TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

itsakon Archive

View 0 posts and 546 comments by itsakon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

A perfect look at feminist strategy. They seek to normalize paranoia. Then they take control. This is literally someone having an abnormal breakdown- panic condition, schizophrenia, or whatever. And this feminist selling the idea that it’s just regular womanhood.
/r/MensRights16/08/26 12:11 PM
13

For one it’s not rare for men to be mistreated because of gender. What a joke- it happens all day every day. But also when they put these qualifiers on, you know it’s not real. They do the same thing about race. It’s not about helping people who get mistreated. It’s about asserting their rules on who gets mistreated. They want the power to define what mistreatment is valid.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/08/26 05:53 PM
1

That makes sense: “Sex and the City” told me that the 30s is some kind of sexual peak for women. They’re often very horny in that range. That tracks with real world observation. And 18-30 is peak easy-attraction for women (minimal exercise and care required). They’re flooded with attention in those years. Women are attracted to older men. A fit, accomplished, well dressed man in his 40s and up will always get tons of attention from women. And this is when marriage and life frustrations happen as…
/r/MensRights08/08/26 04:41 PM
5

We fantasize about things we don’t do.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/08/26 11:26 PM
-4

Yeah that would be the misandry. And not a single comment here is about it, and the post isn’t about it. OP even complains that he’s just a “teenager”. This is the worst feminist behavior! - Infantilizing adults. - Conflating real crimes and problems with performative petty complaints. - Creating a false “other” as part of a villainous super enemy (here it’s middle aged women). - Installing authoritarian institutions under the guise of safety. - Even your reply: projection. Which of those commen…
/r/EverydayMisandry06/08/26 10:06 AM
-5

Yeah because the feminist HR mafia installed them and it’s a protection racket. Holy Reddit
/r/EverydayMisandry06/08/26 09:47 AM
1

Yeah, because the feminist HR mafia installed them.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/08/26 02:40 AM
-17

This might be unpopular but… what? Dude was a 19 year old ADULT. He’s working at a job that he chose to do, where being in character might involve kissing. Or maybe saying bad words, even. JFC. Real misandry is obscured by this nonsense. It’s not like some women at a bar just kissed him. Which is also something any normal 19 year old should be able to cope with, fwiw. If it was a 19 year old woman complaining this way I’d say grow up. Here too.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/08/26 01:58 AM
1

Coreced into... being an emotionally present and caring partner? No? Coerced by guilt and into being a partner in the first place. If I had to, I’d bet this was always their dynamic. It’s very well known in our society. But it’s certainly the dynamic after her family’s horrific death. There is even evidence Pelle murdered them to keep it going, to keep Christian from finally ditching Dani. Right, "The act of forcing someone to do something they do not want to do No: to persuade someone to do som…
/r/MensRights04/08/26 09:21 PM
8

Dani is also deeply flawed Dani is a woman who coerced her boyfriend into a role he never wanted which was obvious, and would have ruined his life that way. Instead she murdered him. And that was her own choice. Speaking of, you should look up “coercion” in the dictionary. Because “Using threats or persuasion to obtain compliance” and “To get someone to make a choice they wouldn’t usually make” were direct quotes. Coercion is about making someone choose something. There was no choice. He was dru…
/r/MensRights04/08/26 12:02 AM
13

No, coercion is the act of coercing. Using threats or persuasion to obtain compliance. To get someone to make a choice they wouldn’t usually make. There was no choice. He was drugged and raped. He barely knew what was happening. She was indoctrinated into the cult. But they didn’t brainwash her into punishing her boyfriend. She chose that. They literally gave her the choice not to. She and the gang had been brutally made aware that these people sacrifice themselves, willingly. But she still chos…
/r/MensRights02/08/26 10:42 AM
13

Framing in this reply above: Coercion implies willingness or choice. There was no coercion. He was drugged and raped. Indoctrination implies loss of choice. She wasn’t indoctrinated into burning her partner alive. If anyone loves someone as intensely as she pretended to, they assert solidarity immediately. Assume the best, sort it out in private. She didn’t do that because that wasn’t the reality. She was in love with being in love, not him. She chose to punish him in anger and frustration at th…
/r/MensRights02/08/26 09:51 AM
21

I thought it was about equality. Right, they mislead people. Favoring women is in the name itself.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 02:19 AM
38

You have been conned. Feminism is and always was about hating men- and frequently hating women too, tbh.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/07/26 12:38 AM
–

You speak of women in a generalization. The term is “Acceptable Women”. But AW ignore and erase any woman who doesn’t fall in line with them. They speak for women and this is accepted by society and the woman majority. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t talk about “women’s issues” and then complain that individuals are generalized as women. Unless you’re talking about a cast-out fringe individual, it is ok to generalize the Acceptable Women as “women”.
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:46 PM
5

Men supposedly don’t know how to deal with our emotions, and we’re all just big dummies, because we don’t make a big showy performance of expressing them. But if we actually ever do need help with our emotions in a real way… every woman from across the whole political spectrum is quick to shame and scold us about it. Cartoon trad women are no different from feminists.
/r/MensRights05/07/26 11:09 PM
52

Yep! Men are as rude as they want and constantly interrupt everyone, and nobody cares. Nobody has ever called a guy an asshole or a dick or a douche for that. That behavior has never once lead to violence that women don’t face (or even know about). And as a man I love coming to work without any shaving or facial grooming whatsoever. Not unprofessional at all. Some days I skip underwear with tight slacks , and even though it makes visibly suggestive outlines for my body parts, nobody minds! A man…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/07/26 02:00 AM
11

There’s nothing not virtuous about wanting sex. Humans are driven to want to reproduce. We’ve got 50 years of lectures about not slut-shaming women. And even if you disagree and believe in abstinence until marriage, normal people know that we all crave sex. In the 1800s a woman could divorce a man for not satisfying her.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 08:53 PM
1

I see a lot of toxic femininity in this comment.
/r/MensRights04/07/26 10:28 AM
1

I reflect on Camille Paglia saying stuff almost 20 years ago that I didn’t really get at the time- basically that privileged women will destroy society. They’ll keep demanding more and more outrageous perks, and claiming things aren’t “fair” no matter how much society caters to them. They’ll keep heaping insults and make constant changes that weaken men in society. Then the outsiders come, barbarian men that dgaf. Then comes the next dark age.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 08:49 PM
1

The feminists and their media allies will always conflate the two. Just as they’ll always lie that radical feminists aren’t normal feminists, just before they celebrate yet another one again.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 11:08 PM
6

No, it’s a conspiracy theory and boogieman rolled into one.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 01:11 AM
6

Like sane people, I think it’s unimportant. We’re all just humans. But if they’re going to build a global conspiracy theory about this one demographic, and teach that as history… we need to reject that and look at the facts. These things are not a matter of legislations. These are revolutions and wars and the like, that straight white men have fought on behalf of humanity. And we see it with gender now. Women talk constantly about women, but men are looking out for everyone.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 09:05 AM
22

for what they have done to it. I suspect that no other particular cohort has done more good for the world. Not even close, probably. Edit for downvoters: What cohort formalized the recognition of inalienable rights? Ended the global, millennia old, oppressive system of royalty? Gave women equal standing in society? Ended slavery as a cultural norm across the globe? Invented both liberalism and communism? Invented almost every thing in your life? Pioneered almost every philosophy and science? And…
/r/MensRights30/06/26 02:18 AM
26

From the first panel- you can’t even talk to people who are so tangled up in their own dogma and nonsense. These women choose straight men. They apparently express disgust or insult towards men who don’t conform to it. That’s not a “privilege” bestowed by some magic system called “patriarchy”. That is women doing a thing.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/06/26 10:25 PM
4

Feminists are making it so that only bad guys can win in society, so to speak. As a normal woman trying to have a normal life— date fun guys and have decent male friends, have good men around, etc.— you’re the one that’s gonna have to pay the price for that.
/r/MensRights28/06/26 01:28 AM
20

Dudes rock
/r/EverydayMisandry27/06/26 09:48 PM
11

I wish I saved this link that’s from the 1970s, where a gay male protester describes how toxic the feminists were and how they kept trying to take over everything, and make it all about straight women.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/06/26 03:13 AM
1

And it proves once again that “men” are not a peer group. There is nothing I need to do, as a man, because some violent people happen to also be men. Their cult relies on this false correlation, and falsely accusing all men of made-up toxic masculinity.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 03:05 AM
1

I have known women in karate who could beat me down easily. They could work to protect themselves just as men do. I’ve also known women who lift that can lift way more than me, fwiw. And also, women throw things when they rage out.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:17 AM
-1

Your point doesn’t stand, and it’s you who doesn’t get it. “Free speech” is not real. It’s an ideal, a concept. We protect free speech because it’s better for everyone if people are free.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 12:49 PM
12

People really lost touch with what modern society even is. Nothing just happens, someone has to build it. It’s not that advertising manipulated everyone. It’s that people understood we have a chance to make things better. Society got lazy, people feel entitled to culture now. We lost that understanding, and feminism exploited it. Things have gone downhill fast.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/06/26 11:41 AM
-2

I do know what I’m talking about. Free speech is a magical shield that lets you get away with saying what ever you want with zero consequences.. and it requires people who are intelligent enough to respect your freedom to say it. If you punch me in the face because I insult feminist women, or some other particular demographic, you will go to jail. I am allowed to “spew hate” about anyone I want, and so are you. At least in the US where I live. Previously in the Western world too, but things are …
/r/MensRights25/06/26 08:44 AM
-1

Free speech doesnt free you from consequences of that speech. It literally does. The idea is that we are an enlightened society. We are all big enough to handle mean words. We are superior to the past for that reason. Which is why people who want control, like feminists, falsely try to tie that superiority to racism. Which is ridiculous. Those examples are not free speech. They are necessary breeches of free speech, and they’re treated very carefully. Every breech goes to the highest courts.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 12:41 AM
4

Loudly mocked, made fun of, and expertly debunked and criticized. But not “shamed” which is toxic feminine. And not “deplatformed” which means censorship. Never go full feminazi.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 12:34 AM
1

Yes, women should do that.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 05:31 AM
7

so she can't truly know how straight women feel This is one of the most toxic fallacies of the ‘10s. Anybody can figure out how anyone else feels. Lots of times you can even just accurately guess. We’re all people. More nuanced experiences we learn from communication and comparison. That’s how normal people exist.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/26 05:12 AM
0

I think that if a woman loses respect for you for raising a helpless kid, she’s an abnormal psycho to start with. This is exactly how feminists see the world. Not everything comes down to these weird power games. It’s just like criminals and con artists- yes they’re out there, but people are normal too. I’d agree that you have to be extra careful taking on a family, but millions of people do it every generation without evil stuff like this.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 04:46 AM
1

This is stupid and has nothing to do with Men’s Rights.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 02:15 AM
2

It’s so disappointing, how awful she is.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/06/26 02:12 AM
1

Thanks for the reply. Egalitarianism is by definition about equality. That’s what you describe above (and Feminists hate that term and movement). Obviously I agree with it- that’s my angle as well. But Feminism, by its very name, is about uplifting the feminine. Sometimes it literally has a dictionary definition about “equality”, because feminists hold institutional power. At least Webster’s does mention it’s “on behalf of women's rights and interests” though. Stupid people are overtaking moveme…
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 11:11 PM
24

I deeply love my father and my younger brother. You love those individuals who happen to be men. But you believe wacko conspiracy theories based on Hate, like toxic masculinity and to the rape culture. Feminists have even labelled a minority of misogynists as the “manosphere” as if they speak for all regular guys. The media legitimatized this term, and amplifies it, because feminism has institutional power. You buy into these ideas without a second thought. Because you hate men.
/r/MensRights11/06/26 04:10 PM
8

Yeah! It’s like they want to erase all real human experience.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 04:39 AM
11

Things we can’t have in stories anymore: tomboy girls. Atypical guys. Same sex friends. But. Jamar is a good case for “queer coded”. It’s a self aware character that reflects villains in the past, who were painted very gay-like because that manner was alien for people at the time.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 04:33 AM
5

I’ve had feminist friends with good intentions. But at some point ya gotta face what feminism actually is, and what it’s really about. (I mean I guess no one has to face anything, but still.) You’ll find that it’s honestly not a significant number of feminists who don’t hate men. They like the men they know, like their husband or dad. But they hate men as a concept. And they hate straight men who aren’t like their concept even more! They hate to be challenged. And I’m not just talking nonsense. …
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 01:13 AM
37

Anecdotal- had a friend who was pregnant but at first she just looked fat. Two different times other women just randomly insulted her in public.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 03:21 PM
13

Respectfully, you’re getting 35 downvotes and counting because feminism doesn’t agree with you. It is not the movement you likely think it is.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 03:14 PM
14

Feminists just say stuff- anything that’s anti men. Pretty much every week in the news there’s some teacher who can’t keep her hands off a 13 year old boy. Why would this idea connect to… “the more power men have”? It’s presented this way, along with the spicy verb “fuck”, for a reason. It’s to promote the feminist fantasy that sex is about power (rather than connection) for men. I’d say that’s more often a female desire- there’s a billion dollar industry of books where women submit to men. Ever…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 02:59 PM
46

Men don’t just take martial arts because they’re not safe on the street, men invented martial arts because they’re not safe on the street. If you tell them, they just look at you like you’re speaking Ancient Egyptian.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/06/26 12:54 AM
1

Correct, people of color don’t exist and “non white” is stupid nonsense.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/06/26 02:16 AM
11

There is no such thing as “POC”.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/26 03:01 AM
36

It’s always funny to see them complain about men doing things they cheer women for.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/06/26 11:26 PM
11

Perfectly encapsulates how retarded society is right now. No one is “out of anyone’s league”; that’s a stupid way to view human life. But they think like that- they don’t even question it. It’s just useful fodder for their feminist hate.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/26 12:53 PM
2

Mountains of feminist “theory” that’s just one what-if assertion on top of another.
/r/MensRights30/05/26 12:37 PM
1

“Aftercare”. Ew. Sounds so gross and medical.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/05/26 12:10 AM
13

I have an opposite line of thought, that “sexualization” is a feminist made-up construct. Created to demonize the natural occurrence of normal sexuality, which they can’t control (and thus hate). Some of them try to say they’re “sex positive feminists” but that’s a joke. There’s no such thing. It’s inherently incompatible. Like anything else, sexual attraction can be warped into a framework for insult. No different than calling smart people nerds or muscular people meat-heads, etc. I think this …
/r/MensRights29/05/26 09:45 PM
1

Rape is not a nonconsensual sex act “plus power”. Men do not hold power over women. There is no patriarchy.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 11:00 PM
18

Right, so instead of swimming safely in designated areas or other proven approaches… they’ll outlaw swimming. Then they’ll outlaw walking on the beach. Then they’ll outlaw bright swim suits. Then they’ll outlaw all swim suits. Then it’s no swimming in swimming pools. None of it will make sense but they’ll bury the arguments in fancy faux academic jargon. Dorsal Fin Theory. Scaleism. Lots of slogans about how society is “shark infested”. Everyone will be miserable. Women will all keep swimming on…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 06:26 AM
1

Right, so instead of swimming safely in designated areas or other proven approaches… they’ll outlaw swimming. Then they’ll outlaw walking on the beach. Then they’ll outlaw too bright swim suits. Then they’ll outlaw all swim suits. Then it’s no swimming in pools. None of it will make sense but they’ll bury the argument in fancy faux academic jargon. Dorsal Fin Theory. Lots of slogans about how society is “shark infested”. Everyone will be miserable. Women will all keep swimming on the down-low. I…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 06:20 AM
1

Right, so instead of swimming safely in designated areas or other proven approaches… they’ll outlaw swimming. Then they’ll outlaw walking on the beach. Then they’ll outlaw bright swim suits. Then all swim suits. Then no swimming in pools. None of it will make sense but they’ll bury the argument in fancy faux academic jargon. Lots of slogans about how society is “shark infested”. Everyone will be miserable. Women will all keep swimming on the down-low. But whenever one gets hurt it’s proof of how…
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 06:10 AM
1

This kind of thinking still centers women btw. Well yes, he’s “centering women” because it’s normal to want to be friends and mates with the opposite sex if you’re not gay. Of course he’s centering women- the recently vile behavior of women is the problem! What if they never "get their shit together" hmm? Then the West will crash and you’ll be made into slaves, most likely. But holding a grudge against half the population for something that is out of our control It’s not the half of the populati…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 03:02 AM
3

you wonder why women don't feel safe around men at all.. Normal, mentally healthy women do.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 02:35 AM
1

They don’t have advantages in life because they’re guys. No one does. That’s just feminist claptrap.
/r/MensRights20/05/26 01:32 AM
6

They’ve hijacked both words
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/26 06:09 AM
16

Never date a women who says “problematic”
/r/EverydayMisandry17/05/26 12:52 AM
1

Your logical criticism with is not possible under this thing we made up, b srs
/r/EverydayMisandry13/05/26 04:39 PM
–

“I know it’s always men because I know all about men. But look at these men who think they know all about women. Because men need to stop calling out how women behave. Because men don’t know how to behave. And when men get called out for how they behave, they get a free pass from other men. Because men never call out othe behavior other men. Every woman knows this. So you men calling out how men behave are admirable. Because patriarchy.”
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 04:07 PM
1

“I know it’s always men but also look at these men who think they know about women. Because men need to stop calling out women’s behavior with men like this. Because men don’t know how to behave around women. And when men get called out they get a free pass. And patriarchy.”
/r/EverydayMisandry10/05/26 03:55 PM
1

Feminists are just tradwives that lie to themselves.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/05/26 10:19 PM
1

It’s something people who hate men would say. Also worth realizing that “misogyny”, like “patriarchy” are not real words with actual meanings for them. They’re just vibes. They translate roughly as “the dark side of the force”. When they discuss misandry it’s not an honest discussion; it’s more like a comedian fighting to hold their status at a dinner party. What they a say will likely be meaningless. That’s why they love slogans and quips. It’s a just an ego battle.
/r/MensRights03/05/26 03:46 AM
1

Answer: It was created by the people who benefit by it. Do men benefit by it?
/r/MensRights02/05/26 01:12 AM
2

Noted
/r/MensRights01/05/26 02:35 AM
1

I both mowed lawns and babysat as a teenager. I would definitely hire a male babysitter over a weirdo feminist like her. Especially with that creepy hate-smile after she says “then”. Whoah.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 11:23 PM
65

“Made him cry” —they loved tacking that onto the title.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 08:19 AM
12

40 year old women are out there bangin’ 18 yr olds to the point that it’s an ancient trope. Pool boys, former students, bad boys, son’s friend, guys home from college, coworkers... The only reason they’re not marrying them is because the option’s not usually available.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/04/26 08:17 AM
1

I’ve always known feminism to mean equality between genders because that’s what feminism is. That’s what egalitarianism is. Feminism is and always was a supremacist movement.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 03:17 AM
1

What misogyny? We are in this weird era of phony constructs. Misogyny means hating women- nothing else. Feminists have done this amazing job of tricking people into mental frameworks. We now have these “power words” that don’t mean anything so much as carry a vibe. That power is then backed up by a vague assertion of deep academic knowledge (a vibe itself) and you need to go “educate yourself”. Except you can look up all this supposed “theory” and it’s not hard to comprehend at all. It’s just bo…
/r/MensRights30/04/26 01:34 AM
1

You left the “wo” off of woman
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:02 AM
6

You should complain to admin that you now feel “unsafe”. I bet that would have a serious effect.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:00 AM
24

Literally nobody says these things about women. I’m sure it feels very oppressive when someone advises you not to get wasted and walk around a bad area at night. But that’s not saying anything like these replies.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/04/26 01:33 AM
21

Every single thing in this video was invented by a man. From the car itself to the seatbelt to her glasses to the plastic that makes her glasses to the machines that made her hoodie (and her hoodie). Also the hair gel. And the lip gloss. And TikTok.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/26 11:48 PM
1

Every single thing in this video was invented by a man. From the car itself to her glasses to the machines that made her hoodie (and her hoodie).
/r/EverydayMisandry26/04/26 11:44 PM
1

Katy Perry grew up in the chill, sex positive 90s. Her pals all came of age and rebelled against it, just as sure as "Superbad" feels like a 1984 movie. All through the 00s - the "Naughties"- they escalated this edgelord behavior. They didn't just do it, they actively shamed any guy who didn't do it as a nerd. And they rewarded any guy who did with sex. They normalized this outrageous dgaf! sexual antagonism. Which left a whole new subculture of "incels" who understandably couldn't figure how me…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:39 PM
5

just because every woman you approach rejects you Oh nooo I’m so embarrassed! I feel soooo bad about myself now! Wow you really cut me to the bone with that one! Funny that sexual shaming and body insults are instantly where your mind goes when challenged. Frankly it’s pretty common with women. You don’t give a shit about Afghanistan, lol. FWIW: Thousands of men (and women) went to Afghanistan to help liberate those women, and they apparently didn’t do anything much to help. We are talking about…
/r/MensRights26/04/26 02:13 AM
2

“Rape culture” is a nonsense construct that feminism just made up. Around 1999 Salon set out to be the new intelligent website “of record”. They had thought provoking articles; they were industry leaders as the internet kicked off. Then a feminist took over and it crashed in months, and within several years they had become a complete joke. Now they’re like what tabloids used to be.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:34 PM
13

Misogyny means a contempt or hatred for women. There is literally nothing in our mainstream culture that reflects or supports that. If you want to stretch “misogyny” to mean “oppression”, then guess what! There is literally nothing in our culture or social systems that oppresses women. In fact women have it easier across the board than men. A a man saying something on the internet that hurt your feelings (or woman in real life calling you fat or ugly) does not equal systemic oppression of women.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 07:19 PM
22

Yeah but women have ai boyfriends because men are terrible and need to do better. Teenage boys have ai girlfriends because they want “maximum control”. (/s)
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:06 PM
12

Misogyny means contempt for women. None of these examples of 1950s cartoon chauvinism reflect misogyny.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/04/26 09:44 PM
1

It’s a perfect language trick too. If someone says “toxic water”, we know what water is and that toxic is a deviation from it. But “masculine” is subjective, just a vibe. Plus we didn’t even use “masculinity” very often because from the 80s to the mid 00s, the previous generation had a culture of rejecting labels. So adding “toxic” to the recently underused word “masculinity” makes it sound like description of the vibe itself. A compound noun. And they know that. In an all male prison system, “m…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 10:59 AM
2

And aside from the gender and age issues: We are endlessly paying the cultural price for their little “sleaze” decade. Hope it was worth it for them. This demographic grew up incredibly easy between the Reagan boom and the chill 90s and then the Y2K tech boom. I get that 9/11 was very grim. That’s kinda their go-to. But the behavior they actively shamed people into during the 2k00s pretty much wrecked our culture. We’re still dealing with the backlash they caused. Then they all went radical femi…
/r/MensRights20/04/26 09:23 PM
12

“it's not all men, but it's usually a man"? You mean for inventing every single good thing in your whole life? Sounds about right
/r/MensRights19/04/26 07:24 PM
18

It’s like telling a person who experienced SA or similar that “Nah, c’mon, I’m sure it wasn’t so bad” No, it’s not like that at all. It’s like saying “somebody who lived in the same town as my great great great great grandfather reportedly suffered SA. But that town was my people! And you should be beaten and raped because you dare question this account of my people!” That’s what it’s like. — in other words, completely hysterical.
/r/MensRights19/04/26 12:04 PM
3

It's so ridiculous. For one, CNN basically made it up. They used the total number of people going to a complete porn site, 62 million, as "men" going to a supposed "rape academy". Wonder how many millions of women go to the totally true step-sibling academies online. We're in the midst of a "romantasy" fiction boom for women with all kinds of violence and bestiality. You can go on reddit's kink subs and easily find tons of women into crazy dark things, let alone online in general. I've even talk…
/r/MensRights19/04/26 04:00 AM
2

It’s a founding story in Judaism. And thus the Bible (Genesis), which Western society was built upon. I agree with people that Christianity dials things up to an anti-woman degree. But it also deals with the kind of behavior and things that women actually do.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/26 01:47 PM
7

Wait so people can consent when they’re blackout drunk?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/04/26 01:43 PM
18

You just falsely accused someone of writing “justifications” because they proved you wrong. Yikes indeed.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:45 AM
2

It’s exactly what feminism was meant to be about- anti male rhetoric goes all the way back to the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848. There’s so many arguments against this little slogan. But none of them are fun and snappy like a slogan, which is why slogans make good propaganda.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:50 AM
1

It’s exactly what feminism was meant to be about anti male rhetoric goes all the way back to the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:32 AM
15

Women do things like this all the time. You can find them in the News. It’s ridiculous to compare insane horror movie behavior to “misogyny”.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/04/26 01:36 AM
6

And nothing about that scenario harmed anyone in any way. Even if they hadn’t agreed to it, which they did. Even if they couldn’t leave at any time, which they could. If this was a crazy person at a bus stop, it would be like “ugh.” But this was an event they verbally bought tickets for. And hung around for. It’s just another case of women playing the damsel in distress when it gives them something.
/r/MensRights12/04/26 08:15 PM
10

Just like 5 years ago nobody was talking about male height this way. Women like tall guys and men like big boobs, it’s a trope or sometimes a tendency, that’s it. No big deal. This drama and hostility about it is all a function of the current TikTok wave of young women, and I’ll be so glad in a couple years when they age out of relevance. They’re already closing in on 30.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/04/26 04:13 AM
4

They really can’t see how awful they are.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 12:33 AM
1

Where is this urgent misogyny? I’m so tired of this fairytale concept. There is no “misogyny” in our society.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 11:51 PM
12

“Nothing you’re saying makes any sense. Obviously you’re too gross to get laid and it’s made you irrational.” You can’t argue with hate; just use their incel paradigm against them.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/04/26 10:14 PM
11

Mean girl fatigue
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/26 12:05 AM
1

The statistics are off because men don’t report.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 01:17 AM
1

LOL. Most people have seen women become unhinged and uncontrollably violent, at some point. And if you ask around (or read news reports going back centuries), you’ll find this applies to wives and girlfriends. —The classic illustration of a raging wife with a frying pan or rolling pin exists for a reason.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 05:13 AM
1

You’re lying. Teach women not to lie.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 05:43 AM
27

It’s too bad women aren’t allowed to learn self defense or even carry weapons as men do.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/03/26 01:52 AM
12

Two separate categories. Perception of threat is something women discuss from normal levels to complete hysteria. It’s not hostile to acknowledge some women wield it like a tool. Feminists constantly talk about how society needs to change because “women aren’t safe” or even just “feel unsafe”. Creepy is the word those women use when they can’t claim safety. It allows them to define a target as undesirable when they literally got nothing on ‘em. It’s a tactic of social control.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 04:13 AM
21

Feminist women are dogmatic conformists. Likewise they want men who conform to what they think men are supposed to be like. Feminists are the biggest Trads out there. They just want one they can control.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/02/26 08:34 AM
7

Old? That was just a couple year-
/r/MensRights27/02/26 03:23 AM
1

Yeah they’ll spout out the most vile bigoted stuff if people don’t behave how they want. And they honestly think everyone else already thinks that way.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/02/26 12:21 AM
6

No such thing as “whiteness”. Why would I trust a racist not to be sexist, let alone speak for my experience.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 10:04 AM
1

They always got the most clever quips on being sexist and racist pieces of shit. Imagine if they ever put that wit to anything other than complaining about men.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 12:39 AM
1

What a crazy idea for a class. Jeez, must’ve been that time of the month.
/r/MensRights22/02/26 03:57 AM
12

Women do all those things, and reward men who do those things, and socially punish men who don’t do those things.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/02/26 06:53 AM
2

It applies to almost every invention and innovation in the human race. They’re trying to obscure that fact by applying it to bad stuff. Except women do lots of bad stuff.
/r/MensRights07/02/26 09:31 AM
1

“Land of the Giants”
/r/EverydayMisandry02/02/26 09:58 AM
6

Oh noooo. Anyway
/r/EverydayMisandry01/02/26 02:31 AM
3

If you support equality or men’s issues in any way, you are not a feminist. You are egalitarian. That is all.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/26 10:46 AM
5

LOL Just the opposite. Afghanistan really showed how women cannot seem to liberate themselves or build anything, even with the whole might of America and Europe trying to help them.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/01/26 01:42 AM
3

Straight men invented social media. And computers.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/01/26 06:31 AM
3

If I ever hear a single person say “it’s always those immigrants”, I’ll note they’re as bigoted as women saying it’s always a man. Still, immigrants are a single peer group, men are not.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/01/26 02:21 AM
1

Teach women not to lie.
/r/EverydayMisandry18/01/26 02:52 AM
12

Every single thing she listed is what happens. The blindness of feminism is just crazy.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/01/26 08:00 AM
21

I think that term was coined at least 30 years ago. Every generation was afraid of talking to women romantically; everyone has approach anxiety. It’s just that before it was for normal reasons, now it’s because they might publicly ruin your life over nothing.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 01:16 AM
7

Bigotry always has a conspiracy theory. I find it hilarious when they’re like “yeah but privilege blah blah patriarchy blah blah in standpoint theory blah blah…” like it’s not just a bunch of stupid nazi garbage they made up.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/01/26 03:12 PM
21

Yeah, this heinous tragedy is cut and dry, and it could happen to boys or girls. But right now we have a situation where women routinely label very different things with the blanket term “rape”. Some are obviously valid- like anyone would agree that unwanted sex when you’re unwilling but unconscious fits that term. However women and some governments don’t extend that reasoning to men and boys. We know that males get erect involuntarily, but they don’t care. That is the real issue with women’s at…
/r/MensRights04/01/26 02:45 PM
6

Men are expected to do things, and thus everything that is done is blamed on men.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:51 PM
1

Hot take- without young men to do their dirty work, young women would quickly make up for those crimes. Or age gap relationships would mysteriously come into vogue and crime among 40something men with 20something girlfriends would skyrocket.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/01/26 02:26 PM
8

Never try to please them. Never apologize. Consider rejecting the “ally” fantasy; be a friend instead. Or even just a regular person. They use that word to other you. Using the construct of a pretend war that nobody’s really fighting, they can say your very existence is inherently immoral.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 01:01 PM
9

I wonder how Dworkin would feel about their softening of her appearance. Guess I’m glad whenever they show what feminism really is though.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 12:28 PM
1

No such thing as patriarchy in our society. The construct of “colonialism” is simply a tool for classism. Feminism is not, and has never been, about seeking for equality. * TERF pipelines are just typical feminist behavior. This is all very cringe.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/12/25 03:43 PM
1

If I gave you 10 M&Ms, Except a large number of those gruesome M&M deaths were actually falsely reported. And also there are Skittles in the bowl, some of which are poisonous, and you’re leaving that fact out. And also, it’s not M&Ms in the bowl at all- but a wide variety of candies. You just pretend they’re all one M&M group if they’re not Skittles. It’s actually pretty easy to guess which candies are poisonous and every effort has been made to help you avoid them. But you pretend that’s not so…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 03:30 AM
4

“Man” and “you guys” are frequently gender neutral.
/r/MensRights29/12/25 07:27 PM
19

Got some time to kill... From the start there’s a lie. Women expect men to be breadwinners. They literally say it all over TikTok and YouTube; we see it now with the trainwreck that is current dating. They’ve always said it. Many women don’t care about that; they just want a good person. Awesome. But they’re quick to say so. Why? Because the default, the norm, is that women expect men to be a capable breadwinner. Every other thing has to do with practical logistics. The real world. It’s funny th…
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 03:40 PM
9

Whooooo cares. But if I had a dollar for every time I’ve heard a woman say she refuses to read anything by a white man, I could buy a Norman Mailer hardback or something.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 10:27 PM
28

It’s such a good propaganda technique; I mean it’s really hard to argue against something so stupid. Slogans work. Cults always use handy sayings like this and snappy new terms to brainwash people. Feminism does both. You have to confront why it’s wrong, which is inherently verbose to do, and has you playing defense from the start. I kinda think pointing all this out- illuminate what they’re doing- might be a good strategy to derail it.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/12/25 04:11 PM
3

It’s such a garbage show in general. Just the utter shit-stain of 2k00s people. In every single thing I’ve seen her in, Kaley Cuoco personifies feminine toxicity too.
/r/MensRights27/12/25 12:47 AM
1

Not really- I wanted to match the level of irritation their comment hit. I could’ve just left a one line zinger and Redditors would rejoice. But I figured hey why not. Let’s disappoint u/No-Cat-2597 and the others.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/12/25 07:01 PM
-5

As your comment shows, this topic is discussed literally every hour of every single day in our society. It wouldn’t affect the Overton line I mention above… even if it was a real conversation. But also, it’s not. It really is a perfect example of manufactured fear mongering to control a narrative. Technique: Talk about the culture of remote areas as if it’s the whole. In reality, the whole Nation made it specifically illegal to discriminate in that way. Fought to restore and uphold those rights …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/12/25 04:10 PM
1

As your comment shows, this topic is discussed literally every hour of every day in our society. So that constant noise wouldn’t affect the Overton line I mention above… even if it was a real conversation. But also, it’s not. It really is a perfect example of manufactured fear mongering to control a narrative. Technique: Talk about the culture of remote areas as if it’s the whole. In reality, the whole Nation made it specifically illegal to discriminate in that way. Fought to restore and uphold …
/r/EverydayMisandry22/12/25 04:04 PM
1

Almost everyone else is sometimes “white” sometimes not, depending on the agenda
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:55 AM
2

That number would include the newborns, recently up from 11% if it’s accurate. People often overestimate the size of the black population because of media.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 05:14 AM
39

I think we’ve just become too distanced from 19th and 20th century racist propaganda. War cartoons, etc. It seems like 20 years ago most people would still see through this messaging, even feminists. But it’s like we hit an Overton line and crossed it.
/r/EverydayMisandry22/12/25 04:59 AM
5

More like 45… Black people are 12%, and at least some of them call some of them “passing”. Almost everyone else is sometimes “white” sometimes not, depending on the agenda. 2/3 of the population is straight up Euro. And in places like the UK the numbers are wildly more severe. Those unrealistic quotas really cripple functioning societies.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 04:48 AM
1

It’s not that they only mean a percentage of men. They mean all men. It’s just that most men are invisible to them.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 01:19 AM
1

It was a misread on my part; I thought this replied to a comment further up.
/r/MensRights21/12/25 02:54 PM
1

Not really? Can you give any examples?
/r/MensRights20/12/25 11:58 PM
23

Damn she actually is speaking straight facts here, most women like… Yeah, and she’s using shaming manipulation to get what she likes. She wants you to be compliant in society, punished constantly in public for “toxic masculinity”. Broken. It makes her the boss. But then she wants you to take on all the risk, danger, and decision making in secret when it conveniences her. That’s what “dominant & assertive” means- it’s a scam. I don’t know much about the passport bro thing but obviously it’s a thr…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 10:18 PM
1

I'd bet many or most. This is actually a feminist way of thinking- that men only ever do things to "steal" sex from them or gain social dominance. As another pointed out, men can have (wrong) ideals and want to be friends with people who share those big ideals, and also have normal sexual desires on the side. Or even hope to find a relationship partner- how terrible! These women then crucify them for normal sexual desire and if they ever even do wise up, it's too late. The feminists will destroy…
/r/MensRights10/12/25 01:56 PM
2

Oh but they do. We all need to “decolonize our bookshelf” because the “future is female”. I guess it’s a testament to the power of women that they were able to utterly sink Star Wars.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/12/25 08:43 PM
22

which we don’t talk about much It is all they talk about.
/r/EverydayMisandry06/12/25 11:03 AM
2

It absolutely is. You’ve got women here saying a man should never even change is seat in their presence, ever.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 11:45 AM
3

Because the stigma of false accusation is even worse than the stigma of being “despoiled” via rape used to be… which was pretty bad. And women know this, which is why they do it. It’s very similar to rape itself. The stigma is so bad there’s even a chance it will bring murder from vigilantism.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 03:22 AM
2

One: It’s propaganda meant to destroy the freedom of modern dating (and fairly successful). “Men” don’t kill women, criminals and psychos do. And men are killed and attacked by criminals and psychos at exponentially higher rates than women are. Note that women are allowed to take self defense classes, buy guns, and avoid bad parts of town. Women are allowed to do everything men do to avoid criminals and psychos. But that’s the real world. The objective is to make it seem impossible, and to cast …
/r/MensRights04/12/25 02:35 AM
5

What is the patriarchy we live in? Because I saw on the news that a lot of men went and fought the patriarchy in Afghanistan… and the women there didn’t lift a finger to help. While it took a long time to get marriage equality for gay people, it was men that made it happen. I hate to use Hillary Clinton as an example, but she’s just one of millions of women who feel that a marriage is as a marriage has always been, between a man and a woman. (Until it was politically expedient to switch, in her …
/r/MensRights30/11/25 09:29 PM
8

Well, just keep trying to think it through, I guess. Men invented paracetamol, just like men invented almost every single thing in your life. And men invented the system of fairness and laws that allows you to thrive. That’s the context. We don’t acknowledge that… because “men” are not a single group. Men do these things for everyone, not every man. There is no “men” until feminists want a group to blame. If someone wants to talk about how “men” do bad things, because of a few men, they need to …
/r/MensRights30/11/25 06:00 PM
14

You will never hear someone say “My head hurts; sure am glad a man invented ibuprofen. Boy I’m hot today; I’m glad men invented air conditioning.” etc. Men are only a peer group when feminists want to villainize us. When it’s something bad, suddenly men are all one thing.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 04:02 PM
17

No, it’s the descriptor (correct or not). Women would be the generalization. Except it also isn’t, because “women” means acceptable women by default. They make sure of that. They erase any women who don’t fit. So talking about “women” is inherently different from talking about men. Not comprehending this, or pretending not to, is how feminists get away with their bigotry- by roping us all in with criminals. It’s why they put so much effort into the sarcasm against saying “not all men” and preten…
/r/MensRights30/11/25 03:37 PM
26

It’s funny whenever they try to say “poor oppressed men” sarcastically. Like yeah, stupid: in all of history, all over the world, there are oppressed men.
/r/MensRights30/11/25 03:34 PM
1

Millions of women are against abortion.
/r/EverydayMisandry28/11/25 10:39 PM
40

Whoooo cares.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:36 AM
69

Is objectifying yourself as some kind of prize and then chastising and insulting everyone you consider not worthy of it what you call “confidence”?
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:34 AM
25

I don’t even think the male loneliness epidemic exists. Women ruined dating. Feminists have pretty much killed the sexual revolution. In general, their demographic has become kinda awful lately. Men and women alike started to notice this and talk about it and then suddenly… here’s all this discussion and media about the “male loneliness epidemic”.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:16 AM
1

Who set up the modern system of equality for all? Men.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 07:05 AM
1

Who fought to end patriarchy in Afghanistan? Men. Who helped usher it in? Women. Who utterly ignored it? Feminists. This has always been the general pattern. Men set up systems; women don’t do anything; rich ladies scold everyone. Who set up the Modern system of equality for all? Men.
/r/MensRights26/11/25 06:41 AM
67

I’ve been thinking about how they …infest, too. I refuse to use the proverbial “white women” even though it’s so catchy. But when the acceptable middle class women get into power, that’s precisely who they look to hire. Check out your local Starbucks. But also look at publishing, healthcare, media, tech jobs, the comics industry, libraries, teaching, psychology and therapy, etc. If they can, these women will dominate in a very tribal way (while preaching about discrimination and needed “diversit…
/r/MensRights22/11/25 09:59 AM
11

Women are not disadvantaged. I doubt anyone in history had it quite as easy as Western women now.
/r/MensRights22/11/25 02:08 AM
1

Because they hate men.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/11/25 12:24 AM
1

I’m pretty over the “they feel powerless” excuse. They’re not powerless. And they’re just getting worse and worse because nobody will call out their behavior. People are still chastising men for chauvinism that happened in the 1950s.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 04:28 AM
3

Pro America liberal pragmatist.
/r/MensRights19/11/25 02:30 AM
4

This post is so well-put. And hey, since society always uses women as a victimhood stand-in: they’re really harming future women too. When you create a culture that despises normal good men (as they are), only bad men can prevail. They’re setting gender relations back generations, just so they can feel empowered.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 11:18 PM
1

and with good ol' fashioned evidence. There is a reason people have to be proven guilty, rather than not guilty. Are you asking for proof that women do this? There have been YouTube compilations full of women on video doing it. There is the Tea app and AWDTSG full of women doing it. There are celebrity cases like Aziz Ansari, Johnny Depp, various lead singers, etc. But there are only going to be so many concrete examples. There are anecdotes stories of women falsely accusing, or threatening to, …
/r/MensRights15/11/25 06:05 AM
1

Well yeah. But I’ll be so glad in a few years when we get beyond this generation’s boomer phase, and stop calling people losers.
/r/MensRights15/11/25 04:00 AM
12

I make sure I’m not dressed provocatively.. I love it when they frame any sense of self preservation as some kind of ironic burden that no one else has ever experienced. You mean I can’t wear see-through slip dresses in the ghetto? What? We need to talk to men! Meanwhile… yeah dude. I literally do that. All men do. If a man knows the boss’s wife is “trouble”: sexually aggressive and a possible false accuser, he avoids her and avoids leading her on. It’s been in movies and such since I was a litt…
/r/EverydayMisandry09/11/25 02:36 PM
4

They’re completely reveling in their privilege, and driving gender relations to a crash. I mean they really are ruining everything for younger women and men alike. At best it will stay contained to “Pop culture”. But… can Rock and Roll fix this? And at worse, who even knows. Either way, there will be a puritanical backlash. People will crave stability. When you call all the shy, good men “sex pests”, only the bad men can prevail. When you spend half the time chastising men for wimpy feelings and…
/r/MensRights09/11/25 12:45 AM
17

Because men are not a peer group. Also, men have proven repeatedly that they consider every demographic on issues, while women primarily obsess about women.
/r/MensRights07/11/25 05:22 AM
8

Frasier? The dad was a senior citizen reconnecting with two middle aged professionals. The 90s people refer to with this sentiment is the second half of the 90s, ie the “90s-00s” mentioned here. It’s a Post Simpsons development. My Two Dads came from the 80s. Blossom ran from 90-95. Both shows exist to portray the oddity of domestically capable men- a craaazy exception, not the rule. Even so, it’s optimism from the post-feminism culture of the early 90s (which feminists desperately want to erase…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:55 PM
22

who are shown always have this super tragic backstory of abuse by their father I noticed that a few years ago too. Women villains (on the rare occasion they exist) always get an explanation. Always. And it’s going to be an abusive husband or father. A couple years ago The Penguin backstories made me laugh out loud. He’s a dirt poor crippled fat kid, but his troubles akshually just come down to misinterpreting others. Typical male, right? She’s a beautiful rich young woman, but surprise! Her no-g…
/r/MensRights01/11/25 12:02 PM
1

OR… you have no idea what a good man is, or even what society says a good man is. Let alone the pressures and mixed messages a man faces for trying to be a good man. You have no clue an about men at all. And you don’t even see how your statement would favor women, even if was true. Because you’re a crap woman.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/10/25 02:30 AM
1

The man with the story is the victim. Why do you doubt the victim?
/r/MensRights12/10/25 03:07 AM
1

Stop apologizing for body shaming.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 08:06 PM
1

That’s not a distinction.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 07:54 PM
1

There’s no “pearl clutching” and I doubt anyone finds my statement disingenuous.
/r/MensRights08/10/25 12:39 PM
9

Irrelevant. They are the ones pushing insults like “small dick energy” now (not really something a dude would say), after decades of men helping them fight against body shaming. And Gen Z women are definitely the ones normalizing this height shaming, which wasn’t even a thing like just a few years ago.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 06:38 PM
9

You are not agreeing with me. I’m not talking about body metaphors, nor am I referencing some “simmering resentment because of childhood trauma”. In fact, I highly resent that comment because it’s condescending, and it shifts the problem back onto men (or women) being insulted for their bodies. What a joke. It has nothing to do with supposed “trauma”, which most people don’t have, nor “co opting” that trauma. Like we see all over this post: that is the commentary of someone granting themselves p…
/r/MensRights07/10/25 02:39 PM
12

Folks on this post are really not grasping the toxicity of judging people by their bodies. Let alone doing so based on the aesthetic whims of women. It’s nothing like having a chip on one’s shoulder or sniffing out answers, etc. Those are indeed simple body metaphors.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 01:28 PM
18

You have little brain energy. See that’s not body shaming because it’s a fantasy spin on your cognitive abilities. The brain serves a purpose, and I’m saying you’re deficient in that way. If someone has little dick energy, it’s saying their bravery, strength, charisma are tied to the size of their penis, simply because women like the aesthetic of a large one.
/r/MensRights07/10/25 12:06 PM
2

Exactly. This used to be and should be common sense.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 02:44 PM
1

Women do it every hour of the day.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 01:03 PM
4

For the same reason people rape, for one. Maybe the primary one. Convenience is another. Protecting reputation. Also… what if a woman kept coming on to me, touching me without consent, flirting. And I shouldn’t give in because I just started dating someone, but she’s really hot and I kinda wanna give in. And so I go back to her place, and we’re kissing and I’m gonna cut it off there, but then she kinda pushes me into the bedroom… we have sex but I’m not sure about it the next day. Feminism has c…
/r/MensRights04/10/25 12:58 PM
1

Lying. I have tons of posts here; anyone can check my history.
/r/MensRights04/10/25 08:42 AM
3

Talk to most fat girls, gals who grew up like a guy. Without anyone looking at them twice , let alone the constant attention that even basic women grow up with. That “girls don’t care about sex” thing disappears instantly. (Or look at most erotica writers.)
/r/MensRights04/10/25 02:11 AM
2

It’s so stupid. They have nothing. They were just told what to think about it. And Freedom of speech is literally freedom from consequences. That’s why people taught children the “sticks and stones” limerick for a century or more. Because we need to tolerate speech we don’t like as a free society. They can’t handle that. And every time their type gets into power, these morons are the first to get the axe. But then it’s too late.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 09:43 PM
1

Because you have no idea what you’re talking about. A man was murdered over nothing.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 09:41 PM
1

What was something racist he said?
/r/MensRights03/10/25 09:41 PM
1

Great. I’m asking what he did that was so bad that being murdered was something he “reaped and sowed”. Not rhetorical- I’m not a fan or anything. Sidenote- imagine thinking college was some kind of big accomplishment to be judged, rather than a tool. I suspect this guy achieved more than you or I ever will.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 03:02 PM
2

Oh stfu. What exactly did Charlie Kirk do that warranted his murder? He sowed open and friendly debate, and the Left can’t handle that.
/r/MensRights02/10/25 12:50 AM
27

Years of women getting men to do all the heavy labor, and systemically take on all the risks.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/09/25 11:06 PM
1

A lot of projection here. While I started off a little combative, I did try to have a real conversation.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 10:00 PM
5

Feminism is not about equality, and doesn’t include men. Can you name anything feminists have done for men? That is a lie, or you have been fooled. Self-Judgement is NOT Self-Reflection. I said self reflection LEADS TO self judgement. Not the same. Women are doing and saying toxic things, and vulnerable young men are reflecting on why they aren’t “good enough”. This is lost on feminists because they despise men. And non-feminist women in general objectify men. Neither group really see men as peo…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 09:34 PM
7

I think there’s a purity to your statement that existed online maybe 12 to 15 years ago. Ever since the murderer named Elliot Rodger, there have been numerous articles and even TV shows about incels. There probably are some incels like that still out there somewhere. Uninfluenced by the modern world, like remote desert tribes. But again, that’s not what this post was about. It is negative self reflection that leads to self judgement. And toxic feminine behavior is a real component in that. We ta…
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:55 PM
11

Your “counterpoints” are glib and dumb little nothings. If there is one thing that actual incels do, it’s self reflect. They obsess over self reflection and self judgement. YES, they are trapped in toxic ideas and their perceptions are warped. But self reflection is not the issue. The toxic behavior of many women is certainly an issue…. …but that’s neither here nor there. The post is about how “incel” has become a catch-all for anyone that threatens feminist narratives. Or even unrelated things …
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:27 PM
9

Oh so it’s a mythical being. Cool
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:15 PM
-1

Better yet, stop calling people losers.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 08:17 AM
1

It’s funny watching all this mid 2000s stuff just come right back. It’s like the same garbage generation just reincarnates every 20 years.
/r/MensRights12/09/25 06:07 AM
1

Right. I am making the case that it’s not believable. Women have no credible history when it comes to behavior on dating apps. If they were selecting for someone to date, they wouldn’t be getting lied to.
/r/MensRights10/09/25 01:06 AM
1

That’s very true- for dating. My secondary comment is that I don’t believe women are selecting for someone to date. They’re selecting for hot sex. Philosophies like politics aren’t very useful for that, as this article shows. Their fellow sex searchers will just blow it off or lie. But why do I think that- am I just mean? No, we have a history of toxic behavior. We have a history of super selective standards at absurd levels. Standards based solely on things that are sexually attractive. Toxic b…
/r/MensRights10/09/25 12:40 AM
1

So both sides involve having standards, but one side is hyper selective to the point of absurdity. To the extent that people have talked about it for years now. There are liars and hypocrites on both sides… but the side with notoriously absurd criteria seems to be the one having a problem. So much that they wrote an article about it. Seems like either their criteria is selecting for attractiveness over honesty, or they just have too many deal breakers in general.
/r/MensRights09/09/25 03:24 PM
1

Why wouldn't you be honest about what you're looking for? Because in that bit of rhetorical charity, I am a woman not facing up to my real intentions. As you say: Standards may change based on one's intentions in dating/hookup/etc. I may have strict guidelines about, say, being vegan. But somehow I’m only ever swiping on tall, hot guys. My standards reflect what I’m really after, even if my honesty level doesn’t. In this example, it’s not veganism. As per the original statement, I don’t feel sym…
/r/MensRights09/09/25 05:16 AM
5

The "no conservatives" women are the subject here. Men infamously do not have criteria anything like the stuff I mentioned. At this point it is a trope- the fraction of matches men get compared to women. YouTube, X, and Tok all have tons of content about it. You can have preferences (though women get very angry when guys do) and you can make politics your business. But if i’m just looking for a hot people to hook up with, I doubt they’re going to care much about some arbitrary rule I made up. Th…
/r/MensRights08/09/25 03:16 PM
34

woman will say in her profile "no conservatives" Whoooo cares. Women have gotten so ridiculous with dating- with height, and income, and the ick, and rating every average man as unattractive, and everything else on dating apps. It’s hard to feel any sympathy that the men they always seem to choose might ignore their latest set of rules. For one, if it’s a hook-up politics aren’t anyone’s business.
/r/MensRights08/09/25 10:08 AM
1

Who cares
/r/MensRights08/09/25 09:59 AM
35

Feminism is a supremacy movement. They’re trying to create a new upper class- women they deem acceptable. Likewise a new underclass of neutralized pawns- men in general.
/r/MensRights06/09/25 08:45 AM
1

Objectification is a pretty shaky concept and they treat it like gospel. I don’t need to humanize the waiter or the “pizza guy” or a professor to see them as human beings. That would be a flaw with me, not society. There’s nothing wrong with appreciating sexualized roles.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:42 PM
1

So women need men to protect them because they’re afraid other men will kill them. Got it. I guess beauty standards and laughing at fat chicks are both ok then? Apparently it’s no big deal.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/25 04:46 PM
2

No we have all the other issues with feminists too, it’s just funny that they’re so hideously ugly.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/09/25 12:59 AM
2

As long as you view garden variety players as the “top”, you’re already lost. Don’t base men’s (or people’s) worth on how much money they can earn or how many women reward them with sex. Sex and money are fun things. But they are trivial things.
/r/MensRights03/09/25 09:26 AM
11

In every other generation, feminists are the vast minority. This is a movement that could literally mean anything- all you have to do is claim it. (And, realistically, be female unless you wanna be constantly suspect.). And women are like nah, no thanks. With Gen Z, they’ve managed to hit a whopping 53%. And that’s after decades of movies and books, and literal propaganda in schools systems. Barely over half of the new generation has been convinced to claim the name. But this toxic gender war th…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 01:01 AM
12

Your opinion has been noted. Here’s what will logically happen: selfish women will revel in this little bit of petty power. They’ll proudly boast about how “less women are interested in dating than men” and other circumstantial nonsense. They’ll shrug off the mean spirited and anti-humane behavior and generally be quite smug. These women are a minority in the grand total of women, as feminists always are. As all feminists, they’re also incredibly privileged. They’ve grown up with the equality an…
/r/MensRights01/09/25 12:26 AM
1

Not a trend. Don’t rate humans on number scales.
/r/MensRights31/08/25 09:34 PM
18

I think the “epidemic” part is construct that society can pretend to revere whenever it needs hero points, or the media wants a sympathy piece… and then let feminists beat it like a piñata and jeer the rest of the time. And by its own nature, it’s made of blame-menism. “Why can’t men make friends? Teach men not to be distant.” Imagine how it would be framed for women. It wouldn’t be loneliness it would be society isolating them. Which is really what’s happening for men. Every male bonding space …
/r/MensRights31/08/25 03:59 AM
9

reputational precarity These same feminists will go on and on about the tragedy of female beauty standards, and how that’s so hard for women to deal with, and claim words are violence. But rallying thousands of people to shame and mock you specifically, and make fun of your particular body? And possibly put you in the path of violence from some anonymous psycho? Nahh… you’ve just internalized a narrative of female persecution.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 12:02 PM
1

You don’t speak for women
/r/MensRights13/08/25 04:47 AM
11

You’ll know if someone shows up at your door and says you’re the father.
/r/MensRights12/08/25 08:56 AM
2

Don’t need a cultural system to tell me that women are the weak sex. Women literally say this every day, whenever it benefits them.
/r/MensRights10/08/25 03:47 AM
76

They think history is a millennia old conspiracy of men controlling them (and the banks).
/r/MensRights10/08/25 02:36 AM
6

It’s not really comparable. I use the term “acceptable women”. Women have an observable culture of in-grouping. They see themselves as a collective. Any women who don’t do this, or who step out of line at all, tbh, are erased. They simply don’t exist. Before men invented every single thing that makes modern life possible and safe, this in-group was based on securing a man for marriage. Being a “lady” was the ideal. Now it’s based on career, education, and sexuality. With feminism it gets applied…
/r/MensRights01/08/25 05:17 AM
8

No it’s not. The “fem” in feminism refers to an idea that women are uniquely oppressed and thus need special treatment.
/r/MensRights31/07/25 07:43 AM
25

I really don’t see many women exhibiting basic decency. Not at the gym, not in restaurants, not at the grocery store, not in the dating world, not in how they talk about men or other women they don’t like… Maybe if our society starts calling out female violence, women will seem more chill too.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/25 07:11 AM
1

Women are not systematically oppressed.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 02:17 AM
2

Gotta give the standard Reddit answer: Leave. For sure. Ultimatums in general are not healthy- they’re the hallmark of immaturity or narcissism. It’s a control game. But then when you add bigotry to it… things are only going to get worse.
/r/MensRights03/07/25 06:46 AM
1

Shut up stupid
/r/MensRights02/07/25 09:25 PM
8

Men talk about and do things for “people”. It’s only women who pretend there is some specific group called “men”.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 10:04 AM
103

male gaze At this point they’re just spouting the stupidest dogmas and it’s totally normalized. No, some woman’s latest 50 Shades fantasy is not the “male gaze”. Women like that stuff; deal with it. They’re single-handedly destroying sexual liberation.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 09:01 AM
13

LOL. Women push men to do those things, reward men who do those things, and severely punish men who don’t. You should consider that most women are not feminists. And honestly women who are feminists are the same, whenever push comes to shove in even minor ways.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 12:26 AM
1

Well what was he wearing. Hahaha. It’s so stupid: Apparently this guy was sexually appealing to her, and as a missionary he came into her house which was a dangerous place. So yeah… if you appear sexually enticing in a dangerous place, you could get raped. Or worse. But if stupidly risky behavior is your own fault (ladies), freak accidents are nobody’s fault. Who would’ve guessed.
/r/MensRights08/06/25 06:05 PM
9

People can give their own money to whoever they want. But when there are cultural institutions that favor one class or group, it’s dangerous.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 05:03 AM
6

As someone already answered you- Sex specific specific scholarships are deemed a title IX violation If there was a working and legal scholarship fund that didn’t get shut down, people would donate to it.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 04:35 AM
28

Why don't mens rights activists start mens only scholarships.. Because they’re not multimillionaires and nobody would donate to it. If it’s even legal. People don’t care about men. A men’s only publishing house recently came out— that industry is wildly unbalanced to women. How do you think people reacted? Men’s only scholarships would quickly go the way of the Boy Scouts. Also, lots of people would like to see any gender specific scholarships go away if they had a choice.
/r/MensRights06/06/25 04:26 AM
1

First of all, men do condemn it. In the USA -proud producer of Reddit- men will frequently kill or maim a rapist without trial, especially if the woman is young. It’s the explosion of mob violence (and all the possible revenge acts later) that men are trying to prevent when they don’t instantly believe every woman who cries rape. Traditionally women have never had to deal with mediation and preventing violence, so they have no idea. And secondly, women lie about it. A lot. The effect of false ac…
/r/MensRights04/06/25 03:05 PM
1

No: As a man, I have nothing to do with a rapist who also happens to be a man. Should you feel resposibility for every act by people who share your eye color? Men don’t report rape from women and many countries don’t even count things women do as rape. Also, women lie about it.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 02:39 PM
1

I’m not? I’m in favor of it. Every single day. That would be the “take responsibility for themselves like men do” I mentioned. I am against women pretending those precautions are against men. They’re not; they’re against bad actors. Take a stroll through the ghetto. Though precautions will now just as likely be against black women. Any demographic can be violent. Stop grouping normal men with attackers.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 05:35 AM
1

Uh huh. It’s pretty easy to look up gender breakdowns for street violence… or you could just ask your (presumably) feminist female friends. I think that if you suspect men are equally worried about packs of violent women… you are not in touch with the “real world”. Women can be physically violent. My own vibes based opinion is that women get more violent whenever they take on the social roles that women generally put on men. But whatevs. With physical violence, men are generally being prepared f…
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:33 AM
2

Are those strangers typically male?
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:13 AM
5

LOL. My points easily stand. I mean… you can go read Wikipedia about peer groups. Do men ever take precautions against other men? Of course we do. Every single day.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 04:07 AM
5

Whenever women take responsibility for themselves like men do, they learn self defense and they’re more concerned with your threat level than your gender. But you’re struggling for a gotcha with semantics because you can’t dispute what I’ve said. Why would I care that you’re cool with women’s bigotry towards you? We are not natural peers; we’re male. Of course you favor women’s opinion over men’s- guys usually do. Talking as men on this sub is an exception to that general rule.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:59 AM
3

They are but they don’t need to be. It’s logic.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:48 AM
10

Women (acceptable women) are a peer group. That’s why they speak for each other, why we hear about women’s issues, etc. So it’s applicable to criticize and put your guard up against “women”. Men are not a peer group. We frequently have little in common with each other, and usually don’t see each other as peers. It often takes a lot to get men to bond. Women talk about “men” because we’re an other to them. Not because we’re a group.If men were a group, they would judge us by the group. As in… we …
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:44 AM
1

It’s a hate-cult that is completely wrecking their minds.
/r/MensRights27/05/25 03:03 AM
1

Telling women not to go for selfish pricks and psychopaths just because they’re hot in no way compares to you chicks celebrating this evil murderer.
/r/MensRights24/05/25 02:46 AM
-7

You do know! Literally on every continent they’re found, in every century, impoverished straight white men have been oppressed.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 01:42 AM
1

You’re valued on what you can provide for women- with or without capitalism.
/r/MensRights16/05/25 05:40 AM
55

Women are focused on “climate change” because they don’t want to fix real problems like suburban sprawl, habitat loss, pollution, and plastics. Show me all the women leaders protecting Earth from those things. We’ve got a famous young woman who flew around in jets and private yachts scowling and scolding everyone, while a not-famous young man the same age invented a brand new way to clean garbage out of the oceans.
/r/MensRights10/05/25 10:39 PM
6

She’ll be surprised to learn that men also have a host of all kinds of health issues to worry about.
/r/MensRights30/04/25 02:28 AM
1

A lot of the “radicalizing” is just the level of stuff women say about men every day, too. Society’s always quick to point out that’s the fringe and not normal feminism and not usual women’s attitudes… but any valid complaint the other direction gets labeled “misogyny” and lumped with Tate or incels.
/r/MensRights26/04/25 04:45 AM
6

I don’t think that will work. Hot take: Women will destroy all the gains and benefits made by the sexual revolution with their selfishness. (Current day.) This will destabilize society; things will get bad in one way or another to some extent. Women will damsel and plea for regular joes to save them. Women will then turn into cartoon Trads on a Victorian level. Women will then blame men for the oppressiveness of their cartoon Trad culture. Guys will find Regular Joe-ism doesn’t bring reward like…
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:53 AM
1

But also because men do stuff. Inventions, art, careers, etc. Some men are fine leaving a trail of neglected kids without guilt. But a lot of guys would rather not.
/r/MensRights23/04/25 08:06 AM
1

Ridiculous. What documented reality are you speaking of? For one, “systemic” means part of a system, as in laws and policies. If you can point to any laws or policies that promote inequality, I’d be interested to hear them. (Even so, those would be exceptions not the rule.) You feminists claim inequality happens at levels across our society… and misuse “systemic” to describe that. But it’s nothing proven or documented at all. It’s just anecdotes based on how you feel. Usually they’re silly af. T…
/r/MensRights18/04/25 11:54 PM
11

LOL you believe in “systemic inequality” and you’re calling people fragile. Also, men speaking up about abusive rhetoric (which currently is systemic) ≠ a “narrative”.
/r/MensRights18/04/25 12:39 AM
1

Women’s behavior now is really awful… and the mainstream will not call it out. I find it good to step back and remind myself that any group of people can be terrible- every human can get pulled into toxic behavior, we’re all the villain at some points in life, blah blah blah. But this current culture for women is unbelievably bad and it’s infuriating. I’ve become committed to pointing it out. But it’s hard because they’ll absolutely use any method to ruin you if you do.
/r/MensRights15/04/25 11:36 PM
1

He said “R/ABUSIVERELATIONSHIPS BANNED ME”. The topic is auto-bans for posting here
/r/MensRights08/04/25 07:45 PM
1

No you don’t want true equality, yes we can blame you, and we couldn’t care less that you’re tired and perpetually angry.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 06:10 AM
1

Because it’s true.
/r/MensRights08/04/25 04:02 AM
9

We all have a lizard brain but we are human beings capable of thought. Pseudoscience gets used a lot to excuse bad behavior or for explaining culture. That’s how we got the furry-tier internet philosophy about alpha and beta males. Women will definitely use pseudoscience to for their benefit too.
/r/MensRights05/04/25 09:11 AM
23

Nobody has been alive for centuries. Feminists fostered this style of thinking very well in recent times. To the point where it’s easy to forget it’s ludicrous. Like we’re all members of ancient sects, developing instincts over thousands of years. My parents were kids before air conditioning, let alone smartphones. A woman alive right now has almost nothing in common with women two centuries ago. In the here and now, I am physically weaker than people I deal with every day. And unlike for women,…
/r/MensRights05/04/25 07:40 AM
9

Lmao they absolutely do. I think you need to listen to more women. Women tear down women they deem objectionable, all the time. Also, It’s perfectly natural to “objectify” each other. It’s human interaction. There’s nothing wrong with “objectifying” someone as a sharp dresser, or the pizza guy. Likewise for being hot. You don’t have to constantly perform some recognition-dance about people’s inner selves to respect them as human beings. (Unless you’re a sociopathic feminist.).
/r/MensRights04/04/25 04:46 PM
28

Now, I don't condone either of their behavior, I don't think we should sexualize anyone. This is worth reevaluating- it’s just feminist propaganda. Sex is healthy and normal, and we all sexualize ourselves. Feminists will celebrate one woman as a “goddess” for sexualizing herself, scorn another as a “pick me”, rage at men for objectifying women, and then objectify some hot man in the span of two minutes. It’s just about whatever serves them at the moment.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 07:47 AM
1

Maybe. But I am not from the social class that goes from suburbs to private college to pitching shows at Netflix about how oppressed I am. So probably not.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 06:05 PM
10

clear parallels to the real world. Really, I haven’t seen it. Is it about all these adult women who “seduce” adolescent boys then? Or about the insane violence and toxic behavior adolescent girls routinely get away with? It would be great if Netflix called that out.
/r/MensRights01/04/25 01:31 AM
5

Hollywood is “targeted” at whoever will pay. Women choose to capitalize on their nudity, because as I’ve shown it’s a natural desire to showcase nudity anyway. You can call that dynamic “incentivized” if you want, but it only describes half the equation. People use this language to turn women into damsels who need to be saved.
/r/MensRights17/03/25 05:18 PM
7

Reddit is full of women showcasing their nudity for free on various subs. Because women like sex. But just as soon as the option came out, those subs filled up with other women trying to sell their nudity. They’re not “subject” to a standard; it’s just how humanity works. Additionally, look at how women talk about bald men. And what became a huge market as soon as the science was there? Hair regrowth. Men are subject to women’s standards all day every day. Nobody cares. Women are the big spender…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 05:04 PM
41

No. The point of that song was to satirize a different double standard. Women will go on and on about the “male gaze”… when it suits them to complain. But they use that sexuality to get ahead when it suits them, and always have. To the point of making millions in Hollywood. Self-righteous feminism was really starting to take off in 2013, and McFarlane used boyish immaturity to make fun of its hypocrisy. Arguably people should just be enlightened and realize everyone craves sex. But feminists are…
/r/MensRights17/03/25 12:32 PM
1

I’ve come to realize it’s just the same garbage generation that reincarnates every 25 years. Just about 7 years ago this attitude wasn’t in vogue at all. Nor was rating women some number out of 10. But twenty years ago, both were totally the norm.
/r/MensRights16/03/25 12:46 PM
1

It’s crazy! Women are known for getting men to fight for them. Then, they also use the government to enact violence for themselves. (From Salem witch trials to modern day police and courts.) But then you can also watch videos of them literally fighting all day too, on top of that! Like how awful can you be? Lol!
/r/MensRights14/03/25 05:36 AM
1

Yeah no one ever fought for a queen before.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 04:58 AM
2

Men are not a peer group. It takes a lot to get men to feel any connection to each other. We’re not a collective. Understanding that really ends any feminist narrative before they even start their rant. Women support women… who are acceptable. Every other woman gets banished and erased, or horrendously abused until they flee the public eye.
/r/MensRights14/03/25 02:28 AM
16

Where are the feminists for all this? Why aren’t they demanding equality from these governments?
/r/MensRights08/03/25 12:34 AM
10

It’s one more thing that made me realize all this gender “equality” is just double standards and abusing men. Women have become beyond any criticism, but they say unbelievably hateful stuff towards men every day. It makes me really mad, as someone who has always spoken up for women who don’t match typical beauty norms.
/r/MensRights28/02/25 06:48 AM
1

Modern dating and hooking up was a great thing, imho. About 50 years- decent run for a utopian social experiment. But let’s face it. Women killed it.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 11:30 PM
8

Ugh, the worst! Someone should do a sequel comic where this character’s friend disputes her comment and then identifies as a man.
/r/MensRights10/02/25 01:21 PM
4

Support legislation that benefits the demographic. No. Somehow white men seem to be the only demographic left that doesn’t share this opinion. As a white man, I’d like to get back to judging people on the content of their character.
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:44 PM
105

This comic where she’s giving her unsolicited opinions…
/r/MensRights09/02/25 09:40 PM
9

It’s like every job I’ve ever had. Women can say all kinds of heinous stuff that’s like… who knows what might happen to a man for saying it. And they have no idea.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 05:19 AM
1

That’s what they do…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/01/25 07:27 PM
47

They live in a romantasy simulation world where women are an oppressed people, forever ridiculed and judged, and constantly unsafe… while men don’t have any problems. So anything that causes men grief is worthy of sarcasm, and they love that sarcasm.
/r/MensRights13/01/25 09:58 PM
10

Something I’m starting to realize… these articles come out every couple years. I’ve seen different polls were like 1/3 of women identified as feminists. There’s a US poll from 2020 where 61% of women identified as feminists. That’s in the peak of the “woke”, radfem era. That’s after years of conditioning through media and education. 61%. And also, this for an ideology that could literally mean anything! It sells itself as simply meaning “equality”. It has dozens of variations. It has a personal …
/r/MensRights05/01/25 08:46 PM
1

Women’s rights isn’t feminism.
/r/MensRights31/12/24 12:11 AM
13

Feminism is built on gaslighting. It is a toxic hate cult and your mom is brainwashed by it. To be honest- that’s a willing condition for many women. I mean, it’s a belief system that says all of their problems spring from being oppressed. It’s very inviting.
/r/MensRights29/12/24 01:47 AM
18

Our heroine was Margaret Thatcher. Ohhhh. She’s an 80s yuppie. I think there’s a lot of cultural issues at play here that are not just feminism. She was told over and over why dog-eat-dog selfishness was not a good approach to life and society, and she chose to follow the Me Generation instead. Still… first they blamed men, now they blame feminism. That tracks.
/r/MensRights26/12/24 03:32 AM
7

But why would women owe you sex? They don’t? That’s the point I am making. “Nobody feels they are ‘owed’ sex.”
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:26 PM
8

I am not angry?
/r/MensRights15/12/24 05:04 PM
27

You can want sex. Yay, you’re so close. And why would I want sex? Because everybody wants sex. Nobody feels they are “owed” sex. It is just natural to want it. It is a normal part of coupling. If we are having a conversation and you ask me a question and I just completely ignore you… you weren’t “owed” anything different. But it is abnormal for me to do that. Romance is a conversation and sex is the answer everyone (not just men) wants to eventually find out. It’s pretty irrelevant to objectific…
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:42 PM
20

So… Can you be angry if I feel that women owe me sex? Wanting sex is my choice.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:15 PM
48

Then nobody owes you nothing. Including sex or a relationship. Feminists always frame normal human interaction as someone “being owed”. That says it all.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 03:04 PM
2

Yes. Also there are regions in our society where it’s culturally known to be worse, and South Florida is one of those regions.
/r/MensRights15/12/24 04:31 AM
16

They always wanna know “what happened”.
/r/MensRights07/12/24 12:15 AM
3

Yeah, picture the handsome young male model by a boat or in a field, while they use kid gloves to explain Sweden’s new NEETs. Why do I suspect that BBC article written by a white woman would have lots of discussion on “white privilege” too.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 02:24 PM
1

One in three that would even come forward. As someone who grew up with a physically and mentally abusive stepmother, I never mentioned it to anyone.
/r/MensRights06/12/24 05:25 AM
1

Some men love to watch this for sexual/revenge reasons. Seriously doubt it, but who knows. Men struggle because we did everything we could to invite women into equality: gift after gift, nonstop help…. And frankly it’s been a disaster. Women are now a 100 times more toxic than postwar men ever were.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 11:24 PM
1

I think that you live in a false reality. I would look at some polls on happiness. Maybe also watch some anecdotal YouTubes and TikToks, where aging single women actually tell you how they feel about choosing career over community and family. Also look up some stats for dating and sexual experience levels now. Kids are struggling for those things, but their home lives and families have not improved since radical feminism went mainstream.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 10:40 PM
30

What else have they been doing for the past 15 years? And look how much happier they are! Look how fantastic the dating world has become! Look how great family life is now. I routinely hear it said that this is the smartest and most well-adjusted generation of kids ever; teachers say they’re a delight to teach. And single, aging women are just loving their careers. Way to go, ladies.
/r/MensRights03/12/24 06:34 AM
1

Correct: there is no guarantee to be safe.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:41 PM
1

Where do you see this women fighting women in real life? Personally: white girls outside of bars, black girls in rough parts of towns. And what’s the ratio compared to men fighting men? Already covered that. Women are crime bosses. Women usually encounter violence and sexual assault from men Women don’t “usually” encounter this. It’s a bad thing that could happen. It’s right to be scared of it, just as it’s right to be scare of any violence. Learn self defense. Most women take a lot of security …
/r/MensRights02/12/24 05:12 PM
2

I don’t use TikTok. It’s a rational assumption that, even in just the US, two women are having a physical altercation somewhere. Videos show it. But as I mentioned, women use social pressure to get their violence done. They are “crime bosses”. That observation is a cultural universal. As such: Neither men nor women are worried about being attacked by women. Right, we’re all usually more worried about psychotic behavior or social manipulation. But if a woman looks tough and hostile, men and women…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 04:55 PM
2

And women basically never fight each other. Women fight each other all the time. Look at the videos on Reddit. And that’s even in addition to the fact that women use social pressure more than physical violence. But most men rarely get into fights as adults? Every single day, men: Stay away from certain parts of town. Don’t flash money around. Avoid making insults or inflammatory behavior. Avoid physical provocations (slaps, light pushes, pouring a drink on someone, etc). Bear insults and provoca…
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:46 PM
3

No, it’s this: Men have to fight men who are much bigger and are very apart in a fight. Literally happens every day. If women are equal, they should have to do this too. Learning self defense will help.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 03:12 PM
3

Yes, I do think that.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:44 PM
1

As much as it would help me fighting someone twice my size, as a man.
/r/MensRights02/12/24 02:42 PM
11

Except that they didn’t.
/r/MensRights23/11/24 07:12 AM
1

54% of men voted Trump and 54% of women voted Harris. I’ve never seen “barely over half” get spun as some kind of mandate the way they do with Trump. It’s just another Be Mad At Men narrative. Wouldn’t it be funny if all these angry women posts weren’t by real American women at all?
/r/MensRights14/11/24 01:14 PM
1

Barely over half of men didn’t vote the way they wanted. Barely over half of women voted how they were supposed to. (Unless searching for 1 second was wrong.) it really seems like more narrative spinning. Wouldn’t it be crazy if all these mad women posters, with the usual tens of thousands of upvotes, weren’t real American women at all.
/r/MensRights14/11/24 10:23 AM
11

Anecdotal: Women actively shame guys who are not coercive. All day every day. They call them nerds, and betas, use gay as an insult, complain that they are “creepy”, and of course the “incel” label for any guy who complains about it. They’ve pretty much turned “marriage material” into an insult. It’s a synonym for dupe. At the best, they call good guys “Labrador Retriever” types. Conversely, they reward “bad boys” with attention and sex. This has all been said a million times. People have pointe…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 03:29 PM
1

There are countries where 12 is the age of consent. There are US states where that’s the case with marriage. Because people used to die a lot. They had full time jobs as little kids. They left home at 14. Etc. And there are also states where 16 and 17 year olds can consent to adult activities. For the same kind of reasons. Life used to be much harder and potentially shorter for many people. That all grosses me out as much as the next guy, but it’s part of my point that the commenter was wrong in…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 08:55 PM
1

Who are you?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:17 PM
1

You obv cannot dispute anything I said
/r/MensRights09/11/24 07:14 PM
3

Er… yeah? Ask the average person on the street their definition of rape And there we go. I am an average person on the street. These comments reflect my opinion.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 06:07 PM
1

I can’t believe you dumb it down to characteristics you can’t even justify. The law doesn’t even agree with what you’re saying. This woman used sex to drive a person to suicide. And it happens… a lot.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:54 PM
14

You’re moving goalposts. No, I am saying the goalposts already moved. Which I explained in the comment you replied to. It’s an evolving definition. It changed as recently as 2013 in the USA- and our definition is different from the UK (where women supposedly can’t rape men). Even with different States in the US the age of consent varies, let alone with nations. I don’t think there even was an age of consent for much of history. Two things everyone agrees on is that rape is an act of cruel domina…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:32 PM
17

So, with your definition here, sex with a willing 6th grader isn’t rape. Yeah… I don’t want that definition.
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:19 PM
23

Because rape is forced intercourse, right? Like no other thing can factually be rape?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 05:05 PM
43

No it doesn’t sound fair. Society has established that “rape” doesn’t mean the violent act we actually associate it with. We define sex with a willing teenager as rape. Feminists frequently call drunken sex “rape”, though it’s funny how those consent issues never apply to the guy who was drinking. In fact, feminists call all kinds of things rape, and women routinely describe men they don’t like as “kinda rapey”. So no, I don’t see any problem calling this act sexualized destruction of a human be…
/r/MensRights09/11/24 04:43 PM
293

I get lots of downvotes on Reddit for saying false accusal is basically rape. It’s an act of extreme cruelty by someone who doesn’t see you as a human being, doesn’t care, and has no problem whatsoever using sex to destroy people psychologically. How is that different?
/r/MensRights09/11/24 03:34 PM
3

Straight up saying “you don’t have to tell him who you vote for” and the like. It was just disgusting. Perfect combination of playful Y2K “boys r dumb” feminism with current year “men are violent oppressors” hysteria.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 03:17 PM
5

Nothing to see except women acting like domestic violence doesn’t matter if it’s a woman. calling the whole thing a “show trial”. waving off the sexual attack of false accusation (literally caught on video ) …which has driven people to suicide on multiple occasions.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 04:19 PM
1

If you break up, you might consider going public with it first. Potential false accusal from her.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 01:20 AM
3

People who masturbate in this weird Tantric way where they look at porn online for hours without finishing. But “goon” originally comes from online gaming… where being online all day and night puts people in a tranced out “goon state”.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 03:00 PM
5

Nothing ever applies to women and if you call BS on that you’re a misogynist or an incel.
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:34 PM
1

Got an owl in yer pocket? Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 08:12 PM
11

Fascism is when guys listen to a liberal podcaster and refuse to go to feminist therapy sessions.
/r/MensRights20/10/24 08:08 PM
1

“After millennia of…” This BS. You are not part of anything that happened for millennia.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 01:22 PM
1

“Rape” is not a curse word. There is no need to use a line instead of an “a” over and over.
/r/MensRights09/10/24 06:07 AM
1

body. As usual, they can only see what directly affects them.
/r/MensRights08/10/24 02:11 PM
14

Will the UK ever get off this crazy train? (Could I even post that if I was British?)
/r/MensRights25/09/24 12:51 AM
3

Wowwww. Really makes you think. I just don’t know if the world’s ready for this kind of cutting edge commentary. Can women even handle this: https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/09/14/13/86605093-13849917-Aidan_Turner_has_opened_up_about_his_racy_Rivals_role_and_how_it-a-1_1726316748767.jpg
/r/MensRights15/09/24 09:53 PM
5

Yeah, I really think that people will look back on the 2010s as a period of moral hysteria. Just like the “satanic panic” of the 1980s and others. Somehow, around 2012, Radical Feminism and critical theory became the pop cultural zeitgeist. And the fact is… they sort of trap people into non-thinking. Nations are now facing some seriously dangerous issues. And Hollywood can barely make a decent movie. All because of this dumb panic. But it all starts with this feminist fantasy that women have it …
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:54 PM
5

We are talking about being safe in public. We’re not talking about some woman calling my girlfriend too skinny or too fat. Nor are we talking about some guy cat calling her or talking shit. Or a customer being rude at her job, for that matter. Likewise, we are talking about public violence and murder, not rape. Still, The rape statistics are recently higher in European countries because they invited in people who don’t view Western women as human. They shouldn’t have done that. They also shouldn…
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:34 PM
5

Ohhh nooo, a theoretical cat call! Yes, they are safer in public. Look up the numbers. Where is anyone not allowed to carry pepper spray?
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:21 PM
6

Safer in public, socially catered to, always believed in regards to trauma, make more money when you factor out child-bearers, have more scholarships available, don’t face the draft, face radically lower punishment for breaking the law, rarely punished for anything tbh, get better representation in media, regarded as the mental standard in psychology, have a choice when it comes to paying for unexpected children, favored in divorce court. Etc.
/r/MensRights07/09/24 11:13 PM
1

This is a conspiracy theory you believe. 99% of men in history were just trying to survive. You could just as easily say women put all the hard work and danger on men to deal with. When a society or group gets a little settled… and people have some time to think… that’s when romanticized gender roles come out. And as we just saw in Afghanistan, women push men to do the fighting, etc. They will not do the work, if there’s any danger- even to literally liberate themselves. Even with the greatest m…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 04:01 PM
2

Like “gentiles”, men are not a real group. It is incredibly hard to get men to become peers. Even in friendship with a group of guys, it’s still “our group of guys”… not all men. Has anyone ever said “I sure am glad some man invented ibuprofen!” …. “Thank goodness you men invented air conditioning!” No. We humans invented air conditioning. People invented ibuprofen. It would actually sound strange to hear it said as “men”. Men are only a really group when it’s something negative. Conversely , th…
/r/MensRights15/08/24 06:42 AM
2

“Even a 747 looks small to the Grand Canyon”
/r/MensRights09/08/24 10:41 PM
1

What’s funny is how fast Feminists turn conservative about men when it serves them. They’re all just Cartoon Trads.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/24 08:59 AM
19

Deep dive: Look at how women punish women for being “cool girls” and “pick me’s”. The vitriol along those lines is completely mainstream. That’s because it is rare to meet a woman who likes and does cool stuff. I don’t mean trendy “cool kid” stuff, or even “stuff guys like”. I mean anything. A genuine, non-performative interest in something unique, with a passion about it capable of intriguing others. Does that sound like every other gal you meet? Just one of the thousands every day who share yo…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/07/24 02:29 PM
4

Yep, Dazed is right. Straight men haven’t been reading novels for almost 200 years. Funny how there’s a 20 year loop. This is straight-up internet writing circa 2007. It’s like Gawker.
/r/MensRights25/07/24 02:19 AM
1

Highly suspect. For one: This is three generations and the age ranges of those generations are completely arbitrary. (To the extent that “millennials” are even one, coherent thing.) It’s weird that the synopsis refers to three generations but the mission state only mentions two. Why is this study being framed as generational in the first place, instead of simply over time? That’s the crux. It’s literally in the name. I think there’s a deep identity crisis driving this study. Secondly, the whole …
/r/MensRights17/07/24 07:05 PM
1

You have not disputed (or even really interfaced with) a single thing I’ve said. You simply alternate between insulting me and saying I am narrow-minded. You should open your own mind, and see that we are saying mostly the same things.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 12:15 AM
1

My mind is already open, thanks.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 12:07 AM
1

You can keep insulting me but it doesn’t make you right. I am not talking about other countries right now, I am giving you an example of indisputable oppression. “What is happening to minorities in this country” is that there are laws against discrimination. There are $billions spent to help them. Making things fair for all minorities is literally the foundation of our society. You may not like facing that reality, or may not understand it. But I invite you to dispute the statement. Americans ac…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:09 PM
1

And yeah that does mean oppression is occurring Which is why I said “arguably” no one is oppressed at the start. “Oppression” is a subjective term and I personally think you’re throwing it around in a hyperbolic way. But we could say men are “oppressed” compared to women and it’s logically correct. statistics change in favor of white people. By the statistics alone, black people do most of the crime and murder. That’s a fact, just like racist culture in the South. So the cycle will go round and …
/r/MensRights08/07/24 03:47 PM
1

And you ARE ignorant to the oppression of people other than yourself Apparently you are not aware that all men are given higher sentencing for the same crimes as women. That doesn’t make anyone “oppressed”. It means there are complex problems that our society has to solve. That fact that our society wants and tries to solve these problems means it is not inherently oppressive.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 03:21 PM
2

That wasn’t “arguing” it was discussion. I am not “ignorant” at all. I may be incorrect or uninformed, but I readily change my opinions if I’m wrong. The government and private institutions literally spend billions on helping various demographics. Your comments are indicative of someone that lives in a fantasy world.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 03:02 PM
2

LOL- women? No women are not oppressed. Is there an element of women’s not perfect lives that you feel qualifies as oppression? Black people have complex problems in our society, but they are not simply “oppressed”. We spend billions helping that demographic. Our culture is objectively obsessed with helping this one small group. I challenge you to go one hour in our society without hearing something about fixing Black issues. It has been this way my whole life. Gay people (not the lgbtq communit…
/r/MensRights08/07/24 02:55 PM
1

Arguably no one is “oppressed” in the US at all. But regardless, there is no one thing oppressing everybody. There are always various problems in an imperfect world.
/r/MensRights08/07/24 04:37 AM
1

Isn’t it going to be great when she’s had her way with Narnia.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 09:03 PM
13

We don’t live in a patriarchy. Nothing oppresses us all.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 05:15 AM
24

Feminism has a myth that men are a group, and that men as a group want power. Those lies exist so feminism can take power. Societies are made by men with ethics. The system might get abused by individuals who want power, but if it’s a working society and not a horror show, it’s because people (usually men) are trying to make ethical laws. Middle East societies are founded on religious ethics (patriarchy). Western societies are based on Liberal ethics (equality). Both types overcompensate. The We…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 06:57 PM
-1

Consent can be revoked mid act Feminist language is a diabolical thing. “No I don’t want to”… Is a phrase that women and men alike respect. It’s clear. It’s sympathetic. If someone says “no” and a situation doesn’t stop, we immediately know who the villain is. Every human feels an urge to protect or seek justice for someone who said “no”. It cuts through confusion, too. Like if someone is too drunk to say no. That is 100% clear. So why is “consent” always so unclear? Why do women and society nev…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 03:16 PM
21

It isn’t sexual assault if you enjoy it and consent to it. This is the mirror that women need to look in. Unless you believe that consent can be revoked.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:07 AM
38

This whole Reddit brained “drunk people can’t consent” idea needs to go away. Yes they can. Nobody’s off the hook for drunk driving or any other crime just because they got drunk. People have been enjoying drunken sex for thousands of years.
/r/MensRights26/06/24 02:24 PM
10

Pushing that she’s a “mum” and a “young mother”.
/r/MensRights25/06/24 08:13 PM
13

Yes, because under a communist matriarchy everyone would’ve died long ago.
/r/MensRights15/06/24 05:33 AM
10

LOL: Everybody knows who has the rape fantasies and it ain’t men. This bear BS is just another excuse to indulge their obsession. Maybe it’ll feature in the next 50 Shades movie. Meanwhile, men are so disgusted by rape that men have executed other men just on accusations.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:00 AM
1

To be clear: You are asking why it wouldn’t end well for academia to replace civilization’s greatest thinkers over millennia with a couple boomers who teach 20th Century feminism and gender “theory”? Geez, I dunno. Narayan's specialty lies in “decolonizing” feminism. Her academic thesis asked when we may legally regulate “offensive conduct”. Dr. Nzegwu’s areas of expertise include African aesthetics and digital publishing. How could it end any way but great.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 08:59 PM
1

“But I am into the real issues I and others face as men.” So… no.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 05:49 PM
7

I’d say Men’s Rights is about real issues. I don’t care about masculinity at all myself- that’s a label other people put on things. But I am into the real issues I and others face as men. There is nothing real about Men’s Lib. It’s Feminism.
/r/MensRights13/06/24 02:30 AM
5

It’s such a stupid game of semantics. It’s like saying “first world problems” to someone in a car accident. It seems hard for feminists to comprehend, but humans interact. People go on dates. If you’re talking about that playing field, you understand you’re not “owed” anything. Nobody “owes” you basic human decency, but it’s a better way to treat people. I guess they’re obsessed with not smiling too though.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 06:29 PM
56

But this is a trendy thing with women lately, not just his female friends.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 07:45 PM
1

This is the world now; I think it’s worse than male chauvinism ever got.
/r/MensRights03/06/24 04:24 PM
31

Start with this: Stop defining men as “top” and some number. We’re not here on Earth to compete for society’s favor. Which really means women’s favor. Don’t dance on command. Pursue what you like and stop placing men on rungs based on how women would judge them.
/r/MensRights01/06/24 09:59 AM
2

Yes- I am agreeing with that. A false cohort of wildly different people has been fabricated to drive a wedge against a perceived majority. These characters are rewritten only to include this new cohort. Hence the term “diversity”, which no longer means diverse. It means different from traits assigned to a majority. Except people who happen to fall into this supposed majority have shown for decades that they appreciate difference from it. And often don’t even see it. A majority is not a simple pe…
/r/MensRights29/05/24 01:57 PM
-8

female, black, asian, transgender protagonists aren't the problem. Grouping these people together as if they have anything in common is the problem.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 01:07 PM
1

Get rid of the guns. Convince all the men they're inherently bad. Make policy accordingly. And what exactly happened with those Covid concentration camps... did that actually happen?
/r/MensRights29/05/24 12:31 AM
11

Because women (apparently) like to form a clique that they define as “women”. They push out and erase any woman who doesn’t fit. In the past that was “whores” and “hussies”. Today it’s more often like Trump voters or pro life religious women. They either can’t or refuse to understand that men are not the same. It’s funny: When it’s something good, men turn into someone. “Sure am glad someone invented air conditioning!” When it’s something bad, men suddenly exist again. I think it’s fair to say a…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 06:09 AM
1

Any good thing men invented or did was done by “people”. When something is the fault of, or can be blamed on, men then “men” exist. Otherwise, every problem comes from “society”. This is how women talk.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:48 AM
3

even on wikipedia of all places There is a whole cabal of radical feminists who edit Wikipedia. There’s even been mainstream media puff pieces about them. gladly says misandry isnt systemic. Yeah “systemic” is just a magic word from their mythos. It literally means nothing; laws would be the system. Its power will never be bestowed onto heresy.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 05:09 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights21/05/24 10:17 PM
9

Doesn’t make a difference except in terms of potential pain or physical violence. But I could (and possibly would) kill my rapist and society would be ok with it. Society will believe my false accuser no matter what.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 07:29 AM
11

Nah it’s a form of rape. Motivation and outcome are exactly the same as rape. Uses sex to break someone down, just like physical rape. Stop being an apologist.
/r/MensRights13/05/24 01:26 AM
1

you don't get to gaslight me, your comment is right the fuck there. Omg, wtf. This comment? “But now it could mean a 21 year old consensually with a fake ID toting high schooler at a college party.” I have absolutely seen people talking on Reddit and elsewhere about the danger in fake ID situations. Or situations where a teenager was charged with statutory rape while they were underage themselves! This has nothing to do with teachers who can’t keep their hands off of kids.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 11:52 PM
0

STFU, you psycho. Funny that you’re falsely accusing someone of “pedo bullshit” on a thread about false accusal. I didn’t know about exceptions for fake IDs/Romeo & Juliet clauses. I presented a hypothetical that absolutely could happen in the court of public opinion. And a 2-3 year age gap with a minor is exactly what I was talking about. But now it could mean a 21 year old consensually with a fake ID toting high schooler at a college party.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 11:31 PM
12

Physical assault got left behind long ago. Society commonly uses “rape” for underage sex, and some even try to use it for drunken sex. I don’t agree with those characterizations. The idea that drunken sex, which people have enjoyed for millennia, is “non consent” is just stupid. And I think it’s dangerous for the media to use the power-word “rape” in many situations - like where a teenager lies about their age. An angry mob is always ready to hurt someone over that. It’s instantly enraging. But …
/r/MensRights12/05/24 10:33 PM
30

Using sex to destroy someone psychologically and ruin their life in society.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 10:06 PM
62

Yeah, 100%. It’s like having a crazy customer at a job. Let your managers know immediately so it’s not a surprise if they make a claim against you. The parents should know she’s saying this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:49 PM
47

False accusation of rape is rape. Women need to be taught not to do it.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:46 PM
34

Is there any documentation… They didn’t make any claim of “feminists fighting Hollywood so there could be more female nudity”. He said they lost their minds. And that is the general vibe… when it comes to bra burning in the 70s, or topless marches happening regularly for decades, or “free the nipple” in 2012.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 03:04 AM
1

when a daughter was pawned off on amother family Yeah that's not how that was.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:16 AM
1

I wonder if as many black women owned black slaves as black men did.
/r/MensRights10/05/24 07:14 AM
7

Nah.
/r/MensRights01/05/24 06:25 PM
2

LOL. Maybe that's just the type of woman you attract and allow in? That was the tell
/r/MensRights24/04/24 01:13 PM
0

Such a dead-on perfect examination of that piece of crap movie! Bravo, man. Aside from the gender issues (which largely got worse after that decade), it really shows the stupid conformity of that decade. Five sexual experiences in five years is not really that bad? Before they were using virginity to make people feel bad, now they’re saying normal numbers aren’t good enough. I think society will just always try to make men feel inadequate.
/r/MensRights18/04/24 01:49 PM
15

Woke does not mean “aware of injustices” any more than feminism means “equality”. Both these outlooks interpret society through a philosophical framework. Whatever lip service they pay “injustice” only serves that philosophy. Woke is an overused term, but it’s useful.
/r/MensRights17/04/24 01:18 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:59 PM
4

Already covered that. Funny how men are never a peer group when it comes to... "Men killing men" would show anyone with a brain that men are not a peer group to judge as one entity. If one was going to consider men this way, because they're a total moron or whatever, then mens' actions far offset the actions of a bad minority.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:46 PM
4

Realized you probably wouldn't.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:46 PM
6

No, things just look like that to you because of your low cognitive abilities. :-(
/r/MensRights14/04/24 11:34 PM
12

No, pointing out feminist dishonesty is not ”incel shit”, you feminist. Shaming people for their virginity- how compassionate. Funny how men are never a peer group when it comes to inventing everything and saving people and general good works. Only when you want to complain… suddenly it’s men this and men that.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 07:24 PM
1

Random persons doing random things.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:05 PM
22

https://archive.ph/RClg7 Archive link. Don’t give clicks to salon
/r/MensRights12/04/24 09:04 PM
3

It’s appalling, but also there is no such thing as “hate speech”. Governments (and corporations) want to make a noun out of the adjective because it gives them more social control. And it’s always feminists who most want to do that, coincidentally.
/r/MensRights09/04/24 09:37 AM
2

There is not that much of a difference between the sexes. Sometimes more than others. People are different. It’s more about people wanting to codify it and force everyone to behave. Feminists are just another group who does that. Men are villianized specifically because women tend to do that.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 04:15 PM
10

simply dumbfounded by the rage that a movie called BARBIE has created for all of you. LOL - the dumbfounding “rage” of daring to criticize or even critique a movie.
/r/MensRights05/04/24 03:08 AM
4

What percentage of women save strangers in dangerous, physical situations? What percentage of ever single thing in our lives was invented by a woman? Conversely, what is even expected of women by society? It could be related to that.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 04:06 AM
6

Not rhetorical: I wonder what drafting all the women would do for US/Europe public opinion on this war.
/r/MensRights03/04/24 02:32 PM
1

jeopardizes women’s safety. Groan. They will never stop being damsels.
/r/MensRights31/03/24 01:02 AM
1

Women have become worse than men ever were.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 06:13 AM
1

I was talking about thinking X and Boomers are “tomato tomato”. Outside of Walmart and 7-11 proliferating in the 90s, most rural towns never had 24 hour anything. Rural Gen Xers might have caught some 24 hour places in the late 2000s. Working mids and nights has always been isolating.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 09:00 AM
1

I’m talking about thinking X and Boomers are tomato tomato.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 08:12 AM
0

Imagine being this dumb.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 06:41 AM
1

Always one of these comments, lol. Nobody owes you their masculinity.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 05:26 AM
1

Remember 5 or 6 years ago when we weren't on the brink of another world war...
/r/MensRights14/03/24 01:33 AM
8

Zero proof, just sketchbooks, journals, patents, eye witness accounts…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 12:15 AM
2

Because there’s no such thing as “male gaze”. People, especially women, want to be noticed. “Male gaze” turns this fact on its head in order to demonize men.
/r/MensRights17/02/24 07:40 AM
1

Terms to ridicule and laugh at constantly: objectification, sex pest, creepy, male gaze, sexualizing. Never let 'em slide. These are BS words with no real meaning, meant only to subjugate men and unacceptable women.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:34 AM
1

They will never stop damsel-ing. There’s not even a real conversation to be had. These women are one of the safest group in human history, and it’s never going to be enough.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 06:55 AM
3

Objectification is not inherently part of dehumanization. Calling something “theory” doesn’t make it real.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 05:58 AM
1

rofl lmfao
/r/MensRights21/01/24 04:36 AM
2

people who have no effect on your life Obviously these things affect people’s lives. YouTubers “pranking” people, Tik Tokkers taking up public space, women in gyms falsely accusing men of staring at them (which has been discussed with evidence over and over), people recoding sexualized content… this stuff affects people . To the extent many gyms have now have “no recording” policies. I was only pretending to be stupid! Since we’ve normalized not understanding rhetoric: You’re doing a great job! …
/r/MensRights20/01/24 11:21 PM
1

you think the person being "inconsiderate" in this clip I didn’t say anything about that clip. We are talking about the greater context that clip exists within. The common “influencer” behavior in gyms that lead to this hostility. you think what she's doing has anything to do with selling porn It was a rhetorical quip. One could easily leave out the “for OF” and my point wouldn’t change. And that shows the dishonest attitude of this article… because of it was a male YouTuber nobody would care. T…
/r/MensRights20/01/24 10:36 PM
16

Imagine being so committed to your Patriarchal wet dream that you a) Can’t recognize a rhetorical quip, and b) Can’t fathom that your children women might be frequently inconsiderate in gyms despite new videos of it getting uploaded almost every day.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 11:03 AM
32

We try to go outside- like to the gym. And there they are recording themselves for OF, in everyone’s way.
/r/MensRights20/01/24 08:49 AM
5

Their goal was simply to destroy it, and they did.
/r/MensRights04/01/24 05:27 PM
1

‘Icks”
/r/MensRights02/01/24 04:47 AM
3

clearly an issue women face infinitely more than men They don’t “face” it, they make money off of it. And there is plenty of handwringing and angry scolding to men over that situation. Of course, anyone who’s actually talked to women knows they have degradation and submission fantasies. As do men. On that note, you’re projecting. It’s fair to wonder why this kind of porn is so common.
/r/MensRights02/01/24 02:17 AM
2

In other words, it doesn’t mean the dictionary definition that existed for centuries. It’s not just the act of including. Nor does it simply refer to a normal social context that “regular people” might use. You’re not really ever talking about the inclusion of a shy kid at the pizza party, for example. You’re talking specifically about a belief system that you have. You’re defining the word “inclusion” (and the word “access” fwiw) exclusively within that framework… …While letting others stay ign…
/r/MensRights17/12/23 06:15 PM
9

What does “inclusion” mean?
/r/MensRights17/12/23 01:59 PM
4

Who cares what women like feminists desire physically though.
/r/MensRights14/12/23 04:07 PM
9

You equate a desire for simple human decency with “women not being nice to you”.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:43 AM
1

Whatever, lol
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:33 AM
1

Oh stfu. If you can’t understand a simple metaphor, this discussion on basic human decency is too advanced for you. And lol at your little downvoter friend.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:31 AM
7

Noted. Yeah that’s silly. If a car is coming at me and I swerve to avoid it, I don’t need to “be responsible for the way I act” in swerving. This is a woman straight up telling you how women socially punish men for showing emotion. Here ya go: I hereby take responsibility for being guarded with my emotions because women are generally toxic.
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:17 AM
13

What are you saying? What are you even talking about? This post is about a feminist dimly realizing she objectifies men like most women do. What does that have to do with men acting one way or another?
/r/MensRights12/12/23 02:06 AM
6

I always hated feminism, so I'm not sure if it counts. But I did generally "blame men" for everything. To be fair- I'm Gen X and I grew up when a lot of male behavior was bad. Now women are ten times worse. It's abstract, but for me it was the cultural rollercoaster of this century. In the 90s, I think culture was on a good path. It was socially in vogue to use your brain and be enlightened about sex. It wasn't cool to shame virgins, ugly women, or shy people. Society wasn't acting stupid about …
/r/MensRights29/11/23 01:04 PM
1

Only if they’re married to them.
/r/MensRights26/11/23 09:42 PM
2

For one it shows we’re not a peer group and there is no “patriarchy”.
/r/MensRights24/11/23 04:47 AM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 06:08 AM
1

Feminine toxicity and masculine toxicity. Interesting to me that the term “toxic human behavior” sounds right- I think because human behavior is a grand total. Masculinity and feminine seem potentially objective.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 01:36 AM
1

Two things: Afghanistan. Those women could have taken up arms. They could've fought. They could've done anything men did. Instead, hundreds of thousands of men from across the globe fought and died to liberate them, and they didn't care in the slightest. I suspect many of them even pushed for patriarchy. They are a standing example of women throughout history. 2. Jobs. If you've ever worked at a very busy restaurant or retail, you know people just want to get the work done and get out. Gender st…
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:27 AM
1

Two things: Afghanistan. Those women could have taken up arms. They could've fought. They could've done anything men did. Instead, hundreds of thousands of men from across the globe fought and died to liberate them, and they didn't care in the slightest. I suspect many of them even pushed for patriarchy. They are a standing example of women throughout history. Tell 'em to get a fast paced job. If you've ever worked at a very busy restaurant or retail, you know people just want to get the work do…
/r/MensRights16/11/23 03:18 AM
6

At least people are pointing out all the cruel things she has said about men’s bodies.
/r/MensRights15/11/23 03:15 PM
1

They're a black separatist troll who's only posted here once in a year, and it was another thing about white people.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:18 PM
1

Coming to the realization you're a Black separatist who just came here to say that.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 08:20 AM
1

It’s odd because I just saw a random clip from about 1990 on youtube where Bjork said the exact same thing. How could people be so completely clueless.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 05:29 AM
7

Objective journalist with pieces like A World Without Men The women of South Korea’s 4B movement aren’t fighting the patriarchy — they’re leaving it behind entirely.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 09:04 PM
1

Almost never. For one thing, guys tolerate a lot. So occasionally you’ll meet a guy who doesn’t like women and it’s just like “Yeah. Yeah, true...” I’d say in my whole life I’ve met maybe three guys who fit that description, and they’re on the level of how the twoxchromosome sub feels about men.
/r/MensRights13/11/23 05:14 PM
2

Well I directly answered your question. There wasn't anything to add, really. I'm aware that you only want to talk about men, because everyone only wants to blame men. I am pointing out that women do all of those things as well. Anyone who's ever been around women knows that they do not control themselves well around hot guys. From Elvis clips to the breakroom talk at your local grocery store. Or even youtube clips of their inappropriate behavior. It is disingenuous to pretend like women wearing…
/r/MensRights12/11/23 09:36 PM
3

Nope. But some people do- like women who play the damsel or falsely accuse when they get caught doing stuff, for example.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 08:03 PM
9

Are you really saying that men are incapable of controlling how they react when they see an attractive woman? Many women are incapable of controlling how they react when they see an attractive man. Especially if he were mostly undressed in public. So it follows that at least some men are not as well.
/r/MensRights12/11/23 05:22 AM
1

but men have to become less violent. For one, women will never stop being attracted to men who at least have the ability to be violent. And they’ll never stop rewarding those who actually are. And they’ll never stop making fun of those who really aren’t. And men will never stop pleasing women. So that’s out.
/r/MensRights10/11/23 03:11 AM
2

We don’t live in a normal society. We live in a society that indulges false accusations.
/r/MensRights09/11/23 05:26 PM
3

You guys might think of me as a Pick Me girl ora Attention Seeker No, it's women who think those kinds of things.
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:16 PM
–

FFS: If you're raising a child, it's your child. This kind of thinking doesn't help anyone. It hurts kids, it messes with decent men who step up to help kids, and it actually takes the focus off of women who do this shit.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:25 AM
8

So you're saying these freakishly oversized vaginas are a male issue. Got it.
/r/MensRights05/11/23 03:10 AM
1

What? What does that mean?
/r/MensRights02/11/23 04:05 AM
3

then they are millennials. You're calling me a gatekeeper but you clearly don't know the generational experience involved. Nobody's gatekeeping when it comes to this generation. If someone lived through it, then they know. Gen X was around long before the Millennial idea even formed.
/r/MensRights02/11/23 03:49 AM
1

Millennials are a different schemata from Gen X. People born until 1981 are the “13th Generation”, by that schemata. It has nothing to do with us. People born in the late 70s early 80s are Generation Y, calling themselves Xennials nowadays.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 11:40 PM
3

Millennials are irrelevant to the subject. Generation X exists independently from the things Strauss and Howe wrote.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 08:00 PM
2

Yes. Feminism is illiberal.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 04:27 AM
19

Real Gen X (who are in their very late 40s up to early 60s) are generally post feminist, and wishing 21st Century culture hadn’t regressed to stupidity then amplified to insanity.
/r/MensRights01/11/23 04:16 AM
1

tend to just command people to do things Right! If you remember the "bossy" uproar about a decade ago. Feminists literally couldn't see the difference. No... people aren't just calling girls and women "bossy" for the heck of it. Their behavior is different. On the other hand I worked at a restaurant when I was younger and I still look back on that manager as an ultimate how-to for leadership. People woulda died for that woman, lol. If you get it, you get it.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:12 PM
5

If they cared about a real concept, it would be "masculine toxicity". Toxic behavior that takes a masculine or feminine flavor of execution. But they don't care; it's just another BS slogan for demonizing men. It's funny because bad, supposedly "masculine" traits like above (or violence, stubbornness, and bullying) come out real fast anytime a woman is actually responsible for getting work done. Anyone who's had female managers at a stressful job can attest to that. And "mama bear" mothers love …
/r/MensRights24/10/23 04:32 AM
1

I love being creepy. Be creeped out, bitches.
/r/MensRights09/10/23 06:00 AM
14

It's more of a warning to boys/men of the type of girl who will do that. Hot take: In her mind it's just tit for tat. She doesn't see rape as a bad thing that bad people do. She sees it as a regular thing that men do unless they're taught not to. Feminists are unwilling to comprehend a difference between the actual, malicious, or even evil intent of rape vs. how dominant and submissive sexual interactions can go horribly wrong. They don't want to understand it. They need men in general to be a f…
/r/MensRights26/09/23 03:31 PM
25

https://archive.ph/tZn3B Archive version. Don’t give them clicks
/r/MensRights26/09/23 02:39 PM
1

It’s just insane. False accusal of rape is rape.
/r/MensRights26/09/23 02:37 PM
9

Women don't go through anything compared to what guys go through. Because they refuse to learn self defense or take the slightest responsibility for their own safety in any way, their anxiety is easily exploited by feminists. They're taught to live in fear. Thus they lack the street smarts common to an average 8th grade boy. They're completely unable to read many ordinary situations. As such, any guy doing anything is cause for the most disparaging over-reactions or even insults. Ironically this…
/r/MensRights24/09/23 11:31 PM
1

No it’s not. Right there in the name.
/r/MensRights23/09/23 04:55 PM
1

Women have power all over the place, and they're not criticizing other women. Greta Gerwig didn't just write Snow White and Barbie to criticize women. Women now dominate Psychology, and suddenly the American Psychological Association is talking about "toxic masculinity" like it's real and men comment that therapists seem to blame them from the get-go. (Likewise, white men a century had no trouble criticizing "hysterical" women with "penis envy".) Men don't see each other as a peer group; that's …
/r/MensRights21/09/23 03:50 AM
9

I can hear it now. Men have all the rights and protections! Men are the ones breaking all the laws! Women need more protections because women aren't safe!!1
/r/MensRights14/09/23 04:16 PM
18

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/slur the patriarchy is a very real thing LOL.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 07:01 AM
17

It’s a slur, kinda like calling the legbeards who invented it “legbeards” …. which actually is hilarious. Or like if someone called you a “dork” for convincing yourself that random people on the internet are “losers”. People on YouTube get clicks; so what. I think this streamer lost a lot of audience by going socialist, if I’m not mistaken. Seems clear she gets clicks by giving real takes. Kinda icky how you’re getting off on the idea that some men are sad. I’m sure you’re quite the white knight…
/r/MensRights12/09/23 06:13 AM
35

pick me. Such a lame slur. Still, imagine being so threatened by women who don’t toe the line that you have to try to dehumanize them.
/r/MensRights12/09/23 05:16 AM
13

Not at all. It’s about how women treat men, and how that dynamic influences our conduct which they then complain about. Or possibly use to shame if they’re pulling a scam, like these two might’ve been. Race figures in to this dynamic and is a concern for some people.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 08:02 PM
25

Kinda like…. So what? Feminists literally label straight white men as the root of evil all day, every day. I’ve certainly had to deal with that burden with women at my job, or walking at night. And by the numbers, black men literally are more likely to be threatening to society, and it’s sad regular black guys have to carry that burden. So what.
/r/MensRights26/08/23 06:18 PM
1

Working an honest job is not "wage cucking".
/r/MensRights22/08/23 06:08 AM
10

Women made fun of fat women then, and they make fun of other women for being fat now. It's funny this would come up in regards to Lizzo, who is now accused of fat-shaming Arianna Davis, Crystal Williams and Noelle Rodriguez. It's not "different now" at all. Marta Kauffman was one of the two creators of Friends. She's the co-head writer: The show reflected her attitudes and humor from the start. She co-wrote famous fat shaming episodes like "The One that Could Have Been" and "The One With The Boo…
/r/MensRights22/08/23 03:10 AM
1

Women made fun of fat women then, and they do it now. It's not different now at all.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:13 AM
1

Now you can’t. Yeah we can.
/r/MensRights22/08/23 02:12 AM
1

Wow. Dropping “suss” and “4chan” in one post. Pretty hip! LOL. I feel like this is real feminism and a hundred examples will flood my brain at a random point later today. They’re furious at women once again- this time for liking dad bods. But they can’t face the real culprit without admitting they don’t speak for (or relate to) actual women. Rage rage what to do. So they crank out another yet anti-man scolding screed. But here’s the kicker: They know it’s lame, and they’ll sound like the screech…
/r/MensRights16/08/23 10:48 PM
1

Holy crap that quote. Clearly never had a job.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 03:45 PM
1

Sometimes it just seems like everyone is getting more and more stupid. It's sad (and rage-inducing) that our current era of liberalism will probably end with this wave of stupidity, and some form of 1950s dystopia will come back by the next 50s. I guess the 90s were the peak, this time around.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 04:00 AM
5

Yeah, this is the literal definition of sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights10/08/23 01:55 AM
10

This is maybe the third or fourth piece I’ve read by a trans person who has no idea how men work. And it always comes down to blaming men. The suicide rate is high because men lack the tools to navigate the loneliness that men created. Because of “men with their lack of emotional understanding”. Yeah, gtf outta here, you child who still thinks they’re safe walking around at night. You don’t know anything about being a man.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:55 PM
1

This one gets me every time. And women bring it up every time. How do they think they know men don’t carry pepper spray? Or a taser, or a knife, or ju jitsu, or kickboxing, karate, king fu… or a gun. A male American President said outright, “speak softly and carry a big stick." I told a female friend once: It’s not just that men take martial arts, men invented martial arts. Men invented Karate specifically because they weren’t safe walking home from work at night. It’s so weird how they’re so su…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 05:37 PM
7

Nobody blames "women". No more than you're blaming family, anyway. People have a right to point out the bad things that women do. And a responsibility to, because society almost never calls them out for anything.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:37 PM
9

It doesn't help anybody to just rag on people for their weakness. There are hardly any male role models anymore. Let alone for misfit/ out of the box types. I'm not even a fan or anything. But this was a cool guy who did cool shit and he found success based on offering something to the world; cultivating talent. He didn't just manipulate people to get rich off them. He treated people with respect rather than being some male Karen type like Kanye West or Jay Z. People now say West is Generation X…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:55 PM
3

Yeah, Roe V Wade which was installed by a bunch of straight white men, and then dismantled by a woman and a black man.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 09:26 PM
8

Men are not nearly as strong as some other men. So what? We still have to defend ourselves (and women too).
/r/MensRights30/07/23 11:52 PM
4

She’s a key screenwriter for a Disney TV show, a published author of both children’s novels and adult books, a former journalist at Entertainment Weekly, and a podcaster for iheartmedia- one of the largest online media conglomerates. She went to an Ivy university. Safe to assume she’s a millionaire or close. She basically is institutional power. And clearly she’s a sexist and racist, full of hate. And society is just fine with it.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 10:59 PM
14

When will people learn that if you make a simple joke on social media, they’ll use it to brand your whole identity. This guy owns twitter and he still hasn’t figured that out.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:41 PM
1

Care to give example of just how the USA has become more left leaning, and how that's a bad thing? Where did I say it was a bad thing? Dude you are fighting a fantasy war in a pretend world that extends up to calling me narcissistic and stupid over nothing. You accuse me of “double talk” and frankly I don’t know wtf you’re talking about. Look around. State after state passed legalization for pot. Marriage equality passed nationally. That is not right wing. Up until the 1990s, people didn’t even …
/r/MensRights24/07/23 10:38 PM
1

No it’s not. It’s completely straight foreword and it says what it says. The nation is far more Left than it was 20 years ago. Let alone 30 or 40 years ago.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:09 PM
1

Baloney. If you talk to almost anyone on the street, they believe in marriage equality for homosexuals. They believe pot should be legal. They believe drugs should be decriminalized. They're concerned about the environment and want regulations. They want a solution for health care. All of that (and more) used to be fringe; now it's mainstream. The only thing that has shifted right is abortion- and even that is just a couple states. Frankly, we would have ended up with moderate judges and wouldn'…
/r/MensRights24/07/23 08:52 AM
1

Yeah we don't want a far left. Having said that, this movie is exactly how reality looks to rich kids like Gertwig and Baumbach who've never had to struggle.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 04:04 AM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVgp1CNiC_s&t=0s I don't know much about youtubers like Venti, but this exposé seems pretty legit.
/r/MensRights24/07/23 03:31 AM
56

Weird how we're suddenly at this stage where they stop pretending Feminism was ever about equality.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 12:10 PM
1

And yet it’s so true.
/r/MensRights23/07/23 01:15 AM
1

"Oi!! Evenin' mate. We received a tip you hate-posted the phrase "please how does that make sense" on da 20th of July. We're just going to issue a warning dis toime, but you best watch yourself. No more misogyny on the internet!"
/r/MensRights21/07/23 12:40 AM
1

In their comments?
/r/MensRights18/07/23 05:44 PM
49

LOL. You’re presented with four screenshots of women randomly accusing all men of being lazy liars and cheaters simply if they like a spontaneous person- and your take is that this sub is angry and bitter? In fact the OP is “sharing their own personal experiences”, on Bumble, and hoping it’s just that site. The comments are all angry blanket statements, where only one even mentions a personal experience.
/r/MensRights18/07/23 03:29 PM
1

It’s funny- one of the several times a woman flashed me her breasts it’s because my friend cat called her and friend. (Much to my embarrassment.) Oh waddya know, here’s noted feminist Jessica Valenti complaining she misses being cat called. Don’t be a chump: The UK is just using these laws to gain social control. Soft police state. But women will always act like helpless damsels when it suits them. A whistle? literally shaking right now!
/r/MensRights15/07/23 02:18 AM
10

Check out Wikipedia. Andy Samberg was born in 1978, what used to be called Generation Y; he came of age in about the easiest decade in living history. He comes from Berkeley California, where the median household income is almost 6 figures. He apparently grew up in a stable, comfortable household so permissive they let him change his name to Andy at the age of 5. He went to noted party school UC Santa Cruz, and then film school at NYU. Unclear whether his family paid for that, or he took out loa…
/r/MensRights13/07/23 03:41 AM
1

Her hate is a badge of honor for me.
/r/MensRights12/07/23 12:21 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:22 AM
3

What’s the weather like on your world? Never mind don’t wanna know
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:20 AM
4

Your comments are a joke and no one takes them seriously.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:14 AM
5

Nothing about your gender conflicts with my statement, you clown. A woman wrote the first blah blah blah For stuff made by men. And we celebrate it. Everybody likes women who aren’t assholes.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 03:09 AM
6

Men invented and created every single thing in your life. Sit down and shut up.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 02:47 AM
18

They can't comprehend that humans actually love each other and want to work together, and that we're not all fighting their cartoon gender war.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 03:59 PM
1

It's normal and natural for people to want to see attractive people on screen. Hotter than average, tougher than average, etc. Same reason we like to see sex scenes- originally that's not something you'd get to see every day. Even now with porn, we like to see intelligent sex scenes about real characters. This has been demonized for men as the "male gaze", but not for women.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 03:43 AM
5

Would be better if they didn't take up men's issues through their cult lens of blaming men.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:17 PM
1

Plus that they hate men and don't care about their problems. Have you ever heard feminists talk about the men in their lives that they love? At best it's like "they're a couple of the good ones, even if they are big dummies". In my experience it's not always at at best either. I've seen a lot of irrational cartoon hero worship too, like how a true misogynist might feel about their dear old mum. No thanks. They don't you to suffer in the way cult members don't want you to suffer.
/r/MensRights07/07/23 07:12 PM
11

I think it should change to "Not regular men". 1) It's true, and 2) It will drive them nuts.
/r/MensRights01/07/23 12:39 AM
28

To me it was a real mask-off moment. Stuff like "Kill All Men" is safe radical- privileged wine aunts with office jobs being edgy. Like Che shirts in the 90s. But somehow the "Future is Female" slogan hit me different. Like wow, they're not even hiding it anymore. It's not about equality in society; it never was. Feminism is about a feminist women taking over, and justifying their rule over everyone.
/r/MensRights29/06/23 05:21 AM
4

I almost feel like stooping to their level is the answer. Fighting fire with fire. Creating groups like “These Women Post on Slander Sites” and making the world aware. Put up fliers and posters around town; why not. Rent a highway billboard and feature the most common contributors, lol.
/r/MensRights25/06/23 03:33 PM
1

On every level, men are invisible. Men's accomplishment's are people's accomplishments. People invented ibuprofen or air conditioning. The fact that men invented these things, while dealing with men's problems, doesn't matter. The fact that men took the risks, going broke or being homeless to make their idea happen, doesn't matter. This is because men do things for people. Thus men's culture is just part of society and women need "reprisentation" in it. People complain about the male gaze in fil…
/r/MensRights24/06/23 05:28 PM
1

Jesus Christ woman, I don't have time for your desire not to be raped All just fantasy land.
/r/MensRights24/06/23 12:50 AM
1

Riiiight. The 1600s. Ok, what do you think the consequences for women raping their husbands were in that time frame? Or around the world? "Little research exists focusing on the specific situation of non-consensual wife-to-husband sexual relations" This would be the relevant quote from your link. There's not much "education" to be had, really. Maybe Denise Hines, who found men and women do these things in equal measure. On that note: Like millions of normal people, I have been "woken up with sex…
/r/MensRights22/06/23 05:23 PM
2

No: Normal people have never raped their spouses as punishment. People don't view their spouses as property, never did. Society was never based on controlling women.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 11:32 PM
3

What do you mean, women tasked men? Lol, What do you mean, men prevented women? Lol. Women have been owning property, working, running businesses, and even running for president all along. Even before men helped make it a social norm. You just choose to ignore it. Women literally tell men to do certain things. As in word for word. And women adore "men in uniform", and put white feathers on men who won't be soldiers. Women en masse could've prevented the Taliban take-over of Afghanistan, but they…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 11:08 PM
3

LOL. For all of history... Women tasked men with running society. Women tasked men with going out to die to protect them. Even now, in a free society, women task men with providing for them and protecting them. So yeah, there was brief gap between poor men and women participating in running society. Like a few years. Also: No draft for for the damsels. Not even community service. It took society thousands of years to "realise" women weren't inferior? Yes. It took thousands of years to get to mod…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 10:27 PM
3

and treating them (and women in general) like property. Evidence? Seriously, do you have evidence that any normal person ever felt their wife (or husband for that matter), should be treated like "property"? Spoiler alert: No, you don't. Because this is just your weird power fantasy. These were real human beings, who loved each other, and were trying to get by. They're doing what was proven to work to survive. Wouldn't you "want" to be married in a world where pregnancy is a constant risk, you're…
/r/MensRights21/06/23 08:32 PM
5

You're seriously asking for evidence that women wanted to get married? Wanted a man who made them feel "special"? Who would "take care of them", etc. ? Maybe you should talk to women. And/or read stuff written by women.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 06:39 PM
3

We are talking about America, not traveling abroad. I almost never hear Feminists talk about issues in those countries, tbh.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 05:30 PM
6

No such thing as "toxic masculinity". Also, women at the time looked to "land a man". They wanted to find a man who treated them as a sacred possession. That's how people survived. This was before men invented a lot of the things that make our lives so safe for options now.
/r/MensRights21/06/23 04:42 PM
1

Feminism hates men. There will never be worthwhile discussion in spaces like TwoChromosomes. Every centimeter of every level in our society teaches that men oppress women. Most men buy it.
/r/MensRights19/06/23 02:31 AM
6

tighty-whitey underwear skidmark of a man Yeah, why can't we all just be cool, breezy, expensive pairs of boxers that take her crap.
/r/MensRights16/06/23 03:15 AM
0

It’s just rlly sad that people have to put on clothes to be safe from others looking at their bodies.
/r/MensRights24/05/23 06:39 AM
3

It’s like they are trying to go from one fascism to another.
/r/MensRights19/05/23 02:06 AM
1

Yeah, true. But there are lots of people who go from college to professions without much hardship. Enough that people have experiences dealing with them. Everyone who's a licensed therapist with a degree went through academia to get there. Some of those people are experienced with the outside world. Many are not. Physical labor could be a reliable gauge of that. It's a shorthand for the kind of hardship men are expected to endure out in the world. I think the original comment was more focused on…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 05:28 PM
32

Why would a therapist need to have done physical labor to be a good therapist? Because physical labor is hardship, and many people have to endure that hardship to achieve goals in their life. This is especially true of men- who are assigned by society to endure such hardships and achieve. There is a class of people who are not in touch with that reality. Thus they have a distorted view of people's experiences and motivations. Academia is populated by this other class. Many of them become therapi…
/r/MensRights05/04/23 04:46 PM
2

https://archive.is/5uyet archive link. Don’t give ‘em your clicks.
/r/MensRights04/04/23 04:22 AM
20

Yes it is. And while you can overpower or run away from someone attempting assault, it’s hard to get away from false accusers. (Luckily the public is waking up to it, somewhat.) But you’re right; one does need to be careful with psycho women. Hence this conversation.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 01:42 AM
22

I imagine I would learn self defense and not do risky stuff. False accusal is rape.
/r/MensRights01/04/23 01:26 AM
26

People underestimate just how toxic Emily Ratajkowski is. I’ve known far too many white men who move through the world unaware of their privilege, and I’ve been traumatized by many of my experiences with them. And boys too; it’s shocking to realize how early young boys gain a sense of entitlement—to girls’ bodies and to the world in general.…. From a Vogue interview while pregnant with her son. (Before the divorce.)
/r/MensRights29/03/23 01:17 PM
1

In other news, 98% of everything is men.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 02:58 PM
1

I should have said story or incident, not post. Embarrassing I said Bret; corrected. I thought we were talking about whether or not any sex with underlings is always abusive, "full stop". I am saying it's not. I am saying that idea is ripe for abuse, and will be abused. That's why/how Chris Avellone and others were targeted.
/r/MensRights27/03/23 01:37 AM
1

Weinstein coerced with sex for favors and intimidated people with retribution. He did not entice anyone with the sex itself. But we are not talking about Harvey Weinstein. Nor anyone like him. We're talking about normal people who have sex because power and achievement are hot. those who might fall for each other in situations with unbalanced power dynamics have a simple and reasonable way to proceed forward if they are seriously in love. No. This is a complete fabrication. There is nothing "sim…
/r/MensRights27/03/23 12:22 AM
1

Right, and I’m saying and I can handle it if my boss entices me with sex. Normal adults can handle it and they enjoy it. There is a literal difference between “entice” and “intimidate”. People have been sleeping with bosses, professors, leaders, older ladies and men, etc. for centuries and it’s fine. Success is attractive. Power is attractive and it doesn’t equate to cruelty. That’s the difference between enticing sex and coercion. These are natural sexual desires that are not automatically wron…
/r/MensRights26/03/23 06:04 PM
2

Yeah, exactly. It's using sex to break someone's psyche and destroy their reputation. I think these two women only accused him of random groping and maybe a kiss? Which is utterly ridiculous... and he still lost his job and everything.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 09:56 AM
2

Full stop, it’s not wrong for adults to entice each other into sex. That does not belong with those other words.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:14 AM
6

False accusal is rape.
/r/MensRights26/03/23 04:07 AM
3

No. Now they say men privilege each other socially, like a secret club. They say this has been happening for thousands of years, “centuries of oppression”, and literally drives all of civilization. Defines history. But it’s not a crazy conspiracy theory. It’s funny (not) because the whole point of modern culture is that we’re different from history. Never have things been so free; never have so many humans had it so easy. Literally no one has anything to do with people they’ve never met in the p…
/r/MensRights10/03/23 06:45 PM
261

By framing it as women’s “rights” they’ve already seeded a response.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 02:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter