TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

instagata0 Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by instagata0 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

Well... I mean, obviously the courts define how the word 'disadvantaged' should be interpreted when it's written in the black-letter law. Insofar as statutory interpretation is concerned, that is their entire job. But that's neither here nor there, because this particular law serves only to ensure that other laws aimed at ameliorating discrimination are not interfered with. The CEO is not creating any law which could fall under the authority of this statute, and nor would she have the power to d…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 01:18 AM
11

But that isn't in the words... It's just saying that the Charter doesn't interfere with any existing affirmative action programs or protective laws. It doesn't apply here because there are no programs in place to allow her behaviour, and she's wrong about there being protective laws.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:47 AM
20

"(2) Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability." I'm not in any Canadian jurisdiction, but I don't see how this applies at all.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 12:37 AM
23

Degree in psych here. A lot of people are inclined to have thoughts along these lines. It's more common than I thought for people to think that this sort of punishment can be healthy when used in the right context. Unfortunately the intuition of people such as yourself has been shown to be wrong. Children who are disciplined this way do tend to 'behave' better when there's a supervisor around, so what you say is true. However, there are a number of detriments that make the punishment unsuitable.…
/r/MensRights02/11/11 10:15 AM
1

Thanks. I'm really sorry that that happened to you, and I think it's awful. Nothing justifies rape, and I feel like an implicit understanding of that fact should be absolutely clear. When it all comes down to fundamentals, all I was trying to get across was the fact that there's a lot of instances in which "no means no" is not an effective campaign, because sometimes rapists don't understand that they're being told "no". I don't support rape in any context. Thanks for your comment. There's a lot…
/r/MensRights31/10/11 02:40 AM
-4

I'm quite sure that what he meant to convey was that people went ahead and called me a rapist. There is no doubt that the scenario that I described was rape, and there is nobody who is not against rape.
/r/MensRights30/10/11 11:53 PM
-9

I've never suggested anything to the contrary of this. I've said that the idea of telling people that "no means no" isn't stopping people from doing these things because they don't realise that it is rape. I'm not saying that it makes the rape any better, I'm just explaining why this type of thing doesn't work. Furthermore, I go on to say that it's degrading to make people sign their name to say that they aren't rapists, because it's an accusatory move. You automatically view people who refuse t…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 04:35 AM
1

I'm sorry? I wasn't trying to offend you, I was just explaining my position. I've never taken a drunk girl home to have sex with her, either. The fact that I lack personal experience in the things that I've spoken about doesn't mean that I lack the empathetic intelligence to speak about them.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 02:32 AM
0

I've never been in a situation where I've loved a girl who didn't love me back, and so I can't comment from personal experience, but I've always felt as though I'm in the minority on that. Plenty of male and female friends of mine have been in those situations, and as far as I can tell, it happens equally often to both genders. We live in a world where being forward with that type of thing complicates interaction, and so it happens incredibly frequently.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 02:09 AM
-2

Thanks for that reassurance. I was really confused by that, and thought I must have forgotten about some comments I made on a really bad day, or something, and these people had managed to find it in my history...
/r/MensRights29/10/11 02:05 AM
-3

Is this directed at me? To clarify, I've never been in any of the situations I've described. I was just offering up a plausible hypothetical scenario that I thought people might be able to understand. In case there's any doubt - I've never come close to raping anybody in any context, including the one I described. I was just opening up a rather closed discussion. With that said, I disagree with your last sentence. Plenty of people would like to be in a relationship with a friend, and there's not…
/r/MensRights29/10/11 01:40 AM
-14

This was in f7u12. I thought people would be mature enough to have a proper discussion.
/r/MensRights29/10/11 01:05 AM
-3

Here's the rest of that thread where fewer people were like that. Edit: For the record, I have no idea what those people were referring to when they said they'd been through my comment history. You guys are welcome to check it to see if you can find something that has made me look like a rapist, but I'm quite sure that the huge majority of my posts are sensibly written and respectful.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:58 PM
2

Yes, I agree with this. I think it highlights a problem in all criminal law which is the inherent trade-off of having a publicly open system. On one hand, people should have the right to witness the operations of a fair and just court. On the other, those accused should have the right to privacy to protect those who are innocent from backlash following a verdict. It is a fierce battle between the two opposing sides, however the way that it currently works is not fair. The accused always loses.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 12:47 PM
1

This is clearly sarcastic, but I'm genuinely having a difficult time understanding why you thought it was a necessary comment... Obviously if a person is accused of rape, it's something that needs to be addressed, and this is clearly a complex task... ... I don't mean to be disrespectful, I just genuinely don't understand what your position is.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 10:27 AM
6

I am by no means suggesting that rape laws (or any other laws) are perfect. Creating stupid reactionary laws like the one proposed here is no solution to that. Bad laws should be fixed, and good laws should be created. Stacking on new bad laws is not helpful.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 06:02 AM
9

I'll stick my thoughts into the firing line here. I disagree completely... Instances of false accusation are far too complex to lump into this sort of treatment. They're far too complex to even discern whether or not they should be a criminal charge. They should certainly be dealt with by the courts, but that's the extent to which we can make statements like these. Depending on the damage to a person's reputation and their future career and lifestyle prospects, these cases should be dealt with d…
/r/MensRights28/10/11 03:49 AM
7

Please. It is abundantly clear what you were saying. Stop even suggesting otherwise.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:42 PM
6

Your statement was that women are easily manipulated by other people, even when what those people say is incorrect. Your insinuation was that women are less capable of making an emotionally balanced decision. Your statement was correct, but by leaving out the fact that men are also easily manipulated, you insinuated something that is completely incorrect.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:29 PM
13

It's the feminist women too. Many people are in this subreddit because of the feminist women. We all know what damage the feminist women do to men, and the ways that they impact on the mentality of other women. This post is drawing attention to the often over-looked fact that feminist men are, in some cases, even more damaging than feminist women. The second paragraph of your post is ridiculous. We're all easily manipulated. Men are manipulated by women all the fucking time. Men are manipulated …
/r/MensRights28/09/11 02:00 PM
14

You've missed the point of the post. Feminists are a specific group of people. She's not mad at men for enabling women to be mad at men, she's mad at feminist men for perpetuating the idea that it's okay to be mad at all men for stupid made-up reasons.
/r/MensRights28/09/11 01:42 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter