TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

inyouraeroplane Archive

View 2 posts and 230 comments by inyouraeroplane on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

$20/k year on groceries, clothes, and whatever additional rent you might need for a child? Plus, nobody's entitled to go to private schools if they can't afford it. This is why we have public schools and charter schools.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:55 PM
1

Are we leaving children with a parent with no income that often?
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:53 PM
1

T'was sarcasm.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:51 PM
2

And that's the rub. Everyone knows it. The best strategy is to find a rich guy, have a baby, then divorce and live off the child support because "think of the children". That's why there's no accountability. It's robbing Peter to pay Paula, and only shifts poverty around rather than solving it.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 08:01 AM
1

That's a reasonable policy in a world where a lot of people have HD video cameras in their pockets.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:54 AM
1

In that case, it sounds more like he's punishing you for disobeying him telling you no, rather than for stealing. It sounds like she just didn't ring it up, so that's on her. Your dad made you put it back so nobody would get in trouble for theft/forgetting to charge customers for merchandise.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 07:45 AM
2

Childbirth is like pooping out a watermelon while you pull your eyelid to the top of your head. That's why I did it twice.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:54 AM
1

And if guys do complain about something negative being said about them, even if it's a blanket accusation of being rapists and murderers, they're whiny neckbeards with tiny dicks who can't get any so they feel entitled to rape m'ladies just like their prophet St. Elliot of Santa Barbara.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:41 AM
1

So then all you have to do is make sure the kid isn't starving or naked and has a roof with a job you hopefully have and then you get whatever's left for yourself. Although, if someone is in such dire poverty, I don't know why they wouldn't give the other parent who has the ability to pay child support custody instead. Parents who can barely provide for themselves are way more likely to abuse the children they care for, probably due to the stress of being on the edge of survival.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:15 AM
1

That would matter if there were any sort of accountability to that money. It's totally possible to spend that $364/month on a lease for a pretty nice car and have not a single penny go to the child, and absolutely nothing would happen to someone who did that, as long as they made sure the kid wasn't starving and had decent clothing. Their child support wouldn't get cut, the payer wouldn't be excused for paying, the payee wouldn't have to give back the money, the payee doesn't even have to pay ta…
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:10 AM
3

If her only marketable skill was "nice body" (and maybe not even that, considering it's Donald Trump we're talking about) or "making a rich guy feel good", then maybe she should think before she has a kid or divorces someone who will always earn way more than she will.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:40 AM
1

The thing is, the kid never actually gets a cent of child support. Because they're minors (by definition), their legal guardian gets all the money and decides how to spend it. If mommy decides to use the money on plastic surgery or a trip to the Spanish Riviera with her new boyfriend and it does end up that the kid has to ride the bus and eat/wear cheap crap, the kid's SOL.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:37 AM
2

Even if you sent them to the best private schools, you'd still have like $80k/yr sitting around. Going to Harvard doesn't cost that much, so even a college fund would have money left over.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:32 AM
6

Well, maybe you lose out on your great lifestyle when you decide you can't deal with the person giving it to you. If you're going to bite the hand that feeds you like that and can't make that much money yourself, maybe you should think twice before you 1)get married, 2)have children, or 3) get divorced. Of course, we all know child support isn't really about best interest of the child, it's lifestyle insurance.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 05:18 AM
2

I think there is a double standard. Woman says "Why are all the good men dead, gay, or taken?" and the feminist peanut gallery responds "Cheer up. You'll find some one. A good man is hard to find." Man says "Why is it so hard to find a woman and get in a good relationship?" and people call him a "nice guy" loser who thinks he's entitled to love/sex from any woman he likes.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:06 PM
1

Do you think rapists actually care about consent? It's not like you ever hear someone say "Well, I was going to, but then someone for the first time in my life told me that rape is wrong, so I decided not to." For the same reasons car thieves don't care that stealing is wrong, rapists don't care that rape is wrong.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:56 PM
2

That or at least acknowledging men's problems without having to find a way to blame men for it because Patriarchy.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:13 PM
2

It's the same ethical difference between having an abortion because you don't want a child right now and deciding that your 6 year-old is inconvenient and slitting his throat.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:10 PM
1

Possibly not. Some rape laws say someone commits rape only if they penetrate someone with their penis without the consent of the other person. Using something besides a penis to penetrate or forcing someone to penetrate you are other, not as severely sentenced, crimes.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 10:38 PM
-2

Now, whether or not Cera acts beta in real life is arguable, mainly because we don't know him personally. I've seen him give interviews on talk shows and it's only slightly less awkward. He'll always be the adorkable guy in every role. thinks I'm this huge asshole to girls. You kind of are. Is that not the point of negging? Your sexism and homophobia don't help. PUA material is gay, because you wouldn't talk to a dude like that. I don't get PUA shit. I thought this place was a less extreme form …
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 07:57 PM
-2

We did hug on a second (so far the last) date, but that homecoming trip was without touching.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 03:58 PM
-2

Getting labeled a creep or clingy. That's the deal. It's a simple friendzone thing. She sees me as a friend, only, even though we went to homecoming together, and people don't generally hug or kiss their friends. You don't normally do that with other male friends and she also has to think about giving me wrong signals that might imply she wants sex when she doesn't.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 03:29 PM
2

I don't see how the tacit fact that a guy has quite a lot of money would paper over fundamental character flaws/hangups. George Michael Bluth doesn't become any more masculine/aggressive because he moves up from the banana stand to the company boardroom. If you don't like him, you don't like him.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 03:26 PM
-2

I would have gone in for a hug, but I know enough about how that can go to not chance it.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 02:04 PM
2

Don't even go to SRSWomen, unless you need to shake in anger and feel like vomiting. I read this whole thread about why men are actually less fit than women for combat duty because testicles are more easily damaged/more crippling when they get hurt than anything women have external and because since the Scout on TF2 is tiny and kind of frail but agile, that must work for real life. They say that there are no biologically selected mental things that men or women are better at, but then use someon…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:01 PM
1

I agree with the problem in part, CV disease is preventable and totally should be treated. What I don't like is that it only becomes worthy of advertising on Diet Coke cans and national department stores because it's affecting women.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 01:55 PM
1

It's just a really weird time because I know an equal number of women with crushes on androgynous men like Michael Cera or Sufjan Stevens or Conor Oberst, to say nothing of the Bieber worshp of 12 year olds, and women into men's men like George Clooney or The Rock Johnson. Even the women supposedly into said androgynous guys do not like any androgynous guys in real life. It's perhaps a fantasy for them, maybe like a gay best friend, but one they could boink if the situation required.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 01:53 PM
2

Yeah, I can even see it in my dad. He was always kind of betaish in his life, and he said so, but my mom has said things like "I wouldn't have married him if he couldn't have cooked." or using the fact that she has a doctorate and he has only a 4-year degree to her advantage that would absolutely not be tolerated if they were said by men about their wives. Honestly, that was what set off alarm bells in my head. She totally used him because 1) he had a stable, high paying job as a defense contrac…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 01:45 PM
1

Well, we can either have the colonizing forces destroy us or we can have some pleasure in our misery.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/13 08:20 AM
2

The whole idea that we need a women's psychology department just seems like crap. It implies women are so different and unlike men that they have to be treated as almost another species. It really comes off like that late 19th century "Women are hysterical because of their ovaries and need a good dicking every once in a while to maintain any semblance of sanity," pseudoscience that we now look at with disgust. Are there some differences, sure, but you wouldn't know that men and women are both hu…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:55 AM
5

Can't prove any correlation? Well, a lot of rapes/domestic abuse don't go reported, so it's happening anyway.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:37 AM
1

Getting in my car to go to work is a real Schrodinger's Get in a 60 mph head-on collision and splatter my guts across the windshield. Better not get near a car.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:28 AM
1

Men are literally never afraid to get attacked unless they're in a war zone, this article said so. Being a man means never ever being worried to walk alone at night or in an unfamiliar location because male privilege means nobody's going to try mugging you. I guess that's why I feel uncomfortable when people approach me, especially late at night or when they want money, especially if I think they could probably beat me in a fight, especially since I don't know who has a weapon. Ultimately, it's …
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:26 AM
1

The only way I can see this being a valid response is if she's saying that your need for conversation doesn't override anyone's right to safety. I generally don't talk to anyone, male or female, in situations like this, partially because of things like this. I hope and think that most feminists don't assume every man's a rapist in every situation until proven otherwise, although a few commenters in there clearly showed they do, but what they do feel uneasy about is the fact that men approach the…
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:14 AM
4

"A male officer responded to the call and put his hands on me to arrest me without my consent. I was raped, no technically about it."
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:08 AM
9

Rape is a terrible, horrible thing that isn't even appropriate to joke about, but it just doesn't compare to disappointment that you didn't get a conviction.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 04:05 AM
2

Cause, I don't know, people getting heart disease sucks and you wouldn't want your mother or sisters to have it and not know about it. This is why SRS hates us.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 03:56 AM
2

Women with heart disease have been ignored for a long time. I don't think anyone should die of heart disease, so on that end I'm OK with this thing existing. Yeah, the title catches me as kind of sexist, why not just "Go Red for Heart Disease Research"? Would women stop caring that people are dying of heart disease because men are involved?
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:18 AM
1

It kind of is.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 02:10 AM
2

Whooosh.
/r/MensRights06/10/11 12:28 AM
6

Yay. This is good news! Finally, women are winning! It's a shame so many boys can laze through school and keep getting degrees.
/r/MensRights05/10/11 10:47 PM
2

They really should just rename themselves "ShitIDontAgreeWith" or "PCPolice"
/r/MensRights05/10/11 10:42 PM
1

Sometimes I wish there was a man card system so we could destroy this guy's. "Even when you're losing, boys, you're winning."
/r/MensRights05/10/11 10:38 PM
0

He did not say Nazi, but he did say this was a genocide.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 02:03 PM
-1

Do you really not see a problem with comparing several unfair stereotypes and disadvantages with systematic murder of millions of people? The feminists aren't murdering people and this is a Godwin despite how he steps around it. Just being aware you sound like you need a tinfoil hat doesn't mean you don't need one. I'll be nice and not post this to SRS.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:36 AM
-1

Maybe if we did SRS wouldn't get in here so much. (Nahh, just kidding. They need something to complain about)
/r/MensRights30/09/11 05:27 AM
-6

This guy's crazy. Certainly men get put down, but comparing this to genocide, especially the Holocaust, is out of line. This is why the rest of Reddit hates us, because of conspiracy weirdos with unresolved castration anxiety like the writer of this article.
/r/MensRights30/09/11 04:30 AM
2

And it's not like there are any obese or scrawny people in software development.
/r/MensRights18/09/11 08:27 PM
1

Do credits usually say "Anna Stevens wrote lines 1027 to 2956"? How would they know it was you who wrote that part?
/r/MensRights18/09/11 08:24 PM
2

That solves nothing and is basically what the feminists are saying. People see men as the instigators of sex.
/r/MensRights15/08/11 05:07 PM
1

Good. Let the feminists walk their talk of equality or shy away and be proven misandrist.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 11:01 PM
1

They even have to go to another doctor regularly that men don't. Gynecology and obstetrics are covered under any health plan you could think of.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 10:57 PM
1

I never got the whole "Women get paid 80% of what a man does for exactly the same amount of time." argument. Then how come they don't hire mostly women and cut their operating expenses? Could it be that women are given maternity leave and are more likely to put their family ahead of their career and miss work due to menstrual pains? Nope, just plain ol' sexism.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 05:40 PM
2

I agree, but this guy gets mad about everything. He's kind of an asshole.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 05:22 PM
6

We're making progress. I'm kind of sad that they were pulled mostly for making women look like frail, hormonal, demons and not for making it seem like a man has to apologize or accept "Not reading between the right lines" or "Listening to what a woman says and not what she means". These ads demeaned both sexes. Women got "bitches be crazy". Men got their common "toadying gelding-of-a-man who's too clueless to function" role.
/r/MensRights23/07/11 05:15 PM
5

Wow, this is probably the time that "Feminazi" is called for. Living in different cities? Extermination? Castration? These are all out of the minds of the most evil tyrants imagined. What man was stupid enough to give her a child? No offense to you, but don't stick your dick in psychotic still applies.
/r/MensRights18/07/11 09:46 PM
2

Now when they start physically attacking you or persistently tell you these things, your rights are being violated. One question in an elevator followed by silence is not abuse or harassment.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:29 AM
1

"Anything that I disagree with or that works against me that happens to involve a man, regardless of if this is institutionalized, illogical, or takes into account the natural differences between male and female humans"?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:19 AM
1

Who defines this? We need an operational definition of such a vague subject that feminists can't appropriate for their own ends or against us.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:17 AM
1

You don't go into a belief system that stresses the rights of women as the most important goal and highlights their oppression and then say men face worse problems.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:15 AM
2

She's naming all these desserts and fruits, but all I see are these numerous yogurt cups with the exact same words she's saying and a picture of the real food on them. How can I, a mentally able adult, possibly connect the two?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:13 AM
1

Oh my God, Toddlers in Tiaras. That is wrong. That whole thing is wrong. Women talk about "not making women into objects to be judged like a piece of meat" then go and do this. Women talk about "young girls being oversexualized by the male media and made to feel inadequate in their bodies" when that's precisely what that show does. The whole "little girl beauty pageant" thing strikes me as socially-acceptable pedophilia.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:11 AM
2

Possibly being called to fight and die in a war you may not agree with because it's your civic duty while the other half will only get into that scenario of their own free will? Yeah, nothing compared to being paid 85% of what someone else does.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:07 AM
1

Oh, she does. Does she care? No.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:04 AM
2

"Is over" meaning "I won" or "People paid attention to me!"
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:02 AM
1

Or, maybe, she could possibly mean "If you're a man and a woman is talking, common courtesy dictates that you let her at least finish her sentence, then respond. You should also do the same for men, since it's just being polite." But this article did give off a faint misandrist vibe.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 02:01 AM
1

The trick to outarguing a woman is to think like a woman. Expect the unexpected. "What, so you're saying I don't love you? How dare you! I have dedicated myself to this relationship because I love you and you're just trying to make me look like a wishy-washy jerk." Your response?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:57 AM
2

It's sexist, but funny. A male writer won the Pulitzer Prize for a book where he wrote the part of a woman in Afghanistan and her oppression. An interviewer asked him "How do you write women so accurately?" He said, "I think of a man, then take away reason and accountability."
/r/MensRights15/07/11 01:53 AM
5

Thank you. Calling someone a rapist for asking you out for coffee once and dropping the subject as soon as you said no, even though it was 4 AM, is uncalled for.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:29 PM
1

Besides space exploration, the newest technologies always come from or rise to prominence because of sex. Examples: VHS won over Beta because Sony wouldn't sell porn studios their recorders. The Internet in general. Dildoes.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:25 PM
2

Yeah, when a man gets hit, he deserves it because he cheated on her or hurt her. Men just hit people for no good reason, even other men. I can't tell you how many times I've just been walking down the street and a man hit me or someone to assert his power because that's how civilized humans interact.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:24 PM
8

Proof that women don't care about equality, they just want power.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:22 PM
2

And what's the equivalent here? Buckle her vag shut? Yell about how you're a victim of being attractive to someone on the Internet for sympathy?
/r/MensRights06/07/11 06:32 PM
2

This was true even before the false potential rape accusations started going around.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:17 PM
0

Richard Dawkins thank God Dawkins God OH U!
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:16 PM
2

They're supposedly all about believing only what evidence supports, but somehow cling to this irrational belief that everyone with a penis is out to force it into you. How many times have you been in an elevator with a man and not been raped?
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:15 PM
3

Right, especially one where there's another man who, through our innate "brotherhood", we could convince to hold down while we rape the woman.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:13 PM
2

The first comment was a little out of line. Those are much, much worse, but that doesn't mean it's okay that people in America do get raped or beaten. Still, the fact that asking someone out for coffee is considered a rape attempt is pretty sad and we should definitely be against it and not label it "misogyny".
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:11 PM
1

Was this supposed to be in some poetic meter or something? I at first thought trochee or iambs.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:04 PM
2

He's not talking to me. OH MY GOD, HE'S GOING TO FOLLOW ME INTO THE PARKING LOT AND RAPE ME! (pepper spray and nut kick).
/r/MensRights06/07/11 05:02 PM
2

They never stop and give you the chance to get off! That's why they're so scary.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:59 PM
1

Man Getting Hit by Football
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:49 PM
1

And their downvote brigades for anyone who says they don't get to take away others' fertility. It's always wrong for someone to say "No, you can't get an abortion. I'm limiting your reproductive choice." but not wrong to say "Kick to the nuts, he spit on me! Bye bye, reproductive ability."
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:45 PM
1

If you went the "eye for an eye" path and either punched her in the ovaries or kicked her in the twat, you'd still be the asshole.
/r/MensRights06/07/11 04:38 PM
1

G-g-g-gay marriage!?!?! LE GASP!
/r/MensRights30/06/11 05:33 PM
2

It would soon turn into one. The people that care deeply enough about an issue are the only ones that post about them. I'm sure there are tons of Christians and atheists on Reddit, but the extremism of r/atheism is all anyone sees because it's a huge antitheist circlejerk.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 05:19 PM
0

Hell, even twoX would ban you for implying pregnancy is hard for the man. I think it's funny how many feminist sites ban all dissent.
/r/MensRights21/06/11 05:16 PM
3

Not sure if double entendre intended, or just good person.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 03:50 AM
4

No. That is the equivalent of reading Mein Kampf, often and in agreement, when you know your SO is Jewish.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:48 AM
8

Umm, no. Just like I wouldn't divorce my wife just for reading Feministing. Now, if she saw you reading something that advocated circumcising women, yeah, she would have a reason to leave. If you see her looking at S.C.U.M. it's GTFO time.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 12:48 AM
2

No, he was saying that position, like feminism, comes from ignorance. If you limit your knowledge to "I know feminists got women the vote" and "Feminists made domestic violence a concern of the police.", you're talking from the same amount of experience as someone who claims "Barack Obama was born in Kenya."
/r/MensRights11/06/11 08:43 PM
-2

Of course it is. We are legion, we are Anonymous. Expect us.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 08:12 PM
11

Hence, ladies' nights. They only cut the price to get women in the bar, to get men in the bar, to make more sex, so the men think "Hey, there are hot chicks here. I want to go back there!"
/r/MensRights11/06/11 08:10 PM
3

55%? More than that now, buddy. Try like 60%, but they still need those special colleges, because their intelligence isn't "nurtured enough".
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:24 AM
1

buying the right to have sex with you FTFY
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:16 AM
3

Like we said, this isn't an always/never proposition and it's disingenuous to suggest that it is. If a man and woman make a similar amount of money, they should pay a similar amount of the time, just like groups of platonic friends do.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:16 AM
1

They figure men don't necessarily mind paying cash if you can convince them you'll repay them in... other means.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:14 AM
2

"You want to know why men make more than women? To pay for dates and presents and keeping you interested!" -Louis CK
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:13 AM
1

Now, if it were written right in the URL, then yeah, we might think "I hate women" applies to everyone who goes there.
/r/MensRights05/06/11 05:01 AM
2

That'll teach you to be given privileges by society based on your skin color and sexual organs!
/r/MensRights05/06/11 04:57 AM
0

Is it sad that I kind of hope that if I have kids they're girls so they won't get unfairly labeled a rapist and be given extra opportunities for hiring and scholarships?
/r/MensRights03/06/11 11:20 PM
4

I'm starting to think that we're in for a sex war soon. When a man can be mutilated out of spite, and many average women will cheer the attacker on as a leader of equality and self-defense, it's obvious that one side resents the other.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 11:17 PM
1

inb4 "Just 'cause it's not forcible, doesn't mean it isn't rape."
/r/MensRights03/06/11 11:02 PM
3

She declined it though. Modesty is a virtue.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:57 AM
1

The saddest part is that we are painted as a group of butthurt sexists, even by other men. Maybe they're just scared of not getting laid by women if they speak out, but I think many more have been exposed to this since birth or for so long that they just accept it as truth.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:42 AM
1

Not sure if you're implying this a fallacy or if this is an actual anecdote.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:35 AM
1

It's all about getting the most votes and funds. If you can get on Oprah (or some other such blathering), you can get a dedicated follower base.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:33 AM
2

"Women, look to your left, now look to your right. Studies show both these men will rape you." -Seth McFarlane Sadly, any biased misandrist with the slightest bit of academic clout can publish a study proving this, flawed as its methodology is, and be repeated for decades.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:31 AM
1

Not transsexuals as much as castrated eunuchs victimized by the feminist lobby.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:29 AM
1

Child support is basically alimony. If it went to some bank account the kid got control of on their 18th birthday, that would be fine. Or if there were any accountability with that money, it would be fine. Alas, women can spend it any way they want, without even a cent going to the child, and there's nothing you can do about it.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:27 AM
2

Beware blanket statements. You, being a member of the set "women" when "women" has already been defined as "lack a basic sense of empaty for other people" makes you look bad.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:23 AM
1

Blueballs or self-respect, it's a tough choice.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:22 AM
2

Thank you! Finally, the admonishment to not "put pussy on a pedestal" applies both to the bearer and seeker.
/r/MensRights03/06/11 02:21 AM
4

But men, especially if they're white and straight, are never victims of anything.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 06:48 PM
5

It always comes up when people suggest that if FGM is repugnant to you, then why do you support tampering with boys' penises in mass that "But male circumcision doesn't mean you can't orgasm any more." That's entirely besides the point. You can live without tonsils but you don't see us cutting those off people at birth because they'll still be able to eat. Don't cut anything off a person without consent or a medical necessity.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 06:39 PM
32

Of course, if they had actually tried to put a woman in there it would be bad because they put a woman near the world's most dangerous terrorists and are treating women as expendable.
/r/MensRights30/05/11 06:32 PM
1

I'm with you against affirmative action, especially for women. Now that they have more college degrees than men and make up 45% of the workforce those just aren't necessary anymore. It also cheapens their achievements. What do you suggest we do with women, then? I think there is some biological impact on gender, seeing as how most male humans agree with the societal expectations of a male gender rule and vice versa for females. I don't think that men are incapable of caring for children, even if…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 04:02 AM
1

Some parts of your post are really good, and I wanted to upvote you, but then I got to your last paragraph and very nearly downvoted you. I do think women both want to burn the candle at both ends. They do want to both have babies and be mothers but also have fulfilling careers that they're remembered for. As you said, men are incapable of the former, so we've had to let our work speak for us throughout history. I don't necessarily see that making things gender neutral is akin to cutting our dic…
/r/MensRights08/05/11 03:21 AM
1

Maybe we don't really see them as one gendered because they're still so new that we don't have the immediate connotations that John or Mary give after being used for 1,000 years. I could get behind all names eventually becoming gender neutral. Awesome names are awesome and they don't really affect your personality that much. Everybody who sees you is going to know fairly quickly if you're male or female so your name doesn't need to give that away.
/r/MensRights08/05/11 02:27 AM
1

I didn't downvote you, your opinion's just unpopular.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 05:42 PM
1

No, but getting to the point where saying no is not an option (by your own choices) means you take the risk of people doing with you what they will while you're out.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:34 AM
1

Admittedly, there are and always have been more female names. Nearly all names dealing with nature or the calendar are female (Juniper, Dawn, Summer, May, Blossom, Rose, Lily). More male names come from religion (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Isaac, Abraham, Amos, Solomon, Peter, Paul, Christopher, Joseph, Ezekiel, Abel, Cain...) This trend of feminizing male names is not anything really new. Think of names like Roberta, Willa, Josephine, Stephanie, Brianna, and how they're all just female versions…
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:32 AM
3

Every time a woman uses this to get away with being mean, another man reinforces his idea that women are hysterical, emotional creatures that can't or shouldn't be treated equally.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:18 AM
2

Nobody's blaming you for getting a period! What we don't approve of is saying you're on your period or PMSing somehow means you're not responsible for being a jerk.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:14 AM
1

I've always wondered why evolution would make a species where half of its members bleed regularly for about 1/6th of the time the top of the food chain. Even other primates don't have periods, so what happened to humans?
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:12 AM
-1

If a man treated you like this while he had a flu, would you put up with it or would you call him a jerk and demand he apologize for snapping at you?
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:08 AM
0

Hmm, have girlfriend or have principles and not get walked over? Women will always be called hormonal and emotional and illogical as long as they keep pulling this shit.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:07 AM
0

You narrowly avoided giving crazy a baby. There was a reason she went off birth control, and it wasn't her hormones.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:06 AM
-1

ProzacLady I feel bad, therefore you are obligated to do x for me. I can choose not to be a bitch unless my husband calls me on it, then it's totally my uterus having a mind of its own. Your relationship has more than two problems.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:04 AM
1

Don't let her make excuses is the problem. It's like crashing your car, killing someone, and asking for clemency because you were upset that day.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:03 AM
-1

You were pumping yourself full of many times more than what a normal man produces in one day. I don't think you can really say that the amount of hormones a natural body puts out cause these reactions.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 03:00 AM
0

I think PMS is a self-fulfilling prophecy or an example of the placebo effect. Women grow up hearing about PMS and what it does, and then exaggerate whatever natural changes occur. They think they're going to be in more pain than they are and they panic which causes their discomfort and irritability.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:58 AM
2

She said that women cannot control themselves because of their hormones In other news, at least 1/30th of women in the world murdered, lied, or stole today, but that's OK because they were just PMSing.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:54 AM
2

I can't help it! It's my natural male instinct to attack hostile people and animals. I can't be held responsible for my testosterone flareups, which aren't even on a regular schedule like women's estrogen flareups.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:51 AM
1

I can hear the whip cracking from here.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:49 AM
1

Taking responsibility is worthy of respect. Making excuses is not.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:48 AM
1

On top of that, feeling under the weather/hurt does not give you the right to yell at people. Crying is one thing, snapping is quite another.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:46 AM
1

AKA "It's all society's fault/fate." Now I don't have to take any responsibility for anything!
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:46 AM
1

When you steal names from George Lucas or just throw a bunch of letters in a blender and pick a name (Jayda, Brayden, Dakota, Neveah) or take last names and make them first names (McKenzie, Carter, Madison), it's kind of hard to say it's precisely one-sexed or the other. Also see names like Alison and Ashley that went from being mostly male names to mostly female names. One even has "son" right in there.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:40 AM
3

And how the suffragettes (oops, mean suffragists) also made it perfectly clear they weren't out to give those horrible Negroes the vote were all about equal rights.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:36 AM
1

I am pro-choice up to the first trimester. That's so far from being a human that you can end it ethically without moral repercussions, just like someone in a permanent vegetative state. Ending a perfectly healthy baby beyond that point, especially because it's "the wrong gender" makes you a baby-killer.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:35 AM
1

But why are these things considered indications of being gay? That's what we're questioning.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:32 AM
1

no one needs sex What? Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs says you do.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:31 AM
1

What? Getting drunk means you have no way of saying no, even when it's fairly obvious sex is going to happen. Silence is the voice of consent.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:30 AM
2

There's PMS, which may cause slight discomfort, and then there's actual hormonal imbalances that can paralyze people. It's called PMDD. Neither, by the way, gives you the right to be an insensitive jerkoff or break things or exculpate yourself from overreacting.
/r/MensRights07/05/11 02:26 AM
2

You won't ever be able to get Medicare or federal student loans and they remind us that not registering by your 26th birthday will result in prosecution.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 04:26 AM
1

I think the point was how fast 2XC rushed to tell her she should take the money because, even though she got it for no other reason than being a woman, it's still free money. She eventually did decide to take the money and I think the whole thing was a "I'm going to try and look like a hero on the Internet and then agree with the hivemind for max karma" ploy.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 03:15 AM
1

They do have more disposable income. Why do you think most commercials are either specifically targeted at middle-age women, from which we get the "bungling idiot husband" genre or made neutral enough that either a man or a woman would buy the product. Think about it. What was the last commercial you saw, for something other than alcohol, condoms, ED pills, or men's hygiene products, that seemed directed at men?
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:45 AM
4

The whole "having to register for the draft at age 18 or facing jail time", "being punished just as severely for DV as if a man did it and being convicted a similar amount of the time", "fighting in military combat because you're the equal of men", "not being presumed to be a better parent simply for having a certain set of genitals" parts.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:42 AM
1

In the words of a famous Admiral: "IT'S A TRAP!" If we say that's horrible (which it is), we agree with you and you'll browbeat us into shutting up. If we say "but how many boys die too? It's not all girls", we're being sexist and totally okay with girls dying.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:38 AM
7

Well argued! The "shut up" or "calm down" route is the best way to ensure nothing changes. People have to realize that the things they're doing will not be tolerated any more before they'll change anything.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 02:33 AM
3

Yet again, feminism uses sneaky wording to achieve its goals. The total income of all female workers is 80% of all the income of male workers. When you factor in that more men are CEOs and speculators, it's not that surprising. Feminists then like to assert they are paid less than a man doing the same job. Anyone who challenges this dogma will be called sexist and be strawmanned into having to disprove they hit women. There are lies, damned lies, and statistics
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:45 AM
1

When you get to define what sexual assault is and can say people were sexually assaulted even when they don't think they were, it's no surprise. Weird how, despite increased opportunities for women in the past 40 years, pay gaps and sexual assault rates seem to stay the same or go up.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:40 AM
1

Who said this? You're just using a strawman at this point.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:24 AM
1

Can she only lift that much or will she onlyblift that much?
/r/MensRights25/04/11 09:22 AM
1

Maybe don't make it look like you agree with them, then.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 07:55 PM
1

So how are people supposed to have sex/make babies? I definitely think the way women were treated back before they could vote and up to the 60s was shit. They really did have legitimate grievances then. Now, it's just "Now you'll pay for what you did!" revenge.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 05:42 PM
-2

One rogue 2XCer.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:09 PM
1

demons masquerading behind a pretty face and titties. You mean feminists in general?
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:09 PM
1

The Vanilla Privilege post actually seemed fairly down the center. What is radfems' problem with PIV? Do they not want humanity to continue because womyn might get their feelings hurt?
/r/MensRights23/04/11 01:53 PM
6

You know if someone had said this about women they would be banned so quickly their head would spin. Just replace "men" with "Jews" and "rape" with "steal" and it really is Nazi propaganda.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 01:42 PM
2

Wait, what is this blog? Sometimes, it seems pretty balanced, but then they say men don't get to have opinions on abortion and can't post in their comments?
/r/MensRights23/04/11 01:39 PM
4

Broken clock. Twice a day. Yadda yadda yadda.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 12:37 AM
-2

I think you're right to an extent. I'm not a proponent of rigid gender roles, but I agree that, subconsciously at least, women want men to provide for them and men want to provide.
/r/MensRights15/04/11 12:29 AM
1

The dude is basically there to deliver the pizza and give her what she needs to get off. They never show closeups of his face.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:13 AM
3

She's just heard it so many times from anti-porn feminists, she accepts it as true. The dude's basically there to lay pipe. His reactions aren't why people buy the video, male or female. Dudes want to see her face and pretend they're doing that to her. Women want to see her face and pretend that's happening to them.
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:11 AM
2

I definitely think they have some need for it, for sure. It's not exactly easy to give birth. As far as the needs of going into and recovering from labor, they definitely need that. Now, the time after that where they're allowed to care for the baby is a large cause of any pay gap between men and women that may occur. All female employees carry the liability of taking a year of sabbatical just for being employed. For that whole year, you either have to load that work on someone else or just not …
/r/MensRights09/04/11 04:07 AM
4

This is a link to the comments. That thread links to the actual article.
/r/MensRights07/03/11 02:35 AM
1

Right! How come a woman didn't think up the light bulb or car? She was just put down for so long. (!)
/r/MensRights07/03/11 12:57 AM
0

have you ever asked a woman for directions Yes. What a mistake. I missed the street three times and had to drive up and down the street for 10 minutes just to find an attorney's office. Good thing I had my phone's GPS there too.
/r/MensRights04/03/11 04:44 AM
1

Yeah. Even if they maybe can't go out for combat, still make them sign up. If the draft comes back, take them and make them do something on the base.
/r/MensRights16/02/11 06:01 PM
1

Cry to Neutral Milk Hotel? You're doing it wrong. If anything, NMH makes me happy to be alive. It's powerful stuff, but it's an affirmation of the benefits of life and love, not a depressing dirge.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 11:50 PM
1

Yep, 'cause men never get mugged or jumped.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 11:43 PM
2

WTF did I just read? How did she point a gun at him through a video tape? Everyone in this movie, especially the wife, sounds batshit insane.
/r/MensRights05/01/11 11:40 PM
1

Hey, we already do that with black people, this is the next logical step. You know, because women aren't ever given any advantages in life or society ever and are oppressed by "The Men"
/r/MensRights19/12/10 04:51 AM
4

Then again, she could always say, "You know how kids are. They joke around about boys or girls being better. Don't take it so seriously." Notice how nobody would rush to defend a boy who said that so publicly.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 04:46 AM
3

And it would also stop people them from totally making shit up for revenge or hurt feelings.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 04:42 AM
2

I think a better idea is requiring some evidence before we start talking jail terms and sex-offender registries. He said she said is no basis for ruining someone's life, having them raped in prison, and possibly having fraudulent cases in there too.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 04:40 AM
0

inb4 "Women don't lie about that shit and they shouldnt be questioned at all about their traumatic trauma that they'll never learn to live with cause rape is bad. I know someone who was raped and she really was raped. No, I wasn't there, but she was raped. I just know 'cause she's honest like that. Stop hating women."
/r/MensRights19/12/10 04:37 AM
1

A 10 year old thinks their sex is the better one, this obviously proves her right. And what the hell was the dad saying "Let her finish" for. She's being blatantly sexist with no factual evidence. You owe it to the people present to reject bigotry when you hear it.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 04:33 AM
1

Let's not forget TEDWomen.
/r/MensRights19/12/10 04:26 AM
1

True, true. I was exaggerating to make a point, though. Boycotts don't often work if a tiny blip of their sales fall off. The problem is, even if you and all of the people involved in masculism boycott something, it wouldn't hurt JCPenny any. They're too big for our tiny, underground movement to topple.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:59 AM
2

I agree. It's the second-wave feminists trying to keep their ideology alive to a new generation that has seen the least bigoted world ever. People born after 1980 or so have not seen racism or sexism or even homophobia to the extent previous generations have. The newest wave of voters wasn't even alive at the end of the Cold War. The world has changed dramatically since the 1970s for women. Modern feminism (the loudest bits, at least) don't really recognize this and still act as if women are new…
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:56 AM
2

Look at any other subreddits comments about a dubious rape allegation. Anyone questioning the legitimacy of the woman's claims will be told "MensRights is that way." If people say women are sometimes sexist against men, it becomes "What, do you agree with Rush Limbaugh or Glenn Beck? Dumb Christians are dumb, right guise omg wikileaks julian assange women can't be sexist, or they can but it's tolerable because they traditionally were treated worse than black people or jews."
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:50 AM
2

inb4 "OMG! A BELT SANDER! HOW DID YOU KNOW! IT EVEN HAS INTERCHANGEABLE GRITS! THIS IS THE BEST CHRISTMAS EVEERRRRRR!" Your move, Madison Avenue.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:44 AM
1

Yeah, but an ungrateful jerk.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:43 AM
2

As we all know, the only redemption from no sex or a fictitious Kafkaesque portrayal of that metaphor is to buy women shiny things. Their simpler minds love shiny things.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:42 AM
1

Only the man, according to commercials, would be like "WOW! A BELT SANDER! I ALWAYS WANTED ONE OF THESE! THAAAAAAAAAANK YOUUUUUU!" It would help reinforce the idea that men are more like men-children that women sometimes consider their "other child" I wouldn't want basically any tool for a Christmas gift. It would have to be pretty damn awesome or one I specifically asked for.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:41 AM
1

If we boycotted everything that was sexist against men, women would control the economy, since we wouldn't spend anything.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:38 AM
1

boobles You mean baubles? Pronounced like bobble. Although....
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:36 AM
2

The RAM thing perpetuated the whole "women and computers do not mix" thing. That's as bad, if not worse, than the vacuum cleaner.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:34 AM
1

Did anyone else take the "RAM=doghouse" part as an insinuation that "women suck at computers"? Depending on the person, and her needs, RAM can be a very good gift. Let no one say it wasn't expensive.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:32 AM
1

No! That's not proper ettiquette. Even if someone gives you something you hate (an itchy wool sweater with a light up picture of Christopher Walken stitched into the front), you still don't tell them it's a bad gift.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:31 AM
1

Thank you! I don't see the necessity of spending thousands of dollars amounting to two months of salary on a rock excavated by a slave child in Africa. There are dubious "ethical" diamonds, but those aren't even provable. Unless you yourself mine the diamond, or can have some definitive proof it was from a non-slave mine, it's better to avoid them. It also doesn't make sense to be like "WAAH YOU BOUGHT ME CUBIC ZIRCONIUM NOT A REAL DIAMOND. YOU DON'T LOVE ME!"
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:29 AM
2

Does it matter? If this dystopia becomes real, asking for a gift would be reason to be expelled to a Kafkaesque hellhole.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:25 AM
2

If it weren't a PTSD Marine (very conservative branch of the military) swearing a lot, I might believe this article. He does have some points, but there is some hyperbole.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:21 AM
3

Pussy>dignity>respect>free will.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:17 AM
3

Why would an innocent man run away in such a hurry? Running away from someone is an indicator of rape. -any good lawyer to you if you leave.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:16 AM
2

I like the idea of robot partners. Don't like them? Turn 'em off until they learn manners.
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:13 AM
1

DURKA DURR!
/r/MensRights13/12/10 05:11 AM
1

In some ways, that's good. College sports are competitive, football especially. If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.
/r/MensRights05/12/10 02:38 AM
1

That's not a reason why a boy can't play field hockey if he wants to. Granted, he could play numerous other sports, but why settle?
/r/MensRights05/12/10 02:37 AM
2

I hope he gets a field hockey scholarship or something. I want to see the feminist kerfuffle over that.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:28 PM
2

I don't think that's in there. It says any school receiving federal funds has to provide equal opportunities for male and female students in sports.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:26 PM
1

Why is volleyball a "girls' sport"? It's like basketball and football together.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:25 PM
2

That's not so bad because they also have teams for older players and older kids also play. If they had boys' field hockey everywhere, this wouldn't matter, but since there aren't enough boys playing field hockey to make that feasible, they have to let him on.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:24 PM
3

I think it was an attempt to embarrass him off the team. He doesn't want to wear a skirt, but the rest of the team wouldn't mind. To be fair, they made everyone wear one.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:20 PM
7

Why the hell does he have to wear a skirt? No male clothing? Not only does this guy have to face sexism for just wanting to play a sport, he must also be embarrassed in front of his peers? thatsthepoint.png They're trying to embarrass him off the team.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:18 PM
3

Isn't that weird how a guy playing ice hockey is considered tough and manly, but if a man plays field hockey he's a "sissy" or told to go do something more stereotypically masculine?
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:16 PM
1

I don't think most marathons work that way. They give the prizes to both the first place male and female finishers.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:13 PM
1

Would you at least agree that, if there's a girls' field hockey team, there should be a boys' field hockey team? Maybe they don't integrate them but have competitions for boys and girls to play field hockey.
/r/MensRights04/12/10 08:11 PM
1

It's the natural instinct to protect the young. We owe humanity's continued survival to it.
/r/MensRights27/11/10 04:23 AM
1

Still, I have no problem with evacuating children first and young children need a parent with them most of the time. Usually, it's the mother.
/r/MensRights27/11/10 04:22 AM
3

He didn't mean it. He said so.
/r/MensRights25/11/10 12:18 AM
0

I don't get why the women have to talk to each other. Leave that out and it's a pretty good indicator of sexism.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:26 PM
1

I'll pick up the tab for first dates. That's laying the groundwork. I'll usually pay for second dates, too. After that, we're alternating or it's over.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:18 PM
4

If someone abuses you, stay with them and try to fix them. What a good moral.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:16 PM
3

I'd take the combination over either. She can't be spineless and let me run wild (then cry I don't let her decide anything) or pussy-whip me. It's good to balance.
/r/MensRights24/11/10 11:13 PM
11

Yay equal rights. I completely support women's rights to a career and not being afraid, but when those rights infringe men's rights to innocence until proven guilty and self-esteem, it's gone too far.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 04:09 PM
2

Who wants to refilm the situation with a man yelling at his wife and her cowering into silence? "What else does the box say?" "The box says shut up Stephanie." (guy smiles) You and I both know the wrath of God would come down on anyone who even submitted that to an ad agency.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 03:59 PM
12

I was more or less okay with the quesstions until Why is it that half the time men insist on acting like pigs and degrading women? That is so blatantly sexist. I raged hard when I read that. Half the time? Pigs? Insist? You have no room to complain about women being dehumanized and having unfair generalizations leveled against them if you say that.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 03:44 PM
2

Because I disagree with you? How mature.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 03:34 PM
1

How would it affect men? We're not required to grow beards or escort women out of their houses. Women, for that matter, aren't required to wear burqas. Your point about girls being shipped to the Middle East for FGM does nothing to prove that Sharia is invading the west. It means they want it done, but aren't changing laws to allow it. The people that leave anyway are the people trying to get away from tyrannical theocracies, not spread them. You're saying the same things about Muslims that peop…
/r/MensRights23/11/10 03:24 PM
1

Still, you don't run from Sharia law to institute it further. Most western democracies (even the US) are very secular. If you're suggesting we do something like the Chinese Exclusion Act again but with Muslims, learn some history and STFU.
/r/MensRights23/11/10 03:13 PM
-6

I say it's all bullshit. The people fearing Sharia law coming to the western world need to get their head out of their ass. It's not happening, and the fact that Muslims are immigrating there doesn't mean they'll instantly undo all laws.
/r/MensRights22/11/10 11:44 PM
1

But what of a man wants to get circumcised (remote, but possible)? Why can't he choose by himself to get cut? Babies definitely shouldn't be cut, on principle, but even if they are, it's not like they won't be able to enjoy sex.
/r/MensRights15/11/10 03:46 PM
0

The reasoning for a law is weighing its benefits against its drawbacks. Banning FGM: benefits: allows women to enjoy sex, disadvantages: pissed Muslims Banning polygamy: benefits: stops women from being passed around like chattel, disadvantages: pissed Mormons Banning circumcision: benefits: allows people to decide how they want their penis, even if having the procedure would not make them unable to enjoy sex, disadvantages: pissed Jews. Circumcision should not be the norm, but we also can't ban…
/r/MensRights14/11/10 11:55 PM
1

What about Jewish people? I don't think it should be done, but religion should get a pass.
/r/MensRights14/11/10 08:57 PM
1

As for the loss in sensitivity, yes, to some extent, but this is also welcome, or else women would be wet 24/7. Yeah, good argument for sewing vaginas shut.
/r/MensRights21/08/10 04:17 AM
2

Yeah, she ruined his and his father's lives over a board game. That's totally worth forgiving her about.
/r/MensRights21/08/10 04:13 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter