TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

independance_soft1 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by independance_soft1 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

That would mean a draft.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:01 PM
1

There is no such thing as appeasement, humans are inherently selfish, the man saw a tangible benefit, even if you don't see it. If I buy milk, you don't have the right to declare my purchase worthless without protest.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 08:24 PM
9

You can Google these court cases you know, they are public knowledge.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 01:02 PM
0

You can't abort a baby after they're out dude, and no man has ever paid child support on a fetus. Enough with the ad Hominem, you haven't provided any evidence to your claims.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 11:21 AM
3

I should not have to explain common knowledge. More abortions would be favorable to the anti-child support people. you know this is not true, women are never forced to pay child support, only men are cause women get to abort in the first place men don't have that option. also, you sound like a woman and obviously created an account like last week. I literally gave you a case in which a woman is paying child support, there are also cases where an ex-wife was made to pay alimony. This specific acc…
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:19 AM
4

Abortion has little to do with child support, and there are plenty of circumstances that make women pay child support. Roma Army, for example, reports that she is the parent paying child support due to her finances and split custody. The battle you want is unwinnable, and worthless to the MRM, women are not the enemy, the goal is to obtain and ensure fair and equal rights and treatment of men.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 10:00 AM
5

These issues don't intersect, and this post has no real relationship to men's rights or issues. I say this as a pro lifer, this is not something that is related to men's rights or issues and taking this stance would be detrimental to the movement.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:50 AM
5

How does this relate to men's issues or rights?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 09:42 AM
-4

If an independent man sees value in the behavior, who are you to criticise him? Especially when he's not here to defend himself, we don't know these people. Your attitude is why stoicism doesn't belong in advocacy, you sit there with your pill people and mgtow ideology, act like you know everything, like you have no power, and then demean other men to get on your level. All while real MRAs do all the hard work, that you believe can't be done.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:12 AM
0

I believe that rhetoric supports collective behavior, and it is objectively evil.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:06 AM
7

Get off reddit, you are too impressionable at your age. Listen in school, talk to your peers, watch multiple points of view, it is almost certain your ideas will change, gain experiences. Sure, there are people here who believe that women are all bad, but that isn't what the post about bad women are for. Women are not a collective. There is no need to feel such a way.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 04:05 AM
-1

So now we are being sexist to this guy?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:26 AM
-1

I think she shouldn't be on the road, and she genuinely couldn't grasp the concept. I dont think people weponizing incompetence would do it so publicly.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 03:00 AM
-1

That's not what weaponized incompetence is. That is just regular incompetence, not everything is sexist.
/r/MensRights21/07/24 02:39 AM
2

How is this a men's issue?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:56 PM
1

I'm well aware of the power of manipulation. I dislike her premise for its use, and I certainly have more experience in attraction methods and love than Andrew Tate or any of his knockoffs. If you want to be a pimp and have all the meaningless, boring sex that comes with it, like them, that's on you. Go and target the weak minded abuse victims like they did. You have been taught only to objectify women (or men) for something you think will make you happy, but it only ever works for a moment. The…
/r/MensRights20/07/24 10:59 AM
1

Do you have any idea what those words, in that order mean?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:48 AM
1

Ester Vilar is not in my approved list for MR readings. I wrote her off the moment she insisted that men dress for women, it only mirrors a feminist outlook that isn't true. It is women who judge women's fashion, and men who judge men's. Upon changing to a feminine hairstyle for a short time I witnessed this first hand, women generally did not care, it was men who judged. She brought alot of people into pill ideologies, all based on false premises anti-individuality.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:48 AM
0

This doesn't really have anything to do with men's rights or issues. This only confirms what everyone has said for hundreds of years, it is not related to men's rights or issues.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 05:03 AM
1

No he's just trash and an opportunist, Which one?
/r/MensRights20/07/24 12:03 AM
0

"Do," not, "Are." "Hate," not, "hated." Unless you are asking if feminists are men, it should be, "Do feminists hate male family members?"
/r/MensRights19/07/24 11:09 PM
2

What exactly are you thinking? Like a BerenxLuthien story, girl ends up seeing a boy in the woods, but she's never seen a male before, and gets infatuated. Or some other story in which men and women are segregated? A reverse heracles, or attic war Fantasy would be detrimental to an MRM stance, and seen as a benevolent matriarchy curtailing male aggression. There's no real mythology about them outside of comic book Fantasy, not that I can easily find.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 11:37 PM
0

In most places, including the US and UK, that would depend on the charitable instrument, the documentation defining the purpose for the charity, beneficiary groups, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 10:58 PM
7

Charities are allowed to discriminate, they're Charities. They rely on donations. Edit: You can downvote me all you want, but you can also make a charity that provides this service for boys, and excludes girls. I didn't make the rules. They're generally allowed to discriminate because their entire existence relies on benefactors who donate based on whatever the charity addresses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 10:18 PM
20

A lawyer advising a divorce in that situation for financial purposes is a good professional. But this person is life coach.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 08:18 PM
5

Every commentator I've seen has at least mentioned him.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:24 PM
6

That has been happening, but women have a victim status that supports their statements, and challenging that is seen as victim blaming. An emotional argument for sympathy for men, often seen as predatory, falls to numerous anecdotes of male on female hostility.
/r/MensRights18/07/24 07:18 PM
-14

And OP should know every single possible meaning before speaking, the words. OP places all blame for society's ills on men in the latter paragraphs, and that's enough to say OP is sexist, whether they're a sexist woman, or a self-hating man, idk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 06:50 PM
-5

They're very clearly a feminist, whether they're a woman, or men's lib feminist, idk.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 06:44 PM
-8

Western society gives every individual all reasonable freedom. If a woman doesn't have agency, it is either a case of human trafficking, or she has willingly given it up, same with men. I do not surrender my treasures, nor do I share them. The fortune of my spirit is not to be blown into coins of brass and flung to the winds as alms for the poor of the spirit. I guard my treasures: my thought, my will, my freedom. And the greatest of these is freedom. -Ayn Rand
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/07/24 06:41 PM
15

Men's lib doesn't believe in men's rights, they follow radical feminist ideology and believe that all male issues are the fault of men. They believed that before reddit existed. The sub also engages in authoritarian censorship, as you have seen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/07/24 02:51 PM
1

If a standard is needed it certainly should not be yours. Your hostility would be the nail in the MRM's coffin. You have no knowledge of history. They were doing kill all men back in 1920s and Emmeline Pankhurst openly supported conscription of ONLY men in WW1. You are doing exactly what the feminists do, revisionism. A few extremists don't make a whole, I'll be the first to criticise radicals, even connect them to the main movement, that is politicking 101. But denouncing the people trying to h…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 07:16 PM
1

TLDR, you don't need to explain the rules of yes to English speakers. Many, if not all dialects of english also use, "yes," like this. It is not normally considered rude, idk who told you that. (Translation note: "Yes" may sound rude in English but this is how we answer in affirmative when asked about something, instead of "I do" or "you can" it's a pretty standard answer, remember Consuela from Family Guy)
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:45 AM
2

aura -1000000000 I am in my late 20s, I do not know what this means.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:38 AM
1

Never said they are MRAs and they don't have to but they do, so I will criticise them if they do a shit job of it. That attitude won't get us where we want to be as far as advocacy and lobbying goes. It's wrong to denounce the work of an ally simply because you hold them to your personal standards. Never seen a MRA advocate in favour of circumcision and conscription, in fact I have never seen a feminist do that. It's not a debatable topic. Just because tradcons idiots are allowed to spew shit on…
/r/MensRights16/07/24 01:03 AM
1

They're feminists, not MRAs, they don't have to speak on any of our issues. Circumcision and conscription is debated even in the MRM. And on the oppression that they have spoken on, do you not think that the dehumanizing rhetoric that Paglia is against is oppression? Or the systemic hostility towards men and boys in education, and the threat to our right for due process that Sommers fought?
/r/MensRights15/07/24 08:21 PM
1

Don't let my current account's age fool you. As frosty_touch, I wrote the post on the Boston Massacre on here, and shared the Christina Hoff Sommers tweet, and wrote the posts on male friendships, and that one about cooking, most were well received. In another account, as independence_soft(numbers I can't remember), I wrote the condom education post on here. Idk if you are imitating a Russian, "for the lulz," but I am neither your comrade, nor progressive, I am centrist, and do not appreciate yo…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 10:29 AM
1

Yea, of course, as Sommers and Fiamengo have stated, and campus feminist proved at their speeches, these groups have a very authoritarian outlook on free speech. I'm ashamed that I can't find the specific instance I'm referring to, but I didn't deny that the protests of these groups was a given.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 06:24 AM
1

They were certainly waiting to pounce, but I wouldn't go that far.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 05:22 AM
1

I believe the goal would be to write our politicians on the issues of this group. The problem is that statistics don't back discrimination against men in family court, women also complain about family court outcomes, but statistics say that courts are relatively fair, it seems to me that this indicates an issue where there may or may not be fairness, and everyone is miserable.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 05:06 AM
1

Last I actually saw of Fiamengo, she was getting booed off stage by angry women's studies majors over a very clear slip up in her speech during the campus rape crisis.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/24 01:08 AM
4

muslism The word you're looking for is either Muslim, or Islamic. What do you know about the prevalence of circumcision in Islamic culture? I'm not familiar with it.
/r/MensRights15/07/24 12:36 AM
1

I wouldn't say so, Paglia is her own person, and an interesting read regardless of what she supports or opposes. We can take a lot of good ethics from her. Her opposition to modern feminist theory is also something that everyday feminists believe (in my experiences with them), even if reddit, radical, and hard-core intersectionals deny her. Christina Hoff Sommers is the same, but she is effectively retired. When she was active, she was very effective opposition, going on national television at t…
/r/MensRights15/07/24 12:17 AM
1

What does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:17 PM
-5

Fake or not, pill people are correctly profiled by the video, and i am a long time critic. Mgtows and pill people have only ever been a hindrance to men's rights. Also, rule 4.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 09:16 PM
13

Never heard of the author, but I will use your synopsis to assume her premise. I disagree with the assumption that the world is, and had always been patriarchal, a simple look at history proves that it is far more complicated, and that feminist revisionism is objectively false in most cases. I disagree with intersectionality as a concept, our problems are our own, and the ideals from this way of thinking produced identity politics, and poor advocates in any given lobby/group. If I ever get about…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 01:25 PM
1

You realize that you can get penis enlargement surgery right? I'm not sure how much it would help, your problems seem more mental.
/r/MensRights14/07/24 12:35 PM
1

Our concerns suite the right more often. But they have been throwing us under the bus lately especially with the trans bathroom issue, and stereotyping. And I'm saying that as someone who leans right
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/07/24 12:13 PM
1

Ok? I follow Christina Hoff Sommers, and Camile Paglia's form of feminism, and disagree with nearly every other leading voice. That makes me a feminist. But I am more MRA than WRA. That said, some factors make it difficult for me to empathize with all victims. For example, what should I make of the womanizer who sleeps with one woman after another until one of them finally sexually assaults him (such as by ignoring his request for protected sex and forcing him into unprotected sex) or who gets h…
/r/MensRights14/07/24 11:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter