TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ironman3112 Archive

View 0 posts and 63 comments by ironman3112 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

STOP BLAMING YOURSELF. Why do you say it was your fault? Why do you call yourself promiscuous ? If anything both of you are 'guilty' of going for unprotected sex and being 'promiscuous'? It's important to not dwell on ones actions forever - but it's entirely rational and probably necessary to recognize that one had a choice in what they chose to do. How else is someone going to learn from being in a situation like this? Or pass what they've learned onto someone else later on in life?
/r/MensRights06/02/24 12:45 AM
0

The biological purpose of sex is to create a child. We can do whatever we can to prevent that from happening - but at the end of the day if you're performing the biological function - you're doing the exact thing to conceive a child and that's always a possibility.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 11:36 PM
0

who am I meant to be loyal to? my stolen dna lol You're warped in the head if you think willingly performing a biological act that's literal purpose is to create a child is somehow stealing your DNA. Everyone has a duty to care for their children that they create.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 03:04 PM
-1

Probably teenagers who haven't actually had the time to think about what a society would be like where people could en masse abandon their children. News flash - not a good one.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:40 AM
0

Edgy - try to have an original thought for once and try not to be such a goof. Imagine thinking that abandoning your child is a sane and logical choice. People like you and the ideology you espouse is the reason why our society is going down the shitter. No sense of duty, loyalty, obligation - just in it to win it for yourself. Great.
/r/MensRights26/11/22 01:38 AM
-7

no and fuck no, keep your baby that you betrayed me over wanting to keep and fuck of How is not wanting to terminate your child a betrayal? If you're not ready to deal with a pregnancy - don't have sex. It's that simple. Abortion due to its complications should not be used as a form of birth control.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 01:10 PM
-8

If you have sex you need to be ready to deal with the consequences of a baby. That’s all there is to it. This is a really simple concept yet you'll be downvoted because most people here want consequence free sex - even though that's literally not possible. Having to get an abortion and terminate your child or raise your child are some of the potential outcomes of having sex - that is the risk that occurs. People don't like hearing this though - as if consenting to sex means you don't consent to …
/r/MensRights25/11/22 01:09 PM
1

you're right - its impossible - don't even bother trying. The only thing one can do is to not commit to a long term relationship. You probably wouldn't even like it anyways - its not so great - being in a committed relationship where both people work as a team. It's pretty terrible really.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:03 PM
0

Immediately downvote me - nice. Also - that hasn't been my experience as a married man. Maybe I married the 'unicorn'.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:46 AM
-4

It's called having a head on your shoulders and picking right.
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:45 AM
-5

Why do you say that?
/r/MensRights07/08/22 01:44 AM
-4

The point is to find someone you're compatible with - and you're not going to have this problem.
/r/MensRights06/08/22 08:41 PM
3

You claim to be "pro life" yet are happy to murder actually living humans. Perhaps YOU shoulf think about my example for longer than 5 seconds. I'm giving an example - I live in Canada - death penalty has been gone here since the 80s. I'm not a pro death penalty person but can see the differences between executing a convicted criminal who has hurt people and terminating an innocent human life. You're entire rant is side stepped by the fact I'm not pro death penalty. You just made an assumption a…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:48 PM
7

If you believe a fetus must have life, then an actuall living human must also have the right to life, surely? Did the fetus kill or rape anyone? Commit some sort of a crime? Those are the types of instances where the death penalty is applied. Think about your example for longer than 5 seconds.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 10:39 PM
3

In Canada you can still be found to be common law with separate places. Depends on how often you stay at each others places and the nature of the stays. At least in ontario, check out this link.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:40 PM
1

Eh there is still common law that can come into effect with a break up if you've lived together long enough.
/r/MensRights17/07/17 10:37 PM
1

women are biologically weaker than us etc. and that we have biological differences I don't see how biological differences immediately translates to one gender being disposable, you're making a leap in logic there.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 11:52 AM
6

This isn't necessary at all. Let's stop labelling things as manspreading/womanspreading, especially here as this person isn't doing anything wrong.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 10:14 PM
3

I don't think you understand what a libertarian is. They usually want smaller government, not larger.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 11:40 AM
65

you forgot the /s? The 1950's are over, it's rather difficult to live off of one parent's income alone.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 03:09 PM
1

" I never argued for pointlessly spanking a child, repeatedly I have stated that you should explain your reasoning." I've looked through your replies to me and you have not stated this. You've said that spanking is sometimes necessary to discipline a child from what I've gathered. Neither of us have dove into the topic of making sure the child knows why they're being spanked. However as you've stated you do bring up a good point about the article's lack of critical thinking. "I want Peer review …
/r/MensRights15/01/15 06:36 PM
1

The proof is with the video I sent you earlier. I can also link you to the sources used in the video. Spanking is harmful for kids intelligence: http://www.themoneytimes.com/node/85300 Toddlers that are spanked tend to be more aggressive: http://health.usnews.com/health-news/family-health/brain-and-behavior/articles/2009/09/15/early-spankings-make-for-aggressive-toddlers Children that are spanked have lower IQ's: http://www.unh.edu/news/cj_nr/2009/sept/lw25straus.cfm The Fallacies of Pro-Spankin…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 11:42 PM
1

You have no proof for anything you say, humanity has had countless generations raised with parents who spank their children conservatively. That's a fact, yes, but it doesn't refute anything I'm trying to say. We have also had countless generations raised to smoke, to accept slavery etc. The fact that slavery had been practiced for thousands of years and generations were brought up to accept it, doesn't make it right. We have also had countless generation raised to wage war.Wars have been waged …
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:47 PM
1

"An adult who starts knocking things over in a store get's thrown out likely by the police most likely using force". He would be restrained and taken out of the store, either by police or the store owners. I'd imagine that the store owners would be allowed to try to restrain the man using reasonable force. The difference between a man doing that and a child is that if a child was doing that to the store it wouldn't take too much to restrain a child, thus, calling the police isn't really warrante…
/r/MensRights13/01/15 11:27 PM
1

"We're talking about a smack on the hand or the butt. We're not beating people with sticks here. You're being more than a little melodramatic." eh it's different from person to person what is seen as justified. In a legal sense it is battery if you did the exact same thing to an adult. "Again irrelevant, there is no need to defend yourself from a smack on the hand or the butt. We're not talking about being beaten or strangled." -I would disagree, because at that point you are being battered, I w…
/r/MensRights12/01/15 07:39 PM
0

Yeah I agree with that there. Now, we have established that it is wrong to hit your spouse when they do something stupid, a spouse whom is a fully grown adult, knows what is right and wrong and has the possibility to defend them self if attacked or remove themselves from the situation and get help. Now, why would it be acceptable to hit a child if you cannot hit your spouse? A child is 100% dependent on their parent for support. A child cannot escape their parent to get help, cannot defend them …
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:35 PM
0

Alright I'll try to break down what I believe the argument being made is if you'd be willing to play along with me. Now, I would say that, in general, it is absolutely unacceptable to hit a spouse. Would you agree with that statement?
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:19 PM
1

because that's exactly what was said right? Quite the straw man you've built up there.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 06:10 PM
1

I think it's incredibly odd/hypocritical when violence is supported to keep children in line via hitting or spanking them on one hand, while violence against spouses and adults in general is condemned. I'm not saying you support using capital punishment with children, just a thought I had while reading your post.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:58 PM
1

He left his home because his wife attacked him, told him to leave and he can't really defend himself in his current state. It may not have been the wisest move but it's not a bone head stupid decision. It's easy to sit here and call him a moron without considering the circumstances and what he's going through.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 05:43 PM
2

They were not targeted for being boys. They were targeted for being the sons of soldiers. TIL boys != sons.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 02:29 PM
2

uh...she is the perfect troll??
/r/MensRights22/10/14 02:56 AM
1

True enough, but it almost seems as if taking both the boys/girls and teaching them both that violence isn't the answer would be easier. As they've both been subject to the same environment.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 11:48 AM
3

I wonder if there is a similar program set up for one girls. One that targets a similar demographic and teaches them that violence isn't the answer. It would also have to try to change their attitude towards school yard jokes about boys.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 12:49 PM
1

Larry Miller, my MP voted yea so I'm surprised and glad he did. I'll phone him or email him to congratulate him and hope he gets another shot at it.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 09:36 PM
23

He was out to kill men, from what I understand he despised them for succeeding where he had failed. If he was just out to kill women, why would he have killed his roommates whom were male? As well from the looks of it, you just made this account to come and troll this sub. You made your account 1 hour ago...
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:24 PM
15

If I remember correctly, 4 men were killed. He wasn't just gunning for women.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 02:55 PM
8

What did your girlfriend have to say about the whole thing?
/r/MensRights13/05/14 01:17 AM
2

Every player is going to be evaluated as a football player to see if they have what the team needs to succeed. If he doesnt then I wonder what kind of a response the team will get if they cut him, and if the possibility of a backlash will influence their decision to cut/keep him.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 12:28 PM
1

Very good question, I'm interested to hear his rebuttal.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:37 PM
1

Can you link to the articles that have actually mentioned this happening? I've been watching the news and the 300 girls being kidnapped is brought up regularly by CBC, but nothing about men/boys being set on fire. I've been waiting to hear if they'd mention what happened to the boys, whether they were just released or something else happened to them when the girls were taken.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:08 PM
1

This is actually nice to see, thanks for sharing!
/r/MensRights08/05/14 02:02 AM
1

Apparently he doesn't as he claims to be in a loving, caring relationship with a woman.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:27 AM
2

I can agree with this here, thanks for the response and interesting discussion.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 12:17 AM
2

"I can't, though. I can't answer that without bringing a child into it because, my the nature of the question, there is a child involved, and the needs of children trump the wants of parents. It won't encourage responsibility, as the number of women deliberately tricking or going against their partner's will is much lower than the number of just plain accidents, something the author of the link in a previous comment says doesn't exists. It does. Accidents are real. We are sexual, pleasure-driven…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:49 PM
2

"then not only do kids of deadbeats grow up without a father, they have a signed, legal document saying their dad disowned them" If a woman is pregnant, and decides to have the child anyways knowing full well that she will have to shoulder the responsibility of that child without a man, then that is her decision. The same would apply for a man whom wants a woman to keep the child, and is willing to do it without her help. How is this not fair between both parties? Answer me that without bringing…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 11:37 PM
2

So a man not wanting anything to do with a pregnancy is a deadbeat? While a woman not wanting anything to do with a pregnancy and getting an abortion is what exactly? You're blaming men for not wanting to deal with the consequences of their actions, but when a measure could be put in place to make women more accountable for their actions you shout it down? Now I understand getting an abortion isn't easy, and that it is probably a rather traumatic experience, but so is being financially chained t…
/r/MensRights28/04/14 09:10 PM
1

You're making several assumptions there. I would be naive to think that I'd be able to change something of this magnitude simply by commenting on reddit. Knowing this, what you're assuming is my goal, is not what I'm really trying to do. I know for a fact that I wont change much by discussing this subject here, but that doesn't make the topic any less interesting to discuss in my opinion. Honestly, I just read your comments, disagreed and figured I'd share how I thought. I'm not on a mission to …
/r/MensRights28/04/14 08:00 PM
1

I'm not trying to fight, I'm just trying to have a discussion about this issue here. I don't need to convince anyone of anything, I'm just genuinely interested in having a conversation about the topic at hand.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:46 PM
2

" If financial abortion became a widespread thing, we'd end up with a generation of children filled with abosulte loathing toward their "sperm donors" riddled with emotional issues" This doesn't make any sense, if financial abortion became a widespread thing, there wouldn't be kids in these situations as they would have been aborted.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 07:03 PM
2

so it should just be entirely lumped onto men the way it currently is? If a woman has sex, she does so knowing that she wont have to look after a child for the next 18 years. If a man has sex, he does not have that same assurance.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 06:51 PM
4

Currently when a man objects to paying child support for a kid he doesn't want, he is typically told "well you shouldn't have had sex" or that he should have thought about the consequences for his action. So men are already expected to think about these things beforehand.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:42 PM
2

Alright well I can't really argue with anything there other than maybe point 2), Living in Canada I do not believe that the courts here would shut down a legitimate rape. Other than that though I feel as if we've covered everything. I'd just like to thank you for taking the time to have a civil discussion with me, I always enjoy hearing other people's views on important issues. Unless there's anything else you'd like to discuss or ask me this'll be my last post, with that in mind good luck with …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 04:12 AM
2

1) It was just hypothetical, I know she wont accuse me of rape, but the issue is that it could be presented that way. My apologies for not making that clearer. 2) If you're accused of rape I'd say your situation is permanently tarnished. So I wouldn't go so far as to call one lucky for being accused of rape and exonerated from charges. 3) This is my personal opinion, but I doubt that if I argued that as my defense, that it would hold up in court in front of a jury. I'll just reiterate myself one…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:35 AM
2

Yes I can understand where you're coming from. Now, I'll explain where I'm coming from. I've dated my girlfriend for 3 and a half years. It has reached a point where If I want to have sex, all I need to do is give her a condom and she can do whatever she wants with it. If this leads to sex then under that legal definition this would be rape as I haven't explicitly gotten a yes from her, and could be viewed as pressuring her into having sex with me, when that isn't the case. Now I know she won't …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:46 AM
2

I don't know who you mean by "you guys", as the only person I've been talking to here is you. What other people say doesn't represent what I think, I just went over that. As well, the situation I described earlier is far from far fetched, it happens regularly. I don't think that foreplay, leading to sex without explicitly saying "fuck me " or "yes let's have sex" is far fetched. That's just something we will have to disagree with as you don't seem to be willing to accept that. "I'm trying to sho…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:10 AM
4

Well then you can see the problem with your definition. I'm moderately confused as to what you're referring to with the second paragraph, but it seems as if you're just grasping for straws now. I never claimed to be an MRA, and even if I do, what other people whom I don't even know say about rape doesn't discredit my argument. Just as an example, I could assume your a feminist, and lets say you are (I don't know, and it really doesn't matter other than just for this example). The fact that you a…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:43 AM
5

I'm not trolling, I'm pointing out the obvious flaws with your definition. You said that if consent is not explicitly given then it is rape.However, everything isn't black and white like that, as illustrated by my example. Now tell me how you can justify using a definition that would categorize a situation like that as rape when it is not? EDIT: Here is the quote I was referencing to once again: "I'm sorry, but if there's no yes, there's no consent. And sex without consent is rape."
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:06 PM
4

This is incredibly cringe worthy, and just terrible advice.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:34 PM
5

"I'm sorry, but if there's no yes, there's no consent. And sex without consent is rape." Just to comment on your last point there, which in my opinion, is why your argument is flawed. If my girlfriend initiates sex without me verbally saying "yes", but I do want to have sex, then it is not rape. I repeat, I never told her yes, but I don't stop her because I want to have sex. The fact that I want to have sex means this is not rape. Now, your definition defines this as rape since I never explicitl…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:18 PM
46

What do you want to wear today? white button-up and khakis. Where do you want to go? To the office. At the office you receive a phone call from your wife, she is filing for divorce and taking the kids.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 09:03 PM
3

This is a very limited definition, because if it is strictly applied to every sexual encounter, then a fair bit of them would be considered rape. People have sex without both of them explicitly saying "yes" to having sex while still being consensual sex. I seriously doubt every consensual sexual encounter starts with "do you consent to having sex with me" or "do you want to have sex?" as people who have been dating for a while, or are married probably bypass this step. This is why the definition…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:47 PM
1

Reverse the Roles in this played by the two and I wonder how much time a man would have gotten for this, and what he would have been charged with.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 03:15 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter