Was flicking through pubmed to see what's the situation. I find this: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300595X82800078 this backs up what you said and goes against what I was led to believe: The development of gender identity in humans is a cognitive process that has no counterpart in animal behaviour and is unlikely to be based on a specific hormone-sensitive brain system. It appears that the hormone-dependent variations of sex-dimorphic behaviour in childhood can be accommoda…
Not sure what that means exactly and too much jargon from both sides is making it really hard for me to see the forest here, so please it'd be really helpful to me if people explain things a bit more simply.
our movement is not in accordance with the current norms of political correctness so simple and obvious (in hindsight) but I never thought of that. I think you're right.
It would be a lie to say there aren't misogynists here If you think there are misogynists here can you please not do the exact damn thing I'm complaining about and instead provide some evidence. other than that, good comment. As for being fans of false statistics, unless something was debunked behind my back i don't believe i am advocating anything inaccurate. it's just yet another claim with no evidence to back it up that people like citing to slander r/mensrights. edit: why are people downvoti…
