TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

itsTacoOclocko Archive

View 0 posts and 23 comments by itsTacoOclocko on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

he asked the same question on txox, never gave links to what he was supposedly referencing. almost every response was 'we don't, we just like that women are no longer compelled into relationships for financial security or supposed existential completion'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 02:57 AM
19

yep. basically 'men take it for granted that women will be subservient and attend to the majority or all of the domestic duties'. because they don't realize they're expecting this, because they simply take that as a given within a partnership... they don't understand when women are incompatible in this area or rejecting them because of this disparity in expectation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/02/24 01:46 AM
7

i don't even know what to say to this, because the idea of lusting over a male stripper is so... foreign to me, as is the idea of overtly expressing any sort of sexual desire in public or towards a stranger. but i suppose that's sort of my point-- there are plenty of women to whom male strippers are undesirable, or considerably less desirable than other men? there's also the fact that stripping is a fantasy. like... a lot of men watch things in porn that they'll never do, don't want to do. they'…
/r/ExRedPill16/12/23 02:53 PM
2

so... when this does happen... what's usually happening is that people with unresolved trauma, self-esteem or self-efficacy deficits, a history of abuse will tend to seek out partners who feel familiar (i.e. are also abusive) or are what they believe they deserve (i.e. crap). a lot of people with a history of childhood trauma or abuse will also derive self-worth from the idea of self-sacrifice, of being able to 'save' someone. so... you do get women who go for not-great men. it's not for any of …
/r/ExRedPill16/12/23 02:43 PM
21

that phrase also assumes that all men are only really looking for sex (and women don't really want it) while all women are angling for commitment (which men are reluctant to give). in my experience neither of those are true. most humans want to have sex and want a committed partner with whom to have sex. it's not gendered. the type of men who're vulnerable to TRP are often wanting a committed relationship, too-- some of them have a weird reaction-formation response to it, though. they want a wom…
/r/ExRedPill13/12/23 01:51 PM
12

'women love being abused! you should abuse them! be an asshole and they'll love you.' and also 'women have no idea what they want! don't ask a fish, ask the fisherman!' 'women actually enjoy being raped!' (which that might not be advice per se, there's advice implicit in it).
/r/ExRedPill13/10/23 12:33 PM
2

i mean we're married so it's inevitable that we see each other every day. married for 6 years, together for 7. we averaged maybe 5 times a day for the first 4, and at least once a day for the past 3. however... most people do not have sex every day. that's not to do with sexual attraction not lasting, it's that yes, for almost everyone frequency decreases post-honeymoon period. most people do not have a libido sufficient to inspire daily sex, either, and if you're an adult who has adult responsi…
/r/ExRedPill04/10/23 06:40 PM
2

almost no one thinks or argues otherwise? some people express a preference for a more experienced partner and some people point out that experience can be a positive, as a counterpoint to guys who shame women for having had a lot of partners. that's not the same thing as claiming that it makes anyone superior.
/r/ExRedPill30/09/23 01:53 AM
1

if this were true then single women wouldn't have the highest levels of happiness out of any demographic, and men wouldn't benefit more from marriage (in both happiness and life- expectancy-- married men's life-expectancy increases while married women's decreases). all of this is explained by the fact that, despite working equal hours outside of the home, women are still often performing the majority of the domestic duties and often the vast majority of child-care. feminism recognizes that ideal…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:44 PM
3

or...when people love each other they're inspired to generosity, they desire to care for one another, and they tend to be aroused by their love interest. those are generally all natural extensions of romantic and sexual attraction more than stratagems for 'winning' the object of one's affections (barring e.g. lovebombing). we do tend to want to make a good impression, but often focus on the quality and specificity of gifts, sex, etc-- it's not that we decide to give or make love, in and of itsel…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:25 PM
1

i'd also argue that 'be more attractive' is far from the only solution. the vast majority of people are only attractive to a small percentage of the population. that's not an issue with everyone being unattractive, it's an issue with the fact that different people have different preferences... which isn't an issue at all, really. if literally no one has ever found you at all attractive then it would be worth examining self-care habits to determine if there's room for improvement, yes. if a given…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:15 PM
1

beg pardon? to what demographic is this addressed? the only people i've seen making this argument are either: fat acceptance (or FA-leaning body-positivity) advocates, incels, or on occasion women who are arguing against truly unrealistic and unhealthy standards (in which case... it's not an unfair argument-- if someone seriously thinks that any woman above a BMI of 16 is fat and unattractive that is very much an issue with them).
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 12:13 PM

uh, no. generally so-called passport bros are seeking women to exploit. they either falsely believe that women from other countries are more 'traditional,' 'feminine,' 'subservient,' or similar or they recognize that they would have a financial advantage over them and desire to use such for sexual, domestic, and social gain. women, as a whole, do score high on neuroticism as a trait. this is distinguished from anxiety. it should... really go without saying that there are very many women for whom…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 11:52 AM

i'd argue that the latter is a flawed assertion-- you can love someone very much and still divorce them if they e.g. refuse to work on their issues, treat you right, or compromise on important aspects of a partnership. for the former, though-- assuming women don't love men as much would be contradicted by the fact that studies tend to show that longevity and happiness increase for married men while they decrease for married women, or by the fact that a woman is much more likely to be abandoned b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 11:37 AM
12

i've never understood this concern. most people are going to find numerous other humans attractive-- this isn't exclusive to bisexual people. it's not like monosexuals never freaking cheat. they do all the time. so i'm not sure why people are so convinced that a bisexual person is an especially risky proposition here. cheaters cheat. cheating is not related to your sexuality.
/r/ExRedPill08/08/23 02:59 PM
1

the active partner is not the only person with input. they're not even necessarily the dominant, in bdsm. the man might more often be the one doing the literal action of thrusting but that doesn't mean the woman has no agency, or control over the situation. it doesn't mean they're the only one making a decision. if someone were to purchase you clothing, or some other gift, or cook a meal for you, at your behest... would you consider that you're just an object, or would you expect, if someone is …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 05:17 AM
1

oh yeah, i'd definitely agree that it's probably not super common for women to approach men or initiate relationships. plenty of us do, it does happen, but it does seem to be expected of men. i'm just saying it's not an impossibility that a demi man might end up in a relationship if he doesn't make the first move. i also think it depends, again, on how you define 'make the first move'. initiating a friendship is definitely something a demi man can do... and from there you have a potential opport…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 04:19 AM
1

my husband is very much demi. i'm pretty sure marriage is a type of romantic success. he started talking DMing me because we had debated each other in a group and he found me interesting. he made that move. after we talked more, privately, i made the move in initiating a sexual relationship. maybe the people here won't count it as a success, since he married me and i'm probably the type of woman that a lot of people here would consider undesirable, but we're happy with each other and have made e…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 01:53 PM
1

why does that mean she 'let's guys use her body'? how are they using her body any more than she's using theirs? do you think women don't like sex, or casual sex, or that we don't actively seek it out or decide to have it? your last line... why is it that the woman is de facto inadequate? how do you know that she's not rejecting some of the men, or that both parties aren't finding out they're incompatible?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/23 12:57 PM
1

1: i have no idea if i want to have sex with him, all you've given me is that he's attracted to me. based just on that, no i don't want to have sex with him, and i'd expect anyone i associate with to be smart enough to be able to tell that and not 'make a move'. 2: no. if i want to have sex i'll initiate it. i'd know long before that if i want to have sex with someone, too. 3: not at all. i prefer to iniate. 4: those aren't real or meaningful categories of people. 5: yes. 6: non-issue, i prefer …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 04:30 PM
4

everyone is emotionally driven, and you seem to be listing a bunch of stereotypes rather than describing actual women. when people are in a serious relationship, both of them should be hearing i love you, receiving emotional support, and having meaningful discussions. the condescending way you described all of that, especially with the specific ascription to women, is not correct, though. nor do any of those things equate to 'living for emotional validation'-- again, everyone needs some sort of …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/22 08:48 AM
4

if men are worshiping the ground women walk on and groveling then... that sounds a lot like that man is idealizing and idolizing women, which is both a form of dehumanization and a good way to set themselves up for resentment, when it inevitably turns out that woman is just a *person*, also. also, as someone who did that very thing with an ex, it's usually because they expect something in return--- which granted, yes, healthy relationships *are* reciprocal but one shouldn't be doing things with …
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 12:01 PM
3

i think it really depends on the context of the assertion. if it's relevant and supported then i tend to trust it, but when people use 'i'm so intelligent' as an attempted argument terminator or contradict their claim while making it (or just evince generally narcissistic traits) then no. randomly, irrelevantly, pompously asserting one's own intelligence can indicate insecurity, too.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 02:39 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter