TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

independance_soft Archive

View 2 posts and 37 comments by independance_soft on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
22

Activism/Supportindependance_soft/r/MensRights09/07/24 05:58 PM
17

Edu./Occu.independance_soft/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:06 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I didn't say that, and, You're the one with all the downvotes, as you argue against objective facts on the definition of stoicism. Stoicism makes no claim on specific virtues, only the idea that nature will change to one's own virtue, and that one's own virtue is the only way to live.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 09:52 PM
2

Must be tears of happiness
/r/MensRights09/07/24 09:35 PM
1

For the first part, no, just look at the statistics. Young women/ girls are not carrying guns and shooting people because they belong to a different gang or said something rude at recess. You’re living in la-la land if you don’t understand that outside of family groups almost all violence comes from young men. Criminal behavior goes beyond toxicity. We can all find videos of women fighting each other. We reach mental illness at the point you are speaking of, and I agree with Beccaria on what sho…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 05:42 PM
3

In -Beyond Good and Evil- You desire to LIVE “according to Nature”? Oh, you noble Stoics, what fraud of words! Imagine to yourselves a being like Nature, boundlessly extravagant, boundlessly indifferent, without purpose or consideration, without pity or justice, at once fruitful and barren and uncertain: imagine to yourselves INDIFFERENCE as a power — how COULD you live in accordance with such indifference? To live — is not that just endeavouring to be otherwise than this Nature? Is not living v…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 12:16 AM
4

Do you not think that that's just toxicity? I've certainly seen plenty of feminine people do those things. Also, that is not what stoicism is, only what you personally think is virtuous, the MGTOWs are just as stoic, with all the slave mentality it comes with, so are the pill people, and neither really believes in chivalry. Aurelius was an absolute monarch who complained about his lot in life, while having all the power to change it. Epictetus was an educated slave who only ever waited for the a…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 09:27 PM
1

Why didn't you call the bluff? Or let her do it?
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:45 AM
0

I am not arguing with you, I gave you legitimate advice. Even with all great sources and citations, without credentials your objections and ideas in medicine will be thrown out without a single thought. Even reddit/subreddits are very critical of things that can be perceived as medical advice, even if one's credentials are shown.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 02:38 AM
0

https://bulgaria.iom.int/ukraine-response Since the start of the conflict, almost 10 million people have already crossed into adjacent countries. As of 18 July 2022, 870,421 refugees from Ukraine are estimated to be third country nationals (TCNs). On the ground there is a lack of resources for ensuring transportation, accommodation and assistance for refugees and TCNs. What you have told me is that this situation, at best, hasn't changed. And your own government stated that they don't have the r…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 01:20 AM
0

Are you under the assumption that there's no Ukrainian on the waiting list for your country? They don't want more, as much as you do.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 01:07 AM
0

And of 40 million, your country only took 150,000. Even of the 6.5 million current refugees, your country only has 150,000, according to you.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 12:51 AM
-4

Welcome to reddit. I stated an objective fact, and made no assumptions, but I find the vocabulary questionable, maybe even unprofessional.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:34 PM
-4

I would suggest avoiding medical vocabulary if you are not a medical professional at the doctoral level.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:14 PM
-1

This doesn't relate to men's rights, and I'd suggest reevaluating your pill people's view on dating. It is highly individual, and generalization is self-sabotage. I'll tell you what I tell women, Fool you once, shame on them Fool you twice, shame on them Fool you thrice, okay, there's a pattern Four times? Yes, congratulations, you have a type.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 11:05 PM
1

but in the end, the centrality of their philosophical approaches are quite useful for men in these times in which he lives cloistered within himself and where changes are neither easy nor always satisfactory. It's useful for anyone who only wants to live life, but they only provide a hurdle to any movement, especially since they actively spread their bullshit to people who could participate in politics and social change. It is the minded of the lazy and tyrannical. Regarding pills, I consider it…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 10:18 PM
1

You say that, yet much of your population, and your government differs.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 10:03 PM
3

It's often compared to Buddhism.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:21 PM
0

I'm not against stoicism overrall, it has values, like most philosophical schools. I, in fact, lived with the ethics in my later HS years. But they are counterproductive to a political movement, if they want to help in such a movement, then it would be best to go back to the Greek stoics, as opposed to the roman stoics, and stay out of the way. You write as if the pill people's idea of facts makes them less stoic, but it's exactly what makes them stoic, see Nietzsche's criticisms. As for your ot…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:10 PM
4

Feminists, not women, and it's because of the introduction of intersectionality, which also allowed the protection of radical feminists, and let them take over for several decades. We shouldn't want that.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:43 PM
-2

.1. Throw the MGTOWS and other pill people under the proverbial bus, they do more harm than good, I have been going on a bit of a tirade against their perverse versions of stoicism this weekend. .2. Introduce ethics beyond stoicism, stoicism only leads to complacency in these political movements that strive for change. .3. Too much doomsaying. Which may be related to the issues above. Edit: You can downvote me all you want, but Aurelius was an absolute monarch who complained about his lot in lif…
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:37 PM
-7

There are strong implications of support for TRP in your discussion on MGTOW. Before that discussion you only complained about women, and followed the TRP paragraph by saying this all reminds you of your personal example.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 03:57 AM
-11

Are perfect breeding grounds for groups like MGTOW or more male equivalents to the 4B movement to exist. And we can't compare these groups to the red pill movement or anything masculinity movement. Albeit MGTOW is definitely not something ideal for men. But at least the red pill still adheres to the status quo of a double bind society (IRONICALLY). While the concept of MGTOW goes against that. And that will cause issues. TF I can't compare them, they are all pill people, and use the same pervert…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/07/24 03:48 AM
1

That depends on what you want to say.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 12:46 AM
2

I can't say anything, I also make judicious use of commas.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:29 PM
1

Disagreed 8 years ago, still disagree. MGTOW pseudoscience, and that shit on monkeys has long been proven false. Conditions, not biology, effect both cultures and society. I made a comment on MGTOW and stoicism earlier, and this video is evidence of their relationship, you're only slaves to your own lot in life, and I feel I've made a breakthrough to one of many reasons why I despise MGTOW. With all your love for truth, you have forced yourselves so long, so persistently, and with such hypnotic …
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:11 PM
0

Stoicism is hardly about controlling emotions, it's about living your lot in life, with minimal pain or pleasure (hence the common idea that they reject emotions). The majority of people here are not stoics, as much as they might say so, the MGTOWS are, oddly enough, the closest ones. The skeptic cannot be a stoic, they question things too much. Stoicism states that virtue is all you need to get by in life, and that's why the modern realists aren't usually stoics. Feminists, as well as women ove…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 01:10 PM
1

There are rules to this, but idk what they are, and this sounds against them.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:15 PM
1

Idk how you can say they're useless degrees, when they clearly allow for influence.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 09:52 AM
2

I just want to point out that she made that documentary before TRP became the cesspool it became.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 09:50 AM
-11

Oh, ffs, I said as independence_soft(numbers I can't remember) and mentioned it last week as frosty touch, last 2 accounts. The world doesn't like refugees, there are still women in the Ukraine, stop spreading dumbass rumors. There are only 6 million Ukrainian expats, and that includes the refugees, you're going to sit there and tell me that the Ukraine's population consisted of less than 6 million women and over 32 million men? The Ukraine needs to fight, and should conscript women, hell, the k…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 09:25 AM
1

The stereotype is certainly common, I've been guilty of it myself, most men will be DTF without even knowing the other person's name.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 03:21 AM
2

Mary I Elizabeth I Isabella I Castille Elizabeth Becker Jenny-Wanda Barkman Greta Bösel Marie-Françoise Bougaran Jennifer and Sarah Hart Masumi Hayashi Jennifer San Marco -these are just some big names too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/24 03:14 AM
17

The victim's mother expressed outrage.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:58 AM
1

Were that true, there would be a lot of irony there.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:34 AM
1

It was probably the word, "disability," that flagged it, but idk what the bot looks for.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:08 AM
2

Because the voters who interact with them are women. Women participate in politics more frequently than men, including local elections, and contacting politicians.
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:42 PM
3

I cannot find the interviews, are these articles running under an assumption based on the interviews these women had?
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:34 PM
1

To properly argue against the idea of the patriarchy as the feminists know it, you must know what it entails. To them it is a society where men are the first to everything, and most feminists agree that men are the first to everything good and bad, even if some believe it's only the good. You may think of it like a pair of rings. The outer ring is all adult men, and the inner ring everyone else. All the world's boons and curses hit men first, while women are protected in the center ring. Hence t…
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:06 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter