TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

invinciblequill Archive

View 5 posts and 46 comments by invinciblequill on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-4

you're literally doing the exact thing they're doing...
/r/MensRights03/07/21 10:52 AM
1

Can you give me more examples?
/r/MensRights12/06/21 08:36 AM
2

I've seen women on reddit pretend to be men/hide their gender altogether just to avoid creepy DMs or comments. I know it's significantly easier to get attention as woman on the internet, but not all women necessarily like it.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 08:33 AM
0

You didn't respond to my main point there, which was that false accusations happen for every crime, and tried to make a completely inapplicable comparison. First of all, I never said that false accusations shouldn't lead to prosecution. If there's significant evidence that there was a false accusation it should obviously lead to repercussions. What I'm saying is that it shouldn't be 25 years prison. To argue that, you need to show that a false accusation carries the same weight as forcing yourse…
/r/MensRights16/05/21 10:43 AM
0

I'm sorry but you're conflating rape victims with alleged criminals. And at the same time suggesting society would punish both equally I wasn't conflating anything with anything. I don't see how a victim and alleged criminal can be the same person, but if you're referring to me confusing false accusation cases with rape cases that are dropped, then as I clarified in my other comment, I wasn't. Also, you are suggesting that a rape victim cannot distinguish between someone in their circumstances a…
/r/MensRights16/05/21 10:28 AM
1

2012 cases out of 58856 recorded as rape prosecuted; that's 3.4%. In those cases, 1439 led to the conviction of the suspect for rape or another crime. I just think false accusations are simply not a big issue. It does draw great emotion when you read stories of men whose lives were ruined with a false conviction, but false convictions happen for every crime and you just have to accept it.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:58 PM
0

Yeah sure I think there should be some sort of punishment if it's actually proven in court, but if it should even lead to a prison sentence is debatable.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:39 PM
-2

No, I never said this was something gendered. In fact the OP did and I argued against that.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:31 PM
-1

It's logic. If for reporting rape there's a chance of you getting convicted for fraud and sentenced to 25 years, you're less likely to report rape.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:30 PM
0

Sure, but I made that as an additional point.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 03:29 PM
-7

Two things: Why use the words "women" and "men"? Are you implying that this should be a gendered punishment? That would just deter people from reporting rape or confessing to false accusation, which is what we exactly don't want. This is just an irrational reaction.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 03:10 PM
1

It is rape if she cannot consent. You seem to be suggesting the same verdict wouldn't have been given if the genders were reversed, a claim for which I demand a citation.
/r/MensRights09/05/21 10:31 AM
-18

complement*
/r/MensRights08/05/21 03:23 PM
1

I fail to see how that's my problem. I fail to see where I stated that it was your problem. So let me get this straight, the husband takes the responsibility for his wife's choice. If you wanna see it that way, go ahead. The way I see it is just certain guarantees for the financially weaker partner. Which is almost never the case because women date up. Where's your evidence for that? And again, it doesn't matter - the law cannot be adjusted for one gender or the other because that would obviousl…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 05:44 PM
1

Correction: If the high-income partner cheats on the low-income partner, the low-income partner will want to get a divorce and receive certain benefits via court. If the low-income partner cheats on the high-income partner and they get a divorce, the low-income partner still gets certain benefits via court. I don't see cheating having any effect here. The point was that cheating would render a man ineligible for benefits, when adultery never has that consequence and you've shown it yourself. It …
/r/MensRights07/05/21 05:25 PM
1

I don't give a DAMN, that's someone's personal choice and I don't find it morally acceptable to force another person to pay for someone else's personal choice. First of all, if women didn't bear children and someone (often the woman) didn't nurture them, the human race would go extinct. Secondly, these decisions are usually made in conjunction with their marital partners, so yes the partner can be held accountable where the court sees fit. Alimony isn't a compulsory thing in divorce. Majority of…
/r/MensRights07/05/21 06:36 AM
3

This is no white knight, labelling them so makes real white knights look good.
/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:31 PM
2

Alimony is BULLSHIT. If you make a choice to quit the job market, that's YOUR choice and you suffer the Consequences like an Adult. First of all, people don't quit the job market just because they want to, they do so because it's just an easier way of life if one parent stays home and the other earns the money. Parents can decide which one of them does the former or the latter or they might prefer to split duties. But the point is, in the modern world, the partner who relies on the other financi…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:29 PM
-4

A fact you've made up from your arse I presume?
/r/MensRights05/05/21 04:00 PM
1

Wth is wrong with you
/r/MensRights03/05/21 03:08 PM
3

Do you actually understand what they speak? Because an ad like that isn't good marketing.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 03:08 PM
3

I was going to say it was a joke based on an unrealistic scenario until I clicked the link you sent. You definitely have a point and I agree with you.
/r/MensRights03/05/21 03:03 PM
6

Where should they get the said resources then? From your arse?
/r/MensRights03/05/21 02:40 PM
7

Translation?
/r/MensRights03/05/21 01:02 PM
2

Feminists generally assume that men have all the advantages and they're living amazing lives while women are constantly oppressed. They fail to see the bigger picture. And I don't think it's right to argue that men have "free will" while women don't. It's not like Oh I'm male I can do whatever I want woohoo, you're expected to be the breadwinner of a household, which is arguably harder than managing the house. This is the point that the people here are trying to make because they're just obvious…
/r/MensRights05/04/21 03:28 PM
3

My issue with this poll is that the question for circumcision doesn't specify male or female.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 08:43 AM
-2

No it doesn't?
/r/MensRights26/03/21 08:16 PM
-4

???? I don't understand what's wrong with her tweet.
/r/MensRights26/03/21 07:36 PM
1

Already posted
/r/MensRights15/03/21 07:25 AM
36

To be honest, I don't like the way lots of people complain about feminism and its exclusion of males here. However, this is a case where they are right. I'd recommend you to look up Earl Silverman, who attempted to do the exact thing you're talking about. You'll understand the attitude of a lot of people here. Feminists will shut down any attempt at discussion or advocacy of male issues.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 06:29 PM
1

This is a good suggestion
/r/MensRights13/03/21 04:31 PM
1

Yes? Women's right to own property was granted in 1882. Women who owned sufficient property to vote were rare, but they did exist.
/r/MensRights28/02/21 03:00 PM
-3

Men who met the stated requirements were able to vote. Women who did weren't, not that there were a lot of women who did. The reason why it's celebrated as a great achievement for feminism is the suffrage movements that had been going on for decades.
/r/MensRights27/02/21 08:04 AM
1

The study has already been debunked by a Redditor who did their research in the comments section of that post.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 06:31 PM
-2

It's not the feminists disagreeing with the post, those are the people who moved over there from this post. If the post was seen by feminists before it got swiftly downvoted to oblivion I can guarantee you it would have a ton of feminists commenting "This is why we need feminism" there.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 06:09 PM
1

No I'm not a feminist apologist. And I do not wish to discuss any further. Get out.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 10:40 AM
9

That's why I left my comment deliberately vague on that. You could interpret it to mean that the terms assume either that the man is talking condescendingly in the first place or that they're intentionally being condescending towards them because they're female.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 08:03 PM
1

I'm not here to have a discussion about feminism or contemporary society, how many times do I have to say that? I've berated modern feminism countless times. The problem is, you lot are claiming women's second-class status in many aspects didn't exist in history. It did and that's a fact. Case closed.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 05:48 PM
50

I've said this for a long time, the terms "mansplaining" and "manterrupting" are fundamentally sexist because you're assuming the man is talking condescendingly to a woman just based on the fact that they're male. Patronising speech isn't a gendered issue.
/r/MensRights15/02/21 05:46 PM
1

That's a very extremist point of view. And again, do I have to repeat a million times? I think feminism is ridiculous and redundant today. It doesn't matter with this post, this is about history. You don't have to bring feminazis up.
/r/MensRights13/02/21 04:16 PM
1

I don't have a feminist view at all. You lot are just deluded, acting like feminism is a century long attempt to exterminate males from society. Honestly some of the comments on this post just goes to show why some people hate MRAs.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 11:24 PM
0

??? What are you playing at? That's a ridiculous statement. Also, not sure how true that DV stat is, but quite frankly I don't care because this is a post about the past not the present.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 11:22 PM
1

Your source? CDC stats suggest many more women are raped over a life time than men.
/r/MensRights12/02/21 11:20 PM
-5

Ah yes I agree historical evidence is definitely revisionist history. To make this statement is ridiculous! Shades of a Christian declaring "Someone's buying into the theory of evolution".
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:15 PM
1

This is a fair point but it fails to highlight that men who worked dangerous jobs were willing to work the dangerous jobs whereas women simply couldn't due to physical constraints. If you're referring to the world wars where participation was compulsory, you do have a point but it should be mentioned that it originated from two ideas: first, as you say, the idea that women should be in a special position outside the dangers of war and second: that women were significantly weaker and less physica…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:10 PM
-1

The problem with your thinking is that I never said females were victims nor described their situation as perpetual. I'm just saying it can't be denied that men were definitely in a better position. Just think about having to act like men have the word over you, staying at home attending to inferior jobs to what men could achieve outside it. There's a reason why there's a significant lack of famous women in the past. This is also literally reflected in many historical pieces such as plays, books…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 12:04 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter