TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

indigoanasazi Archive

View 0 posts and 185 comments by indigoanasazi on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

holy feminist concern trolling batman!
/r/MensRights20/08/17 03:19 PM
1

If your SO said she was raped and you broke up with her, you know that all her friends, people you don't even know, and her family would all be out for your blood.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 12:30 AM
4

Alpha/Beta dichotomy isn't helping. The only reason this is even a word is so that some guys can jack off over how 'alpha' they are, as a way to increase their status with women, while failing to address the issues with gender relations in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 09:44 PM
18

Someone's never worked a real job. Guys show up early and leave late, or they get a reputation as an asshole.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 12:34 AM
2

This is exactly what I envisioned. Some sort of ridiculous honey-bound weed and pill bar, drizzled with liquor
/r/MensRights22/04/16 11:48 AM
90

It's already been taken down. Zoe Quinn and Randi Harper apparently collaborated to lean hard on Kickstarter to suspend funding, and the creator of Social Autopsy is going berserk on twitter about going to war with them. Harper and Quinn are both pretty upset that someone's hedging in on their extortion game. And Social Autopsy's creator is going off about threatening phone calls from both, referencing something about Zoe getting pissed that she was going to bring it all crashing down.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:21 PM
-2

it's their lifestyle and want to take their body to the next level. Read: "I need to get super-jacked in order to get a girlfriend".
/r/MensRights16/03/16 04:17 AM
1

Or if she decides to break off the engagement because it turns out you're not as rich as advertised.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 05:44 PM
2

He's on the D list, but it still got him a 30 minute show on Comedy Central for a while.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 12:42 PM
2

Notice the part when he says 'When I actually had abs'.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:58 PM
16

To be fair, no matter this woman's beliefs, she is probably going to be an idiot. If she's a Christian, she'll be a Christian retard. If she's a capitalist, she'll be a capitalist retard. If she's an anarchist, she'll be an anarchist retard. Hell, if she likes the way cats meow, she'll probably become a cat meowing retard, slitting dog's throats in alleys for daring to exist when they make incorrect animal sounds.
/r/MensRights29/12/15 05:28 PM
2

I'm a teacher, and trust me: there are plenty of 14 year old boys who appear to be prepubescent still.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 02:19 PM
4

Just fuck my shit up
/r/MensRights15/08/15 07:52 PM
-9

To be fair, most judges in Texas would just throw the book at the dude. This is the judge going out on a limb and offering the dude a way out of what was surely a 100% chance of jail, by complying with his crap. It's pretty silly, but in Texas at least, especially the far east and west, county judges are known for running fucking WIERD courts and dishing out tons of alternative sentences, since they know they won't be able to squeeze much cash out of most folks, and that jail means job loss, and…
/r/MensRights08/08/15 05:06 PM
14

Boys seriously do better though in an all-male environment.
/r/MensRights07/07/15 03:52 AM
18

....Isn't this basically what Jezebel itself is doing?
/r/MensRights14/06/15 02:06 AM
1

Every surgery carries a risk. Every single insignificant procedure could result in your death. And some people may later come to regret the decision they made. All of that means there's a risk of lawsuits. So most doctors are loath to do it.
/r/MensRights04/06/15 07:53 PM
1

Yeah, next you'll be telling me that jews aren't white.
/r/MensRights29/05/15 11:39 AM
1

Their bodies and arms are built entirely differently. This is a mechanics thing. De/Dr = IMA
/r/MensRights25/05/15 12:00 AM
3

Without endemic malaria, the sickle-cell mutation is purely disadvantageous for now paranoid eyes
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:06 AM
5

Men are mobbed and killed or permanently injured all the time by crowds of dudes hoping to get some pussy or female approval. I think the comparison is apt. You can quit getting triggered by things you never experienced, now.
/r/MensRights09/05/15 02:23 PM
-5

If liberal arts actually gave people wisdom, sure. Instead, critical theory means that people are simply applying marxist/feminist/transsexual/ethnic interpretations to things that have no need for it. More to the point, we live in the information age, and there is nothing an English or History major can do that the general populace isn't well-equipped to do, since there are no highly expensive tools and equipment that you have to train to use, unlike the sciences. It's just reading, writing, an…
/r/MensRights02/05/15 05:16 PM
4

Money may not buy happiness, but it sure is a prerequisite to it. You have to be able to buy your way out of misery and death sometimes.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 05:01 PM
21

Cool, so let's just kill all rape victims. Better they die than live with the challenges arising from that trauma.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:53 PM
0

This is what happens when you aren't able to hit stupid people.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 09:17 PM
-1

I hate to be that guy, but I'm gonna be that guy. Notice how more than 50% of radfems are jews? Yeah.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 01:33 AM
5

If this is the direction we are going, I'm out. This shit is unrelated.
/r/MensRights21/02/15 02:45 PM
5

The reality is that rabid feminism in the US has the backing of a certain political party.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 04:24 PM
2

Except that the prison industrial complex GENERATES revenue. Due to prison commissaries and slave labor.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:51 PM
0

No offense, but 'educate yourself by believing in utter horseshit that I endorse' is basically a bad faith argument. Prove him wrong. Popular belief does not define reality, even if the reality is hurtful.
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:47 PM
1

But if transsexual, then not bro? How brony exists?
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:42 PM
1

YOU HAVE TO EAT ALL THE EGGS
/r/PussyPass11/12/14 05:59 AM
5

Yeah, just hide your powerlevel. Some parents care more about ideology than their children. Like, this is the same thing that kids who have parents who disown them for being gay or atheist go through.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:18 AM
4

Don't try to convince plebs. It's hopeless. Just hide your powerlevel, especially if you're too poor to not live with those types of toxic people.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:13 AM
2

death threats :I Get tougher, or get the fuck off the internet.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:12 AM
1

Please tell me the pirates will be crashing the tea party.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 02:34 PM
3

He didn't need to, because there were other movements out there already raising hell in his stead. It's the same thing with Gandhi. He did not need to offer violent opposition, because there was already widespread social unrest and a few riots because war heroes from WW2 were SUPER PISSED OFF that even though they had been lauded with numerous awards and risked their asses, that India was not allowed to determine its own future. Rabblerousers have a purpose, but that means that the philosophers …
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:34 AM
7

hurt herself No, she killed their children and lied to her husband about it. To preserve her feelings and status.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:54 PM
1

It's not even that. There are a number of very significant legal cases involving women at the turn of the 20th century, where cold-blooded murderers were given unusually lenient sentences due to their status as women.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 03:49 PM
-3

Women, as a protected class never faced the same kind of ostracism that men do. While they might be ridiculed and not taken seriously, there is a far smaller chance that someone will try to beat them to death for their opinions. The MRM(especially the MRM as it exists here) shares a lot in common with second wave feminism(the period of time you're referring to), in both its goals, objections, and flaws. But men face a much harder battle, because they have never been a protected class.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:51 AM
2

All I'm saying is that women have classically been a protected class, did not have to worry about securing their futures past acquiring a mate(something that they did passively), and definitely didn't have to risk their lives in war. They even had extensive legal protection to ensure that the means of their existence(husbands/boyfriends) didn't harm them, as well as society's protection due to being a 'weaker sex'. Seems pretty cushy, to me.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:36 AM
2

Did they? A half century ago? 1963? Around the time the first oral contraceptives hit the market?
/r/MensRights31/12/13 06:22 AM
2

But you have the right to welfare babies funded at the cost of other people's money. Great job, proving you're not the stereotype, sister. Real, real good job you're doing for Team Minority. By the way, you can't win arguments against me. I'm not white, either. ;) Go campaign for your skewed version of social justice elsewhere, or confine yourself back to the hugbox of the cringepire/feminist subreddits. You're obviously in favor of a choice when it comes to abortion, so your regard for the live…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 01:12 AM
2

Cool, so if the man doesn't want the baby, does he have the option to sever ties and remove his financial obligation? Does he have the option to ensure the baby survives to term and is protected from abortion? After all, women don't impregnate themselves.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 11:27 PM
2

Is it really failure if they actually could not get laid, even if they tried? If something is so impossible that effort is not going to make a difference, or if you really just can't care, then there really is only one rational option: To quit the game. As long as they're not bitter or hateful or jealous, I can't see why you should have a problem with them. Your interests and goals simply have nonintersection. Neither person should look down on the other. You're not playing the same game.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/13 06:46 PM
3

Well, it is. Voting is backed by the power of a government that abides by the vote. Meaning that it's backed by guns and military. And a refusal to abide by a vote basically means a breach of contract, and gives subjects a legitimate excuse to overthrow a government. It is a very civilized layer placed between decision-making and violence. A bloodless war, if you will.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:06 PM
10

Obvious_grendel HE IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL HIS NAME MEANS OBVIOUS TROLL GUYS
/r/MensRights23/12/13 08:02 PM
3

Only weak people abuse I think this is a really, really naive way of thinking about things. Some people are just plain awful and aren't weak in any way, but do it just because they can, and they gain something from it. Claiming that weak people abuse, and that abuse creates weakness creates a logical cycle that ultimately leads to "Well, the abuser is the REAL victim here!"
/r/MensRights20/12/13 12:58 AM
4

I'm upvoting this because GWW's comment deserves to be further up on the list. This is a question that SHOULD be asked, and that has a very good answer to justify it.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 10:49 PM
3

Wishful thinking on their part.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:58 AM
1

That's because in the late 90's there were laws passed to shut down that kind of activity. It killed the industry overnight. Just how it is. Either way, your average white American woman is an ogre. God forbid men want to date attractive women.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 11:04 PM
1

....Is this actually sarcasm?
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:32 AM
5

SO BRAVE. Your past posts lead me to believe you're just here to stir shit up. Back to SRS with thee!
/r/MensRights05/12/13 01:26 AM
2

What you actually see is that a lot of guys who work out assume that their hard work means they're entitled to women, and the idea of a weaker/softer guy with a woman fills them with seething rage.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:34 AM
2

Yeah, but that's because people don't automatically assume that your body means you're a terrible person. They just write you off. Fat people garner outright hate.
/r/MensRights11/11/13 12:32 AM
1

wat
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:41 PM
0

It's too convenient to claim that unattractive men are immoral and objectively bad because basically, attractive = strong. So that means that unattractive = unhealthy, which is often considered immoral. Maybe if busybodies would quit throwing fat and skinny dudes under the bus to assert their own alpha status, this wouldn't be a thing. But as it is now, /r/MensRights is still fully in line with the rest of Reddit and whiteknights by spouting off how you are an awful person for not spending 40 ho…
/r/MensRights10/11/13 06:22 PM
7

Sure is TheRedPill in here. "You should hit the gym and be alpha" "Let me brag about how tall, handsome and alpha I am." "If you aren't at the top of the pack and swole, enjoy dying alone." Normals. :/
/r/MensRights09/11/13 04:35 PM
2

(anglo), because in certain circles mediterranean, slavic, or iberian heritage ALSO bars you from the whiteboy club.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 12:52 AM
3

Because we've been under attack since the beginning of the month, because this is a major month where Men's Rights Activists try to push awareness since they have a cause that people can't legit stand against without being seen as assholes. Have you not noticed the sheer amount of REALLY, REALLY weak circumcision threads with no responses? Have you not seen the tone policing turned up to 11? Haven't you seen the sheer amount of SRS guys wandering around completely openly?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:56 AM
5

Repeating the warning! Do not respond! This guy is an SRS supporter and a major player in the cringepire who is an admin on an account phishing site. Watch out, guys. This dude is literally cancer. Anything you say while this guy is watching could end up repeated anywhere, and if your account name is the same anywhere else on the internet, you might find a genuine IRL flashmob attacking you.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:43 AM
11

This guy is an SRS supporter and a major player in the cringepire who is an admin on an account phishing site. Watch out, guys. This dude is literally cancer. Anything you say while this guy is watching could end up repeated anywhere, and if your account name is the same anywhere else on the internet, you might find a genuine IRL flashmob attacking you. Also, he's a drug dealer.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:42 AM
-1

The henhouse is in full effect in this thread. So yes.
/r/MensRights02/11/13 05:58 PM
1

Yes, painting ourselves into some 'total package' framework ideology deal is a GREAT idea. That's TOTALLY not how the feminism movement got hijacked by nutbags, or how the skepticism movement turned into magical skyfairies and euphoria and was then swept under the rug. This is a terrible idea. The issues we have are self-evident. And even if some of us agree with part of the framework, I doubt that most will agree with ALL the issues everyone would like to discuss. I am writing these with an eye…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 02:26 PM
6

What a shitty fucking beta you are, then. Does it encourage you to know that the neutered way you were raised makes women drier than the Mojave Desert? You aren't getting any sex out of whiteknighting. Quit being a slave.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:38 AM
8

It is a losing game. What do you expect to happen? No, seriously. How are we supposed to make a difference, when we don't have the automatic credibility, aid, and social power that women do? I mean, even when people DO STUFF, the community throws them under the rocks(redpill/MGTOW). Men's Rights Reform won't happen in the current system.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 02:00 AM
1

Sure is a whole lotta euphoria in here. Le fedora tip
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:19 AM
3

Not many, honestly. Texas is one of the few states that doesn't really have woman-friendly divorce laws. Note how it says -conviction-. That is different from allegations. You can't just claim your spouse abused you. In order to qualify for alimony consideration in that case, you need a legal paper trail behind you that includes a conviction.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:48 PM
3

If she has a house on that land, that's huge, due to the state's focus on the homestead as a mark of self-sufficiency. This here link gives a good summary of spousal maintenance laws in Texas. http://www.divorcenet.com/resources/divorce/spousal-support/understanding-and-calculating-alimony-te
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:32 PM
3

This is actually an important one, here. Property is king in Texas. If she owns land, then there is virtually no way that you will end up paying alimony. Texas laws allow alimony for 10 year marriages, but I don't know a single divorced person who managed to win alimony in Texas. Child support? Yes, you will be locked into that. But you won't have to worry about alimony.
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:25 PM
4

I do. Women don't leave middle school, because they aren't forced to leave. Women get a pass when it comes to acting like children due to their sexual value.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 01:04 PM
1

Kinda have to agree. Cartwheels were always a super-girl thing, even back when I was in school. Blame overprotective and litigious parents. It's the same reason why I can't remove disruptive students from class to get teaching done, and why I'm not allowed to give a 0 grade for a student who does no work, rarely shows up, and disrupts class regularly, and even encourages other students to stop listening to me. Education was a lot nicer when kids didn't have rights.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:25 AM
-2

I guess women just have to work out raising their illegitimate children on their own too, then.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:52 PM
-2

If we refuse to confront them at all, we've already lost. Let it happen, then. And the downvote brigade itself will speak for itself.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:29 PM
-1

implying I was talking about dressing provocatively I was talking about the actual, risky act of having sex with someone. It inherently risks pregnancy, even with birth control. You're trying to shift the conversation here. Enjoying sex is like enjoying extreme sports: risky. Do I have a right to have my extreme sport addiction subsidized? Your endometriosis is irrelevant. You are taking the drug not as birth control, but as an endometriosis treatment. It's therapy for a disorder. You'd be given…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:27 PM
2

implying she'd date anyone who hadn't cured SUPER-CANCER. Also they have to be a billionaire and fuck like a tiger.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:18 PM
2

They have to cling to it because men are disposable. A woman is always a woman. A man can lose his man card for basically nothing at all. I mean, sexually speaking, a man's world is dangerous as fuck. They're just doing what they can to at least put on the facade of being attractive, and unassailable. And they're also technically in favor of sexual equity, just in their own way. A woman’s value is mainly determined by her fertility and beauty. A man’s value is mainly determined by his resources,…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 09:07 PM
3

It's true, though. We aren't taken seriously because we have complaints. And that makes us less than men in the eyes of many others. How can a Men's Rights movement be taken seriously, when the majority of men would rather just throw us under the bus and take the shit deal they're being offered, because they think shit tastes good until the disease has run through their system and kills them? I mean, Laugh at RoK all you want, but before the MRM was being talked about at all 'round these parts, …
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:55 PM
-3

I thought that sex-positives were taking slut back? Would it have been better to say "don't be a goddamned sex-positive"? The meaning would be the same. "Don't do risky things if you can't afford to pay for the resulting consequences of your actions." Why is it that if you go skydiving, you don't get free insurance, but if you fuck, you're suddenly entitled to all this free shit? The negative consequences of both create a helpless human who's now dependent on others. This is just plain equity. W…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:50 PM
0

I was gonna come in here and go on a tear about self-policing, concern trolls, and feminist/SRS infiltration attempting to hamper open discussion on topics, but it looks like most of what I wanted to say is here. tl;dr fuck it all, we're branded as virgin bronies just because we're here(and it's the reason why the most recognizable and credible MRA voices are female). Who the fuck cares what others think of our speech? For the most part, the insane nutball views are ignored, and without the aid …
/r/MensRights01/10/13 12:33 AM
1

You're also the most well-known, recognized, and respected voices 'round these parts and elsewhere. Take that as you will.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:12 PM
2

GWW says the same thing that redpillers do and y'all love her. God, can't even get over the bias in our own community.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:07 PM
8

This is a great assessment of it all. It should be noted that shortly after David Wong was put on the staff, two things happened: Shit got SUPER LIBERAL super fast. So basically blame Wong, yes. Another interesting parallel: Cracked has always been a more casual Something Awful, with editors taking credit for things that the forum users generate. It is likely that Cracked was the target of an extremely successful forum hijacking by feminists, just like Something Awful.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 09:42 PM
2

......Western privilege?
/r/MensRights15/09/13 11:25 PM
-1

Or perhaps we can just start ignoring the concern trolls.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:36 PM
3

believing that words can make a woman forced to sleep with you Man, it's like you believe that women are stupid enough to act like robots and fuck guys in response to a few simple words. Looks like YOU'RE the one buying into the delusion.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:56 PM
2

You know, I find it very telling that you are trying to shame me by taking away my man card, by calling me an angry 20 year old.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:22 PM
1

We will always be a joke of a movement, seeing as how women control the narrative. Casuals will never take an interest in the MRM. They are too pussy-driven.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:14 PM
-5

Your post history I am a feminist ahahaha. Hahahahaaaa. The brigades are in full force. I suppose you were directed here from one of your awful little subs.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:12 PM
0

That's just the loudest feminists rumbling to shake things up. I can tell you right now, as someone who has frequented the online roleplaying scene for over a decade: Women are interested in hyper-sexy characters as a power fantasy. I can guarantee you right now that if you go into an erotic roleplaying community right now, a number of women playing female characters are going to be playing super-sexualized females with impossibly exaggerated parts, who want to be involved in scenarios where men…
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:09 PM
9

Let's not forget FUCKING SIERRA DEATHS GOD, I JUST WALKED IN THE DESERT AND DIED OF DEHYDRATION 3 SCREENS IN
/r/MensRights14/09/13 04:01 PM
0

Yeah, sorry, no. I have a job, and I would like to keep it.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 07:23 AM
-1

It does when you're choking them out with your dick.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 10:54 PM
0

Dying while bringing a fetus to term has roughly the same impact as aborting a fetus, fitness-wise, since most people have like, 2-3 children. Doesn't count as a parasite.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 07:21 AM
1

Except that parasites are defined as organisms that benefit at the expense of another organism's biological fitness. Seeing as how biological fitness is defined as surviving young that go on to reproduce, it would seem that a fetus is NOT a parasite, since it is in fact, offspring.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 11:33 PM
0

You're right. The groping statistics are super-low. Because men's danger in being assaulted is PHYSICAL HARM. Women cry when they're ogled or brushed against, and people suddenly enact all these policies to protect them. Men are expected to tough out regular beatings and threat of death, and this is treated as the norm. See: Slutwalks, being mugged, and victim-blaming.
/r/MensRights10/09/13 10:47 PM
2

That's THE POINT. The very point that PUAs and redpillers are trying to make is that manhood is EXTREMELY insecure and prone to imploding at any time. Men are very easily socially destroyed, it isn't even funny. That's because society doesn't assign them intrinsic worth, unlike women, who get free vagina passes because childbirth. It is very easy to have your man card revoked, and to be shunned and thrown away. You cannot hate these men for doing what they can to secure a bit of happiness for th…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 09:41 PM
27

The decline came far earlier. Sometime around SA's lowest point...like 2006-2007, like before the Let's Play craze set in...SA was under massive attack frequently, and then in '08, Lowtax had that huge, public breakdown after passwords were hacked, and the mods really moved in and made a big grab for power. What resulted was gender feminists taking over, for various reasons, mostly because of a number of feminist mods, and white knight mods, and the established 10bux precedent, which made it eas…
/r/MensRights10/09/13 03:57 AM
2

Those are also atypical, niche games. The kinds of games kids these days play involve very little text. I'm not attacking video games at all. Down, boy.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 03:45 AM
10

Right. I was in the same situation as a small child, but I am not typical of your usual student. Especially in this new, modern environment. There are a lot of alternatives to reading, now. And in fact, due to the popularity of female-centric media, a lot of kids now view reading as a "Girl's hobby". The kind of information that interests boys, sadly, has mostly migrated to interactive and video media, which does some harm to their literacy.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 03:27 AM
11

They don't need to. As a teacher, I can tell you right now that most 16 year old boys I see cannot read or write at grade level. I mean seriously. When I was in high school, the exit exam was at a 7th grade level. The English STAAR tests in Texas now are more rigorous, but you still manage a passing grade with below 50%. Blame it on NCLB and ideas like merit-based pay. If you create a system that can be gamed, teachers and administrators WILL game it. So will legislators, who do not want to be e…
/r/MensRights08/09/13 03:06 AM
0

In the age of cheap and easy birth control? YES.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 01:29 PM
-2

Sorry, but MRAs have a number of different views, and don't all ascribe to your particular brand of morality. You don't own me, nor do you own the movement. You can leave if you don't like disagreement, though. I hear there's a movement that's big on censoring any sort of dissenting views.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 05:03 AM
-1

But apparently women own men.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:18 AM
-7

It was hyperbole. Point is, that if someone does something awful like that, they should be expected to be shamed or worse.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 03:16 AM
-11

Cool, so I hope you don't mind if she is shamed for being a murderer and a whore. My mind, my opinion. I'll speak it. You can't force me to think this woman isn't a monster.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 01:15 AM
2

Hobbyist groups, ESPECIALLY sports-oriented ones have hierarchies based on merit. Get your social justice shit out of here.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 01:18 AM
9

Dating is a compatibility test. This is basically the reason that nobody fucking likes elaborate dates anymore, except for women with princess complexes. The woman doesn't want any commitment, and the man doesn't want any risk? Meet up at a Starbuck's, and nobody's going to begrudge coffee's costs on either side.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 12:49 AM
3

Nightwing is one of those cases, man. Feminist writer makes essay on how women in comics are just objects to win or threaten, proceeds to write Nightwing as a sexually aggressive wreck of a man who apparently submits to strong females, gets raped on top of a roof, and IT CANT BE RAPE, HES A PWRFUL MAN SO SEXXY OF COURSE HE WANTED THAT STRONG VAGINA
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:38 PM
-1

Go back to SRS, genderqueerfag. Ain't no trigger warnings here.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 12:35 PM
3

Street smarts are possessed by women who occupy the 'streets'. i.e. ethnics. Feminism is about white women's tears.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 04:12 PM
5

childhood friend winning This is basically what never happens. The guy always ends up with the tsundere/the girl who shows violent opposition to him
/r/MensRights04/08/13 02:05 PM
1

why boner why
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:11 PM
-1

I would fuck guys. I still don't believe that gays should get married or that open homosexuality is like, a morally acceptable thing. The world is more complex than stupid tags like homophobia.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:06 PM
11

If you can't handle images from a safe space on your computer, you really aren't ready to live on planet earth where things may actually happen in your face.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:00 PM
10

I'm not sorry that I am not an emotionless protector-provider robot for women to abuse as they will.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 05:57 PM
-3

Cool, so is bride-kidnapping and ejaculating into the mouths of young boys to help them grow faster also kosher?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 12:28 AM
0

It works because they're using a very specific approach under controlled circumstances, and are expecting to get thrown. There's a reason nobody uses judo or aikido in MMA seriously.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 11:58 PM
2

Go to hell. An eye for an eye. The problem with this shit in the first place is that people aren't fighting back.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:29 PM
2

Yeah, that doesn't actually work. If you have 100 lbs on someone, you're going to destroy them. There's a reason there's weight classes in MMA.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:27 PM
0

He's really not. You're just too blind to see that.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:25 PM
8

Fuck off already. No amount of tone-policing is going to ever get the MRM any respect. We don't control the narrative. Tear feminism down.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:15 PM
24

Oh, go fuck yourself. It's not like we're going to be winning any respect by being NICE to the opposition here. We're already labelled as mysoginistic virgin neckbeards who cry bitter tears over not getting sex. Quit dancing around these women like delicate little flowers. If they're so equal to us, they can tolerate a little coarse language. They can probably stand to be shoved around a bit too, when they start shit.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:56 PM
3

I don't know if you realize this, but much of the US has plenty of laws in place that tell people what to do with their bodies. For instance, in 33 states in the US, if you're infected with tuberculosis, you can be ordered under house arrest on pain of death, without any due process. We -CAN- restrict other people's bodies when other's lives are at stake. There is ABSOLUTELY precedence for this matter. If the fetus has rights and is human, why aren't we protecting it? If it doesn't have rights a…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 09:24 PM
2

That's a lie. The MGTOW forums are very much about economic conservatism, and the only reason I don't hang around there is their incessant THANKS OBAMAing.
/r/MensRights13/07/13 01:13 AM
-1

Oh wow, I think you just broke redditor's minds. But it is true. Just look at the hamfisted political points espoused by MGTOW that keep them from gaining any major traction.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 02:08 PM
3

To be fair, the folks at conventions are the most scummy of casual socialfags who don't hide their powerlevels, mixed in with trendy faux-nerds whoring for attention.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 12:19 AM
1

Only when you're a man, is it never the answer.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:17 AM
-1

oh god WE SHOULD HAVE PUT A TRIGGER WARNING!
/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:15 PM
3

Back to the fempire with thee!
/r/MensRights07/07/13 09:14 PM
2

Shaming a man's emotions and expression. Classy.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 12:47 AM
8

So do it anonymously.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:36 PM
7

One thing to keep in mind. You have to have your complaints IGNORED for it to count as sexual harrassment. File a formal complaint. If you are not heard, scream and sue your head off. This is a classic example of 'creating a hostile work environment' and if not sexual harrassment, it is definitely general harrassment.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 09:35 PM
6

No. Don't do this. This is why things have progressed as they have. Feminists know that they have a higher social value. They use that power to define the narrative in which these movements exist. Remember that most people do not research sources. They only read the smear and assume it to be truth. ESPECIALLY if it already confirms preexisting views, and preexisting views are by far, that Women are Pure, Men are Shitbags. We MUST raise our voices and get the truth heard. Being quiet only results…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 10:33 PM
5

And you're a bleeding heart. I hope I never find you in the armed forces, either.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:39 PM
4

If it wins the war? Yes. You value your own people's lives and quality of life over others. Why would I weep for my enemies? They aren't weeping for me and my own.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:27 PM
4

Real talk. If I have to choose between a child's life and my own? And it isn't my child? Yeah, the child's not gonna make it.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:23 PM
7

She ain't gonna fuck you. The reward isn't worth it.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:22 PM
4

War's ugly. It's won via brutal methods. There are clear winners and losers, and if one side is willing to go no holds barred, and the other one isn't, then the outcome is going to be very clear from the beginning unless there's an immense difference in strength. There is nothing honorable, and maintaining pretenses of honor only serves to weaken yourself. The only thing honor does is improve your standing amongst your peers, and guess what, the shame of loss is worse. Think about how to apply t…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:19 PM
3

More like Did you do better on your math than your verbal and want a job and money? Pick a STEM field. Did you do better on your verbal and want a job and money? Pick a STEM field Your essay? STEM field Surprise surprise, most successful scientists are socially adept, and are extremely strong in all three areas. Most successful folks in the humanities or writing are lucky or already successful prior to entering the fields. If you want to learn actual skills, pick STEM. If you want an education i…
/r/MensRights27/06/13 07:13 PM
3

I've given you an upvote. My opinion is an unpopular one, but if men are forbidden from using social, peaceful methods to make their points, what other path does anyone have, other than to use what men naturally have an advantage in over women? Political correctness and popularity contests be damned.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 12:54 AM
7

Is murder a workplace hazard because I'm a teacher and I ocassionally would like to strangle a student? How about statutory rape? Jesus fucking christ. I'm not going to go into a rant on drug culture, but THIS here is the reason why people don't take drug legalization seriously. "WELL THERE WERE DRUGS AND I CAN'T RESIST THEM".
/r/MensRights26/06/13 08:31 PM
1

Man, this already exists. Go visit 4chan's /jp/ boards some time. They have guides on faking autism to gain government bucks because "Only attractive, confident people have anything to gain from social interaction and working"
/r/MensRights25/06/13 09:32 PM
3

In other words, it's just a modified slide. A voteslide, if you will. And people called me paranoid.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:50 PM
4

Lots of 4channers are MRAs. The distaste comes because 4chan was really hit hard by all the PUA/Redpill stuff before MRM became a large, recognized movement on the internet. And so it's...pardon the pun, a little hard to swallow.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:12 PM
6

I WARNED YOU ABOUT FORUMSLIDES, BRO! I WARNED YOU
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:10 PM
1

612 Wharf Avenue
/r/MensRights22/06/13 06:35 PM
1

You mean: If the mother wants, she can scramble its brains like so much eggs and never be responsible for it, AT ALL
/r/MensRights22/06/13 06:31 PM
1

Female privilege isn't granted by feminists. Much of it is granted by men.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 11:05 PM
-2

And then hey! Take some hormones! 4channers who feel they're too beta to get ahead are doing it. Free female privilege!
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:55 PM
2

Step 4 is "WILL YOU SLEEP WITH ME NOW?". Vehement white knights are like the actual "Nice Guys" that people hate, as opposed to actual nice people who are written off.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 07:54 PM
27

Restraining order. NOW. I don't care if they don't do anything. I don't care if the cops roll their eyes. It is legal ammunition and a filed grievance on the records. You need to complain. To everyone. To all authorities. Campus authorities should be notified. Seriously. Get as much on file as possible.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:31 AM
2

Depends on the state.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 07:29 AM
6

I can see where you're coming from, but this is STILL a legitimate argument against feminism. It's just less an argument for men's rights.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:53 PM
1

Totally racist. Hilariously so.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 12:50 PM
1

http://pastebin.com/DaRn7cN7 Here's your link. You can start the discussion. I'm afraid I'm too much of an expected shithead to be taken seriously when discussing things around here.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 08:22 PM
30

Wasn't there an incident a few years back about a professional-level Magic: The Gathering player who ended up dating one of Jezebel's posters via OKCupid and she basically beta shamed him in an article?
/r/MensRights13/06/13 04:02 PM
1

No, I'm pretty sure this is native downvoting. Oh well! I'm not here for popularity contests, as it is anyways.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 12:14 PM
9

There shouldn't be so many downvotes. This is practically attempted murder via social methods. Bitch deserves to be shot.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 05:00 PM
2

The technique is sound. It just requires more dummy accounts, and doesn't even leave a trace of interference, since actual reply posting doesn't need to be done.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:58 PM
2

Isn't that -already- the case? Unattractive and interested? RAPIST! Unattractive and trying to bring up a point? WELL UR JUST SOME BUTTMAD VIRGIN SO YOU HAVE NO SAY HERE. Feminism has been marginalizing the voices of sexually unattractive and celibate men for a while.
/r/MensRights06/06/13 07:11 PM
8

Technique #1 - 'FORUM SLIDING' If a very sensitive posting of a critical nature has been posted on a forum - it can be quickly removed from public view by 'forum sliding.' In this technique a number of unrelated posts are quietly prepositioned on the forum and allowed to 'age.' Each of these misdirectional forum postings can then be called upon at will to trigger a 'forum slide.' The second requirement is that several fake accounts exist, which can be called upon, to ensure that this technique i…
/r/MensRights06/06/13 12:00 PM
5

All I want is my own hijab waifu ;-;
/r/MensRights05/06/13 04:32 PM
5

A: This is ridiculous. B: I have a hijab fetish, WHAT NOW?
/r/MensRights05/06/13 12:07 PM
-10

SRS troll go home. Take your alt with you.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 09:00 PM
2

OH NO, MUH FEELZ. God forbid someone has to use harsh words to make someone face a terrible reality.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 05:25 PM
0

My question to you then, is why you attack me in return by marginalizing my sexuality. You're doing the same.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 09:17 PM
1

SRS GO HOME ALREADY JESUS.
/r/MensRights03/06/13 08:44 PM
0

MUH FEELZ
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:09 PM
-1

So you're afraid of being beta shamed, is that it? Look, I understand that it is pretty distasteful. But there is no acceptable avenue to deal with this aside from stoically enduring it. And passivity does not work. It hasn't been working. Simply putting the ugliness out there won't work because the narrative is so starkly defined by one side. I sympathize with you. But I don't see any other way to deal with this aside from fighting fire with fire. Yes, it is an uphill battle. And I suppose as a…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 06:06 PM
1

We're talking about equality in retribution. This is simply people adapting to the change in landscape created by radical feminism. Surely you didn't think that men should just stay stoic, quiet, and endure it. Why should they? For the sake of women that don't want men to do that anyways, but punish them if they don't?
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:41 PM
0

Eye for an eye. If it is acceptable for someone to sexually marginalize another because their gender has sexual power and agency, and another gender is being accused of using physical force to marginalize others and that's no longer accepted, why is sexual marginalization suddenly off-limits? I mean, if you'd rather that I actually hit feminists, that's cool and all, because I'm stronger than them due to biology, but we both know that's not happening. So I'll just beta shame them to suicide. Tha…
/r/MensRights03/06/13 05:23 PM
0

Nice creep shaming. Relationships are about reciprocity.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:09 AM
0

I reserve the right to slut shame, then. Since we're back to "Key and Lock" dynamics here.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:56 PM
1

Yeah, might as well say "I'm a huge beta, ignore me." Not every guy is going to make a good first impression. Some guys are ugly or fat. Not every guy has feelings for a girl when he meets her. Is it that bad to try and prove that you're a good person and that you might be worth someone's time as a romantic prospect? Are you going to say that anyone who suddenly realized they had feelings for someone they were close with are retroactively manipulators? You skew the game in favor of hotties, and …
/r/MensRights31/05/13 11:48 PM
7

STOP TIPTOEING. Seriously. Just stop. Be yourself. Say what you want. If women want to shame you for it? Great, go ahead. They only prove that oppression and patriarchy is self-enforced if they resort to the usual argument strategy, which is the sexual marginalization of people they disagree with.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 10:48 PM
0

I think one of the biggest things here that isn't said as explicitly as it should be is that in the traditional Japanese household, the wife manages the house's finances. “Handing over all of your earnings to the household and being given ‘pocket money’ by the wife leaves me muttering ‘You’ve got to be kidding!’” (28, Medical care, welfare-service). The men aren't just expected to be breadwinners supporting housewives and a family, they're expected to accept an ALLOWANCE from their wives, and to…
/r/MensRights25/05/13 04:55 AM
5

Yes, because men must be emotionless kill-and-workbots who provide protection and money and shelter but never feel anything and god forbid your children recognize that you are human with emotions, and understand that the world is full of terrible, hurtful things, and that words hurt people.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 04:34 AM
-2

This would be great if guys who didn't act like this weren't shamed by both genders for being huge, asexual fags.
/r/MensRights17/05/13 01:03 AM
1

Interestingly enough, dividing obesity by race seems to indicate that people of white, nonhispanic descent have obesity rates much closer to that of the more overweight countries in Europe, such as Germany. America's obesity epidemic mostly expresses itself in minorities. Which lends credence to at least some arguments of a genetic basis. But of course, Reddit is white as fuck, so I guess that's overlooked, usually. Editing in some of the resources I used to eyeball this. World rates: http://en.…
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:07 PM
1

Except it could be. The white populations of the US are not representative of all areas of Europe. Additionally, you are ruling out additional viable explanations such as epigenetic/disease-based explanations for the difference in obesity.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 12:27 PM
23

oh no. Oh no no no. So you're saying I'm a FEELINGS rapist?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 11:50 AM
15

Are you going to deny decades of brain studies? Women tend towards more average, less compartmentalized intelligence. Men tend towards specialization, and have more variance in raw intelligence measures. If you want a proposed mechanism divorced from selection pressures, which I am going to assume you are going to huff about, you could always point towards the fact that girls have chromosomal backup on their sex chromosome, while men don't, which causes more unpredictable results(see: sex-linked…
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:54 AM
2

This is some Hate and Basketball shit here.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:24 AM
2

Because she isn't as physically capable. Women just aren't as physically capable as men, nine times out of ten. It's just how it is. Let's not kid ourselves here. Distrust over capability doesn't just happen to women. As an obviously un-fit man, I have been challenged at several job interviews to 'prove' my physical fitness by lifting loads. And these were for laboratory positions where there was a 40 lb lifting expectation like in an office environment. I know and live with firefighters, and th…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 04:14 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter