TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ionstorm20 Archive

View 3 posts and 120 comments by ionstorm20 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

If a woman gets raped or reproductivly coerced by a man. She has Hold on. That's not what I said. I said suppose the man stealthed or punctured the condom. As in she doesn't realize she's pregnant for 4-5 weeks. She's got abortion in most states. But in some states it's already illegal, and if the SC draft becomes law it'll be at least 22 of them. Also, even in the case of rape, I'm not sure if these places will allow women to get plan B. I know with the law in Texas, it's not as easy as Pharmac…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:54 PM
1

I'm concerned about the wage gap not because of the 30+% bullshit, but because of the impact the actual 4% will have on retirement. The ability to save an extra 4% for 30+ years has a substantial impact on quality of life. None of the politicians want to talk about the real wage gap or the impact of it though. Likewise, the ability to save or spend an extra 25% on what is important to you for 20 years has a substantial impact on quality of life. 2 things. 1) I'm not sure why the wage gap came up…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 04:31 PM
1

You were and you still are. Agree to disagree. From where I stand you're placing overemphasis on what would happen to the man while minimizing the effect raising a child would have on a woman. I'm more accurately describing what would happen. Where am I saying that? My apologies. I just assumed you were in favor of the SC supposed view of abortion since the original post that was very much against abortion since men can't abort and you were arguing with me. My fault for assuming. So I guess it w…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:51 PM
0

3 things. I'm not minimizing the impact a child will have on the man's life, I'm realistically saying what impact it'll have. Sure, he might not be able to afford all the luxuries he originally had. But realistically he's still going to be working after the child is born. But to basically say that "A quarter of a man's life will be drastically changed because he has to work", doesn't really hold water because he's already going to work. He's just paying for the kid he helped create. The majority…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 03:02 PM
0

Plus, this makes it sound like the man wasn't working and now all of a sudden is forced to put in the hours. In actuality, he was likely ALREADY working and is now being forced to use some of his money towards his child. But the mother wouldn't be taking care of the child if it weren't for the man's involvement.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 02:16 PM
0

Actually I'm a dude, so I'm not asking for rules for myself. I-m asking that others are protected from assholes. But sure. Let's suppose the way to make things equitable was to give men that choice. So if a woman didn't have any protections, what would stop anyone from doing the things I suggest? Because right now the rules are set up where it IS equal. The low income worker takes care of the kid. The high income worker pays. If the kid isn't aborted then both parties contribite to the kid. If t…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 10:27 PM
0

Generally speaking laws should be in place to make outcomes equitable to all parties. There is no law that says folks driving a Maserati get to go 50 over the speed limit, but folks driving a Toyota go 20 under. Unfortunately the laws that are on the books when it comes to reproductive rights are because those rights protect women from shitty people that gain far more than they lose. I think everyone can agree if there's no consequences for something then there's nothing making you doing said ac…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 07:43 PM
7

Empirical evidence seems to show that for better or worse Republicans are willing to stand up for each other when it comes to matters of legality.
/r/PussyPass14/02/20 09:04 PM
13

Because the article is from "Conservative US" If it were a republican doing it, I'm betting the website wouldn't have the article.
/r/PussyPass14/02/20 05:35 PM
1

So before I say something stupid/silly, is this saying that the women whom won the 2018 World Cup earned 131 million for the team vs the men earning 4.4 billion, or is it saying that the mens team earned FIFA 4.4 bill vs women earning FIFA 131 Mill?
/r/PussyPassDenied13/06/19 05:18 PM
0

So I'm confused. Do you believe that there are 1/2 as many republicans as democrats? I know democrats are generally speaking ahead, but I think it's by 25-30%. but not 200%. And even if there are 2x as many democrats than republicans, why are we artificially keeping the party going? If one party is loosing members, then it loses members. If their ideals aren't reaching new people then they should change with the people that they want. They shouldn't be rigid, and if they are then they should suc…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 01:09 PM
1

In Carolina at least a dude working for the republican party went around, took the votes of absentee Ballots from Democratic neighborhoods and got rid of them. That's not a big conspiracy of democrats trying to make republicans look bad, it was a dude named Leslie McCrae Dowless that's a convicted felon and registered Republican. Why he did it, we have no idea (IIRC)...but he did it. And he might or might not have been working under the orders of the republican party candidate, but he is a regis…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:24 PM
0

I'm not sure what you're talking about not being a good argument. The numbers that are what they are, or the football example? Because the numbers don't lie. If you were to be able to make a case where the numbers lied, then I'd be happy to look at it. As it stands, the numbers are more votes for Hillary over Trump. Now if you have anecdotal evidence that Trump is more popular than Hillary (at the time of the election) then I've got nothing to disprove it. But from a sheer numbers perspective, y…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:17 PM
-1

To be fair, if the rest of the country believes as you do, then they should have voted and proven that. As it stands, Republicans put up a candidate that was less liked than Hillary and won. How would you like it if your favorite football team lost about 10% of the time because the opponent's points counted as more valuable than yours even though you had the majority of points. Would you still like football? Probably not.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 06:08 PM
-1

Not the other guy, but take a look at this video. ​
/r/MensRights03/01/19 06:02 PM
0

Sorry, it is becoming more and more difficult to sift out a poe from the real thing considering that there are people that would unironically use your exact statement. One of them is literally 20' from me right now. Honestly? I would suggest that for future ironic comments you put a /s afterwards..it helps folks determine your meaning and might save you a few down-votes.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 05:19 PM
1

Sorry, I'm confused. While you just said... Hence in initial comment, I didn't ascribe that to President or political parties, just to boom and bust cycles in capitalism. ...in your last statement you said: Dems exploits the economy created by Republican for handouts and crashes it. Republicans builds it again for them. So it sounds to me like you're absolutely ascribing the boom and bust cycles (which is true) to political parties (possibly true, but wrong conclusion). So I was responding to th…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 03:04 PM
3

How is it epic? Dude paid 130k to her, and 390k in legal fees. He got back 293k. So he's still down almost 230k and might still have to pay millions.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 02:24 PM
-3

You have that backwards. Generally speaking the policies of republicans cause more hardships for the country, and democrats increase the money through more taxes. Republicans tend to get stronger economies from a Democratic government, and Democrats inherit weaker governments from Republicans. Look at Obama/Bush or Trump/Obama.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 02:16 PM
1

First off, I want to point out that generally speaking Presidents have very little real impact on an economy. But for what impact they have I would be remiss to not make a small correction in your statement. I think you have your concepts backwards - but it's understandable why. Generally speaking (at least in the past 30 years give or take) the democrats have been the ones that turned out a positive GDP from their policies. Republicans have been the ones in charge when an economy has been doing…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 02:14 PM
-1

Not that I think she should have been in office either, but more than 1/2 of the votes were for her...
/r/PussyPassDenied12/12/18 01:52 PM
0

If you had a guy post a completely different post and say something in the same vein I would absolutely say you're right. But that's not what happened. The dude basically took her entire story, changed the genders and the object in question, then posted it as a response to her story. It would be like me reading your post and just flipping a few words with a username that (let's face it) points to a whole movement that many folks consider to be hateful. Don't believe me? Look at subreddits like M…
/r/MensRights12/10/18 05:00 PM
1

1) What happened to goodbye? I gave you the go-ahead. 2) When applying to higher up positions (kinda like a SC job) office politics play a huge role in you getting/not getting the position. On a side note, one would hope that both republicans and democrats want the person whom will be best for the job. 3) The position is apparently going to be filled by him regardless of how terrible a candidate he might be. And don't mistake that. He's a terrible candidate unless you are a) a person whom has co…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 04:34 PM
1

Burden of proof? I ask again. Did this go to court and I not hear about it? The terms you're throwing around are legal terms that are used in criminal cases. This is a job interview. If you are a hiring manager and I apply for a job, and between you calling me and the interview you get a note from one of your co-workers that I raped a woman, would you continue to hire me? Would you look and see what's going on, or would you say not worth it? You wouldn't hire me, because if there's a slight chan…
/r/MensRights05/10/18 03:00 PM
0

I agree, they aren't sending their brightest folks. 1) Presumption of innocence is reserved for the accused not the accuser in a Criminal Trial. Did this go to criminal trial while I wasn't paying attention? 2) I agree no one has corroborated her story. As long as you ignore Julie Swetnick, Dr. Elizabeth Swisher, Lynne Brookes, Richard Oh.... And while some of those are only heresay, some of them say they either experienced it happening to them, or remember BK telling them about stories where he…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 04:32 PM
0

So let me guess. Fox news says she's lying, so it's only liberal shills that would bother saying otherwise? GTFOH with that political crap. Both sides have given their story, and now it's up to the FBI to determine whom did it. Until then you can't say he's telling the truth and she's lying. If you assume he's telling the truth, then you need to also assume she's telling the truth. They both made their statements under oath, so they are either both truthful, or both lying.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 04:02 PM
0

Funny enough, that's not one of the 4 folks the FBI has investigated. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/10/01/us/politics/kavanaugh-fbi-investigation-witnesses.html I accidentally clicked send earlier, so the below is entirely an edit. Also, I point out that you're saying they are false accusations. In actuality they are un-falsifiable. Very different. In one Ford is a distinct liar, and Kavanaugh is telling the truth. In the other, either could be lying or telling the truth. Hence the ne…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:51 PM
1

Who said they are uncorroborated baseless? The last part wherein I said he made many statements under oath as lies is a direct point to that. You can tell me that they are uncorroborated all you want, but the truth of the matter is that we have now several women that say they find Dr. Ford's statement to be truthful (because he supposedly did similar things to them), and we have several of his college friends say he is likely to have drank to the point of blacking out (so he wouldn't know if he …
/r/MensRights03/10/18 03:23 PM
0

I'm not the other poster, but I feel he's unqualified for several reasons that have nothing to do with this and several that do (because of the testimony the other day, not the accusation). For example, I look at his stance on EPA. If you're a company, and you're trying to do something bad for the environment, the EPA is supposed to step in and tell you no. He's sided with companies like 15 times as the swing vote against the EPA. He believes in an odd way that corporations are people, and yet n…
/r/MensRights03/10/18 02:52 PM
2

Apparently they released over a million pages of documents from before he worked with bush and hid almost all of his documents when working with Bush. Dems are trying to say that time is the most relevant to his inner thoughts, republicans are trying to say he was a glorified paper pusher then.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 09:35 PM
1

Didn't they only release the majority of the documents (like 50k pages) a mere 12-15 hrs before the hearing? While yes that would mean the majority of them are released, it's not like they could have had a chance to review them in a thorough enough detail before that hearing took place.
/r/MensRights07/09/18 12:49 PM
1

Let me ask a (what is possibly a) silly question. Would you be in favor of men asking money from women every month if we had artificial wombs and the man wanted to keep it but the woman didn't? As in the woman gave up the child, the man had the fetus transported to the artificial womb, and now for the next 18 years we had a mom forced to pay beyond her control for a child she obviously didn't want because she aborted?
/r/MensRights19/06/18 12:46 PM
2

Took a few minutes, but... http://www.news-graphic.com/breaking_news/teacher-coach-gets-years-in-prison-for-having-sex-with/article_845cf752-d489-11e3-a50d-001a4bcf887a.html
/r/PussyPass14/05/18 05:32 PM
2

Well to be fair, a good bit of the 90k were male rapes. If we assume that just 25% of those cases were male rapes, then we're looking at 22.5k were male victims, 67.6 were female. That means that by those numbers, 5.5k males and 1.8k females were falsely imprisoned (still way to much imho).
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:32 PM
1

I only see this
/r/MensRights10/05/18 02:10 PM
2

Honestly, when it comes to debates, and discussions, I would try my best to not let it get to c. By trying to talk off what they said by saying "Well, I wasn't there so it must not be that important" is terrible debate tactic. I would try and keep it closer to a modified A/B. Acknowledge that they were in part right, but don't let them dictate the terms to which they were correct on. (This is generally good advice if you ever have a formal debate.) For instance, I might be inclined to say someth…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 03:50 PM
1

There's a big grey area between "staying and suffering with forever" and "completely abandoning" someone who is dependent on you. I set up my examples as either or, because at this point she has two choices. Be miserable, or not. She might have done something different leading up to where she is now, but at this point, I think she's passed the point of alternative choices. And you might have other options, and if you do, great! But she might not have those same options. And yes, I would expect m…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:41 PM
1

Comparing marriage (a lifelong commitment) to a "Job" is the exact problem with this mindset. Are you married? If you are and knew that the rest of your life you were going to be a vegetable with the inability to do anything but sit there and drool, would you expect your wife to wait you on day and night? If I have enough respect for the person I'm getting married to, I would reasonably expect to tell them to leave me should I get as bad as that guy got. The point of the job example was not to b…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 05:43 PM
0

Ever have a job? I have. I've had jobs that are great. I've had jobs that are terrible. I've even had jobs that started great, but ended terribly. Think of it like this. You start by getting a fantastic job doing that thing you love doing. And one day of your 10 years of working there, the job changes entirely. You used to be loving every day, but instead now you are cleaning toilets, and you hate cleaning toilets. They move your branch to a different location 3 hrs away, and now ask you to do e…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 12:37 PM
2

A man died here! This is not a good time to loose one's head. It's no way to get ahead in life. It's a shame the man wasn't more headstrong. Because now he'll never get to be the head of a major corporation. Sorry, couldn't help myself. I'll just be over here pulling myself together.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 04:42 PM
3

And doesn’t she have any moral failing in the affair?? Seriously, WTF. CNN has “trump had unprotected sex with me in 2006” as breaking news. ENOUGH SAID. She met The Chad and is now an old, dried up porn star looking for some money. And has a wimpy “white knight” lawyer fighting her fight. First off, how many presidents have had affairs and been sued by porn stars? I think this is the first one. So yes, anything that's related to it is kinda breaking news. The fact that she took polygraphs, and …
/r/MensRights27/03/18 05:33 PM
1

As an FYI, I've got a TL:DR at the end in bold so you can skip past my thought and get to the meat and potatoes. This is just my two cents, but I find that most feminism is not so much against men as for women. This is an important distinction to make. Most every feminist will cite many different things they do as helping men. But frequently when I look at whatever they are citing, I find it's really something that helps women, and sort of helps men as a byproduct or an afterthought. But when it…
/r/MensRights14/03/18 06:40 PM
1

By no means am I historian, but this is what I was able to find with 10 minutes of searching with google-fu. Notice a few additional examples of the strong anti-slavery sentiments held by great numbers of the Founders: [N]ever in my life did I own a slave. - John Adams, Signer of the Declaration, one of only two signers of the Bill of Rights, U. S. President But to the eye of reason, what can be more clear than that all men have an equal right to happiness? Nature made no other distinction than …
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:55 PM
1

If one reads the Virginia Papers of Jefferson, he goes into detail about how it is obvious that Blacks simply do not possess the same brainpower on average as Whites, which is something that scientific data completely supports. Have you heard the idea of when you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail? I think your ingrained bias is what's causing your current view of African Americans. (Something we see all the time among Blacks in person) I actually don't. Of course it might be because I tr…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:53 PM
2

but we had extremely intelligent people like Jefferson who lived in close proximity to Blacks who were able to make very accurate generalizations Oh, so what knowledge of Genetics did Jefferson have that shows he's an expert on the inner working of black folks? that are still extremely applicable to Blacks to this very day. I'll bite, what was applicable for black folks back in the 1600's that's still applicable today? One doesn't need IQ tests to really determine that Blacks aren't very intelli…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 08:44 PM
1

You're implying that race is simply skin color when science doesn't tell us that it's true. Science tell us if anything that there are ridiculous amounts of observable biological differences in ethnic groups, such as average intelligence, average height, average metabolic rate, etc. And how much of that scientific proof did they have back in the 1500-1600's? You can't take modern knowledge of genetics and apply it to folks back then. Back then you were white or you were a lesser person. A moore.…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:50 PM
1

So, you want to celebrate a system wherein you were set up advantaged because of the color of your skin? That's not celebrating your heritage, that'd celebrating the fact that you got more because of the color of your skin. So if I were to use your logic, what would you say if I told you you need to celebrate black and brown men and women because literally if it weren't for them, humans wouldn't be a race. That Neither you or I would be where we are now if it weren't for them. Also by that logic…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:30 PM
4

TIL.... Although upon reflection, I don't know if I want to waste the new thing I learn today on that.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:04 PM
2

No, being white separates you from your non white folks. What is something specifically that happened in your past that you attribute to your whiteness that needs to be celebrated? //Edit Another way to phrase it - What about your past (that specifically only happened because of your white-ness and not other parts of your past) needs to be celebrated? Your family came over from where? What caused them to come over? Why did they come here? And unless you come from white-topia, the nation of white…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:56 PM
4

Because then they would call themselves European or American (depending on what they are advocating for) - there isn't a need to clarify their whiteness. And if that isn't apparent, ask yourself what does the clarifier of White have anything to do with their culture/heritage? The answer should be that it doesn't. It only serves to separate themselves from b/b folks.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:48 PM
5

Ok and? Do White people not have the right for ethnic advocacy? You're perfectly allowed to have Italian pride, Irish pride, German pride, Russian pride, Scottish pride, Australian pride, Spanish pride etc. In fact, you'll find there are parades that celebrate Irish, Italian, etc...pride. No one says any of that is racist because it celebrates culture and heritage. In fact, if that's what you were advocating for, I'd be all for it. What you're saying is white advocacy. That's not a celebration o…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:05 PM
3

That's because it is. Those 2 are both actors on Trollstation.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 03:40 PM
8

This is the right answer. And if you want when you're done (maybe the following day or weekend, talk to her about some issues that you feel like you need to have discussed. Bring attention to your concerns, without minimizing the things she's fighting for. If you two are with each other for the long haul, then she should be willing to do the same for you eventually.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 07:38 PM
2

That is flat out wrong. My wife asked me to marry her. My friend recently got asked out by a girl. First off, congrats on being married. Anecdotal evidence aside, I think a large part of the issue is that generally speaking women tend to be the ones that wait to be chased, or at least are more than happy of waiting for the guy to take the initiative. Only in certain circumstances do women tend to ask men out on dates. And many times, the women asking the date is still expecting the man to pay, e…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:05 PM
1

Edit Sorry about the length of this response. I didn't realize it was this long as I was typing. I will assume you come here under good faith in the hopes that someone will honestly answer your question, so here's my 2 Reddit copper. Women don’t hate men (1% may) And I generally think the people here don't hate women. 1% may. (Actually I heard once that generally you can expect 5% of a population to dislike something just because, so maybe it's closer to 5%. I dunno though) Having a longer mater…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 03:54 PM
3

The correct way to think about it is where they have less rights. Even if that was the real question to ask, when do we get to the question of what to do when men have less rights? When feminism has solved it's problems 100%? Hopefully not, because that will never happen. And that's not me being snarky, snippy, or threatening. We will never get rid of 100% of the rapists. We will never get rid of 100% of crime. It's impossible (at least for society as it stands right now). I think that public ed…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:52 PM
5

If I can give you my 2 reddit copper...I read what you said very differently than what you implied. "advocacy for women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes". From this point if you think men and women should be equal in society, you fit into the definition of being a feminist. Actually, what this tells me is that women's right get brought up to the level of men's rights when they have less. It also tells me nothing about bringing up men's rights to the level of women's when they h…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:13 PM
1

Ever watch Watchmen?
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:26 PM
1

I think you should take a long hard look at your beliefs if you think trading sexual favors for job opportunities is OK. That's a terrible way to think. If you are a consenting party willing to have sex to get what you want, It's not my place to say how dare you...you're old enough to do what you want. I have no more control over your body than you do of mine. This is a perfectly legal and moral thing to do. What's wrong/illegal/immoral is if one party says "I'm offering withholding a job opport…
/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:21 PM
1

Well, this is I guess were we part ways. In my opinion, this will not harm anyone, and will help someone out there, so it's not a bad idea.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:42 PM
1

So you're saying this is of no help to anyone? That absolutely 100% of the people that will read this are going to have absolutely no use or need for it? Because if it helps someone, then it's worth it.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 08:09 PM
1

1) Remembering the name Angela is not spy level shit. 2) How many people will in all seriousness help a man if he goes to a bartender and says help me? Sure they might assume you need assistance with your drink, but how many of them will know when you say help me you really mean don't let me leave here by myself? Especially if you're fading. 3) Not myself, but I know of a friend that got drugged at a bar once (I think Rohypnol). Albeit the place he was at didn't have anything like this on the wa…
/r/MensRights20/12/17 07:31 PM
1

And if drugs are involved? There's a point wherein you won't be able to help yourself, and that's where Angela will be your best friend.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 03:32 PM
1

Albeit, I only know of what I read online, so I'll use this excerpt from Wikipedia. Origin and theory The Domestic Abuse Intervention Project was the first multi-disciplinary program designed to address the issue of domestic violence. This experimental program, conducted in Duluth in 1981, coordinated the actions of a variety of agencies dealing with domestic conflict. The Duluth model curriculum was developed by a "small group of activists in the battered women’s movement" [3] with 5 battered w…
/r/MensRights04/12/17 07:40 PM
1

The only thing I can see from the limited exposure I have to this case is he might have a basis for Slander/false allegations. And while he might get some headway with slander, I doubt it would get any traction for false allegation (most DA's or Lawyers don't push for false allegations against female rapists because it's hard to convince a jury that she did have ill intentions), but that would likely be what the lawsuit brings up against her. edited for additional thoughts
/r/MensRights29/09/17 12:42 PM
1

North Carolina. I have friends living in apartments for 600-800 a month. Heck, if you don't mind factoring in the cost of taxes, you can mortgage a whole home for 800-1000 a month. You'll be about an hr away from a major city, 2-2 hrs away from your pick of the beach or mountains and the jobs aren't terrible. The downside is that the pay isn't as great and if you have kids, there isn't a ton for them to do.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 02:47 PM
1

Yeah, sorry. I can't change the title at this point, got a flair I could use to get a better understanding?
/r/MensRights28/07/17 12:24 PM
2

In the US, people can be fired for whatever reasoning their boss wants. So as long as the boss doesn't put on your termination paperwork something blatantly sexist or racist, they have all the power when it comes to your job. So if a boss sees your political posts on social media, and he disagrees with them, he is fully within his power to terminate. He doesn't even have to explain why, he can just tell you you're fired. And that's that. No real ability to fight back and reasonably expect to win…
/r/MensRights11/07/17 02:20 PM
1

The only factor that makes you see that the escalator is for men is because its blue. Well, that and the symbol that has been chosen to represent men vs women that's plastered on every step. Nevermind, didn't read the next person's comments. IGNORE ME!
/r/PussyPassDenied06/07/17 07:12 PM
4

I think it's something like 20 posts in a certain time frame now. So if you want to have a chat, it'll probably tick off.
/r/PussyPassDenied03/07/17 02:38 PM
1

To be fair it probably is. Just like your experiences have colored your responses. edit Also, there is no need to downvote everything I have said just because I disagree with you.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 04:10 PM
0

This is called moving the goal posts. Moving the goalposts is an informal fallacy in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded. That is, after an attempt has been made to score a goal, the goalposts are moved to exclude the attempt. This was not moving the goalposts. This was my rebuttal that you apparently don't like. What has been going on is one of Cherry Picking. Either that or you have been unable to determine t…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 03:58 PM
0

They're not a minor part of a larger movement like we've seen with feminism. Can you prove they (the man hating feminists) are the minority? For all we know they're the majority. First of all, those weren't vocal minorities of a movement, those were the movements. And before they were movements, they were a minority of the people that saw a problem, voiced their opinion and people joined them because they saw the problem too. But if it makes you feel any better, explain MGTOW. What was once part…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 03:30 PM
0

Well I think I see where are differences are. When someone speaks you assume no one is listening to them, whereas I do. It's part of the reason why we used to say "the squeaky wheel either gets the oil, or gets replaced." That's just not how it works at all. Yes. Yes it is. Look at all of the movements that have come to be. Feminism at one point was a vocal minority. Black lives Matter was a vocal minority. MRA's are a vocal minority. All of these movements aren't minor anymore, because at one p…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 02:37 PM
1

So let me get this straight, when I made a point (for you) and then rebutted it...you're saying the rebuttal doesn't count, but the point I made for you does? And when I explain the still valid rebuttal you hand wave it because...you don't agree with it? Let me try a different way of saying it...using your KKK example: While the KKK might be a minority, with their large voice (convincing others to join), their advocating killing people, and telling everyone that they were superior...they were a …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 02:17 PM
0

Well, ok. That's partially true - I did point out it was a minority but I also had a rebuttal against it. However, that statement you copied was more of an afterthought. And it has nothing to do with the rebuttal of your original statement when you said... What's the big deal if they're only concerned about women's rights? and to which I responded The big deal is that some are touting for the rights of one group of people (in this case, women) at the expense of the rights of the other group (in …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 01:11 PM
1

You're also forgetting preconceived notions. If I think that X group will behave in Y way, I'm much more likely to remember the Y way as what happened and hand wave all those acting in a Z way as the outlier data points - even if there are more people acting in a Z manner. Although I should point out I would imagine that the % of the people that is a Man Hating Feminist is probably much larger than extreme minority. I would say it's as large as 2-5%. A quick search on Tumblr would show hundreds …
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 12:44 PM
0

The big deal is that some are touting for the rights of one group of people (in this case, women) at the expense of the rights of the other group (in this case, men). The movement is for equality, but then has people whom advocate for supremacy. It's where we get #killAllMen, #MenAreTrash, & #BanFathersDay. For instance, if you were to switch the genders in any of those and repeat them back to whomever posted it, you would have a shitstorm on your hand. But when you repeat what they say, you get…
/r/PussyPassDenied26/06/17 12:26 PM
4

Thank you for understanding!
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 12:42 PM
14

I am all for being equal, and giving women the same opportunities as we give men, but as far as definitions go, I'm a little confused. Does Wikipedia have a good definition of Feminism? Because if it does great. But Wikipedia's definition only concerns itself with giving women opportunities insofar as it relates to men. But when men need opportunities, the definition doesn't apply. How about merriam-webster? Well point two once again means it's only for women's rights and interests. So how can w…
/r/PussyPassDenied23/06/17 12:21 PM
2

Fun word fact: If you are dieing something, you are cutting or stamping it with a die, which is a device used for cutting, forming, or engraving metals. It is a process used in machining, and your local town may even have a “tool and die shop,” which would make extensive use of the process. If you are referring to death, the verb you have in mind is most likely dying. So in your above example, I would agree. Everyone can get PTSD and everyone with the proper training can engrave.
/r/MensRights30/05/17 02:20 PM
6

Because 1xChromosome is known as Turner Syndrome.
/r/MensRights23/05/17 12:26 PM
1

To be fair, I think the movie Striptease and showgirls garnered some nationwide attention when it came out.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 02:01 PM
1

It's very simple. When someone tells me that feminism = equality, I ask them to look at the definition. fem·i·nism ˈfeməˌnizəm/Submit noun the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men. You see, feminism is for a womans rights and bringing them up to the rights of men when they are less then a mans rights. However it does absolutely nothing for a Mans Rights when they are less than that of women. Men and women both have their share of problems, …
/r/MensRights12/12/16 08:14 PM
2

Well, the 1 in 25, or 1 in 10 or 83% effectiveness is only valid depending on what stage of the testing you take your numbers on.
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:28 PM
5

Not my post, but I don't have the original author's name: Published results of the Male Birth Control Tests (And part of the reason why this was scrapped by the WHO): Depression - 23.3x more prevalent in the male injection (particularly worrying given the prevalence of suicide among men) Acne - 14.25x more prevalent in the male injection Musculoskeletal pain - 345x more prevalent (woah!) in the male injection. Headache - 88.3x more prevalent in the male injection Weight gain - 1.67x more prevale…
/r/MensRights04/11/16 01:21 PM
1

Also, If I were you, I would try to steer away from things like that, where there is fairly ambiguous ground to stand on and bring up things like: VAWA (Violence against Women Act) when we're finding out that in non-reciprocal IPV (Intimate Partner Violence) that women are 70% of the instigators and sole abusers, and in reciprocated, the ratios are 50/50. And how 1.6 Billion is spent every year on this, and 0 is spent on Men's violence Victims. How women as a group pay taxes, but overall, they c…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 03:07 PM
1

I think I would point out the laws that make it illegal to do so, and if they point out examples of companies that do it, you need to point out companies like Yahoo that do the same to men. The thing to keep in mind is that it's outright illegal to hold someone back because of their gender. Saying a company is doing it is a serious accusation and it needs to be supported by facts. Barring proof, by them saying that companies are doing it, they are doing so based on their thoughts and feelings, o…
/r/MensRights02/11/16 02:26 PM
2

Will you be the first or second speaker in the debate?
/r/MensRights01/11/16 12:30 PM
2

Oh well....Move Along...move along.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:38 AM
1

So how did it go?
/r/MensRights31/10/16 01:16 PM
1

Why you stuck-up, half-witted, scruffy looking....Pepsi Lover!
/r/MensRights31/10/16 12:41 PM
2

"Moving the goal posts" if they're losing the argument or realise they're fucked they'll simply make up the definitions of words or switch them around to suit their argument. Interestingly, Jehovah's Witnesses did this back in the 50's (?) when they updated their bible. Only religion in the world to do this. Apparently this is an effective tactic as they are one of the fastest growing religions (or at least that's what they tell me when they come to my place for discussions).
/r/MensRights20/10/16 03:29 PM
1

If it was illegal, the store would have been shut down by now. It's not. Ergo, not illegal. Like I said, they are basically offering women a coupon for 7% off. I would also assume it extends to anyone that identifies as female. But offering coupons to certain people is not illegal. For instance, many people I know shop at stores that reward repeat shoppers with coupons for being repeat shoppers. I don't qualify because I don't shop there enough. It's not illegal because I don't qualify. Besides,…
/r/MensRights12/10/16 11:32 AM
1

This is a much better example of tit for tat when it comes to violence Don't hate me, I just like this particular clip.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:32 PM
1

So, they call it a 7% man tax, but really, being a female in that store offers you the benefit of getting a 7% price discount on purchases. Since they give you the discount it roughly covers the cost of taxes, they call it a man tax. It's not illegal for the same way that stores offer coupons to certain customers but not to others. (IE, those that purchased newspaper X get a coupon, but those that purchases newspaper Y don't). Could they have come up with a better name for it? Yes. But really, t…
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:24 PM
1

Unfortunately it's not. They aren't charging men a 7% tax, they are just giving women a 7% discount. It makes up for tax and so they get to put that in the window. Just clever advertising. The real thing is how they have gotten such media (news and social) attention that their business has actually gone way up since posting it.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 06:18 PM
1

How about this list? Or this webpage
/r/MensRights11/10/16 04:59 PM
1

Suicide Prevention lines by country Hopefully this helps. If you don't want to tell your country, you can look it up on the list and speak to someone in your home country in your preferred language.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 04:02 PM
5

Fixed it for you. She got special treatment because she's Hilary a Clinton. Next question. The Clinton's in my opinion are the closest thing we have to royalty in this country.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:56 PM
1

So I'm not sure what you're looking for. Hear me out. I checked on google looking for "how to deal with being underpaid" And got lots of results. Almost all of them gender neutral. Then I looked under "how to deal with being underpaid - as a guy" and I got lots of results. Although to be fair quite a few of them are with reversed genders, many of them are gender neutral with good information. Then I looked up "reverse sexism and the workplace" and got lots of pages. So are you looking for inform…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:17 PM
3

One small problem with that. The rest of the government can basically block anything she does or change anything she does, which would be plenty of proof that an all encompassing power is working behind the scenes keeping people down. In all seriousness, it was the biggest problem I had with Bernie Sanders. He could have all these grandiose ideas going into the presidency, and I was fearful that most of the things he wanted would be completely gutted and re-molded by congress and the senate. And…
/r/MensRights27/09/16 12:55 PM
1

So I don't know about anyone else, but that article link is not working for me.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 04:07 PM
1

"yes, hitting is wrong no one should anyone, but men especially shouldn't hit a woman back, most men are stronger than most women, a man can restrain her or walk away. Only if his life is threatened should he hit her back. This is biology. It's nature, it can't be changed. That's why this double standard exists. Men are inherently physically stronger than women" Women are inherently better at manipulating people then men are. Does this mean that women should never manipulate people? Or use their…
/r/MensRights23/09/16 06:13 PM
3

That this is a terrible thing to do, to anyone. But why down-vote the OP? All he was doing was to bring this to light.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 01:42 PM
9

I thought that this was being reversed. I thought women could be drafted now.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 07:06 PM
2

And I'm almost positive that she doesn't get calculated into law figures if she isn't working in the law field either. What screws over the numbers is when you have paralegals (who let's face it, are generally women) who are working and are in the legal field. That completely screws up the numbers.
/r/MensRights19/09/16 05:58 PM
1

My first guess would be that most of your teachers of Women's Lib are older and come from a time where there was more of a patriarchy to fight against. For instance, women whom grew up in the 60's and 70's might be your university teachers for the subject when a Patriarchy meant more than it does today. My second guess? That the teachers in those classes are rehashing whatever they were told from when they went through the classes themselves. Because let's be honest, most people, both men and wo…
/r/MensRights15/09/16 07:38 PM
1

So as someone who has recently gone to a popular convention in Atlanta GA over labor day weekend, this rule about Cosplay is not consent has been told frequently by many people (and as a volunteer, I explain this to all the people who ask me)...that when they say this, they mean no touching unless you're told it's ok. For a while women had a problem where they would dress up in something provocative and people would just go up to them and hug them and touch them without permission and would gene…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:31 PM
2

I've seen the video before, but the thumbnail really hit home the fact to me that she seems like she wants bigger boobs and he is a person who is spending his first day on the streets. Neither really needing the money, but I digress (different topic for different day). That being said, I also understand the mentality behind it. Homelessness is a problem that most people choose to actively avoid because they feel like the person could have made different choices along the way to avoid it. They wo…
/r/MensRights08/09/16 04:22 PM
13

So maybe I'm an oddball here, but if they are truly fighting for equality for both genders, what does it matter what they call themselves? The thing is they need to do what they say. For instance, if they believe that both men and women have issues, and they do things to help majority male and female causes, the term they call themselves shouldn't matter. Catholics used to say "People should know I'm a christian, by what I do, not what I say." If she's good people, she's good people. Now if she'…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:58 PM
1

And while I would agree that moments before it happens does not classify as consent, we also know how a males track record stands up in a courtroom when fighting for our rights.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 07:50 PM
2

Upshot - if you are a woman, it is OK to hit people, and nobody questions you. Actually studies have shown that people tend to assume the male is at fault for most instances where violence has occurred. And you can validate this by watching most every video, if people see female on male violence, they automatically assume the male did something to instigate it and has just pushed the woman to her breaking point.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 05:19 PM
3

Just so long as men have the right to be deadbeats and not accept responsibility for their own child. First off, I've been lead to believe that men are deadbeats as much as women when it comes to the raising of children. Most men pay nothing for child support, or only pay part...but the same could be said in reverse. And for as many fathers you have out there that don't do enough for the kids, you have women who spend money on themselves. But Secondly (and more importantly), what about those cas…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:52 PM
3

Well, as it stands right now, he has the legal right to pay back taxes and pay until the child is of age. The big issue I have with male abortion only within the first 18 weeks is what happens when a woman waits until a minute to midnight before announcing to the male that it's a thing? I can just see it now... W: I'm pregnant. M: When did this happen? W: Well as of right now, 18 weeks ago. M: Well, I don't want to be the father. W: Should have said something before I finished saying pregnant, b…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 01:43 PM
2

Oh, just you try calling a sane woman crazy. You'll see how much she dislikes your statement. But no, most people don't care about being called dumb. It's when you make them feel unintelligent that it upsets most people, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 03:43 PM
5

Don't you know? PTSD is Patriarchy Traumatic Stress Disorder
/r/MensRights16/08/16 02:06 PM
–

I wonder if this will be on youtube as well. And if for some reason I'm working late at work and am driving home during the AMA, can someone please ask her where we can get those Wage myth buttons?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 07:38 PM
1

I kinda hope it will be on youtube as well.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 03:16 PM
1

I don't find it remarkable at all. Most of the time when you have a male and female debating each other about inequality a woman brings up something that makes the male feel bad (Such as rape, lesser pay, crap that happened in the past) and it works. People are built to be generally good people and have some varying degree of empathy. So we let them have their way. We concede ground. We let them have a little bit because in some deep small part of us we feel bad for what has happened to them. Th…
/r/MensRights27/07/16 07:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter