TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

irishpunk87 Archive

View 5 posts and 117 comments by irishpunk87 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

There is plenty of evidence supporting my assertion that people who are obese are rarely if ever capable of maintaining significant weight loss (that would qualify as not being overweight) over a long period of time, even when following strict diet & exercise regimens (not the ones you're talking about who lie about the actual amount of food they eat or exercise they do). I could spend a couple of hours finding all of the sources, but I have better things to do with my time and reddit isn't a pe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 06:37 AM
2

Genetics are not the only biological factor, though they are in fact a factor (as I stated). Also still fails to explain why many (though not all) obese people still can't lose a lot of weight even when keeping up a strict diet & exercise regimen. Try again.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 06:08 AM
1

Any peer reviewed studies you'd like to cite, or do you prefer to rely on anecdotal evidence and personal feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:31 AM
1

They didn't need any convincing, I suspect most women would believe that regardless.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:28 AM
1

Exactly, the problem here is that 90%+ of women won't admit to this. They enjoy the hell out of their privilege and it would scare them shitless if they didn't have it, that's why they can't even entertain the thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:18 AM
4

Not all fat people are fat because of poor lifestyle choices. There has to be a genetic/biological basis to it. I'm a very fit 125 lb. guy, and even living an incredibly lazy lifestyle and not eating particularly healthy I never gain any weight at all, yet there's 300+ lb. people who bust their asses eating strict diets and doing intense exercise routines and only lose like 20-30 lbs. How do you explain this?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/19 05:12 AM
1

And I've stated that I'm not buying your "evidence," because if that were the case nobody would date men in modern society and healthy relationships wouldn't even exist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 07:03 AM
4

Lol not sure where all that came from. I was just hinting that maybe shallow women are attracted to shallow men, simple as that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 06:54 AM
8

NAWALT. In fact, MOST women aren't anything like that. Maybe it's just the kind of women who are interested in you. That should tell you something about yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 06:45 AM
1

Just because I find something disgusting doesn't necessarily mean it harms people. In any case, I'm not really defending it per se, I'm just saying there's no actual evidence that it harms people. If it's so bad then why does anyone date men now days, given that the majority of men watch porn? LOL 2% unicorn porn. Well I could PM you some links of non-disgusting porn, but I highly doubt you'd let me do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 06:37 AM
1

It’s not an overwhelming majority by any means. And most men do view women as sex objects... and a big cause of that is use of pornography because it almost always portrays women as such. This is just patently untrue, and you've already made up your mind about it so there's obviously no use trying to convince you otherwise. I'm disgusted by 98% of porn for precisely the reasons you give, but that's not the only kind of porn there is. There is also porn with real consenting adult couples who aren…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 05:08 AM
1

Well I disagree. I think you can get to trust someone in the course of months maybe, if you know their friends, family, reputation, etc. Life doesn't have to be messy and terrible things don't have to happen, it's just plain irrational to risk that just for sexual pleasure. I've never had things like that happen, nor have my close friends or family members. If you don't get involved with shitty people stuff like that just doesn't happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:25 AM
1

Among a certain percent of the population, sure. But if you read my comment I'm talking about the majority of people. No, the MAJORITY of people are not constantly going out having casual sex with randos all the time. Many people get that impression because that's the social group they hang around. I've known plenty of people like that, of course, but it's not the majority, according to both data and my own experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:20 AM
1

The overwhelming majority of people who watch porn are not addicted to it, don't need viagra, and don't view women as sexual objects. So how is porn harming them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 04:14 AM
1

Your body gets sugar from breaking down carbs, which is necessary for a healthy diet. You don't need added sugars say from candy or other foods. Again totally irrelevant and off topic. The vast majority of people watch porn and they're not addicted to it. If someone is not addicted to it, how specifically is it harmful to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 03:10 AM
1

Okay, then this question isn't even relevant to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 03:08 AM
1

That's not entirely true, but we're getting way beyond my point here, this is not a debate about nutrition lol. Let me ask you again: is there any evidence that watching non-exploitative porn is harmful to people?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 02:41 AM
1

So you expect and/or encourage people you know to be in unhealthy relationships, to manipulate each other, to practice unsafe sex, etc.?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 02:37 AM
1

Respect could be defined as treating others they way you want to be treated. I was not making a "passive-aggressive shamey remark," I'm not a regular on this sub (let alone reddit in general) so not aware of all the bs that goes on here, so my apologies. As far as trust goes, I'm talking about a girl who doesn't disclose relevant information (like whether she has a boyfriend, or has STDs, or what her intentions are in terms of a relationship, etc., just for some examples). A girl could be out to…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 02:32 AM
1

Well that's unfortunate.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 02:21 AM
1

I just don't get where OP is seeing these messages, that people "expect" and "encourage" strangers to only have sex in committed relationships. That's not what I said... go back and read my post. You're taking it far too literally. I'm not saying that people are supposed to follow all of those standards, I'm just saying at least one or more of them. Generally there is a societal expectation that people aren't running around having random unsafe sex with total strangers, right? Not that they're p…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:48 AM
1

I'm not making any claims about you, only you can know that for yourself. But based on what you've told me there doesn't seem to be any hypocrisy on your part, so you're evidently not the kind of person I'm trying to address here. To be blunt you don't seem like a socially well-adjusted person, I don't mean to be offensive. Trust & respect are pretty basic concepts when it comes to social relationships, so if you're having a hard time understanding those (which you evidently are) I'm afraid you …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:43 AM
1

Not my friends, but other people I know.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:34 AM
1

But what about trust, respect, and safe sex? You would have sex with someone who you didn't trust, who didn't respect you, and wouldn't practice safe sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 01:25 AM
1

Unfortunately there aren't any studies on this, that I know of. I'm just going based off of what I observe in other people's behavior. I should add that there are studies that show the majority of people have had casual sex before (or maybe about 50%, at least once), but I'm not aware of any on the exact percent of people who believe casual sex is wrong (or at least not preferable) or whether or not these are the same people.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 12:59 AM
1

So you don't expect this of your partners or kids?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 12:57 AM
1

So what evidence is there that watching non-exploitative porn is harmful to people? Honestly your sugar analogy is very poor, because sugar is actually necessary for a healthy diet in small amounts. It only becomes harmful in large amounts, I suppose you could argue the same for porn.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 12:54 AM
3

Generally speaking 5 or less is normal (if grading on the curve, so to speak), though will differ for age range (obviously younger will be lower). So I'd say more than 5 is high. Based on a Slate self-reporting survey years ago, it appears that about 43% of women and 56% of men have had more than 5 partners by ages 30-34.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 12:50 AM
1

Agree with the high n count thing, but watching porn is not a red flag. The vast majority of guys watch porn, and plenty of women do as well, are you saying that the vast majority of people are undate-able? To me personally, 98% of porn is fake and disgusting and I don't watch it, but if you're not sexually turned on by looking at hot naked people having non-exploitative sex with each other then you're either asexual or not human. Studies show that women do get sexually aroused when watching por…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/19 12:13 AM
3

You realize you're saying this about your own mother?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 03:43 AM
3

Maybe not the answer you're looking for, but IMO it's not the number but the circumstances that matters. Generally I think a green flag is anyone who has sex with someone that is caring, respectful, honest, trustworthy, etc., and someone they've known for a while (you have to know someone pretty well to build trust in them). The thing is there really aren't a whole lot of people in the world who have those qualities, sadly, and even fewer of them are single; so a relatively high n-count (maybe a…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/19 03:37 AM
4

It's not just fear, it's also a low-lying distrust and/or dislike of men. I can't speculate on what her motives may have been, but it seems sexism was certainly possible in this case. Hard to imagine even a crazy girl acting that way if it was a woman tapping her on the shoulder.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 11:29 AM
2

At your age there are actually still a decent number of virgin girls, probably even nonreligious ones. There's obviously not a "place" you can go to find virgin girls (outside of super conservative churches, but that has its own complications and doesn't sound like you're going that route, lol). I'd recommend just going through your existing social network: friends of friends, friends of family members, family members of friends, etc. and ask anyone if they know of a single girl your age who wou…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 11:23 AM
7

You were definitely not in the wrong, that bitch was crazy lol. But to answer your question, I think a significant portion, maybe even a majority, of women have a deep unconscious fear or distrust of men that is totally unjustified, and the example you gave appears to support that (including the fact that your own female friends can't come up with a justification for it). If it's OK for a girl to do it, it should be OK for a guy to do it, no exceptions; if not it's sexism, plain and simple.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/19 10:54 AM
1

Oh I'm sorry, I didn't know that by "approach" you meant "penetrate." So you mean I should just put my dick inside of any woman I happen to be interested in? Seems like a great idea lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 11:58 PM
1

Why would a man be interested in a woman who doesn't want him enough to approach him?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/19 11:28 PM
2

Fair enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 09:22 AM
–

So whats going to happen if only the guys you don't like approach you? What would you do then?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 07:19 AM
2

I'm not straw-manning, I'm simply misunderstanding what your position on this is. Are you red pill or not? And are red pills in favor of keeping women submissive or not?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:54 AM
3

Well I haven't been martyred so you are wrong lol. Having healthy self-respect is neither being narcissistic nor a doormat, there is a happy medium.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:51 AM
0

So keeping a woman submissive is "boundary setting"? I swear the more you people talk the more you prove OP right lol
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:46 AM
2

This is a false dichotomy, people are not anywhere near that simplistic. In any case you did not disprove my point. You said "nice guys" get ignored, but then how is it possible that some "nice guys" can attract large numbers of women?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:37 AM
1

That is not true at all. Caring empathetic guys attract caring empathetic girls, I've known many of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:32 AM
3

I think a disproportionately high percentage of them do, possibly not the majority though. You can tell a lot of them are a little sick in the head by the way they talk about women and relationships. They show no concern whatsoever for the quality of relationships, only quantity.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:21 AM
4

So how do you explain all the nice empathetic guys who women fawn over all the time? My dad was one of them and far from the only one. Never had to be a manipulative asshole to convince my mom to stay married to him for life. I've met many dozens of couples who are the same way.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:14 AM
2

No its not... how do you explain all of the non-narcissists who are successful with women then?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 03:09 AM
0

"Wife beating narcissistic sociopath" is by definition someone who is manipulative and violent. Maybe you should look up the meaning of words before you use them instead of making the ridiculous and false claim that I'm straw-manning you. That is exactly what you said and I quoted it directly. The whole RP ideology revolves around keeping women submissive which is literally manipulative behavior. Sociopaths may be a separate group, but you have to have a lack of empathy to be RP in the first pla…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 02:32 AM
4

If you're a macho wife beating narcissistic sociopath you never had problems with women So someone who has to manipulate or rape women in order to have sex with them doesn't have problems with women? Dude what on fucking earth is wrong with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 02:11 AM
7

I'm sure I haven't met many RPs in real life, but I doubt the majority of them are nerds. You might be thinking of those who try to follow their advice or attend their groups or whatever, but the ones who are actually successfully living/practicing the RP life seem to be the macho, wife-beater types who clearly have symptoms of ASPD/NPD. Those beta nerds you're talking about are the ones who try to follow their advice, fake confidence, and ultimately fail, probably because they don't have the sy…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/07/19 01:40 AM
1

Yeah I already addressed that and said it wouldn't be her fault in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 05:09 AM
1

No, what I'm saying is there is no direct correlation between number of active users and stock price. Stock prices increase or decrease for a myriad of reasons that are only loosely correlated with the number of users. An increase or decrease in the site's subscription price, for instance, can also affect stock price, as can many other factors like company scandals, financial health, etc. Those stats you mentioned need to be a lot more specific. Are those active users or not? You can be a paying…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 04:38 AM
1

Stock market performance has nothing whatsoever to do with the number of currently active users. The number of active users are unknown, except on a global scale (which isn't entirely helpful, lol). A couple years ago I did a Match.com search in every major urban area in the US with only a few criteria, I believe it was ages 20-45, bachelor's degree, and maybe one or two others (can't remember now). I took the total number of matches that came up and compared that to census data, and it ended up…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 03:54 AM
1

OP didn't list this as one of his options, and I wouldn't fault the woman in that case.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 03:04 AM
0

I'm not quite red pill, but I agree with them on some of these issues. Raped: why the hell did she not take the morning after pill or get an abortion? Who on earth wants their kid to have a rapist for a father? Totally inexcusable IMO. Manipulated: you'd have to be more specific here, manipulation can include lots of things. But generally self-respecting women would see the red flags and not end up with a manipulative guy in the first place. Widowed: I don't think RP's would consider this in the…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 02:42 AM
1

If you are a top 20% man with todays technology you can get just about any woman you want. This just can't possibly be true. In reality hardly anyone uses dating sites, maybe only 2% of the population has an active profile on any of them at any given time. Facebook would have the largest share of users, but I've never heard of anyone using it to date people (though they're supposedly rolling out a dating feature eventually). Also this says nothing about your personality. The majority of girls ar…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 01:56 AM
3

More difficult, for sure! I've probably met over 50 girls in the past 10 years, I don't think any of them were single during the time I knew them (except for a few who were like 10 years younger than me), but I wasn't interested in any of them anyway. I knew a few single girls back in my church days, some were real hotties, but saving their virginity for marriage, so that's obviously a no-go lol. Most of my friends hadn't had a girlfriend since high school, or even middle school. I've never had …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 01:28 AM
1

Lol no they absolutely do not. I said neither of them is well supported by evidence because reality is 100 times more complicated than they make it out to be, BP & RP are far too simplistic mindsets. I'd say each one is only correct about a few of the claims they make. Blackpill is a whole other animal. But, like I said, I will make a post specifically addressing that in the future once I gather all the evidence for it. I think it will make an interesting discussion.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 08:04 AM
1

No, not even close. Both viewpoints are overly simplistic and not well supported by evidence. After doing some more research I plan to make a post specifically addressing that evidence, but we're getting beyond the scope of this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 07:35 AM
4

This is getting a bit off topic here, but as a former christian turned atheist myself I'd say the "purple pill" is the real red pill, if you see where I'm going here. People rely almost solely on anecdotal evidence in these subreddits and blogs on relationships. When you look at the actual evidence (peer reviewed research and such), I think you find flaws with both red pill and blue pill thinking.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 04:50 AM
1

Because there are guys out there (like myself) who need romantic interest as a prerequisite for sex. Manipulative women feed on men like this because they have the ability to control them, they can't do that with emotionally shallow guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/19 12:04 AM
1

I didn't make any mention of attractiveness, as that is very subjective. I also disagree with the just world hypothesis. I'm merely addressing the nice guy vs. asshole dichotomy. People can keep saying that assholes get all the girls but I'm just not seeing the actual evidence for it, all people ever offer is anecdotes that are no more reliable than my own experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 11:08 PM
1

I don't agree with this. There are a huge variety of people in the world, and sure, some people are lying when they say this, but I hardly think it's the majority. I think it's just your social circle you're going off of. If you grew up with a bunch of nerds or religious guys (like I did) you'd probably have a totally different perspective on things. I think the problem is the good ones are just too damn hard to find these days, then people get desperate and go for the bad ones instead. I've pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:22 AM
1

We must be living in an alternate reality because everything you've said, though a popular belief, is completely disproven by overwhelming evidence and experience. I've met very few men who meet the latter criteria (the aggressive ones), and almost countless who meet the former. The dominant aggressive guys attract a particular kind of girl, normally one who has low self esteem, is immature, not very intelligent, etc. The nice caring guys get plenty of girls, even babes, and are the most likely …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 07:09 AM
1

Your theory makes sense, but I simply don't agree with you. As a 5'7", 125 lb. guy who has worked with literally hundreds of Samoan girls over the past 7 years (and yes, many have them have flirted with me), I do not believe this. My honest opinion is that either women are irrationally creeped out by or afraid of men, or that men are inappropriately aggressive in their flirtations with women. Since I've never been a woman though I can't claim to know which it is, I feel like it's most likely a c…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 06:52 AM
1

Best option is to always ask a friend or family member or highly trusted acquaintance if they know of someone who's a good match for you. Dating sites/apps are bad options in general because hardly anyone uses them (despite what their marketing teams might want you to believe). By my calculations, it seems that less than 5% of the population even has an active profile on any dating site/app at any given time. Actually, data suggests that there are many more single men than single women in every …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 06:36 AM
5

A "hoe" or "slut" I've always understood as someone who has low standards, doesn't build the necessary trust before becoming intimate with someone, and/or places sexual pleasure above the health and well-being of themselves and/or other people (e.g. not caring about the consequences of their sexual actions, cheating on their partner, complicit in someone else's cheating, puts themselves at risk of rape, STDs, unwanted pregnancies, etc.). "Sexual impulsivity" or "promiscuity" would be another way…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 06:18 AM
1

Yes (straight male here). For me it's the act that matters, not the person. I'm the kind of person who just generally doesn't like being flirted with, especially by random people I don't know, even if they're attractive women. I've had just about every type of person you can imagine flirt with me in some capacity, 98% of the time very subtle; but of the 2% of times it was overt, it made me uncomfortable or at least very skeptical whether it was a guy or girl, attractive or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/06/19 05:31 AM
2

OMG, just wow, LOL, I was totally not expecting that response! Well if you're okay with your gf sucking off your grandpa for drug money, uh, live and let live I guess, LOL!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/18 12:15 AM
1

I'll say this: if said sluttiness resulted in having a kid, I'd say that's pretty fucking permanent.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 05:30 PM
2

So if I slept with my girlfriend's mom and her sister and all of her best friends and maybe reached around for her grandpa once or twice (just in exchange for drugs, of course!), even if all of this happened years before we started dating, she shouldn't care about that at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 04:50 PM
2

It could matter depending on the context the sex happened in. Did she cheat? Did she fuck a homeless guy in exchange for crack? Did she fuck her uncle? Did she sleep with your best friend while she knew you were into her? These things matter to some people and would certainly apply to guys as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 04:35 PM
3

I'm from a "liberal stronghold," if you will, lol. It depends on how you define "slut." My views actually lean toward libertarian on social things, but even so I still think those who are more sexually conservative are that way because they have more self respect and don't think that every random dick deserves to enter her vagina. I think a healthy mindset is someone who saves sex only for those who care about them most and are honest/trustworthy/responsible people, but you are only likely to me…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 04:30 PM
1

Lol, I'd say in most cases it doesn't have to be that serious. Most sluts are probably just shallow or have low attachment. Though it is true that people may be slutty for having major mental issues, I can't tell you whether that is the majority or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 04:24 PM
1

You're going to get a lot of different answers for this one. I generally take a more logical approach to this and define a "slut" as someone who cares more about having sex than their own personal health/safety or other people's feelings. That would include cheaters, people who have sex too quickly (like before you could know your partner had mental issues or were a good/trustworthy person), and people with high N counts (even people who use contraceptives very diligently still end up getting ST…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 04:15 PM
2

I don't think they hate sluts. There's nothing really to reconcile here. Sure, there may be guys who disparage what they see as slutty behavior (like if a girl cheats on her partner or fucks her uncle or regularly goes to orgies or something), but generally they seem to be okay with women having consensual casual sex as long as they don't go overboard with it. I don't think they would call them sluts merely for having lots of casual sex, but who knows. I'm sure there's plenty of hypocrites out t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/18 03:48 PM
4

Why on earth would you want this? It's a dystopian nightmare. The birth rate should be declining not increasing (as it is in many highly developed countries), population growth at this point is actually environmentally unstable. Secondly you can't control people. Stupid people make stupid decisions no matter how you try to punish or incentivize them. A better approach is to make it easier for them to make smart decisions. And those who don't have kids for whatever reason have to give half their …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/18 08:01 AM
4

Never heard of the other two but Media Matters is a legit organization. They are not paying people to spread propaganda, it's right-wingers who spread propaganda to defame them.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/18 07:10 AM
1

It's impossible for anyone to answer this question because you can't experience both. Life is one-dimensional, it's not like the movie Groundhog Day when you can keep reliving the same day over and over again and experiment and try out different things. There will never be an insightful or useful answer to this question.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/18 06:36 AM
3

You, darling, are a unicorn.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/18 06:12 AM
1

I am not an SJW by any stretch of the imagination. I am also not asking for any "credit" for my ideas, I don't know where the hell you're getting that from. All I'm saying is that if there is some problem in society we should find ways to fix it, that's it. In order to do that we have to experiment, and I merely gave one example of something we should try, I never characterized it as a final solution. We found ways to solve segregation, we can find ways to get rid of the "casting couch." Our dis…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/18 02:36 AM
1

A man would only stay with a woman like that if he had horribly low self-esteem/self-respect, or maybe if he had serious mental issues himself. In that case I would guess maybe 15%. Unless this girl has been in intensive DBT therapy for years and has started to see some improvement, then probably closer to 30%, but from what I understand this is extremely rare for BPD patients.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 11:09 PM
2

I would speak with my mod team and we would all mutually agree to stop existing, maybe just make a limit on the amount of posts people can make to reduce spam and then just ghost. Let people say whatever the fuck they want, this is the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:49 PM
2

30 yo virgin here. Up until 21 it was for religious reasons, now I have virtually no sex drive so it doesn't bother me at all. I try to get myself mentally interested in sex but it goes nowhere, wouldn't be worth the effort to actually have sex with someone in real life. Although it is incredibly annoying when people look at you like you're a serial killer when you tell them (either that or just sheer and utter disbelief). It's like, dude, I literally haven't met any single women since I was 17.…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:44 PM
1

LOL omg here we go with the baiting, getting desperate here are we? Well it's pointless to have this conversation if you're going to continue to be entirely uncharitable to my point of view. My position hasn't changed at all, I just believe that decisions should be made democratically and job interviews shouldn't happen behind closed doors where only one person makes the decision. That's it. I said the particulars don't matter, as it would depend on the industry/type of business, but the basic p…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 10:15 PM
2

I'm always up for a challenge :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 08:12 AM
1

Well I'm really glad Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi didn't think your way. If everyone was like you we would still have Jim Crow and segregated schools and the British Raj and hell, maybe even chattel slavery. Nobody thought society was capable of transforming in a fundamental way, but it did, and it has, multiple times, all throughout human history. I'm not talking about doing something as monumental as getting rid of chattel slavery, I'm just talking about making job interviews open and not…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 07:57 AM
0

Technically you are right, but it's not that hard to find out whether someone is already in a relationship. Ask her friends/acquaintances, do your homework first. It's almost impossible to hide the fact that you're dating someone. There is still some responsibility for you to make sure she's a halfway decent person before you stick your dick in her; if you have good judgment, you'll be able to see it early on. In any case it's not going to stop her boyfriend from seeing things differently, and h…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 05:04 AM
5

Alright then, better hope it's not your girlfriend I'm fucking lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 04:49 AM
3

I think there can be a "lose" in this situation. I have a friend who had sex with a girl without knowing she had a boyfriend. They were walking down the street together one day and, lo and behold, bumped into her boyfriend who decked my friend in the face. I have too many stories to count about girls lying about having boyfriends.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 04:43 AM
2

Have you actually done this before? Did it work?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 04:10 AM
1

Your premise is invalid and not supported by evidence. "Alpha" and "beta" are not scientifically supported concepts with respect to human beings, they don't exist outside the idiosyncratic perceptions of incredibly shallow people. Even if "alphas" existed the premise that they should be valued over "betas" even to the point of killing betas is also unsupported (and wickedly immoral, I might add).
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 12:56 AM
2

I take issue with a lot of the things you say here. For one, what on earth makes you think people like Elliot Roger and Alek Minassian are being honest? I mean their premise is blatantly absurd: if women don't sleep with us we're going to go around shooting people for the hell of it. That is clear sociopathy, you're buying into their sociopathic bullshit and saying the solution is to have men sleep with women. No, you moron, that's probably just want they want you to believe. These individuals m…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/18 12:50 AM
1

Lol no its not. There are a lot of businesses that are run that way, they're called cooperatives, look them up. You are falsely assuming that businesses can only be owned or ran by one person. No, many businesses are founded by groups of people. You keep third parties objective via democracy. You appear to think it's perfectly okay for bosses to sleep with their employees, or maybe have some weird fantasy about it yourself, as you're not even bothering to put any effort into finding solutions. J…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/18 11:43 PM
1

That's just not true. There are very easy ways of getting around this: just don't let a single person decide whether someone gets a job or not, and don't make job interviews happen behind closed doors where no one knows what's going on. Let it be a democratic decision. Done. That's not a fantasy world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/18 08:26 AM
1

Yeah, and again, the overwhelming majority of people just aren't that shallow. Maybe we occupy different universes, but where I'm from even if you're just trying to get laid being a good person is a baseline requirement. Being physically fit is not, though it certainly can help.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/18 02:03 AM
1

You can be healthy and be a good person. I know... but I'm saying the "healthy" portion should have nothing whatsoever to do with how much respect a person gets. That shouldn't even be a factor or even enter into the equation, only their personality should matter. Would you not respect an unhealthy good person equally as much as a healthy good person?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 11:10 PM
2

Yeah but the point is they shouldn't have to sleep with somebody in order to get their big break. Are you defending this or something? I'll agree that many women probably do this willingly, but the point is they shouldn't. They are part of the problem, because every other woman will have to do the same (willingly or not) to achieve the same success, and that is wrong. I hate how modern culture thinks any decision made consensually by an individual should be worshiped as independence and not chal…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:58 PM
1

Sorry for giving a cliché answer but I would like to think that society is nowhere near that shallow. I do not choose to like or respect people based on how they look at all, nor does anyone else I know for that matter, not sure what kind of world you're living in. Where I come from being a good person who is kind, courteous, and helpful to other people is worth 1,000 times more than physical fitness.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/18 10:31 PM
2

It's not rape, it's surprise sex! ...right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 05:03 AM
1

It's supposed to mean who are the hottest 1% of people to you personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 05:00 AM
2

Smoking hot AND a non-shit personality is less common than one might suspect. LOL goddamn, is that ever true!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/18 01:17 AM
1

I'm a guy. I guess my standards are "unreasonably high" because I want a girl who is attractive, single, and a good person. It seems that no such person exists lol
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 12:44 PM
1

It sounds like you're just having sex with a lot of shitty guys. Maybe you should raise your standards and maybe consider not having casual sex, since those are always the risks you take when having sex outside of a relationship. As for me (a guy btw), this is why I just don't have casual sex. I'd get a vasectomy first and never stick my dick in someone until I got to know them very well over the course of several months. Make sure we're a good match for each other, respect each other, friends &…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/18 04:58 AM
1

It is a sacrifice in my eyes because in an ideal world both parents should be working what we consider "part time" (perhaps 15-20 hrs a week) and making enough on that amount of hours to take care of their family. Both men and women should, ideally, be able to spend a relatively equal amount of time in work, education, and child rearing. It's just that our current society/economy forces people into inflexible work arrangements because it makes things much easier and more convenient for business …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/18 01:09 AM
1

I think for most people, including myself, personality is actually more important than looks. If a woman has an amazing body but a horrible personality she is disgusting to me; if a girl is average or even a little on the chubby side but has a really fun, cool, interesting personality she would be hot to me. Secondly, obviously not all people find the same things attractive. I've heard girls say they find guys with beer bellies to be sexy, or guys who like big women. Yeah, people are on average …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/18 10:37 AM
2

Honestly, it totally depends on what social circles you run in. Of course it's going to be stigmatized among the religious or older people in general. For people in their 20s - 30s who aren't religious it doesn't seem to be stigmatized at all, in fact if anything it's encouraged. But again it all just comes down to everyone's personal opinion. Personally I don't think there's anything unethical about casual sex in and of itself, but there are real risks involved that younger people especially of…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 10:25 PM
1

It certainly could and probably does in most cases, but the point is it's not a guarantee and wouldn't always manifest itself as "craziness."
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 10:31 AM
1

They are not scientifically valid concepts with respect to homo sapiens. There is no scientific research to my knowledge that even supports the "4 combos" model that TRP's are listing in the comments. They are an incredibly shallow and simplistic way of categorizing humans, who in their individual selves are highly complex and all have a combination of different "alpha" and "beta" traits, as perceived by others. The terms probably have no use outside of those perceptions, i.e. in real-life situa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 10:26 AM
2

Thank you for this, totally spot-on.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 10:22 AM
1

Obviously there is no guaranteed way for every individual person, but statistics can certainly show who is "most likely" in a given population. There has actually been some interesting scientific research on this that supports some of these "slut tells." Women who have lots of guy friends - this is supported in a study called "women reject sexually promiscuous peers when making friends." Of course this is not to say that ALL women who have lots of guy friends are cheaters or have high N counts, …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 10:17 AM
1

No, a tranny who's a 9 on the hot scale is a contradiction lol (I mean, unless you're a guy who's into masculine chicks, but most of them aren't), 1 on the crazy is not. Transgender people aren't "crazy" or even gender dysphoric or anything like that, they just have either a masculine body with highly feminized brains or feminine body with highly masculine brain which is caused by unusual hormone exposure while in the mother's womb. There have been scientific studies that confirm this.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 09:43 AM
1

Lol you know this from experience, presumably?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 09:31 AM
1

TBH if I met a girl like you in real life I'd probably want to date you in a heartbeat, sounds almost like a dream girl to me. Never understood guys who like what you describe as the "conflict of feminine energy" or submissiveness or motherliness, those traits actually turn me off immediately believe it or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 09:29 AM
1

Meeeeeeeeh, yes and no. I wouldn't agree with all of the particular criteria you list there. Sex drive - don't care honestly, I don't have much of a sex drive myself. Male interests - HELLLLS YES. Male communication style - HELLLS YES. Not very emotional - HELLLLS YES. Interested in makeup, hair, etc. - actually for me NO. I want a girl who is naturally beautiful and just doesn't give a flying fuck what she looks like, even the faintest hint of vanity or overly caring about her looks is a major …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 09:22 AM
1

At this point in my life it's definitely unusually low libido, earlier in life it was more for religious reasons. But yes, definitely not valuing/pursuing sex that much either. I don't think it's healthy for sex to be valued/pursued as much as it is. It's not that I'm maladaptive sexually, I think it's that an unusually large percentage of people now days seem to be maladaptive socially, they're just not taught how to have really close, healthy relationships with other people. If you have health…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/18 08:39 AM
1

Even though almost nobody seems to be taking my side on this one, I'm fully convinced I'm right about this. IT ALL DEPENDS ON WHAT KIND OF PEOPLE YOU WANT TO DATE. The overwhelming majority of women prefer men who have lower n counts because to them it means this is a guy who has self respect and self discipline and is capable of being a trustworthy and faithful partner. Maybe the majority of women are mistaken in thinking this (though I don't think they are, but that's a whole other topic and I…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 09:18 AM
1

From my experience as a 30 yo virgin, I've never had this strong urge to have sex or ever felt "sexually frustrated," and I definitely don't feel like I'm lonely or emotionally off or anything like that because of it. Maybe I'm just a freaky weirdo, or maybe it's just because I have lots of great friends and family that I've been close to over the years. Whether casual sex is beneficial or not I think depends on your relationships with other people. For me I think time is much better spent havin…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/18 09:12 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter