post of yours is a bit too reddit for this sub. Maybe try r/cuckold or r/soylent ?
/r/BlackPillScience01/05/19 01:27 PM
4

Here’s a better explanation: Men have to go through shit on a regular basis that would cause most women to have complete breakdowns. One of the only things to keep us from roping, is our ability to laugh at the shit we are in day in and day out. Women are given life on a silver platter. This is why they aren’t funny. They don’t get anywhere near the abyss.
/r/BlackPillScience01/05/19 01:04 AM
14

>humorous females Do not exist. They are given lower status because they aren't funny, and look pathetic trying to emulate humor, which is entirely a male evolutionary thing.
/r/BlackPillScience30/04/19 02:57 PM
11

Some of my favorite copes that I've heard from the incels over at IT are: "Women are just not that sexual!" "Her libido lowers over time!" ​ No, she's quite sexual. Just not for you. And her libido is perfectly fine, just not for you.
/r/BlackPillScience30/04/19 02:55 PM
6

The bottom line is, nature doesn't give a shit about the quality of your relationships. Nature only cares about how many offspring you produce. Honest question: Do you think Genghis Khan had quality relationships with his hundreds and hundreds of wives and concubines? The fact is, he is responsible for over 10% of the entire present male population in Mongolia. Talk about a legacy. ​ How about these guys mentioned in this article? How would you describe their relationships with women if you had …
/r/BlackPillScience04/04/19 07:17 PM
1

Back to inceltears you go, Mr. Soylent
/r/BlackPillScience31/03/19 01:09 PM
2

Not true. Even a cursory look at relationships will tell you this is not true. Women are far more picky when it comes to mates, by orders of magnitude. Men, by contrast, are generally more concerned with the quality of a mate a woman is in terms of fidelity and motherhood. This is why men often “mate down”, to increase female fidelity.
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/19 05:20 PM
5

Peacocks are a perfect example. Male peacocks have exaggerated plumage because that is what draws female attention. The problem with that is, not only does it draw female peacock attention but also the attention of predators. In an ideal natural selection scenario, a peacock should have evolved LESS flashy plumage, not more, so they can blend in and hide better. Male peacocks are what happens when you have Fisherian Runaways in genetics. Great for attracting females, not so great for adaption fo…
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/19 05:15 PM
10

I should also point out that from an evolutionary perspective, female sexuality can have disastrous effects on a species, even leading it to its extinction. The reason for this is that females operate exclusively on sexual selection, rather than natural selection, leading to Fisherian Runaways. Women look for signals of mate suitability (sexual selection), not whether the mate can make increase the odds of survival for them and their offspring (natural selection). In other words, adaptability ( …
/r/BlackPillScience30/03/19 04:55 AM
25

That's how it all started eons ago, when most men in the hunter-gatherer band noticed that women would rather share Chad than have the average male to herself. Men revolted. https://www.pnas.org/content/109/25/9923 ​ This process is started when low-ranked males begin using an alternative strategy of female provisioning. At the end, except for the top-ranked individuals, males invest exclusively in provisioning females who have evolved very high fidelity to their mates. My results point to the c…
/r/BlackPillScience29/03/19 09:38 PM
4

Misogyny: when you hate women as much as they hate each other.
/r/BlackPillScience30/01/19 08:27 PM
4

High-ranked women are ~20-30% less generous and less sharing than high-ranked men (d ≈ .5, N = 375). Who needs eugenics when you have women? Just put them in charge. ​
/r/BlackPillScience30/01/19 08:26 PM
16

This is why feminism is a failed experiment. Women don't even care about other women, only insofar as it helps them virtue signal. What I'd like to see is an experiment where the collaborators are opposite-sex. My bet is that women will treat lower status males like scum.
/r/BlackPillScience22/01/19 07:49 PM
2

Human's cognitive abilities and all sorts of complex social behavior, competition and courtship have possibily evolved in the same way as they are unnecessarily sophisticated for the needs of hunter-gatherers to survive. I'm pretty sure that's because those were incels and autists coping because they got frame mogged 24/7/365 and needed ways to try to impress the women of the tribe, perhaps by getting a technological advantage over Caveman Chad ​
/r/BlackPillScience20/12/18 08:59 PM
1

marriage mostly exists in current year as a way to justify a woman getting to play princess for a day And the status boost.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:40 PM
1

a romantic, dreamy virgin would be a poor investment You can't invest in unicorns. Because they don't exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:38 PM
6

If a guy who is inexperienced and young and socially inept, reading those posts about how women behave only reinforces that it is fine to be that way. That's not red pill. That's women and what they find attractive. They're big virgin shamers. Status matters a lot to them, far more than it matters to men, and they don't want to be with a guy that has no other options. ​
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/18 02:34 PM
3

Full study https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.021
/r/BlackPillScience18/12/18 05:56 PM
4

Women in real life also swipe left or right mentally within seconds.
/r/BlackPillScience18/12/18 02:56 PM
1

What kind of glue are you sniffing?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/12/18 04:25 PM
4

High IQ
/r/BlackPillScience14/12/18 12:11 AM
6

That’s how normies behave. They see a piece of ass giving them some attention and they fall for the feminine ruse. Artists on the other hand don’t fall for the ruse easily, which is why women hate them. They judge almost exclusively on actions.
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 06:55 PM
1

Seems risky.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:52 PM
1

No, I get it. I'd be inclined to agree with you if it weren't for the fact that women have the backing of trillions of dollars worth of corporations and governments, while the line that we are sold day in and day out is that men are shit and women are wonderful. So it's not just random hoes hacking it along. It's helped along by lots and lots money from really high up and it's pretty ubiquitous at this point.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:40 PM
1

>random hoes hacking it along So I guess evolution didn't happen, then? Because "random hoes hacking it along" makes it sound like a dice roll, and that isn't the case at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:28 PM
1

I'm not familar with this. What's an outcall?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:19 PM
1

"Guys! Look at these ambiguous-sounding sentences in OP's posts! Therefore OP's arguments are invalid". Come on now.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:17 PM
1

The reason why you care is because you still use women to validate yourself and you're looking for something that isn't there. That is not accurate. I "care" because I like to try to understand how things work and why they work that way. I know full well that women don't care, and really no one else does either. But that's not the point. Stop gobbling up this bullshit and buy a hooker. I was thinking of heading over to Germany where prostitution is legal and regulated to buy myself some hoes and…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:15 PM
1

The worst thing about women is that they’re human You seem to be suffering from a case of egalitarianism. Yes, women are human. No, their biological proclivities make them an entirely different category than men. Yes, we are human. And that is largely meaningless and only is useful when comparing us to other creatures (i.e. not human).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:09 PM
0

You mean the discussion didn't go your way and you weren't able to brow-beat me into submission
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 06:01 PM
1

It refers to harmful standards that society women places upon men. Fixed it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 05:59 PM
1

But masculinity is a broader concept, quite beyond gender. Moving the goal posts. Someone calls out the whole feminist "toxic masculinity" nonsense and suddenly masculinity goes from a guy thing to a "broader concept". ​
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 05:58 PM
1

Also, with a name like incelicious, I'm expecting this to be an entertaining comment section. I aim to please.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 05:57 PM
1

About how "toxic femininity" as you define it has harmed me... not that much. That part was tongue-in-cheek. I was mimicking how feminists talk.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 05:56 PM
0

Sure, women create toxicity, as do men, and kids, and old people Maybe you missed this study that I posted. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6233 It clearly states that in all species, mammals and humans included, male competition is solely created by the females. So all negatives associated with male competition, like violence, are the doing of the females of species. That social control is and has been largely patriarchal There is literally no evidence for this at all, other than feminist…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 05:54 PM
1

Presumably, the marriages are deeper than that, no? lol my sides are in orbit. Is this what you would tell the guy you end up betabuxxing? Poor bastard. He'll even eat it up too like a chump, never once considering that his wife was fucked six ways to Sunday by numerous dudes before him, but he gets to be the celibate loser that cleans up the mess and pays for it. lmao get me off of this planet ​
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/18 04:03 PM
9

By the way, here is the actual full study: https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6233
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 03:47 PM
13

Holy shit this is HUGE. Proof that females should never be given any rights. They will cause the extinction of the species.
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 03:37 PM
18

TL;DR Men with more autism judge based on actions and not face like normies do. So an autist is more likely to be a black pilled incel that points out hypocracies in normie life and less likely to fall for feminist bullshit
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 03:31 PM
17

It's a proven fact that women lie and lie big when it comes to their sexual histories. A good estimate is to take whatever she tells you and double it. Triple it to be safe.
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 02:59 PM
6

>y'all Listen Cletus. This place is a bit beyond your trailer park mental faculties. Stick to fucking your sister-cousin.
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 04:30 AM
2

Clearly it bothered you if you brought it up. Maybe buy some tampax so your vagina doesn’t hemorrhage all over the place because of it.
/r/BlackPillScience13/12/18 04:20 AM
2

Why do you? Find a different interest if it chaps your ass so much.
/r/BlackPillScience12/12/18 03:56 PM
4

You don’t even have to have competence so long as you are attractive. People will just assume that you’re competent.
/r/BlackPillScience11/12/18 04:21 AM
5

Proof that personality is a meme
/r/BlackPillScience10/12/18 05:45 PM
3

Those are haplogroups. Each and every haplogroup originated from one individual that started the mutation. For example, there is one guy in the distant past that is responsible for I1 and all subclades.
/r/BlackPillScience10/12/18 03:43 PM
1

No. In reality, even if a woman has high earning potential, they still look for men with high earning potential. So it doesn’t matter if she has her own money. The rich want to get richer. Consistent with past research, men placed more emphasis on the item Good Looks, whereas women placed more importance on the item Good Financial Prospect. Contrary to the structural powerless model, women's expected income was positively related to ratings of the importance of a potential mate's earning capacit…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/18 10:07 PM
7

All that unsourced nonsense. There are still tons of guys who want marriage Yep. And not all men are equal. Do you think Becky would rather stay single, or marry Norman the 40 year old balding fatguy with a ponytail and mantits that works as a tattoo artist? Now suppose Brad the IT guy making $100k a year comes along. He's precisely average in looks and hasn't really landed many dates in his life but makes good money. Now which will Becky choose? The single life of cats or Brad? It's WAY less st…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 06:10 PM
4

That depends. MGTOW and Incel types certainly won't fare well in the casual sex department. But if they maximize their wealth and earning potential, they'll have the last laugh when it comes time for Becky to settle down and she's husband hunting. Women care far more about status on average than men do. So if she is unmarried by a certain age, it is HUGE status drop for her. But with marriage, she gets a status boost and by marrying a guy with wealth, she gets another status boost. With them poo…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 05:49 PM
1

There's a a couple studies at least that discuss this very topic. One such study deals with how the whole monogamy thing started in the first place, it was because low-status men withheld betabux from Becky when Chad was done pumping and dumping her. Low-ranked men said no thanks, and future generations of Beckys realized that their value to betabuxxers is based on her body count, as a low or nonexistent body count implies fidelity. From the study: This process is started when low-ranked males b…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/18 02:26 PM
3

"Observable difference" is a lot different from "progress". "Progress" is a value judgement, whereas observable difference is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 07:39 PM
3

Unless you are talking about improvements in technology, there is no objective, quantifiable definition for "progress". The argument you are making is moot.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 07:27 PM
6

This doesn't talk about LMR at all It's implied within Parental Investment Theory. Women act coy to discourage insincere attempts to get in their panties because they know the costs involved to them are high. That makes a hell of a lot more sense than MUH PATRIARCHY Without religion telling us that sex outside of marriage is a sin there's no need for women to act coy You're wrong again. The anthropological record indicates that approximately 85 per cent of human societies have permitted men to h…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 07:07 PM
1

>MUH PATRIARCHY >Not part of our evolutionary heritage because I said so! Oh boy. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/head-games/201305/the-allure-aggressive-men
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 06:21 PM
11

Chad does not suffer any penalty. In fact, breaking social norms seems to enhance his appeal.
/r/BlackPillScience06/12/18 06:17 PM
1

>"that's outdated!" current year argument X happened in the past, therefore it is invalid is a flawed argument. Running water was invented thousands of years ago, therefore it is invalid because it's current year. lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/18 06:14 PM
5

In other words, the one and only hurtle to equality is... women
/r/BlackPillScience06/12/18 05:41 PM
1

Although there are at least one or two studies posted here that suggests income inequality may mitigate female wallet hunting. But even of that I am a bit skeptical: if income inequality is reduced to near zero on the Gini Coefficient scale (impossible but this is a thought experiment), wouldn't then sexual selective pressures on men from women move from money to something else? like status?
/r/BlackPillScience06/12/18 05:21 PM
32

TL:DR If you are ugly, you get doubly penalized by women: once for breaking a norm, and second for being ugly, i.e. The Devil Effect
/r/BlackPillScience06/12/18 05:15 PM
2

Is Gattica becoming a reality?
/r/BlackPillScience05/12/18 12:55 AM
8

This has happened before. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/11615902/Most-European-men-descended-from-just-three-ancestors.html
/r/BlackPillScience04/12/18 05:12 PM
16

Evil implies that they have agency
/r/BlackPillScience04/12/18 05:11 PM
6

This is actually the FULL study that is referenced in the article by this post: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/8xs7v1/females_sex_partner_count_doubles_if_they_believe/ ​ It's about women lying about their partner counts, and the truth coming out when they believe they are hooked in to a lie detector.
/r/BlackPillScience04/12/18 05:08 PM
1

Here is the actual study that the article references: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3813768?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents ​ Full study: ​ https://sci-hub.tw/https://www.jstor.org/stable/3813768
/r/BlackPillScience04/12/18 05:05 PM
9

Very noble cope that I happen to agree with. The problem is that there are only two possible ways to achieve that, and both are extremely unlikely. You’d have to do it by force or by withholding betabux en masse. Given the amount of white knighting going on, men are too divided to act in the general interest of men. I was reading a paper that suggested that the way it was done in the very distant past was to withhold betabux. But that was back when betabux was in very high demand given the harsh…
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/18 08:06 PM
1

Yeah but it doesn't specify intrasex competition for which group of males. It's always the top 20%, even in a female-disadvantaged mating market. They just become bigger whores for Chad in female-disadvantaged markets.
/r/BlackPillScience03/12/18 03:45 PM
2

This makes me think. Since women demand more earning potential even if their own is high, wouldn’t that imply that a woman is at the top of the socioeconomic hierarchy rather than a man?
/r/BlackPillScience01/12/18 05:11 PM
1

Awesome, thank you. What are you using to bookmark these collections of studies by the way?
/r/BlackPillScience01/12/18 04:46 PM
5

What’s also important here is how they debunked the structural powerlessness model. Another bit of feminist nonsense bites the dust. Women will look for resource acquisition potential even if she expects to make tons of money herself (the rich want to get richer)
/r/BlackPillScience01/12/18 04:41 PM
5

Makes sense, but they have to be specifically looking for husbands (betabux). They only do this when they can no longer right the cock carousel per female dual mating strategy. So if you statusmax, you can get yourself a good used up gold digger
/r/BlackPillScience01/12/18 04:39 PM
2

Coercion, either by words or actions.
/r/BlackPillScience29/11/18 02:17 PM
3

Yes, it does. The conclusion of the other study is wrong since there is a direct relationship between guys that bully women and guys that have lots of sex
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 10:48 PM
5

You forgot to read the second paper that I linked to in these comments, didn’t you?
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 08:49 PM
3

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0126-4
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 06:57 PM
1

U wot m8?
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 05:37 PM
3

All things being equal, hoes look for dominance. Of course, that is considering all the guys in her dating pool are of equal attractiveness, which is almost never true. Take this study for example. They researched frat boys and concluded that looks don't matter but perceived dominance does. One problem with that: they're all frat boys and thus Chads. So of course when your dating pool is at minimum 8/10+ dudes, you're going to try to find some other way to narrow things down. ​ LMS wins
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 03:18 PM
2

Pretty huge in my opinion. This completely debunks the feminist argument that women dressing and acting like whores is somehow due to "patriarchy" when it is really them dressing and acting like whores for the wealthiest Chad she can secure.
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 03:11 PM
4

Source please
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 02:28 PM
13

But if you bully women in real life, you get rewarded with lots of sex! https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0126-4
/r/BlackPillScience28/11/18 02:13 PM
5

No offense but preferring chaste women is, from an evolutionary point of view, waaaaaaay way better than preferring promiscuous women I'm not about to disagree with that. That's why I pointed it out. Given the evidence, the "YAAASSS QUEEN SLAY" soyboys that worship skanks are only setting themselves up to be evolutionary dead ends.
/r/BlackPillScience20/11/18 06:20 PM
6

This paper is a gold mine: In mating systems where males invest parentally, selection should favor males who act to insure that their investment is directed toward their own offspring and not the offspring of another male. Sexual jealousy is one mechanism that has been proposed to increase paternity probability (Daly et al. 1982). Male sexual jealousy presumably functions to guard a mate and to dissuade intrasexual competitors, thus lowering the likelihood of alien insemination. Daly et al. (198…
/r/BlackPillScience20/11/18 06:01 PM
14

Well that sucks. You have to be good looking before foids ever care about your intelligence.
/r/BlackPillScience20/11/18 05:33 PM
22

I can understand now why Chad pumps and dumps. Bitches demand more than they are worth.
/r/BlackPillScience20/11/18 05:15 PM
6

So tell me how data mining can, within 95%+ accuracy, predict behavior if everyone is a unique little snowflake?
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 03:11 PM
4

“We’re all special little snowflakes teehee” Listen, faggot. If that were true, statistics or data mining within any degree of accuracy would be impossible. Stop being a bitch.
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 03:05 PM
4

Whoa, faggot. Getting a bit salty, aren't you?
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 02:31 PM
4

“I’m not like the other girls teehee”
/r/BlackPillScience05/11/18 05:46 AM
2

Here, since you are a mathematical mongoloid claiming to be an engineer, one of your fellow soyboys can explain how it literally fucking applies to everything. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCn8zs912OE
/r/BlackPillScience30/10/18 02:34 AM
3

It's the Pareto Principle, of which Zipf's Law is a subset and literally applies to everything, everywhere. No one knows why, it just does. Dating is not somehow magically exempt from it. This guy explains to concept easily enough, demonstrating that power laws like the Pareto Principle even apply to language and the words that you use. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fCn8zs912OE
/r/BlackPillScience30/10/18 02:27 AM
2

I’m not the one getting all asshurt over mathematical rules. The dating market is an economy and is therefore subject to the same principles that govern any other economy. Learn 2 maths faggot
/r/BlackPillScience30/10/18 02:18 AM
2

The Pareto Principle applies to everything, including language, which is why it is a mathematical law. Your hurt feefees don’t suddenly exempt you from it.
/r/BlackPillScience30/10/18 02:14 AM
2

The Pareto Principle. It's a power law, dumbass.
/r/BlackPillScience30/10/18 02:06 AM
8

There is no incentive, but that doesn't mean the elite with power won't try to sell you a pile of shit as a pot of gold. The latest sales pitches are that cuckoldry is awesome and healthy and that women care about men's issues. None of that is even remotely true, but they peddle it anyway. Low-ranked normalfags need to be made to believe that women are angelic creatures that only desire world peace and shit, and that they are somehow wiser and more restrained than men so those faggots will go an…
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/18 07:57 PM
4

Just look up the Gini Coefficient for online dating. It's very close to 0.6, which is EXACTLY the 80/20 rule. The trick here is that normalfags will argue that online dating/Tinder is not real life, which is of course bullshit. Online dating is easily quantifiable and this has Blue Pillers shitting their pants with damage control and they retort with MUH FEEFEES and "I know some guy" anecdotal horseshit.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/18 07:44 PM
2

A mathematical law isn’t a wild assumption. It’s fact.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/18 07:34 PM
3

That’s a snapshot of a point in time. If you leave something alone for long enough, it’ll settle on 80/20. Also looking at the numbers there, it doesn’t debunk the Pareto Principle.
/r/BlackPillScience29/10/18 07:33 PM
2

They are using violent socialist revolutionaries so that they become the CIA and Corporate elite's enforcers.
/r/MGTOW29/10/18 04:25 PM
4

Here's is how it works: women are made the enforcers for the powers that be (people like the Rockefellers, and other old money). But here is the gotcha: unlike male enforcers, women can play victim. Women can brings their betabux and orbiters in with them to help with enforcement of the Elites' will (think #MeToo movement, that has already taken down some big names). They then have enforcers inside each and every home, office, school, church and everyone aspect of life. The ultimate goal is to d…
/r/MGTOW29/10/18 04:23 PM
2

She can smell Chad from miles away
/r/BlackPillScience24/08/18 11:47 AM
19

Interstingly, this same behavior is observed in chimpanzees. The more they bully the females, the more sex they get https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141113122939.htm
/r/BlackPillScience24/08/18 11:46 AM
1

tbh I think the only way to win here would be for men to create the illusion of scarcity. The sex ratio is roughly 1:1 but foids believe the sex ratio favors them. Why? Because the same desperate soyboys and IT neckbeards M'Lady their way to anything with a vagina giving foids far more attention than is deserved. They even give them money without even requiring pussy in exchange. So we have to continue to shame cucks and bugmen until enough men find their balls and dignity to stop the attention …
/r/BlackPillScience17/08/18 03:53 PM
6

Good stuff. In additional to finding the male coalitions interesting (and how it is less zero sum for men), I also found this interesting: We review evidence of these patterns, including evidence that female body dissatisfaction and pathological eating patterns increase when women perceive an unfavorable sex ratio (i.e., shortage of eligible men). What I got from that is that the excessive amount of fatties in the US and the UK could be due to a favorable male-female sex ratio (favorable for foi…
/r/BlackPillScience16/08/18 05:38 PM
8

Gen Z will be at about 25%. The following generation (I think it is Gen Alpha) will be at ~15%. It seems to drop roughly 10% per generation. Really a few more generation and no one will be married except for maybe the ultra-religious.
/r/MGTOW10/08/18 04:29 PM
3

Absolutely feminists lie. It should also be noted that modern feminism is a CIA operation that was co-opted from Soviet agents trying to trash American society. So now the CIA is using as a means of control. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/opinion/commentary/ct-gloria-steinem-cia-20151025-story.html https://rense.com/general21/hw.htm https://www.greanvillepost.com/2017/10/01/did-the-cia-use-gloria-steinem-to-subvert-the-feminist-movement/
/r/MGTOW03/08/18 06:30 PM
3

What an absolute dumpster fire shit show.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/18 05:17 PM
2

>awkward >has kids Bitch you weren't awkward those times when you spread your legs hoe.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/18 05:15 PM
4

She's so old school that she's a single mom. OLD SCHOOL AS FUCK
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/18 05:12 PM
5

Reminder https://i.imgur.com/R0DgjkL.png
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/18 05:04 PM
2

Case in point https://babe.net/2017/12/26/you-should-sleep-with-at-least-25-guys-before-settling-down-and-ill-tell-you-exactly-why-26107
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/18 04:58 PM
1

Is it true that divorce kills your credit score?
/r/MGTOW17/07/18 04:39 PM
2

Absolutely degenerate. This is what society has come to.
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 09:34 PM
1

"Women hate harmless men" https://www.intellectualtakeout.org/article/clinical-psychologist-women-hate-harmless-men
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 02:09 PM
1

As people they really have nothing to offer that I can't get from a guy. They're even terrible at being friends. They're flaky, moody, and unreliable. And they're definitely vapid. Really they are just wombs.
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 01:34 PM
3

All that is a trap. It's to lure you in. Many predators in the wild have pretty colors but they're hiding a deadly creature.
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 01:31 PM
1

All this roastie projection
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 01:13 PM
1

lol she has that crazy mentally ill roastie look, especially with those "problem glasses".
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 01:07 PM
2

That's definitely a tranny
/r/MGTOW13/07/18 03:48 AM
5

Yes but they were trained to believe that is ok by many simps giving in and giving them what they want. These bitches see their friends do it and it working, so they go and do it.
/r/MGTOW13/07/18 03:44 AM
51

>patient, considerate, kind Translation: "I've ridden the cock carousel for a long time now and need a beta cuck to put up with my childlike tantrums and behavior, and to pay for me"
/r/MGTOW10/07/18 03:07 PM
1

'>Current Year + 3 '>going to cuckchan /r9k/ which is full of normalfags '>not going to 8chan /r9k/ instead
/r/MGTOW09/03/18 03:54 PM
3

It's the Pareto Principle.
/r/MGTOW08/03/18 03:26 PM
9

While women striking for a day would be an inconvenience, all civilization would collapse if 90% of men decided not to show up for work. -The stock market would fail -no manufacturing -almost no military -almost no government -no products to stores -almost no food being grown or slaughtered -internet infrastructure would fail -infrastructure in general not maintained Really we would be back in the stone age in an instant without 90% of men.
/r/MGTOW28/02/18 08:09 PM
2

Wow, an entire day of child neglect by mothers refusing to feed and care for their children.
/r/MGTOW28/02/18 08:05 PM
2

Men never seemed inherently better at anything but hauling hay. Wew lad. I had quite the laugh at that one. This chick is just as delusional as any other feminist. Yeah, I would say there is a tad bit more to building and maintaining civilization than just hauling hay, girly.
/r/MGTOW23/02/18 05:18 PM
2

In other words, women can only sell their pussy and not merit
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 06:09 AM
3

Yet another equality fail. Women’s breasts evolved the way they did because they are inherently SEXUAL (i.e. to attract a mate), whereas men’s are not. There is no other female mammal with pertruding breasts like that of the human female. This IS a matter of public decency.
/r/MGTOW14/01/18 04:15 AM
2

Women are so easy to understand. Child like behavior + mental illnesses = woman
/r/MGTOW12/01/18 05:32 AM
3

Holy shit this guy. If he wants kids just fly to Thailand and knock up a few hoes and then fly home. What a soyboy.
/r/MGTOW12/01/18 05:29 AM
3

Been planning on downloading this. Although I will point out that 2D females are far superior to 3DPD
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 07:18 PM
5

Fun fact: pussy hats started out in anime, which most feminists detest because anime girls are more interesting than real ones. https://orig00.deviantart.net/70a5/f/2015/315/8/a/liru_wolf0006_by_lunk321-d9gbxp5.jpg
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 07:14 PM
2

That doesn't make it any less degenerate.
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 05:31 PM
3

It's all in the same degenerate category: swinging, cuckoldry, open relationships.
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 05:30 PM
7

They’re really pushing this cuckolding thing.
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 03:01 PM
3

Pretty sure Russia and China don’t let gays and feelings and different “genders” into their military. Guess I should brush up on my Chinese or Russian.
/r/MGTOW11/01/18 01:59 PM
22

She would have been better off not going to university. Moral of the story for women: Don’t go to college Don’t waste your youth and fertility Don’t ride the CC Suddenly your value will go way up in the eyes of men. No one wants to marry your used up CC ass with a worthless degree and $70k in debt. That shit is a reverse dowry
/r/MGTOW10/01/18 08:08 PM
5

NAWALT is just a guy thinking with his dick. AWALT is universal, and comes in differing degrees. It’s a spectrum. Some females are clearly more mentally ill than others.
/r/MGTOW10/01/18 01:58 AM
13

It's AWALT for all generations of women all over the world. The difference between Asian women then and Asian women now is that their lives are more comfortable, so they can afford to to ride the CC before settling down with a provider. Your mother's generation of Asian women skipped the CC and went right for the provider because life wasn't as secure for them.
/r/MGTOW09/01/18 04:52 PM
1

They try to project an "alpha" vibe to make guys think she is "in demand", to make up for the fact that she's a hamplanet. It's a coping mechanism.
/r/MGTOW06/01/18 11:34 PM
16

Feminists posting dumb shit without my consent is mind-rape.
/r/MGTOW06/01/18 11:25 PM
8

anime has always been woke Not like the Hollywood/Disney trash
/r/MGTOW03/01/18 06:40 PM
6

YESSSS!!! I love Konosuba!!!
/r/MGTOW03/01/18 06:39 PM
19

And each time he kisses her, he’ll taste hundreds of cocks
/r/MGTOW02/01/18 07:34 PM
2

No such thing.
/r/MGTOW02/01/18 05:20 PM
5

I don't get why this dude didn't just kick this bitch to the curb as soon as she handed him this. He comes off desperate. And what's worse, he's bragging about it on his twatter account.
/r/MGTOW02/01/18 05:19 PM
1

Wrong. Something bad happened right in the first pic.
/r/MGTOW28/12/17 02:36 PM
2

Stop giving a shit if you are or aren’t. You are letting females have power over you by even giving it any brain power
/r/MGTOW28/12/17 02:28 PM
1

“I just ran off with your money, dumbass. Surprise!”
/r/MGTOW27/12/17 12:47 AM
3

How do females hold to mutually exclusive ideas in their heads? I don’t get it.
/r/MGTOW26/12/17 02:05 PM
3

You must be from IncelTears. You can fuck right off back to that cuckshed
/r/MGTOW26/12/17 02:08 AM
4

They are really pushing this cuck thing
/r/MGTOW25/12/17 11:58 PM
2

I love stuff like this. You see the true nature of men and women in a primitive setting. Modern urbanization just veils the true nature of women. This is what our Hunter-Gatherer ancestors went through. The one leader used MGTOW to bring the women in line but the betas broke his plan.
/r/MGTOW23/12/17 05:37 PM
1

A female can lose weight. We can’t gain height. She’s the piece of shit
/r/MGTOW23/12/17 06:02 AM
53

Fun fact: there were never any “good” women. Your use of good in this context implies virtue, but all virtues are masculine abstractions. Women don’t behave according to male abstractions. They behave according to their primitive programming. Women are not complex like men are. Their programming tells them to get good genes from a male and then secure resources for the child. Often times good genes and resources don’t come from the same male. So she goes shopping with her pussy as currency. Wome…
/r/MGTOW22/12/17 02:24 PM
8

Because white knights
/r/MGTOW22/12/17 01:32 PM
5

Predicting the future, or laying out the plan?
/r/MGTOW21/12/17 02:42 PM
0

Some breeds are more prone to violence and random violence, though. Pit Bull is one of them.
/r/MGTOW20/12/17 03:27 PM
3

I have mixed feelings about this. Even though she looks like a retard likely to mistreat dogs, Pit Bulls are fucking dangerous and can attack even their owner randomly. They're like wild animals. They're bred for pure aggression. Their breed exists because of dog fighting. Maybe some of you have different experiences, but I sure as fuck wouldn't let kids go near one.
/r/MGTOW20/12/17 02:43 PM
5

Jesus, they really can't meme for shit. I also noticed them trying to act cool by using right-wing insults and memes, calling rightists "cucks". It's like a hamplanet calling a skinny guy a fatty.
/r/MGTOW20/12/17 02:31 PM
2

When you don't feel like being a mom, just put the kid in front of the TV!
/r/MGTOW19/12/17 03:51 PM
1

Dual Mating Strategy. OF COURSE she keeps the betas around. Someone's gotta play janitor to Chad and Tyrone's mess.
/r/MGTOW15/12/17 11:52 PM
1

Who the fuck takes advice from porn stars?
/r/MGTOW14/12/17 09:23 PM
2

Son, you best be talkin' about 8ch /pol/ not cuckchan /pol/
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 07:48 PM
1

I don't know what you are talking about. There have only ever been three Star Wars movies. Tragically, George Lucas passed away immediately after Return of the Jedi and there was no more Star Wars. Stop spreading this wild conspiracy theory that other Star Wars movies exist.
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 07:47 PM
7

Briffault's Law in action. A woman has no sense of honor or loyalty, so at any given time, she doesn't feel that she owes you anything.
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 07:22 PM
11

70 days in prison for staring at a woman http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/15622122.Man_jailed_for_creepily_staring_at_Glasgow_pharmacy_assistant_through_window/
/r/MGTOW13/12/17 07:19 PM
1

wymyn are stronk. Which is why they need male allies to do their heavy lifting by white knighting for them in the world of politics. Because wymyn are powerful and capable on their own. The fact that they feel oppressed is simply a manifestation of their inferiority complex. They know they are not on par with men, either in ability or effort put in, so they move goal posts. Example Feminist: "Gender equality!" Guy: "Yes, women should also register for the draft!" Feminist moving goal posts: "The…
/r/MGTOW12/12/17 09:42 PM
1

How would we do that?
/r/MGTOW11/12/17 12:05 AM
44

Reminder https://www.mensfitness.com/women/dating-advice/are-you-her-back-plan
/r/MGTOW10/12/17 11:53 PM
1

Yep. Feminists are alienating men everywhere. It’s because of them that we can offer men an alternative. Feminism will help us deprive women of what they crave the most: attention and validation. Then there will be a power shift.
/r/MGTOW09/12/17 03:45 PM
3

“Never interrupt your enemy while he is making a mistake” -Napoleon Let me explain why this is a good thing. This serves only to widen the battle of the sexes and alienate men from women. I don’t know about you, but I can deal just fine without even speaking to a female. Women on the other hand crave attention and validation. So what will happen when men suddenly stop talking to women out of fear of legal reprisal?
/r/MGTOW08/12/17 05:55 PM
9

Maybe if I try to poke fun at MGTOW I’ll finally get laid Regards, typical IncelTears guy
/r/MGTOW08/12/17 03:19 PM
3

I’m not going to say male feminists don’t get laid. I’m sure plenty do. But there is something just so dishonest about them. That’s their game, their strategy. They’ll shit all over guys and manipulate women. While I don’t really care about the latter, they are still dishonest twats with no sense of loyalty. They are like women.
/r/MGTOW08/12/17 03:16 PM
60

Sorry man. I couldn’t finish reading that. This is the kind of shit single moms put their sons through to punish the Chad that impregnated her and chucked her
/r/MGTOW07/12/17 07:37 PM
3

It’s the logical conclusion when society is so comforting to women, with little consequences to their actions. Women in poorer nations are less shallow and more wiling to accept providers. Here they reject providers until they have no options remaining.
/r/MGTOW06/12/17 10:29 PM
4

Yeah but even 8/pol/ gets butthurt at MGTOW threads. I’ve been accused of D&C
/r/MGTOW06/12/17 12:52 AM
29

She’s more legit than any of these thots. Mainly because she has been Post wall for quite some time, no kids, so no one wants to bang her. She can only get so far attention whoring, so she has to put out quality material
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 11:43 PM
27

I hate e-celebs so damn much
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 11:41 PM
28

Because she’s an attention whore and she’s doing the same shit Zoe Quinn did
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 11:39 PM
5

Even /pol/ has their white knights
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 11:38 PM
14

It’s CURRENT YEAR and guys are still taking hoes at face value. Will we never progress?
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 08:41 PM
10

How about they just go away? No one invited them. They're only there for Betabux from thirsty white knights that will donate to their Patreon or PayPal. She and the other trad-thots need to fuck right off
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 08:17 PM
31

That bitch ain't 22.
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 08:10 PM
43

No, Lauren, we want you to fuck off. Go be with the feminists. The Left. I don't give a fuck. Just go away.
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 08:09 PM
2

This is what you get when feminists (or females in general) infiltrate a movement. They play off the NAWALT “I’m not like the other girls” bullshit. The worst example is probably Electre from France. She did hardcore porn and is now a “traditionalist” with lots of orbiters
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 02:56 PM
1

holy shit... just look at some of the commenters and their twitter timelines.... https://twitter.com/ScottWarrick93/status/937427533372559360 Repeat after me: TRADTHOTS
/r/MGTOW05/12/17 02:22 PM
1

Proves the female dual mating strategy. She wants you for love and money, but wants Chad’s cock on the side
/r/MGTOW04/12/17 04:28 PM
11

Tradthots are upset because feminists are ruining their supply of beta orbiters in addition to putting females back on track to submission. Feminists are making men cringe so badly that even the attractive guys at work won’t even look at them anymore. Men are practical. They CYA. No CEO wants litigation or negative attention. No more fraternizing on the company dime.
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 05:14 AM
26

lol honestly just go with it. They’re screwing themselves over. Feminists will be #metooing their way back into the kitchen with how they are pushing men away. The tradthots are upset because they know feminists are messing with their Beta orbiter gravy train.
/r/MGTOW01/12/17 05:09 AM
5

I don’t see a problem here. Men ought to make sure women are criminalizing courtship. It would get us that much closer to separation. Let those strong independent wymyn be strong and independent ... without us. Enjoy!
/r/MGTOW30/11/17 02:51 PM
1

Bitches wouldn’t do it if it didn’t work. There’s always a sucker
/r/MGTOW29/11/17 12:36 AM
2

He’s not very self-aware. By declaring that it is men’s responsibility to fix things, he is affirming his own toxic masculinity and that wymyn are completely incapable and have no agency ;)
/r/MGTOW28/11/17 07:18 PM
1

He’s right. Men do need to step up. It’s time to permanently cancel office parties and other social outings. Absolutely no alcohol. All meetings that are mixed sex must be open door and on camera. All mingling must be solely work related. Those who flirt terminated, male or female. Time to crack down.
/r/MGTOW28/11/17 07:16 PM
1

her British WEW LAD
/r/MGTOW27/11/17 07:02 PM
8

What the fuck are you doing, Harry? You could have any bitch in the world. Literally any. And you opt for a post-wall leftover? What the fuck, dude?
/r/MGTOW27/11/17 03:15 PM
59

This is great, but you know Reddit is just itching to ban us. They’ll keep changing the rules as we grow until they come up with a rule that will be easy to break. Then ban. We’re a threat to the system. Men need to be kept docile and servile.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 04:04 PM
1

“Who hurt you?” Bitch you did with that low-IQ question. I think I lost some brain cells.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 04:00 PM
5

This is actually great. Feminism is creating a hostile environment between men and women. The more men that see this, the more who will go MGTOW. At this pace, men will segregate themselves away from women, completely lose faith in them.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 03:07 PM
4

Just cancel all parties. Harassment allegations don’t just pop up when alcohol is present.
/r/MGTOW23/11/17 02:47 PM
3

Yet she will still open her legs for many alphas and take a steamy dump on the beta. Over and and over again. Without fail.
/r/MGTOW22/11/17 01:58 PM
1

Women are never grateful. Ever. Briffault’s Law. Even in war they will betray you.
/r/MGTOW22/11/17 04:40 AM
3

That shit does not belong at work. Keep the drama to yourself, hoe.
/r/MGTOW22/11/17 02:32 AM
1

You get the 80/20 rule, called the Pareto Principle, when you leave something untouched by human hands. It is a natural law, so all things with causes and effects fall into this over time. What the cause of it is, in terms of human sexuality, is a democratization of sex; i.e. sexual liberation. Since men and women are free to do as they please with sex (since sexuality is no longer controlled) it will naturally end in Pareto Efficiency (80/20 rule)
/r/MGTOW21/11/17 07:18 PM
1

The 80/20 rule is called the Pareto Principle and it IS natural. It is what happens when humans don't interfere. When 80/20 is achieved, it is called Pareto Efficiency. A subset of this natural law is another natural law called Zipf's Law.
/r/MGTOW21/11/17 07:15 PM
8

This is great. Look at her backpedaling on each point. She begins with a major anti-feminist problem with feminism that it is a cancer, but virtue signals at the end to look good for her feminist friends, who also likely feel the same, but maintain the fiction for appearances. Feminism is like Santa Claus. It is a fiction maintained for appearances and a shared collective experience. "My parents didn't get me the present I wanted, but OF COURSE I BELIEVE IN SANTA CLAUS!"
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 07:35 PM
1

She's just throwing a tantrum. It's how you know MGTOW and similar ideologies are winning.
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 06:51 PM
1

The amount of degrees and accolades you have isn't going to make my dick any harder. Why can't women understand this? They're wasting their time trying to be more attractive to Chad when Chad doesn't give a fuck either. And he certainly won't be marrying her.
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 06:08 PM
5

Humanity has always been retarded, which is why social order and monogamy were necessary to make producers out of retards. Now they are free to be retarded again.
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 05:58 PM
43

By Allah, I hope he bathes her in diarrhea
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 05:38 PM
29

"virgin model" She's a prostitute. Why is the media not pointing this out? And while she may still have her hymen (not likely), it doesn't mean she hasn't sucked miles of cock and had her asshole prolapsed several times by Chad and Tyrone.
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 05:37 PM
9

Dear feminist, You are not entitled to men. Our bodies, our lives, our choice. Kindly fuck off.
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 03:56 PM
4

There’s no obligation to even interact with them or even be around them. They aren’t entitled to men.
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 03:54 PM
2

Listen cocksmoker. There is no “karma”. That’s the Just World fallacy. And in case you haven’t noticed, marriages are way down, divorced are way up, and the birth rate in the West is the worst it has ever been, to the point where some assholes at the top think it is cute to import hordes of third worlders instead of fixing the actual fucking problems. But maybe you are right about one thing: this shit is unsustainable. Feminists are digging themselves into a deeper hole with every passing minute…
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 03:01 PM
1

OP is right. Wagecucking only feeds the Beast. The State needs you to be a good little paying bitchboy betabux. Just keep paying in money to the State and Corporations. Good boy.
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 05:05 PM
2

It was bound to happen sooner or later. Western Civilization has become cancerous with its descent into nihilism.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 01:58 PM
2

Given the amount of crackdowns on free speech, the likes I have never seen before, I think this is part of a much larger plan under the guise of advertiser friendliness to subvert all of Western Civilization. Who knew liberalism could be so totalitarian?
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 01:11 PM
-24

What kind of man hides behind women like a little bitch? "Him" apparently.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 12:58 AM
-25

Says the socialist tranny
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 12:57 AM
-14

Literally him
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 12:55 AM
-34

Wherever there is Chad’s cum in a vagina, you will be there to eat it out.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 12:32 AM
-22

Source: your ass
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 12:29 AM
8

I prefer the black pill. Women cannot be fixed. Only their damage minimized.
/r/MGTOW08/11/17 12:27 AM
3

Nah even those are fake.
/r/MGTOW07/11/17 05:57 PM
32

lol modern life is such a freak show. Thanks great grandpa for giving thots the right to vote
/r/MGTOW06/11/17 12:48 PM
27

I don’t know how women in India are, but ones that live in the West absolutely screw around. One of my sister’s friends is Indian and I heard her bragging how she got fucked by 10 dudes in one week, as her parents are trying to marry her off
/r/MGTOW05/11/17 11:20 PM
29

“Priya” sounds like a Pajeet. She’s cheating on her husband with a white guy. Curry women are some of the absolute worst. Hypergamous as fuck
/r/MGTOW05/11/17 11:02 PM
1

Also want to point out that this is how feminism makes enemies. It made a lot of enemies in metal when they tried to infiltrate. Same with comics, video games (Gamer Gate) And it is also how they play their victim card. “Misogynist backlash”
/r/MGTOW05/11/17 10:07 PM
1

There is nothing in anime that triggers feminists more than moë. They hate it. Especially Cute Girls Doing Cute Things. Like Kiniro Mosaic. It is the most anti-feminist genre
/r/MGTOW05/11/17 10:01 PM
16

I have noticed a push by the mainstream media last couple of years for open relationships and open marriage. We’re going back to harems and barbarity. There is no progress to be had here.
/r/MGTOW05/11/17 05:14 PM
78

Don’t forget that she eventually marries a betabux and hides the priceless jewel from him while he slaves away being a wagecuck so she can live a comfortable life
/r/MGTOW04/11/17 05:11 PM
3

You don’t need to necessarily be a theist to find the wisdom in the Bible useful. Christianity has become feminized these days with all that “God loves unconditionally teehee” and “God doesn’t have a gender” bullshit.
/r/MGTOW01/11/17 02:38 PM
19

Britain is known for its white knighting government and judges
/r/MGTOW31/10/17 05:15 PM
8

What “Feminist” really means: my vagina only belongs to Chad. Source: see Emma Watson
/r/MGTOW30/10/17 04:25 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter