TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

istira_balegina Archive

View 16 posts and 400 comments by istira_balegina on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
227

Discriminationistira_balegina/r/MensRights10/03/20 06:24 AM
107

Fathers/Custodyistira_balegina/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:59 PM
64

istira_balegina/r/MensRights03/02/20 06:20 AM
27

Generalistira_balegina/r/MensRights25/04/20 10:34 PM
22

Marriage/Childrenistira_balegina/r/MensRights15/03/22 11:33 AM
19

Discriminationistira_balegina/r/MensRights08/03/17 03:20 PM
13

Generalistira_balegina/r/MensRights02/10/19 01:58 PM
10

Social Issuesistira_balegina/r/MensRights27/06/19 03:54 PM
10

Healthistira_balegina/r/MensRights13/01/20 05:31 AM
9

Feminismistira_balegina/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:31 AM
7

Legal Rightsistira_balegina/r/MensRights03/12/17 05:29 PM
6

istira_balegina/r/MensRights13/07/19 10:04 PM
6

Legal Rightsistira_balegina/r/MensRights11/06/16 01:50 AM
3

Edu./Occu.istira_balegina/r/MensRights18/06/16 01:05 AM
2

Feminismistira_balegina/r/MensRights30/12/16 10:21 PM
0

False Accusationistira_balegina/r/MensRights27/09/19 11:54 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

She had the ultimate pussy pass. Not sure why this is on this sub.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/12/24 05:28 AM
2

Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights05/08/24 08:35 AM
1

Having lived abroad some years now, dating has the same logic everywhere: date someone who’d date you if money wasn’t factor. If you’re fat ugly and in your 60s, don’t date your hot poor 25 year old masseuse. Date someone in your own age group and economic class.
/r/MensRights01/04/24 10:01 AM
1

Oh ok, usually Yale x, would mean they’re at Yale currently.
/r/MensRights26/03/24 08:06 AM
1

I don’t see anything about Yale
/r/MensRights25/03/24 06:10 AM
9

Dude, first, change your location, get out of America if that’s where you’re at. Two, you’re stuck in a loop. You may be depressed because you think you can’t change and you think you can’t change because you’re depressed. Commit to the idea that you can, even if you don’t feel like it, and break the cycle. Sounds like some Jordan Peterson may help you.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 07:20 AM
2

This was what I was going to say, but there are many options, and first decide what culture/women speak to you: Asian, Latin, European etc. Date someone your age and economic strata and you should be fine.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 08:34 AM
11

Women weren’t oppressed, they were coddled. The lower class, men and women, were oppressed together, men probably more than women.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 05:07 AM
61

Yea, get out. Go somewhere with a more traditional culture or just more open minded.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 07:22 PM
126

Are you American (or Canadian or British)? I think culture has a lot to do with this. If I were you, I’d get out and go somewhere that doesn’t have the same gynocentric and sex-phobic culture that the US does.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 07:07 PM
6

You stole this from the Tate Tucker interview.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/23 10:22 AM
13

Latinas are probably less affected by US culture than Asians.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 07:05 AM
13

This is very true. Unfortunately many Asian women in the States have been ruined by the culture. Not that they don’t want money elsewhere, it just makes them worse.
/r/MensRights19/08/23 06:38 AM
-1

This is absolutely not true. The cause of this impression is older men who date young pretty girls who would never date them except for their money. Date within your age/class and the relationships are normal.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:09 AM
17

Read the Lisak review. He cites it there. (And that he doesn’t find it reliable for unknown reasons, but likely just because the numbers are too high for his tastes.) Edit: I link to the Lisak review in my follow up comment. Edit 2: This medium article seems to do a good review of the Lisak review and the actual data. https://medium.com/@derek7272/how-rare-are-false-allegations-of-rape-an-analysis-of-10-studies-bb011192504a
/r/MensRights31/05/23 04:14 PM
26

Again, false. Read the Lisak review. This was addressed on this sub ad nauseum. Lisak uses “false complaints” in lieu of proven false complaints. He’s not talking about how many are actually false, but rather how many are proven false, and even then, only of those cases reported to the police. He probably did this because he knew sycophants and the gullible like you would not actually read the paper and would parrot the false interpretation that he is referring to all false accusations. Read the…
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:36 PM
47

No, 2-11% are proven false after a police investigation. A much greater amount are false, data indicates more than half. Please take your trash elsewhere.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 03:13 PM
24

This is incredibly unfair and should not be legal to arrest for being drunk in a car without actually driving. I see no pussy pass here, she should never have been arrested, let alone interfered with by cops. F America’s “freedom”.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/05/23 05:29 AM
15

Defamation is abuse.
/r/MensRights26/04/23 05:38 PM
1

Read the review by Lisak. He quotes some of those studies then explains why he doesn’t include them. Ultimately it comes down to he doesn’t approve them because they’re not feminist enough.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 03:43 PM
4

OP your numbers are blatantly false taken from feminist propaganda. Do better. There are studies saying as much as 40-60% of accusations are false. Of course feminists (including Lisak) ignore those studies. And Lisak’s 2-10% refers to proven false accusations. Not false accusations. Get rid of this propaganda from here.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 01:42 PM
15

This is what I have done.
/r/MensRights10/12/22 09:52 PM
18

The red pill film had some pretty serious resistance.
/r/MensRights06/12/22 10:07 PM
1

You’re wrong. https://www.schlissellawfirm.com/prostitution-charges-against-sixteen-year-old-dismissed-2/amp/
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 06:54 AM
12

This is patently untrue. If you live in a household and act as the child’s parent, in many locations you take on liability as the child’s father.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/22 06:23 AM
19

Bro, you need a course on life.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 10:16 PM
1

I don’t see how that’s different than sending her an email saying the same thing. The email now sits in her inbox which is a violation of her property? This doesn’t make sense. If this is the US and a public institution you may even have grounds for a first amendment claim.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 10:07 PM
40

Every organization and individual who signed this can justifiably be called “pro-abuser”. Now think of how many male oriented organizations exist and ask why women need all these orgs.
/r/MensRights17/11/22 01:22 AM
5

It hasn’t. It changes by about a quarter percent in each direction every year.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 06:52 AM
1

Literally not. Only in Title IX for admissions was a limited exception given for substantial government interest. No such exception was given in Title VII.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 05:35 AM
-2

I think people who attack others not on their ideas but on insinuations based on their post history should get automatic bans.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:09 AM
4

OP, keep a record of this, this is blatantly illegal under Title 7. If you ever need leverage, this is it.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:04 AM
83

It is all fun and games until it actually matters. Then we see they’re full of shit.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 04:09 PM
2

You’re doubling down on the non distinction between the literal meaning of “involuntarily celibate” and the ideological and cultural movement that identified with the term incel.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:52 PM
2

Saying incel means involuntary celibate therefore that’s what it means is like saying feminism is about equal rights because that’s what feminists say it means. Yes, literally, incel means involuntary celibate. And yes, it was started by a woman who was involuntarily celibate. But it also sounds like you weren’t around when r/incel was around. It was a black pill subreddit that blamed society for their situation and had very low opinions of women. They may be partly or even mostly correct. But y…
/r/MensRights30/09/22 05:18 PM
2

See my comment above. The purpose of it is to intimidate her into a negotiated abortion.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 04:49 PM
26

Hopefully he can scare her into getting an abortion.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 07:46 AM
427

Have you checked whether this counts as rape by deception? Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights28/09/22 10:49 PM
2

You clearly have no idea how child support or custody works. See the link I posted below for child support calculations. In most cases, women get full custody by default, even when against the fathers wishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:52 AM
0

In California, someone making 55k a year will have to pay 200k over 18 years, while a surrogacy will typically cost less than 70k. https://www.westcoastsurrogacy.com/surrogate-program-for-intended-parents/surrogate-mother-cost https://childsupport.ca.gov/guideline-calculator/
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:38 AM
1

Maybe you just don’t understand because you don’t want to so let me rephrase it. We know that value of the hardship carrying a pregnancy because there is a price to surrogacy. We also know what a birth costs men. And the cost of carrying a child (valued at the cost of surrogacy but actually way less because it’s your own child) is way way way less than the cost of child support. So yes, the market has determined that the hardship of pregnancy is a fraction the hardship of child support. I’m sorr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 03:04 AM
-6

This is actually blatantly false. The cost of surrogacy is a fraction of child support. Meaning it affects men more.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 02:40 AM
26

The State as bully by proxy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/22 07:49 PM
5

In Thailand lady boys are considered men.
/r/AntiFeminists11/07/22 12:56 AM
1

Scott Adams bringing back the biblical wayward son.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:14 AM
2

What did Depp's lawyer say that was considered defamation?
/r/MensRights02/06/22 12:14 AM
13

Women judge women more harshly than men. They know a lying bitch when they see one and arent afraid to call her out. Men on the other hand will white night that shit if she's pretty.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 04:14 AM
12

r/supportfortheaccused
/r/MensRights16/05/22 11:45 AM
0

r/jordanpeterson
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 03:18 PM
2

Among wealthy white people, the numbers are similar. The deviation increases the more you diverge from that. So poorer white men are going into the trades or the military, and young black men are mostly in prison, so you have the greatest gender disparity in that demographic. In the Latino community their version of masculinity is also less academic oriented, so more women attend. And the Universities dont help by creating somewhat hostile environments for men while giving women added incentives…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 03:35 AM
0

I cant find it either. But it was something about both sides need to forgive and let it go because this will only lead to increased negativity or something. Of course no criticism for Heard for starting it. Or acknowledgment of his role.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/22 11:35 AM
8

This is why Elon Musk asked them on twitter to let it go. This was the one time I lost respect for Elon. He knows if it goes on he will have to testify that he was banging Depps wife. So instead he framed it as Depp being petty.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/22 11:10 AM
15

I'd look in to see whether in your state this can be classified as sexual assault. If it is, check if in your state there are exceptions for minors being assaulted in the statute of limitations laws. It may enable you to sue her past the typical statute of limitations or to bring criminal charges. Also check what happens when you dont know about damages until a later period of time, some states have exceptions about that. Obviously, get a consultation with a local attorney. They are usually free…
/r/MensRights12/03/22 12:51 PM
6

Sounds like bpd taking advantage if Americas current obsession with victimhood narratives. Like many other Ivy league/privileged women.
/r/AntiFeminists17/01/22 04:30 PM
-3

I happen to agree with this even if it's not worded so delicately. Noone is responsible for murder because someone they fired, rightly or wrongly, offed themselves.
/r/MensRights08/01/22 07:17 PM
2

I'm surprised the sub hasn't been renamed yet to be trans inclusive. Sounds like a hate sub to me.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 10:33 PM
14

You are absolutely correct, and I wasnt trying to negate that history. You should read my comment as "Incel was coopted into the popular lexicon etc etc." Incel is to gender what alt-right is to race. It is the boogeyman used by the Institution to silence opposition. Which worked out well for MRA's as they used to be the gender evil catchall.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/21 05:10 PM
374

Incel was always intended as a term to shame men into doing women's bidding.
/r/PussyPassDenied30/12/21 02:20 PM
29

Apparently Beverly Hills. Heres the CA definition of extortion. The question becomes whether demanding a person remain on a show constitutes extortion. . Definition and Elements of the Crime Under California Penal Code Section 518 PC, extortion (commonly referred to as "blackmail") is a criminal offense that involves the use of force or threats to compel another person into providing money or property, or using force or threats to compel a public official to perform or neglect an official act or…
/r/MensRights28/12/21 05:45 PM
44

Anyone know what county he lives in? A police report should be made for his blatant extortion.
/r/MensRights28/12/21 04:32 PM
4

Yup, that was a felony.
/r/AntiFeminists28/12/21 09:33 AM
23

Read the article: The Alabama appeals court vacated the lower court’s decision and ruled that an engagement ring is a gift conditional on the marriage actually going through.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/12/21 03:32 PM
6

Now do one with the draft and dead shot up men.
/r/AntiFeminists07/12/21 03:27 PM
2

Just enact a law that one cannot be President if they are not subject to the draft. If you're not subject to orders you can't give the orders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/12/21 12:50 PM
-3

Yup.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 04:40 PM
-20

It looks like for most people my observation belongs in r/whoosh
/r/MensRights05/12/21 01:50 PM
-28

Look at all the systemic reasons women have not earned as much as men! Look at all the individual reasons men are failures! This article is a trove of mensrights talking points.
/r/MensRights05/12/21 11:42 AM
5

Why do we have to be victims to celebrate who we are? Be male be proud! That's all.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 11:37 AM
23

I would go to your uni's Title IX office and ask about resources. Most importantly, name names. You don't have to file an official accusation, although that would be even more helpful, but you should inquire about what resources they may have to help you as a victim. DO NOT say you're worried about an accusation. Leave that part out. Just talk about the part where you heard they tried to rape you. But verify the rumor first. Make sure it has basis. Otherwise you're the aggressor by ruining their…
/r/MensRights16/11/21 08:48 AM
16

Why are you on that sexist app in the first place?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/09/21 06:24 AM
1

Before you run, take care to protect yourself from false accusations. She may use the threat of one to keep you. If possible, put her in a situation where she will be liable for one. Document everything that could turn into one.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 01:54 AM
216

Emma Watson once said she had no dating life at Brown because everyone was too shy to ask her out.
/r/seduction17/09/21 09:31 PM
2

Good job Michael Scott!
/r/seduction13/09/21 10:07 PM
2

The statistics in the USA have backed this up too. This has been a steady trend since the last year there were more men than women in college--in 1979. See Dept of ED for statistics. It's just kept as an open and ignored secret because nobody cares.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 08:48 AM
6

What do women think of male abortion rights?
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:23 AM
18

This article in a nutshell: "If you care about our society, one, and, two, if you care about women, you have to care about the boys, too. If you have equally educated numbers of men and women that just makes a better society, and it makes it better for women" Care for men because it's better for women.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 03:19 AM
-2

OP you're spot on. And a lot of fragile minds will short circuit as they're confronted by complete cognitive dissonance. That hostility is not because you're wrong or evil, but because they can't confront truth that hurts their identitarian power and privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/21 07:58 PM
0

So I dont understand your point. What is that we're debating?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 08:58 PM
-1

This only provides evidence that he is for egalitarianism. This article notes he was against VAWA. VAWA is inherently sexist as denoted in its name. Can you point to what specific evidence you are reaching for?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 07:34 PM
1

Do you have evidence otherwise?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 07:10 PM
1

Please provide evidence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 07:09 PM
1

Please provide evidence of lack of sex based egalitarianism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 05:19 PM
1

Do they not believe in equality? Rand Paul, for example, argued against the draft for both sexes. That is egalitarian. I'm not sure what other evidence you require. Do you have any evidence he is not egalitarian?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 04:51 PM
1

Ignorance is not the same as knowledge. When looking for principled Republicans, I would generally start with the libertarian wing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 11:31 AM
1

When every commenter on a post says the same myopic factually wrong thing about the outgroup it means the group suffers a lack of viewpoint diversity. Also, lexically, it seems you misinterpreted the meaning of "members". You interpreted it to mean all members, but it can also mean individual members. Semantically, it should mean the latter, as if it meant the former, I could have just omitted that word and gone with "this sub".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 11:18 AM
1

That is just blatantly false.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 04:36 AM
1

It's interesting how members of this sub lump all Republicans into a heap as if they're monolithic. There is a wing of Republicans that is chivalristic and want a traditional men protect women etc. But there are others (admittedly the minority) who believe in equality. The feminist movement was similarly split when it came to the civil rights ammendment in the 1960s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/21 02:31 AM
4

That's because the legal challenges are dumb af. Only a super entitled over funded narcissistic movement would ever think to make the arguments they've made to challenge it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/21 09:42 PM
1

Nope, a matriarchy implies women control things. That binary misrepresentation is deliberately crafted in the feminist narrative. The real fact is that patriarchy is primarily a class issue with elite men protecting women above the status of the common man. Biden is a great example of this.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 07:12 PM
1

Nope, patriarchy elevates and protects women above men. In a patriarchy it goes elite men > women > the rest of men. The elite men protect women and use lower class men to accomplish that. And so the conservative elites want to send working class men to die to protect their daughters and women as a class, and ultimately elevate themselves as womens' saviors.
/r/MensRights26/07/21 04:02 PM
-9

r/whoosh
/r/MensRights25/07/21 07:02 PM
-14

That's patriarchy for you.
/r/MensRights25/07/21 06:54 PM
2

I think in general you're correct, but dont underestimate how influenced even a right wing woman is by contextual cultural influences when narrative matters to her self interest.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 12:07 PM
9

It's interesting he doesnt put this in the context of male vs female issues but rather as vets vs civilians.
/r/MensRights03/07/21 03:22 PM
2

Have you seen any states ban feminism from schools yet?
/r/MensRights27/06/21 12:08 PM
14

It's really just feminism applied to race. It's a testament to female power that conservatives arent going after feminism. Or maybe conservative selectionism is a testament to conservatives actually being racists.
/r/MensRights27/06/21 09:11 AM
1

Public schools.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 11:09 AM
29

I'm not interested in debating = female privilege.
/r/AntiFeminists18/05/21 08:23 AM
1

Yes, and he and the school got none of it. Because she had already spent it all.
/r/MensRights08/04/21 08:00 AM
3

Dont do it and sue the govt. Theres no question you will win. Just someone has to have the balls to do it.
/r/MensRights14/02/21 07:40 PM
5

Your first mistake is going on Bumble.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/02/21 02:03 AM
2

Unreal. Still up in Thailand. But not US.
/r/MensRights22/12/20 03:52 PM
2

Blocked by Google
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/12/20 05:41 AM
4

You cant cancel Jonny Depp. Maybe he'll make less money, but he sells himself, he creates his own audience. If he goes indy, the major studios will suffer and he'll make tons of cash. Sucks for them.
/r/PussyPass14/11/20 11:29 AM
-1

Neither did you. And you resort to fabricated negative assumptions about my reasoning. If you dont see you are projecting and are what you hate, I cannot help you.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen01/11/20 02:59 AM
-1

There's no point as there's no cure for TDS. Good luck.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen01/11/20 02:29 AM
-9

You are terribly misinformed.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen31/10/20 09:21 PM
10

r/stupidpol
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/20 06:59 AM
4

Lisak did not do a study. He simply did a review of previous studies. So his is also before 2011. Moreover, he doesnt make a claim about the rate of false accusations, but about how many the police determined to be false. The actual rate of false accusations is unknown. Dont do feminists jobs for them.
/r/AntiFeminists01/10/20 10:18 AM
3

Now you're deliberately twisting what I was saying by leaving out half the quote. You're not here to have a conversation in good faith, so I'm done talking to you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 05:58 AM
5

You're doing a strawman. I'm not anti abortion (at least early term.) I'm making an argument about equality, not abortion. I'm not sure how many times I have to restate this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 05:50 AM
5

That may be the subs position --even though I don't think it is, the mission statement supports egalitarianism, not one sided reproductive rights, point me exactly to where it states otherwise-- but that is also irrelevant. OP was making a statement about equal rights, when his position is not equal and Barret's is. Whether you're pro choice or not is irrelevant to egalitarianism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 04:48 AM
5

That's a red herring and has nothing to do with egalitarianism. Either you are pro both sexes having reproductive rights, or neither. Nothing else is egalitarian.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 04:12 AM
2

I did, haha, thanks. Please consider my points seriously.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 01:33 AM
5

Both of your points undermine your arguments. For one, the federalist society is not "very right wing." They're originalists, which is a conservative way of legal interpretation, "the Scalia method". This does not show anti egalitarianism nor does it show she's a bad person. Second, being anti-choice is actually the egalitarian position at the moment. Men do not have reproductive rights in this country. So if she is against women's reproductive rights, then she is actually for the equal rights p…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 01:26 AM
3

Source?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/09/20 01:18 AM
8

What makes you say she's not a good person or that she doesnt support equal rights?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/09/20 08:08 PM
3

I dont know. Personally I'm pro abortion first trimesterish. But theres little nuance in the conversation anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/20 05:33 PM
4

If there were procedural irregularities, he can file a complaint with ED for free, but good luck hoping anything will come of it.
/r/MensRights21/09/20 07:02 PM
78

Lucky for him, if the title is true, its a hole in one title ix lawsuit.
/r/PussyPass17/09/20 05:20 PM
8

In the US, it's about "gender stereotyping". One cannot gender stereotype to determine a dress code based on gender. Hence why men can sue if not allowed to come to work in sleeveless low cut blouses.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/09/20 10:54 PM
22

One element of Title vii, workplace discrimination, is that a company cannot dictate what is appropriate female dress code. Ginsburg invented this interpretation to allow women to wear pants to work. I always wondered what would happen if men started showing up in blouses and skirts. You can bet the law would be reinterpreted before you can say "feminism is about equality".
/r/FeminismStopsWhen14/09/20 10:46 PM
6

1978 = last year of parity. It's now at 58-42% women to men. It has increased steadily every year. It is a 40 year old problem and no one has said boo about it. Really opens your eyes to the Orwellianess of this shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/08/20 04:26 AM
9

As a man, try walking into your job with a sleeveless shirt or a kilt. See how quickly gender equality goes out the window. I dont know why more men dont try this.
/r/MensRights21/08/20 09:24 AM
10

There's noone gatekeeping men's rights. It simply has been banished from the left. Even the right is somewhat uncomfortable with it given that many there see their role as the chivalrous protectors of women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/20 06:43 PM
2

Yall are right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/20 03:46 PM
3

You messed up by creating multiple variables. Its entirely possible they think your resume application makes you overqualified.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/20 02:12 AM
2

The Daily News does not contain the original tweet, just their version of selected translated quotes. I dont trust them, I want to see the original for myself.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/20 04:18 AM
1

Can you link?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/20 04:01 AM
6

The truth is black lives matter should be men's lives matter, if we follow the statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/06/20 07:18 PM
2

Ate you conflating the end of a "white American culture" with "white genocide"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/20 02:10 AM
1

Do you live in the 1950s?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/20 02:06 AM
16

Or when Trump insulted a woman, it was misogyny, but when he insulted a man, it was just an insult.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/20 02:05 AM
3

I'm pretty sure its men score higher in math and women score higher in language.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/05/20 04:03 PM
14

This is a great example of how patriarchy really works. It exists to be wielded by privileged women against less privileged/lower class men.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 05:21 AM
2

Thank god we changed it last week to believe women.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/05/20 05:17 AM
7

Yes. Which points? The Turner case? I have read through all the publically available court documents. You can start here. See last 20 pages of trial documents. http://paloaltoonline.com/media/reports/1465602933.pdf See Turner's appeal, Argument II http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4320973-Brock-Turner-Appeal.html Save our Sons did a great write up over the years, there are several articles. I suggest you read them all. https://helpsaveoursons.com/court-documents-trial-testimony/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/20 02:37 PM
6

I am not incorrect. You, like almost all other Americans have been misled by the media. The two students did not see the actual alleged sexual assault, they saw a guy on top of a girl who appeared incapacitated. That much was never in dispute. It is also undisputed that he ran away. What was withheld from the public was that there was no evidence of mens rea. There was no evidence that Turner was aware that she was incapacitated. He was very drunk. He was focused on her nethers with his hands. H…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/20 01:57 PM
1

Sorry but your comment seems pretty ignorant. While in theory there is a presumption of innocence in the court system, in practice it is not always so straightforward. Let's take a traffic ticket. You are innocent until proven guilty. But are you? The state treats the officer's word as the word of god. Unless you can prove the officer wrong, you are going to pay for that ticket. There is a similar practice in rape trials. He said she said. Are you innocent until proven guilty? Yes. Is a crying w…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/20 01:26 PM
2

Agreed.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 09:36 AM
7

For an 18 year old with a 15 year old. The state is criminal. Heck it should then be illegal then for 18 year olds to go to school with 15 year olds. What kind of criminal temptation is that? Unfucking believable but not surprising in our legacy puritan and gynocentric culture. I'm so sorry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 09:24 AM
5

Can you leave the states?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/05/20 09:17 AM
10

Do I hear #noperfectvictim for Tara? No? Right, she's not accusing Kavanaugh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/05/20 11:32 PM
1

File a complaint with ED.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/20 11:19 PM
3

If I had to draw broad strokes, I'd say being a liberal in the 90s was about sexcapades and moral relativity, in the 00s it was about anti christianity/atheism and civil liberties, and in the 10s the whole game board got flipped and the liberals went over to the dark side of neomarxist authoritarian postmodernism. Being an actual liberal now means being egalitarian anti feminist and probably Republican tbh. The Christians are now the relatively open minded and persecuted ones. Go figure.
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/20 06:33 PM
6

I would say anyone who participates in the culture wars or calls themselves a feminist definitely knows what a men's rights activist is. They were the boogeymen of the feminists for years until they got replaced by incels about two or three years ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/20 06:09 AM
12

Wow, the propragndiest propaganda I have ever seen. Susan Faludi, you would make Goebbels and Stalin proud.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/20 11:54 PM
9

I am convinced most of this sub joined this distinct subreddit because of their internalized left-ish hatred to MRAs that they havent yet shed, and not because the mensright sub is actually toxic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/20 11:42 PM
9

This guy. https://www.thecollegefix.com/columbia-professor-who-fled-communism-resigns-says-university-is-becoming-communist/
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/05/20 11:38 PM
1

Very interesting. I always thought the sub was representative of the real world. Can you give specific examples of communities you're referring to? And don't mean manosphere related things.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 08:08 AM
3

You seem to have internalized a feminist lensed view of men's rights. The men's rights sub is not nearly as toxic as you make it sound, they're one of the most egalitarian minded subs I know. I suggest as a first step you shed your mens rights stereotypes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/05/20 04:24 AM
10

I dont see you mentioning the Google review of it's own practices after their female employees complained about a supposed wage gap and then they found the men actually got paid less.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/20 04:17 PM
15

This is a great point about define "left" in left wing. No due process is very much a current left wing position while due process is a right wing position for most issues. So if you're pro due process what does it make you? The whole political alignment is fucked.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/20 10:53 AM
2

Donors to ACLU should sue for a refund.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 10:47 AM
6

Institute for Research on Male Supremacism Lol
/r/MensRights14/05/20 07:01 PM
1

TIL Asia Lee-Fatt is a cunt.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/20 10:04 AM
1

Remember the 60s when men didnt want to let women into their universities because they wouldnt be able to handle the pressure of free discourse, and the women were like yes we can yes we can we're just as capable as the men? Now we're seeing who won that argument. Too late though to revert.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/20 12:48 PM
1

r/jamesdamore
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/20 03:42 AM
1

Nah, they'll probably always go Motte and Bailey.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 03:33 AM
7

Really? She tweeted herself crying saying the Democrats are a cult and called Milano a hypocrite sellout. She's been about as vocal and consistent as one can be.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 03:32 AM
10

Because admitting men deserve sympathy would disempower feminists whose power rests on deploying the sympathy card. So men must be demonized at all costs. Especially low status men who are anyways hated by women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/20 01:59 PM
3

Very well said.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/20 12:21 PM
8

No true scotsman.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/05/20 05:39 AM
2

Right, which means this is not statutory rape but abusing authority which is a much more negligible crime.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 04:48 PM
4

Is 17 age of consent in Texas?
/r/MensRights09/05/20 10:23 AM
9

Let's not forget Google; where the women complained, a review was done, and voila, it was men who were underpaid the whole time.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/20 10:06 AM
25

Let's not forget, at least in the US, women spend 80% of household income. How exactly that breaks down I'm not sure, but their labor is not unpaid. You could even say the opposite.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/20 06:37 AM
6

Depends on the local culture. I once had a stripper in Vegas try to extort me.
/r/MGTOW08/05/20 12:12 PM
9

Actually you're wrong, its black men who are the most dangerous demographic, not "men". But even so, it doesnt make you any less racist or sexist. Principles of racism and sexism exist entirely independent of statistics. It's not like if black people committed more murders then black people would be rightfully banned from NYC trains. But that's what you're implying.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 03:24 PM
25

Naah, but I do feel that white people should have whites only trains in NYC because you know, black people made them unsafe. Gotta do something about those black people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:08 PM
6

Sounds like someone missed analogy day at school.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 12:54 PM
64

Reminds me of the Harvard coed orgs protest where single sex orgs were banned and the women stormed the quad demanding single sex spaces for women but not for men because girl power.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 12:34 PM
6

Theres a huge fallacy here that this is somehow gonna help. Like, no. As long as these institutions are run by the femnazis, whatever due process you put in their way is merely an inconvenience to overcome. As if if the Dems were in charge of the Kavanaugh hearing we would have seen a different outcome if the standard of proof was raised by 20%.
/r/MensRights07/05/20 09:12 AM
2

Theres a graph I saw somewhere with a curve that shows how like 90% of university level social justice activism happens in the top 10-20 percent ranked schools. Cant find it right now. Poor people have real problems. Social justice is like political instagram for privileged people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:56 PM
6

Could not agree with this more with the addition that like the four year old stomping their feet and saying to their parents its NOT FAIR, you're SO MEAN, you're the WORST PARENTS IN THE WORLD, while being a pampered daddy's girl, American women have collectively learned they can shout how oppressed they are and have daddy come to the rescue because he doesnt want precious to CRY when in fact she is the most spoiled girl in the neighborhood. And so American men perpetuate female class privilege.…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/20 02:03 PM
-4

Ask Sweden too. But my point still stands. Drastically intervening in the lives of young people and their futures to save mostly old and unhealthy people is actually anti life, not pro. There is a life utils algorithm, and if the total got decreased by the shutdown, then it was definitely not worth it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 01:18 PM
-1

I take a utilitarian point of view. More utils of quality life were lost by shutting down than gained. This is a classic trolley problem and we decided to hurt/kill and/or significantly damage many people's life to help what are mostly old and morbidly unhealthy people live a few more mostly miserable years. So no, this doesn't seem to be about profits but life utils, and we should not have intervened to the level we did.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 01:13 PM
7

Nah because jews destroy the oppressor/victim narrative. They show that oppression is not the sole reason for group failure. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ashkenazi_Jewish_intelligence https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_Nobel_laureates
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/05/20 04:26 PM
6

Perfectly stated.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 03:31 AM
3

Weinstein was convicted on less evidence.
/r/MGTOW01/05/20 01:30 AM
19

Yea this seems to be a real politically unmentionable issue. Everyone will probably agree admission to medical school should not discriminate based on gender etc. But then you have a limited number of slots, thereby excluding eligible potential male doctors, and spend ~$2 million on their education, and then a significant percentage of women decide in their mid to late 30s that they want to retire or practice part time family medicine so they can have a family life. That just seems to be a hugel…
/r/MGTOW24/04/20 08:15 AM
14

The Aquaman movie twitter account wished her happy birthday today.
/r/MensRights23/04/20 12:58 AM
17

On the contrary, there are strict federal rules prohibiting retaliation for filing complaints. He is more likely to get better grades afterwards. And as for playing their game, this is exactly how to win the war. If 10,000 men filed Title IX complaints against women in the next month, I guarantee you the system will shut down immediately. Like what sort of happened at NYU with Judith Butler.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 07:09 PM
50

This itself isnt, because you cant prove that the teacher's animus against the student's writing, or her animus against men's rights, is discrimination against the student for being a man. However, it does have the color of discrimination, which is that she deducted points against a man because of her poorly reasoned arguments as to how only women are discriminated against. While this itself is not actionable, it should be sufficient to question whether this teacher is acting in good faith or is…
/r/MensRights20/04/20 05:57 PM
618

Wow, your teacher is a moron. I would report her to the Title IX office and ask for a review of her grading for men v women. If the University says no, file a federal Title IX complaint.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 02:36 PM
26

I moved. Best decision ever.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/20 04:15 PM
3

Whether or not I'm left wing is dependent on exactly the point that OP is making. If leftism means neomarxist ideologies, than you're correct I'm not left wing, and neither is OP. If Left wing means liberalism and believing in equal rights and civil liberties for all people, than yes, I'm left wing. ​ This sub should probably clarify what they mean by "left wing" in their About page.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 12:39 PM
-4

Are you familiar with horseshoe theory? Third wave feminism is indeed leftism; it is a product of cultural marxism/the Frankfurt School and not liberal theory. We really have to bring back the distinction between "the left" and liberalism. As a marxist ideology, it has more in common with fascism than liberalism, as per horseshoe theory. I do, however, believe in the deep state and the liberal media. Those arent even theories anymore but plain facts supported by mountains of evidence. Not intere…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 07:26 AM
11

Yes, but then they'll target the man for making a nonconsensual lewd recording. It's a catch 22 gotcha situation, and it's already been happening for a while at US universities.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 07:35 AM
17

OP is missing the point. Even if she DOES say yes it's rape. Because now the man has to prove she said yes. Good luck with that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/20 06:07 AM
44

This woman deserves worst mother of the year award.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 09:08 PM
2

Clearly fund womenxs health because healthy women mean healthy men /s.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/20 01:40 PM
3

Yea, let me donate to the half of society that lives five years longer and outnumbers the other half 3:2 in higher education. That makes sense.
/r/MGTOW09/04/20 09:46 AM
7

Thanks for the information. And like you cited, a post here recently quoted a study if EU hiring rates by gender, and Austria was way to the end of the curve, where women were something like 8 or 9 times more likely to get a callback than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 01:31 PM
7

Every campus still has a "women's center" even though they've been the majority since 1979. The mind control is absolute.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/20 05:39 AM
10

That's because feminists arent interested in debate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/20 04:18 PM
5

Was this the story from Albany like three years ago?
/r/MensRights04/04/20 10:01 AM
16

Yes. For example, FACE the campus due process organization, is run by women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/03/20 08:49 PM
6

Follow the money.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 09:02 PM
2

Act now to help white people during the coronavirus pandemic.
/r/MensRights29/03/20 06:20 PM
15

It's not a dog whistle. It's just female supremacist.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 06:16 AM
6

Does it go instead to the child at least? Or is this just punitive.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/20 05:31 AM
1

Nah, we should just quarantine any old people and people at high risk, institute safety protocol for everyone else, and get back to work. We need to think of this more like a war than a panic. Winning the war is to push on with normal life despite the risks. Like Israel does in the face of terrorism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/20 01:15 PM
2

It's on top of regular unemployment.
/r/MGTOW26/03/20 03:40 PM
1

She will make 52k a year to sit on her ass. Or be with her children.
/r/MGTOW26/03/20 02:46 PM
1

When you get unemployment plus 600 a week.
/r/MGTOW26/03/20 02:29 PM
26

All of a sudden men are needed. But we've had an avalanche of "but women are the real victims" articles because babysitting you know, while its men who are a significant majority of the dead.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/03/20 06:59 AM
9

Very well stated.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 05:34 AM
8

I have a suspicion that may be already happening and why we're seeing higher death rates among men in Italy.
/r/MGTOW21/03/20 06:36 PM
1

Is it possible that when there are limited ventilators available, they're giving women preferential selection?
/r/MGTOW21/03/20 04:50 PM
7

According the in vogue definition in many circles on the left that sexism etc. is predicated on systemic power and not personal prejudice or power, women are much more systemically powerful than men. A man can beat a woman, sure, but if she beats him, he'll still be the one who goes to jail. The system favors women, full stop.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 08:28 AM
11

But women are expected to babysit! --The Atlantic But women who lose their husbands and sons are the real victims! --Hillary
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/20 04:19 AM
1

Link?
/r/MGTOW20/03/20 10:01 AM
4

No feminists in a foxhole.
/r/MensRights18/03/20 03:42 PM
8

"It is unfortunately common for men who have committed domestic abuse to present themselves as the ''victim'' when nothing could be further from the truth.' " Go fuck yourself Amber.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/20 06:17 AM
503

I wonder how common it is to eat during a deposition. From my experience, not common at all unless someone is a diabetic or similar. Her lawyer is a jackass. She is clearly looking for those pearly tears when discussing him hitting her.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 05:33 PM
9

The SPLC is a hate group.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/03/20 05:19 PM
4

It will just shift the heavy lifting to the men on the force while they handle the radio.
/r/MGTOW14/03/20 02:53 PM
6

I'd wager NM
/r/MGTOW13/03/20 07:04 AM
3

Omg I never got as a kid that its Bernstein with a pun on bear 🤦‍♂️
/r/MensRights11/03/20 06:12 PM
1

I have a bridge in Florida to sell you.
/r/MGTOW09/03/20 06:36 AM
1

By other women no less (Hillary). It's no secret that much of what women complain about as sexism (ie: slut shaming) is done by other women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/20 06:19 AM
9

It's in the guardian.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/03/20 05:07 PM
1

I'm Jewish. Grandparents were in Auschwitz. What were you saying?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 06:03 PM
1

The jews advocated the merit system when they were essentially banned from the ivys, white shoe law firms, medical schools and hospitals etc. This worked for the jews because they are smarter than everyone else. And this was one of the reasons Harvard and Yale had to put a quota on them. After Harvard etal started using the SAT, the Jews were edging out the white folk. Unfortunately, the merit system doesnt work well for black and latino folk. We could debate why that is but remember, if one eth…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/20 04:00 PM
7

On .win they announced they put the sub in restricted mode so only vetted members can post. It's intended to prevent brigading while the mod team is understaffed.
/r/MGTOW28/02/20 04:06 AM
1

If she were actually from NYC she would know manspreaders is code for young male African american.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 04:05 AM
6

Just say she asked you out multiple times. If they dont fire her your friend has a discrimination lawsuit on his hands.
/r/MGTOW28/02/20 03:59 AM
1

OP, you are 100% right. In all my university days I've heard hundreds of women ranting about feminism and about how feminism means equality, but never once heard of a push for women to pay on dates or even to ask men out. Neither did this ever happen. Additionally, I would say dating is the opposite of you get what you pay for. In my experience, again, the more a woman expects you to drop on a first date, the more she is using you for your money and will ghost you as soon as she got her fill. PS…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/20 03:21 AM
22

Those two entitled brats and their gayass friend explicitly demanding the pussypass and hiding behind "muh racism". Denied. Sweet justice.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen27/02/20 10:26 AM
27

Wow, wife cheated on him, had twins, and they divorced. Resume living together and he's kind enough to allow the children to live in his home. Court decides that means he has to pay for her extramarital children even after they separated. Fucking retarded.
/r/MGTOW25/02/20 01:30 PM
7

Haha thanks Vice for letting me know where all the good content is.
/r/MensRights24/02/20 09:00 PM
5

People here have to understand it's more of a culture thing. Nature v Nurture. Asian women in the west are more like white women than Asian women in Asia.
/r/MGTOW22/02/20 04:18 AM
119

WTF they wait a month then totally ignore the aquaman petition that has over 300,000 signatures?
/r/MensRights21/02/20 06:28 AM
9

I'm living in Asia now and can confirm: dating here is plentiful and wonderful compared to America. Yall should drop everything and move here.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 03:23 PM
7

The first half i dont see as a good experiment cause he took her down way more than she did. But the second one, damn, that black dude is a sexist. There was another video like this on YouTube a few years back. I forget by who.
/r/MensRights16/02/20 05:36 PM
11

Feminists: Rapists dont rape for sexual gratification, it is purely done as an an act of power and dominance over their victim. Also feminists: Accusers have nothing to gain by accusing. Feminists: Why would an accuser subject her life to scrutiny and shame by accusing someone? (Nevermind she is almost always a Jane Doe.) Also Feminists: Men who rape have total disregard for potential future ramifications like being arrested, put on the sex offender registry, media shamed even if found not guilt…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/20 09:58 AM
5

Despite being sympathetic to the falsely accused, she still cites the false "only 2% of allegations are false" statistic. That hoax is a cancer.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:28 PM
17

If I recall, many feminist groups rejected the ERA because it would mean equal responsibilities.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 06:17 PM
3

In many states that's illegal. They do it anyway because nobody sues.
/r/MGTOW13/02/20 05:09 AM
1

I noticed this a while ago. My theory: Radical feminists are compensating for extreme self loathing of their natural desire to be submissive to men. This denial of self leads to a Jeckyl and Hyde kind of bifurcation where to the extreme they dissociate from their natural desire in public life, they need to succumb to it all the more in the bedroom. Like you can be sure your facebook friend who posts constant motivational fluff is an unsuccessful depressive, you can also be sure women who post "b…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/20 09:56 PM
1

What does this sub think of intersectional leftism? I mean is being a non intersectional leftist these days an oxymoron?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/20 10:50 AM
5

Cathy Young tends to do that. She is a counter cultural centrist and misunderstood Trump and redpilling. She is more in line with Reason magazine types but often gives undeserved equivalencies or benefit of the doubts to mainstream left talking points. I have a sense that that is in part to appear centrist but also in part because she actually is somewhat centrist.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/02/20 08:20 AM
3

Cathy is good but she does have an unfortunate tendency to bend over backwards towards false equivalence or giving undeserved benefit of the doubt to appease or retain her bonafides to the left by appearing centrist. In this case she diminishes the clarity of the tapes' depiction of Heard as the sole aggressor and Depp as the sole victim.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 05:12 PM
46

Who runs this account? Feminists: rape is all about power and controlling the victim. Also Feminists: accusers have nothing to gain from making accusations.
/r/MensRights11/02/20 10:38 AM
2

The NFL, who is writing their checks, is literally the definition of patriarchy. I guess patriarchy doesn't matter when convenient.
/r/FeminismStopsWhen04/02/20 06:20 PM
7

Opened for a two minute listen ended up listening to the whole hour. TLDW: Heard admits to abusing Depp emotionally and physically, Blames Depp for escaping from her abuse instead of fighting back. Uses emotionally abusive language and gaslighting. This is Depp's smoking gun.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 03:05 PM
3

I wonder if his cuckoldry is why he got named in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/01/20 12:10 PM
1

The recent Boston trial, the first trial of a male suing their school that I'm aware of, resulted I believe in a 150,000 payout. That's pennies. Although I don't know about legal fees. Women typically settle for between 500k to one million. And that's a settlement.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 11:19 AM
2

I dont think you're correct. Yearly insurance premiums for Ivy level schools are about 25 million a year. If they pay out one million a year (and that's generous), that's not going to change their premium much. Women suing the school is a much bigger fear. They are more likely to win, get 10x the money, and their PR is effective at shaming the school. Getting sued by men is like a badge of honor for them. The more they pay out, the more their SJ bonafides.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 10:53 AM
4

Read and weep: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vox.com/platform/amp/2014/10/13/6966847/yes-means-yes-is-a-terrible-bill-and-i-completely-support-it
/r/MensRights29/01/20 04:43 AM
2

Future earnings for a college graduate are very ephemeral and practically null. If it's a law or medical graduate--yes, there is money there. But for a college graduate? The court will say prove that you would have gotten a job that pays more than a starbucks barista anyway. For example, in the Montague lawsuit, Yale argued their degrees are worthless because graduates make the same money whether they graduate or not. The only way to make any sort of bank is to have a high paying job already lin…
/r/MensRights29/01/20 04:36 AM
3

Not at all. First male lawsuits tend to settle for pennies on the dollar. Even those that are court ordered tend to be between 1-300k. Men get one tenth what women get. Second, their insurance pays for it anyways.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 04:29 AM
4

Disagree. Schools now have 100 million+ a year dedicated to "diversity initiatives". A million here or there for settlements is pocket change and only further shows their dedication to the cause. Social Justice is communism, not capitalism.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:52 AM
2

Orwell. Alinsky.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:50 AM
1

Not true in rape cases. He said she said, if the jury believes the accuser is "credible" whatever the fvck that means, they could send the accused away for life.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:46 AM
1

If a plaintiff does not fully pursue their defense with their employer or school, including all relevant appeals, the court will say that they forfeited their right to sue.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:44 AM
5

The courts are prejudiced against men too. There just isn't a legal history or sympathy to the perspective and plight of men like there is for women. Woman gets stared at wrong, tells court she was devastated: gets 1 million. Man gets his life and reputation destroyed / is assaulted by a lying violent cvnt, gets 35k if lucky.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:41 AM
2

I fully believe Biden is just a useful idiot. But Catherine Lhamon and the rest of her cadre of uber feminists? Evil.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:35 AM
7

This was stated explicitly by Ezra Klein of Vox in 2014.
/r/MensRights29/01/20 12:30 AM
-2

That's exactly my point. There is a way to rationalize blame for anything.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 11:52 PM
16

Sort of like Obama blaming the recession on Bush but taking credit for the Trump economy. There is always a way.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 04:48 PM
1

I dont see them sending their white male sponsored endowment to Africa. Funny how things work.
/r/MensRights26/01/20 07:25 AM
6

I'm convinced it's about repressed bias against "the other" and the ease to stigmatize them. This goes for all types of difference, who women could regret sleeping with them or easily see them as bad people. This goes for black people, immigrants, conservatives, asian asians, anyone who doesnt quite fit in as the cool stereotypical white male.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:28 PM
37

Every time he cuddled her while she was sleeping was non consensual sexual contact. Very straightforward.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:22 PM
1

I'm honestly surprised to see so much TDS from someone on this sub. As an equal rights movement that has been unfairly maligned, hated and lied about by the movement in power that is actually all the supremacist and hateful things they accuse us of, I'd think you'd use this perspective to see the same dynamics in their hatred of Trump. Trump so far, from my perspective is the first truly non prejudiced president, like the men's rights movement aims to be, which is why the left hates him so much;…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 08:35 AM
7

Any democrats on this sub? Who are you planning to vote for?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 02:38 PM
1

Source?
/r/PussyPass12/01/20 07:00 AM
1

Change My View: anyone who did not have to sign for selective service should be ineligible to be their commander in chief.
/r/AntiFeminists12/01/20 03:32 AM
2

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/us/13nevada.html There was a dude who went to a bunch of clubs, got told to pay a higher price. Then sued successfully.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:38 AM
1

https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/13/us/13nevada.html
/r/MensRights09/01/20 08:38 AM
3

The privilege of not being exposed to the issues men face.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 05:06 AM
3

Yea, google memory holed it. It's been shared in Israel over 500,000 times apparently. Now her attorneys are like: the real crime here is people watching her nonconsented to sex tape. And I'm like, girl, if you falsely accuse 12 men of rape, you lose your right to privacy of the evidence.
/r/PussyPass08/01/20 06:55 AM
11

That's because you're reading propaganda, not news. You were taken. They quote like half a dozen womens advocacy orgs and falsely imply the issue here is how she was questioned. You have a whole country mobilizing to support a false rape accuser, raising money for her, and portraying her as a victim, and we still dont know her name. Its disgusting really. "Police said she concocted the claim after learning video of her having consensual sex was posted online." www.thesun.co.uk/news/10649938/cypr…
/r/PussyPass08/01/20 05:43 AM
9

I dont understand. The woman claimed she was raped, theres video showing she wasnt. Why does it matter how she was questioned or whether she retracted?
/r/PussyPass08/01/20 05:02 AM
2

You do know theres video?
/r/PussyPass08/01/20 03:17 AM
1

No one is saying all a woman needs to do is make an allegation for a man to be convicted. The question is whether a substantial amount of convictions are false. Yes, obviously many allegations dont result in convictions. I already cited the RAINN statistic. You're arguing a strawman fallacy by using an irrelevant conclusion. You're also conflating sufficieny with possibility. Noone is saying an allegation alone is sufficient for conviction. The question is whether it can possibly lead to convict…
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/20 09:20 PM
1

So let me get this straight. You're saying that the same country in which "All current rape and serious sexual assault cases in England and Wales are to be reviewed "as a matter of urgency" to ensure evidence has been disclosed" (2017) because "the police were systematically withholding evidence from the defense" in multiple districts, doesnt have a false conviction problem? You sir/madam, have swallowed the feminist coolade hook line and sinker. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp…
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/20 05:01 PM
2

In the USA, RAINN claims less than three percent of rape allegations result in convictions with jail time. Yet there are tons of false rape convictions in the US because they convict on the word of the accuser alone. So unless your court system somehow uniquely exists in the perfected asshole of Jesus Christ I'm not sure how you're getting your numbers. Please cite what you learned in your criminology class.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/20 04:25 PM
3

And yet a substantial percentage of them still turn out to be fake.
/r/AntiFeminists05/01/20 10:42 AM
2

Haha
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:40 AM
9

I think this is not exactly true. There is nature and nurture a bit. Its natural to be more sympathetic to women. That is hardwired in men and exists across all communities and cultures. But whether one is sympathetic to black men more than white men depends if you were nurtured in a leftist environment or not.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 02:01 AM
0

Yes, if they're both narcissistic
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 09:22 AM
3

No. I've been contemplating whether its neuroticism: these are people who would otherwise be cat ladys or gamers and they are sharing their neuroticism as a group, like group therapy, or whether this is just a different version of being cucked, like, I accept being cucked, no body will ever love me, let's just call it a threesome and be done with it. The male gays are generally good looking. But they're a bunch of dudes. Gay sex is as easy as filling up the bathwater.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/19 01:46 PM
27

I've noticed this too. Follow r/polyamory and it's a steady stream of unattractive people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/19 01:37 PM
6

The cattiness and abuse of power would be out of this world.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 08:51 AM
19

Because it's abortion. Not murder. Either the fetus is human or it is not human. If it's human a mother should not be allowed to abort unless her life is in danger. That's why feminists insist on calling it a fetus and not a baby. If it's not human, then it's merely abortion. At most then, she should be able to sue him for theft. But he can't sue her when she aborts without his consent, so she shouldn't be able to sue him when he aborts without her consent. I would say equality's a bitch, but fe…
/r/FeminismStopsWhen13/12/19 03:13 PM
4

r/menkampf
/r/AntiFeminists30/11/19 01:52 PM
1

OJ won in criminal court but later lost in Civil Court. How does one differentiate when a crime can be adjudicated in civil court?
/r/MensRights29/11/19 07:06 PM
1

Again false. Please read the study before you armchair comment on it. The literature review comes from studies of local police departments. Moreover, you again misreported what the study says. The study doesn't discuss the prevalence of false reporting, but proven false reporting. Two different things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/19 05:21 PM
2

Those are all euphemisms. Insufficient evidence is a euphemism for she is a lying hack. Unfounded is a euphemism for a lie. And an open case only requires probable cause. Probable cause is obtained by a woman who points her finger at a man and police have no immediate evidence to prove she is lying. It does NOT mean there is evidence beyond her word that it is true. Edit: I made a mistake. An arrest requires probable cause. An open case doesnt even require that. It just means police are looking …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 10:07 PM
1

To claim that that women who accuse face negative repercussions that are even in the same ballpark as men who are accused of rape is to create such a fantasy world that I can only assume you've gone through the wormhole and live in a parallel universe. But hey, I'm not going to meddle in your fantasies. Just make sure to have tissues ready.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 10:02 PM
1

LOL. No it does not. You pulled that out of your ass. The 2-10 (actually 2.4 to 10.9) comes from a literature review by David Lisak, a venerated advocate researcher for feminist propaganda, and his "research" is therefore highly suspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 09:42 PM
0

The 2-10% comes from a literature review by David Lisak. It's actually 2.4 to 10.9%. Not sure (I actually am quite sure) how 10.9 became 10. Lisak himself is an advocate researcher. He is the also the one that came up with the bogus 25% of women in college will be sexually assaulted. There were several other studies that showed false rape accusations as in the 40-60% range, but Lisak magically found ways each of these studies were flawed. Apparently only the studies with prevalence rates under 1…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 09:36 PM
2

Fake news again. The other 60% are all over the place, without enough evidence to go either way. There, corrected it for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 09:29 PM
1

I agree, men would never rape given the incredibly negative repercussions it may have. But hey, some people just wanna believe men are so malicious that they go around just raping for the power trip.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 09:12 PM
0

I read the court documents. Here's what I got: They were in front of the dumpster, not behind it. The "behind the dumpster" propaganda was spread by Michelle Dauber, a wacko extremist feminist who hijacked the proceedings in the court of public opinion and later manipulated the public into getting the judge fired. There was no dna from Turner insider her vagina, only on the outside of her underwear. It was therefore conclusive that he did not penetrate her. Just moments before, her sister allowe…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 09:08 PM
1

Hail Mary. Hail Mary. Hail Mary.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 08:45 PM
2

Bye!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 12:23 PM
3

No, rape is a subset of sexual assault. In California, rape requires intercourse, of which there was none in the Turner case. He was not charged with rape because all parties agreed no sexual intercourse happened. Hence Turner is not a rapist. But keep it up, I'm enjoying your ignorance on full display.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 11:55 AM
4

No, unfounded is a separate category. This is stated explicitly by Lisak. Read the study before you spread your fake news.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 07:28 AM
5

Lol. About Turner: He was not convicted of rape but sexual assault. CNN, the vice president and literally every other media company was singing her praises. She outed HERSELF for the fame glory and riches of writing a book. What were you saying again?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 07:20 AM
4

🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 04:09 AM
9

No, I mirrored exactly what you did. Ironically, but entirely unsurprisingly, you employed whataboutism by making this about whataboutism. LOL.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:58 AM
4

You seriously have no self awareness, misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:27 AM
3

Finally someone said it. The ignorance on this sub is appalling. But even here it is lower than in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:23 AM
2

OP him/herself is peddling a false statistic. According to RAINN, its 2-3% proven true allegations. Now continue with your logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:20 AM
3

Where do you get your data that 20% are true? RAINN has been peddling the 2-3% of rape accusations result in convictions number for years, to show that out justice system does not support rape accusers. Do you have other numbers? Why not just use the feminists (RAINN) own numbers against them? Lisak's numbers btw, are 2.4-10.9%. How 10.9% gets rounded down to 10 is a mystery to me (it's not really). These numbers are substantial, because it shows accusations are proven false at a rate of up to f…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:16 AM
6

"Feminism is about equality." "But what about male victims?" "mysogynist!"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:09 AM
7

"Yea, but why would a woman fake a rape? Dont you know how much risk she takes to come forward?" Lady, why would a man rape, dont you know how much risk that puts him in? Oh, that's right you sexist piece of shit. You believe only women use logic. Or only women dont succumb to urges like power and narcissism. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:07 AM
5

"Sexual violence is one of the most...taboo subjects in every culture." Someone's drank the koolaid. Here we are in metoo, discussing this on an internet forum that had these discussion ALL the time, but apparently its taboo. 🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 03:03 AM
5

Brock Turner was not convicted for rape.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 02:59 AM
6

False. Haven Monahan didnt even exist, yet the cops refused to label it a false accusation. "Something terrible must have happened to her" said the police chief.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/19 02:56 AM
6

Its not. You can sue them.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 05:39 AM
1

It's actually 58% women. Fake news.
/r/MensRights29/10/19 03:42 PM
0

As a rule of thumb I dont check people's history. I respond to individual comments on their own merit. Every person's argument deserves to be taken seriously, even if other things they say we find odious.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 03:05 PM
10

It is actually you who is ignorant. According to US Justice Dept statistics for 2017, a black person was 59 times more likely to attack a white person than vice versa. Ignorance masquerading as patronising lecturing and hiding behind the threat of calling others racist only serves to obfuscate and therefore perpetuate the problem. Whether this problem derives from social conditioning or genetics is the discussion that everyone avoids because of how dangerous and taboo it is. So we just either ig…
/r/PussyPassDenied27/10/19 02:53 PM
1

" I just also think that some people don't "Black out" without having very obvious signs of their lack of awareness." I believe this is factually incorrect. But this is Googleable, so it's not something to get into a debate about.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 06:35 PM
1

I really don't get what you're saying. Do you deny the possibility that people can get drunk, enthusiastically consent, and then wonder the next morning wtf they were thinking? And in some cases, have so much internal conflict or guilt that the only way they can rid themselves of that dissonance is to convince themselves, entirely falsely, that they were taken advantage of?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 05:50 PM
1

Thank you for the extensive and well written reply. I agree with you this happens many times. You seem to agree sometimes accusations are simply false. So I'm confused. What are you saying that may not be intuitive or obvious? Are you saying anytime one party blacks out during sex that means they have a valid perspective of violation? This doesnt seem to be true, as one can blackout and still have near perfect control over their motor skills at the time but simply not remember it. This means the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 04:47 PM
2

No, there is simply no never. Almost all times someone says "always" or "never" about a social situation, they're wrong. In this case, sometimes the truth is somewhere between the two narratives. Sometimes it is entirely in one. To say it is always between the two narratives accomplishes nothing except a vain attempt to make the author of said statement look smart by appropriating a mechanism that smart people use which is to synthesize competing narratives. Except it doesnt make you look smart …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 10:38 AM
3

And you do it again. Here's your playbook: Step 1: follow the numbers! --Numbers don't play out how you want them to.-- Step 2: ignore the numbers and use whatever logic makes me feel good! Rinse and repeat.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 06:28 AM
4

I'm out too, because you're just repeating your false tropes and its tiresome and pointless to argue with an ideologue. But for those who are reading this thread, I want to make one more point. The research we currently have shows convictions at 2-3% of accusations made (Rainn). Proven false accusations are 2-10% (it's actually 11%, the 10 is another deceptive talking point )(Lisak). This means the data on the two ends of the spectrum, the areas we know about, indicate a false accusation rate of…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 06:15 AM
5

Incredible to read. I dont know at this point if you're just a troll because of how insane your response just was. Until now: you said the statistics showed women only made about 6% false rape claims. I showed that was false, and that only 2-10% are proven false by police, only 2-3% are proven true in a court of law, and the rest we dont know about. Now you seem to be agreeing with that premise without admitting you were spreading propaganda, but state that with the other 90%, which we dont know…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 05:36 AM
0

Replace incel with Muslim and Islamophobia and reread your sentence. Dont be that girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 05:13 AM
12

Ok, let me explain this to you, because you apparently think you know what you're talking about based on a magazine link and not even the original study. This magazine is propaganda. Fake news. Full stop. Here's what it says: What we do know is this: False reports are rare, ranging from 2 to 10 percent of all reported sexual assaults. This figure comes from a commonly cited 2010 study, published in the peer-reviewed international journal Violence Against Women. This meta-analysis evaluated more …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 05:04 AM
5

Hahahaha ignorance masquerading as fact. By your logic, only 2 percent are true, because that's how many result in convictions.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 04:49 AM
8

PSA for mysandrists: Dont assume a whole group of people are evil. That's called hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 04:42 AM
2

Stupidity masquerading as intellectualism.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 04:40 AM
8

False. 6 percent are proven false cases, not false accusations, which no one knows how prevalent they are. Please stop being a part of the problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 04:37 AM
1

Source? Fake news.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/19 04:35 AM
15

They're not your friends. Their GC probably told them to put it up so they can point to it when you sue them for wrongfully expelling you for sexual assault.
/r/MensRights15/10/19 10:47 AM
2

Or: You must've assaulted her.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 02:38 PM
16

Oh cry me a river. If this traumatized her she had no business even thinking she deserved a chance at Oxford in the first place. Probably failed her exam and needed an excuse. The uppity gyno victimhood privilege in this story is exhausting.
/r/MensRights10/10/19 10:19 PM
97

Woman who got her all her money from wealthy husband to spend money on women because they are disadvantaged. How about she spend that money on enabling men to marry wealthy like she did instead of having to work their asses? You know, for gender equality?
/r/PussyPass04/10/19 08:52 AM
1

Or because women are less hierarchical. They care less about being at the top and more about lifestyle and job satisfaction.
/r/MensRights03/10/19 05:29 PM
18

That's because of oppression in the engineering department obv. /s
/r/MensRights02/10/19 10:12 AM
3

Scratch that. If you sue the school, if will be a hole in one, and Title IX guarantees attorneys fees if you win, so speak to any civil rights attorney, they may take it on for the guaranteed attorneys fees down the line.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:24 PM
7

Yes. You can file a complaint with the OCR or sue the school, but you wont get much money, so the latter isnt practical.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:21 PM
7

What about the suspension? Was it vacated? The article does not mention it. It's sad too that he only got 100 k, which is all lost money and income. Essentially, he got no money for all the suffering he went through. He also only got one year delayed lost income for the suspension, but not for the money he lost fighting this thing, or avoiding a legal career until he cleared his name. It's a victory, but a phyrrian one.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 12:20 PM
1

This is so infuriating.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 11:13 AM
6

There is nothing you can do. Society will fuck you either way. Sucks to be a man.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 11:12 AM
4

"But neither companies HR is based here". Please explain.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:16 AM
4

That's incredible. Are you in a conservative area?
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:11 AM
2

It must be so difficult to be her. Stunning and courageous.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 04:37 PM
3

Why do you think I'm a troll?
/r/MensRights27/09/19 01:15 PM
4

First: they were in FRONT of the dumpster from the perspective of pedestrians. If they were behind the dumpster, the Swedes would never have been able to see what was going on from a distance. Dauber invented the "behind the dumpster" PR, and everyone bought it, even you, til this day. Second: how many people having consensual sex in public, (say on the beach) would run if busted. I guarantee you 99%+. So that's an irrelevant data point. Third: whiskey dick? Com'on. The jury decided based on a p…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 04:49 PM
6

No you're not stating the legal analysis. You're missing the most important and basic element, which is mens rea. And there was no conclusive evidence of that. You, like the rest of the hordes, are assuming he must have known she was passed out. Really? How do you know that? Short answer: You dont. You were just influenced like a sheep by the lying media and still dont even know it.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 04:20 PM
23

Everyone has to blame Turner on some level, otherwise they are clear rape apologists (/s). It's the sad state if affairs in the US.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 04:16 PM
18

Also "behind the dumpster". They were actually in FRONT of the dumpster, as the path the norwegians were on and which Turner was taking ran on the same side of the dumpster. It was only "behind" from the perspective of the street, but the street was not how pedestrians passed by the dumpster. It was Dauber who invented that term. Talk about straight white male privilege. Turner never had a chance and the public is not even aware of the facts or his perspective. They totally silenced and marauded…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 03:36 PM
54

Not only that, but the jury never proved Turner knew she had passed out. They assumed because he ran away he must be guilty. It really was a sham of justice. Dauber was a family friend, wrote her victim statement, and incited the masses which undoubtedly influenced the jury. The judge surely knew this which is why he mitigated the sentencing. The whole thing was an example of mob justice with the fake news leading the hordes. Turner may be guilty but the evidence just isnt there.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 02:48 PM
26

Actually, you're wrong. Her sister was there when they left, AND SHE WAS COOL WITH IT. So clearly, she didnt pass out standing at the dumpster, at that point she was still in control of herself, and she apparently passed out after they started making out in a semi secluded area. Your assumptions here are ignorant of the facts of the case and reflect only your own hubris.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 02:45 PM
5

"He knew he was doing something wrong". Yea, fingering a woman in public. Anyone would run away if approached by two hostile dudes yelling at you.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/19 02:40 PM
1

Hahahahahaha
/r/MensRights19/09/19 01:49 PM
4

Women surpassed men in college in 1979. And the gap has only widened ever since (ED). But the real invidiousness is that noone has said boo even though now it is almost 60-40 women:men. Feminism so controls the national conversation that most people still think it is women who are discriminated against in education. It is a clown world. I am convinced that the current Title IX issue was semi constructed because feminists know they can no longer keep the $ flowing in from a discriminated minority…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/19 05:27 AM
5

Forgot about custody.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 10:21 AM
2

Washington Post oped
/r/MensRights12/09/19 12:38 PM
27

This woman is a well known twitter troll and anti-SJW personality. This is why we need sources.
/r/AntiFeminists11/09/19 04:42 PM
1

Well, if men arent disgusted by periods... 🤣
/r/MensRights09/09/19 05:29 AM
4

Within your framework, that's fair.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:56 PM
2

Uhhhh first ammendment?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 11:57 AM
15

This writer is insufferable. I wonder how many friends he has.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 06:09 PM
3

Let's be more precise: black men. Ensue REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/19 03:41 PM
7

This is about as Orwellian as it gets. Reverse every word to describe feminism and it is true. I have always found that NOW and the NWLC are the most blatantly Orwellian of all the womens' groups. They won't blink an eye when they knowingly blatantly lie and reverse the truth on a global scale.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 04:37 AM
1

If she says shes feminist maybe just say, "oh, I'm not religious."
/r/TheRedPill12/08/19 05:28 PM
1

I'm aware. But those countries are actually androcenteic so nobody gives a damn. In the states itll create chaos.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 03:53 PM
2

This is great. Let's start a rumor that abortion disproportionately affects female fetuses. Then when they cry discrimination against females point out that a fetus is not a human and has no civil rights. See how quick abortion gets banned.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:59 AM
5

It's not going to get better until it gets as absolutely bad as it can get.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 01:32 PM
9

3 years is not enough. 2. She didn't just "pervert justice." She committed a crime--worse than rape--against a man. 3. Awww, I'm so sorry she was sad about losing her child friend. Must suck. Bitch.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/19 05:37 AM
12

I'd put down money it was the men.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/08/19 05:26 AM
11

You're a shill for the following reason: you are responding to an instance where there was video evidence that she lied with a comment "but muh what about where she admits she lied!?". And that of course us your answer. Penalties for self admission should be lower, but if the proof comes from elsewhere, the penalty should be astromically high.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 02:49 AM
6

Exactly. Because the men approaching you are from an older generation with different mores.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/19 04:59 AM
1

This post should not be pussypass denied. This girl did not deserve to get her head smashed. Entirely disproportionate.
/r/PussyPassDenied14/07/19 06:15 PM
2

Goat attacks woman: man steps in to help. Goat attacks man: nobody, including the many nearby women, step in to help.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 10:21 PM
1

You missed what I said. If it's legal to bare your breasts, then it's not sexual assault to grab said breasts. It is not sexual assault to grab a man's breasts.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/19 07:37 PM
0

This is a double sided coin. If it's legal to bare them, then its not sexual assault to grab them.
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/19 07:16 PM
-1

I was gonna help you, but given that you made sure to let us know you're better than us, I suggest instead you try the feminist subreddit. Since they care about equal rights there, I'm sure they'll be very supportive.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:11 PM
10

*the average man has 40% more upper body strength than the average woman.
/r/AntiFeminists07/07/19 04:55 AM
1

Very simple. It threatens their power.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/19 02:49 PM
6

So basically they needed an equivalent word for misogyny for what Nazism is to racism. If there isnt an enemy out there to smear, what are you fighting for? So now everyone who disagrees with a leftist is a Nazi or alt-right, and anyone who disagreed with a feminist is an incel? Kinda surprising they're not satisfied with calling them MRA's anymore.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 05:25 PM
7

Agreed
/r/MensRights21/06/19 01:36 PM
5

I saw that as a rhetorical device, I don't think she actually believes that. She was speaking to her audience, a radical feminist, who can only understand the world in terms of how women are disadvantaged.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 08:43 PM
3

According to the law, you, as a man, have a right to go to work in a dress. I've never seen this tried yet though. Anyone want to be the trailblazer?
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:18 AM
11

This sounds like Nietzsche's Geneaology of Morals. Be an ubermentch. Not a pharisee.
/r/TheRedPill28/05/19 11:00 AM
1

Smile
/r/seduction20/04/19 12:27 PM
0

And how do you know this that rape happens more? *false-statistic-peddling* ​
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 03:52 AM
3

I sure hope this is a troll post. ​ ​
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/19 03:44 AM
1

This is very interesting. Can you share more resources on this? I feel like your description of it was better and somewhat different than the link you shared, so Im assuming you have other sources.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 04:03 PM
2

Because title ix does not include "disparate impact".
/r/MensRights04/04/17 01:09 PM
1

Their reading of Title IX to force fraternities to accept women displays their total ignorance of how the law works.
/r/MensRights19/02/17 08:00 AM
3

To my mind, if 2% of rape accusations result in convictions, and 6% are proven to be false, than there is a 3:1 ratio of false to real claims of rape. This would say that of the 92% of unknown cases, 75% should statistically be assumed to be false.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 10:57 PM
3

I didn't mean to say trump is an MRA. I meant to reply to her writing: she says men vote trump because they haven't evolved. I say they vote trump because they read rantings like hers and vote trump just to piss her off.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 12:38 PM
1

Tried to archive but didn't work.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 04:40 AM
1

Thanks, but I'm pretty sure the site only lists lawsuits of accused students. This is a lawsuit by an accuser.
/r/MensRights18/06/16 03:40 AM
1

Basis of belief?
/r/MensRights12/06/16 06:44 AM
1

Why do you believe its not possible he simply failed to notice she slipped into unconsciousness as he was on top of her? Was he looking into her face at the time?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 11:35 PM
2

He does not need evidence to counter that he was on top of an unconscious woman, as being on top of an unconscious woman is not a crime unless he had no right to assume he had consent, or he noticed she passed out and therefore consent was withdrawn. She needs to prove that she did not offer consent before she passed out, which there were no witnesses to other than Brock, and he claimed he received that consent. And he may very well have not noticed that she passed out, which she would have to p…
/r/MensRights11/06/16 05:41 PM
0

And that proves it beyond a reasonable doubt? Have you ever been to a college campus?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 06:50 AM
2

The defense did bring it up. Noone else was there at the moment when the consent may have happened, including the woman as she does not remember; so it's not even a he said she said.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 06:45 AM
2

How does any of the above count as beyond a reasonable doubt, though?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:17 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter