TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

intriguingthing Archive

View 0 posts and 52 comments by intriguingthing on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 09:43 PM
-2

So you can't provide even one citation for your claim of "thorough debunking"? Great. That's your concession. Bye.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:15 PM
-1

Citation still needed. If you can't give me at least one citation, published in a peer-reviewed journal, of course, for your claim of "thorough discrediting", I will take that to be your concession.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:09 PM
-2

has been thoroughly discredited Citation needed.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:01 PM
1

It's on the wiki. You're lying. Regardless, I can give you a full bibliographic citation right now if you commit to conceding the argument upon receiving it.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:42 PM
-5

You have no data and I'm giving you data, you liar.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:16 PM
-1

How about the millions of women who've been victims of rape? This poster isn't about them. It's about false rape accusers. Focus. the few men who are victims of false accusations Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:36 PM
1

Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:35 PM
1

Real rape victims are not THAT girl. False rape accusers are.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:35 PM
-1

Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:34 PM
-8

The fact that they do so in epidemic numbers is a pretty good reason to think that they would do so.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:33 PM
-11

Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:30 PM
-1

And you lose by ad hominem. Bye.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:49 PM
-2

Irrelevant. The study isn't about the internet in any way whatsoever. Stop trying to derail. I will not allow it.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:40 PM
-2

The internet was around for around for more than a decade by the time this study was published.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 11:58 AM
-1

No, they're nowhere near close. There's very large variation. There are results across the entire range from 2% to 90%. Just look at the numbers. You haven't even looked at the numbers. Or you have, and you're lying about them. Either way, you lose.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:49 AM
-2

More lies and more slurs. Keep proving me right, bigot.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:14 AM
-2

I think it, because it is the case. You are a misandric bigot, and a member of a misandric hate group that also happens to hate a large number of other minorities besides men. You, personally, and your hate group, collectively, uses hundreds of bigoted slurs against minorities every day. You are a bigot, a hypocrite, and a hate group member.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 03:04 AM
0

By the same logic, since none of the other studies agree with any other studies on the topic, they all seem questionable. Just look at the numbers. They range all the way from 2% on the low end, to 90% on the high end.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:53 AM
-4

When you've been reduced to arguing that your ad hominem doesn't qualify as ad hominem, that's when you know you've really and truly lost. Oh, and you're a bigot and a hypocrite, in addition to having lost the argument. So you've got that going for you, which is nice.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:43 AM
0

If I were you, I'd link to an article when I was claiming to link to an article. Also, you just used an ableist slur and lost the argument by ad hominem. Thanks for playing.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 02:08 AM
0

You merely linked to the wiki page, not to any article.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:17 AM
-2

Citation needed on the discrediting.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:53 AM
-16

Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:12 AM
-6

That is complete bullshit. A false rape accuser is not a victim, they are the aggressor, and they are already too advantaged. You were to assume that the back and forth is already finished. You had one job. You failed at even that. You lose.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:35 PM
-6

You failed to provide a citation for your claim. You lose.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:31 PM
-4

Citation needed disproving the study's findings.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:29 PM
-7

You don't want justice for any male false rape allegation victim. You're a misandric piece of shit. Assume we go back and forth like this for as many times as it takes for you to accept that you're the misandric piece of shit that you are, because I'm not budging. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:27 PM
-4

You confirmed the study to exist. Its citations prove its existence. You're still lying. You're a waste of time.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:27 PM
-6

For you to deny male victims the justice they deserve simply means you're a misandric piece of shit.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:21 PM
-16

I gave you the citation. You confirmed it to be valid. Now you're contradicting what you said in your previous post. You're contradicting your own, personal validation. You lose.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:20 PM
-20

Consult with your library.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:11 PM
-6

prevented We're talking about punishment here. You literally never once mentioned punishment. You do not want false rape accusers punished, certainly not as consistently and as harshly as they deserve. You do not give a shit about their victims. You do not want them to receive justice. You are a misandric piece of shit.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 11:10 PM
-12

Stewart, C.H. (1981). "A Retrospective Survey of Alleged Sexual Assault Cases." Police Surgeon 28, 32.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:43 PM
-8

If you cared about male victims of false rape allegation, you wouldn't want their aggressors to get away unpunished. You're a misandric piece of shit, like I said.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:42 PM
-11

Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:19 PM
-17

Read the wiki on false rape accusations. Studies suggest as much as 90% of them are false. Edit: Good job on not brigading, SRS.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:19 PM
-14

The punishment, to the extent that it exists, is nowhere near how horrible the crime is, and how horrible its consequences are for the victims. Your refusal to acknowledge this is dishonest, unhelpful, and makes you look like the misandric piece of shit that you are.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:18 PM
3

Nobody has more privilege than a white female. Are you kidding me. They could literally murder a male and have the corpse imprisoned on false allegations of rape.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 03:12 PM
2

It's socially unacceptable to hit anyone initially. It's socially acceptable to hit everyone in self defense.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 01:33 AM
-1

Sorry, in all of those areas, world leaders are men. Women might form the majority of the workforce in certain areas, but that doesn't matter. That's just a result of institutional misandry.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/14 07:53 AM
0

I knew you'd ignore the evidence. Thanks for proving me right.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 10:56 PM
1

Yes, in fact, it is. SRS is a huge dataset confirming the hypothesis.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 10:23 PM
2

SRS!
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 10:21 PM
1

I'm good thanks.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 08:15 PM
1

Sorry guy, whatever your deal is, can't help you.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 07:38 PM
1

You must have posted in the wrong tab or something.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 06:51 PM
1

Nah. Female-produced porn barely sells. Females are the meat in porn, they're not the chef.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 06:05 PM
4

A female is exceedingly unlikely to be the best person for the job in any field. Name me one field where world champions/leaders are females.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 01:38 PM
14

Even at a tattoo parlor, where you might want the green hair and the face piercings, for example, you still wouldn't want the attitude and the entitlement.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 01:36 PM
14

Feminism is not a legally protected designation. It is 100% legal to not hire a feminist because she's a feminist. You can use a euphemism like them not fitting into the company's culture, if you like, but it doesn't matter, it's legal. Now, feminism is often indicative of psychological and mental disorders/disabilities, and those are legally protected designations, so make sure you're making or justifying your hiring decision properly.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 01:33 PM
8

Putting a price on sex creates (at least a beginning of) a fair market for sex. Absent an oligopoly of prostitution (which is difficult to establish, because it's not legal in most places, and pretty much any attractive female can enter the market with no money down) prices will eventually depreciate to sex's fair market value. This doesn't sit well with females, who want to maintain a seller's market with opaque pricing.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 11:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter