TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

intirb Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by intirb on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

From the original article, in JAMA: Men accounted for 90.8% of all cases of primary and secondary syphilis in 2014 Why not test both men and women more often anyway? Again, from the article: Although direct evidence on screening among nonpregnant persons who are not at increased risk for syphilis infection is lacking, based on the established test performance characteristics of current screening tests and the low prevalence rate of syphilis in this population, the yield of screening is likely lo…
/r/MensRights09/06/16 03:55 AM
2

I mean, it's like telling people not to drive a car rather than teaching them not to crash. Maybe it's more effective in preventing car crashes, but it also prevents people from living a normal life.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:30 PM
1

But.. the data from OP showed that less than 25% of sexual assaults with female victims happen from strangers, and less than 20% of them happen in public. The data doesn't tell us what time of day those sexual assaults happen, but presumably less than all of them happened at night. So telling a person not to be walking the streets at night is probably not the most effective advice for someone looking to avoid being raped. Additionally, I don't feel like we should be encouraging people to be shut…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:56 PM
0

I would say that not only are men more likely to open themselves to the possibility of violence, they are much less likely to report it. Citation needed. As a man, I face the Spector of violence a lot I think the data show that both men and women, sadly, face the specter of violence a lot. Like I said before, from the data we're given, there doesn't seem to be much of a difference between physical attacks on women and physical attacks on men.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 01:45 PM
0

The report OP released also shows that about 75% of homicide victims are male, similar to yours. But we're talking about generally being attacked, which means both physical assault and homicide. So let's look at the numbers OP gave us (nothing wrong with your study, but it just doesn't give physical assault numbers). In 2008, about 1500 physical assaults were reported per 100000 people, roughly split between male and female victims. There are more than 20 million adults in Canada, so about 300,0…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:33 AM
1

I think you prove that a taboo exists with data. All I'm saying is that I'd like to have enough data to make a sound conclusion. Edit: and along the same lines, the statistics OP posted seem to show that men and women are physically assaulted at roughly equal rates. Certainly, the rates are not "orders of magnitude" different.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:07 AM
11

So I frequently use similar statistics in a women-empowering way, to try to convince young women that the world isn't quite as scary as they're told etc. The response I usually get is that men are attacked more on the street because they're more likely to be out on the street alone in the first place. Just from a statistical point of view, without knowing how many men or women are on the streets alone in general, it's hard to make statistical comparisons for whether it's safer for a woman or a m…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:39 AM
3

I'm not sure blackmail generally justifies the use of force. I think the general rule is to use just enough force to protect yourself (possibly others) from direct physical harm, and no more.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 04:28 AM
6

Right, which is why I think avoiding arguments about labels and focusing on issues is so important. If you start out attacking feminism, she's just going to get defensive.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 04:15 PM
4

I'm not trying to get into a "who is worse" argument. OP asked for advice, and regardless of which subreddit you find more (dis)tasteful, I'm giving practical advice about how his girlfriend is likely to respond. If OP wants a gentle introduction to MRM for his girlfriend, this subreddit is not the place.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:38 PM
19

As a woman and a TwoX reader, here's my advice: move conversation past labels. People here and elsewhere get all up in arms when you call yourself a feminist, a men's rights activist, a [fill-in-the-blank]er, but most people just want the same thing - equality. So focus the conversation on that. a substantial number of feminists have come to the conclusion that women will never reach equality until they give up privilege in certain areas. I would have her start there. In particular, I think the …
/r/MensRights25/08/14 01:06 PM
2

On a related note, men do admit to using cannabis at higher rates than women, but only about 30-50% higher (and not 1000% higher, like the arrest rates show).
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:26 PM
1

Not necessarily. It's mathematically possible for the number of rapes to decrease drastically while the percentage of people having been raped does not. You just need to take into account that people can be raped more than once.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:22 AM
1

It's actually mathematically possible for the number of rapes to decrease drastically while the percentage of people having been raped does not. You just need to take into account that people can be raped more than once. I don't know the truth of it either way (we'd need to dig up more data than was provided in this article), but you're presenting a false choice here between "you're all liars" or "you didn't really do anything at all".
/r/MensRights21/08/14 03:21 AM
3

You can personally believe a fetus to have a right to life but recognize that it's a grey area where reasonable people can disagree.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 02:40 AM
11

Add to the first one: a child born (through no fault of its own) through deceit, raised either in a resentful marriage or by bitterly divorced parents. It's not right to do that to a kid.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 05:14 PM
-1

Feminism is based around the idea of privilege and the idea of patriarchy. If you believe that men have total control over society and are solely privileged in their day to day life, then any problems they have aren't your problem, because it's caused by the patriarchy and thus by other men. I don't care if you don't agree with patriarchy theory, but this is a rather unfair explanation of it. Feminists believe that men have a disproportionate (not total) amount of control over society and are pr…
/r/MensRights04/04/14 03:13 AM
3

We don't really know enough about the situation though. Maybe W had other offers..
/r/MensRights18/03/14 03:48 PM
2

Evolutionary explanations make nice stories and can help guide hypotheses, but in the end, you need actual evidence. Evopsych theories are not widely accepted in the medical or scientific field. And you could use those same evopsych theories to argue that "women are better at child-rearing" or "men are better at math". So should we stop fighting for men to have equal rights in custody battles, or for women to have equal access to engineering education?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 07:03 PM
5

Likely in Pakistan, advances in health care that make childbirth safer have not become widespread. Childbirth is extremely dangerous, which overwhelms the increase in mortality seen in men due to many factors, including dangerous work.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 06:59 PM
1

Where, worldwide?
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:25 PM
11

I've heard this from feminist professors in medical school, but I'm not buying it. How do we know it's biological? Just because the historical trend shows it? Maybe the life expectancy of men has historically been lower because, you know, men take on a disproportionate amount of the dangerous work (except childbirth, I suppose). Honestly, to me this is the same as saying "women are better at child-rearing" or "men are better at math" - it's not biological. If we're fighting for gender equality, …
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:21 PM
7

That's why I like to steer conversations away from labels. Honestly, the labels people choose for themselves only weakly correlate with their actual beliefs. I don't care if you call yourself a feminist or an MRA, but do you actually support equality under the law for both sexes?
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:15 PM
1

Then 30 minutes later; she grasped my left hand and turn my wrist to read the time. She did it nonchalantly and I later wondered what would have happened if I had done that to her instead. Perhaps I am over-thinking this. Perhaps I am just overly sensitive. I did feel that personal space was violated. Your personal space was definitely violated, and that was very unprofessional behavior. If she does it again, I would definitely recommend asking her to stop.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:44 AM
1

Yeah, and the margins on the survey are probably worse than +/- 6%
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:15 AM
5

Should Bechdel’s observation be used as a means by which to not only judge films, but potentially decide which films get made and which don’t? The answer is "obviously not". Anyone advocating otherwise just doesn't understand how the Bechdel test is meant to be used. The Bechdel test is meant to reveal overarching trends in film-making (or genres of films), not to condemn any particular movie. It's definitively not a problem if an individual movie fails to pass the Bechdel test. It's only a prob…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 01:55 AM
1

I mean, you can start a business in your garage, but even in software you need capital eventually. Look at how much money it took to take Facebook to an IPO, for example.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:06 AM
1

It's true that tech entrepreneurs don't necessarily have to deal with their industry peers, but they do have to raise capital and investment, which is also a male-dominated landscape.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 03:09 AM
2

Ugh. Amanda Marcotte. I'm sympathetic to a lot of feminist issues, but I cannot stand her. I skip over everything with her name on it. Her work is just awful.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:29 AM
1

Well, first of all, you're not an asshole for leaving a sexless marriage. No one should be expected to live their lives in celibacy because their spouse no longer wants sex. But depending on the variables in this particular example, you might be an asshole for giving up so easily and suddenly. If, for example, you are newly weds with no children - then yeah sure, just chalk it up to a mistake and leave. But if you've been married for years, you have children together, and this change in sexual a…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 12:16 PM
3

If you ever require more sex than a relationship yields, is your only recourse to politely ask for it without mention of your needs, and then pack your things if you don't get the desired answer? Personally, I would say yes - not just to sex, but also to anything you need from a relationship. The way relationships work: you state your needs (politely) and then give the other person room to accomodate them or not. If they aren't meeting your needs, you restate them, express how important they are…
/r/MensRights02/10/13 02:08 AM
13

The article also mentions that three quarters of men feel guilty or are uncomfortable letting a woman pay for all or part of the date.
/r/MensRights22/08/13 12:24 AM
1

I'm not sure I understand. What specific price?
/r/MensRights12/07/13 06:45 PM
13

If your female coworkers were talking about how much money you made in front of you, or asked you uncomfortable questions about your salary, and you expressed your discomfort and asked them to stop and they continued.. I would hope that HR would discipline them. This is certainly inappropriate behavior by most standards.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:31 PM
2

I agree, with the exception that the school could take reasonable actions to separate the two (accuser and accused) once a complaint has been filed, regardless of the verdict. For example, nothing wrong with letting the accuser or accused to voluntarily switch dorms or change classes, if s/he feels it to be necessary.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 08:43 PM
1

Yes, both men and women are capable of appreciating the beauty of attractive members of the other* gender. I'd say these people are pretty normal and healthy. We could argue about whether or not seeing ideal forms in magazines and advertising ultimately hurts our body image more than it brings us pleasure - but in general it's still normal to notice and admire an attractive person. And yes, some women and some men treat some members of the other* gender as objects only useful for sex and otherwi…
/r/MensRights28/04/13 11:00 PM
3

Yes - the suggestion was meant as a joke. Like how "reverse" sexism is really just sexism.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 10:29 PM
1

How about "reverse rape culture"? :P
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:23 PM
2

Interesting - I've never heard that before. Source? Anyway, other people may also be wrong - doesn't change my point. Edit: it seems that the Bureau of Justice Statistics includes threats of rape as "attempted rape", but separates attempted rape from completed rape. If you want to call this an "attempted false rape accusation," I guess that works too. As long as everyone is clear on how these definitions are being used.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:01 PM
81

To be fair, this isn't a false accusation. Just a threat of a false accusation. Not saying this behavior isn't absolutely reprehensible - because it absolutely is. I'm also not saying that false accusations don't happen - because they do. But this situation shouldn't get counted as a false accusation. It's more like blackmail - an especially unfair form of blackmail, that currently only has a much higher possibility of being successfully used against a man than against a woman.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 06:56 PM
1

What stigma?
/r/MensRights17/04/13 11:45 PM
2

Absolutely, I wasn't trying to argue against your main point. But you mentioned the gender of your boss, so I just want to note, more as an aside, that men aren't the only ones capable of being misogynist.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 01:44 AM
2

Alternatively, your female boss was a misogynist. Women can hate women, too. Edit: typo
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:21 AM
9

We need to actively recruit men into teaching, especially in the lower grades when this bias first occurs. We also desperately need to stop unfairly medicating these boys just because of societal biases about their "comportment". And finally, we need to educate teachers about their own biases so that they can actively correct for them, just like we do for STEM teachers and girls.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 12:02 AM
1

I agree with a lot of what you wrote, so I wanted to clarify what I meant before. If I were in an argument with someone or a group of people, and someone used the term "mansplaining" in order to diminish the value of someone's words, I'd be very upset. In my mind, no one's words are less valuable simply because of their gender, and using "mansplaining" in this way is exactly the same as saying "well you're just a woman." It's offensive. It's also an ad hominem fallacy. In OP's case, his friend a…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 06:09 PM
3

I hope it's clear I wasn't trying to imply that only male patients will benefit from male nurses. Everyone stands to benefit, as you point out.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 12:51 PM
1

There's no reason why this issue can't be handled in a gender-neutral manner. Sexualization and objectification affect both men and women - I'm sure both boys and girls could benefit from positive discussions about body image and self-confidence. Why does this have to be presented as if the teachers are somehow rescuing innocent girls from the evils of a recreational pole dancing class? Women have the freedom to express themselves sexually, and these teachers are the ones "[turning back] the gai…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:35 AM
4

I fully support this - a nurse is critically and intimately involved in patient care, and I imagine some male patients would feel more comfortable with male nurses. Plus, I believe there is a nursing shortage, so we should be recruiting from all potentially underutilized talent pools - which definitely includes men. Men have equal capacity to be nurses as women.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:20 AM
2

I think you're conflating talking about an offensive term with using it directly to offend someone. I'd be equally interested in hearing various minorities talk about what slurs mean to them. And bringing up the subject in the form of "what does the term mansplaining mean?" isn't the same as attacking men.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 08:21 PM
3

11-7000 bc there was a society divided largely by gender Do you remember the name or geographical location of this society?
/r/MensRights14/04/13 07:02 PM
0

Yeah, I get that. I tried poking around on what I thought might be relevant wikipedia pages, but I realize wikipedia isn't the ultimate authority on the past. I was just wondering if anyone had in mind any particular, say, books or time periods or historical examples that I could look into.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:39 PM
5

I'm kind of new to MRA, and I was trying to look into the facts of some of these things but I kept coming up short. Could you point me to sources or information on the following things: women were equal to us a long time ago when there was a lack of technology . women ... decided to take the easy way out . Instead of fighting and getting involved, women used their body to manipulate men into taking care of them and doing all of the hard work. I'd be very interested in reading/learning more. As a…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:09 PM
4

Maybe you said it, and she misunderstood. Or maybe you didn't say exactly what you meant to say, and she took your words the wrong way. It seems to me like this whole thing was a misunderstanding, and that your female friend that came to your defense really just made the issue worse. A simple "Oh, let me clarify. I'm sure you're very well-read and I was not trying to imply otherwise. I was simply saying that I have some unpublished work that I think you may find interesting, if you'd like to hea…
/r/MensRights14/04/13 05:30 PM
3

I'm not certain, but I think you can make a sexual proposition. If your subordinate coworker tells you to stop, or that you're making them feel uncomfortable, and you continue to make sexual propositions, then it becomes sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 03:04 AM
1

I do understand your point. Regardless of the particular idiosyncrasies in one's views, one must adhere to a certain set of beliefs in order to be called a member of that group. Otherwise, labels are meaningless. Where we disagree is the answer to "what core tenets of feminism are so sacred to the ideology that one cannot be considered a feminist if one does not believe them?" I would say primarily, if you do not believe that women should be given equal social, political, or economic rights to m…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:41 PM
1

There are a lot of hedging words there like "most," "often," and "typically," which leave open the possibility of being feminist and not subscribing to these theories. Edit: also, it doesn't say that these theories are a core part of feminism - just that many feminist groups believe the theories.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 05:11 PM
1

Patriarchy is a core part of feminism. According to whom?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:25 PM
1

Come on now, no need for personal attacks. I was just trying to point out something I didn't understand, in the hopes that you'd explain. You claimed that feminism suffers from the same kind of misunderstanding, but you never explained or supported such a claim. Would you care to? Edit: oh, and I missed this before, but to clarify: what, specifically, in the economic field do I need to have read to understand?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:42 PM
1

I suppose I'm missing the connections between taxes, slavery, and feminism.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:21 PM
1

Personally, I enjoy trying to understand the opposite side of view - not a straw-manned, stereotyped version of it, but the intelligent and nuanced one. I like to be able to argue it as well as someone who believed it. I think it's a good intellectual exercise. Now, I know you're just venting here, but I just wanted to reiterate: you asked for the feminist view (not mine), so I gave you the feminist view (not mine). That said, I'm not sure how one reads "economics". There are a lot of different …
/r/MensRights11/04/13 12:23 PM
1

Have you asked them why you were turned down and what you could do to improve your chances for next time?
/r/MensRights11/04/13 02:28 AM
1

I disagree. Just like one can be a Democrat without believing in every tenet or political aim of the party, or one can be a Christian without taking every word of the bible literally, I think someone can be a feminist without believing in patriarchy theory or other tenets of some brands of feminism. Feminism is a collection of movements and ideologies aimed at defining, establishing, and defending equal political, economic, and social rights for women. Under political movements you can see a div…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 02:19 AM
2

I wrote this on another thread, but I think the most generous (for feminism) definition of patriarchy is not "all men have power, no women have power," but "a few men had power over everybody (male and female)." Power was primarily wielded by men, but that doesn't mean all men wielded substantial power. These powerful men created institutions to ensure they could maintain their power. Sometimes that meant solidifying their power over women (institutionalized sexism), but it also meant creating i…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 02:05 AM
5

I think it depends on how you think about patriarchy. A lot of people hear patriarchy and think it means "all men have power, no women have power." Really what it means is that a few men had power over everybody (male and female). Power was primarily wielded by men, but that doesn't mean all men wielded substantial power. These powerful men created institutions to ensure they could maintain their power. Sometimes that meant solidifying their power over women (institutionalized sexism), but it al…
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:45 AM
1

I don't really know what the poster is doing - we don't have that information, and he deleted that old post. But the two commenters above us in this thread are talking about water-only diets: JUST water is a bad way to lose weight. and Your [sic] probably got a few vitamin and mineral deficiencies going on
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:30 AM
2

The key point there is they were given water and vitamins.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 01:21 AM
2

Yeah, I think there was something, and I just applied anyway.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:04 PM
9

I tried to apply for the selective service when I was 18 (I'm female), and I got some bullshit letter saying basically "here are all the court cases that say we can reject your application because you are a woman." I really hope this goes somewhere. Though I do think there could be some serious biological ramifications that we need to consider, ultimately it's absurd that women can't even join the selective service voluntarily, let alone that they aren't required. Edit: for clarity
/r/MensRights05/04/13 11:46 AM
1

That's very sad. Did you pursue legal action or report this to the cops?
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:54 AM
1

Sometimes there's some bit of truth, but sometimes there isn't. For example, there are stereotypes that men are more violent than women or that women take better care of their children. Personal anecdotes aren't enough - the way to distinguish fact from fiction is to submit hypotheses to empirical testing.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 12:44 AM
1

Some people recognize "girl" as the female equivalent to "guy", but many do not. Others say "gal" would be the correct, age-neutral equivalent to "guy".
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:09 PM
-3

I understand you aren't trying to make sweeping generalizations of all men and all women, but I still think you need sources if you're going to make any kind of statement like "women tend to do x, while men tend to do y". There are a lot of generalizations out there that are based more in stereotype than in fact.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter