TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

independance_soft1 Archive

View 0 posts and 132 comments by independance_soft1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I get that you mentioned population in worldwide, but when it comes to loneliness it doesn't matter at all You don't get it. The "population" mentioned explicitly referred to the data already mentioned in the same sentence. Have you finished basic education?
/r/MensRights23/07/24 05:17 AM
1

You have yet to provide the sources on your claims about Nietzscheism, which is exactly what I requested in the last comment. Nor have you given an example of these hundreds of millions of deaths, corruption and starvation that stems from every attempt at it. Additionally, a couple mentions of Nietzsche doesn't mean I completely follow Nietzsche, everything I've stated about you has been as a result of your own writing.
/r/MensRights23/07/24 02:16 AM
1

You failed English, lit, and history classes didn't you? How can you think that you have a true grasp of something without barely third hand sources?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:53 PM
1

You're doing exactly what you've accused me of, you're assuming a philosopher has a philosophy they never had, and how did you come to the conclusion that Nietzsche is a collectivist, or that any society or large group had used Nietzschean ideals?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:40 PM
0

Have you ever actually read Nietzsche?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:22 PM
-1

Marx and Nietzsche were totally different, Nietzsche is nearly as individualistic as Ayn Rand, maybe even more so. I get that you do, but that goes back to my first comment about letting society collapse under perpetually victimized self-hating male supremacists like you. You are making alot of contradictory statements, how can one be a collectivist, male supremacist, and a self hating male, and support freedom in its highest form of individualism. Nietzsche are great sources for the betterment …
/r/MensRights22/07/24 10:54 PM
2

Don't worry, we'll all get downvotes later, the pill people and mgtows come out in droves at night.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 10:21 PM
39

Just because Selena Gomez and Hailey Bieber got beef, doesn't mean there is a conspiracy of pressure, occam's razor would say that they just got the beef.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 10:18 PM
-1

Stoicism has little relevance to a movement requiring advocacy. The fact that you would encourage people to do nothing is proof. As Nietzsche said, stoics are self tyrants, slaves to their own minds, and act like there is simply nothing they can do. I haven't dragged anyone down. That's the point.. Of Stoics that mgtows and pill people tend to follow one was an all powerful dictator who whined about his life while having the power to change it and choosing not to, and the other an educated serva…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:31 PM
1

You think?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:01 PM
1

Stoic bullshit. Stop dragging other men down, you are no strong man to suggest you have no power in good times aside from, "doing nothing."
/r/MensRights22/07/24 08:59 PM
3

You can't win if you're not playing. At best, you're a non factor, not even on the board. If you're going to live by the stoicism of the pill people and mgtows, the least you can do is stay out of the way so others can actually change things for you, and stop trying to drag them down. You're not being apathetic, you are actively undermining.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 07:39 PM
13

Take your complaints to your politicians, avoid the common talks about women seen here, they are detrimental on a political level. Focus on men and men alone, don't even say anything about women.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:03 PM
0

You are either an idiot at this point, or being intentionally obtuse.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 03:08 PM
2

Gabbard was a great candidate.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 03:07 PM
-1

Population, in this case, is a word describing the object of interest in a statistic. It is not referring to the amount of people in a nation.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 12:51 PM
-3

That men are currently lonelier, and that population is increasing. Stating that the lonliness epidemic has spread to women is not a denial of those statistics. The mra's of reddit are simply too quick to take offense at the slightest disagreement of manosphere bs, it is full of pill people and mgtows and they are the radical feminists of our movement.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 11:59 AM
1

“If your partner is too altruistic, they don’t value you” that’s plain dumb, altruism is literally what a healthy relationship is… Oh you sweet, summer child. An altruistic love is a love that says, "I love you just for your own sake, I have no personal interest in it, but I am so unselfish that I am marrying you only for your own good." Now if you're into that, more power to you, but this altruistic love is something that has been in education since education existed, even before chivalry. We h…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 10:43 AM
1

I didn't ask you a question, idk or care what you're saying, "yes," to. that it’s in my benefit to give attention to women who don’t think selfishly like modern feminism Sure you don't want a narcissist, but if a partner is too altruistic, then they don't value you, it will not be an equal relationship. I’m actually providing more clues to you here on solutions, you don’t want to listen or play devils advocate you simply say “no” “no” how can it be! Making things fair in dating? Must be blasphem…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 10:17 AM
0

Where did I say this? Solutions here would be to normalise sex and dating into stable ratios, I believe addressing men’s opportunity issues, are paramount to addressing many of the issues Because without equal supply and demand, you have an economic ticking time bomb, this time, it blows up gendered relations If the issue was flipped genders, I’d be advocating for women. Because what’s unfair, is simply, unfair You said nothing but lip service. Admitting to being a passport bro is the only solut…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 10:03 AM
-1

You literally said that you don't want solutions. That is a telltale sign of these groups.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:47 AM
0

You have not provided any solutions. You have only provided the same excuses the mgtows use to remain single, and the pill people use to manipulate people, and the arguments I made were correct, that is a major problem, everyone wants this to be a group-think problem with an all-in-one fix. But this is a highly individualistic subject. The only solution you have shown is that of the passport bros, "all the women of my culture are of no value, so I look to foreigners." I don't see anything wrong …
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:46 AM
0

What precisely am I advocating for that would increase the population of the lonely?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:34 AM
-4

Okay, the purpose of this post is to grab the arrow pointing away from solutions, away from reality, and reel it back in. So you are one of those corrupt stoics, the mgtows. You want people to be miserable with you?
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:30 AM
-2

How is this a false premise given that women are approached often? Is this misuse of opportunity, or actual loneliness? Please see this issue plainly when you look at bars/clubs/dating apps (the places people can meet) it’s a sausage fest Your false premise was assuming that lonliness is explicitly a male issue, it is mostly a male issue, but not explicitly. These are distinct statements, you haven’t answered this point, if a women’s inbox is 10x/100x/1000x mens on average, (this is proven, if n…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:27 AM
-7

Current disparities don't change future estimates. I did not deny statistics.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 09:10 AM
-12

Always place 2 periods around the numbers in your numbered list. Questions never explain anything. Why, is one side generally at a massive disadvantage? And getting lonelier by the day in these circumstances? This is a false premise, the lonliness epidemic hit women a while ago, Dr Ruth Westheimer was named NY state's ambassador for lonliness in 2023. Why, is one side pursuing more than the other? This grants disproportionate power to the pursued, in ways that grow more than self adjust You have…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 08:37 AM
1

That is not a refutation.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:54 AM
2

That's your opinion, but Rand and O'Connor had a real love, and they were together until death.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:51 AM
-1

This is why everyone hates the Stoics. "I am always right, everyone must come down to my level, no one has control over anything." Dismiss me all you want, with your slave mentality.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:50 AM
-2

I challenge you find APA approved, and peer reviewed human experiments and research on it.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:48 AM
0

None of this is modern or post modern. It has a unique set of, "rules," If it has any at all.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:46 AM
1

That information is mired in rumors and conspiracy. Some people say it was a polyamorous relationship between the two couples involved. But it's important to note that the, "affair," only came out after Rand's death, and from people who had known grievances against her.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:45 AM
-1

There is no scientific evidence to suggest that such a hypothesis from, "the sage," exists.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:38 AM
-4

Did you really just send me a psuedo-scientific article from a biased website, saying that pheromones can control a person's view? Are you really going to use that to back up your excuses? If you want to be alone, that's fine, but few people agree. And Robert Wright is a hack anti-theist who takes all the soul out of Buddhism for his new age bullshit. He is not someone to listen to about the nature of anything.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:31 AM
-2

Ahh, but there's the difference in the corrupted pill people's idea and Ayn Rand's view. She wouldn't screw him over, she would take a bullet for him, and him her, because it’s beneficial that they live. https://youtube.com/watch?v=mQVrMzWtqgU&si=a5CEQIWPoQI9gn9d
/r/MensRights22/07/24 06:28 AM
0

it's been this way probably since before i was born and no flowery feel good language will change that. the pill people and manosphere dudes are some of the only people that i know that are offering people better advice. You might like Ayn Rand Once you realize a selfish love is one where it benefits you to that your partner should succeed. That realization might change views, both parties should lift each other up in their own goals, because it benefits them. You would never find anyone like th…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 05:56 AM
-10

Love isn't chemical, it is logical, it is selfish, that's what Ayn Rand might say. The others would say something like, "no risk, no reward." It is what it is, you don't want it, that's fine, but don't sit there and try to make everyone else lonely with your excuses. because you see I am in love with him selfishly. It is to my own interest to help him if he ever needed it. I would not call that a sacrifice, because I take selfish pleasure in it. I say that man is entitled to his own happiness. A…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 05:55 AM
3

At least it's not YA, my teachers through middle school and high school made us read one a year. I told my senior year English teacher, "I will go insane if I have to read about one more depressed teenager."
/r/MensRights22/07/24 05:14 AM
0

Try -Anthem- by Ayn Rand
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:52 AM
1

"Fuck kamala Harris, and vote for trump." Sort of. She is currently at a forum in Rome on peace and security. Says kamala is unfit and unqualified. That she finds it incredibly dangerous for Harris to be making decisions, and calls her a warmonger. Then endorses trump. It is on her youtube channel.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:36 AM
1

Speaking of Tulsi Gabbard https://youtube.com/watch?v=rwEY3lh51hI&si=bDhLKWG6mBens9tw
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:08 AM
1

Speaking of Tulsi Gabbard https://youtube.com/watch?v=rwEY3lh51hI&si=bDhLKWG6mBens9tw
/r/MensRights22/07/24 04:07 AM
-15

It just saddens me that no other philosophy aside from the corrupted stoicism of these groups has reached people. No objectivism, no transcendentalism of any kind, no realism, no scholastics or other religious philosophy. Just stoic nihilism. As for advice, have you ever listened or read actual experts in relationships and dating? Dr Ruth Westheimer Dr John Gottman Dr Sue Johnson Sue Johanson Etc. Hell, even Ayn Rand had better advice and views on love and romance than the pill people.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 03:52 AM
8

It would be pretty unethical for anyone to give such advice over reddit, contact a lawyer who is in, or neighboring your area.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/24 03:21 AM
3

In the 15th session of her preliminary trial, which was essentially the investigation. The interrogations focused on the idea of witchcraft, and here is the charge of it in the ordinary trial. https://www.famous-trials.com/the-trial-of-joan-of-arc-1431/2364-trial-transcript-reading-of-70-articles-of-accusations-and-joan-s-answers-to-each she made herself a diviner; she caused herself to be adored and venerated; she had invoked demons, and evil spirits; consulted them, associated with them, had m…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:02 AM
5

That would mean a draft.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:01 PM
11

The most famous witch trial victim is Joan of Arc, idk what you're on about.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:45 PM
101

It's Harris, Clinton already endorsed her. Aside from her history as a prosecutor, I am not actually familiar with Harris' history regarding men's rights and issues.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:38 PM
3

I considered tulsi gabbard an acceptable candidate even then when she was pro-gun-control. Shame they picked Biden.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:23 PM
1

Goddammit, that SOB dropped out today. Endorsed Harris. Clinton is also out, endorsed Harris.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:11 PM
3

To scrap the system you need to join the Libertarian party. I'm not saying that to promote them, though I have voted that way before. The 2 main parties aren't going to do it, and for any other to compete they actually need members and politicians, it's a written requirement for the debates, that a party must have a viable chance to win the electoral vote. That means, in a given election, the third party needs enough politicians running for the house seats to be competitive, and that their presi…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:08 PM
8

You don't ask her to split the bill, you tell the waiter, "separate checks."
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:35 PM
15

And yet, they ban all MRAs, and heavily criticise the MRM.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/24 08:27 PM
1

There is no such thing as appeasement, humans are inherently selfish, the man saw a tangible benefit, even if you don't see it. If I buy milk, you don't have the right to declare my purchase worthless without protest.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:24 PM
44

Idk what you're expecting from men's lib, they blame men for everything, they are not in favor of men. They are feminists who focus on, "toxic masculinity."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/24 08:17 PM
9

You can Google these court cases you know, they are public knowledge.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 01:02 PM
8

TLDR only skimmed I have had the opposite experience, masculinity is just as social in the LGBT community as femininity. The biggest controversy is the promiscuity. Yes, as a bisexual, I'd totally tap Dave Rubin, masculinity has a special kind of attractiveness. Chlamydia has treatments, it is curable. It's not the worst you could have gotten, always get tested about 6 months after any risqué encounter, and wear condoms that protect from STDs.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:34 AM
0

You can't abort a baby after they're out dude, and no man has ever paid child support on a fetus. Enough with the ad Hominem, you haven't provided any evidence to your claims.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:21 AM
3

I should not have to explain common knowledge. More abortions would be favorable to the anti-child support people. you know this is not true, women are never forced to pay child support, only men are cause women get to abort in the first place men don't have that option. also, you sound like a woman and obviously created an account like last week. I literally gave you a case in which a woman is paying child support, there are also cases where an ex-wife was made to pay alimony. This specific acc…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:19 AM
4

Abortion has little to do with child support, and there are plenty of circumstances that make women pay child support. Roma Army, for example, reports that she is the parent paying child support due to her finances and split custody. The battle you want is unwinnable, and worthless to the MRM, women are not the enemy, the goal is to obtain and ensure fair and equal rights and treatment of men.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:00 AM
5

These issues don't intersect, and this post has no real relationship to men's rights or issues. I say this as a pro lifer, this is not something that is related to men's rights or issues and taking this stance would be detrimental to the movement.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:50 AM
5

How does this relate to men's issues or rights?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:42 AM
0

There's only 2 real options, I don't even think Gary Oliver is on the ballot in every state, Kennedy certainly isn't.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:09 AM
6

I voted for Jorgenson in 2020,.join the Libertarian party, they need higher membership numbers to compete with the democrats and republicans, you can still vote whomever you want, but to end a 2-party system a third needs guaranteed constituents and representatives.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:52 AM
13

Biden is not going to give up that spot, idk why this is even a question. Also, it isn't really related to men's rights, and I think this is an international community. Edit: SOAB, I apologize to everyone here, I hate it when I'm wrong, as of July 21, 2024, Joe Biden has endorsed Kamala Harris for president. This will be another wild ride of an election, if you're American please join the Libertarian party, you can vote for whoever you want, but to compete with the main parties a third needs act…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 06:51 AM
-4

If an independent man sees value in the behavior, who are you to criticise him? Especially when he's not here to defend himself, we don't know these people. Your attitude is why stoicism doesn't belong in advocacy, you sit there with your pill people and mgtow ideology, act like you know everything, like you have no power, and then demean other men to get on your level. All while real MRAs do all the hard work, that you believe can't be done.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:12 AM
0

I believe that rhetoric supports collective behavior, and it is objectively evil.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:06 AM
7

Get off reddit, you are too impressionable at your age. Listen in school, talk to your peers, watch multiple points of view, it is almost certain your ideas will change, gain experiences. Sure, there are people here who believe that women are all bad, but that isn't what the post about bad women are for. Women are not a collective. There is no need to feel such a way.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:05 AM
-1

So now we are being sexist to this guy?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:26 AM
-1

I think she shouldn't be on the road, and she genuinely couldn't grasp the concept. I dont think people weponizing incompetence would do it so publicly.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:00 AM
-1

That's not what weaponized incompetence is. That is just regular incompetence, not everything is sexist.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 02:39 AM
1

Masculinity is a tough choice for any thesis. It's a very new idea, like within the last 80 years new. Feminists made it popular as a buzzword, you won't find it used, even today, outside anti-feminist conservatives and stoics, or sexist Feminists circles. It might be a good idea to define masculinity before you go researching. That's how all the other writers decide what history, before the 60s, they'll revise to fit such a work. Edit: There are those 2 video essays about Theoden and Aragorn fr…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 02:29 AM
2

How is this a men's issue?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:56 PM
4

What can you do? No risks, no rewards 🤷‍♂️
/r/MensRights20/07/24 11:20 AM
1

I'm well aware of the power of manipulation. I dislike her premise for its use, and I certainly have more experience in attraction methods and love than Andrew Tate or any of his knockoffs. If you want to be a pimp and have all the meaningless, boring sex that comes with it, like them, that's on you. Go and target the weak minded abuse victims like they did. You have been taught only to objectify women (or men) for something you think will make you happy, but it only ever works for a moment. The…
/r/MensRights20/07/24 10:59 AM
8

Varies by year
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/24 09:44 AM
1

It hangs around 10-20%
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/24 09:40 AM
1

I disagree with polygamy, I agree with anti polygamy laws. The reason they're not outdated is because marriage has tangible benefits from the government, including tax breaks. They do not exist to keep a 1-1 male-female ratio, they exist because the IRS doesn't want to deal with it.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 08:01 AM
1

You roll your eyes and let them keep going.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 07:40 AM
1

Do you have any idea what those words, in that order mean?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:48 AM
1

Ester Vilar is not in my approved list for MR readings. I wrote her off the moment she insisted that men dress for women, it only mirrors a feminist outlook that isn't true. It is women who judge women's fashion, and men who judge men's. Upon changing to a feminine hairstyle for a short time I witnessed this first hand, women generally did not care, it was men who judged. She brought alot of people into pill ideologies, all based on false premises anti-individuality.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:48 AM
0

This doesn't really have anything to do with men's rights or issues. This only confirms what everyone has said for hundreds of years, it is not related to men's rights or issues.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:03 AM
1

I think this is a case where pornography has a major hand in the situation. Japanese pornography tends to be questionable at the best of times.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 04:38 AM
1

No he's just trash and an opportunist, Which one?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:03 AM
0

"Do," not, "Are." "Hate," not, "hated." Unless you are asking if feminists are men, it should be, "Do feminists hate male family members?"
/r/MensRights19/07/24 11:09 PM
2

What exactly are you thinking? Like a BerenxLuthien story, girl ends up seeing a boy in the woods, but she's never seen a male before, and gets infatuated. Or some other story in which men and women are segregated? A reverse heracles, or attic war Fantasy would be detrimental to an MRM stance, and seen as a benevolent matriarchy curtailing male aggression. There's no real mythology about them outside of comic book Fantasy, not that I can easily find.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 11:37 PM
0

In most places, including the US and UK, that would depend on the charitable instrument, the documentation defining the purpose for the charity, beneficiary groups, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 10:58 PM
7

Charities are allowed to discriminate, they're Charities. They rely on donations. Edit: You can downvote me all you want, but you can also make a charity that provides this service for boys, and excludes girls. I didn't make the rules. They're generally allowed to discriminate because their entire existence relies on benefactors who donate based on whatever the charity addresses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 10:18 PM
20

A lawyer advising a divorce in that situation for financial purposes is a good professional. But this person is life coach.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 08:18 PM
8

The Duluth Model also supported punishments that would see innocent men brainwashed into believing they are an abuser.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:43 PM
4

If you knew the true history of feminism, as told by Janice Fiamengo and Christina Hoff Sommers, then you wouldn't need to ask this. Under feminism the women's lobby falsifies statistics and uses those things, not to help women, but to disenfranchise men. This became especially appearant after the 60s. The attempts to help boys, early in the boy's education crisis, were actively undermined by these lobbies. If you looked at history overall, without a feminist lens, then you'd see that it was far…
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:42 PM
5

Must have been a sub of middle schoolers and teenagers.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:25 PM
5

Every commentator I've seen has at least mentioned him.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:24 PM
6

That has been happening, but women have a victim status that supports their statements, and challenging that is seen as victim blaming. An emotional argument for sympathy for men, often seen as predatory, falls to numerous anecdotes of male on female hostility.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:18 PM
-14

And OP should know every single possible meaning before speaking, the words. OP places all blame for society's ills on men in the latter paragraphs, and that's enough to say OP is sexist, whether they're a sexist woman, or a self-hating man, idk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 06:50 PM
-5

They're very clearly a feminist, whether they're a woman, or men's lib feminist, idk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 06:44 PM
-8

Western society gives every individual all reasonable freedom. If a woman doesn't have agency, it is either a case of human trafficking, or she has willingly given it up, same with men. I do not surrender my treasures, nor do I share them. The fortune of my spirit is not to be blown into coins of brass and flung to the winds as alms for the poor of the spirit. I guard my treasures: my thought, my will, my freedom. And the greatest of these is freedom. -Ayn Rand
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 06:41 PM
16

[Altruism] is a moral system which holds that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the sole justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, value and virtue. This is the moral base of collectivism, of all dictatorships. -Ayn Rand
/r/MensRights17/07/24 06:34 PM
5

I have an opinion between Camile Paglia and Blaire White. P.S. For American radical feminists, Dworkin likely would have hated trans men as much as cis men, and enjoyed trans women, she regularly said things implying that she wanted the genocide of men. Solanas likely would hate both, from what I know she would have treated trans men as traitors and pickme's; and trans women with vitriol and confirmation that men are mutations of women, and jealous of them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 05:10 PM
15

Men's lib doesn't believe in men's rights, they follow radical feminist ideology and believe that all male issues are the fault of men. They believed that before reddit existed. The sub also engages in authoritarian censorship, as you have seen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 02:51 PM
1

I have yet to see a single link about Sommers' groundwork research. Looks like its all your fantasy. Firstly, I gave you the name of the book, Secondly, we were not talking about groundwork research, you are moving the goalpost, just like a radical feminist.
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:13 AM
1

If a standard is needed it certainly should not be yours. Your hostility would be the nail in the MRM's coffin. You have no knowledge of history. They were doing kill all men back in 1920s and Emmeline Pankhurst openly supported conscription of ONLY men in WW1. You are doing exactly what the feminists do, revisionism. A few extremists don't make a whole, I'll be the first to criticise radicals, even connect them to the main movement, that is politicking 101. But denouncing the people trying to h…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 07:16 PM
1

TLDR, you don't need to explain the rules of yes to English speakers. Many, if not all dialects of english also use, "yes," like this. It is not normally considered rude, idk who told you that. (Translation note: "Yes" may sound rude in English but this is how we answer in affirmative when asked about something, instead of "I do" or "you can" it's a pretty standard answer, remember Consuela from Family Guy)
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:45 AM
2

aura -1000000000 I am in my late 20s, I do not know what this means.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:38 AM
1

Never said they are MRAs and they don't have to but they do, so I will criticise them if they do a shit job of it. That attitude won't get us where we want to be as far as advocacy and lobbying goes. It's wrong to denounce the work of an ally simply because you hold them to your personal standards. Never seen a MRA advocate in favour of circumcision and conscription, in fact I have never seen a feminist do that. It's not a debatable topic. Just because tradcons idiots are allowed to spew shit on…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:03 AM
1

They're feminists, not MRAs, they don't have to speak on any of our issues. Circumcision and conscription is debated even in the MRM. And on the oppression that they have spoken on, do you not think that the dehumanizing rhetoric that Paglia is against is oppression? Or the systemic hostility towards men and boys in education, and the threat to our right for due process that Sommers fought?
/r/MensRights15/07/24 08:21 PM
1

Right wingers use things like crime statistics to promote that blacks, the poor, etc. are a problem in Western society, when Europe in general completely screwed over Africa and Blacks have been the most prominent targets of racism over the last centuries. They're capable of claiming that poor and black men oppress white and rich women. It shouldn't be unexpected, since Bax already described Feminists back then at the start of the XXth Century as privileged pretending to be oppressed, yet this i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 08:00 PM
1

while the explanation of how they are similar and the contradictions it generates isn't talked about enough. The only contradiction on the right that you claim is that they say black men oppress white women, while Europe colonized Africa. I've never heard a leading conservative state this about black men and white women, I've never even heard a fringe conservative say such a thing. They bring up legitimate concerns in response to baseless racism against white people. Yes, the issues often claime…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 07:42 PM
1

Don't let my current account's age fool you. As frosty_touch, I wrote the post on the Boston Massacre on here, and shared the Christina Hoff Sommers tweet, and wrote the posts on male friendships, and that one about cooking, most were well received. In another account, as independence_soft(numbers I can't remember), I wrote the condom education post on here. Idk if you are imitating a Russian, "for the lulz," but I am neither your comrade, nor progressive, I am centrist, and do not appreciate yo…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 10:29 AM
6

I agree with Phoenician_anarchist's points, and there are institutional threats to our rights, and we aren't given the same rights that women are. Nor are we given fair treatment in laws or other institutions. The idea of rights is old and natural, it isn't polarizing, that's some despotic bs to say. Suggest reading some American literature by the US founding fathers, as well as other humanist works. These people usually believed in equal justice, which we don't havve, many modern prison systems…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 10:25 AM
-3

And if your grandmother used a wheelchair, she would be a bicycle. False comparison. That is a ridiculous argument, it is concerning that that you refuse to see that what these groups are doing is basic Fear-mongering. They are attempting to cause fear against men to garner support from common constituents, that is Fear-mongering. Pointing out the connection between two groups and how they're incompatible with being pro-men is making this issue a zero-sum game because... Apparently a particular …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 07:10 AM
1

I didn't point out fear mongering itself, I pointed out how Right-wingers and Feminists use the same tactic of using crime stats to frame groups of men as dangerous and oppressive. That would constitute Fear-mongering, yes. You say it as if RWers considered male victims of sexual assault by women as legit (they don't. Another trait they share with Feminists). Most do, in fact, conservative commentator Brett Cooper recently called out such behavior in a video, and has done so a few times. In addi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 06:43 AM
-2

I didn't point out fear mongering itself, I pointed out how Right-wingers and Feminists use the same tactic of using crime stats to frame groups of men as dangerous and oppressive. That would constitute Fear-mongering, yes. You say it as if RWers considered male victims of sexual assault by women as legit (they don't. Another trait they share with Feminists). Most do, in fact, conservative commentator Brett Cooper recently called out such behavior in a video, and has done so a few times. In addi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 06:43 AM
1

Yea, of course, as Sommers and Fiamengo have stated, and campus feminist proved at their speeches, these groups have a very authoritarian outlook on free speech. I'm ashamed that I can't find the specific instance I'm referring to, but I didn't deny that the protests of these groups was a given.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 06:24 AM
1

They were certainly waiting to pounce, but I wouldn't go that far.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 05:22 AM
1

I believe the goal would be to write our politicians on the issues of this group. The problem is that statistics don't back discrimination against men in family court, women also complain about family court outcomes, but statistics say that courts are relatively fair, it seems to me that this indicates an issue where there may or may not be fairness, and everyone is miserable.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 05:06 AM
1

I want people to be aware of their rhetoric, circumcision is not rape, which is objectively worse, and happens to both adult males, and boys as young as newborns. In addition, it is a legitimate medical procedure, with adequate research to consider it a medical concern, the major argument is whether or not a parent should make this decision since there are potential medical issues directly resulting from foreskin. It is not a surgery in which an older child is held down by family members and cut…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 04:55 AM
-7

Fear-mongering is a basic political strategy. The entire left, not just feminists, use it on a regular basis, and it's why education is so important. It is not something explicitly used by the right. The left's consistant denunciation of the MRM utilizes this strategy, and your posts show that you fell for it. Politics is not a zero-sum game, we must take allies where they offer help, and those same allies may throw us under the bus, the intersectional WRGs of the women's lobby learned that the …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 03:16 AM
5

I don't believe fertility rates are going down, people just aren't having kids, and abortion is legal. As far as politics goes, a given government will change their immigration policies to account for population issues. I don't think the MRM has a specific say here, and each MRA would think differently. Suggest joining up with the republicans, or equivalent in your country, if you want to a serious political answer for low birth rates.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 03:08 AM
-12

It is objective, you may see my arguments below.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 02:15 AM
1

Last I actually saw of Fiamengo, she was getting booed off stage by angry women's studies majors over a very clear slip up in her speech during the campus rape crisis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 01:08 AM
1

OP actually stated, in the title, that circumcision is the worst sexual abuse. I am not, "keeping score." I want people to be aware of their rhetoric, circumcision is not rape, which is objectively worse, and happens to both adult males, and boys as young as newborns. In addition, it is a legitimate medical procedure, with adequate research to consider it a medical concern, the major argument is whether or not a parent should make this decision since there are potential medical issues directly r…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 12:52 AM
4

muslism The word you're looking for is either Muslim, or Islamic. What do you know about the prevalence of circumcision in Islamic culture? I'm not familiar with it.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 12:36 AM
1

I wouldn't say so, Paglia is her own person, and an interesting read regardless of what she supports or opposes. We can take a lot of good ethics from her. Her opposition to modern feminist theory is also something that everyday feminists believe (in my experiences with them), even if reddit, radical, and hard-core intersectionals deny her. Christina Hoff Sommers is the same, but she is effectively retired. When she was active, she was very effective opposition, going on national television at t…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 12:17 AM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:17 PM
-5

Fake or not, pill people are correctly profiled by the video, and i am a long time critic. Mgtows and pill people have only ever been a hindrance to men's rights. Also, rule 4.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:16 PM
-15

TLDR, there are worse sexual abuses than circumcision.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:09 PM
13

Never heard of the author, but I will use your synopsis to assume her premise. I disagree with the assumption that the world is, and had always been patriarchal, a simple look at history proves that it is far more complicated, and that feminist revisionism is objectively false in most cases. I disagree with intersectionality as a concept, our problems are our own, and the ideals from this way of thinking produced identity politics, and poor advocates in any given lobby/group. If I ever get about…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 01:25 PM
1

You realize that you can get penis enlargement surgery right? I'm not sure how much it would help, your problems seem more mental.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 12:35 PM
1

Our concerns suite the right more often. But they have been throwing us under the bus lately especially with the trans bathroom issue, and stereotyping. And I'm saying that as someone who leans right
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 12:13 PM
1

Ok? I follow Christina Hoff Sommers, and Camile Paglia's form of feminism, and disagree with nearly every other leading voice. That makes me a feminist. But I am more MRA than WRA. That said, some factors make it difficult for me to empathize with all victims. For example, what should I make of the womanizer who sleeps with one woman after another until one of them finally sexually assaults him (such as by ignoring his request for protected sex and forcing him into unprotected sex) or who gets h…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 11:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter