TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iok Archive

View 0 posts and 21 comments by iok on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Along with the top prior poster that is the top five already stated. 6-10: Ortega has a modest family Zuckerberg family were well-off though not very wealthy.; his father did offer to buy him a McDonalds franchise out of school. Jim Walton inherited Walmart. Alice Walton also inherited with brother Jim. Rob Walton also inherited with his siblings. That’s 10. One out of ten with a modest background (Ortega of the Zara fashion brand)
/r/PussyPassDenied08/04/20 09:41 PM
9

Most (All?) of them had wealthy families. Buffet had a wealthy businessman father and grandfather. Arnault’s father was wealthy in manufacturing. Carlos Jim’s father was very wealthy via real estate and retail.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/04/20 04:23 AM
0

Cheers for the troll mate. Leading a white supremacist group makes Nathan a white supremacist. Conservatives don't need people like him. No one needs people like him. Instead of going to a brawl he should get a job.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/17 05:17 AM
0

It is very strange then that Spencer calls out literally "heil trump" to nazi salutes (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1o6-bi3jlxk). if you did any research, you'd know that real nazis orgs like the daily stormer actually hate Richard Spencer. Daily stormer calls him a nazi (https://www.dailystormer.com/paul-town-hall-9-nazi-richard-spencer/)
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 10:29 PM
-2

I am also willing to kill all ISIS members, even the ones that didnt actually kill anyone, yet. Which is how antifa justify their violence against white supremacists and nazis.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 10:03 PM
0

The fellow punching is the leader of a white supremacist group previously convicted of hate crime (Nathan Damigo). Came in to fight with other white supremacists and got the upper hand here.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 09:20 PM
-7

Mate the white supremacists and nazi participating also brought in armour and weapons. The actual white supremacist who punched the girl, Nathan Damigo, previously pulled a gun on a cab driver for being non-white and has been convicted of violent crime. I don't know why an sane conservative would want to associate with this mess. The enemy's enemy can still be stupid violent arsehole.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/17 09:18 PM
-1

My neighbours ain't nazis mate.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:43 PM
-1

You should really just stop assuming anyone who supports Trump is a white supremacist. None of this has anything to do with race, and that's all the left feels like throwing at the right. Mate the puncher is Nathan Damigo a member of white nationalist group Identity Europa.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 12:11 PM
-1

'Does human civilization actually need the black race?' 'Is Black genocide right?' and if it is, 'What would be the best and easiest way to dispose of them?' - Richard Spencer When Richard talks like that and gives nazi salutes at gatherings it is just plain stupid to not call him a nazi or a white supremacist.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 12:07 PM
1

I don't. I don't think punching nazis is effective. But I understand it, and enjoy the schadenfreude of someone who wants to kill my neighbour getting hurt himself instead. Per your earlier posts it seem liked you thought inciting violence is not OK, without mentioning legality. I wanted to show you that neo nazis do explicitly publicly incite violence and do in cases act on it. In this most recent case the violence has gone both ways (for example Trump supporters chasing people to beat https://…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 11:34 AM
1

Sure. Inciting violence is ok as long as it is legal. It's an opinion that was different than your earlier posts. Hence Richard Spencer inciting violence publicly in text and speech is ok because US law does not cover or enforce against his incitements. US law does not cover it because his incitement is unlikely to result in action. However that position can change, see the KKK and Brandenburg v. Ohio. I also only claimed that these particular nazis were almost certainly not in the streets sayin…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 11:10 AM
1

In an earlier post you were against inciting violence and claimed neo-nazis don't do so publicly. However given neo-nazis do publicly incite violence you now just want people to not break the law. Fair enough.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 10:39 AM
1

It is particularly arbitrary to say inciting violence with marches or gathering is bad, but other mediums are ok. As though Richard could incite people to kill your and my family, and that is ok as long as he isn't marching at the same time. That said Richard Spencer is active, and does speak at public gatherings conveying his ideas encouraging nazism. Accordingly Richard sounds like a guy you would punch. It just sounds like you are apologetic for the nazi because you don't like antifa. Which i…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 10:22 AM
1

"As used in this chapter, the term “to incite a riot”, or “to organize, promote, encourage, participate in, or carry on a riot”, includes, but is not limited to, urging or instigating other persons to riot" Note the not limited to urging or instigating a riot. That means urging genocide can be included. but shall not be deemed to mean the mere oral or written (1) advocacy of ideas or (2) expression of belief, not involving advocacy of any act or acts of violence or assertion of the rightness of,…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 09:53 AM
-1

Inciting violence by neo-nazis is normally more subtle and private because overt racism has become taboo. We have made them afraid. For example a subtle exert from Richard Spencer: "Does human civilization actually need the Black race?" "Is Black genocide right?" and, if it is, "What would be the best and easiest way to dispose of them?"
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 09:38 AM
-5

call me when they're murdering my neighbor Or how about we call you when they are inciting violence per your own prior post. That is neo-nazism after all. I don't agree with the antifa's stance on making nazis afraid but I can understand it. When Richard Spencer or any other nazi is violently humiliated I don't feel as though the perpetrator has a good or bad ideology, but I do enjoy the little bit of schadenfreude of another nazi copping it. The problem with such violence though is if we take t…
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 09:28 AM
-7

Neo-nazis have the explicit goal of violence and murder of your neighbour.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 09:13 AM
1

They're really just radical leftists who consider most anything to the right of themselves fascism. Do they really? The last publicised incident was with Richard Spencer, an actual neo-nazi aka person who wants to murder your neighbour. Not that the punch should happen, but it isn't middle America (or wherever) that is getting beaten.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 09:03 AM
-15

A neo-nazi sucker punching a girl justified because of a facebook movie quote post? If we are justifying violence by the written intent of the victim, then we should beat all Nazis apparently. Instead we are supporting cowards that per their failed philosophy would kill our neighbours given the chance, because we don't like liberals/dreadlocks/"cucks". The cunt's even spent time in jail for pulling on a cab driver because he was non-white.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:34 AM
-14

Neo-Nazi: Want to kill our neighbours given the chance Antifa: Want to beat the people above. Not that I agree with it. "Wrong in principle, and tactically self-destructive. When we move to the arena of violence, the most brutal guys win - and that's not us" Chomsky
/r/PussyPassDenied16/04/17 08:24 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter