TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

incisive_shadow55 Archive

View 8 posts and 167 comments by incisive_shadow55 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
18

It’s common in the criminal courts too!
/r/MensRights02/05/26 11:47 AM
5

It's called red pill rage and is a normal transitional part of the process. When you've been lied to all of your life is it a surprise some people get mad? They'll pass through it.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 02:28 PM
1

Not sure what I’m supposedly projecting.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 08:37 PM
1

I’m the first to admit I love women. At least the red pill is reality.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 08:30 PM
1

FemaleDatingStrategies Lol makes sense. Love and hate are two sides of the same coin
/r/MensRights27/12/21 08:18 PM
2

Literally working on a case right now where we’ve done just that. We even found proof that the prosecutors and police withheld evidence showing the false accuser lied. We’ll push ahead but I doubt anything will come of it given the prosecutors are in on it too. Wish us luck.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:43 PM
2

Nonsense. The reason women falsely accuse men is because they know they will face no repercussions and the criminal justice system is gynocentric.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:29 PM
1

I literally did. I gave you further study to do. Come back once you’ve fairly considered both sides.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:22 PM
2

We were talking about false allegations. Not rapes. Nice try.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:08 PM
3

Point to where I agreed to a debate? You asked a question, I answered. I was also kind enough to point you in the right direction using an individual who did more for the safeguarding of women than any modern feminist.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 07:03 PM
3

I don't care. I pointing you in the direction of further study.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:59 PM
5

Because it's predominantly men being accused. A conviction isn't necessary. The allegation itself is enough to ruin him for the rest of his life. Not to forget that due process isn't afforded to men who are accused. They are assumed guilty until proven innocent.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:57 PM
2

Look at Erin Pizzeys work. She built the first domestic violence shelter in the world for women.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:52 PM
2

Incorrect. The mortality rate of women as victims of domestic violence is statistically insignificant relative to the mortality rate of men. The majority of domestic violence is consensual. Both parties beat on each other and it’s almost always the woman that initiates.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:49 PM
9

Over 95% of false allegations (of any crime) are made by women. Yet they are prosecuted in less than 1% of cases.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:46 PM
5

Women initiate violence in 70% of domestic assaults yet the narrative always paints women as the victims and men as the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights27/12/21 06:40 PM
2

This is known as the “rationalisation hamster”. Literally anything and everything will be reversed to place the blame back on men. The cognitive dissonance would be too strong otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/12/21 02:44 PM
1

So? His career hasn’t got anything to do with it. Now you’re advocating for cancel culture which I also don’t agree with. He was convicted, took his punishment, apologised to Rihanna and since then the two have rekindled their friendship. There’s nothing more to say on the matter. I don’t advocate for life long witch hunts.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:58 PM
1

Course it was. Look at the news article published about him at the time. Are you seriously trying to compare the two as if they are the same? You need to be honest here.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:40 PM
1

Well Chris Brown wasn't given a free pass. He was convicted and his reputation tarnished for years. What you mean is Amber Heard got the free pass for being a woman despite the overwhelming evidence she was the primary perpetrator. She even became a figurehead for the #metoo movement and now charges 30k to give one hour talks about domestic violence.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:25 PM
2

I agree. I think both the accuser and the accused should be scrutinised equally with no bias one way or the other. Yes and there’s amber heard and Johnny depp. The situation is getting worse each and every year.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:59 PM
2

Ok, well unfortunately if cases are going unreported then we don’t actually know if they are genuine cases or not. People lie for all kinds of reasons. I’m sorry to hear that. Fortunately, this doesn’t happen in the UK. The police automatically believe everything women say and the men who are accused are treated as if they are guilty until they prove themselves innocent.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:42 PM
1

Quote me on where I said this?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:39 PM
1

I believe in due process. What I or you feel about the situation is irrelevant. Everyone has a legal right to a fair trial and the burden is ALWAYS on the prosecution to prove their case beyond all reasonable doubt. This means that the jury must be sure a crime took place before convicting. This applies across the board to all crimes. Rape should not be treated any differently. So you would be happy with countless rapists getting away with it just as long as that one innocent guy doesn't go to j…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:31 PM
2

I disagree. The presence of DNA doesn’t prove they committed a crime nor is there matching DNA in a lot of murder cases anyway. In the UK, roughly 60% of rape cases that make it to trial end in a conviction. So this idea that rapists are always getting away with it is a lie.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:27 PM
2

It’s hard to prove almost ALL crimes, not just rape. And that’s the point. The burden is supposed to be incredibly high to prevent the wrongful conviction of an innocent.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:21 PM
2

With zero evidence in most cases that these individuals are even victims. It’s a dangerous movement with political ends in mind to undermine the lawful practice of due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:17 PM
2

With zero evidence in most cases that these individuals are even victims. It’s a dangerous movement with political ends in mind to undermine the lawful practice of due process and the presumption of innocence until proven given beyond all reasonable doubt.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:17 PM
2

Rubbish. I’m from the UK and it’s every single day almost. Even the Sarah Everard tragedy was hijacked by feminists to further their political agenda. There were even calls to have men tagged and curfewed. Disgraceful. Open your eyes.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 04:15 PM
4

No I’m not talking about that. That’s a total non issue. One example is turn on the news and see how many times they go on about female empowerment in one week vs how many times they do the same for men. With regards to domestic violence look at how this is categorised as a “gendered” issue rather than a human issue. Whenever they discuss men’s problems notice how they deflect blame back onto men (victim blaming) and claim it’s because men don’t talk or because masculinity is toxic rather than a…
/r/MensRights13/06/21 12:10 PM
3

Oh come on. You think there is no political movement behind feminism now?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 10:13 AM
4

I suppose all statistics can be manipulated however there isn’t a huge political machine behind the men’s rights movement trying to control the cultural narrative.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 12:47 AM
4

I didn't say it wasn't. But it's one of the only things we ever hear about and the statistics are always exaggerated and bastardised. There are other issues that affect other people. Feminists need to learn that. Obviously they'll never change as the feminist movement is worth multiple billions. They don't want to be sharing the money.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 08:09 PM
5

Yes they were really false. The women only admitted to lying when they were asked to take a polygraph. Some of them admitted they lied as soon as they were told they needed to take the lie detector and others only admitted it after they failed the test. I’ll see if I can find the link. Bullshit, women largely only engage in relationships with men as long as the man provides for her i.e he can be controlled into giving and doing things for her. The trouble with feminists is your theory is total n…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:36 PM
3

In your situation that may be true. But it’s not the main reason serious attacks on women are statistically negligible.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:30 PM
6

Yes you are projecting. Badly.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:27 PM
7

And women lie about rape all the time. There was a study conducted in the US air force that found that 60% of rape allegations made by female officers against male officers were false. Just like with what you're doing now it's a totally exaggerated issue. Why do feminists love to exaggerate this issue? Power and control over men. Yes, it's true men can physically control women BUT it is women who can psychologically control men. This is all the feminist movement is- the societal control of men o…
/r/MensRights12/06/21 07:00 PM
8

Some men would do that. Not most. In fact, it's men who have prevented you from being raped or harmed in any way for the overwhelming majority of your life. It is men who stand ground and fight and die to keep women and children safe. Once again, you focus ONLY on the one thing that fits your narrative and simply ignore everything else. Like a true radical.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:56 PM
10

So this is why you can ONLY see it from one point of view. Makes a lot of sense.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:52 PM
2

What you are describing is toxic gender roles and gynocentrism in a nutshell. Nothing whatsoever to do with masculinity.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:50 PM
7

So you're proving that gynocentrism has always existed. Which is the whole purpose of this sub.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:48 PM
11

That's not the point. The point is you're being indirectly labelled a potential paedophile without having done anything wrong.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 06:34 PM
4

I agree. There are a few self proclaimed feminists who get it though. Christina Hoff Summers is a good example. However, she’s largely rejected by mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 12:36 PM
6

Toxic masculinity is nothing more than a misnomer used to push blame back onto men and our biology rather than put the blame where it belongs: with society. Men are trained not to ask for help or express ourselves not because of toxic masculinity but because our societal role is to be disposable and serve the gynocentric machine. “True feminists” would not even be using the term and would recognise the gynocentric nature of our society.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 12:00 PM
1

Lol women are not mentally or psychologically stronger than men. What a stupid thing to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/21 08:21 PM
2

Are you awaiting trial?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 08:17 PM
12

That’s total horseshit. You are focusing on a very small number of men who are MGTOW and claim that’s all of them. I know several MGTOW guys who are married (not legally) and have children, have great social lives, very successful in career/entrepreneurship etc. Hell a few of them are actually public figures. They are literally some of the happiest guys I know. “Swallow your pride and use trickery”... so now you advocate deception and being a pussy? How about just don’t get legally married? Sign…
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:59 AM
5

A MGTOW-style life really is the only safe option for men though. Anything else and you’re putting a gun to your own head.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:37 AM
9

They talk about it to raise awareness so other men can be helped. It’s like a cancer survivor raising awareness about cancer.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:27 AM
1

Personally, I would say most instances which constitute “rape” today have little long term damaging affect versus a man who’s life has been torn to shreds by a false rape allegation. So in most cases, yes.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 03:33 PM
9

Oh I see what you’re saying. Yes, fair enough.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:47 PM
12

I hope you enjoy the downvotes
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:46 PM
26

Correct. And he still got royally screwed over by the media and corrupt UK courts.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:11 PM
7

It says very clearly that he was a rape victim in the article. The headline is irrelevant. Who cares.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:30 PM
29

Red Pill Isolation. We all understand it. That’s why these communities are so important.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 07:00 PM
1

There's been no debate. You've totally failed to back up anything you've said and you've relied entirely on anecdotes which you most likely fabricated. Provide one piece of evidence that you have attacked a feminist subreddit (or anything else similar) in the same manner in which you attacked me? I'm still waiting. I'm sure you can't because you've never done it. And here's the thing you about you. On the surface you claim to be against feminism. I'm not surprised, feminism is absolutely indefen…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:31 PM
1

And I’m not bothered by groups like Female Dating Strategies. The stuff they push isn’t new and is just recycled from the days of “The Rules” If those women want to follow that advice they’ll just end up with low value men who can’t stand up for themselves. In the long run they’ll end up miserable (just like all “The Rules” girls did). I don’t cross paths with these women as they are being taught to screen out guys like me (who have self respect) anyway.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:17 PM
1

Judges are not allowed to remove people’s legal rights. However there have been many cases where they have. There is no evidence the “vicious” lawyer behaved in this way towards women. There’s no financial incentive nor have you provided any proof. What comment have I made to you that makes you suggest I’m spewing “hatred”? You’ve asked questions and I’ve given factual answers that you can’t refute. You just don’t like what I’m saying and as someone else has correctly pointed out you started to …
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:13 PM
1

I literally have zero rage. You asked for facts, I gave you facts and then you got offended and started personally attacking me and misrepresenting me. Your personal story actually just proved my point. I’m still waiting for you to show me ONE example of you going onto a feminist page and attacking a feminist in the same way you attacked me.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:59 PM
81

They’ll just abuse you for raising things like this and start calling you an “incel”
/r/MensRights21/04/21 04:46 PM
276

This is also why male victims of DV never come forward. The woman will just flip the script onto him and he’ll be arrested yet everybody wonders why men never speak out.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 02:39 PM
93

And they acknowledge repeated failings when they had the opportunity to support him
/r/MensRights21/04/21 02:03 PM
1

I’ve been with well over a 100 women and I’m nonmonogamous so I’m always dating at least 2-4 at any one time. Including right now. All the women I date are hot and low drama. The women I’ve been with have ranged from doctors to lawyers to models. I’ve even dated someone who is a minor celebrity with a large social media presence. Oh and she was hot too. Funny how you make so many assumptions yet you couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s generally the more unfortunate looking women who end up …
/r/MensRights21/04/21 11:10 AM
1

The point is they don’t because they are generally too lazy and lack the physical prowess to do so. When it comes to hard work and grit it’s men who dominate in spades. Women thrive only when men make society comfortable enough for them to do so.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 10:28 AM
3

Let's prove my position right now. Please link us to a single feminist post where you have attacked a feminist in the same way you have attacked me. Go on, we'll be waiting.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 09:40 AM
1

Of an abusive woman. No doubt we’ll hear from you again when you need your plumbing fixed or your garbage collected or your electricity generated. Or just when you need to extort more state money from taxes overwhelmingly paid into by men.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 09:11 AM
1

You are literal proof.
/r/MensRights21/04/21 06:38 AM
21

And the shaming continues. You say you “understood” my claims? And never disputed them? This suggests you accept what I said as fact. So why is there no acknowledgement of this? Why was your immediate response to set up straw man and attack that? You got rather defensive. Interesting. You see us red pilled guys see this kind of thing all the time. You say you are for men’s rights. Yet what you really mean is you are for men’s rights only as long as your female privileges are not threatened or ex…
/r/MensRights21/04/21 12:05 AM
25

Notice everyone how she attempts to flip the blame back onto me. Not once did she even attempt to respond to the example and facts I stated. Instead she set up a straw man argument and attacked that instead. She claims to be “for men’s rights” yet doesn’t seem to understand the basis of what we are fighting for. Her response is a classic example of covert female shaming of men who try and talk about the issues men face. These same women will then turn around and blame men for not opening up afte…
/r/MensRights20/04/21 11:47 PM
14

I don’t care. This is a British case and I’m British.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 11:08 PM
11

I’m from the UK, and it’s been known for a few years now that there are more female lawyers. Female lawyers outnumber males
/r/MensRights20/04/21 10:55 PM
8

Correct. The old gynocentric spectrum of traditionalism vs feminism. Both models benefitting women at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 10:27 PM
6

Correct. This happens a lot in India.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 09:13 PM
54

There are plenty. I'll stick to one example that is relevant to this case. Notice how when the police caught her in the act of lying (a very serious criminal offense) all she needed to do was make a false rape allegation to get them once again off her back and back onto the man. This kind of unlawful reasoning is due to the feminist narrative being pushed into the criminal justice system for purely political means. What they should have done is questioned her credibility (seeing as she had alrea…
/r/MensRights20/04/21 09:09 PM
1

The definition of “gendered” means something specific to one gender. For example, ovarian and prostate cancer are gendered. Violence is not. Advocating for an equal system is not the same as the examples you have try to use. Nice false equivocation there.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 08:04 PM
45

Oh please, most lawyers are now women pushing the “progressive” and feminist agenda.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 07:15 PM
1

No I didn’t. You decided to define “gendered” in your own subjective way. I can’t refute your opinions so it wasn’t worth me directly addressing. I therefore moved onto the solution we are advocating for here. It is you who misses the point of what we really stand for.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 06:59 PM
69

Not surprised. The legal system has been dominated by feminists for years now. No doubt she thought she’d get away with it.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 06:55 PM
1

There are literally hundreds of studies that come to the same conclusion as this one. It’s not a secret that women are more abusive than men.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 04:25 PM
1

Tbf it supports what most of us already know.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 01:11 PM
4

Then they encourage the woman to exaggerate and make the situation sound far worse than it actually was so they can charge him with the worse possible offense(s) they can get away with.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 05:03 PM
4

Correct. Feminism has and always will be an extremist hate group.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:48 PM
3

The actually study has been cited in the comments. Nice try troll.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 02:45 PM
1

I recommend you go away and calm down. You are being far too emotional and it’s clouding your judgement. Return after you’ve read this study and the hundreds of others that corroborate it.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:59 PM
1

You’ve just admitted that your position is based on your personal feelings and therefore bias. I can’t really refute your feelings so there’s no point in this discussion. I’d rather remain objective and rational and none of your arguments refute the overall conclusion of the study despite your original comment being a clear attempt to invalidate the results. Your bias is clear. You made no attempt to actually read the study properly (you admitted this) you just came in to push your “feelings” on…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 11:57 AM
1

I'm telling you now that this is my feeling on the matter. That is the proof. And this is the problem right here. You need to do less feeling and more thinking. I rest my case. Go back and read the study.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 11:25 AM
4

Ok, so when you claimed that you critique all studies and methodologies in this way you were actually lying... Until you provide any sort of proof that you are consistent like you have claimed then there is no point in furthering this discussion. You simply can not back up anything you are saying. Provide one piece of proof that you have critiqued ANY OTHER domestic violence related study and we can move forward. In the mean time, actually read the study beforehand before trying to "debunk" it. …
/r/MensRights17/04/21 10:42 AM
3

Which makes it appear as though the data was gathered, and applies to all age ranges, yes. The study was open to all age ranges yes. They made that clear in the study and they haven't misrepresented anything. You just haven't even bothered to read the abstract of the study. The are fully transparent about all of this. So this is a moot point. No, it was done between male and female students. Not just men and women. Just because it's technically correct that the study was about men vs women, that…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 10:35 AM
4

Glad to hear they're moving onto dealing with more age ranges, but then why are they portraying their results as though it applies to everyone, and not just the most recent generation of adults. They haven't done this at all. They've differentiated between men and women. Why? Because they were doing a study between men and women. Furthermore, the study was open to people up to the age of 71. It just so happened that it was mostly younger people who participated. The average age of the men was 26…
/r/MensRights17/04/21 10:09 AM
8

Feminism has always been a fraudulent movement. It’s always been about money and power and the domestic violence issue is their multi-billion dollar cash cow. Of course they have to lie about it. If they tell the truth the money dries up and the feminist movement dies. No more living in Hollywood mansions for them.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 09:14 AM
10

Most domestic violence reports happen in younger people and tend to taper out as people age. This is the general pattern that is seen. The same researchers are moving on to conduct studies with older people next. They actually borrowed most of the methods used in this study from previous studies that feminists love to flaunt. So if you want to throw out the methodology you have to pretty much throw out all the research done on DV up until this point. Questionnaires are actually quite normal for …
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:42 AM
4

Yes, it’s laughable how obvious the double standards are and everybody just walking semi-comatose through life just thinks it’s ok.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:32 AM
1

The solution is simple. Treat everyone like humans. Everyone here knows gynocentrism has gone too far. So we raise awareness of that fact.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:28 AM
3

Yes I think Harvard University did a study on this. They found in most cases when men got violent with women it was in response to female initiated violence
/r/MensRights17/04/21 08:21 AM
2

Went through the BPD ex thing. I’ve experienced it with the false allegations, smear campaigns and everything
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:44 AM
13

It’s old news that needs to be repeated unfortunately for newer listeners.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:40 AM
4

I’d argue that’s it’s the emotional abuse that is on the whole much worse than the physical a lot of the time. Abusive women can get away with covertly abusing for years.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:39 AM
1

Which proves it’s not wrong. So I’m still right.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 12:36 AM
0

All of these offences are already covered thoroughly by section(s) 1-4 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This has to be the most uninformed and idiotic petition I have ever seen.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:50 PM
6

A 1,000+ sample size is large enough. I repeat, the study is in the comments. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:31 PM
6

Study is in the comments.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 11:16 PM
5

You are aware that your critique of the daily mail doesn’t change the outcome of the study right? The study still found that women were more physically and verbally abusive than men.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 10:53 PM
2

How did they even know? You aren’t the first person to be kicked from a group for posting here. Are you guys all being closely monitored? Lol
/r/MensRights16/04/21 10:47 PM
3

Yes I agree with you. I wouldn’t read too much into that statement. I think the researcher was merely speculating. They admitted to being surprised at the results as it was an all female research team. Were you in the Cumbria study or another one?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 09:31 PM
9

People are already being kicked out of other subreddits for even commenting on this post.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 09:23 PM
7

A commenter already linked the study. There have been hundreds of studies done over the last 40 years coming to the same or similar conclusions.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 09:20 PM
13

Because even if that were the case there would still be a significant number of female victims. It wouldn’t be a gendered issue but a human issue.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 09:06 PM
4

You will start to see who the real tyrants are. You are welcome to participate here anytime
/r/MensRights16/04/21 09:03 PM
2

What did they say?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:52 PM
4

You got banned by another group for commenting in this group?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:52 PM
7

This study was reported in multiple media outlets. Choose whichever you are most comfortable with and enjoy the study.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:35 PM
9

It’s not the journalism we care about. It’s the results of the study.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:12 PM
4

A lot of women like it. Get used to it.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:04 PM
25

We don’t need to say that. We are more concerned with debunking the feminist myth that DV is a “gendered crime”
/r/MensRights16/04/21 08:01 PM
4

Ah I get it the SJWs and feminists are here
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:56 PM
11

The all female research team used the terms aggression, violence and abuse. The original study has been cited by a poster in the comment section. You are free to check it out. Your comment and intentions are dishonest.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:53 PM
22

Watch the video and learn. You can look into as many of the studies he references as you like
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:27 PM
34

All violence is underreported. But men are far more likely to underreport than women.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:22 PM
32

Steve Moxon does a great break down and cites the specific study somewhere in the middle. Check it out. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sTZvvxV4enI&t=1645s
/r/MensRights16/04/21 07:20 PM
7

What are you talking about? Be more specific?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:48 PM
29

There have been studies debunking the idea that men for the most part inflict more damage than women in DV situations. Abusive men are still more likely to “hold back” than women. Women are also more likely to use weapons, throw things, cut, stab etc. Most female victims of DV present mostly with superficial injuries or no injuries at all.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:47 PM
6

People need to go speak to elderly women. They’ll tell you how much they miss being wolf whistled in the good old days.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:21 PM
3

Damn dude you got some unfortunate downvotes there. Sorry bro.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:58 PM
16

What do they define as sexual harassment though?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:33 PM
5

I don't disagree with you. Unfortunately the "woke" minority control the agenda of our politicians, the mainstream media, law enforcement, the criminal justice system etc. These institutions have long been taken over by radical feminist rhetoric.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:26 PM
15

Guilty until proven innocent. The lonely plight of the accused man.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:22 PM
10

The study was conducted by female researchers. They admitted themselves that they were very surprised at the results. They said that it goes against the mainstream notion that DV is caused by the inherent patriarchal conditioning of men. They are in the process of conducting further research as a result of their findings. Let’s see what happens.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 05:06 PM
5

Read the study.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:49 PM
16

The ONS data is not a study. The numbers are taken from the annual Crime Survey and for the most part there is no way to actually verify the numbers. They have also acknowledged that men greatly under report in previous years.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:22 PM
22

Domestic violence is a “gendered crime” or the “overwhelming majority of victims are women and perpetrators are men”. Anything along those lines.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:41 PM
49

Brilliant! Thanks!
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:23 PM
5

According to mainstream society the answer is yes. It is always claimed that “woman may not know they are being abused” when the genders are flipped. So for equality’s sake the answer to your response should be yes too. (Not my opinion)
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:22 PM
37

It takes a while to detox from a lifetime of propaganda. Stick with us. We’ll help you through it.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 03:01 PM
26

Ok so this simply proves that you personally are not violent. There have literally been hundreds of studies conducted over the past 40 years from all over the world that support the conclusion of this article. Trouble is, these studies are seen as problematic as they refute and go against the mainstream narrative that domestic violence is a “gendered crime” and so rarely receive much media attention. Women and men have always been battering each other since the dawn of time.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 02:51 PM
15

Clarify what you mean by “the 97% study of women and sexual assault” ? Is your claim that 97% of studies indicate that women are disproportionately affected? You’re going to need to quantify your claim properly
/r/MensRights16/04/21 02:45 PM
2

Yes. The only time prosecutors will take action is when you have a ridiculous situation like this one. Had she only falsely accused one man, they wouldn't have done shit 99% of the time.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 12:04 PM
4

Ear For Men is great.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 05:07 PM
2

Correct.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 02:17 AM
12

Because our society is gynocentric and men are not allowed to be the primary victims of anything. The only way to get most of society on board and to take an issue like this seriously is to make women the primary victims. This is why they must mention how this harms the “real” female victims of rape rather than the men who’s lives have been destroyed. It’s a narrative that sells much better. Plus it’s largely the only way the majority of women will get on board.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 02:13 AM
1

Go get raped and falsely accused of rape. Come back after and tell me which affected your life more in an adverse way.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 12:21 AM
7

Incorrect. She hasn’t filed any report that’s the problem. Actually refute the points I’ve made rather than attacking straw man next time.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 11:23 PM
8

There is zero evidence to support this assertion. It’s simply a politically motivated claim with absolutely no data to back it up. If a genuine victim wants justice they should go through the proper criminal justice route and follow due process. She will be believed and supported by law enforcement and their respective victims support agencies. Taking to social media so she can increase her onlyfans subscriber list is defamation plain and simple. If she chooses the route of going to the court of…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 11:05 PM
6

That’s why I’ve told them to check the facts. If you check the facts it becomes clear she’s not being sincere about much of what she’s saying. I think it is far more dangerous for genuine victims to allow unfounded allegations like these to go unchecked.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 10:23 PM
9

There is no way to prove this either way. She has no proof he did anything wrong and the proof she does have suggests zero wrongdoing and that she wanted to be there with him. She has every classic sign of a false accuser. I understand why you objectively would want to sit on the fence but unfortunately all it takes is an allegation like this to ruin a mans life. Personally I think she should be called out on her questionable behaviour. If we as a society started doing this more than we would ac…
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:25 PM
10

Exactly. Genuine sexual assault/rape victims do not behave this way.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:19 PM
6

Actually look into the facts of the situation. She has every classic sign of a false accuser.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 05:17 PM
3

When you stop caring about the outcome things will start falling in to place trust me. Almost everything that works is counterintuitive when you are dating women.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 02:28 PM
6

Hahahahaha wow... this just reached a whole new level of crazy
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:17 PM
10

Just speak honestly without any bias. The issues that men are facing are not difficult to understand or spot. The issue here is that there is a huge political agenda backed by billions of dollars to keep the gynocentric status quo in place. The best way is to just keep speaking honestly about these topics. Start with everyone you know and start getting the truth out.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 03:16 PM
2

Talk to any experienced secondary school teacher and they will tell you that it's the behaviour of teenage girls that are more problematic and troublesome than the boys.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 03:12 PM
3

Absolutely. Even if you reported her you run the risk of her lying and making a false counter allegation.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 07:53 AM
1

Yes most relationships I see have women coercively controlling their male partners. Yet in the UK, coercive control is now being used as the newest political weapon against men. Anything you do can be interpreted by the police or prosecutors as coercive control. The situation is a mess here. It’s such a dangerous slippery slope.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 11:43 PM
2

False allegations are way worse. Rape victims get support and help. The falsely accused get nothing.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 11:35 PM
5

Lol waste of time. Nobody is going to take that seriously.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 11:20 PM
33

I’m going through this this right now. Wish me luck...
/r/MensRights08/04/21 01:03 AM
0

So what are you proposing instead? What is a woman’s sexual strategy? I’m genuinely curious because to me hypergamy is so obvious, observable and repeatable. Every girl I’ve dated admit it to me. It’s not an issue if you’re considered high value. You’d be surprised at the amount of stuff women will reveal to you if they feel they won’t be judged.
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:59 AM
2

Yes go study lions (or literally anything)...
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:55 AM
0

There’s plenty lol look at females in almost any species and you will observe the same hypergamous nature. Watch mating rituals in animal documentaries and study how the female pre-selects for the highest value male she can get.
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:54 AM
1

Hypergamy isn’t a bad thing anyway. It’s normal for women. They just want the best genes. It’s in their nature. It’s not inherently evil (most of the time).
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:51 AM
1

I agree. I’m against enforcing roles on people.
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:47 AM
-2

Then you haven’t been around women pal. So I recommend you get out there and just watch and observe
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:47 AM
2

What sort of evidence are you after? I just gave you a way you can and have directly observed hypergamy yourself. Most likely many times.
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:45 AM
0

Well sure. Look at a woman’s dating strategy versus men’s in general. Women will always try and date up. Men on the other hand will date at their level or down. That’s the easiest and most observable example of hypergamy. It’s common sense and based on basic biology tbh
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:42 AM
-4

You think female hypergamy is made up? Lol are you a man or a woman?
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:32 AM
-11

Well it is. After red pill I became more confident, a lot more successful with women, had a mission and purpose in life. I’m no longer controlled by groupthink or government backed propaganda etc. Sure I went through a slightly ragey phase for a couple of years but you come out a new man. What about it do you disagree with?
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:30 AM
-12

Hmm, I disagree about it being nonsense. Red pill is simply the observation of reality nothing more. If you choose to project more onto it then you’re gonna start running into problems.
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:26 AM
1

Dunno, I’m red pilled and honestly it changed my life for the better. I’m not really sure you can ever truly be ex red pilled. It’s kinda like meeting God then claiming later you no longer believe in God.
/r/ExRedPill02/04/21 01:20 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter