| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Q4All: How do we fix this mess?First, you're presupposing this is even possible in the first place and as I explained before it isn't. I didn't respond to the criticisms about practicality, because I wanted to focus on the 'theory'. Actually if we do economic analysis on a utilitarian basis, the equilibrium has to be for overall satisfaction, not specifically sexual satisfaction I never studied economics formally, but simple logic would say that if overall satisfaction can be calculated, and sexual satisfaction is a required … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/17 09:05 AM |
| 1 | Q4All: How do we fix this mess?Even the classic rape fantasy is part of this - its a fantasy of having a specific kind of power over the rapist (specifically, he will do anything to have you). So in this fantasy, while getting raped, you think the woman would be thinking, 'I can't believe he's risking years in prison for me, I must be really hot (or valuable),'? I could see it being something she thinks to herself after the fact, or since this is a fantasy, before she fantasizes about it. But during? I don't think that's what… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 17/05/17 06:03 AM |
| 1 | Q4All: How do we fix this mess?You're completely misunderstanding female desire. It doesn't come from submissiveness or inferiority - quite the opposite actually. >Women's desire for "better men" is actually because of their own supreme conviction in having an innate value simply because they're a woman. In addition, like I explained before, the female power fantasy is about having the ability to have power over a powerful man Sounds like rationalizing after the fact. Sex is asymmetric. My opinion is that the asymmetry is a b… | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/17 11:31 PM |
| 1 | Q4All: How do we fix this mess?Females being unable to exercise hypergamy does produce dissatisfaction in women and it also produces, to some degree, dissatisfaction in beta males because said males will not feel desired/desirable. Women would not have experienced being with an alpha, so the dissatisfaction will be limited to imagination. Religion also has many ways of widening the power deferential between a beta and his wife, which is a key component in generating sexual desire. The notion of a wife being submissive to her … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/17 03:38 AM |
| 1 | Don't like the SMP today? You wouldn't have liked it in the past...What I described is, indeed, fantastical, but only in degree. I wanted to illustrate a consequence of a free market SMP that people might not immediately be aware of. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 16/05/17 01:00 AM |
| 1 | Don't like the SMP today? You wouldn't have liked it in the past...Ok, lets go a little more drastic (and hypothetical). Let's say that every woman in your town only has sex with one of the men in the town. So, just one huge polygamous relationship between every women and one man. It's all fully consensual, so it doesn't violate the rules of our liberal SMP. Would you be OK with this situation since everything is consensual? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/17 11:36 PM |
| 2 | Q4All: How do we fix this mess?She? You're a cheeky one huh? But yes, he doesn't exist, but so what? Life is boring without games to play. Religion is a good one. If you get enough points, you go to heaven! You should try it. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/17 11:15 PM |
| 1 | Don't like the SMP today? You wouldn't have liked it in the past...This is why I particularly object to slut shaming, as it is a hangover from that old world, and its dated and completely irrational notions of propriety and self-denial. Lets say there's a decent looking prostitute or just a promiscuous woman in your town and she keeps even just two men romantically (or sexually) occupied. The consequence of that would be that some other woman in your town will not be able to find a guy. Is that OK with you? | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/17 11:02 PM |
| 6 | Don't like the SMP today? You wouldn't have liked it in the past...Yes they do. There are (about) equal amounts of men and women in society. If each man can only have one woman (his wife), by the pigeon hole principle, there exists a woman for every man. In a liberal sexual free market, on the other hand, where consent is the only regulation, if one man quickly goes through multiple women faster than those women go through men, or if one man takes two women at the same time, then some other man is left unable to find a woman. | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/17 10:52 PM |
| 2 | Q4All: How do we fix this mess?From a Pareto-Optimality perspective, the current situation is actually more Pareto-Optimal than forcing everyone into monogamous pair-bonding for life....if women are indeed willing to cheat in order to have Chad dick....well, Kaldor-Hicks isn't really satisfied. In other words, you think females being unable to exercise hypergamy produces the same level of dissatisfaction that male celibacy would? You should take into account that in our evolutionary past, betas could band together and murder … | /r/PurplePillDebate | 15/05/17 10:04 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter