TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

its_bri_ Archive

View 0 posts and 151 comments by its_bri_ on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

I’m not subject to your critique or evaluation. Your opinions are worth about what comes out of my a** when I’ve had two bottles of mag citrate.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/12/25 04:30 PM
1

There are many men who are good societally and socially. That’s why these socially flawed dudes on Reddit can’t get women. Being good in both those areas doesn’t make a guy flawless; it makes him a normal person. … In other words, charisma matters a lot more than social standing when getting your foot in the door. If you’re arguing that socially awkward men should be given the chance over men who are socially skilled, I disagree. And the chance of the guy being a criminal is actually low. There …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 07:42 PM
0

THIS 💯
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 07:32 PM
-1

This. The problem is they never actually MOVE. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 07:30 PM
-1

That’s hilarious. I actually ENCOURAGE passport bros. If they’re going elsewhere then they’re not bothering me. Shoo 🧹Problem is, they’re usually all talk. They don’t go. The ones worth our time are the ones who are staying, because we’re not hostile to them. How convenient. All for it!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 07:28 PM
1

She never disagreed with that. She was asserting that charisma is important.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 06:45 PM
1

That doesn’t mean women fall for them either way. It indicates that charisma is an important factor and should not be excluded. Let me help your flawed logic. Imagine these Reddit users had perfect - awesome - social skills. Do you think she would pick a criminal with said social skills over someone with the skills who’s not a criminal? No, she wouldn’t. Idk if it’s your flawed logic and thinking, or if you’re just hurt from being passed over due to lack of social skills, but either way, what yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:24 PM
1

True. But we discovered DNA, the water cycle, etc., right? Were they still true BEFORE we used science and observed and explained them? Yes! So DNA existed before we observed it and was not dependent on our observations. Same with the other examples. Therefore, something can be a subjective fact/truth without science or observation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:19 PM
3

Her point is that charisma matters. She didn’t say what you’re saying she said. Your lack of ability to comprehend or wanting to put words in her mouth is not her problem. And yes, she does seem to have a good point that the dudes on Reddit lack said “social skills”
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:07 PM
1

Not true. Observation itself is what makes something subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:02 PM
1

Do you go around Reddit just making up stuff?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 04:02 PM
4

Because she’s emphasizing the importance of charisma and social skills, which he left out and excluded. That’s not to say that all of these things aren’t worthy of consideration. So she had a good point that he missed.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:31 PM
1

Even verification is subjective. Look at the Munchausen Trilemma. It literally shows that nothing - even in math or science - can be an objective truth because even verification is subjective. There are plenty of things that weren’t accepted by science that are still “truths”. But all in all, everything is always still subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 03:29 PM
2

Well definitely don’t listen to the guys on this subreddit then because if you do you’ll never ask a girl out and end up lonely forever
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 10:39 AM
1

Science itself is a philosophy. So how do you define “fact”? What’s your definition?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:55 AM
2

I agree that his belief system is cultural and he seems in denial, but you’re wrong about something needing to be backed by science to be fact. The earth is round. That’s a fact that at one time (before Copernicus) was actually frowned upon. Practically our entire species thought the earth was flat (says a lot about us lol) Yes, now it’s known by science, but at one time it wasn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:54 AM
2

Sounds like me (I’m 29 and a virgin.) but I’d say more like 98.5% instead of 95 lol
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:49 AM
4

That shut him down fast haha
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:48 AM
7

I just turned 29 and have never had sex. No relationships with a man so far. It’s not from being religious so much as just that I haven’t found a man who brings anything to the table.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/12/25 09:45 AM
1

There are countlessly many more single moms than single dads. Most men who aren’t still married to the mom neglect their kids. You hate that men have been replaced by just an 8-inch stick, huh… LOL Everything you just said is rage and your angry opinion. Okay so you can’t even argue at this point. Thanks for your time.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 11:17 PM
1

You even said kids are just an extra responsibility, minimizing caring for them. As for that study, how many single father households are there compared to single mother ones? Oh, now we see where you’re wrong… WAY more single mothers! It’s the only thing men could be good for, if dildos didn’t exist. Everything has been replaced. That doesn’t destroy my argument. In today’s world both men and women exist, so everyone takes advantage of what’s available. That doesn’t say that in a world without …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 09:02 PM
1

Again, how would you take care of the kids as they grow up? You can’t answer it, can you? Women don’t need thousands of anything to replace men. Just a single 8-inch dildo. Like I said, women are auto mechanics, construction workers, etc. Women + Artificial Sperm - Men = a world of no war or fighting and much caring Let’s also recognize - AGAIN - that women have already replaced men, as dildos exist. Men haven’t replaced women yet, as AI doesn’t take care of kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 08:29 PM
1

Except you never debunked them. You’re just annoyed that you can’t and so my arguments stand. Keep crying. And YOU came trying to argue against MY post. If you’re offended that you can’t make a successful argument, how about go try to argue with your own size - babies - instead? If you can’t take the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Here’s some Kleenex and diaper wipes for ya.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 08:09 PM
1

I doubt that. That’s just a fantasy of men. If women wanted men we could get them, and thanks for admitting that men still want women. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:40 PM
1

Which part is a lie? And don’t worry, women have been laughing at men for years
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:39 PM
1

Since when? I have yet to see a man hold a baby in his body for 9 months and give birth. I’m talking about the real world here, not some made-up fantasy LOL You’re already obsolete. If you’re trying to make me feel bad, you should’ve made women obsolete before we did it to men first. Thats not what they vent about. The ones venting about shit they don’t wanna put up with are women lol Your dream world doesn’t count. Yes, women court men. Yes, women pay for dates sometimes. And yes, women are a h…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:58 AM
1

And men can’t plop babies, huh? Point proven. You proved my point without even trying. Lol Side Note: You already said kids are pointless and an extra responsibility. So in a world without women, what would you do? Go extinct? You’d either have to learn to take care of the kids or go extinct… You’d die out fast. They can. But the fact that men have already been replaced by basically an 8-inch stick and men still are trying to build an AI smart enough to replace women says everything. The same gu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 02:33 AM
1

But men are already obsolete… And what jobs can a man do that a woman can’t? I know female auto mechanics and one who works in construction. What are you referencing?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 01:56 AM
1

Well apparently the guy I replied to and the other dudes here on Reddit disagree with you because they’ve said the opposite
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 01:35 AM
1

Idk how to put it in plainer English. Yeah, that doesn’t make them romantic. Reminds me of that Miley Cyrus song: “I can buy myself flowers, write my name in the sand…” lol Weird reference but it demonstrates the point. Yeah, like I said, those things are either not worth dealing with his negatives or something that women can do ourselves, like making good income, which makes his contribution worthless. Do you think men are? If men were to claim that they would be lying… I don’t think any human …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 01:26 AM
1

Only in your dreams. You have been proven wrong and still to this point have no evidence for your claims. Several users have provided my same perspective. And “you lack critical thinking skills”… lol
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/25 01:02 AM
2

I’m glad you point out the difference. The men express loneliness and wanting to be seen by women. The women tend to demonstrate the former. You mean you can’t tell the difference between being confident enough to show emotion versus being insecure? Chad isn’t the average man. Will make us feel better that it’s one less guy complaining. Just remember, we developed this great energy first.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 10:05 PM
1

LOL Saying something isn’t valid doesn’t make it invalid. You have no “proof.”
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 10:01 PM
2

Your 3rd paragraph literally just called me correct when I say women had less freedoms then. The fact that it was even legal then is what speaks. Her being an outlier is irrelevant. It wouldn’t be legal today. And you didn’t answer my question: What more freedoms did women have back then? Because you can’t. Yes, I’ll enjoy my freedoms today. I’m a dog person, not a cat one, but my dog is still better than a man. And it can’t be cope when literally almost the entire gender would choose an animal …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 09:12 PM
2

Not according to the guy I replied to or all the men complaining on Reddit about being overlooked by women Women are more affectionate and open to showing their emotions. Men aren’t romantic except in movies. Yep. The average man isn’t worth it to women. Good luck with your objectumsexuality. One less guy we will have to deal with or listen to complain.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 09:09 PM
3

None of those things are necessities. Being alone is better than getting those things from men but having to deal with all their negatives. Women can, too. I would even argue women do some of those things better than men. For example, I myself make more money than most men do. So he’s not really offering me anything. Thankfully Chad exists. He always has much to offer. Can’t wait until you guys even get AI wives
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 08:12 PM
1

That’s still a perspective. I still see no evidence for your perspective. When are you providing it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 08:09 PM
1

Yes, I see why you have a huge problem with our argument. You hate it and can’t provide any evidence against it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 07:52 PM
1

Only in your opinion. You still haven’t proven your perspective while you continue to deny the evidence on mine. Saying our perspective is wrong IS a perspective. Yes, you’ve given a perspective that you can’t back up. LOL You have zero critical thinking skills…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 07:51 PM
1

The perspective is backed by evidence. Yours is not because you STILL haven’t provided any. So how is your perspective any more “objective truth” than ours? Ah, now you see your flaw…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:49 PM
1

Given Other users here agree with me. There’s evidence backing up my perspective and you have provided none for yours but admitted that you choose to call certain evidence “objective truth” only if it agrees with you. You like to try to insult me by saying I have poor critical thinking skills. (Which is kind of hilarious because I would only take that as criticism from a professor or someone with great skills, not a random offended guy on Reddit who doesn’t even know the Munchausen Trilemma) You…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:44 PM
1

So you can invalidate the Munchausen Trilemma? Dude, you could make millions. Let’s hear your reasoning. No, it’s subjective because evidence is based on observation, which is subjective. I gave you a study of which I am not in the authors. So it can’t be my opinion. You have no reasoning skills and definitely can’t be in grad school lmaoooo
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:37 PM
1

You deal with objective truths? Clearly someone doesn’t know of the Munchausen Trilemma. Everything is subjective. No, you’re not in grad school. Stupidville University doesn’t count lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:30 PM
1

Your opinion is a whole different story than reality. I’ll continue making As in grad school where your opinion is not even as valuable as my bowel movements.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:26 PM
1

I’m in grad school. Thankfully my professors don’t dismiss evidence and try to insult people for having evidence that proves them wrongs But what would you know about grad school 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:24 PM
1

I did. You just don’t like it. Your inability to see evidence is your poor critical thinking skills, not mine.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 06:04 PM
3

What other domains did they have more freedom in? I disagree that they had more freedom in other areas, so will be seeking your answer on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 11:40 AM
1

😂
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 11:37 AM
1

It is evidence. You just don’t like it because it contradicts your agenda. You claiming we have poor critical thinking skills when we show the data supporting our claim while you have zero support for yours that we’re wrong only helps prove us right. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 11:36 AM
1

Well I agree with them. I’ve never met someone who agreed with my views. The only one missing is anarchism.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 11:34 AM
8

And had to go back in to a controlling husband? No thanks! I can stand on a bluff overlooking sunset rn btw. Don’t need a man for that. freedom
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 01:50 AM
1

She made the argument. I provided the evidence you asked for. You kept saying she wasn’t reasoning when really she was right and you’re the one with no reasoning skills. And it proves that we don’t want marriage with men like you, obviously Again, I’m not a Special Ed teacher. The evidence is there. If you wanna try to beat around the bush and not accept it, that’s on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 01:47 AM
1

I mentioned what it says in black and white and answered you as to how that backs her argument up 100%. Can I explain it for you? Yes. Will I? No. I’m not a Special Ed teacher.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 01:31 AM
24

Lol! You could never convince me women back then had more freedom. Even your own words contradict themselves: you say she had children and a husband but got to choose whom she fed. Uhmm no because I guarantee you that man has no idea how to cook a meal. My grandma was FORCED to marry my granddad, who was 53 years older than her, at only 15 years old. He raped her all her life and cheated on her, giving her 5 kids. And they all barely made it because he was on disability almost the entire time. Y…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 01:19 AM
1

It says most divorces are wanted by the wife and that women initiate 70% of them. That supports her argument 100%. Read it for yourself. How about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/12/25 12:54 AM
1

Then don’t ?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 11:32 PM
1

Same to you. Tbh I figured if my point wasn’t so on point you wouldn’t have dismissed data as meaningless or tried insulting me and pulling stuff out of your ass. Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 07:49 PM
1

Now you’re summarizing in bad faith, because practically nothing you just said is true. People who read this can tell for themselves. The fact that you 1) dismiss data you don’t like as “meaningless” 2) pull stuff out of your ass, call it a “mistake,” then continue to do it 3) started trying to insult me by saying I’d been hurt when you couldn’t possibly know , says everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 07:06 PM
1

Wikipedia one, nope. I don’t use it as a source EVER. It’s edited freely and randomly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 06:53 PM
1

Let’s question your logic. If I haven’t even opened the article, how can I already know that it’s accurate? I brought only two as well. And actually, yeah, you did bring it back up. I said let’s argue this without social science studies at all (bc yes, it’s a joke and you even pointed out some good reasons why), and then you brought up all your criticisms against the one that shows single women are happier than single men. Yes sir, you brought studies back into the game. I never said that they d…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 06:49 PM
1

I took a class on logic in undergrad and am a grad student in a field that uses a lot of deductive logic. And again, Wikipedia is not a valid source. Yes. You wanted to come back to studies, so here we are. You just can’t ignore one that contradicts you because “it’s meaningless to you.” Everyone makes mistakes. Welcome to real life.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 06:34 PM
1

Wiki is edited freely by everyone. Will never use it as a source.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 06:26 PM
1

Love how you accuse me but don’t back yourself up. Loser behavior. They are, and that’s why I don’t like social “sciences.” Actually, you flip flop. I’m the one who offered to ignore studies completely, and you went back to one, conveniently calling the other meaningless. By my way, we could’ve left studies out altogether, but you lacked the ability to argue beyond that point. Oh my god! You admitted you were wrong! 😂 And you admit you’re wrong again… Okay, I’m shocked. Just for that I’ll give y…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 06:25 PM
1

Actually, it is sufficient. Because if women are happier when single instead of married, your OP is proven wrong. Leave it to you to find that “meaningless” bc it contradicts you. Okay, so you think >70% of divorces are filed by the woman just due to convenience? Very biased. These articles are probably more accurate to the reason: https://www.whitleylawfirmpc.com/3-reasons-why-women-initiate-divorce-more-often-than-men/ Then your misinterpretation speaks volumes. (Recap: You said I said women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 06:14 PM
1

They may not be rapists or extremes like that, but they’re not worth marrying or being with. I don’t even deny that they’re “decent people” (I have a male friend and he’s a great person), I’m saying that they’re not worth a relationship and single life is better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:54 PM
0

If staying away from men - who, again, rape, murder, etc. (talk about toxic) - makes me part of the problem, then consider me the whole entire problem. Bc I stand by my smart decision 100%. Plus, just about everyone’s behavior is toxic, men included. It started with men in history. Not with me or anyone living today. Though men today still have the tendencies and prob would if they could.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:38 PM
1

Yet Yeah, you dismissed it, saying it “means nothing to you”. You can’t provide an alternate explanation of why someone would file for divorce, while you claim there could be many other reasons. In your recap you failed to also mention where you pulled stuff out of your ass (said I was saying something I never said). To further prove my point, now you’re claiming I’ve been hurt or some crazy thing. (I haven’t, and even if I had you wouldn’t know.) Isn’t that what losers do when they… lose? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:35 PM
-1

I don’t need to be hurt. I just need to see other women hurt - both people I know and examples from history. That’s enough for me. I wouldn’t put myself in a position to be hurt, if I can prevent it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:29 PM
1

You literally dismiss the data when they don’t prove you right and go against your agenda. (Ex. That women initiate >70% of divorces) I disagree with what you’re saying about this study, but I offered to let’s dismiss studies altogether and argue from another perspective (not based on data). You couldn’t do that either; you switched back to the study you wanted to criticize but still want to ignore the one you say “means nothing to you.” You can’t argue with me. When you said the data mean nothi…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:11 PM
-2

Thanks for claiming you know me when you’ve never met me. You’re just triggered af and it shows.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 05:00 PM
1

It plainly says that “Life satisfaction was assessed using the Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985). “ That scale is a subjective measure of happiness and satisfaction used in numerous social science studies. I never said women are less happy in a divorce. I said they tend to do BETTER than men after a divorce. You’re pulling stuff out of your ass. Reasons… Him working and prioritizing other things and not having time for her is probably a good reason, yeah. Then there’s the added …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:57 PM
-4

Hurts when it comes back around, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:38 PM
1

I know it’s because they’re unhappy with the man. Otherwise they wouldn’t be filing. Oh, I believe the income thing. I don’t dispute that. Bc men are intimidated by women who make more than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:36 PM
1

It’s a cumulative of data sets of reported happiness, so yes it does. I’ve already told you you’re wrong on that. Women filing over 70% of the time and also reporting that they were the ones who wanted it - I mean… You’re just claiming it doesn’t have meaning because it hurts your narrative. Again, men don’t even do as well as women after losing a marriage. And that’s based on data, not on Reddit lol If you hate the data so much and want to deny it, that says everything.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:34 PM
1

So if men want a divorce why can’t they file? There are many examples of where the woman makes more than the man. Men tend to dislike that and file the papers in those cases. How convenient! The women know. And like I said, it’s because we are happier being single than staying with the dude. Each situation is different as for the specifics of why she files, but it all comes down to she’s not happy bc if she was she wouldn’t be filing.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:28 PM
-3

If by “got to me” you mean made me happy and rejoicing since feminism took over, yes it really got to me and I love it. The future is beautiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:24 PM
2

Okay, for your sake, let’s ignore the studies. (I’m only doing this bc I agree with you that social science is extremely subjective and therefore bogus.) In YOUR personal view, why would a woman be happier with a man than by herself? Is it enough to change >70% of women from initiating divorces? As for men’s happiness, they could be initiating divorces but they aren’t - not even half as much as women. They’re also always complaining (like here on Reddit) about being unwanted. So that side speaks…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:18 PM
0

It’s still unhappy, especially when she wouldn’t be discontent as single or in another situation. “Discontent means a feeling of unhappiness, dissatisfaction, or restlessness with one's current situation, desires, or circumstances, often involving a longing for something better. It can describe a general state (noun: lack of contentment) or a person feeling unhappy (adjective: dissatisfied) and can even be used as a verb to dissatisfy someone.” https://www.google.com/search?q=discontent+meaning&…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:10 PM
1

There are also studies in support of it. This is why social science “studies” are not my thing. Lol but alright, agree to disagree here Back to point 1. So we can mark both of these out due to the unwanted subjectivity then. With their relationship status when they were single, and men were measured the exact same way. So the women were happier, or satisfied, with being single than the men were. Disagree. Most divorces are done by women for a reason and were not wanted by the man. There are also…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 04:06 PM
1

And discontent would be the opposite of happy, right? If they were happy with the man why would they divorce him?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:58 PM
1

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_11 Rosenfeld, M.J. (2018). Who Wants the Breakup? Gender and Breakup in Heterosexual Couples. In: Alwin, D., Felmlee, D., Kreager, D. (eds) Social Networks and the Life Course. Frontiers in Sociology and Social Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71544-5_11
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:57 PM
1

Men don’t even accurately report in these surveys. It’s well-known that men don’t report their emotions openly. By what method is the happiness measured, and is it objective? Doubt it. Single women are happier than single men. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506241287960 It’s well-established that women initiate over 70% of divorces. If men were happier alone, they would be the ones initiating more divorces and less marriages. If I met some single women who were miserable or didn’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:51 PM
1

Single women are happier than single men. Women initiate >70% of divorces. (This says a lot. You don’t stay in something if you’re not happy with it.) Men are happier than women when married. Not otherwise. Which again, says a lot.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:45 PM
6

You want a family but claim you don’t need women… LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:43 PM
2

Women don’t need men 😂 Men need women more than Vice versa And if you prefer gaming over socializing with a woman, that says a lot about you. That’s not the women’s problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:42 PM
6

Makes us wonder why women don’t get bored of each other? At least there’s one thing that you admit women can give that doesn’t come elsewhere. Can’t say the same thing for men lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:40 PM
-12

Lol Thankfully! Men have never played fair either and spent most of history mistreating women. Now the men wear diapers and cry like babies at the unfairness of women. They’ll get over it!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:29 PM
2

I doubt the men on here know the true differences between sexual interest and objectification, especially given they’re open about being objectumsexual and wanting AI wives. Lmao “Objectified as an entertainment machine”? Do us a favor and stick to your AI wife. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:08 PM
-4

Actually……. We prefer that the guys you described stick with the porn and not approach us. The guys we want approaching us don’t have issues getting women and probably aren’t that addicted to porn as they get women irl. Conclusion: We want the guys who aren’t creepy freaks.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:55 PM
1

Hard disagree. Being single and much happier than you would be in a relationship is definitely worth celebrating. Especially in an individualist culture (the US)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:38 PM
1

It’s not complicated at all, and I’m not making it complicated. All I did was prove my point. I’m saying that marriage is less desirable to women. I never related the last article to men’s current desire to marry. The point of the article demonstrates that men don’t move on after losing a wife quicker or better than women do after losing a husband. In other words, just as with women initiating over 70% of divorces, losing marriage isn’t really losing to women but it is to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:28 PM
1

It is. I don’t think anybody else is having a problem comprehending what she’s saying except you. Lol You can’t claim women are happy in something if they’re the ones ending it >70% of the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:24 PM
1

Men are also the ones always on here complaining that they can’t find a mate. “Oh, thanks to hypergamy, am I just unlovable,” “Women don’t want us average guys,” etc. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/19485506241287960 Single women are much happier than single men. And in old age, men are more likely to develop depression or commit suicide after being widowed. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032719304008 Men are still wanting to marry. Women, not so much…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 02:07 PM
1

Ask pretty much ANY married woman lol
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 12:39 PM
1

I haven’t found anyone different enough that I’d want a relationship with. Closest I have come is a guy friend I’ve had for almost 7 years, who constantly shows romantic interest in me. I’m just not interested in return so we just stay strictly friends. P.S. Off topic but your listed interests (nihilism, misanthropy, extinction) interest me highly so I followed you
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 12:36 PM
1

I agree. That’s why I don’t respect social science studies anyway. But I will read the other one you sent when I get to it, nonetheless. Unfortunately, yes, confirmation bias is a thing. Lol Tbh I don’t care about the studies at all because the only person I can speak for or act for is myself, and I’m 28, happy, make more than most men, and definitely prefer to stay single than be with a man. One who could give me something new and worth my time would be a major exception. And a lot of my friend…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 06:39 PM
1

Right. The only variable should be marriage. That way one can analyze whether marriage makes them happier or unhappier.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 06:11 PM
1

That’s a good one. Okay, I have some reading to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 06:09 PM
–

Are you trying to preach to me something that’s men’s problem? I’m laughing bc I get to be with whom I want. Something you low-tier men can’t fathom #flex Not being able to be with the women you want and complaining on Reddit about hypergamy and being seen as one in a thousand isn’t a flex btw. Preach to men bc they suffer that problem a lot more than we do. Do you think being with an unattractive man that I’m not even into would be a flex?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 05:11 PM
2

EXACTLY. Single women don’t have anything making them unhappy, unless you count a pandemic, which affects everyone, not just singles. Married women do - a husband. Lol Well the pandemic affects everyone, so it’s not a valid source. Women take on more responsibility and less freedom in marriages as opposed to being single, so by that logic single women would be happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 03:32 PM
2

So you have no data showing what you’re saying. Got it. And no, I’m not studying COVID-19 or others’ daily responsibilities rn, so I have no desire to read them. But I did look at the graphs. Still too subjective based on depressing factors so no wonder happiness would decline. You need one with data and no happiness-decreasing variables at play.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 03:26 PM
3

No they don’t and other users have pointed it out to you. Obviously happiness will decline in a pandemic and when loaded with a lot more responsibilities. What would back you up is a data set showing women are less happy without the variables of the pandemic, more stress, etc. But you can’t present that, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:57 PM
1

One is about the pandemic, so of course happiness will go down. The other is about when women take on much more stressful responsibilities in daily life, which also declines happiness. So both have variables that you’re overlooking. Where is the data saying women in general are less happy without variables that obviously make anyone less happy? Show me that.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:55 PM
2

Agree. Single childless women tend to be the happiest women, at least ime
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:46 PM
5

Lol the objectumsexual stuff is funny ngl
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:43 PM
0

Do you have data that says what you’re pushing here? Because I disagree.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:41 PM
4

28 yo woman here, never married and happiest I can be. In complete control of my life. It’s not true that everyone is unhappy rn. And neither of those studies backs you up at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:40 PM
7

And worth considering that they make that choice. Yeah, it says a lot that they’re happier unmarried and without kids. If it wasn’t by their choice then you would have a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:38 PM
–

It’s not even true of everyone else. Most women share your opinion. He gave you a study about dieting and eating disorders lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:15 PM
–

LOL Are you serious or just talking out of madness? What would be the benefit of this for the woman? 😂 And damn, you guys are really desperate… and open about it 🤮
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:13 PM
–

This is it in a nutshell
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 01:38 PM
–

She prob ignored it bc she never said anything about disordered eating or dieting. Maybe she doesn’t have problems in those areas. Hilarious that you bring up a study specifically talking about dieting and try to make it apply to all 😂You’re the ignorant one, not her.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 01:37 PM
–

Men with the desirable jawline trait exist. Example: Robert Pattinson Have fun hoping you’re 4 tit woman comes along and desires you and never finding it while we all bang the top 15% of men hahaha Btw, most women want at least average intelligence in a man, so I can see why you’re excluded and not desired.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 12:15 PM
1

Lol The difference is that that doesn’t even exist. The men we are attracted to exist, they’re just the top 15-20%, and clearly you aren’t one of them. This comparison made me rofl
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 12:14 PM
2

Only older women who want kids. If she doesn’t want kids there’s no reason to regret only being with people you’re extremely attracted to. And the resentment speaks to a whole different issue entirely.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 12:12 PM
9

This is how I feel, as a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:46 AM
1

Chances are they don’t care what you want either, so no it really doesn’t. They will continue the same as if you never asked them anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:45 AM
3

It’s a problem for men. For women, it’s better to be with someone you’re actually attracted to, especially when you don’t want kids anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/25 02:43 AM
1

Oh, the defense against hypergamy is very simple: NATURE.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/25 08:59 AM
1

Better to not date at all than to be with someone you don’t want
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:31 PM
1

Keep showing that immaturity, ma’am!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/25 05:28 PM
1

Bc women would just stay with Chad for everything. One Chad, many women, no dudes like you. Triggered lmaooooo
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:41 PM
1

Yeah, that’s not saying anything, really
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:38 PM
4

Says the person who posted the stats and misinterpreted it Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 06:37 PM
0

That day won’t ever happen. Chad literally would be thrilled when all the other men bounce out and he’s all that’s left bc he has all the women with no exceptions. You definitely are not Chad. If you were you wouldn’t be making these claims on Reddit. Lmao so now you’re just making stuff up
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:20 PM
4

But you still can’t tell what your “secure relationship” would offer. Bc I have the same question.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:19 PM
5

Where are the data? Or did you make it up with a fake conclusion like you did to that one you posted, where your “conclusion” wasn’t even there because you failed to interpret a study?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:13 PM
7

I was just about to say this. Wow, OP can’t even interpret a study 😀Let’s all keep this in mind when he posts anything in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:12 PM
1

Need a 10,000 likes button 👏🏼 👏🏼 👏🏼
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:07 PM
0

If that’s the case, why can’t men decide to help themselves if there’s really a problem? Anyone dying in a war affects their families back home. Denying that shows you’re insane.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:02 PM
0

Men aren’t strong enough to do that. Men are the ones always complaining about not getting sex. It won’t affect us women. If anything it’ll make it easier for us bc Chads won’t stop having sex and we won’t even have to choose! Chad will be all that’s left 😄 Lmk when y’all unwanteds actually stop having sex. That’s a day I want to see!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 03:01 PM
1

Looks like you shut him down on that one lololol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 02:59 PM
0

Men complain WAAAAAYY more about dating problems 😂😂😂
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:39 AM
-2

What do you want to be done, then? What’s your ideal scenario? To change the game and extinguish the whole species so the losers have the same shots now? Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:35 AM
0

Because men could fix these problems themselves When women have a problem we usually do something about it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:32 AM
0

Yeah and they’re probably a virgin for a reason
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:28 AM
1

You still can’t show where I said they have to know them personally huh Lol keep coming at me, weakling. That’s what babies do :)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:24 AM
4

Fr. Wait… men aren’t getting laid enough? sheds a tear Lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:22 AM
0

I have zero sympathy for the things men whine about, since yeah, they do bring most of it on themselves. Yes, the war and deaths they bring on themselves. Yes, it primarily affects women and their kids, or whomever is back at home. How can it affect someone who is now dead? So I don’t see how that one is a contradiction. Also, if you feel that it primarily affects men, here’s an idea: Stop doing it. Lmao Men were in complete 100% control of society first. Not to mention rape all the time and it …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/11/25 07:16 AM
1

Yes, I said you said it. Because you did. Then you claimed I said it. Yet you can’t show me where I said it because I didn’t. You’re still offended and can’t prove me wrong, and you show aggravation so easily.. Appreciate it, ma’am.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 04:14 PM
1

But I never said that. You came up with it. Clearly YOU don’t know how to read. Show me where I said that, and I’ll let you have the argument. But you can’t do it :) No offense, but learning how to read might get you further with women so you’re not on Reddit being miserable and making stupid conclusions that don’t exist
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/25 05:42 AM
1

Right before I called you out on it. 2 comments ago (of yours) And I’m a woman fyi Talking to you is a waste of time ma’am
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 04:50 PM
1

So you literally say something and claim you didn’t without even being clever enough to delete it, then start calling me names because you’re triggered. Because anybody else reading this can see what you said, you know. I think you calling me birdbrain was projection haha. Have you been called that before?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 02:18 PM
0

Bullshit. They know his looks and a bit of his personality at least, possibly a bit about his status or income. When have women only been attracted to men they know personally? Are you pulling shit out of your ass?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 01:38 PM
2

I disagree. We need more than looks to be really attracted to a man. Women’s standards are higher, less desperate.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/25 02:20 AM
4

I don’t approach because I have no reason to. Not saying fear and ego might not be a reason for some but I think most just don’t have a reason to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 05:42 PM
1

Sure we can. It’s not SA because the motivation and intention is different. If there’s no sexual intention, motive, or meaning then it’s not SA. Don’t think we can? Take one to court then. The first person the judge will ask is the woman who was touched, and when she says it was fine, you’ll just be the retard. Judge prob wont even ask your opinion. Try it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 04:11 PM
0

I agree with this. Women aren’t taking that stuff to court and even if a man tried to it wouldn’t get anywhere and he would just look retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:58 PM
4

As a woman I don’t assume bad of a woman who touches me unwarranted. It’s prob a friendly gesture or she’s getting my attention. To prosecute someone for this would be crazy unless she actually tried to be violent or kept going after she’s told to stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:56 PM
3

Where I live it’s common for us to playfully smack a friend’s booty or do stuff like that. It’s like almost an every day thing if you hang out a lot. Nobody is hurt or violated, we are just being playful, and if someone felt bad they would just tell the others not to do it. On the other hand, If a man did it we would call the police immediately because their intentions are different and men are more violent and sexual. Was your gf okay with it? That’s the real issue. If she’s not, she needs to s…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/11/25 03:42 PM
2

I haven't seen any who even tried to argue that. Most are just pointing out how you strawmanned the whole thing by adding something that wasn't even a part of it in the first place. One thinking the group is ignorant, the group thinking the one is ignorant, who you think is right? haha.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/25 08:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter