TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

iriedashur Archive

View 0 posts and 115 comments by iriedashur on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Y'know what, your counter example did make me think more, and your general analysis that women are often seen as less capable and men as more capable I think is true (and are 2 sides of the same sexism coin). I think my "final take" on the whole man vs. bear thing is that many men fail to realize how deeply "fear of strange men" is instilled in women in society (my own parents regularly told me about news stories where a girl/woman had been horrifically kidnapped/abused every time I spoke to the…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:44 AM
1

Honestly, I think the question says more about whether that woman assumes a worst-case scenario is a likely scenario. In the most likely scenario where I encounter a man in the woods, he's a normal dude and nothing bad happens. In the most likely scenario where I encounter a bear, I run away and nothing happens either. Doesn't really matter either way. However in the worst-case scenario for each encounter, the bear mauls me and eats me alive, leaving me somewhat intact and I die slowly over the …
/r/MensRights03/01/26 03:58 AM
1

Is that really true though? Most men I've talked to want to be in committed relationships, same as most women. Sure, maybe they don't all want to get legally married, but I'm skeptical that most men just want to hook up for the rest of their lives instead of settling down
/r/MensRights11/02/25 03:01 PM
1

Wait, how are men the gatekeepers of relationships any more than women? Don't both sexes choose who they commit to and if the juice is worth the squeeze?
/r/MensRights11/02/25 06:24 AM
1

I didn't say that feminism had no part in those perceptions, I said that feminism and men's interests/rights are not the dichotomy they're so often made out to be. Gains for women are not always/don't have to be losses for men. I'm not denying that there have been over corrections, but I also think that decrying feminism isn't the way to go. Idk, maybe I'm too attached to an older definition of feminism and the term has evolved beyond what I view it to mean. I think multiple things can be true a…
/r/MensRights06/02/25 06:12 AM
1

Yes, maybe there are inherently differences in interests due to gender, but I don't think we actually know that, or to what extent it's true, and we know that at least some of it is arbitrary. Yes, males and females are exposed to different hormones in the womb, but pre-puberty, hormone levels in girls vs boys are equal, and therefore cannot create behavioral differences along gendered lines. Hormones levels increasing/changing is what causes puberty. Leaving aside the fact that the subject at h…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 05:09 PM
1

It's changed in recent years, so I'm not sure I'd be willing to call it more/less patriarchal, but I'd err on the side of saying it used to be more. Now there's a greater perception of men as predators and there's less of an emphasis on men's positive qualities. I think men are also held to higher standards when it comes to gender roles. Women aren't judged as hard for being "masculine," but men are judged for being "feminine." From reading old books and historical letters, it seems like the nor…
/r/MensRights05/02/25 04:59 PM
1

Yes, I know that many suffragettes were extremely racist. Doesn't mean what they were advocating for wasn't equality in some regards. Politicians are all corrupt, thought leaders are no different. I don't believe women are ontologically "good," please just read what I've written and don't assume what I believe. I'm also legitimately not sure how Title VII reduced access to jobs and status for black people, can you explain that one?
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:39 PM
1

My argument is literally the opposite of "girls are smarter than boys???" My argument is that there's no inherent difference in learning ability/style between girls and boys, it's stereotypes and negative socialization that's leading to the gap
/r/MensRights05/02/25 03:25 PM
1

It's a combination of things, but the difference in socialization between boys and girls is one factor.
/r/MensRights05/02/25 05:24 AM
-1

Your source is a YouTube video that quotes a mere 3 early feminist leaders and decides that that describes the whole movement. Also, when the main goal of a movement is explicitly "the equal right the vote," pretty sure that's a movement for equality
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:41 PM
1

Glad to hear that Sommers isn't as radical as I thought! Yes, Solanas was a misandrist, etc etc, though I must again point out that it seems unfair to judge 1960s feminist, who were living in an objectively unequal society, for resenting men when most of the men in this very subreddit are open about their resentment of women for the inequalities they face, such as in he court system. Though I'm still going to have trouble getting any scientific info from someone who collaborated with PragurU, ag…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 04:34 PM
1

...yes? And you think adults behaving in extremely gendered ways due to their own socialization doesn't affect that? There's no biology dictating that in the west, most little boys like blue and most little girls like pink. That's a behavior learned behavior easily changed by societal norms, especially given the fact that it was the reverse just ~150 years ago. Why is it so ludicrous to think that many other interests that fall along gendered lines are similarly arbitrary?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 04:14 PM
1

I am not saying that boys are the problem, I just want to make that clear. Children are pretty much molded by adults, and gender differences in education are caused by adults. I'm not familiar with Christia Hoff Summers' ideas, but I admit I'm skeptical. She collaborates with PragurU, a notoriously unscientific organization. She says that the feminist movement started going downhill in the 1960s, despite the fact that women didn't have the right to a) get their own credit cards (1974), not get f…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 10:41 AM
1

It does matter, because if it's not biological it can be changed through societal perception, as in my example with the perception of "gifted" children. You seem to be advocating that we set lower standards for boys because they're incapable of achieving on the same level as girls, instead of combating the negative stereotypes that created the situation in the first place. The idea that boys can only succeed in a "do it yourself" physical environment is inaccurate and ahistorical. School and lea…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:53 AM
1

So which is it? Is it biologically more difficult for boys to sit still than girls and therefore it honestly makes sense that they do worse at an activity that requires sitting still? Or is it a stereotype that's harmful to boys?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:41 AM
0

Higher energy levels, prefer physical activity and rough and tumble play as opposed to social games of social cues ghat girls naturally prefer. Learn through play and doing this rather than being told to sit and engage in rote memorization. The comment I originally replied to made the claim that boys find it more difficult to sit and do rote memorization
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:34 AM
0

...that doesn't address anything I said, but ok I guess? I guess it's just always seemed odd to me that on the one hand, so many people say there's a war on their gender and that they get stereotyped (I've heard this from men and women) and yet they'll also say those stereotypes are true? Like, these perceptions of men seem extremely damaging to men? As an analogy, there was a study where they told teachers that they were teaching classes of "gifted" kindergartners, but not to tell anyone becaus…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 09:25 AM
-2

It really is, so much more than we realize, and it starts before kids can even talk. For example, mothers judge how steep of a slope their toddlers can crawl up by gender at only eleven months source. Parents react to what their children do and shape their children's interests. Parents expect their sons to like blocks and their daughters to like dolls, so that's what most kids like. Boys will have more toys that encourage building, girls will have more toys that encourage caretaking. Of course k…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:53 AM
-2

I mean, if you lived in a society where you couldn't vote and had to stay married to someone you didn't hate because it would mean you'd be destitute, I think you'd be resentful as well? Hell, don't a lot of men on this subreddit complain about women for the 2nd reason? When you decry 1st wave feminism at a time when society was objectively extremely unequal it really weakens your arguments against feminism today
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:39 AM
1

Can you link one of these studies?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:36 AM
-2

I mean this is objectively false? Women literally couldn't didn't have the right to open their own bank accounts credit cards when my mom was born. Say what you want about the state of feminism today, but don't make ahistorical claims, it weakens your position
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:32 AM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:29 AM
0

Kids that young don't have inherent differences in energy levels or preferences for types of play. Their hormone levels, metabolisms, muscle density, etc, are all nearly identical. Before puberty, all those differences are due to socialization. Now in the short term, it's still an issue, because how children are socialized isn't going to change overnight, so I agree that something in our education systems has to change. There used to be more of a balance between physical play and do-it-yourself …
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:28 AM
1

Unfortunately, the education system has changed in the past few decades :( With the advent of No Child Left Behind, a greater emphasis was placed on standardized testing and therefore younger and younger kids were expected to spend more time on core classes and less time playing and being active. Socialization differences mean boys have more difficulty with the transition to school/sitting still and as you said, are nore likely to be viewed as disruptive and not as likely to be viewed as "schola…
/r/MensRights04/02/25 08:23 AM
2

That's so interesting, thank you for sharing!
/r/MensRights23/01/25 09:04 PM
1

If you have kids and they're there, you have a duty to them, man or woman, whether you wanted them or not, this is an insane take, of course children are owed time and attention from their parents
/r/MensRights13/01/25 06:07 AM
8

But in fiction "villain" is a character that fills a specific trope, and plays a certain part in the story. Jenny is not an antagonist, she's not framed as a villain in the story, and she also never has bad intentions towards Forrest. She's not malicious, villains are nearly always malicious (or insane). Jenny does not play that role in the story and she's also not intentionally hurting Forrest I feel like calling someone a "villain" is real life is different than them being a "villain" in a sto…
/r/MensRights17/10/24 11:47 PM
3

What will you do if you do end up having a severely disabled child though? The risk is never 0
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/24 02:32 AM
0

You're in high school, that's why. It's probably just your high school as well, or your region that thinks this, not everywhere. All of the opinions teenagers have extreme (including yours, sorry), and they care a lot about aesthetics. None of it really matters
/r/MensRights30/08/24 09:36 PM
0

No, it isn't, that's only the standard for desperate guys on forums like these. And it's usually only the standard they say they have, because they'll also say they wouldn't fuck an ugly woman
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:04 PM
0

Most people will accept being treated like trash, this isn't unique to women
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 07:00 PM
3

Where do you live/what kind of people do you hang out with? Are you somewhere that thinks women with a sex drive are abnormal/slutty? Cause then women will hide their sex drives so as not to be judged
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 06:58 PM
2

You do realize there are male sex workers as well, right? Have you ever studied women's cycles/hormones? There's literally a time of the month (ovulation) that women are hornier. Women have sex drives Also using the term "females" makes you sound like an incel or a Ferengi lol Starting to think you're a troll
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 06:57 PM
0

Men don't give it to all women though. Men also have standards
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/24 06:54 PM
2

men find around half or more of women attractive, women find less than 1/10 men attractive. Source? "The median age of marriage for both genders has gone up at the same rate." Right, women are now more likely to be in relationships with non-monogamous, attractive men, hence the term "situationship" Are you just saying that the women who aren't married are just in situationships or something? "Again, not true that women only care about genetics." Of course it is. Most of the men on here agree wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 02:36 AM
3

Not really. Like in the past, women are picking from their best options, and if women have magnitudes more options, they became magnitudes more picky. And they usually pick the same small percentage of guys. Explain to me how women have magnitudes more options now but men don't? The balance of genders (at least in the US, this isn't true in other countries) hasn't changed, it's still roughly 50/50 Like a year older, not 10-20 year solder dude lol Yes, generally 2 years older The median age of ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:41 AM
1

Women's dating went from a few men they met in high school and college and maybe work to every man in a 50 mile radius thanks to dating apps. THAT is what changed. THAT is what disqualifies most men from even dating at all, let alone having children. So did men? You also went from a smaller selection to a larger selection? The article you linked doesn't have any stats about fatherhood, only dating, and yes, those numbers can be depressing. I'm honestly not sure how different they would have been…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 01:20 AM
5

If having poor genetics disqualifies you, then it's not possible for "most men" to have poor genetics. Over 50% of men aged fifteen and over are fathers, and that number goes up to over 70% for ages 40-49. source
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:48 AM
8

Depends on what you're bad at? Poor people have relationships, ugly people have relationships, stupid people have relationships. How do they do that? Personality. Having a personality that others like will always be helpful/increase your odds, even if you're bad at other things
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 06:05 AM
-4

The UK is actually pretty transphobic, saying you're actually a woman wouldn't work there lol
/r/MensRights19/08/24 05:29 AM
2

It would be highly opposed of course, and I'm not sure what the best way to enforce it would be. More education is probably the solution, as it usually is
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:43 PM
2

Piercing baby girl's ears is very common in Latino cultures
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:42 PM
0

Nah, ear piercing for kids is fine if they can clearly communicate that they want their ears pierced. I got mine pierced at 9 after begging my parents for nearly a year, and after it was explained to me the care that would be involved. I do actually think I was old enough to consent to that, as it's a very basic procedure with very basic consequences. Complications are extremely rare, and even if complications happen, the worst that happens is you have to take the earrings out and maybe some ver…
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:34 PM
2

As infants, I agree. However, I got my ears pierced at 9 years old after I begged my parents to let me for nearly a year (I'm a woman). While yes, it's a permanent procedure, it's so minor and complications are so minor that I think it should be allowed if the child clearly wants to/consents, as I did.
/r/MensRights17/08/24 03:30 PM
3

Why do you assume that women always want relationships? Some want casual sex There's no such thing as "objective" matches. Everyone has different preferences
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 06:48 PM
-2

It largely wouldn't become universally available through taxpayer funding though, because it would still be funded through health insurance, and the majority of people aren't on government insurance. Of those that are, roughly half are on medicare because they're old. Only ~18% of Americans are on Medicaid. The bill Vance voted against isn't subsidizing IVF, it's requiring insurance plans that cover OBGYN services to also cover IVF. Also, men "pay more taxes" because women take care of the kids,…
/r/MensRights25/07/24 07:55 PM
-6

Can you show me where Jennifer Aniston says anything about single women? It's my question because your entire post is predicated on your belief that being a single mom through IVF is being pushed/something women want to do, when nothing of the sort is ever said
/r/MensRights25/07/24 07:06 PM
0

But Jennifer Aniston was doing IVF while married to Brad Pitt? They were doing it because he wanted to have kids (obviously she did as well), and they literally got divorced because the IVF didn't take. The scenario you're citing has nothing to do with not wanting to involve men. Most of the people doing IVF are heterosexual couples
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:50 PM
-2

Jennifer Aniston was literally married to Brad Pitt while she was trying IVF, he divorced her because he wanted children she couldn't provide. Literally nothing about this scenario is about her "not wanting a man"
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:48 PM
-1

Why do you think single women are the ones using IVF? Most people who use IVF are heterosexual couples
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:44 PM
-2

Do you have a source for that? Everything I'm reading says that they were close, Eartha Kitt lived close to her daughter her whole life and they spent a lot of time together. Are you thinking of someone else?
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:39 PM
2

She was married though? They had a daughter and got divorced after 4 years unfortunately, but she was hardly anti-marriage or children
/r/MensRights25/07/24 06:34 PM
3

Bro, Chinese emperors? You mean the society where women were routinely encouraged to break their own toes to fit beauty standards? That wasn't a sexist society?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:59 AM
3

What on earth is troll x or twox? I've literally never heard of this, go touch grass
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/24 04:56 AM
1

I'mI'm 99% sure you're a troll, so in your words, "just for future passerbys." You're words clearly demonstrate a lack of the type of thinking req'd to be a software engineer. If you actually have the qualif/job then it would only be because of dei & quotas. Let's look at the type of unfalsifiable statements OldGuy has made here. No True Scotsman fallacy, claiming that he has enough knowledge of a specific field to recognize who is/isn't in that field, while simultaneously claiming that anyone o…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 05:14 AM
1

How are you defining "built/maintained" then? You think only physical infrastructure counts, not the ideas that enable it? You think healthcare workers aren't essential for society? What do you mean "claims to be a software engineer?" I'm not gonna doxx myself to prove it, either you believe me or you don't. What, you gonna give me a silly CodeAcademy test? I don't get my worldviews from reality TV, sorry. If you think reality TV shows that are produced for entertained and manufactured to get th…
/r/MensRights22/07/24 02:55 AM
1

Sure! On flight software for the Apollo missions, radio frequency hopping, the discovery of radium, the discovery of DNA, creating malaria treatments (Artemisinin), the one-handed medical syringe, all the grunt work required for our healthcare system, the majority of childcare, the majority of teachers, the majority of veterinarians You seriously think if all women just vanished, society would continue functioning?
/r/MensRights21/07/24 02:07 PM
0

I mean, I don't think the guy was arguing very well either. "Everything was built by men" is just factually incorrect and shows you're already coming into the argument with a bias. She obviously also showed an extreme bias, ngl I wouldn't argue with either of them, they're both sexist dumbasses
/r/MensRights21/07/24 02:47 AM
1

Or people actually enjoy spending time with others??? Most people want long term relationships??? Why would someone looking for love fuck a guy and then leave, that makes no sense
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 11:04 PM
1

Most women care about personality and part of attraction is based on that. You're saying your level of attraction to someone has never changed based on their behavior? You've never had someone you thought was hot be an asshole and lose attraction? You've never had someone you didn't notice do something awesome/sexy and go "hey, wait a minute, they're hot?" Or do you just not interact with people in real life?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 11:01 PM
1

Bro that's literally not true. I'm engaged to a fat man he's also not 6' You know what I thought about when I was deciding whether or not to date him? His sense of humor, his kindness, his ambition, his world views, and a million other things. You've obviously never actually talked to women about their boyfriends and what they like about them There's also a huge difference between like, who a woman goes "wow he's got" about and who she actually wants to date. Yeah, leading men in movies are rare…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:58 PM
-1

See, this is exactly what we're talking about. You seem to think there's no difference between men "still needing to keep shooting their shit and putting themselves out there" and "guy at the gym who keeps bothering you." There is a difference between approaching a woman and continuing repeatedly after you've been rejected. Women aren't mad about the first one, were mad (and scared, frankly) about the second one. If men better learned to gauge when a woman has categorically rejected then, life i…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/24 10:51 PM
1

Sometimes they apologize, sometimes they get mad at me 😂
/r/MensRights17/07/24 03:23 PM
1

Yeah, it's pretty unfortunate and I tell people they're being sexist. It can be more nuanced when we talk about specific issues, but I have no tolerance for people just saying "I hate men"
/r/MensRights17/07/24 01:44 PM
1

Sup, I'm a feminist, AMA
/r/MensRights17/07/24 12:58 AM
12

You seem kinda like you're avoiding my questions Are you saying that femininity is cooperative, and therefore masculinity is non-cooperative? Ngl that makes no sense. If you actually interact with both genders I think you'll find that while men and women have different ways of communicating on average, neither is easier to work with than the other And again, why on earth would anyone want to work with someone who's explicitly difficult to work with?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 04:59 AM
22

Why on earth would anyone want to live with someone non-cooperative when the entire point of living together is to cooperate in building a life together? Why do you think being masculine inherently means being non-cooperative?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 02:59 AM
3

Sure but you're going the route of "women just shouldn't be feminine then" instead of "let's stop shaming femininity." If someone wants to be nurturing and care about their appearance, I don't think that's inherently bad. We shouldn't shame people for liking pink, pop music, or frilly dresses. There's 0 things inherently worse about these things, we only look down on them because they're associated with women. The solution isn't for women to eschew pink, it's for society to stop looking down on …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/24 02:57 AM
-1

Can you give examples of people who got killed by vigilantes based on women's feelings? (This isn't a "gotcha")
/r/MensRights18/06/24 01:46 AM
-2

A stranger getting an abortion doesn't affect me, a stranger attacking me does. Your analogy doesn't make sense. And yes, before you date someone, you should ensure that they're pro-life if you don't want them to get an abortion. The majority of that change has not come from men. Dismissing women's contributions to society is exactly why your valid points will be dismissed by women, because you've just stated that you see women as inherently less hardworking/valuable. Why would anyone listen to …
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:50 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:45 PM
2

Do men not also work on feelings?
/r/MensRights17/06/24 10:44 PM
1

Just wanted to pop in here to say I'm so sorry that happened to you. I know words from a stranger don't mean much, but I can't imagine how much pain you're in and how much it sucks for your family not to believe you. You say "I shouldn't have let it get to me," but I disagree, your family should believe you and be there for you. You deserve to talk about your experiences with the people closest to you
/r/MensRights11/06/24 02:12 PM
0

I'm curious, what unreasonable ideas did they have?
/r/MensRights23/05/24 11:02 PM
-2

Have any male rapists actually been castrated either though? The castration is only if he lives to be over 100 and released in parole, cause he basically got a life sentence. I can't find anything about castration actually being carried out in the US in recent memory
/r/MensRights28/04/24 11:44 PM
2

It's an elective procedure, technically. He chose it to have a chance at parole
/r/MensRights28/04/24 11:41 PM
5

??? I'm literally quoting from both the articles and the studies they cite. What takeaway did you get from the articles?
/r/MensRights19/03/24 09:24 PM
2

Did you? It says that the total rates of filicide are roughly equal for women and men (52% make perpetrators, 48% women), but that the rates are different depending on motive and age of the children. Newborns and infant deaths are more likely to be caused by women; older children are more likely to be killed by men. When women kill, it's more likely to be due to a psychotic break, an unwanted pregnancy, or a belief that they're sharing the child some kind of pain. When men kill, it's more likely…
/r/MensRights19/03/24 04:18 PM
1

It highly depends on how she views the situation as well. I read your other comments about her not thinking it's a big deal, and in that case, yeah, divorce.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:02 PM
1

Speaking as a woman, no, it's not normal. Yes, relationships have their ups and downs, sometimes there are rough patches, sometimes one partner hurts the other without thinking. That's normal. It's 100% NOT normal for your wife to accuse you of abusing your own daughter based solely on diaper rash, which is pretty common. Does she know how much she hurt you? Did she herself believe you actually did something, or did she think she should've mentioned something to the doctor "just in case" or some…
/r/MensRights13/03/24 02:42 AM
1

You're good man, it's easy to get heated when talking about things that matter to us, I know I've said some childish things too 😂 I'm a bit confused by your last sentence, sorry, are you saying that women need men but men don't need women? And this is obviously a super broad question, how do you define/know what's a men's role and what's a women's role?
/r/MensRights12/03/24 07:36 PM
1

Ah makes sense, punch cards are a lot 😂 What historical events have they been written into? (In a factual way, obviously things like Hamilton exist, but Hamilton is clearly fictional and isn't claiming anything about history)
/r/MensRights12/03/24 07:34 PM
1

I said literally nothing about women being superior, I don't believe women are superior. I was responding to a comment claiming that men are superior. Stop assuming that you know what others believe and start actually reading what they say
/r/MensRights12/03/24 07:32 PM
1

It makes sense that women programmers weren't credited 40 years ago, partially due to the fact they were often categorized as clerical workers, rather than technical workers. I'd recommend reading Hidden Figures, by Margot Lee Shetterly, and The Innovators, by Walter Isaacson. I'd also read this WIRED article about Margaret Hamilton. Funny enough, women's participation in computer science began to decline around when you were in school, this article about it is pretty interesting. Honestly we di…
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:50 AM
2

I thought the deleted comment where you called me a dirty skank was funnier :/
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:35 AM
1

They can't stand that men are better than them and have pretty much done everything.
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:35 AM
1

So, after the time period I specified?
/r/MensRights11/03/24 12:33 AM
-1

Alright, you must be a troll, no one's this moronic, excellent trolling my dude, thanks for the laugh 😂
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:37 PM
1

Please do some research on how the Apollo missions computers were programmed, or how the ENIAC was programmed, or how early programming even worked. And again, please refer to the list I posted. If these women were literally just typing what men dictated/wrote to them, they wouldn't be credited with the invention of these technologies. Also, if the men were doing the actual thinking, why wouldn't these companies literally just... teach them how to type instead of hiring a whole other person? Esp…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:32 PM
1

Anyone who actively wants to work in a coal mine is delusional, man or woman. And, just so we're clear, I believe work protections go hand in hand with feminism. I know it's not 1:1, but men are also hardly clamoring to be nurses who are also exposed to workplace hazards and have to wipe people's asses. Is it specifically letter bombs you're against, or violent forms of protest in general? If the latter, I hope you have a similarly dim view of all slave revolts, stonewall, the American revolutio…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 11:19 PM
1

Do you think that knowing how to program only requires knowing how to type? 😂
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:33 PM
1

So wait, are you telling me the sexist system hurt both men and women? I'm completely shocked I tell you, shocked! It's not like feminists have been pointing this out from the beginning. You do realize that men being accountable for their wives' debts and women not being able to open their own bank accounts are both directly tied to the idea that women shouldn't have their own finances, right? You also realize that the women were literally protesting to be held accountable for their own finances…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:26 PM
-5

I already get plenty of dick 😂, from a man much more intelligent than you. Claiming that 50% of the population doesn't contribute to society is moronic. Please tell me what facts I've avoided. I literally have no idea who built my house lmao
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:11 PM
1

You: men are so much smarter and better than women!! Also you: reading a few paragraphs is too hard and takes too long :( Alright, I'll condense it and a dumb it down. Historically, men and women worked equally hard, if you knew anything about history you'd know how difficult it was to maintain a house and create all of the goods used in every day life. As for computers, most computer programming was done by women before 1970. Several foundational programming languages, including Assembly, BASIC…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 10:07 PM
-4

I never said Bill Gates didn't contribute, I said a lot of women did. This information is insanely easy to find, and you'd also already know some of it if you actually worked in the computer science or computer engineering field like I do 😂 I challenge you to find anything false in this. Resistance to reading and learning new information is extremely mature of you
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:51 PM
1

Bro this information is so easy to find, and you'd also recognize a lot of it already if you had a computer engineering or computer science degree like I do 😂
/r/MensRights10/03/24 09:48 PM
-4

Just in case you're not a troll, because your facts are untrue and your opinions are ridiculous: For most of western history, it was literally illegal for a woman to own her own property, open her own bank account, vote, or have custody of her own children, etc. Women didn't have the right to open their own bank accounts in the US until 1974. Why the fuck would a woman choose to work outside the home when all the money might just go directly to her husband? Discriminating based on sex for employ…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 05:12 PM
19

If it's mid aged women it's not gen Z, to be fair
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:57 PM
5

That's fucked then. What happens when you ask women who it's different than FGM? It would be one thing if it was medically recommended by a doctor and he was pressured into it when there were other options, would still be messed up, but purely cosmetic? Wtfffff Is your bro ok? Does he still talk to your mom? Are you also male and you refused?
/r/MensRights28/02/24 06:34 PM
1

I mean yeah, I would say the same thing about women going overseas. As I understand it, it's less common, but still a problem. And again, it depends on the attitude of the person. People who say "I want to date someone younger from (insert country) because they're more submissive" is creepy, and it's something I've heard people saying
/r/MensRights19/02/24 09:13 PM
-1

I think it really depends on the type of women they're trying to meet, and why. When a guy says he wants to marry a barely-legal teenager so he can mold her into his perfect wife, that's creepy. If he just likes the culture or looks of the women there, meets one, and marries her, that's not creepy.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 04:37 PM
3

Get it in writing that they won't transfer you because you're a man, take that to an employment lawyer and see if you have a case
/r/MensRights12/02/24 09:51 PM
1

Dumb question, do karma points even matter after you have a few to get around the limit that some forums have? Do people look at others' karma points? I feel like people don't really get "Reddit Famous," they go to Twitter, insta, or tiktok for that. If karma points are only for personal satisfaction, there's not much point in gaming the system
/r/MensRights06/01/24 02:19 AM
4

How is it a disadvantage? Do you understand how marginal tax rates work? Making more money means you'll take home more money
/r/MensRights31/12/23 10:41 PM
3

I'm so sorry, not only that this happened to you, but that the people in your life that were supposed to be there for you, believe you, and support you let you down so completely. Men can be raped, and our society needs to realize and talk about it. I hope you find a woman who can see you for you and believe you, they do exist.
/r/MensRights04/12/23 04:46 PM
0

We don't know what he took as "thinking she can say whatever she likes to me" means though. Supposedly he and his friend approached her, not the other way around. Was she just telling them to get lost and leave her alone or was she actually being aggressive? Why was OP there if his friend was tryna chat her up? The way he describes it doesn't sound like they were having a conversation, it sounds like he butts into her and his friends' convo. This friend also mysteriously disappears as soon as an…
/r/MensRights23/05/23 12:26 AM
-1

I'm just saying he escalated the situation, and he doesn't make it clear what "being aggressive" and "arguing" were. He goes on about "thinking she can talk like that to me" and then says that he started engaging with her. Why didn't he walk away? Why didn't he ignore her? I'd say the same things if this were a woman. Also, it's wild that he says "if you were a man, this would be a fight." Meaning that if the other person were a man, OP would've escalated to physical violence first. I find it su…
/r/MensRights23/05/23 12:17 AM
-9

I feel like there's missing info here. What happened before she started to get aggressive? Why didn't you just stop engaging after she got hostile? Why would your friend still want to get with her after that? Not saying she wasn't sexist/racist, but getting in arguments with strangers in bars generally doesn't end well. What were you expecting to happen?
/r/MensRights22/05/23 05:59 AM
0

It's not "IF" the reform is a rumour, it is a rumour. Also, a fetus isn't a child. Are you against abortion in general or something? Abortion is currently illegal in Argentina fyi
/r/MensRights04/02/23 04:03 PM
2

According to this article (which I read using Google translate, but it works pretty damn well for Spanish -> English, so I'm confident in the translation), the judicial reform is a completely overblown falsehood. Apparently, in 2021 a magazine posted an article about feminist judicial reform, with various suggestions from various different organizations. Paula Litvachky was quoted in that article for something unrelated. (I can't find what it was, but it was apparently inconsequential). Another …
/r/MensRights04/02/23 03:02 AM
1

You do realize that any man can get out of paying child support by relinquishing all rights to the child, right? If they don't want to pay for or be involved with the child, they literally don't have to be
/r/MensRights06/07/22 10:36 PM
1

Not rights exactly, but I'd say they count as societal problems: Tampons, pads, menstrual cups, etc, are not classified as necessities. Men are not taxed on necessary toiletries as much as women are. More women die in car crashes because safety tests and dummies are calibrated for adult men. Women have worse side effects and less substantial results from medications as many are only tested on men. All of these are changing, thankfully, but they are legitimate things that affect people
/r/MensRights06/07/22 10:30 PM
1

Have you told her this? Why don't you divorce her?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 10:20 PM
1

Who is saying this?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 10:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter